opendevreview | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/project-config master: Normalize projects.yaml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/887126 | 02:28 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Normalize projects.yaml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/887126 | 05:58 |
dpawlik | hi melwitt. Updating field types is possible only with privileged user. In ci-log-processing we have only backup of Opensearch Dashboards objects, like global index, but so far we don't have index template definition. If there is such one, I'm changing it manually (it was once per few months). If you would like to add it quick, you can propose a | 06:26 |
dpawlik | patch that is adding new field like "build_change_url" in logsender | 06:26 |
dpawlik | or change the field type in logsender to string, then I will do an update in Opensearch | 06:26 |
dpawlik | but TBH, new field would be better | 06:26 |
dpawlik | I would like to make a release next month, then make some automatization (for few months don' have time to come back to that topic ;/ ) | 06:27 |
ykarel | Hi is it known thing that launchpad bugs are not being updated((Like New -> In progress)) with gerrit events from some days? | 06:34 |
opendevreview | daniel.pawlik proposed openstack/ci-log-processing master: Check if directories is not too old even when it got match files https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ci-log-processing/+/886587 | 06:48 |
frickler | ykarel: lp is only updated on patch creation and merge, not on intermediate updates, does that match what you are seeing? | 06:49 |
ykarel | frickler, yes | 06:50 |
ykarel | example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/887036 | 06:55 |
ykarel | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2025056 | 06:55 |
ykarel | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2025129 | 06:56 |
opendevreview | Caio Cesar Ferreira proposed openstack/project-config master: Add Power Metrics app to StarlingX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/886814 | 11:36 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:16 | |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Add Power Metrics app to StarlingX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/886814 | 12:38 |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:01 | |
melwitt | dpawlik: ack, I'll take a look at logsender, thanks! | 15:26 |
melwitt | I noticed the same issue as ykarel on monday, new upload of a patch with Closes-Bug didn't update the lp bug to In Progress | 15:31 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:54 | |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/project-config master: Fix release-id fetching for release job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/887222 | 18:49 |
fungi | melwitt: ykarel: yes, if it's in the commit message on the initial patchset it should try to comment on the bug, set the bugtask status for that series to in progress and assign the bugtask to the change owner, but a quick skim of gerrit's error log shows a lot of calls to the patchset-created hook script exiting nonzero, though no details as to why | 19:49 |
fungi | i did at least check that neutron (for the quoted example change) is correctly set in launchpad so that the infra account is a member of the bug supervisor group for the project | 19:50 |
fungi | probably either a recent change regressed jeepyb or something has changed in a non-backward-compatible way in launchpad's api | 19:50 |
melwitt | fungi: thanks for checking into it. my first thought was I wondered if my patch somehow broke it https://opendev.org/opendev/jeepyb/commit/5db1d05b70ca01f2deed7b5809e239f609e1590f but the change is not patchset-merged, not patchset-created? | 19:51 |
melwitt | not much has changed recently https://opendev.org/opendev/jeepyb/commits/branch/master | 19:54 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Fix release-id fetching for release job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/887222 | 19:56 |
fungi | yes, i also skimmed the jeepyb change history and nothing jumped out at me, but we don't really have great functional testing for any of that so it could have been something subtle | 19:58 |
fungi | i'd dig deeper, but am traveling this week and not really around | 19:58 |
melwitt | ack, thanks | 20:01 |
simondodsley | did something change in the last few months with zuul jobs. My 3rd Party CI (running on Software Factory) is refusing to run devstack jobs. Turning on debug for zuul shows matching parents for `openstack-multinode-fips`. Our zuul config doesn't have that, just `multinode` | 21:25 |
simondodsley | Also see this error message from zuul: | 21:41 |
simondodsley | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/4aSrEYnk/ | 21:41 |
clarkb | simondodsley: in order to support fips in jobs there was a very base like job added to toggle fips on | 22:15 |
clarkb | in general many things could have changed though so that may not be the issue or the only issue | 22:15 |
simondodsley | clarkb: it seems that the new job is in my software factory system, but zuul isn't picking it up for some reason. SF stopped working 2 months ago, I now discover when this patch went in | 22:17 |
simondodsley | any idea how to force SF to reload the zuul job definitions | 22:17 |
clarkb | I have no idea | 22:17 |
simondodsley | okay | 22:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!