Monday, 2025-08-25

noonedeadpunkhey folks! Can I ask for some attention on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/922109  ?16:47
noonedeadpunkas it's around for over a year and it already makes limited snese16:47
noonedeadpunkI'd love to push changes for 42 already, but if they have no prespecitve to be merged - potentially I should just keep maintiaing fedora element downstream?16:48
clarkb(I noted that those of us who maintain dib as part of openstac infra/opendev don't really have the resources to support fedora. Not sure if the ironic folks that dabble in dib are interested in keeping fedora afloat)16:49
noonedeadpunkI'm fine with helping with it's maintenance16:50
noonedeadpunkwe do use dib for produicing openstack images for tenants, so we'd need to maintain that either upstream or downstream16:50
clarkbthen also centos 9 stream testing is still broken because centos 9 stream published bad images16:51
JayFI don't have enough knowledge about fedora to feel like a "maintainer"16:51
clarkbI know there is a bug for that in centos' tracker but it seems to have happened multiple times and hasn't been corrected so not sure if we need to push harder for a resoltuon there or consider dropping centos 9 stream testing with upstream images (the -minimal maintained images can continue to cover that platform)16:51
JayFbut I'm willing to review changes for reasonableness/safety and +2 them if we have a consensus that's okay16:51
clarkbs/-minimal maintained/-minimal based/16:51
JayFmy thought on stuff like that is as long as we're sure it's not dangerous, arguably mostly-working fedora support (Assuming review misses some thing) is better than no support at all as long as folks are responsive to bugs16:52
JayFand I think that's what noonedeadpunk is volunteering to do16:52
noonedeadpunkAlso given that CI is passing - this should lower risk... hopefully16:53
noonedeadpunkbut yes16:53
noonedeadpunkI'd rather do this as upstream best effort16:53
clarkbnoonedeadpunk: I posted some general testing remarks that will need an update16:59
clarkbgiven this is only modifying the upstream image locations (I guess they added -Generic then switched the order of arch vs release in the filename?) I'm probably ok approve that myself16:59
clarkbI was worred it was going to require a bunch of networking updates and so on which is pretty typical of fedora updates17:00
noonedeadpunkyeah, they've messed up with naming conventions quite a bit17:00
noonedeadpunkI'm obviously having some downstream version of the element right now, and images seems to be working17:00
noonedeadpunkbut yeah... your comments are absolutely valid17:01
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/diskimage-builder master: Add support for building Fedora 40  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/92210917:06
clarkbI'll rereview it right now so I don't forget (I expect ci to fail fwiw but thats ok we can approve once ci is happy17:06
clarkbnoonedeadpunk: were you going to update the tools/ test job check script thing too?17:07
noonedeadpunkso far I'm not sure what exactly needs to be changed there17:08
noonedeadpunkas it looks kinda generic so far17:09
clarkbnoonedeadpunk: https://review.opendev.org/c/zuul/nodepool/+/946136/2/tools/functional-test-check.sh17:09
clarkbyou made that change in nodepool to fix things then linked to it in the zuul config indicating that is why the job is non voting17:10
noonedeadpunkoh well17:10
clarkbI'm saying you can put that in dib itself then we don't need to make the job non voting.17:10
noonedeadpunkI forgot about that :D17:10
clarkb(because dib no longer uses nodepool for its ci)17:10
noonedeadpunkright17:10
noonedeadpunkthanks for pointing this out17:11
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/diskimage-builder master: Add support for building Fedora 40  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/92210917:12

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!