| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/glance master: Add missing oslo_limit options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/812499 | 12:48 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/glance master: Add missing oslo_limit options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/812499 | 12:54 |
| abhishekk | dansmith, o/ | 14:02 |
| dansmith | hey | 14:02 |
| abhishekk | good morning | 14:02 |
| abhishekk | I am planning to keep important sessions on Wednesday and Thursday between 14 and 16 UTC | 14:03 |
| dansmith | okay | 14:03 |
| abhishekk | I think you will be busy on Monday and Tuesday in TC sessions | 14:03 |
| dansmith | and friday I thought | 14:04 |
| * dansmith looks | 14:04 | |
| abhishekk | I will publish tentative schedule tomorrow and if required we can reshuffle it later as per convenience of all members | 14:04 |
| dansmith | cool, thanks, at least it's a start :) | 14:05 |
| abhishekk | yep | 14:06 |
| abhishekk | and all the best for your session :D | 14:06 |
| dansmith | ah, no TC is on thursday too | 14:06 |
| dansmith | not tuesday | 14:06 |
| abhishekk | let me know if anything is needed from my side | 14:06 |
| abhishekk | ack, then Tuesday and Wednesday we will cover some important topics | 14:07 |
| dansmith | but should be okay, I hope there will be enough slack to move individual topics if needed | 14:07 |
| dansmith | okay | 14:07 |
| abhishekk | right | 14:07 |
| dansmith | on the infra live thing, should be no problem.. very short and I have slides in there already | 14:07 |
| abhishekk | cool | 14:07 |
| abhishekk | will see it once it is published, thank you for doing it | 14:08 |
| dansmith | np :) | 14:08 |
| abhishekk | great, over and out :D | 14:08 |
| dansmith | :) | 14:09 |
| simondodsley | If I am using Cinder as the Glance store, but Glance is configured for 3 node HA, two questions: 1) Is Glance in HA A/A/A or A/P/P, and 2) Does Glance require a separate Cinder volume for each HA instance, or can it use Cinder multi-attach? | 15:02 |
| dansmith | simondodsley: you probably want whoami-rajat__ or rosmaita | 15:07 |
| whoami-rajat__ | simondodsley, hey, which openstack release are you using? | 15:13 |
| *** whoami-rajat__ is now known as whoami-rajat | 15:13 | |
| simondodsley | whoami-rajat__: Victoria | 15:13 |
| whoami-rajat | simondodsley, ok and are you using single store setup or multistore ? | 15:15 |
| simondodsley | single store | 15:15 |
| whoami-rajat | simondodsley, ok, I'm not sure about 1) but for 2) all glance nodes should point to the same c-vol backend/service | 15:18 |
| whoami-rajat | we implemented multiple stores for cinder in victoria where you can configure multiple cinder stores and point each store to a specific c-vol backend with the help of volume types | 15:18 |
| whoami-rajat | and use of multiattach is implemented in Xena release but it might be for a different purpose than you might be asking for | 15:18 |
| simondodsley | whoami-rajat i get the single backend/service, but when the images are stored they will be n a cinder volume, but the question is if there needs to be a seperate volume for each glance instance, or can the multiple instances use a single cinder volume leveraging multi-attach | 15:19 |
| whoami-rajat | simondodsley, ok, so for each glance image, there will be a cinder volume created (storing that image), we can't store multiple glance images in a single cinder volume | 15:41 |
| simondodsley | whoami-rajat, understood. similar question in a Glance HA config does each Glance instance need its own copy of the same image, so there would be multiple cinder volumes for each image? | 15:49 |
| jokke_ | simondodsley: whoami-rajat: All Glance nodes are active but there is only single volume per image. I think there was some issues with accessing that image through multiple g-apis which was very recently fixed with some of the multi-attach work Rajat has been doing. | 15:49 |
| simondodsley | jokke_, that's the info I needed. Thank you. | 15:49 |
| jokke_ | IIRC the main issue was that if there is multiple g-api nodes trying to attach to the volume at very same time, they failed as there was no retry mechanism | 15:50 |
| jokke_ | and cinder locks the volume while the attach happens | 15:51 |
| simondodsley | so it is Xena where this is resolved? | 15:51 |
| jokke_ | simondodsley: yeah I'm pretty sure this is the patch ecda7f640fe4e807ba07981abfc1a637ddb496cd in Xena release that solved the issue and allows Glance to do multiattach properly now | 15:53 |
| simondodsley | thanks | 15:53 |
| jokke_ | simondodsley: The Cinder driver was for long time on a state "Yeah it kind of works but don't even think of doing anything weird with it" whoami-rajat has done lots of work to plug all those corner cases we've came across even me going on every second of them like "Should we really do this in the driver, seriously?" ;D | 15:58 |
| jokke_ | so almost anything that actually works smooth with that driver is his fault :P | 15:59 |
| simondodsley | good to know - I'll keep that in mind when my customer breaks it with their weird edge case :) | 16:00 |
| croelandt | Isn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1251061 quite invalid these days? | 16:55 |
| abhishekk | croelandt, right | 16:58 |
| opendevreview | Cyril Roelandt proposed openstack/python-glanceclient master: Make "tox -edocs" generate the manpage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-glanceclient/+/812536 | 18:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!