| *** venkat has joined #openstack-gslb | 10:37 | |
| venkat | Hi Doug | 10:39 |
|---|---|---|
| venkat | I went through Kosmos info available in github on specs etc and had a question on kosmos client i.e, whether kosmos will have a seperate client or will be adding api commands to openstackclient ? just want to know any plan on this etc.. | 10:44 |
| bmidgley | hi venkat | 12:36 |
| venkat | hi brad | 12:39 |
| *** mpbnka_ has joined #openstack-gslb | 12:41 | |
| bmidgley | Doug will get a notification if we say dougwig | 13:05 |
| dougwig | Indeed. | 13:08 |
| *** mpbnka_ has quit IRC | 13:43 | |
| bmidgley | dougwig, so a CLI client belongs in the new openstackclient? or would it be standalone | 14:12 |
| *** venkat has quit IRC | 14:23 | |
| mugsie | bmidgley: it should be in openstack client | 15:32 |
| mugsie | as a plugin | 15:32 |
| mugsie | in the same repo as the python bindings | 15:32 |
| bmidgley | kk | 15:33 |
| dougwig | bmidgley: i agree on the osc plugin; i tend to like to see them in separate repos, because pulling in server requirements onto client machines is a sucky experience. unless there's a way to not do that, that works with infra tooling. | 15:40 |
| dougwig | mugsie: && | 15:40 |
| mugsie | yeah, and (IMHO) they are separate deiverables - the client should work with a few different versions of the server | 15:41 |
| mugsie | (for basic operations, obviously new features wont be in old clients) | 15:41 |
| *** mpbnka has joined #openstack-gslb | 16:28 | |
| bmidgley | yeah to decoupling these | 17:02 |
| *** mpbnka____ has joined #openstack-gslb | 19:49 | |
| *** mpbnka has quit IRC | 19:52 | |
| bmidgley | dougwig: the existing time might actually be ok, this just wasn’t a good week with people out of office | 20:11 |
| dougwig | bmidgley: ok | 21:27 |
| *** mpbnka____ has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!