| slaweq | ianychoi: fungi hi, sorry, I missed discussion about rolls SHAs earlier this week. I am checking it right now. But I wonder about patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001560 - should we merge it now and then generate rolls with that patch or wait with it until end of the current election? | 08:41 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Add internal toggle to skip change incrementing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001555 | 08:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Pass details explicitly to record_contributor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001565 | 08:48 |
| slaweq | ianychoi: I've just confirmed SHA's for both with and without 1001560 change | 09:10 |
| fungi | slaweq: my understanding is the reason the tc rushed to pass that resolution was so that the additional contributors would be included in this election | 13:12 |
| fungi | which is also why i scrambled to have the patches up for review by the end of the nomination window (in case it was needed for qualifying any ptl nominees as candidates, though conveniently turned out not to be) | 13:14 |
| slaweq | fungi: ok, so I just approved it | 13:33 |
| slaweq | ianychoi: please make sure to prepare tc election poll using that rolls generated with this patch included | 13:33 |
| fungi | as discussed, the additional rule picked up 10 additional active contributors. if you compare the outputs you'll see the first/last dates and change ids for some other contributors expanded too if they're core reviewers who were casting votes on changes before their first or after their last owned change merged too | 13:39 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/election master: Active core reviewers are also Active Contributors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1001560 | 13:40 |
| ianychoi | fungi: I and slaweq double-checked SHA for _electorate.txt file with 258 lines which contain the list of e-mail addresses. Anything else you wanna suggest election officials to verify? And according to https://opendev.org/openstack/election/src/branch/master/README.rst#tc-election-round election officials need to upload rolls once election starts, while I think uploading now should be fine for smooth election process. | 14:21 |
| ianychoi | slaweq: No worries - I sent an e-mail which includes CIVS url to start & stop the poll yesterday, which only election officials keep | 14:23 |
| ianychoi | (Ah, and fungi also helped to double-check SHA - thank you!) | 14:24 |
| fungi | ianychoi: not really, i guess the other hint for evaluating who the new additions to the rolls are from the recent core reviewer tc resolution is that you can identify them easily in the _all_owners.yaml file because they'll be the only entries with a change count of 0 (extra acs have a count of -1 and normal code contributors have a positive count) | 14:26 |
| slaweq | ianychoi: yeah, I have email, thx | 15:07 |
| slaweq | will you be able to start poll tomorrow morning your time or do you want me to do it? | 15:08 |
| ianychoi | slaweq: Up to your preference :) | 15:10 |
| slaweq | for me it will be around 1:45 in the night so I definitely prefer you to do it :) | 15:11 |
| ianychoi | Got it :) | 15:11 |
| slaweq | thx a lot | 15:11 |
| slaweq | see you | 15:11 |
| ianychoi | Thank you too! | 15:11 |
| fungi | note that it's okay to open the polls earlier in the day if it's convenient for officials, and close them later. the schedule is supposed to indicate a minimum window for when votes can be cast but it's fine to accept them earlier than the scheduled start/after the scheduled end | 15:13 |
| fungi | we tried to make the process flexible to accomodate officials in any time zone | 15:14 |
| fungi | that's also why i always advocated for some cushion between phases in the timeline where election official actions are necessary | 15:15 |
| fungi | i personally didn't want people feeling obligated to do stuff in the middle of their nighttime | 15:15 |
| ianychoi | Thank you for sharing the detailed context fungi. Just a good thing now is that two officials live in two mainly different time zones so we can cover the things happening in world-wide easily :) Since I have been seeing closing PTL after nomination (no election needed) & opening TC voting, it would be so great if slaweq sees closing TC voting period - how about that? | 15:21 |
| opendevreview | Ian Y. Choi proposed openstack/election master: Exclude TC from PTL leaderless projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/1002531 | 16:34 |
| ianychoi | TC election has been started - 122 voters did not opt-in CIVS so I sent a direct reminder e-mail copying to slaweq. Although the above patch is waiting for reviews, it is trivial so I announced PTL results via openstack-discuss & openstack-announce aliases. For openstack-announce alias, I believe fungi or admins can help to change the current 'Hold' status to release it. | 23:53 |
| fungi | yes, doing so now | 23:54 |
| Clark[m] | Fwiw I got my ballot so that seems to have worked as expected for those of us who have opted in | 23:56 |
| fungi | Subject: Poll: OpenStack 2027.1 Cycle Technical Committee Election Poll | 23:56 |
| fungi | me too! | 23:56 |
| ianychoi | Thank you for the confirmations! | 23:56 |
| fungi | "Thank you. Your vote for OpenStack 2027.1 Cycle Technical Committee Election Poll has been successfully cast." | 23:57 |
| fungi | things seem to be generally working | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!