| opendevreview | Wu Wenxiang proposed openstack/election master: Adding Wu Wenxiang candidacy for Skyline 2027.1 PTL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001530 | 01:45 |
|---|---|---|
| fungi | so no ptl runoff polls this time, but we do have one for tc (5 candidates competing over 4 seats)? | 13:10 |
| fungi | and while i haven't checked for sure, it looks like we aren't at risk of exceeding the tc's affiliation limit regardless of how the vote goes | 13:13 |
| fungi | yeah, confirmed there's no chance to exceed it no matter how the vote goes | 14:12 |
| fungi | i recommend prioritizing review of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001560 and its remaining unmerged parents, so that you're not stuck applying that locally in order to generate the electorate | 14:14 |
| fungi | also a tip: you'll be able to identify the new core-reviewer-only/non-change-owner contributors because they'll have 0 count/revisions recorded in `_all_owners.yaml` (as opposed to extra-ac who have -1 count/revisions) | 14:19 |
| gouthamr | nice | 16:39 |
| gouthamr | ianychoi: slaweq: last cycle, we had a PTL election, and no TC election.. you posted the TC results after the nomination period: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/978082 | 16:42 |
| gouthamr | likewise, don't we want to post the PTL results right now? | 16:42 |
| ianychoi | gouthamr: For PTL results, yes once some concerns on the comments for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001265 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001530 are fully addressed. | 16:55 |
| ianychoi | For Masakari, no extra AC propose happened. For Skyline, OIF membership was validated after election nomination period, while technically, there is a contradictory situation: PTL nomination is not validated due to non-OIF membership during the timeframe vs. the electorate would vote for TC since technically it is time to check OIF membership now. Any further thoughts slaweq ? | 16:59 |
| ianychoi | Also, once https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001560 is merged, the electorate of Masakari can vote for TC I suspect | 17:02 |
| ianychoi | I meant, the criteria for candidacy and voting needs to be consistent, while this election is not easy due to above contradictory situation.. that has come up to me. | 17:04 |
| fungi | in cases where there is one ptl nominee who didn't qualify due to a technicality (e.g. missing foundation membership added after the deadline), the tc can appoint them to the role easily once the election has concluded | 17:05 |
| ianychoi | Thank you - if there are no more strong opinion, then I will comment based on above situation and will prioritize to see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001560 tmr | 17:23 |
| fungi | think of it like the reason we have dedicated election officials is so that the majority of ptls are determined via established process, so that the tc only has to worry about appointing a few exceptional outliers rather than all of them | 17:27 |
| gouthamr | +2 | 18:42 |
| gouthamr | yeah, let us handle https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001265 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001530 | 18:42 |
| gouthamr | it's good for us to popularize what needs to be done | 18:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!