| gouthamr | i was TC liaison, but, didn't have +2 rights.. ianychoi and slaweq just politely considered by +1s as +2s :D | 17:22 |
|---|---|---|
| gouthamr | but, i like the idea of extending the +2 rights to a tc-liaison | 17:23 |
| gouthamr | maybe we'll need a new group and add/remove members from it? | 17:23 |
| gouthamr | you can let tech-committee-chair toggle perms on the group, wdyt? | 17:23 |
| fungi | gouthamr: https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/election-core is owned by the tech-committee group already, so members of the tc can already (and must) add/remove maintainer access to the repo anyway | 17:58 |
| gouthamr | ah! true | 17:58 |
| gouthamr | nice, but do you think we need the liaison on election-core? | 17:58 |
| fungi | i would just put the tc's election liaison there and be done with it | 17:58 |
| gouthamr | okay, fair.. | 17:59 |
| fungi | if the goal is to give them code review access | 17:59 |
| fungi | er, change approval access i mean | 17:59 |
| fungi | toggling some other group for that would be at least the same amount of work plus additional compelxity | 17:59 |
| gouthamr | yeah | 17:59 |
| gouthamr | agreed, _we_ can tell the election officials and liaison/s apart :P | 18:00 |
| fungi | and the place for everyone else to find out who election officials are is https://governance.openstack.org/election/#election-officials | 18:00 |
| fungi | the election-core group in gerrit is an implementation detail, not documentation | 18:01 |
| ianychoi | I am fine for tc liaison to be added to the gerrit group and also fine with adding new TC liaison to the gerrit group once tc liaison part on ^ doc is updated | 18:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!