Tuesday, 2024-03-12

opendevreviewYian Zong proposed openstack/cinder master: Dell PowerMax: Fix SnapVx unlink failure  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/90226204:19
happystackerHey team. It looks like one Zuul is failing on this patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/91032007:28
happystackerit seems that the error is because of a duplicate bug id found on two patches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/784140/10/releasenotes/notes/bug-1920870-ibm-svf-fix-extend-issue-for-mirroring-volumes-31b1a9119c49e112.yaml and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/813532/2/releasenotes/notes/bug-1951250-storwize-fix-multiple-ssh-calls-for-retype-d3b56379b7d8b049.yaml07:32
happystackerthose patches were merged a long time ago, I don't know why this is happening now07:33
fricklerhappystacker: that issue seems unrelated to your patch, there are some reno fixes pending to get merged due to unmaintained branches, e.g. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/91134807:38
fricklerrosmaita: whoami-rajat: jbernard: ^^07:39
happystackerfrickler: I agree, it's not related07:56
happystackerbut the error says 07:57
happystackerWarning, treated as error:07:57
happystacker /home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/cinder/releasenotes/source/zed.rst:3:Duplicate explicit target name: "bug #1920870".07:57
happystackerhttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/014a6072f6b544e4829290ba683360b407:57
whoami-rajatI've approved the patch for xena-eom07:59
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext master: reno: Update master for xena Unmaintained status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext/+/91135308:01
fricklerwhoami-rajat: you'll likely need to do the same for v+w08:02
whoami-rajatyeah, thanks for the reminder, i almost forgot about those patches08:02
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-cinderclient master: reno: Update master for xena Unmaintained status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/91135508:03
opendevreviewMerged openstack/os-brick master: reno: Update master for xena Unmaintained status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/91135108:05
*** mklejn_ is now known as mklejn08:55
mnederlofHi, would someone be able to review this small patch? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/91165009:12
jbernardmnederlof: i see a conflict with this other patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/811032 are they addressing the same problem?10:37
mnederlofimho that patch is addressing changes which have been implemented in another way already in current master branch (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/785099)10:41
mnederlofin my patch i am only addressing the issue that the AZ field is actually filled whenever a backup is created10:42
mnederlofwith the AZ of the service it is picked up by10:42
jbernardmnederlof: will take a look today10:45
mnederlofthanks!10:45
*** geguileo is now known as Guest252010:52
*** Guest2520 is now known as geguileo11:39
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-cinderclient stable/2024.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/91212112:26
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-cinderclient stable/2024.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/91212212:26
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext stable/2024.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext/+/91211812:27
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext stable/2024.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext/+/91211912:27
opendevreviewMerged openstack/os-brick stable/2024.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/91211513:07
opendevreviewMerged openstack/os-brick stable/2024.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2024.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/91211613:07
bryanneumannHi All, is it appropriate to rebase an approved pull request or wait? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/910320 has a test failing that should be resolved by rebase15:37
clarkbbryanneumann: if the fix is merged then all you should need is a recheck because zuul runs all jobs against the current state of the tree (auto rebasing essentially)15:47
clarkbif you do rebase then you will lose your approval. So it probably depends on how quickly you think the fix will merge. If it will merge soon then I would just wait and recheck once the fix is merged otherwise you can rebase and try to get a new approval15:48
bryanneumannThank you very much clarkb15:55
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-cinderclient master: reno: Update master for wallaby Unmaintained status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/91134618:30
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext master: reno: Update master for wallaby Unmaintained status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext/+/91134418:30
opendevreviewMerged openstack/os-brick master: reno: Update master for wallaby Unmaintained status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/91134218:31
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext master: reno: Update master for victoria Unmaintained status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext/+/91133518:33
opendevreviewMerged openstack/os-brick master: reno: Update master for victoria Unmaintained status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/91133318:34
opendevreviewMerged openstack/python-cinderclient master: reno: Update master for victoria Unmaintained status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/91133718:34
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Correct releasenote bug-1951250  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/91263018:42
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Correct releasenote bug-1951250  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/91263019:12
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Correct releasenote bug-1951250  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/91263020:20
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder stable/zed: Correct releasenote bug-1951250  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/91265020:25

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!