Wednesday, 2025-12-17

*** mhen_ is now known as mhen03:02
*** erlon42 is now known as erlon13:01
opendevreviewRaghavendra Tilay proposed openstack/cinder master: [WIP] HPE 3par: Fix session share issue  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/97115813:07
jbernard#startmeeting cinder14:05
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Dec 17 14:05:18 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:05
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:05
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'cinder'14:05
jbernardcourtesy ping: jungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney jbernard hemna fabiooliveira yuval tobias-urdin adiare happystacker dosaboy hillpd msaravan sp-bmilanov Luzi sfernand simondodsley  zaubea nileshthathagar flelain wizardbit agalica lutimura14:05
jbernard#topic roll call14:05
jbernardo/ hello all14:05
Saio/14:05
kaiserso/ 14:05
jbernardthis will likely be a very short one, i think many are already away for holidays14:05
Anoop_Shuklao/14:06
agalicaO/14:06
harsh0/14:06
rosmaitao/14:07
sp-bmilanovo/14:07
jayaanando/14:08
jbernard#topic annoucements14:08
jbernardoy, I've had nearly 2 weeks of snow days, still trying to get caught up on things14:09
jbernardwe have some specs still to review14:09
jbernardwe did complete the openapi reviews,14:09
jbernardi think all of them have merged and that work should now be complete14:09
jbernardthe next two wednesday meetings are canceled for holidays14:10
harshokay14:10
jbernardi hope everyone has a good holidays and enjoys the time away14:11
agalicaSounds like you’re already knee deep in yours14:11
agalica;)14:11
jbernardi has not been the december i was hoping for so far lol :P14:12
jbernard#topic open discussion14:12
jbernardi dont have anything specific14:12
jbernardim behind on spec reviews, but trying to get to those this wekk14:13
jbernardunless there is anything, we can wrap14:16
kaisersi have a small question14:16
jbernardsure14:16
kaisersI have been working on doing a range of fixes on the quobyte driver after the CI is no re-created. i am torn between having these fixes stand separately or having them in a dependency chain, is there a preferred way?14:17
jbernardi think you have 2 ways you can choose14:18
jbernardyou can create a dependency chain, which is just the stack of patches you have committed locally14:18
jbernardor you can submit them seperately and use depends-on in the commit message to indicate dependencies14:19
jbernardi *think* the first option is easier14:19
kaisersok, depends-on is a good point14:19
jbernardas far as preferred, as long as the commits are well formed and passing zuul, i think whatever you choose is okay14:20
kaisersok, thnx.14:20
sp-bmilanovhi, one question from me -- what's the latest approach to requesting reviews? did https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/847536 fall through the cracks at some point? it was on the etherpad lists for dalmatian, epoxy, and flamingo, and at some point was the first thing in the etherpad for gazpacho, now it's way way down? all points raised by Cinder Core have been discussed and agreed on for a year now14:20
sp-bmilanovI see the review festival etherpad, can I just add changes there directly?14:22
jbernardsp-bmilanov: still teh same, i dont think the position in the pad indicates importance14:22
jbernardsp-bmilanov: it's a larger change (by the numbers) so it probably doesn't get caught by the festival filter14:23
harshWill we have the festival review meeting this friday ?14:24
sp-bmilanovjbernard: ah, right14:24
kaisersjust typed that, too14:24
jbernardrosmaita, eharney, yall are on the reviewer list, can this be added to the queue14:25
jbernardsp-bmilanov: it does have 2 unresolved comments, resolving those would help14:25
jbernardreviewers may be waiting for those to go away14:25
jbernardi will be out friday, rosmaita - what's your position on the festival?14:25
rosmaitai will be around, we can still have it14:26
jbernardok, sp-bmilanov that may be a good place to get feedback14:27
sp-bmilanovI don't think I can do anything useful with the unresolved comments, they are waiting for some feedback that has still not come back14:27
agalicaThe one where rosmaita ruins christmas14:28
sp-bmilanovjbernard: good idea14:28
jbernardsp-bmilanov: ok, let fernando know when you can, the friday meeting might be the best place14:29
jbernardagalica: if it has to be somebody, i think rosmaita is the best choice14:29
rosmaita:D14:30
agalicaHaha14:30
jbernard:)14:30
erlon\o late14:34
jbernarderlon: that's okay, got anything?14:35
jbernardwe're ready to wrap up if not14:35
jbernardalright,14:38
jbernardenjoy the break everyone, happy holidays and new year14:38
erlonnothing particularly14:38
erlonsp-bmilanov Ill add your patch to my review queue14:38
jbernarderlon: thanks14:38
jbernarderlon: rosmaita is holding the review festival friday as well14:39
jbernardok, that's it14:39
jbernard#endmeeting14:39
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Dec 17 14:39:20 2025 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:39
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-12-17-14.05.html14:39
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-12-17-14.05.txt14:39
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-12-17-14.05.log.html14:39
sp-bmilanovthanks jbernard!14:40
erlonsp-bmilanov what protocol did your driver supported before the patch? nfs?14:43
sp-bmilanova StorPool-proprietary block protocol14:43
erlonSo you guys have a nova connector for that14:44
sp-bmilanovyep14:45
sp-bmilanov> erlon: sp-bmilanov Ill add your patch to my review queue14:53
sp-bmilanovoh, cool, thanks, I just saw that14:53
sp-bmilanovsfernand: ping re: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/847536 some outstanding comments (else we can discuss them on Friday)15:03
cardoejbernard: how can I get https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/961436 in the review pipeline? I put it on the etherpad you previously mentioned15:17
noonedeadpunkrosmaita: hey! do you have any suggestions around how to approach this spec in a better way about changing config? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/96230615:37
rosmaitanoonedeadpunk: looking15:39
noonedeadpunkand in the implementation a folk pointed out that sucxh possibility overall would be helpful and they do it in their downstream driver15:39
noonedeadpunkI'm really open to suggestions/discussion around this one...15:40
rosmaitawill need to think some more, left a few minor comments though for now16:19
rosmaitanoonedeadpunk: ^^16:19
noonedeadpunk++16:20
noonedeadpunkwill address them16:21
jbernardcardoe: well, i hope the review priority will help, there is a review meeting on friday (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-festival-of-reviews), that is probably the best place to ask this week16:27
cardoeokay thanks16:28
jbernardcardoe: i will have quite a bit of time over the holidays and planning to go through the review etherpad as well16:28
jbernardcardoe: is it there as well?16:28
jbernardcardoe: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-gazpacho-reviews16:29
cardoeyep. It's under jayaanand's name16:29
jbernardcardoe: ok, great16:29
cardoeIt's also under my name16:29
cardoeUnder the backports section16:30
cardoeIt's already been backported to 2025.2 just looking for it to go to 2025.116:30
jbernardkk16:30
cardoeFolks gave some review cause they disagreed with some of it. But then they pointed out its on master and backported to 2025.2 so they removed their -116:30
cardoeThe part that people don't like isn't what I need. It's got the side effect of fixing multi-attach generically for Ironic.16:31
jbernardok, should be relatively easy then16:33

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!