| akawai | whoami-rajat: It's about the patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/892608 in the feature list. | 01:42 |
|---|---|---|
| akawai | I've re-uploaded it along your comment which is to separate patches for each features. Please check it. | 01:42 |
| liuc49 | Hello reviewers, Could you please review 893330: Reference - Documentation correction | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/893330 ? Thank you! | 02:08 |
| opendevreview | XuQi proposed openstack/cinder master: Fujitsu Driver: Add QoS support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/847730 | 03:47 |
| opendevreview | Alan Baghumian proposed openstack/cinder master: Automatically map availability zones to volume types. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/893593 | 03:49 |
| akawai | Cores: Could you add "Zuul" as reviewer to the following patches? The patches were NOT added reviewer "Zuul" automatically when uploading, so, the patch don't have a result of Zuul test. | 05:33 |
| akawai | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/892608 | 05:34 |
| akawai | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/885986 | 05:34 |
| akawai | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/885986 | 05:34 |
| akawai | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/892616 | 05:34 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/cinder master: HPE XP and NEC V: Host group name is not correct https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/879830 | 12:39 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: Fix exception when deleted volume is busy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/885986 | 12:39 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: fix to initialize a lock counter https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/892616 | 12:39 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/cinder master: HPE XP: Support HA https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/892608 | 12:41 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/cinder master: Follow up: HPE XP: support data deduplication and compression https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/893331 | 12:42 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: fix to initialize a lock counter https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/892616 | 12:42 |
| rosmaita | akawai: openstack-infra team thinks it is because those patches were in a relation chain that was out of date, so they suggested rebasing each patch onto its current parent ... let's see what happens | 12:43 |
| rosmaita | looks like it worked: https://zuul.openstack.org/status#892608,885986,892616 | 12:52 |
| yusufgungor | Hi everyone, does nvme with dm multipath is supported or we have to use native nvme multipath? | 14:24 |
| whoami-rajat_ | yusufgungor, hi, IIUC nvme native multipathing is supported if the host supports it (read from file '/sys/module/nvme_core/parameters/multipath'), i don't think much work was done for dm multipathing support | 14:28 |
| whoami-rajat_ | but geguileo, can tell better on this ^ | 14:28 |
| geguileo | yusufgungor: We don't support multipathing on NVMe-oF using multipathd, only native multipathing (ANA) is supported | 14:30 |
| geguileo | yusufgungor: but due to an issue in OpenStack the multipathd daemon must be running to use multipathing with NVMe-oF (even if it's not being used) | 14:31 |
| geguileo | yusufgungor: yeah I know... It's nasty :-( | 14:31 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/os-brick stable/2023.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/894353 | 14:55 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/os-brick stable/2023.2: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/894354 | 14:55 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/os-brick master: Update master for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/894355 | 14:55 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext stable/2023.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext/+/894357 | 14:55 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext stable/2023.2: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext/+/894359 | 14:55 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext master: Update master for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext/+/894360 | 14:55 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-cinderclient stable/2023.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/894366 | 14:56 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-cinderclient stable/2023.2: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/894367 | 14:56 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-cinderclient master: Update master for stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/894368 | 14:56 |
| ganso | whoami-rajat, rosmaita: hi! is there an estimate for the next yoga tag? It has been 6 months now since the latest tag, I thought by now we would have a new one including the latest backports | 15:29 |
| rosmaita | i think there's a patch up for release? | 15:29 |
| rosmaita | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/889428 | 15:30 |
| ganso | rosmaita: oh wow, there is, I haven't seen that, but it has been quite a while now that patch has been proposed and sitting there | 15:31 |
| ganso | rosmaita: who's the person/team that approves that? | 15:31 |
| yusufgungor | Thanks for replies @whoami-rajat_ @geguileo | 15:33 |
| whoami-rajat_ | ganso, rosmaita Jon (jbernard) has proposed release patches for all stable branches, this is the yoga one https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/893795 | 15:35 |
| whoami-rajat_ | ganso, release team approves it but PTLs/release liaison also has a vote | 15:36 |
| opendevreview | Eric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: RBD: tpool.Proxy client object https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/894226 | 16:02 |
| opendevreview | Eric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: RBD: Flattening of child volumes during deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/835384 | 16:02 |
| dwhite4 | Hello all, I'm trying to update our CI to Ubuntu 22.04 and am having what seems like a PATH/venv issue with the cinder volume service, curious if this look familiar to anyone or if anyone has a suggestion? during get_qemu_data: Stderr: 'sudo: cinder-rootwrap: command not found\n'. | 16:18 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/os-brick stable/2023.2: Use generic testing template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/894270 | 16:18 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/python-cinderclient stable/2023.2: Use generic testing template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/894272 | 16:20 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext stable/2023.2: Use generic testing template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext/+/894278 | 16:21 |
| opendevreview | Ashley Rodriguez proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph master: Remote Ceph with cephadm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/876747 | 16:41 |
| jbernard | whoami-rajat_: do you have comment on Elod's query here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/893795/1 ? | 17:55 |
| jbernard | whoami-rajat_: re calling the yoga brick release 5.3.0 instead of 5.2.4 | 17:56 |
| whoami-rajat_ | jbernard, replied on it, tl;dr I'm good with 5.2.4 | 18:13 |
| jbernard | whoami-rajat_: great, i will get the whole stack updated | 18:14 |
| jbernard | whoami-rajat_: i just pushed a series update, should include all existing feedback | 18:37 |
| dwhite4 | re: my PATH/venv issue in case anyone else does run into this, I resolved it by setting the PATH in devstack@c-vol.service. The path was specified in many of the other devstack service files, but not the volumes service file | 21:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!