*** mhen_ is now known as mhen | 02:25 | |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cinder master: db: Move helpers to cinder.db.sqlalchemy.api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/837543 | 05:55 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cinder master: db: Use cinder.db.api directly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/846173 | 06:09 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cinder master: db: Use cinder.db.api directly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/846173 | 06:17 |
frickler | jbernard: I don't understand where that sla failure is coming from, either. let's hope andrey can share some more insight | 07:22 |
*** geguileo is now known as Guest530 | 08:39 | |
opendevreview | Biser Milanov proposed openstack/cinder master: test_storpool.py: Assume volumes have a volume type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/926272 | 09:24 |
opendevreview | Biser Milanov proposed openstack/cinder master: StorPool: Propagate a 'storpool:qos_class' extra spec to the StorPool API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/926273 | 09:24 |
*** gfidente_ is now known as gfidente | 11:24 | |
opendevreview | Biser Milanov proposed openstack/cinder master: StorPool: Propagate a 'storpool:qos_class' extra spec to the StorPool API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/926273 | 12:58 |
raghavendrat | hi whoami-rajat: are you around ? | 13:10 |
whoami-rajat | raghavendrat, hey | 13:10 |
raghavendrat | If you get some time, it would great to receive your feedback on below patch | 13:11 |
raghavendrat | HPE 3par - Fix retype volume | 13:11 |
raghavendrat | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/928599 | 13:11 |
opendevreview | YuehuiLei proposed openstack/cinder master: 重建镜像卷patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/936021 | 13:27 |
raghavendrat | Thank you Rajat for quick feedback | 14:20 |
*** jhorstmann is now known as Guest560 | 14:28 | |
jbernard | frickler: my thought was (without understanding the error itself) that the rally job is actually running and detecting an issue, which could mean the patch is successful in its intent. Curious what Aundrey thinks | 14:45 |
jbernard | frickler: i was wrong and i learned something about rally :) | 15:59 |
*** jhorstmann is now known as Guest571 | 16:20 | |
*** jhorstmann is now known as Guest576 | 17:05 | |
*** jhorstmann is now known as Guest586 | 18:47 | |
opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext master: Updating testing as per the 2025.1 cycle testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-brick-cinderclient-ext/+/935588 | 20:15 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cinder master: Drop duplicate hacking check of thrid party mock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/936070 | 21:08 |
*** jhorstmann is now known as Guest606 | 21:35 | |
*** jhorstmann is now known as Guest614 | 23:13 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!