| opendevreview | Jyotsna Lothe proposed openstack/cinder master: HPE AlletraMP driver : Online clone synchronous wait for copy increases bulk VM provisioning time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1008049 | 03:32 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Jyotsna Lothe proposed openstack/cinder master: HPE AlletraMP driver : Online clone synchronous wait for copy, increases bulk VM provisioning time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1008049 | 03:52 |
| opendevreview | Jyotsna Lothe proposed openstack/cinder master: HPE AlletraMP driver : Online clone synchronous wait for copy, increases bulk VM provisioning time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1008049 | 03:59 |
| opendevreview | Jyotsna Lothe proposed openstack/cinder master: HPE Alletra MP: Skip sync wait for same-size clones https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1008049 | 04:03 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin master: Scenario: Verify secondary failback writes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/1008200 | 06:00 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Improve volume delete error message https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/989004 | 06:26 |
| auniyal | zuul is not running jobs with recheck, fungi any ideas | 06:34 |
| opendevreview | Jyotsna Lothe proposed openstack/cinder master: HPE AlletraMP driver : Online clone synchronous wait for copy, increases bulk VM provisioning time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1008049 | 07:08 |
| frickler | auniyal: do you have an example? usually this happens for changes that need a rebase | 07:27 |
| auniyal | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status?change=995934 | 07:29 |
| auniyal | frickler so these 2 patch might be good examples https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status?change=995934&change=989004 | 07:30 |
| sp-bmilanov | hey simondodsley, I see your third-party CI logs ( https://github.com/Everpure-Zuul-CI/Cinder-CI/tree/gh-pages ) .. why Github? Easiest to manage? | 07:34 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: RBD: Update volume location on failover https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1007306 | 07:35 |
| sp-bmilanov | also, how did you set up your current iteration? is it sill SoftwareFactory? | 07:35 |
| -opendevstatus- NOTICE: zuul processing is broken since about 03:00 UTC, investigation is in progress, please be patient | 08:01 | |
| opendevreview | Markus Hentsch proposed openstack/cinder master: Adopt image encryption standardization https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/926298 | 08:14 |
| *** tobias-u1 is now known as tobias-urdin | 08:19 | |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: RBD: Update volume location on failover https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1007306 | 09:13 |
| opendevreview | Raghavendra Tilay proposed openstack/cinder master: DNM - 2026_10_07 - please ignore https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009171 | 09:18 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: RBD: Update volume location on failover https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1007306 | 09:20 |
| opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/cinder master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1007399 | 12:17 |
| rosmaita | Cinder meeting in #openstack-cinder at 1400 UTC | 13:56 |
| rosmaita | jungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney jbernard hemna fabiooliveira yuval tobias-urdin adiare happystacker dosaboy hillpd msaravan sp-bmilanov Luzi sfernand simondodsley zaubea nileshthathagar flelain wizardbit agalica lutimura kaisers aloke_dev Anoop_Shukla erlon Jyotsna | 13:56 |
| Jyotsna | o/ | 13:59 |
| simondodsley | o/ | 14:00 |
| eduardomorais[m] | \o | 14:00 |
| rosmaita | wait, let me start the meeting | 14:00 |
| rosmaita | #startmeeting cinder | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Oct 7 14:00:53 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rosmaita. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:00 |
| rosmaita | #topic roll call | 14:01 |
| agalica_ | o/ | 14:01 |
| fqi | o/ | 14:01 |
| harsh | o/ | 14:01 |
| rosmaita | (glad to see people are so excited to get the meeting started) | 14:01 |
| hvlcchao1 | o/ | 14:01 |
| eduardomorais[m] | \o | 14:01 |
| sp-bmilanov | o/ | 14:01 |
| Jyotsna | 0/ | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | hello everyone | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | not much on the agenda today except for the PTG | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | but there is quite a bit to discuss there | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | #topic announcements | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | Indri Project Team Gathering is next week, Oct 12-16 | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | go to https://openinfra.org/ptg/ and hit the "Register Now!" button | 14:03 |
| Anoop_Shukla | O/ | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | you will get a free ticket, that you don't really need for anything | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | i think the point of registering is so that you read and agree to the code of conduct | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | link to that is at the bottom of the registration page | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | but i don't think that you are required to say that you read the code of conduct to get your ticket | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | anyway, the code of conduct is basically don't be a jerk during the PTG | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | also, the foundation likes to know how many people are participating | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | so, please register | 14:06 |
| simondodsley | (so we can plan for in-person in the future hopefully) | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | would definitely be nice to have in-person PTGs again! | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | ok, that's all for announcements | 14:07 |
| simondodsley | the more people that say this to the Foundation the better | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | simondodsley: that is a good point, there is usually a feedback etherpad for general PTG comments | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | maybe you can remind us at some point during the week to leave a comment about in-person meeting on it | 14:08 |
| agalica_ | So I can then post my dissent, haha | 14:08 |
| rosmaita | agalica_: that is your right | 14:08 |
| simondodsley | misery | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | simondodsley: this would be a good time for you to explain why people in the cinder community are referred to as "Argonauts" | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | i wonder how many people here know | 14:10 |
| simondodsley | lol - yes | 14:10 |
| simondodsley | but i think i forgot... let me try and remember as it was my idea in the first place i think | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | it was! | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | i can explain | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | if you look on our launchpad page, you can see the cinder mascot: https://launchpad.net/cinder | 14:12 |
| simondodsley | oh - i remember | 14:12 |
| agalica_ | Simon has been away from contact for so long that his brain has begun to calcify!!! Argh!!! | 14:12 |
| simondodsley | It's to do with the OpenStack release Xena | 14:12 |
| rosmaita | which is a horse presenting his backend to the viewer, as a reminder that the backends are really important for the block storage service | 14:12 |
| simondodsley | Xena's horse awas called Argo | 14:12 |
| sp-bmilanov | :D | 14:13 |
| agalica_ | lol | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | that's right, we had a vote at the xena ptg to name the mascot, and "Argo" won | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | and as a bonus, people in the cinder community can be called "Argonauts" | 14:13 |
| simondodsley | All we need is a PTL called Jason | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | i don't remember the other names proposed, but the "Argonauts" connection seemed to be a deciding factor | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | we definitely need a PTL named Jason! | 14:14 |
| simondodsley | it was 5 years ago - hence why I had swapped that part out | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | yeah, 10 development cycles ago is a long time | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | ok, now you are all clued in to the Argonauts references | 14:16 |
| rosmaita | #topic PTG organization | 14:16 |
| rosmaita | ok, so most people will have this channel open in IRC during the PTG, so you can probably find people here | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | but the general PTG channel is #openinfra-events | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | projects will announce what discussions are happening, stuff like that | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | so it's good to keep that one open, too | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | the schedule for the entire thing, list of etherpads, etc is at | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | #link https://ptg.opendev.org/ | 14:18 |
| Anoop_Shukla | I have a question on the security side of things - We flagged some drivers security stand during Hibiscus. There are some gaps that were also brought up - CHAP authentication be default. Also many drivers do not support DH-HMAC-CHAP for NVMe. In PTG, can we decide what is our stand on these two open items? | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | cinder will meet in the "ocata" room from tuesday through friday | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | Anoop_Shukla: yes, that is a good topic | 14:19 |
| simondodsley | @Anoop_Shukla: that will be part of the ironic cross-project I suspect | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-indri-ptg-planning | 14:20 |
| rosmaita | ok, so as far as what times we are meeting ... | 14:20 |
| rosmaita | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-ptg-timeslots-fall | 14:20 |
| rosmaita | so if you open that page, you can see what our options are | 14:21 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Thanks @simondodsley - missed that part of the etherpad. | 14:21 |
| Anoop_Shukla | But I did not get - why it’s part of ironic-cinder discussion and not on cinder itself? Do we have a dependency? | 14:22 |
| simondodsley | probbaly not - but whatever ironic need to do will affect os-brick which we control | 14:22 |
| simondodsley | if we decided to do HMAC before TLS and they went the other way, that would be a problem | 14:23 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Okay got it | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | so, that is a good point about scheduling, namely that we have to schedule some sessions with other teams | 14:24 |
| rosmaita | if you look on the etherpad linked earlier, line 36 | 14:24 |
| rosmaita | both ironic and manila want to meet in the 1700-1800UTC time slot | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | those are tuesday and thursday | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | so to keep the day to 4 hours, i think we should start at 1400UTC on tuesday and thursday | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | which is good for agalica_ but maybe not for people on the other end of the time zone spread | 14:26 |
| simondodsley | i won't be able to attend on Tuesday, so anything I have suggested needs to be Thursday | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | so the question here is what to do about wednesday and friday, start at 1300 or 1400 ? | 14:26 |
| simondodsley | stick with the same time - 1400 | 14:27 |
| auniyal2 | it would be nice to be done by 16 UTC | 14:27 |
| agalica_ | I vote 2300 across the board | 14:27 |
| auniyal2 | so I prefer to start as early as possible - 13 | 14:28 |
| auniyal2 | in case it get streched | 14:28 |
| simondodsley | tbh i have no preference - i ws just trying to suggest consistency | 14:28 |
| agalica_ | I’m picturing auniyal2 getting stretched on one of those medieval torture devices now | 14:29 |
| auniyal2 | :D | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | if we meet > 4 hours on any one day, you don't need to imagine a special kind of torture device | 14:29 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Can we keep the same time as IRC meetings this works for the other side of hemisphere more or less as well | 14:30 |
| rosmaita | Anoop_Shukla: that's a good point, so that would be 1400 UTC | 14:30 |
| auniyal2 | yeah, 1400 is fine if all agree | 14:31 |
| agalica_ | 1400 pacific is fine by me | 14:31 |
| agalica_ | :D | 14:32 |
| rosmaita | agalica_: you are not helping | 14:32 |
| rosmaita | ok, let's reserve the 1400 through 1700 blocks (that is, ending at 1800 UTC) for tuesday-friday | 14:33 |
| rosmaita | i will try to schedule only 3 hours on wednesday and friday | 14:33 |
| agalica_ | Will Friday be “open discussion” like normal, or is it a packed ptg? | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | should be pretty open, plus it's a Festival of Reviews day | 14:34 |
| agalica_ | Right | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | ok, thanks | 14:35 |
| rosmaita | ok, next question is where to meet | 14:35 |
| rosmaita | i am inclined to stick with google meet but am willing to entertain other suggestions | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | except from agalica_ | 14:36 |
| agalica_ | Lol | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | :D | 14:36 |
| simondodsley | messaging in google meet is blocked for me | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | just the messaging? | 14:36 |
| simondodsley | don't ask why - it makes zero sense | 14:36 |
| simondodsley | yep | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | i was about to ask why | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | ok | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | well, we tend to take notes in the etherpad | 14:37 |
| simondodsley | true | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | and we have IRC for messaging | 14:37 |
| simondodsley | in that case i'm good with google | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | i will see if i can turn off messaging on my end so that people don't start doing it by mistake | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | i believe that all current contributors have can access google meet? | 14:38 |
| rosmaita | my primary reason for using it is that the recording works really well | 14:38 |
| simondodsley | will we be allowed to use AI transcription | 14:39 |
| simondodsley | sorry, SI | 14:39 |
| Anoop_Shukla | google meet works for us at netapp | 14:39 |
| Jyotsna | it works for us as well | 14:39 |
| agalica_ | Google meet works for me, preferred in fact since it’s already set up | 14:39 |
| rosmaita | I guess we can use the transcription feature if that is useful | 14:40 |
| simondodsley | might be for for historical purposes | 14:40 |
| rosmaita | i guess it's not that different from having a recording | 14:41 |
| Anoop_Shukla | The only crib I have with google meet is, sharing is pretty complex.. | 14:42 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Sharing screen* | 14:42 |
| rosmaita | i guess i haven't noticed that | 14:43 |
| rosmaita | i think, let's stick with google meet for this PTG, and if anyone has an alternative, maybe we could test it out on Friday at the end of the ptg | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | and then use the alternative in the future | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | ok, guess we've got it all covered | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | #topic open discussion | 14:47 |
| Anoop_Shukla | @simondodsley: We were working on boot volume backup proposal some time back. Do you think it’s of importance to take up this ptg? | 14:47 |
| simondodsley | there is a lot planned for the PTG, so we could add it, but at a lower priority | 14:48 |
| rosmaita | there is a high-priority change that removes usage of sqlalchemy-utils (which we only use for one particular unit test class) | 14:48 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Yeah I agree. | 14:48 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009029 | 14:48 |
| simondodsley | I'll take a look | 14:48 |
| Jyotsna | We have few patches on priority which requires immediate attention from reviewers 1) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1008049 - Skip Online clone synchronous wait for copy, agalica,auniyal and jayaanand already review this patch and rework submitted. Required Re-review and +2 2) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1001152 - Improved failover/failback with Active PP support - jayaanand already | 14:48 |
| rosmaita | anyway, if you want to dig into some esoteric sqlalchemy usage, you will find https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009029 to be of interest | 14:49 |
| eharney | will take a look there | 14:49 |
| Jyotsna | 3) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1001281 -Improved host proximity for ActivePP support +1 already and requires +2 from core reviewers | 14:49 |
| Jyotsna | can we include them in festival of reviews - Friday meeting | 14:50 |
| simondodsley | Jyotsna: there is no rush now - we are at the start of the Indri cycle - these missed Hibiscus | 14:50 |
| rosmaita | the other item already on today's agenda is "General advice and strategy on deprecating an option" | 14:50 |
| Anoop_Shukla | We have a high priority patch we are looking to get reviewed for ASAr2 support: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/971174 | 14:50 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/973595/ | 14:50 |
| sp-bmilanov | Hey, that's me -- I am not looking for any precise reviews yet, I just want to confirm that is generally the approach to carry on with | 14:51 |
| sp-bmilanov | in order to skip radical refactoring back-and-forth once it has been fleshed out | 14:52 |
| simondodsley | i think this is a good PTG topic | 14:52 |
| Jyotsna | @simondodsley : 1) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1008049 - Skip Online clone synchronous wait for copy... this patch is more interest to customers using concurrent deployment so we need this on priority as soon as indri opens | 14:52 |
| rosmaita | sp-bmilanov: you want to completely remove the option, not rename it or something? | 14:53 |
| sp-bmilanov | simondodsley: hmm.. ok, I will have a look a look how to plug into a PTG slot.. I didn't think it warrants that much attention | 14:53 |
| simondodsley | i think it would be good to have a strategy for futrure reference | 14:53 |
| sp-bmilanov | rosmaita: yes, the option is wrong in general, and there is an added issue that the Cinder scheduler schedules based on that | 14:54 |
| sp-bmilanov | it should have been at least 'storpool:template' | 14:54 |
| Anoop_Shukla | What happens to upgrades when an option is removed? Shouldn’t it be deprecated and users should get time to migrate to an alternative if it exists? | 14:54 |
| sp-bmilanov | if we need to do the offical dance, there would be two phases -- one with the change that handles both in release X | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | right, the usual practice is deprecate in a .1 release, and remove in the next release | 14:55 |
| sp-bmilanov | phase 2 -- remove the option in release Y | 14:55 |
| sp-bmilanov | not actual X and Y, that would be toooooo far in the future :D | 14:55 |
| sp-bmilanov | yeah, what rosmaita said | 14:55 |
| sp-bmilanov | I might also add the related idea of removing pool support from a driver as well | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | well, the slight complication is that with SLURP releases, operators may only upgrade from 2026.1 to 2027.1 | 14:56 |
| Anoop_Shukla | We had a similar option introduced for qos in Manila recently..we took the deprecation path which works. We notified the deprecation and in a future release will remove the older options in support of new.. | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | so a deprecation in a .2 release might not be seen | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | what Anoop_Shukla said ... plus there are some oslo.config features that may help | 14:57 |
| sp-bmilanov | that sounds reasonable.. would it be possible to squeeze all changes in if we migrate our users beforehand? | 14:58 |
| sp-bmilanov | sounds reasonable = I mean introducing the deprecation in a .1 and then removing the option in the next .1 | 14:59 |
| Jyotsna | One more query on openstack-ansible, can anyone confirm if this repo is still actively used and are vendors allowed to push changes ? | 14:59 |
| rosmaita | well, you can remove the option in the next .2 ... you just can't deprecate in .2 | 14:59 |
| sp-bmilanov | huh, that's confusing .. isn't deprecated = pls don't use? and remove = it does not exist | 15:00 |
| sp-bmilanov | how would removal then precede deprecation? | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | yes, but if people are only using .1 releases, they won't see a deprecation notice from .2 | 15:01 |
| simondodsley | Jyotsna: yes - it is still active - i have recently had changes commited there. the process is a little slow as the governance of that project is thin | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | so the idea is all deprecations have to be announced in .1 | 15:01 |
| Jyotsna | <simondodsley> any guidelines to submit patches? also is it supported in RHOSP as well? | 15:02 |
| rosmaita | so, deprecate in 2027.1, remove in 2027.2, and that also removes it from 2028.1 | 15:02 |
| rosmaita | not sure if that made sense -- we can continue to discuss after the meeting | 15:02 |
| sp-bmilanov | ah, right, no, I meant that it sounds reasonable to deprecate in 2027.1 and remove in 2028.1 | 15:02 |
| rosmaita | ok, thanks everyone for attending | 15:03 |
| rosmaita | see you next week at 1400 utc on Tuesday | 15:03 |
| rosmaita | #endmeeting | 15:03 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Oct 7 15:03:19 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:03 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-10-07-14.00.html | 15:03 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-10-07-14.00.txt | 15:03 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-10-07-14.00.log.html | 15:03 |
| simondodsley | Jyotsna: the usual way through gerrit. RHOSP uses tripleo for deployment and is EOL anyway | 15:03 |
| sp-bmilanov | thanks rosmaita, I think I got it | 15:03 |
| sp-bmilanov | Simon! Are you still around? :) | 15:04 |
| sp-bmilanov | I am not sure if you read my messages here from earlier, but I was wondering why you chose Github for the Pure CI logs | 15:05 |
| sp-bmilanov | we have to get the logs out in some way and I was looking for options/opinions | 15:05 |
| sp-bmilanov | (the logs out of the StorPool CI) | 15:06 |
| opendevreview | Eric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Tests: Be more specific about request asserts in Hitachi tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009286 | 15:14 |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder master: [Everpure] Keep volume group QoS and volume QoS apart https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009291 | 15:34 |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder master: [Everpure] Separate volume group and volume QoS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009291 | 15:39 |
| opendevreview | Eric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Bump mypy to 2.4.x https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009308 | 16:34 |
| opendevreview | Pratik Shah proposed openstack/cinder master: [Hitachi] Add volume group replication https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1008534 | 16:42 |
| opendevreview | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/cinder master: [doc-only] Fix typo in release note https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009316 | 17:07 |
| harsh | simondodsley: Hi Simon, if you are around could you please review the comments I resolved for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/982617 | 17:35 |
| harsh | There was a +2 already so hoping to get this merged as we have quite a few dependent patches in a chain :D | 17:36 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/python-cinderclient master: Update jobs according to tested runtimes for 2027.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/1007668 | 17:36 |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder stable/2025.1: Pure Storage: fix revert_to_snapshot argument order https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009334 | 18:08 |
| simondodsley | harsh: done | 18:15 |
| opendevreview | Walt proposed openstack/cinder master: Implement graceful shutdown for Cinder services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/989836 | 18:34 |
| harsh | simondodsley: thank you for the quick review and the +1. I will resolve the nits and publish a new PS in a few minutes. | 18:49 |
| opendevreview | Harsh Ailani proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf Driver] Added support of clone operation for volumegroup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/982617 | 19:44 |
| harsh | simondodsley: it's done :) | 19:46 |
| harsh | agalica: i'm really sorry but you would have to put the +2 again :D | 19:46 |
| opendevreview | Damian Dąbrowski proposed openstack/cinder master: Add backup_default_availability_zone config opt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/978135 | 20:20 |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder master: Everpure: check the resize when cloning to a larger size https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009363 | 20:55 |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder master: Everpure: keep the pod of a managed pod volume in provider_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009364 | 20:55 |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder master: Everpure: use the right type for a failover volume group https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009365 | 20:55 |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder master: Everpure: bound the wait for a ghost pod to stretch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1009366 | 20:55 |
| agalica | harsh: done | 21:35 |
| *** priteau_ is now known as priteau | 21:38 | |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Add spec for FlashArray pods as Cinder pools https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/1009382 | 21:52 |
| opendevreview | Walt proposed openstack/cinder master: Implement graceful shutdown for Cinder services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/989836 | 22:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!