| opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Clean up unused labels from nl02 config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/920190 | 04:23 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Qihui Zhao proposed openstack/project-config master: to create a repo under cfn for a new-initiated sub-group cfn-security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/920264 | 08:41 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: to create a repo under cfn for a new-initiated sub-group cfn-security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/920264 | 14:26 |
| JayF | Unsure who is the right person/place to report this to, but I noticed something with the bitergio dashboard -- we're normalizing Rackspace org name to a misspelling: https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/9DVCv3rz/image.png | 17:13 |
| clarkb | JayF: I can pass that along | 17:15 |
| JayF | Thank you, just an interesting thing I noticed :D | 17:16 |
| fungi | yeah, i'm looking into it to see if it's an error in someone's foundation member profile or a typo on bitergia's part | 17:25 |
| JayF | I can confirm it's not an error on *mine* and I discovered it looking at my personal historical contributions | 17:27 |
| JayF | but interestingly enough, since then, I've seen the *correctly spelled version* in graphs as well | 17:27 |
| frickler | eandersson: fyi, your affiliation also seems to be misspelled on https://openinfra.dev/a/community/members/71900 | 17:31 |
| frickler | I've wondered a bit about my high count of added lines, then I looked at gerrit history and found https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-manuals/+/914616 | 17:38 |
| clarkb | frickler: nice way to hack the "leaderboard" | 17:39 |
| frickler | I wonder if such patches such be ignored by the bitergia stats and what would be a reasonable way to do so | 17:39 |
| frickler | also needs another update now after the 2024.1 release ;) | 17:39 |
| clarkb | might be able to do it by file type. Things like .po and .pot files. sitemap.xml etc | 17:39 |
| clarkb | but really I don't think it matters | 17:39 |
| clarkb | its accurate you just have to interpret whether or not it is meaningful | 17:39 |
| frickler | yes, same thing with gmann deleting > 1M lines with project retirements ;) | 17:40 |
| fungi | agreed. people want statistics that show what's going on and where. we're providing those. if the data isn't what they wanted, they should be able to articulate what other data they'd rather have, but i'm tired of guessing | 17:48 |
| JayF | One of my PTers working on Ironic is like #3 in commits from some bulk CI changes :) | 17:50 |
| JayF | numbers lie | 17:50 |
| gmann | I think this is open challenge/question we have since starting "how to count/weight contribution value" and stackalytics has same challenge. In Vancouver summit, I asked the same question to bitergia team if they came up with some logic. and answer was NO | 17:52 |
| gmann | I do not think number matters at lest now a days | 17:52 |
| gmann | but having bitergia counting Reviews count can give some number to calculate the contribution with combined value | 17:53 |
| gmann | but I do not thing they count review stats or I missed to check those ? | 17:53 |
| gmann | or a 'contribution' with combining the review, code, repo, email etc | 17:54 |
| clarkb | gmann: they do have review numbers | 17:55 |
| clarkb | they keep track of the number of votes posted. I don't think they track review comments | 17:56 |
| gmann | ohk, I think last time i checked I did not find and saw same question in email | 17:56 |
| JayF | The metric I've always been curious about, and IDK maybe if I learned enough about the query language I could answer it, is % of commits to a project /by people who majority commit to that project/ | 17:57 |
| gmann | and yeah, review comments are good way to know discussion participation | 17:57 |
| JayF | e.g. trying to separate "I contribute to OpenStack $project primarily" from "I contribute to OpenStack" | 17:57 |
| JayF | as a potential sign of rising/waning interest or project activity | 17:58 |
| fungi | they did have some interesting network diagramming features they demoed (was that in vancouver?) where you could see how many people were contributing to lots of different projects vs to a small number of them. its really a hard question to specify visualizations that answer it usefully though | 18:06 |
| fungi | JayF: also i think we tracked the "rackpsace" typo down to whatever table bitergia is maintaining to "deduplicate" different spellings of affiliate orgs. i directly tracked a contribution that it had affiliated with "rackpsace" back to a specific interaction/event in gerrit and then fed that user's address into the foundation member api to get a complete list of their affiliations. it | 18:08 |
| fungi | was not spelled incorrectly in their member profile data | 18:08 |
| JayF | interesting; not the biggest problem but I don't like seeing something wrong and not reporting it. I'm glad it's being fixed up | 18:09 |
| fungi | so i think ildiko is opening a support ticket with bitergia to get it fixed up | 18:09 |
| fungi | and yeah, i agree. it's not the only issue i found while going through that exercise either, the interaction was from today but the associated member profile says their affiliation with rackspace ended 7 years ago, so i don't think bitergia is correctly taking affiliation start/end times into account | 18:11 |
| JayF | I'll note I have a pretty complex set of affiliations (3 different ones, all with gaps between), so if you need an account to dig into that might have interesting results, that'd be a potential one | 18:13 |
| fungi | mine is somewhat similar, which has led it to be useful for debugging some of these complex cases as well | 18:14 |
| fungi | though my affiliation changes are clumped together at the very first years of the project, i'll keep yours in mind for one that's more spaced out | 18:16 |
| opendevreview | Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs master: Ensure correct functional jobs for unmaint branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/920312 | 18:48 |
| opendevreview | Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs master: Ensure correct functional jobs for unmaint branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/920312 | 21:00 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!
