| opendevreview | Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph master: Fix cephadm fail to find lvm device when creating OSDs in Ubuntu Noble https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/990214 | 01:14 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Fernando Ferraz proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph master: Fix cephadm fail to find lvm device when creating OSDs in Ubuntu Noble https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/990214 | 01:17 |
| opendevreview | JaeSeong-Shin proposed openstack/cinder master: Improve Dell PowerStore driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990226 | 02:27 |
| opendevreview | JaeSeong-Shin proposed openstack/cinder master: Improve Dell PowerStore driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990226 | 04:47 |
| opendevreview | JaeSeong-Shin proposed openstack/cinder master: Improve Dell PowerStore driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990226 | 05:25 |
| auniyal | CI is blocked `2026-05-26 20:01:58.985250 | ubuntu-noble | cinder/volume/manager.py:307: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment | 08:24 |
| auniyal | 2026-05-26 20:01:58.985278 | ubuntu-noble | [unused-ignore] | 08:24 |
| auniyal | 2026-05-26 20:01:58.985282 | ubuntu-noble | rpu = requests.packages.urllib3 # type: ignore | 08:24 |
| auniyal | 2026-05-26 20:01:58.985285 | ubuntu-noble | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``` | 08:24 |
| auniyal | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990130 fixes it | 08:24 |
| auniyal | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=cinder-mypy&skip=0 | 08:32 |
| opendevreview | minwoo seo proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Add spec for cinder-manage image-cache subcommand https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/986741 | 09:47 |
| minu | a | 10:09 |
| minu | Hi Cinder folks, I added an admin-only cinder-manage image-cache warm/list command to pre-populate and inspect the image-volume cache. The spec and implementation are both passing Zuul now and ready for review. Could someone take a look, or advise whether the spec should be approved before the implementation? Spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/986741 Impl: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/986740 | 10:32 |
| minu | Hi Cinder folks, I added an admin-only cinder-manage image-cache warm/list command to pre-populate/inspect the image-volume cache. Spec and implementation both pass Zuul and are ready for review. Could someone take a look? | 10:32 |
| minu | Spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/986741 Impl: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/986740 | 10:33 |
| minu | Hi Cinder folks, I added an admin-only cinder-manage image-cache warm/list command to pre-populate/inspect the image-volume cache. Spec and implementation both pass Zuul and are ready for review. Could someone take a look? | 10:35 |
| minu | Spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/986741 Impl: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/986740 | 10:35 |
| minu | Hi Cinder folks, I added an admin-only cinder-manage image-cache warm/list command to pre-populate/inspect the image-volume cache. Spec and implementation both pass Zuul and are ready for review. Could someone take a look? | 10:36 |
| minu | Spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/986741 Impl: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/986740 | 10:36 |
| minu | Hi Cinder folks, could someone review my cinder-manage image-cache warm/list changes? Spec 986741 and implementation 986740 both pass Zuul now. | 10:37 |
| minu | Hi Cinder folks, I added an admin-only cinder-manage image-cache warm/list command to pre-populate/inspect the image-volume cache. Spec and implementation both pass Zuul and are ready for review. Could someone take a look? | 10:46 |
| minu | Spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/986741 Impl: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/986740 | 10:46 |
| fungi | auniyal: jbernard: maybe better if we coordinate here since neither of you are in the #openstack-infra channel, but i gather from chatter in launchpad's matrix room that you want to add a bug template to the cinder project on lp? | 12:21 |
| opendevreview | Nimesh Desai proposed openstack/cinder master: [SVf]: Enable support to extend a volume with snapshot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/912053 | 12:23 |
| fungi | jbernard should already have permission to do that, since he's in ~cinder drivers there. it's probably a good idea if rosmaita sets jbernard as an administrator in that team too, so that he can add and clean up other members in it when needed | 12:25 |
| rosmaita | fungi: ack | 12:26 |
| fungi | thanks rosmaita! | 12:26 |
| auniyal | fungi, yeah I was trying that | 12:26 |
| auniyal | ack | 12:26 |
| fungi | that saves me needing to temporarily add myself as an admin in that team | 12:27 |
| fungi | auniyal: so, short answer is we have what we need to be able to do that as long as we coordinate. i'll leave it up to jbernard to decide who to add and remove in ~cinder-drivers since that's his responsibility as ptl and i don't want to second-guess him | 12:29 |
| fungi | auniyal: i also just saw your openstacl/releases change, i left a review comment but release liaison tracking is in the midst of moving to the governance repo now | 12:47 |
| opendevreview | Anthony Galica proposed openstack/cinder master: [Hitachi] Fixes bug where reclaiming space does not occur automatically. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/989640 | 12:52 |
| opendevreview | Anthony Galica proposed openstack/cinder master: [Hitachi] Fixes bug where reclaiming space does not occur automatically. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/989640 | 12:58 |
| opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/cinder master: Add CI jobs to run unit tests with native threading (no-eventlet) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/988746 | 13:06 |
| opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/cinder master: Add CI jobs to run functional tests with native threading (no-eventlet) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/988747 | 13:06 |
| opendevreview | Eric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Bump mypy to 2.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990291 | 13:28 |
| opendevreview | Vijay Jatti proposed openstack/cinder master: run-HPE Storage CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990292 | 13:30 |
| opendevreview | Vijay Jatti proposed openstack/cinder master: [DNM]: Testing cinder ci https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990292 | 13:40 |
| *** erlon0 is now known as erlon | 13:41 | |
| auniyal | oh okay, fungi thanks for looking | 13:52 |
| jbernard | #startmeeting cinder | 14:03 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed May 27 14:03:42 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:03 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:03 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:03 |
| jbernard | courtesy ping: jungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney jbernard hemna fabiooliveira yuval tobias-urdin adiare happystacker dosaboy hillpd msaravan sp-bmilanov Luzi sfernand simondodsley zaubea nileshthathagar flelain wizardbit agalica lutimura kaisers aloke_dev Anoop_Shukla erlon | 14:03 |
| jbernard | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-hibiscus-meetings | 14:04 |
| jbernard | #topic roll call | 14:04 |
| agalica | o/ | 14:04 |
| auniyal | o/ | 14:04 |
| opendevreview | norman shen proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix failing to cascade delete volume if deleted admin snapshot db item exists https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990297 | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | o/ | 14:05 |
| opendevreview | norman shen proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix failing to cascade delete volume if deleted admin snapshot db item exists https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/985907 | 14:05 |
| raghavendrat | hi | 14:06 |
| * jungleboyj is lurking | 14:06 | |
| erlon | \o | 14:06 |
| harsh_ailani | o/ | 14:06 |
| Jyotsna | \o | 14:07 |
| agalica | o\ | 14:08 |
| jbernard | ok, let's go | 14:08 |
| jbernard | #topic annoucements | 14:08 |
| jbernard | rosmaita: welcome back, periodic jobs still look good | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | \o/ | 14:10 |
| jbernard | we need to have a midcycle :) | 14:10 |
| jbernard | next friday is our festival of reviews, we *could* use that slot | 14:10 |
| jbernard | wait, that might be this friday | 14:11 |
| jbernard | nope, next friday | 14:11 |
| agalica | nah, this friday is the 29th | 14:11 |
| jbernard | opinions, objections? | 14:12 |
| agalica | I think it makes sense since we're still early in the whole cycle | 14:12 |
| agalica | earlyish | 14:13 |
| auniyal | added few patches there which can be landed, also shall we add these etherpads in channel topic/description so there are always for others | 14:13 |
| agalica | Billie Earlyish | 14:13 |
| auniyal | meeting etherpad, review festival etherpad | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | auniyal: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-useful-links is at the top of the meeting agenda | 14:14 |
| auniyal | *so they are always for handy others | 14:14 |
| auniyal | yeah this should go in description this has all | 14:15 |
| jbernard | i need to gain permission to set the topic, i dont think i have that currently, but i agree it's something we should do | 14:15 |
| auniyal | so right now we have --- "The Block Storage Project | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder | https://tiny.cc/CinderPriorities" - they are meaningful but Cinderprioties are clearly not looked at since long | 14:16 |
| jbernard | yeah, im not sure who to ask about irc perms | 14:16 |
| rosmaita | probably in #openstack-infra | 14:17 |
| auniyal | fungi ^^ | 14:18 |
| jbernard | #action jbernard to update cinder irc topic | 14:18 |
| jbernard | just to circle back quickly, no opposition to using our festival slot next week for a midcycle? | 14:18 |
| fungi | #link https://opendev.org/openstack/project-config/src/branch/master/accessbot/channels.yaml Accessbot configuration | 14:19 |
| auniyal | 👍 | 14:19 |
| auniyal | jbernard may be hash-startvote ? I am 👍 | 14:21 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Most of folks in India will be on holiday this Friday..can we have mid cycle reviews next week? | 14:21 |
| agalica | Anoop: we are talking about next week | 14:22 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Okay..got it..thanks! Next week works | 14:22 |
| jbernard | Anoop_Shukla: the friday we're looking at is June 5 | 14:22 |
| jbernard | #startvote Midcycle next Friday? (+1, 0 -1) | 14:23 |
| opendevmeet | Begin voting on: Midcycle next Friday? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, . | 14:23 |
| opendevmeet | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 14:23 |
| agalica | #vote +1 | 14:24 |
| Anoop_Shukla | #vote +1 | 14:24 |
| auniyal | #vote +1 JUne 5 | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | auniyal: +1 JUne 5 is not a valid option. Valid options are , +1, 0, -1, . | 14:24 |
| auniyal | #vote +1 | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | auniyal: +1 is not a valid option. Valid options are , +1, 0, -1, . | 14:24 |
| agalica | what does voting a period mean | 14:24 |
| auniyal | +1 | 14:24 |
| jbernard | not sure, give it a try :) | 14:24 |
| agalica | #vote . | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | agalica: . is not a valid option. Valid options are , +1, 0, -1, . | 14:24 |
| agalica | ah, the bot just doesn't know how to figure out if it should add extra commas I guess | 14:25 |
| agalica | #vote +1 | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | #vote +1 | 14:25 |
| auniyal | just +1 or -1 | 14:25 |
| agalica | or 0 :D | 14:25 |
| erlon | #vote +1 | 14:25 |
| jayaanand | #vote +1 | 14:25 |
| jbernard | #vote +1 | 14:26 |
| jbernard | fungi: i just needs ops to set topic, correct? admin is not necessary? | 14:27 |
| jbernard | ok, last call for votes | 14:27 |
| fungi | jbernard: yes | 14:27 |
| jbernard | fungi: k, thankx | 14:28 |
| jbernard | #endvote | 14:28 |
| opendevmeet | Voted on "Midcycle next Friday?" Results are | 14:28 |
| opendevmeet | +1 (6): agalica, jbernard, Anoop_Shukla, rosmaita, jayaanand, erlon | 14:28 |
| fungi | jbernard: the docs are at https://docs.opendev.org/opendev/system-config/latest/irc.html#accessbot | 14:28 |
| jbernard | #agree Midcycle will take the place of our next review festival on June 5, 1400-1600 | 14:29 |
| fungi | (also the "Basic Channel Operator Commands" section below there has an example of how a chanop can set the topic through chanserv) | 14:29 |
| jbernard | fungi: perfect, thanks exactly what i need | 14:30 |
| jbernard | next annoucement, erlon and anthony's core nominations have been fully supported, | 14:31 |
| erlon | \o/ thanks for the upvoting guys | 14:31 |
| agalica | nice! thanks all | 14:31 |
| jbernard | welcome to the core review team, erlon and agalica ! | 14:31 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Congratulations Erlon and Agalica! | 14:32 |
| Jyotsna | Congratulations erlon and agalica !! | 14:32 |
| jbernard | #action jbernard to update and verify the gerrit core group to include erlon and anthony today | 14:32 |
| jayaanand | Congratulations Erlon and Agalica 👍 | 14:33 |
| nimeshdesai | Congratulations erlon and agalica, well deserved | 14:33 |
| rosmaita | \o/ | 14:33 |
| auniyal | congats | 14:33 |
| hong-p[m] | 👍️ | 14:34 |
| jbernard | #topic release liason | 14:35 |
| jbernard | rosmaita, auniyal has offered to help on this responsibility | 14:35 |
| jbernard | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/990281 | 14:35 |
| auniyal | yeah as fungi explained - I need to redo it | 14:36 |
| fungi | yeah, as i mentioned in here earlier, you'll want to set that in governance now | 14:37 |
| fungi | very new change in process, as of this week (though it's been under discussion between the release team and tc for some time already) | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | no objection from me, will be happy to have the help | 14:38 |
| jbernard | nice, auniyal it's yours, thanks for stepping in to help | 14:39 |
| auniyal | o7 | 14:39 |
| jbernard | #topic bug template in Launchpad for new bug submissions, attempting to reduce the back-and-forth of collecting sufficient information | 14:40 |
| jbernard | I personally support it, i don't know how launchpad does templates, but I believe nova has something of this nature already in place | 14:40 |
| fungi | it's a setting in the bug options for the project in lp | 14:41 |
| agalica | you are a very useful mushroom | 14:41 |
| fungi | there's basically a text field where you paste in the text you want new bug descriptions prefilled with | 14:41 |
| auniyal | yep , so cinder-driver can add/update the template - I'll share it | 14:41 |
| jbernard | excellent | 14:42 |
| erlon | jbernard: I couldnt find the agenda for today. I have a quick item I wanted to squeeze in | 14:42 |
| jbernard | erlon: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-hibiscus-meetings | 14:43 |
| auniyal | pls let me know whom to share with - its too long for irc text | 14:43 |
| jbernard | auniyal: the template contents? | 14:44 |
| auniyal | https://launchpad.net/~cinder-drivers/+members#active jbernard rosmaita | 14:44 |
| auniyal | yes | 14:44 |
| fungi | (side note: we have both paste.opendev.org and therpad.opendev.org for sharing or collaborating on larger volumes of text than will fit in irc messages) | 14:44 |
| auniyal | yep | 14:44 |
| jbernard | fungi: is clearly the MVP of today's meeting | 14:45 |
| jbernard | auniyal: yeah, that sounds good | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | auniyal: go ahead and put your proposed template into paste.opendev.org so we can all look at it | 14:45 |
| auniyal | ack | 14:46 |
| jbernard | so the ask here is, do we agree that we're asking for enough info and not making the bug submission process too cumbersome | 14:46 |
| auniyal | so it should not be, my intetion is to minimally/atleast get reproducer steps and the version bug is being reported | 14:47 |
| auniyal | alon with logs - this info should be easy to collect and paste in bugs | 14:48 |
| auniyal | report | 14:48 |
| jbernard | and version info | 14:48 |
| auniyal | yeah like which stable-branch (downstream specific) or master - they saw the bug | 14:50 |
| jbernard | yes, it may be in the logs but would be nice to have that elevated so we dont have to dig | 14:51 |
| jbernard | #action auniyal to post template content so we can all look | 14:54 |
| jbernard | erlon: you're up | 14:54 |
| jbernard | #topic stable grenade skip level always failures | 14:54 |
| jbernard | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=grenade-skip-level-always&branch=stable%2F2025.2&skip=0 | 14:54 |
| erlon | so, I was checking on patch on 2025.2 and the CI is failing constently on the grenade-skip-level-always job | 14:54 |
| erlon | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=grenade-skip-level-always&branch=stable%2F2025.2&skip=0 | 14:55 |
| jbernard | seems to fail for all of us | 14:55 |
| erlon | The last patch that passes (and has the fix) was not accepted | 14:55 |
| erlon | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/989786 | 14:56 |
| erlon | "2024.2 is EOL so we should just remove this job", thoud the patch was for 2025.2 | 14:56 |
| erlon | is it eol too? | 14:56 |
| fungi | 2025.2 is not eol | 14:57 |
| jbernard | 2024.* is | 14:57 |
| jbernard | 2025.2 is still supported | 14:58 |
| fungi | 2024.2 is eol, 2024.1 is "unmaintained" (but still open) | 14:58 |
| jbernard | we should probably fix that, right? rosmaita ^ | 14:58 |
| erlon | ow, wait, your recomendation there was just to update that line right? | 14:58 |
| fungi | #link https://releases.openstack.org/ Current maintenance state of OpenStack project branches | 14:58 |
| erlon | the patch is valid with that | 14:59 |
| jbernard | ahh, nm | 14:59 |
| jbernard | slurp | 14:59 |
| jbernard | erlon: how can we help get this resolved? | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | i think the point is that grenade-skip-level doesn't make sense for 2025.2 because it would upgrade from 2024.2, which does not exist anymore | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | so that's why the change has to be made in stable/2025.2 | 15:00 |
| fungi | correct, technically grenade-skip-level isn't required for any *.2 releases because it exists to test upgrades between *.1 (slurp) releases | 15:01 |
| fungi | *.2 releases only need to test normal grenade upgrades to the next *.1 release | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | but i think the change should happen in the template? | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | we don't directly configure grenade-skip-level (i don't think) | 15:02 |
| erlon | jbernard: im trying to figure out hoiw to fix those and get the stable jobs passing. 2025.1 is failling as well | 15:02 |
| erlon | rosmaita: so would we need to make the job non-voting? | 15:03 |
| rosmaita | i guess that would be a short-term fix | 15:04 |
| fungi | the branch list is set in the tempest repo | 15:05 |
| erlon | how about 2025.1? that should be required right? if the fix isnt that complicated, I could try to fix 2025.1 and 2025.2 since I already will work on 2025.1 | 15:05 |
| fungi | #link https://opendev.org/openstack/tempest/src/branch/master/zuul.d/integrated-gate.yaml#L501-L506 branches for grenade-skip-level-always | 15:05 |
| fungi | er, i guess it's farther down in that file you actually want, in the integrated-gate-storage template | 15:06 |
| fungi | grenade-skip-level is set to test changes for 2024.1 there, and grenade-skip-level-always tests 2025.1 and 2026.1 changes | 15:07 |
| fungi | we'll need to do some spelunking to figure out how it's ended up getting applied to 2025.2 changes | 15:09 |
| fungi | probably worth bringing up with the folks in #openstack-qa | 15:10 |
| erlon | right, I suppose those kind of changes cannot be tested with gerrit patches+dependencies do they? | 15:10 |
| fungi | aha, found it | 15:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/cinder master: Remove unused type ignore for requests.packages.urllib3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990130 | 15:11 |
| erlon | I remember that there was some projects that would only affect after the change were moist | 15:11 |
| gmaan | we removed the grenade-skip-level-always from 2025.2 | 15:11 |
| gmaan | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/990152 | 15:11 |
| erlon | "Remove unused type ignore for requests.packages.urllib3"? | 15:11 |
| gmaan | if that is something you were asking for | 15:11 |
| auniyal | or this - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/976105 | 15:12 |
| erlon | ah, sorry | 15:12 |
| erlon | clicked the wrond link | 15:12 |
| fungi | yeash, so fixed yesterday | 15:12 |
| fungi | though it ran again today | 15:13 |
| fungi | oh, but only on swift, so they're probably adding it somewhere else themselves | 15:13 |
| erlon | ok, ill try again today. on 2025.1 (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/989550) granade was failling as well. not sure if it was the same reason | 15:14 |
| auniyal | I thinkthis might be the culprit it changes setuptools in 2025.2 only - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/976105 | 15:15 |
| auniyal | by looking at logs here - https://23e156ac1bd829e81611-6ac4a54b3a9261cc3d1dc9362057083e.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/openstack/da81098e3fb149a29e184f3bb8046d5a/job-output.txt | 15:15 |
| gmaan | ohk so it was not removed for 2025.1 and that is why it is running on 2025.1 and might be failing as it test 2024.1 -> 2025.1 upgrade | 15:16 |
| auniyal | if you look at around tile 2026-05-27 10:07:43 | 15:16 |
| gmaan | if nobody to fix the 2024.1 which is unmaintained then we can remove it from 2025.1, maybe elodilles can check as he was working on making grenade jobs green | 15:17 |
| jbernard | removing it from 2025.1 make sense to me, but we can wait for elodilles to weigh in | 15:23 |
| jbernard | that is all for agenda for today, anything ad hoc to discuss? | 15:24 |
| Jyotsna | We had re-proposed the new HPE AlletraMP driver 2 weeks back https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/969373 and received feedback from reviewer eharney for zuul openstack-tox-docs job failure and we addressed it. We need attention from core reviewers to review the patch and for approvals. Its been long time we are working on new driver and seek attention so we could make it for this release. | 15:25 |
| erlon | ok, since theres work on that already, Ill sit on the window and try to understand the whole thing | 15:25 |
| erlon | gmaan++ fungi++ thanks for the input. let me know if I can help with anything | 15:26 |
| opendevreview | Abhishek Gupta proposed openstack/cinder master: Dell PowerFlex : Fix multiple broken functions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/950546 | 15:28 |
| Jyotsna | May i request ack from core reviewers for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/969373 | 15:28 |
| jbernard | all: I posted an etherpad for next week's midcycle: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-hibiscus-midcycles | 15:28 |
| jbernard | Jyotsna: ^ your request added there | 15:29 |
| jbernard | in case it needs wider discussion | 15:29 |
| Jyotsna | thanks Jon | 15:29 |
| jbernard | no problem, we're over time by quite a bit, last call everyone | 15:32 |
| jbernard | #endmeeting | 15:32 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed May 27 15:32:52 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:32 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-05-27-14.03.html | 15:32 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-05-27-14.03.txt | 15:32 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-05-27-14.03.log.html | 15:32 |
| agalica | zuul cinder mypy is currently failing - is this a known issue? | 16:14 |
| jbernard | agalica: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990130 | 16:44 |
| agalica | jbernard: thanks, so just rebase? | 16:46 |
| agalica | or will it work automagically? | 16:47 |
| jbernard | it should pick it up in the gate since it's merged now | 16:48 |
| agalica | rgr | 16:48 |
| jbernard | but you may have to request a recheck for that job | 16:49 |
| agalica | yeah, I figured. I'm making a modification anyway, so I"ll wait | 16:49 |
| opendevreview | Eric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove mypy-wrap.sh https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/985038 | 17:01 |
| opendevreview | Florian proposed openstack/cinder master: fix: backup stuck in creating on losing DB connection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/990344 | 17:44 |
| opendevreview | Anthony Galica proposed openstack/cinder master: [Hitachi] Fixes bug where reclaiming space does not occur automatically. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/989640 | 18:14 |
| fungi | jbernard: your chanop perms deployed about an hour ago, so you should be able to follow the instructions i linked earlier for changing the channel topic now | 18:36 |
| jbernard | fungi: great, thank you | 18:37 |
| fungi | yw! | 18:38 |
| opendevreview | Walt proposed openstack/cinder master: Implement graceful shutdown for Cinder services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/989836 | 20:59 |
| opendevreview | norman shen proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix failing to cascade delete volume if deleted admin snapshot db item exists https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/985907 | 21:44 |
| opendevreview | Anthony Galica proposed openstack/cinder master: [Hitachi] Fixes bug where reclaiming space does not occur automatically. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/989640 | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!