stevebaker[m] | arne_wiebalck, holtgrewe : The SIG video is live, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yJvXFOqzSI | 01:49 |
---|---|---|
stevebaker[m] | This time I actually processed the audio, so its cleaned up a bit with EQ, gating, compression | 01:50 |
rpittau | good morning ironic! o/ | 05:19 |
rpittau | admiyo: I think I see what your problem is, if you're using recent werkzeug version (>=2.1) in your ipa ramdisk, it removed deprecated mixins, including json https://github.com/pallets/werkzeug/commit/7b52ecd8f3a67e19df32467a832761f4f0d97c8b | 05:21 |
rpittau | our bifrost debian CI jobs are also failing because of that | 05:21 |
rpittau | so we actually need to adapt the ipa code | 05:22 |
rpittau | I blame the new upper-constraints :) | 05:27 |
janders | hey rpittau o/ good morning | 05:30 |
rpittau | hey janders :) | 05:30 |
rpittau | breakfast, bbl | 05:31 |
opendevreview | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/ironic-python-agent master: [WIP] Use Werkzeug modern version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-python-agent/+/837661 | 06:00 |
arne_wiebalck | Good morning janders rpittau and Ironic! | 06:36 |
rpittau | hey arne_wiebalck :) | 07:05 |
rpittau | git is still broken in CI ? | 07:17 |
rpittau | context -> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028160.html | 07:19 |
dtantsur | good morning folks! looking for a 2nd +2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/837379 | 07:22 |
opendevreview | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/ironic master: [WIP] Decouple deploy callback timeout from deploy step timeout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/837690 | 07:33 |
waleedm_ | Hi, guys, Is there a way to list all interfaces for node using, openstack baremetal port list ? | 07:48 |
opendevreview | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/ironic-python-agent master: [WIP] Use Werkzeug modern version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-python-agent/+/837661 | 08:17 |
dtantsur | waleedm_: the port listing command lists all NICs *known to ironic*. if you use inspection, it may be all NICs. | 08:24 |
Nisha_ | zer0c00l, hi | 08:24 |
Nisha_ | dtantsur, hi | 08:24 |
dtantsur | o/ | 08:25 |
Nisha_ | dtantsur, do u have any idea of the timezone we can catch hold of zer0c00l or rloo for clarification on anaconda based deploy? | 08:25 |
dtantsur | Nisha_: I think Ruby is in Canada East, and zer0c00l is in US west. Maybe write them an email? you can find the addresses in gerrit. | 08:26 |
dtantsur | unfortunately, TheJulia seems out this week, otherwise you could ask her as well | 08:26 |
Nisha_ | dtantsur, ohk. I didnt know TheJulia is also aware of anaconda based deployment thing....Ok let me write an email to them and check if they can suggest the way... | 08:27 |
Nisha_ | dtantsur, thank you :) | 08:27 |
dtantsur | Nisha_: I assume you did check that the image a6135e20-fdb0-4edb-88db-c9fb9898f921 exists and is public? | 08:28 |
Nisha_ | dtantsur, yes its a working image and freshly uploaded to glance. Earlier we assumed that the connection to glance is not working so we tried another node with another image with deploy interface as "direct" and there node validate works fine | 08:29 |
Nisha_ | so glance connectivity is fine and the image for anaconda deploy is created the way it is documented | 08:29 |
dtantsur | Nisha_: are you using the very recent Ironic? I think there has been some large fixes not so long ago. | 08:30 |
Nisha_ | but as soon as the deploy interface is chnaged to anaconda, we get this error | 08:30 |
Nisha_ | yes ironic is recent one, i guess around 2-3 weeks old | 08:30 |
Nisha_ | ramdisk is around 1 month older | 08:31 |
Nisha_ | dtantsur, so these fixes were in ironic or in IPA? | 08:31 |
dtantsur | in Ironic | 08:32 |
dtantsur | I don't think IPA is involved in the anaconda deploy at all | 08:32 |
Nisha_ | Ok let me try pulling latest ironic and see | 08:32 |
Nisha_ | IPA not required for loading/trigerring kickstart based deploy? | 08:33 |
Nisha_ | means we dont need to populate deploy_ramdisk and deploy_kernel? | 08:33 |
Nisha_ | just asking as per above statement :) | 08:33 |
dtantsur | I guess so? I'm not really familiar with the anaconda deploy beyond some basic facts | 08:34 |
Nisha_ | ok. Let me first try pulling latest ironic and see if it goes through. if not, then i will shoot out the mail to Ruby, zer0c00l and TheJulia | 08:34 |
Nisha_ | dtantsur, thanks for the help :) atleast i know even ironic may need further update :) | 08:35 |
opendevreview | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/ironic-python-agent master: [WIP] Use Werkzeug modern version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-python-agent/+/837661 | 08:36 |
dmellado | morning ironic folks ;) | 09:05 |
rpittau | hey dmellado :) | 09:06 |
dmellado | let's see how the day goes on. My kid was forbidding me to do any work this morning xD | 09:06 |
dmellado | no, daddy, you're not going to work. you'll be playing with me xD | 09:07 |
rpittau | so ironic-lib CI is also broken \o/ | 09:09 |
rpittau | it does look like a recent thing, right after the branch cut | 09:10 |
dmellado | oh, awesome | 09:10 |
dmellado | xD | 09:10 |
rpittau | yeah, this week is not particularly good for CI | 09:10 |
rpittau | or last week | 09:10 |
rpittau | or any week | 09:11 |
dmellado | I was going to say any weeek lol | 09:11 |
dmellado | something always happens | 09:11 |
dmellado | but I don't want to mention the devil (aka prow...) | 09:12 |
rpittau | we're running both test_baremetal_server_ops_partition_image and test_baremetal_server_ops_wholedisk_image in both partition and wholedisk jobs, quite puzzled by that | 09:12 |
dmellado | do you run anything on real baremetal? or it's all sushy-tools | 09:13 |
dmellado | jusst wondering | 09:13 |
rpittau | dmellado: I have experience with prow on Openshift side of things, not a huge fan :/ | 09:13 |
dmellado | xD | 09:13 |
dmellado | damn keyboard.... | 09:13 |
dtantsur | rpittau: there are no more separate partition and whole disk jobs | 09:15 |
dtantsur | we just haven't renamed them properly... | 09:15 |
dtantsur | the actual difference is probably around netboot vs local boot | 09:16 |
dtantsur | dmellado: all our CI is virtual | 09:16 |
dtantsur | well, okay, we also have bare metal 3rd party CI | 09:16 |
rpittau | ah right | 09:16 |
dmellado | I can just say that I'm missing zuul/gerrit a LOT | 09:17 |
dmellado | dammit | 09:17 |
dmellado | xD | 09:17 |
rpittau | I'm cehcking the config in ironic-lib, I do see IRONIC_TEMPEST_WHOLE_DISK_IMAGE True or False in the two jobs | 09:17 |
dtantsur | that's quite a mess, yes | 09:17 |
rpittau | but yeah, I remember now | 09:17 |
dtantsur | we need to make sure we don't run local boot + partition image + BIOS | 09:18 |
* dtantsur brb | 09:18 | |
rpittau | yeah, the local one seems failing | 09:18 |
rpittau | no, gosh, it's the netboot one | 09:19 |
opendevreview | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/ironic-lib master: [WIP] Update jobs names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-lib/+/837705 | 09:26 |
rpittau | so now we just need a fix for the git issue | 09:28 |
dmellado | what's going on with git? CI not cloning or smthing? | 09:33 |
rpittau | dmellado: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028160.html | 09:37 |
dmellado | pbr to be | 09:37 |
dmellado | unable to access the package metadata | 09:37 |
dmellado | awweeesome xD | 09:38 |
opendevreview | Ebbex proposed openstack/bifrost master: Simplify bifrost-ironic-install required_defaults https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/837234 | 10:39 |
opendevreview | Ebbex proposed openstack/bifrost master: Allow for almalinux and rocky installations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/837235 | 10:39 |
iurygregory | good morning Ironic | 11:20 |
janders | hey iurygregory o/ | 11:25 |
opendevreview | Ebbex proposed openstack/bifrost master: Allow for almalinux and rocky installations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/837235 | 11:42 |
iurygregory | hey janders | 11:44 |
opendevreview | Ebbex proposed openstack/bifrost master: Allow for almalinux and rocky installations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/bifrost/+/837235 | 11:44 |
janders | see you tomorrow Ironic o/ | 12:00 |
rpittau | bye everyone, see you on Tuesday! o/ | 15:53 |
ayoung | What is the expected approach to DNS in a bifrost deploy? It was working, then I did a redeploy, and now when I pxe boot, I get the error message that translates to no DNS servers avaialble. I don't see an entry for them in the dnsmasq.conf on the controller | 17:34 |
iurygregory | ayoung, not sure if helps https://docs.openstack.org/bifrost/latest/user/dhcp.html | 17:39 |
rpioso | iurygregory: It would helpful to also get TheJulia's perspective on maintaining stable/train when she returns. Thank you! | 19:56 |
stevebaker[m] | good morning | 22:24 |
iurygregory | dansmith, hey o/ not sure if you are still working or already sleeping, I've pushed an initial patch to ironic with the grenade skip level https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/836966 I've added some questions on it, when you have some time please take a look o/ | 23:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!