opendevreview | 陈希 proposed openstack/cinder master: Support zte vstorage driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/923016 | 00:59 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | kiran pawar proposed openstack/os-brick master: StorPool: Raise on spopenstack, SP_OURID issues https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/887576 | 03:29 |
opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/cinder master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/923190 | 03:41 |
opendevreview | NotTheEvilOne proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Add support for the "bring your own keys" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/908750 | 06:54 |
opendevreview | NotTheEvilOne proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Small cleanups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/908757 | 06:54 |
opendevreview | NotTheEvilOne proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Add description about conflicts with non-encrypted volume types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/914513 | 06:54 |
andrewbonney | whoami-rajat: thanks for the pointers on https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2070475. Further checks suggest the online migrations are ignoring deleted volumes/snapshots. I've updated the report | 07:51 |
whoami-rajat | andrewbonney, you are right, we are not including the deleted rows in the query for online data migration | 08:02 |
whoami-rajat | andrewbonney, i think the only way to continue will be purging the deleted records, cinder-manage db purge 0 (given you don't require the deleted records anymore) | 08:03 |
andrewbonney | Ok, thanks | 08:03 |
*** geguileo is now known as Guest477 | 08:12 | |
*** Guest477 is now known as geguileo | 08:12 | |
*** gaudenz_ is now known as gaudenz | 08:54 | |
opendevreview | Atsushi Kawai proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: Fix to set correct object ID for LDEV nickname https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/923354 | 09:34 |
frickler | rosmaita: gate failure on sdk job for 2023.1, but with volume tests, so not sure if it might be related https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/c760642bfd354011b0e6c27f5502d877 | 11:10 |
rosmaita | frickler: i think something else is going on with that job, https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstacksdk-functional-devstack&project=openstack%2Fcinder&branch=stable%2F2023.1&skip=0 | 13:12 |
rosmaita | and the patch did pass once on it | 13:12 |
frickler | yes, might have just been bad luck, but I thought it would be better to have a look instead of simply rechecking | 13:14 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/cinder stable/2024.1: CVE-2024-32498: Check for external qcow2 data file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/923245 | 13:41 |
*** geguileo is now known as Guest494 | 13:48 | |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/cinder stable/2023.1: CVE-2024-32498: Check for external qcow2 data file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/923247 | 21:36 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/cinder stable/2023.2: CVE-2024-32498: Check for external qcow2 data file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/923246 | 21:36 |
fungi | looks like all the ossa-2024-001 cinder patches for maintained branches have merged now | 22:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!