Monday, 2018-01-15

-openstackstatus- NOTICE: The logs.openstack.org filesystem has been restored to full health. We are attempting to keep logs uploaded between the prior alert and this one, however if your job logs are missing please issue a recheck.04:47
*** ChanServ changes topic to "The logs.openstack.org filesystem has been restored to full health. We are attempting to keep logs uploaded between the prior alert and this one, however if your job logs are missing please issue a recheck."04:47
*** ChanServ changes topic to "First official meeting is 1/15 at 19:00 UTC - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda"04:52
*** janki has joined #openstack-diversity04:59
*** janki is now known as janki|afk06:10
*** janki|afk has quit IRC06:10
*** janki has joined #openstack-diversity06:11
*** janki is now known as janki|afk06:12
*** janki|afk is now known as janki07:46
*** cdent has joined #openstack-diversity10:47
*** cdent has quit IRC11:10
*** cdent has joined #openstack-diversity11:11
*** cdent has quit IRC11:16
*** cdent has joined #openstack-diversity11:17
*** janki has quit IRC13:31
*** janki has joined #openstack-diversity13:32
*** cdent has quit IRC14:28
*** cdent has joined #openstack-diversity15:05
*** janki has quit IRC17:17
spotzamrith aprice cdent cmurphy eglute fungi ildikov jhebden lsell__ mkrai mrhillsman wendar - Meeting in 90 minutes agenda link is  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda17:32
cdentthanks for the reminder spotz17:33
cdenttotally would have spaced it otherwise17:33
spotzcdent: No woorries, I know we might have reduced attendance just didn't want to skip another week17:33
cdent(and still may not be able to make it :( )17:33
spotzcdent: Main thing is if you have comments on the older survey wording feel free to comment on the etherpad with them. The sooner we can get a revised survey out the better17:34
* cdent nods17:35
fungispotz: did you see my reply on the ml regarding what "odd weeks" means from an openstack scheduling perspective?17:37
spotzfungi: Yeah I figured we'd discuss whether we want set weeks or rotating other weeks tooday which should address that17:38
fungijust didn't want there to be confusion17:38
spotzfungi: Yeah and we'll probably need to adjust the WoO meeting entry too:)17:39
fungi(specifically, confusion as to what dates the calendar on eavesdrop.o.o will claim are meeting days)17:39
fungiworst case, you use a "weekly" entry and then just skip off-weeks17:39
spotzfungi: Has the move to project channels helped with that?17:40
fungino clue. most of the meetings i attend still use the central meeting channels rather than hosting them in their project-specific channels17:40
spotzfungi: Ahh, yeah I'm still on the channels and see them active, all mine are in normal channels though except for OUI17:41
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Zuul has been restarted and has lost queue contents; changes in progress will need to be rechecked.18:22
cdentIs it 90 minutes from 90 minutes ago?18:58
ildikovspotz: fungi: I like better the every second week rather than 1st and 3rd day of a month as I always lose track...18:58
ildikovcdent: yes :)18:58
spotzildikov: yeah me too kinda:)18:58
spotzcdent - according to my reminder alarm you have 2 minutes:)18:59
cdentI can only know what it is if I know what it was last week18:59
fungiildikov: by "every second week" you mean alternating weeks? that's my preference mainly just because we have a scheduling tool which supports that method18:59
fungiwhile we don't have a good solution at the moment for scheduling a meeting on "the first and third monday of each month"18:59
spotzOk it sounds kinda unanimouos, just let me know how to fix the entry and I'll re-patch19:00
fungibut we shouldn't be a slave to our tools either, if there's a good reason to add support for the latter19:00
fungispotz: it's what your entry already has19:00
fungiso shouldn't need fixing19:00
spotzfungi: Sweet, so I just need to remail the list:)19:00
ildikovfungi: yes, alternating what I meant19:01
cmurphyo/19:01
fungiyeah, my correction when replying was that you mad mischaracterized what your patch actually did19:01
fungis/mad/had/19:01
spotzAnd let's get this party started19:01
spotzNo mad is probably accurate:)19:01
fungi;)19:01
spotz#startmeeting diversity-wg19:01
openstackMeeting started Mon Jan 15 19:01:40 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is spotz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: diversity-wg)"19:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'diversity_wg'19:01
spotz+topic Roll Call19:01
cdento/19:02
ildikovo/19:02
spotz#topic Roll Call19:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: diversity-wg)"19:02
spotzAnd just for reference19:02
spotz#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda19:02
spotzSo looks like with the holiday we'll be a small group. I think everyone who's here except maybe fungi has seen oouor first topic19:04
spotz#topic Mozilla Open Source Survey19:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Mozilla Open Source Survey (Meeting topic: diversity-wg)"19:04
spotz#link https://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/4077523/Diversity-Inclusion-in-Open-Source19:04
spotzI think that link will work for everyone, but the main thing I'd like us too look at is how soome of the questions are worded and the breakdowns they used especially gender19:05
cdentthey did a really good job in that of never making me feel bad for not liking any of the options19:05
ildikov:)19:06
spotzYeah and at the same time you weren't always choosing other and having to fill it in19:06
cdentyup19:06
ildikovI wonder how much typing we feel efficient for surveys19:07
ildikovotherwise I agree to the above19:07
spotzWhen we did the first survey I was hoping for something similar but we ended up with M/F/and I think other. That's something I'd like us to improve on this go around as it will ultimately give us better data to compare19:07
apriceo/19:08
apriceSorry I'm late19:08
cdentyeah, m/f/other is not going to inspire confidence in the rest of the survey19:08
spotzildikov: I think we should always provide the opportunity for someone to give their opinion, but where possible have enough entries they can find their response so we don't have to go back and try to see if person A is really saying the same thing as person C19:08
spotzHey aprice:)19:09
apriceHello :)19:09
ildikovspotz: +1, my thought too19:09
ildikovspotz: also I think we get more people fill out the whole form if they don't necessarily have to type that much overall19:09
cdentyes, click instead of type good19:10
spotzildikov: yeah and if you only type where you want to say something the typing will have more value19:10
ildikovspotz: +119:10
spotzSo main reason for starting with the Mozilla survey is to bring it to everyone's attention and to get an idea of how we might change some of our questions especially gender. I'm not sure how we broke up age groups or if we necessarily want to renumber, unless it's in such a way we can still compare19:12
spotzUnfortunately the draft version of the first survey didn't have all the drop downs actually there19:13
spotzI can pull up the link if anyone wants to see the google doc, though the actual questions are on the etherpad.19:14
spotz#topic Revisions of original survey19:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Revisions of original survey (Meeting topic: diversity-wg)"19:14
spotz#link  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-survey-spring-201819:14
cmurphythose are the questions on the original survey?19:14
spotzSo as far as I know these are the final questions, aprice if they're not can you up date the ether from what you found in surveymonkey?19:15
apriceYep - I can take that action item19:15
spotzcmurphy: To the best of my knowledge. After our kickoff I sent the list an email with as much digging through the older material as I could19:15
spotz@action aprice - update the etherpad with any missing/wrong questions from the original survey19:16
spotz#action aprice - update the etherpad with any missing/wrong questions from the original survey19:16
spotzI can type I swear!19:16
aprice:)19:17
spotzSo just working through what we do have. Do we still want to find out country of birth as well as country of current residence?19:17
spotzMain reason for this was that we were gooiong to ask if they fely like a minority I believe ooriginally19:18
spotzYeah and my o is borked, I'll fix before i hit enter when I catch it:)19:18
apriceI think that current residence is more actionable and we should try to keep the survey as short as possible19:20
spotzI actually do like these questions (they'll have a drop down of all the countries) as I think it gives us some insight into relocations. If we thought it useful could follow up with did you move for work/personal/school19:20
cmurphydo any of us in this group have a background in sociology or similar? I know survey crafting is touchy and it'd be nice to have professional eyes on it19:21
spotzaprice unless there's more in survey monkey we're sitting at 14 with the what else question at the end so not too bad if we want to add19:21
spotzcmurphy: I did a survey foor my thesis about water quality and perceptions:) But that's also why I like adapting the Mozilla stuff where we can19:22
cmurphyspotz: awesome19:22
fungido we know whether mofo engages sociologists and research scientists on their survey?19:22
fungior whether they're just "winging it?"19:22
spotzwe could also hit up Daniel from Bitergia and folks from CHAOSS as we'd like oour stuff to be integrated19:23
spotzfungi I can check with Emma19:23
spotzi actually invited her to join us as she's on the woO list19:23
fungicool, i'd be wary of cargo-culting surveys based on the incorrect assumption that we're copying from someone who actually did what we're afraid we don't19:25
spotzfungi: I think that's also part of the driving force behind CHAOSS, to have goood questions that can be used between different communities and provide comparable data19:26
ildikovyeah19:27
fungigreat19:27
ildikovand also really just the process to give a starting point to communities who would like to do surveys like this19:27
spotzSo even if 75% of the questions become baselines and 25% is OpenStack specific I think we are doing the right thing for us as well as Open Source as a whole19:28
ildikovsounds good to me :)19:29
spotzSo I've marked the first one (Couontry of birth) as maybe removoe for length, the second (reside) as a keeper. And if no one objects I'd like to mark the gender one as adapt from mozilla. Any objections?19:29
cmurphy+1 to the gender question from moz19:29
spotzI think with the mozilla oone we can combine questions 2 and 319:30
spotzerr 3 and 4, sexuality and gender19:31
cdentno objections19:31
fungiyeah, about halfway through the mofo survey now, and agree the gender question was... lots of options. i couldn't think if any obvious omissions (plus there's always the write-in field)19:32
spotzSo the next question is religious identity, I think this ties back to questions 1 and 2 to perhaps determine if someone might feel they were a minority based on religion19:33
spotzfungi yeah I think someone would be hard-pressed to not find themselves there19:33
spotzSo do we feel this is still something valid to ask?19:34
fungiwe did have a lengthy debate back when the original survey was done, suggesting that asking for religious or political identities was overreaching and unlikely to represent a significant insight19:35
spotzAnd I realize we may need to table answering that as maybe 3-4 religions might be present19:35
spotzfungi: Yeah and we did ditch the political one, I mean what one party is called in one country could be totally different in another19:36
fungii'm curious, did we get any useful insights out of the religion question last time?19:36
spotzalso if aprice finds it wasn't on the final survey monkey we can rip it out19:36
ildikovI'm a maybe with the religion, but no on the political one19:37
spotzI could have sworn I emailed out a link to a presentation done in Tokyo, give me 2 more minutes to see if I can find it quickly19:39
apriceWith religion, I think it's helpful because religious holidays can affect participation.19:40
cmurphyi would think that religious expression could play a part in someone's comfort level in attending in-person events, e.g. comfort with traveling to certain countries or food options at events19:40
cmurphyaprice: ++19:40
ildikovaprice: is that significant?19:41
apriceI think so19:41
apriceBecause we want to make sure OpenStack events are as inclusive as possible19:41
apriceSo we need to identify the religious holidays that may not be on our radar19:42
ildikovok, from events perspective it makes sense19:42
ildikovhowever as the venue availability decides dates many times as well19:43
spotzOk so religion stays in, we will put together a list of possibles to include and most likely an other unless we can find an all inclusive list like the Mozilla gender list19:43
spotzAnd slide deck froom Tokyo19:43
fungishould we instead ask whether contributors find that observance of their religious or national holidays hamper full participation in the community?19:43
spotz#link https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1pB-2YZDVyPDwSOgO7ASe6M8o3DOXyDHO4R5Jv9h7n34/edit?usp=sharing19:43
spotzfungi I think that would be a good way of wording it, maybe follow up with a blank or an optional drop doown to choose from?19:44
ildikovfungi: +119:44
spotzOnly problem with optional questions is sometimes youo still have to fill them oout19:45
apricefungi +119:45
cdentif we ask that question, and they say "yes" but we haven't asked them their religion, we can't do anything with the answer19:45
cdentI think the idea here it gather enough information to pre-emptively try to do the right thing?19:45
cdents/it/is to/19:46
spotzcdent which is my suggestion of using a folloow up19:46
spotzIf it's not an issue move on, if it is we'd like to know what religion19:46
fungicdent: to the contrary, even if we know their religion or nationality we don't know which specific holidays are creating the challenge19:46
fungibut yes, don't need to hash that out now19:46
cdentthat presumes that that one issue is the holidays19:46
cdentwe can't guess what matters, indeed the entire point of being inclusive is that we don't know, now19:47
cdentbut with information we are more empowered19:47
spotzWe've got 13 minutes left we can stay oon this for another 10, and then I'd just like to talk vancouver planning and PTG but I may not be there so will need someone to lead19:47
cdentI agree, however, that asking these questions can seem intrusive, so it is a balance19:47
ildikovI think we can always do follow-up surveys, so I wouldn't shoot for all the info at once19:48
spotzactually looking at fungi's we should break out national holidays possibly?19:48
spotzildikov: That was the original plan as well as a resend to get more responses but neither happened19:49
ildikovlike if many people feel that we're organizing events when they cannot participate we can dig deeper next time19:49
ildikovmaking everyone happy is the unreachable target19:49
spotzheheh19:49
cmurphyI think a y/n "does your religion affect your participation" + blank space to describe is the best way, as cdent said we can't really anticipate right now how to break it down specifically19:50
spotzDo you find that observance of their religious or national holidays hamper full participation in the community? -19:50
spotzOk notes made on fingi's re-write are19:50
fungii like cmurphy's idea19:50
spotzpoossibly break into 2, also possible followup of what religion19:51
fungiit avoids the tricky business of asking people what their religion is19:51
ildikovI think "does your religion affect your participation" can easily be misunderstood19:51
spotzOk so follow up with a blank space for please explain?19:51
ildikovor to phrase it another way I don't interpret it in a way as we talked about it above19:52
fungi"do you feel that your religion presents challenges for participation in the project?"19:52
fungiis that less easily misunderstood?19:52
spotzfungi: project or in OpenStack?19:52
ildikovI think we could add examples like how the Mozilla survey does19:52
fungiif we're only asking them about openstack, then in openstack is probably fine19:52
ildikovlike holidays always overlap with conferences, or smth like19:53
fungiworth noting though that the mofo survey doesn't focus on their projects19:53
spotzildikov: So unable to attend for religiouos oobeservance, unable to participate due to?19:53
spotzfungi: And neither really did we first time around, it was pretty broad19:53
ildikovspotz: it's better19:54
fungialso remember that we're headed down the path of the openstack foundation sponsoring multiple communities besides openstack itself, so could have a bit of an identity crisis for these sorts of efforts needing to decide whether they're openstack-specific19:54
spotzfungi: Well we could just say in the community? Then we couold re-use for openStack, kata, etc?19:55
spotzor we start off also with what communities under the fooundation do you participate in?19:55
fungivery good questions ;)19:56
spotzOk I'll copy and paste those 2 comments on the end of the etherpad. I'd like to then move on to just a quick ptg/summit discussion19:56
spotz#topic summit/ptg19:57
*** openstack changes topic to "summit/ptg (Meeting topic: diversity-wg)"19:57
spotzSo I may or may not make it to PTG, does the group want me to try to get us some space? I could always dial in19:58
spotzI do think even though the group is so new it would provide some benefit even if everyone just met for lunch19:58
fungii'm happy to pitch in on discussions at the ptg if available, but also expect to be stretched thin so can't make any guarantees19:59
cdentditto19:59
cmurphyI would +1 meeting for lunch, -0.5 on reserving space unless we have a set of goals we want to accomplish19:59
cmurphyditto to being stretched19:59
spotzOk so lunch/dinner meeting if possible20:00
fungii will make participating in diversity discussions high priority at least, and lunch or dinner seems most likely to pan out for me20:01
ildikov+120:01
ildikovI vote for lunch :)20:01
spotzOk Vancouover - we should definitely put in for a WG space when those open up. I am thinking about putting in a talk, hopefully to go over the survey responses but if not the survey itself and what we're hoping to gain. If anyone else would like to jooin on that let me knowo20:02
spotzAnd if someone know how to fix my o without going to the Apple store... :)20:02
cdentspotz: is it a new macbook pro? my keys are starting go after only 8 months20:03
spotzIs there anything else we should shoot for in Vancouver?20:03
spotzcdent yep, had an issue with 7 that fixed itself noow it's o20:04
fungilikely they need to pop in a new keyboard :(20:04
cdentfeels like dirt20:04
spotzfungi: Yeah so Apple store time.20:04
fungi(for my older netbooks, i bought up a stack of replacement keyboards so i could replace them myself when the membranes started to wear thin)20:05
spotzOk closing this oone down as it's time for Upstream Inst meeting. If anyone has any other thoughts for Vancouver or wants in on the proposal let me knoow. See everyone in 2 weeks!20:05
spotz#endmeeting20:05
*** openstack changes topic to "First official meeting is 1/15 at 19:00 UTC - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/diversity-wg-agenda"20:05
openstackMeeting ended Mon Jan 15 20:05:38 2018 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:05
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/diversity_wg/2018/diversity_wg.2018-01-15-19.01.html20:05
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/diversity_wg/2018/diversity_wg.2018-01-15-19.01.txt20:05
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/diversity_wg/2018/diversity_wg.2018-01-15-19.01.log.html20:05
spotzI'm still about though:)20:06
cmurphythanks spotz20:06
spotzthanks everyone for coming:)20:06
cdentthanks!20:07
*** cdent has quit IRC23:17

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!