*** __ministry is now known as Guest1021 | 02:02 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 03:51 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 06:34 | |
*** elodilles_ooo is now known as elodilles | 06:44 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 07:34 | |
gboutry | Hello, is the mirror provided in ansible var docker_mirror only a mirror for docker.io or can it mirror other registries as well? | 08:28 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | daniel.pawlik proposed openstack/ci-log-processing master: Add url subpath for Logsender to reach OpenSearch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ci-log-processing/+/926717 | 09:31 |
opendevreview | daniel.pawlik proposed openstack/ci-log-processing master: Add url subpath for Logsender to reach OpenSearch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ci-log-processing/+/926717 | 09:31 |
frickler | gboutry: iiuc it is not even a mirror, but only a caching proxy. you could propose a patch to add additional proxy settings if needed | 09:32 |
gboutry | Which repo contains the tasks to deploy this caching proxy? Would like to see how it's setup | 09:35 |
frickler | gboutry: this should have most of the config https://opendev.org/opendev/system-config/src/branch/master/playbooks/roles/mirror/templates/mirror.vhost.j2 | 09:40 |
gboutry | frickler: thank you very much, I can see a quay registry mirror, but not variable like docker_mirror to expose it, are we supposed to construct this value in our own ansible tasks? | 09:45 |
gboutry | (just trying to determine a pattern) | 09:46 |
frickler | I'm not sure currently how this is meant to be set up for CI jobs | 09:52 |
fungi | gboutry: it's possible the quay proxy never worked fully and the people trying to get it going lost interest in continuing to troubleshoot it, i don't recall exactly... i think it was started by contributors who were working on tripleo, if that gives any sense of the timeframe | 10:55 |
fungi | from git history, it looks like cloudnull first added it in 2019 ( https://review.opendev.org/683240 ) and then aschultz extended it in 2020/2021 ( https://review.opendev.org/744038 ) to handle a change in redirects | 11:00 |
fungi | so maybe it worked initially, or maybe it's still working but tripleo jobs did something special to access it | 11:02 |
fungi | gboutry: looks like kolla uses it by hard-coding the port number: https://opendev.org/openstack/kolla-ansible/src/branch/master/tests/templates/globals-default.j2#L82-L88 | 11:06 |
gboutry | thank you very much for these precisions | 11:06 |
opendevreview | daniel.pawlik proposed openstack/ci-log-processing master: Add url subpath for Logsender to reach OpenSearch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ci-log-processing/+/926717 | 11:20 |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 14:23 | |
gboutry | How can I find how ubuntu-jammy vms are configured? I'm currently facing an issue that could be caused by CGroup configuration, and I would like to check that | 14:36 |
fungi | gboutry: you could adjust your job to collect the files that configure that or run some additional command to echo the information you're looking for. you can also download the images we use if you want to boot one yourself | 14:54 |
fungi | we also publish the diskimage-builder logs for them, if that helps, and you can inspect the dib elements | 14:55 |
fungi | gboutry: you can find samples of our current qcow2 images here: https://nb01.opendev.org/images/ | 15:01 |
fungi | also the dib logs are here: https://nb01.opendev.org/ | 15:02 |
opendevreview | James Page proposed openstack/project-config master: Retire the mistral charm repository https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926791 | 15:09 |
clarkb | we don't do anything special to jammy cgroups though. And yes they don't play nice with podman by default iirc | 15:12 |
clarkb | you have to tell podman to use the old cgroups system or something. | 15:13 |
clarkb | but we're about to switch the default node type to noble and I think things are better there | 15:13 |
gboutry | Thanks for the info | 15:14 |
gboutry | I might try with noble nodeset | 15:14 |
fungi | which has happened literally just now | 15:26 |
fungi | the default nodeset change that is | 15:27 |
gboutry | Well, noble solved my problems :) | 15:31 |
rosmaita | i have a general question about the gerrit interface, hoping someone has a suggestion | 15:36 |
rosmaita | when the labels with functions got migrated to submit-requirements, | 15:36 |
rosmaita | the Review-Priority field for cinder became kind of useless for us | 15:36 |
rosmaita | what i mean is, if you look at this list of reviews, | 15:36 |
rosmaita | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/os-brick+branch:master | 15:36 |
rosmaita | they all have a green checkmark in the "RP" column | 15:36 |
rosmaita | and setting the Review-Priority to +2, as on | 15:36 |
rosmaita | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/926293 | 15:36 |
rosmaita | doesn't affect what shows up in the "RP" column | 15:36 |
rosmaita | what we want is the +1 and +2 reviews to really stand out from the rest | 15:36 |
rosmaita | jeremy suggested that maybe we could use hashtags | 15:36 |
rosmaita | though we would want to restrict who could assign them, | 15:36 |
rosmaita | and that might be bad if other projects use hashtags for unrestricted purposes | 15:36 |
rosmaita | anyway, i'm hoping someone might have an idea or knows of a project | 15:36 |
rosmaita | that's been able to do this successfully | 15:36 |
fungi | gboutry: oh! i wonder if you were rediscovering https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpod/+bug/2024394 | 15:37 |
fungi | that did indeed cause us issues in places too | 15:37 |
clarkb | rosmaita: the issue on the change list screen is that it is showing you whether or not merge requirements have been satisfied. Since review-priority doesn't prevent merging it is satisfied by default. You can change that by requiring review-priority to be set for merging which is likely annoying for other reasons | 15:38 |
gboutry | fungi: I don't think so, I think it fail at creating the root cgroup, it was failing while trying to bootstrap a single k8s | 15:38 |
clarkb | re hashtags, yes I think we'd like to open those up for all projects to all registered users by default | 15:38 |
clarkb | rosmaita: I think my suggestion would be to use hashtags and talk to people who abuse them. Or use a dashboard that filters by review-priority vote values | 15:39 |
gboutry | kubelet exited with: failed to initialize top level QOS containers: root container [kubepods] doesn't exist # which, after research, I found happens when there's issue between cgroupv1 and v2 | 15:40 |
clarkb | gboutry: yes, that affect jammy out of the box aiui. And it breaks podman too | 15:40 |
fungi | rosmaita: i think the way the release team dealt with that for their ptl-approved column was to make it a required vote, but also it really only has two possible values (0..+1) | 15:40 |
gboutry | maybe the cloud image I used locally was cgroupv2 only, hence why it did not have issues | 15:41 |
rosmaita | clarkb: is there any way to tie the Review-Priority field to the Workflow, such that if someone +W a patch, the review priority would also be satisfied? | 15:41 |
clarkb | rosmaita: maybe? the language for submit requirements is fairly expressive but I'm not sure if there is a way to refer to other votes on the same change | 15:41 |
rosmaita | ok, i will dig into the docs a bit | 15:42 |
gboutry | fungi: I think I heard in the past there were talk about increasing the default vm size from 8gb to 16gb, is there news? | 15:43 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Update update-constraints job and script https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926405 | 15:44 |
clarkb | rosmaita: looking at the docs I think gerrit infers whether or not a submit-requirement is related to a label if the label is used in hte submit requirement rule. Which would make a rule like that associate to code-review and not review-priority I think. Still may be worth trying | 15:45 |
rosmaita | clarkb: thanks | 15:46 |
fungi | gboutry: we have node labels for higher ram flavors in some clouds if specific jobs need those (though their availability is limited to a subset of our providers so they may have allocation problems when there are outages), but no i don't think the default is likely to change soon | 15:48 |
clarkb | rosmaita: also I think if you remove the submit-requirement then that column goes away on the change list (it only shows labels required for merging) | 15:53 |
rosmaita | arrrrrgh | 15:55 |
fungi | but it can still be queried | 15:55 |
clarkb | essentially that functionality in gerrit is geared towards showing you what you need to do to merge | 15:55 |
clarkb | it isn't there to prioritize things or sort them | 15:55 |
fungi | so you can have a dashboard which lists your rp+2 changes, your rp+1 changes, etc | 15:55 |
clarkb | fungi: yup thats why I suggested a dashboard | 15:55 |
fungi | i'll note that the lack of flexibility around this sort of thing (though it has gotten better over the years) is a big part of why the reviewday interface used to exist | 15:57 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Use yaml.safe_load in release jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926821 | 16:37 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Bump the version of hacking to latest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926825 | 17:02 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Omnibus fixes for running jobs on Noble with Python3.12 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926825 | 17:17 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Omnibus fixes for running jobs on Noble with Python3.12 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926825 | 17:31 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Omnibus fixes for running jobs on Noble with Python3.12 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926825 | 17:40 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Omnibus fixes for running jobs on Noble with Python3.12 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926825 | 18:03 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Omnibus fixes for running jobs on Noble with Python3.12 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926825 | 18:19 |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 18:30 | |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Omnibus fixes for running jobs on Noble with Python3.12 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926825 | 18:30 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Omnibus fixes for running jobs on Noble with Python3.12 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926825 | 18:42 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Omnibus fixes for running jobs on Noble with Python3.12 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926825 | 18:53 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Run openstack-zuul-jobs-linters on Jammy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926843 | 18:53 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Run openstack-zuul-jobs-linters on Jammy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926843 | 18:55 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Use yaml.safe_load in release jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926821 | 19:24 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Run ansible-lint on Ubuntu Noble https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926848 | 19:26 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Omnibus fixes for running jobs on Noble with Python3.12 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926825 | 19:39 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Use yaml.safe_load in release jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926821 | 19:42 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Run ansible-lint on Ubuntu Noble https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926848 | 19:50 |
opendevreview | Clark Boylan proposed openstack/project-config master: Run ansible-lint on Ubuntu Noble https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/926848 | 19:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!