Wednesday, 2026-10-21

opendevreviewMerged openstack/cinder master: Address CVE-2026-93856  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/101148601:17
opendevreviewAbhishek Kekane proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph master: Set RBD EC data pool defaults for services  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/101153303:45
opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/cinder master: Add RBD EC pool functional tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/101159805:04
yessou-sami33Hi everyone, i was trying to see if there is any way to get some traction on these reviews https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/997962 / https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/982617 ? 08:47
yessou-sami33We are also in contact with IBM support and already testing those downstream08:47
opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/cinder master: Add RBD data pool support for RBD drivers  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/91493011:11
opendevreviewAmit Uniyal proposed openstack/cinder master: WIP: Add RBD data pool support to Ceph backups  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/101123411:11
opendevreviewHarsh Ailani proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM SVf] Added FlashCopy 2.0 snapshot support for individual volumes, including create, restore, delete, and clone operations.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/101016112:43
opendevreviewJianwei Guo proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix quota_usages unique constraint conflicts on volume type deletion  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/101165112:59
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin master: Make failing jobs non-voting  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/101152613:39
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin master: Add stable/2026.2 job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/100530813:39
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin master: Remove stable/2025.1 job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/101152813:39
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin master: Stop testing concurrent volume attachments  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/101165713:42
rosmaitaCinder meeting in #openstack-cinder at 1400 UTC14:00
rosmaitajungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney jbernard hemna fabiooliveira yuval tobias-urdin adiare happystacker dosaboy hillpd msaravan sp-bmilanov Luzi sfernand simondodsley  zaubea nileshthathagar flelain wizardbit agalica lutimura kaisers aloke_dev Anoop_Shukla erlon Jyotsna 14:00
erlon\o14:03
whoami-rajatrosmaita, time to start meeting?14:03
simondodsleyo/14:03
Jyotsnao/14:04
fqio/14:05
rakshayo/14:05
rosmaita#startmeeting cinder14:05
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Oct 21 14:05:48 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rosmaita. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:05
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:05
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'cinder'14:05
rosmaita#topic roll call14:06
harsho/14:06
simondodsleyo/14:06
hvlcchao1o/14:06
Jyotsnao/14:06
fqio/14:06
rosmaita#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-indri-meetings14:06
whoami-rajatHi14:06
rosmaitahello!14:06
rosmaitaok, let's get started14:07
rosmaita#topic announcements14:07
rosmaita"Review Requests" etherpad is back by popular demand14:07
rosmaita(as discussed at the PTG)14:07
rosmaita#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-indri-reviews14:07
rosmaitaplease only put reviews on there that have clean CI runs14:08
rosmaitaand it would be helpful to keep your entries updated with whether they have a +2, new revision, etc14:08
rosmaitanext item14:09
rosmaitaEpoxy (stable/2025.1) goes to unmaintained status (as soon as possible, definitely by the end of October)14:09
rosmaita#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/101095314:09
rosmaitayou can see what patches have been proposed but not merged here:14:10
rosmaita#link http://tiny.cc/cinder-maintained14:10
rosmaita(and yes, i need to update that for hibiscus)14:10
rosmaitabut the epoxy stuff is at the bottom14:10
simondodsleyThat URL seems to have an issue for me...14:11
rosmaitasimondodsley: try this then: https://review.opendev.org/dashboard/?title=Cinder+Project+Maintained+Branches&foreach=%28project%3Aopenstack%2Fcinder+OR%0Aproject%3Aopenstack%2Fpython%2Dcinderclient+OR%0Aproject%3Aopenstack%2Fos%2Dbrick+OR%0Aproject%3Aopenstack%2Fcinderlib+OR%0Aproject%3Aopenstack%2Fpython%2Dbrick%2Dcinderclient%2Dext%29%0Astatus%3Aopen+AND+NOT+is%3Awip&2026.1%20(Gazpacho)=branch%3A%5Estable%2F2026.1&202514:12
rosmaitaamingo)=branch%3A%5Estable%2F2025.2&2025.1%20(Epoxy)=branch%3A%5Estable%2F2025.114:12
simondodsleyNo. Says Bad Request. Weird14:12
simondodsleyLooks malformed14:13
rosmaitanot sure what's going on ... anyone else having issues?14:14
simondodsleyAnyway... move on14:14
agalicao/14:14
rosmaitacan someone ack that they can see that dashboard?14:15
auniyal34910no issues, tiny url works for me14:15
*** auniyal34910 is now known as auniyal14:15
harshit works14:15
simondodsleyMust be my app version doing something weird14:15
rosmaitaok, i'll assume it's a simon issue for now, we can troubleshoot after the meeting14:15
Jyotsnahttp://tiny.cc/cinder-maintained gives 400 bad request for me 14:16
rosmaitaok, so key thing is that in order to merge something into Epoxy, it must be merged into all the newer branches, that is, F, G, and H14:16
rosmaitaJyotsna: try the longer one, does that work for you?14:17
simondodsleyAnd that can take forever unless the stable cores are on board....14:17
Jyotsnanope same bad request for long URL as well 14:17
rosmaitaright, so my ask is: if there is a patch listed that you think is important for Epoxy, add it at the top of the reviews etherpad14:18
rosmaitaand check to make sure that it has merged in Flamingo14:18
rosmaitaand if not, put a note on the entry14:18
rosmaitawe will definitely be merging the CVE fix14:18
rosmaitabut other than that, i am kind of agnostic about what gets in14:19
rosmaitaalso, Epoxy will not be deleted yet, but will go to unmaintained14:19
rosmaitaso it's always possible to re-propose a patch if you really want it14:19
rosmaitasimondodsley: Jyotsna: what browser are you using?14:19
Jyotsnaok it works for me in chrome . thanks 14:20
simondodsleyChrome on android at the moment 14:20
rosmaitai just tried firefox, and got a 400 because i was not logged in to gerrit on that browser14:22
rosmaitaapparently requests with regexs are not allowed unless you are logged in14:22
simondodsleyThat's it. Works now14:23
rosmaitacool14:23
rosmaitaok, moving on with announcements14:23
rosmaitanext week's meeting is last of the month, so will be in video14:24
rosmaitaconnection info will be on the agenda14:24
rosmaitaFix for OSSA-2026-045 / CVE-2026-93856 posted yesterday14:24
rosmaita#link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22cve-2026-93856%2214:24
rosmaitathanks to Rajat for writing the patch14:25
rosmaitait is slowly making its way through the gates14:25
rosmaitanext: Milestone-1 is the week of November 1614:26
rosmaitathere are several deadlines for that week14:26
rosmaitaspec freeze14:26
rosmaitaalso, the priority features as discussed at the PTG14:27
rosmaita1. NVMe-FC support in os-brick (listed on review requests etherpad); will do an os-brick release as soon as that merges14:27
rosmaita2. image_utils changed to use oslo format inspector instead of the current cinder-local code14:27
rosmaita3. phase 1 of the image encryption effort (with front-end encryption for NFS blocked)14:28
simondodsleyAnd CBT please14:28
rosmaitawell, the CBT spec still needs to merge14:28
rosmaitaso the spec is definitely a priority for M-114:29
simondodsleyI was talking about the spec, re spec freeze14:29
rosmaitaoh, ok14:29
rosmaitai will be sending out a ptg summary with some details later today14:29
rosmaitafinal announcement is, in case you missed it at the ptg, we have several deadlines throughout the cycle:14:31
rosmaita#link https://28e7b7c9c24f45667858-8c8e1caf92c572d2c7c7d35e44c895e7.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/openstack/3fd59d29b7bc4455b4e96e86a0fe68cd/docs/indri/schedule.html14:31
rosmaita(the patch hasn't merged onto the "real" release schedule yet)14:31
rosmaitabut please look the schedule over and note anything that affects you14:31
rosmaitain particular, the midcycle meetings14:32
rosmaitaand everything else, there is no filler14:32
rosmaita#topic Topics14:33
rosmaita#topic fixing uncrypted -> encrypted volume retype14:33
rosmaitajanwasilewski: that's you14:33
rosmaita#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/101023014:34
rosmaitato answer your questions on the agenda:14:34
rosmaitayes, we will need a spec (because you are introducing a new microversion)14:35
rosmaitaand we can discuss the rest on the spec14:36
rosmaitai was looking for a good link to where we talk about specs in the docs14:39
rosmaitabest i could find is14:39
rosmaita#link https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/contributor/contributing.html#new-feature-planning14:39
fqiWe also have a spec retype volume including snapshots. Could you please set the target for this to Indir?14:40
rosmaitaif anyone knows of something better, please let me know, or put up a docs patch to add the link to ^^14:40
rosmaita#topic InfoScale new driver patch14:41
simondodsleyThere are a lot of specs out there for Indri and many are asking for a new microversion14:41
rosmaitaabout infoscale ... i think we should make an effort to get the os-brick change and the new driver merged for M-114:42
aloke_devHi All,  The Ci is enabled for this InfoScale driver addition. It has dependency on os-brick. So, wanted to get your guidance on how to proceed further so we can have this driver in the upcoming release. 14:43
simondodsleyWhat is the patch series for that and I'll take a look14:43
rosmaitait looks like reviewers didn't have any major issues with the driver, so we can go ahead and get reviewing on the os-brick change14:43
rosmaita#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/98607014:43
aloke_devrosmaita: That will surely help!14:44
rosmaitaaloke_dev: is the infoscale third party CI running?14:45
simondodsleyI don't see it reporting on the os-brick patch.14:45
rosmaitaok, found it responding on May 24 on the driver patch, patch set 714:45
aloke_devYes, it is. It posted the CI status on the Cinder PR when we enabled it few months back. I will check if there is any issue with that. AFAIK, it should be up and running. 14:46
simondodsleyAll vendor CIs must also check os-brick14:46
rosmaitai guess the driver CI job is consuming os-brick from source (or else it couldn't be using the connector)?14:47
aloke_devsimondodsley: I think the CI is not listening on the os-brick tree. I will enable it. It is triggered for the cinder source tree only. Thank you!14:47
simondodsleyThanks14:48
rosmaitaaloke_dev: simondodsley is correct, you want it running on os-brick also because once your changes merge, people may begin to "fix" stuff, and you want to catch regressions right away14:48
rosmaitabut since the third-party jobs are non-voting, you must keep an eye on them yourself so you can -1 an os-brick patch that breaks your driver14:49
rosmaitasame thing with your cinder driver CI14:49
aloke_devSure, rosmaita!  regarding the Cinder CI, it is consuming the os-brick from a private source tree having for the connector APIs. 14:51
aloke_devI will enable our CI for the os-brick as well. 14:51
rosmaitaaloke_dev: ok, thanks ... that's good, so we know the os-brick patch is working14:51
rosmaitayou'll want to switch over to actual os-brick once your change merges14:52
simondodsleyYou should consume os-brick from the master branch in github in my opinion 14:52
aloke_devyes, That is what we have planned. 14:52
rosmaitasounds good!14:52
simondodsleyI assume the driver patch has the os-brick patch as a dependency 14:53
rosmaitaso reviewers, please look at the os-brick patch14:53
rosmaita#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/98607014:53
rosmaita#topic open discussion14:53
rosmaitaanyone from netapp here?14:53
aloke_devsimondodsley: yes it has the dependency on the os-brick.14:53
rosmaitawas it the netapp team that is having issues with IRC being blocked in their workplace?14:54
simondodsleyI think that was Dell14:54
rosmaitai wonder if the oftc web interface would be a way around that14:54
fqiWe also have a spec retype volume including snapshots. It already got +2 code review. Could you please set the target for this to Indir?14:54
Jyotsna(Jyotsna) HPE Alletra MP driver:  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1008049 : Skip sync wait for same-size clones - (only one +2 pending) can we please have another +2 and target merge 14:55
rosmaitafqi: yes, that should be a priority spec review14:55
rakshay@rosmaita can we please have some traction on this bug fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/997962. CU is waiting for this fix as it is affecting their prod. 14:55
fqiThank you. I will update it.14:56
rosmaitarakshay: looks like a relatively small patch, and the third party CI is running14:57
Jyotsna  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/1008049  patch had just code removal to bring it to parity with old driver, we somehow missed it in new driver merge, so request reviewers attention for +214:57
rosmaitaok, let's try to get some eyes on rakshay and Jyotsna patches this week14:59
rosmaitafinal item has to do with broken cinder-tempest-plugin jobs14:59
Jyotsna<rosmaita> when is the next review meeting planned ? we want to participate in it14:59
tkajinamI think https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/1011526 contains information and links to understand the situation14:59
rosmaitaJyotsna: first and third Friday each month at 1400 utc15:00
* tkajinam was wondering if I can cover the topic I added to the etherpad first if these are not something I've missed there ?15:00
rosmaitatkajinam: thank you15:00
Jyotsnaok so next meeting is on 6th Nov 15:00
rosmaitatkajinam: yes, please update15:00
tkajinamanyway15:00
rosmaitatkajinam: i will look at those today, so if there's anything you forgot, please add it15:01
tkajinamI left these note just in case people are wondering why CI doesn't pass cinder-tempest-plugin. please check 1011526 before you do recheck15:01
rosmaitai will work from the list in the agenda15:01
tkajinama bit tricky problem is https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder-tempest-plugin/+bug/2171624 I found today15:02
rosmaitaeveryone -- please note -- no blind rechecks of cinder-tempest-plugin test failures15:02
tkajinambasically the behavior being tested in a test case is no longer supported by nova. I had a chat with sean about that and we agreed this has been working but hasn't been intended to be supported really15:02
tkajinamthe change I proposed drops that broken test, but would appreciate any feedback from cinder team, too.15:03
tkajinam1011657 is the change I'm talking about15:03
rosmaita#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/101165715:03
tkajinamthat's an additional context. let me know if you find any questions15:03
rosmaitaok, thanks tkajinam15:04
tkajinamwe need to drop 2025.1 job from CI soon so we may need to unblock CI there before that15:04
tkajinamthat's all15:04
tkajinamrosmaita, thanks !15:04
rosmaitawe are out of time, thanks everyone for attending15:04
rosmaita#endmeeting15:04
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Oct 21 15:04:34 2026 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:04
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-10-21-14.05.html15:04
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-10-21-14.05.txt15:04
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2026/cinder.2026-10-21-14.05.log.html15:04
tkajinamaloke_dev, just fyi. if you follow the common pattern in "native" jobs, you consume released artifact of os-brick in in cinder jobs while you consume latest os-brick source in os-brick jobs, but you can consume source in both jobs for your third party CI. .15:06
*** auniyal1 is now known as auniyal15:13
opendevreviewMerged openstack/cinder stable/2026.2: Address CVE-2026-93856  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/101148716:30
*** raineszm0 is now known as raineszm16:55
opendevreviewMerged openstack/cinder stable/2026.1: Address CVE-2026-93856  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/101148818:40
opendevreviewMerged openstack/cinder stable/2025.2: Address CVE-2026-93856  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/101148921:38
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: api: add microversion for snapshot-aware retype  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99490222:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: policy: add rule for snapshot-aware retype  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99490322:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: api: add max_snapshots_per_migration config option  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99490422:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: volume: preflight snapshot-aware retype  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99490522:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: volume: block snapshot ops during retype  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99490622:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: volume: route snapshot retype to generic migration  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99490722:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: volume: add migrated snapshot update plumbing  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99490822:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: volume: rebuild one snapshot into a staging destination snapshot  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99490922:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: volume: add driver hook for snapshot retype data copy  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99491022:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: volume: refactor migrate_volume driver path  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99491122:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: volume: orchestrate generic snapshot retype  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99491222:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: scheduler: require snapshot migration capable retype backends  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99491322:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder master: lvm: support migrated snapshot rename  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/99491422:07
opendevreviewFuli Qi proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Add spec for retype volume including snapshots  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/98932222:46

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!