| opendevreview | anthony gamboa proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: add support for Hitachi VSP One B20 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963344 | 00:42 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | anthony gamboa proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: add support for Hitachi VSP One B20 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963344 | 00:51 |
| opendevreview | anthony gamboa proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: Test Hitachi CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963005 | 00:57 |
| *** mhen_ is now known as mhen | 02:01 | |
| opendevreview | Gireesh Awasthi proposed openstack/cinder master: Added more debug logs for cinder volume creation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963197 | 06:17 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs master: zuul: run cinder-tempest-plugin tests too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/898965 | 12:52 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: NetApp: Handle storage assisted migration between vservers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963270 | 13:38 |
| jbernard | meeting will start in a few, waiting for an earlier one to wrap up | 14:03 |
| wizardbit | Good Morning | 14:04 |
| jbernard | #startmeeting cinder | 14:06 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Oct 8 14:06:20 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:06 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:06 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:06 |
| jbernard | courtesy ping: jungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney jbernard hemna fabiooliveira yuval tobias-urdin adiare happystacker dosaboy hillpd msaravan sp-bmilanov Luzi sfernand simondodsley zaubea nileshthathagar flelain | 14:06 |
| jbernard | note: meeting in #openstack-cinder (here) | 14:06 |
| jbernard | #topic roll call | 14:06 |
| jbernard | o/ | 14:06 |
| wizardbit | o/ | 14:07 |
| sfernand | hi | 14:08 |
| jbernard | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-gazpacho-meetings | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | o/ | 14:09 |
| jbernard | #topic annoucements | 14:10 |
| jbernard | first, welcome to the G release cycle | 14:10 |
| agalica | o/ | 14:10 |
| jbernard | the PTG is coming in a few weeks | 14:10 |
| jbernard | specifically teh week of October 27 | 14:10 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs master: DNM: tempest-full plus cinder-tempest-plugin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/949742 | 14:10 |
| jbernard | we will likely meet on Tuesday | 14:10 |
| jbernard | we have a planning etherpad here | 14:10 |
| jbernard | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2026.1-ptg-cinder-planning | 14:11 |
| jbernard | i will be working to populate that this week | 14:11 |
| jbernard | please add topics there so that I can plan and schedule time | 14:11 |
| jbernard | #topic netapp clone across pools support | 14:12 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: ^ | 14:12 |
| rosmaita | hello | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | just need someone from NetApp to answer my question on the patch | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | hopefully there is someone here today | 14:15 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Hello. I am here | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | great! | 14:16 |
| rosmaita | please take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/958388 | 14:16 |
| Anoop_Shukla | yep, we are testing this patch on our side. once we have tested the cross pool caching works, we will respond | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | thanks, just wanted to make sure you are aware | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | ok, that's all from me | 14:19 |
| jbernard | thanks brian | 14:19 |
| jbernard | #topic driver ci | 14:19 |
| jbernard | im very much hoping we can get 3rd party ci reporting sorted this cycle | 14:20 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Have a patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/956221. This needs +2 and is ready for submission once received. Can anyone from core help with this patch? | 14:20 |
| jbernard | im happy to use a time slot at the PTG to allow collaboration on CI setups, tips, etc | 14:21 |
| simondodsley | definately need that | 14:21 |
| jbernard | ok | 14:21 |
| jbernard | i don't want to have CI exceptions become the majority, and we are definately trending in that direction | 14:23 |
| jbernard | so maybe we can share information and help everyone get this sorted at the PTG | 14:23 |
| jayaanand | hi | 14:23 |
| simondodsley | we do need some concensus on what should be reported and how/where | 14:23 |
| jbernard | if you have a working setup and you have time to document or discuss at the PTG, that would be very helpful | 14:24 |
| simondodsley | working is a variable term :D | 14:24 |
| jbernard | true | 14:24 |
| simondodsley | did the the novnc issue get fixed as that was causing all sorts of havoc in the CIs | 14:24 |
| jbernard | not sure, that would be a good bullet on the planning etherpad | 14:25 |
| agalica | When is the PCG meeting? We might find that CI information useful as well | 14:28 |
| agalica | Oh, Oct 27 | 14:28 |
| agalica | week | 14:28 |
| jbernard | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2026.1-ptg-cinder-planning | 14:28 |
| jbernard | see the header there | 14:28 |
| agalica | Super, thank you. | 14:29 |
| jbernard | it is the entire week for everyone, but each project will define a schedule what makes sense for them | 14:29 |
| agalica | ok, thank you | 14:29 |
| jbernard | it mostly depends on the content of the planning etherpad, i will schedule time to cover those topics and try maximize our time together | 14:30 |
| jbernard | historically, we meet on tuesday (and possibly wednesday depending on demand) | 14:30 |
| jbernard | we have a cross-project with ironic that i need to coordinate, ill have a concrete schedule by next meeting | 14:31 |
| wizardbit | May I bring up a patch now? | 14:34 |
| jbernard | that is all that I have for annoucments and topics | 14:34 |
| agalica | is there a new etherpad for Gazpacho reviews? | 14:35 |
| simondodsley | yes - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-gazpacho-reviews | 14:35 |
| agalica | haha, guess you just created it | 14:35 |
| jbernard | wizardbit, agalica you can put requests there ^ | 14:35 |
| jayaanand | We have multiple NetApp back porting patches. Can we bring to your attenction | 14:35 |
| simondodsley | there are manu backport patches out there waiting for stable cores to review | 14:36 |
| jayaanand | These are critical for ROSHO certification | 14:36 |
| agalica | We are looking for reviews here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963344 We are willing to review other patches too | 14:36 |
| jbernard | im looking here: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/cinder+branch:stable/2025.2 | 14:36 |
| agalica | We also need this for critical backporting | 14:37 |
| jbernard | simondodsley: is there a better filter i should be using? | 14:37 |
| simondodsley | look at 2025.1... | 14:37 |
| jbernard | ahh, there we go | 14:37 |
| jayaanand | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/961437 and review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/961436 | 14:38 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: can i filter across multiple branches? what is the query string (do you know?) | 14:38 |
| simondodsley | there are a lot for 2024.2 as well, which will only increase when the 2025.1 patches are merged | 14:38 |
| simondodsley | 15 open for 2025.1 and 10 for 2024.2 | 14:40 |
| rosmaita | i think maybe we have a dashboard you can use | 14:41 |
| agalica | @simondodsley do you still need a reviewer for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/958569 ? | 14:42 |
| rosmaita | http://tiny.cc/cinder-maintained | 14:42 |
| simondodsley | I need core reviewers | 14:42 |
| agalica | ok, thanks | 14:42 |
| wizardbit | I copied the patch from 2025.2 over to 2026.1. Is it fine to have it in both docs? | 14:42 |
| agalica | @wizardbit need a regular reviewer for your patch? | 14:42 |
| simondodsley | nice @rosmaita | 14:43 |
| rosmaita | :D | 14:43 |
| wizardbit | @agalica I believe we just need a code review | 14:43 |
| agalica | I can do that for you. It would be appreciated if you could look at our patch too, but I will review yours regardless | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | just noticed that it's missing Flamingo | 14:44 |
| simondodsley | can you get it to ignore the WIPs as well | 14:44 |
| wizardbit | Thank you @agalica! | 14:44 |
| agalica | @wizardbit are you sure you don't need a core reviewer for +2 here? I see you have two +1s for reviews | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | simondodsley: not sure, got an example? | 14:46 |
| simondodsley | there are many in Caracal that are status:WIP | 14:46 |
| simondodsley | they all look like storpool backports. | 14:46 |
| simondodsley | Not sure how a backport can be WIP | 14:47 |
| wizardbit | @agalica Sorry I'm not familiar with the process. I'm here on behalf of Erlon. I think you're right, we just need a core reviewer | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | oh, i see | 14:47 |
| wizardbit | Not sure if more reviews would help | 14:47 |
| simondodsley | @wizardbit - you need two cire reviewers and a workflow | 14:47 |
| agalica | ok, @wizardbit. I'm somewhat new as well and am not a core reviewer. I am pretty sure that's waht you need. If Erlon can review our patch it would be highly appreciated, but I don't think we can review yours as we don't have a core reviewer :( | 14:47 |
| simondodsley | anyone can review anything. to merge it needs core reviewers | 14:48 |
| simondodsley | if you review someone elses patch you are more likely to get your patches reviewed. it's a complimentary thing | 14:48 |
| agalica | Yeah simon, that's what I'm trying to do. But there's only 3 patches listed there | 14:49 |
| agalica | you need core and so does he | 14:49 |
| agalica | are there other patches we can review? The problem isn't lack of desire :) | 14:49 |
| simondodsley | we are at the start of a cycle - so there are very few patches currently. | 14:49 |
| wizardbit | We just need https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/955379 to at least be accepted (not necessarily merged) by the core reviewers, so that we can put it into our packages and expect this to be in a future release | 14:50 |
| jbernard | ok, that's all i have; anything else? | 14:51 |
| simondodsley | you did have one +2 for this but your latest upload (fixing the commit) lost that. You have to start again with the cores | 14:52 |
| simondodsley | Also you should get @whoamirajat to clarify his previous -1 | 14:52 |
| jbernard | rajat should circle back for that | 14:52 |
| jbernard | other cores will wait for rajat to confirm his concerns have been addressed | 14:52 |
| agalica | Ok. What's the best path forward to alert Rajat? Add him to the patch? Reply int he now-abandoned patch? | 14:53 |
| jbernard | he's in IST timezone, | 14:53 |
| jbernard | because he reviewed it once, he's in the CC, so a comment on the patch should reach his inbox | 14:54 |
| agalica | ok, thank you | 14:54 |
| jbernard | no problem | 14:55 |
| jbernard | ok, last call | 14:55 |
| jbernard | thanks everyone | 14:56 |
| jbernard | #endmeeting | 14:56 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Oct 8 14:56:04 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:56 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-10-08-14.06.html | 14:56 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-10-08-14.06.txt | 14:56 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-10-08-14.06.log.html | 14:56 |
| agalica | @jbernard I know the meeting is over, but if you're still around I have a quick question: would it be better in the future to update the existing patch instead of making a new one? We made a new one due to there being a significant amount of changes | 15:01 |
| agalica | It seems maybe we should have just uploaded a new patch set on the original one | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | simondodsley: dashboard updated! http://tiny.cc/cinder-maintained | 15:03 |
| simondodsley | awesome | 15:03 |
| opendevreview | Abhishek Gupta proposed openstack/cinder master: Dell PowerFlex 5.0 : Add support for Dell PowerFlex 5.0 cinder driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/950546 | 15:34 |
| *** sfinucan is now known as stephenfin | 15:44 | |
| opendevreview | anthony gamboa proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: Test Hitachi CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963005 | 17:36 |
| opendevreview | anthony gamboa proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: Test Hitachi CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963005 | 17:55 |
| erlon | rosmaita: ping | 17:56 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs master: zuul: run cinder-tempest-plugin tests too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/898965 | 19:04 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/cinder master: NFS driver: Set volume format for snapshot operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/943660 | 20:28 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/cinder master: NFS driver: Use database format in initialize_connection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/941173 | 20:28 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/cinder master: NFS driver: Fix driver fails to verify virtual size for Glance with Cinder/NFS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/941174 | 20:29 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs master: zuul: run cinder-tempest-plugin tests too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/898965 | 20:47 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs master: [DNM] Run Glance with Cinder as backend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/940482 | 20:47 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs master: [DNM] Run Glance with Cinder as backend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/940482 | 20:49 |
| opendevreview | anthony gamboa proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: Test Hitachi CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963005 | 20:54 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs master: DNM: tempest-full plus cinder-tempest-plugin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/949742 | 21:31 |
| opendevreview | anthony gamboa proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: Test Hitachi CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963005 | 21:33 |
| opendevreview | anthony gamboa proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: Test Hitachi CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963005 | 21:42 |
| opendevreview | anthony gamboa proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi: Test Hitachi CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/963005 | 21:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!