| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 00:41 | |
| *** hoangcx has joined #openstack-fwaas | 00:48 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 00:49 | |
| *** diogogmt has quit IRC | 00:52 | |
| *** SridarK has quit IRC | 01:34 | |
| *** diogogmt has joined #openstack-fwaas | 01:39 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-fwaas | 01:43 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 01:48 | |
| hoangcx | njohnston: Hi | 01:55 |
|---|---|---|
| hoangcx | njohnston: Will the FWaaS team meeting hold at the same time as usual? Or change to another slot? | 01:56 |
| *** yushiro has joined #openstack-fwaas | 03:50 | |
| xgerman | I think same time | 04:52 |
| *** SridarK has joined #openstack-fwaas | 05:51 | |
| SridarK | yushiro: ping | 06:02 |
| yushiro | SridarK: pong | 06:03 |
| SridarK | yushiro: quick question - did we meet today | 06:03 |
| SridarK | i think with the time change - i got confused | 06:03 |
| yushiro | Ah, I also confused.. However, I attended usual time (13:00JST) but nobody exists ; | 06:04 |
| SridarK | yushiro: ok - i did not see the logs either | 06:05 |
| SridarK | we changed the clocks in the US | 06:06 |
| SridarK | sigh ok never mind | 06:06 |
| SridarK | i am looking thru the CLI patch | 06:06 |
| yushiro | OK. njohnston suggested http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/106410.html and decided 1st proposal. | 06:08 |
| yushiro | SridarK, njohnston sorry I forgot to reply e-mail about this suggestion. | 06:08 |
| SridarK | yushiro: no we decided in the last mtg - but i also meant to confirm with njohnston today | 06:09 |
| yushiro | Ah, OK. | 06:09 |
| SridarK | and i forgot during the day time | 06:09 |
| yushiro | I understand. Thank you. | 06:09 |
| SridarK | np i think the only discussion items we had were for the stadium | 06:10 |
| yushiro | BTW, could you wait for reviewing my CLI patch? Because I have to update my patch today. | 06:11 |
| yushiro | I discussed with Akihiro and he agreed to customize his utility patch. | 06:12 |
| yushiro | Also, he will propose his utility patch into osc-lib. | 06:12 |
| yushiro | I'll update my CLI patch within TODAY! | 06:12 |
| yushiro | BTW, quick question.. firewall_group always returns 'ports', don't you? Currently, only POST/PUT returns 'ports'. | 06:14 |
| SridarK | yushiro: ok on the CLI patch | 06:18 |
| SridarK | let me check fwg | 06:18 |
| yushiro | Sure | 06:18 |
| SridarK | u mean on the delete ? | 06:20 |
| SridarK | we dont | 06:21 |
| SridarK | on the plugin from the code standpoint - we kind of treat ports differently to accomodate how we handle on the db layer | 06:22 |
| SridarK | maybe i am not understanding ur question | 06:22 |
| SridarK | ok i see may be an issue on GET ? | 06:26 |
| *** _MoonWolf_ has left #openstack-fwaas | 06:26 | |
| yushiro | sorry for confusing. Let me paste some result.. | 06:32 |
| SridarK | yushiro: ok i think i may see one issue | 06:33 |
| SridarK | but let me check the paste | 06:34 |
| yushiro | http://paste.openstack.org/show/588508/ | 06:34 |
| yushiro | POST, PUT returns 'ports' as response parameter. GET(list, show) no 'ports' returns as response parameter. | 06:35 |
| SridarK | yushiro: yes u are correct | 06:35 |
| SridarK | i see the issue | 06:35 |
| SridarK | let me fix it | 06:35 |
| yushiro | oh, Thanks. Can I file a bug now? | 06:35 |
| yushiro | on Launchpad | 06:35 |
| SridarK | oh yes pls | 06:36 |
| yushiro | Sure. | 06:36 |
| SridarK | and assign it to me, i can use that for the fix | 06:36 |
| yushiro | Done! https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1640395 | 06:37 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1640395 in neutron "Missing 'ports' attribute when GET firewall-groups" [Undecided,New] | 06:37 |
| yushiro | Sridar, I cannot find your launchpad name(skandasw) I don't know why... | 06:39 |
| SridarK | hmm not sure - but i assigned it to myself | 06:40 |
| SridarK | thanks | 06:40 |
| yushiro | OK. | 06:40 |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 07:14 | |
| SridarK | yushiro: i will have a patch tomorrow morning our time | 07:36 |
| yushiro | SridarK: Sure. I'll review it :) | 07:36 |
| SridarK | ok i am signing off | 07:36 |
| yushiro | see u | 07:45 |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 08:10 | |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 08:38 | |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 08:56 | |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 08:57 | |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 09:04 | |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 09:06 | |
| mfranc213 | yushiro ping | 09:08 |
| yushiro | mfranc213, pong | 09:08 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: how are you? | 09:09 |
| yushiro | mfranc213, Fine thanks :) BTW, sorry for yesterday. I didn't notice your ping | 09:09 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: no apologies. we are on very different schedules. i have a question for you. is there a way that i can see the resulting api-ref without sending it through the gate? | 09:10 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Sure. | 09:11 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: I think "tox -e api-ref" can bulid on your local environment. | 09:14 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: after "tox -e api-ref" command, you can check a result by accessing with some browser(I.E, Firefox...) | 09:16 |
| mfranc213 | which file is it that i look at? | 09:18 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Maybe api-ref/build/html. I'll try it now. | 09:19 |
| yushiro | I checked it. You should look at api-ref/build/html | 09:25 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: "python -m SimpleHTTPServer" is easy to build HTTP server. It's my recommend :) | 09:27 |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 09:28 | |
| mfranc213 | thank you yushiro. i'll try this later. right now it's not building because i've made a lot of changes. | 09:28 |
| mfranc213 | i want you to know that i've abandoned things like audited_4 because it's totally confusing. so instead i've created | 09:29 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Definitely agree. It is so confusing & not easy to understand. | 09:29 |
| mfranc213 | variables like audited_body_required (for instance). this is transparent and i hope others won't object. | 09:29 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro what time is it right now for you? | 09:31 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: It's 18:32. I'll be in my office at 23:00 today :) | 09:33 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: thank you. it's 04:33 for me. i'm going to start working again soon. why will you be working so late? | 09:33 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Because I have to create some presentation files for summit report within this weekend. TBH, I'd like to focus on writing/reviewing codes :) | 09:36 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: So, can I wait reviewing for your latest PS? | 09:37 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: yes. i need to review what i've done, add parameters, and then i will push the next PS for you to review. i think this will take me 2 or 3 hours but that's a guess. will that be okay for you? | 09:41 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Sure! | 09:41 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Ah, in previous review comments, please ignore that "it shuld be Optional at response params". I wanted to say at request params. This is my mistake. | 09:41 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro. thank you. TBH i didn't understand how this whole thing worked until you provided your first review, and then i started to see. so now i think it will be much more correct. | 09:42 |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 09:43 | |
| yushiro | mfranc213: I see. I also put the comment that is easy to understand :) | 09:45 |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 10:07 | |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 10:11 | |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 10:15 | |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 10:16 | |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: yes, your comments were extremely helpful. | 10:18 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: do you understand why the commands are listed in the order they are (insert rule, show policy details, update policy, etc.)? | 10:22 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: hmm, I think the order is same as api-ref/source/v2/fwaas-v2.inc. How about moving these sections? | 10:23 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: yes, that is where the order is taken from; i'm sorry my question was ambiguous. what i meant, really, was: would it be okay with the community if i changed these sections around? | 10:25 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: i'm going to go ahead and do it. | 10:25 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Ah, I just understood what you mean. | 10:26 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Sorry, I don't know. I watched other resources API ref, they weren't ordered at all.. | 10:29 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: thank you. i will order them and we'll see what people have to say :) | 10:29 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: IMO, a title explains (fwaas, firewall_groups, firewall_policies, firewall_rules). So, how about aligning it? | 10:30 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: yes, good idea. that's what i'll do. | 10:31 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: i had a couple of questions for you on the PS if you have time to look. also, i wonder if you might be able to get me the JSON for some of the commands? if you don't have time, then don't worry. | 10:31 |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Sure. Is it maybe the JSON for firewall_group?( ports is missing) | 10:33 |
| mfranc213 | yes, that's one of them. | 10:33 |
| mfranc213 | and the sample firewall-policy-show-response.json doesn't show firewall_list and i think that may be wrong. | 10:34 |
| yushiro | mfranc213, OK. Let me explain about firewall-group JSON. | 10:35 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: excellent. | 10:35 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: This is fwaas-v2 bug. I filed a bug report(https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1640395) | 10:35 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1640395 in neutron "Missing 'ports' attribute when GET firewall-groups" [Low,Confirmed] - Assigned to Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw) | 10:35 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: 'ports' attribute includes when POST/PUT as response param. However, currently, GET(list, show) result doesn't include 'ports'. | 10:36 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: ahhh! how do you think i should handle this? should i mark it in the api-ref as a bug? or just not mention it? (just to confirm with you: we are talking about GET /v2.0/fwaas/firewall_groups/{firewall_group_id} ?) | 10:37 |
| mfranc213 | s/not mention it/not mention that variable as being in the response | 10:37 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: I think that api-ref should be included 'ports' as a response parameter for all methods GET(list, show),POST and PUT firewall-group. | 10:39 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Currently, SridarK is trying to fix above bug. | 10:39 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: okay, that's what i'll do. | 10:39 |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 10:40 | |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: neither firewall-policy-show-response.json and firewall-policy-update-response.json contain the firewall_list variable, but i think they both should. what do you think? | 10:40 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: hmm, is it 'firewall_rules' ? | 10:41 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: no, firewall_rules is a separate variable. my understanding is that firewall_list is the list of firewall (groups) that a policy is attached to. you'll see that this is part of the response in insert-rule-in-policy. see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391338/7..8/api-ref/source/v2/fwaas-v2.inc@86 | 10:44 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: I checked it. | 10:50 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: what did you find? | 10:51 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: 1st: In current source code, 'firewall_list' is used only fwaas-v1. | 10:54 |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 10:54 | |
| yushiro | mfranc213: 2nd: In fwaas-v2 SPEC[1], the response params for 'insert rule' is same 'GET/PUT firewall_policy' [1]http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/newton/fwaas-api-2.0.html | 10:54 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Please let me investigate more.. | 10:56 |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 10:57 | |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 10:57 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-fwaas | 10:58 | |
| *** hoangcx has quit IRC | 10:59 | |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: thank you. | 10:59 |
| *** korzen has joined #openstack-fwaas | 11:07 | |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: do you know if the id, name, and description in firewall-policy-insert-rule-response.json are for the policy or the rule? the response contains firewall_rules and audited, which are are properties of the policy, but all the other variables in the response could be properties of either the rule or its policy. | 11:07 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: and i have the same questions about firewall-policy-remove-rule-response.json | 11:08 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: id, name and description is for firewall-policy. | 11:10 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: thank you. | 11:10 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: it's same as remove-rule-response. | 11:10 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: thank you. | 11:10 |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 11:43 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-fwaas | 12:13 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 12:28 | |
| korzen | hi, is there fwaas team meeting in 15 minutes? | 12:45 |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-fwaas | 12:46 | |
| korzen | hi SridarK, ^ ? | 12:49 |
| yushiro | korzen, Long time no see from Barcelona summit :) Unfortunately, the weekly meeting time has not decided yet correctly. | 12:57 |
| korzen | yeap, hi yushiro | 12:59 |
| korzen | ok, I was hoping to join todays meeting | 13:00 |
| yushiro | Sure! | 13:00 |
| yushiro | ping mfranc213 | 13:00 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro hello | 13:05 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Sorry for late. Let me talk about 'firewall_list' for 'insert/remove_rule' | 13:07 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: sounds good | 13:07 |
| yushiro | In fwaas-v2, there is no attribute 'firewall_list' in firewall-policy. | 13:08 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: excellent. i will remove that everywhere i see it. | 13:08 |
| yushiro | Here is a result for insert_rule and remove_rule. http://paste.openstack.org/show/588549/ | 13:08 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: nice i will put this into the PS. | 13:09 |
| yushiro | Source code point of view, there is no DB to store a relation b/w firewall_group and firewall_policy because firewall_group stores them as "ingress_firewall_policy_id" and "egress_firewall_policy_id". | 13:10 |
| yushiro | Therefore, 'firewall_list' is not necessary. | 13:10 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: that makes sense. thank you for figuring this out. | 13:12 |
| *** vhoward has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:12 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 13:17 | |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: a firewall rule might have a null ip_version, correct? | 13:22 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: A default value of ip_version is 4(integer), and either 4 or 6. | 13:25 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: If a user doesn't specify 'ip_version', it is set 4 by default[1] | 13:27 |
| yushiro | [1] https://github.com/openstack/neutron-fwaas/blob/master/neutron_fwaas/extensions/firewall_v2.py#L217 | 13:27 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: when a firewall rule applies to any ip address coming from a particular port, what should the ip_version be set to? | 13:27 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: ip_version should align with ip address(source_ip_address or destination_ip_address) when creating firewall-rule. A validation exists[2] | 13:33 |
| yushiro | [2]https://github.com/openstack/neutron-fwaas/blob/master/neutron_fwaas/extensions/firewall_v2.py#L217 | 13:33 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Please let me know if I don't answer to your question. | 13:33 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: oh i see. thank you. sorry you had to answer twice. | 13:33 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: np. I'd like to help for fwaas members. | 13:34 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: :) | 13:35 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: does insert_after mean that the new rule will be inserted immediately after the specified rule, or just anywhere after? | 13:39 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: "inserted immediately after the specified rule" is right. | 13:41 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: thank you. | 13:41 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: "insert_before" is also "inserted immediately before the specified rule". | 13:41 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: thank you. | 13:45 |
| yushiro | mfranc213, :) | 13:45 |
| korzen | I am trying to setup devstack with fwaas, but docs page seems lacking local.conf entries: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron-fwaas/devstack.html | 13:55 |
| korzen | can you share you local conf or point me to working one? | 13:56 |
| *** vhoward has quit IRC | 14:00 | |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 14:06 | |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: what is the default status of a firewall group? if a user creates a firewall group with no status, what happens? | 14:11 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: At first, 'status' can not specify from a user. | 14:12 |
| mfranc213 | you mean when the user creates the firewall group, no status can be set? | 14:13 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Sorry. What I wanted to say is that user cannot specify the attributes 'status' when creating a firewall-group. | 14:13 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: okay, is there a default status for a newly created firewall_group? | 14:14 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: when user creates firewall-group with no ports, the 'status' is 'INACTIVE'. | 14:14 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro. thank you. is there a default admin_state_up for a newly created firewall_group? | 14:15 |
| SridarK | korzen: hi | 14:16 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Default value of 'admin_state_up' is "True" | 14:17 |
| SridarK | sorry had gone to bed when u pinged me | 14:17 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: thank you. | 14:17 |
| korzen | SridarK, no problem, I was trying to figure out if there is team meeting today | 14:17 |
| SridarK | korzen: no there was some confusion on our part too - we decided to move the mtg to a more friendly time (urself included) | 14:18 |
| SridarK | we will make sure to have an email out to the fwaas team as well - so u will get a heads up | 14:19 |
| SridarK | mfranc213: yushiro: +1 on status | 14:20 |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| SridarK | status is something that comes back from the server | 14:20 |
| yushiro | Yes. | 14:20 |
| SridarK | yushiro: thx for the info on generating from rst file - i meant to ask ur workflow on this also | 14:25 |
| SridarK | i will try it | 14:25 |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 14:25 | |
| yushiro | OK :) | 14:25 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: i have one more question and then i can push the next PS. is it the case that the user can supply either the insert_after or the insert_before, but not both? | 14:34 |
| yushiro | If both 'insert_after' and 'insert_before' specified, 'insert_after' is ignored.('insert_before' wins) | 14:36 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: thank you. and i lied before, because i have one more question :) | 14:37 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: when there are not yet any rules in a policy, then does the user specify neither a before nor an after? | 14:38 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: Sure. | 14:38 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: i lied again because i realize another question: what happens if a user specifies a before or an after that doesn't exist on that policy? | 14:38 |
| SridarK | mfranc213: i believe we will raise an exc on that | 14:50 |
| SridarK | https://github.com/openstack/neutron-fwaas/blob/master/neutron_fwaas/db/firewall/v2/firewall_db_v2.py#L316 | 14:50 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: 1st, Yes, Sridar is correct. It happens 400 Bad Request. | 14:50 |
| mfranc213 | thank you SridarK. yushiro, i will push the PS in a minute or two. i'm sorry it's so late in the evening for you. | 14:51 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: 2nd, | 14:51 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: ah, sorry. it is same question. | 14:51 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: when insert_rule, if user specified firewall_rule_id which is already associated the policy, 409(Conflict)[3] occurs. | 14:53 |
| yushiro | [3]https://github.com/openstack/neutron-fwaas/blob/master/neutron_fwaas/db/firewall/v2/firewall_db_v2.py#L301 | 14:53 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: OK. that's sounds great. | 14:53 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro and sridark: okay new PS is up. yushiro thank you for answering a million questions :) | 14:56 |
| SridarK | mfranc213: thx | 14:56 |
| yushiro | mfranc213: You're welcome :) | 14:56 |
| *** korzen_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 14:58 | |
| yushiro | SridarK: Sorry for late. I just updated CLI patch(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351582/) | 15:01 |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
| SridarK | yushiro: ok thx - no prob i just woke up some time ago :-) So will look into it in a few hours | 15:02 |
| yushiro | mfranc213, SridarK I'll go home now :) See you today(It's 0:02 JST) | 15:02 |
| mfranc213 | yushiro: goodnight. | 15:02 |
| SridarK | :-) | 15:02 |
| SridarK | GN yushiro | 15:02 |
| yushiro | good night~ :) | 15:03 |
| *** yushiro has quit IRC | 15:03 | |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:06 | |
| *** vhoward has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:09 | |
| *** diogogmt has quit IRC | 15:13 | |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** korzen has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:39 | |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 16:14 | |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 16:21 | |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
| *** andrein has joined #openstack-fwaas | 17:26 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 17:31 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 17:33 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 17:33 | |
| *** andrein has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
| *** SridarK has quit IRC | 17:55 | |
| *** vhoward has quit IRC | 18:53 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-fwaas | 18:55 | |
| *** SridarK_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 18:55 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 18:59 | |
| *** diogogmt has joined #openstack-fwaas | 19:03 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-fwaas | 19:21 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 19:25 | |
| *** vhoward has joined #openstack-fwaas | 20:08 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 20:14 | |
| njohnston | SridarK_: ping | 20:47 |
| SridarK_ | njohnston: pong | 20:47 |
| SridarK_ | njohnston: pls go ahead - i wanted to ask u some thing also | 20:47 |
| njohnston | I just wanted to let you know that I have been having difficulty finding a time for the fwaas team meeting that is at (or generally pretty close) to the time we voted for... the irc channels are occupied then | 20:48 |
| njohnston | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393793/ | 20:48 |
| njohnston | I don't want to confuse things, it's definitely important that we meet this week since it's the last meeting before the 11/14 O-1 deadline but I am not sure if we should just meet in #openstack-fwaas or what, until we get this sorted out | 20:49 |
| SridarK_ | njohnston: ok - i wanted to also sync with u on that, meant to ask u y'day before ur day ended | 20:50 |
| njohnston | I was out yesterday - I work as an election officer at my local precinct, so I was offline all day | 20:50 |
| SridarK_ | no i agree - we should meet, last night yushiro and i chatted a bit in general | 20:50 |
| SridarK_ | aha ok | 20:51 |
| SridarK_ | or we can do a webex style meeting | 20:51 |
| SridarK_ | for tomorrow or late today | 20:51 |
| njohnston | I am amenable to anything | 20:52 |
| SridarK_ | ok we can try for tonight also, but not sure on yushiro, chandan & Sarath's avail | 20:53 |
| SridarK_ | we will only hear from them in the eve | 20:53 |
| SridarK_ | shall we try for early am tomorrow | 20:54 |
| SridarK_ | so it gives them some time to respond | 20:54 |
| njohnston | sounds good | 20:54 |
| SridarK_ | we can target 6am Pacific | 20:54 |
| SridarK_ | i will check their resp late night and u can checkin early before i wake up | 20:55 |
| SridarK_ | if we need to adjust the timings a bit | 20:55 |
| njohnston | thanks! | 20:55 |
| SridarK_ | let me send an email out | 20:56 |
| SridarK_ | on the multinode CI - what else remains to be done ? | 20:56 |
| njohnston | Well, it is in the experimental queue right now | 20:58 |
| njohnston | I just tried it on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391477/ and the multinode jobs both died | 20:59 |
| njohnston | failed, I mean | 20:59 |
| njohnston | now, I also put in the grenade tests as multinode also | 20:59 |
| SridarK_ | njohnston: ok | 20:59 |
| njohnston | but they won't mean much until we put in smoke tests | 21:00 |
| njohnston | which is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/394607/ | 21:00 |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 21:01 | |
| SridarK_ | sounds good - i will get on this | 21:04 |
| *** vhoward has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| *** vhoward has joined #openstack-fwaas | 21:46 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-fwaas | 21:50 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 21:53 | |
| *** vhoward has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
| *** SridarK_ has quit IRC | 23:46 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!