pcheli | Hello, I'm setting up ThirdParty CI with jenkins and gerrit-trigger plugin. Generally, it works. However, results posting fails with Too many concurrent connections (96) - max. allowed: 96. | 09:01 |
---|---|---|
pcheli | Can anyone help with this? | 09:01 |
*** d34dh0r5- is now known as d34dh0r53 | 12:20 | |
stephenfin | clarkb: fungi: We were discussing getting OSC/SDK back on Launchpad just now. Stop me if you've heard this all before, but it seems we have existing projects and dtroyer is sole admin for many of them. I've no idea how to get in touch with Dean nowadays so am considering reaching out to the Launchpad admins and asking them to move it to gtema or I | 14:25 |
stephenfin | Before I do, does that sound reasonable and have have you folks any experience interacting with the launchpad admins? | 14:25 |
fungi | stephenfin: if ~openstack-admins is the owner of any groups i can add myself to them as a temporary admin and then add/change the member lists | 14:26 |
fungi | but reaching out to the people who do still have control over them is the best first step | 14:27 |
fungi | which specific projects on lp are these? | 14:27 |
stephenfin | For OSC, it's this one https://launchpad.net/~python-openstackclient/+members#active | 14:27 |
stephenfin | For SDK, I think it's this one: https://launchpad.net/~python-osdk-team | 14:28 |
clarkb | yes I would reach out to dean first. I'm sure we can find an email address | 14:28 |
clarkb | corvus is admin on that first one | 14:29 |
clarkb | so could help with that one as well | 14:29 |
fungi | both those teams are owned by ~openstack-admins too, if necessary | 14:29 |
stephenfin | they are? how can you tell that? | 14:29 |
clarkb | fungi: the second one isn't? its owned by 'jnoller' | 14:30 |
clarkb | stephenfin: on the main page for the group it shows the owner | 14:30 |
stephenfin | ahh, so it does | 14:30 |
fungi | er, yeah ~python-openstackclient is the only one owned by ~openstack-admins | 14:30 |
* stephenfin was looking at /+members | 14:30 | |
fungi | i must have pulled it up twice | 14:30 |
fungi | i agree the one with jnoller as the owner and only admin is going to be the tougher nut to crack | 14:31 |
fungi | someone will need to try to reach out | 14:31 |
stephenfin | I can do that | 14:31 |
stephenfin | fungi: For ~python-openstackclient, if we can skip reaching out to Dean would you be able to add gtema and I as admins and we can clean up the list? | 14:33 |
stephenfin | assuming I understood you correctly | 14:33 |
fungi | stephenfin: yeah, in this case i can be pretty sure it's not in use for anything since the project was on storyboard for a while | 14:34 |
fungi | stephenfin: what are your lp usernames? | 14:35 |
stephenfin | gtema is gtema | 14:35 |
stephenfin | mine is stephenfinucane | 14:35 |
fungi | stephenfin: done | 14:36 |
stephenfin | thanks | 14:45 |
stephenfin | done on my end also | 14:45 |
clarkb | stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/898129 is a low ish priority item on my plate. Thats driven by opendev trying to stop building older docker base images. I'm not sure when osc will switch python3.11 testing to voting but when it does it would be good to land this as well | 14:46 |
stephenfin | fine by me | 14:47 |
stephenfin | We use openstack-python3-jobs, so I had assumed we'd have switched Python 3.11 to voting already tbh | 14:48 |
clarkb | oh you're waiting on the global switch | 14:48 |
stephenfin | yup | 14:48 |
stephenfin | Do we need the Bugs, Core and Drivers teams on Launchpad or can we remove them as sub teams? Ideally they should be deleted if so but I don't know if that's possible | 14:53 |
stephenfin | Oh, you can do that from the homepage of the group also | 14:53 |
clarkb | stephenfin: the different groups are used for different privileges iirc. Drivers have historically had all the permissions. Core less and bugs fewer | 14:54 |
clarkb | You can probably get away with drivers and core. Or maybe just a single group that does everything | 14:54 |
stephenfin | Are those permissions configured via the web UI also? We probably also need to be added to the three projects if we are to keep them since it appears admin permissions/membership do not cascade down | 14:57 |
clarkb | yes everything should be doable via the web ui | 14:57 |
clarkb | someone like ttx may remmeber how all of this was structured | 14:58 |
clarkb | stephenfin: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova here you can see the nova bug team is listed as bug supervisor | 14:58 |
clarkb | here you see the driver and maintainers of nova are the noav drivers team https://launchpad.net/nova | 14:58 |
clarkb | each of those give certain permissions iirc. I don't know if nova has a core and if it does where that is set or what it does | 14:59 |
stephenfin | Presumably not. https://launchpad.net/~nova-core is a 404 | 14:59 |
fungi | it used to be that "drivers" had the ability to set milestone targets, add series, approve blueprints, and similar release-related activity as well as configuring the project in lp. "bugs" was for when projects didn't want random users to be able to assign things or set priorities | 15:18 |
fungi | and then the "coresec" teams are for vulnerability management per project | 15:19 |
opendevreview | Corey Bryant proposed openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs master: Update openstack-python3-charm-jobs py3 branches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/899078 | 15:30 |
frickler | config-core: ^^ and 720544 would be nice if you have a minute | 15:38 |
fungi | sure, looking | 15:38 |
fungi | frickler: do you know if there's a change proposed to address that syntax error in osj? | 15:43 |
frickler | clarkb: what was your plan for the test in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/866054 ? just merge it and watch things for a bit? | 15:43 |
frickler | fungi: did you get confused by the storpool result like I did a couple of times? | 15:44 |
fungi | d'oh, yep! | 15:44 |
fungi | sorry ;? | 15:44 |
fungi | :/ | 15:44 |
fungi | yeah, our zuul just came back with a +1 | 15:45 |
fungi | storpool seems to be running an old version of zuul | 15:45 |
fungi | so doesn't support the newer branches syntax | 15:45 |
clarkb | frickler: I probably had a devstack rp tempest chagne depending on that let me look | 15:46 |
clarkb | frickler: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/858996 this one. But I'm not sure where that ended up sorry | 15:47 |
clarkb | frickler: Basedo n the ocmments it looks like we need to recheck until we hit a rax node and then compare the performance delta? | 15:47 |
frickler | fungi: they also should not report on patches in that repo, neither for devstack, they are a cinder CI. iirc clarkb sent them a mail but got no response | 15:48 |
clarkb | oh ya I haven't seen a response. We can probably disable that account now if we want. iirc I cc'd yall but I'll check to see if I got a direct response that didn't include you | 15:48 |
clarkb | ya no response to me | 15:49 |
frickler | clarkb: even then we might need multiple iterations on the devstack patch since io performance is variable | 15:49 |
clarkb | frickler: for the rsync thing I feel like I remember that the performance wasn't better. But I don't have hard evidence of that | 15:49 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs master: Remove pypy template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/720544 | 15:50 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs master: Update openstack-python3-charm-jobs py3 branches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/899078 | 15:50 |
frickler | o.k., let's do some more rechecks and then either do a larger test by merging or else abandon | 15:50 |
clarkb | wfm | 15:50 |
*** gce108__ is now known as gce108 | 22:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!