Wednesday, 2025-01-29

semanticHi guys!04:48
semanticWe somehow missed the moment when glance-scrubber was deprecated. We've been actively used glance scrubber and delayed_delete feature in our production cloud for last five years. We use swift as our backend storage, so I believe image deletion time is actually a function of data size. Moreover, we tend to delete large number of large images (backups/snapshots) of  instances on a schedule. It seems that glance-scrubber 04:48
semanticremoval will negatively affect us, or maybe we're missing something here, that you may advice?.. Does nobody really use scrubber?04:48
opendevreviewAbhishek Kekane proposed openstack/glance master: Remove S3 credentials from debug log  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/94035805:29
*** tkajinam is now known as Guest733409:05
*** whoami-rajat_ is now known as whoami-rajat14:02
*** Guest7381 is now known as bbezak14:56
bbezakHi - I'm wondering about back-portability of this patch (and glance_store counterpart) - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/93471614:59
rosmaitasemantic: I put an item on the weekly meeting agenda to discuss glance-scrubber: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda14:59
bbezakbug is pretty nasty. slowing down significantly image list operation on bigger clouds14:59
bbezakin caracal15:00
rosmaitabbezak: seems like a reasonable backport, i think the main thing to do is to check to make sure there's a tempest test or something that is using the store weight, so we know it won't cause a regression15:04
rosmaita(since the code is currently only in master)15:04
rosmaitaor if you are using the patch locally with success, you could report that15:05
bbezakthx. I'll test that in test env15:21
bbezak(and report back)15:37
rosmaitasounds good!15:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!