| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-karbor | 00:14 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:05 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-karbor | 01:47 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 03:49 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-karbor | 04:43 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 04:48 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-karbor | 04:53 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 04:58 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-karbor | 05:57 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 06:01 | |
| *** Guest2892 has joined #openstack-karbor | 06:53 | |
| *** gouthamr has quit IRC | 06:56 | |
| *** yuval has joined #openstack-karbor | 07:03 | |
| *** Guest2892 has quit IRC | 07:19 | |
| *** chenying__ has quit IRC | 07:20 | |
| *** chenying__ has joined #openstack-karbor | 07:21 | |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has joined #openstack-karbor | 08:00 | |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has left #openstack-karbor | 08:01 | |
| *** chenying__ has quit IRC | 08:49 | |
| *** chenying__ has joined #openstack-karbor | 08:49 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-karbor | 09:15 | |
| *** zhonghua has quit IRC | 09:39 | |
| *** zhonghua has joined #openstack-karbor | 09:40 | |
| *** buttlike has joined #openstack-karbor | 11:22 | |
| buttlike | hello losers | 11:22 |
|---|---|---|
| buttlike | yu ugly vomiyt staine | 11:23 |
| buttlike | shut up n fu | 11:23 |
| *** buttlike has quit IRC | 11:33 | |
| *** wujiajun has quit IRC | 11:39 | |
| *** wujiajun has joined #openstack-karbor | 11:39 | |
| *** zhangshuai has quit IRC | 12:53 | |
| *** zhangshuai has joined #openstack-karbor | 12:53 | |
| chenying | ping yuval yuvalb | 13:17 |
| yuval | hey chenying | 13:17 |
| chenying | yuval https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432371/ | 13:39 |
| chenying | Update fullstack efficiency This patch has optimized the execution time of fullstack. So IMO, it could be included in stable/ocata branch of karbor. What's your oppion about it ? | 13:39 |
| yuval | chenying: it affects only the tests, not that important for the release | 13:39 |
| chenying | yuval: But the execution time of fullstack is too long. Maybe it is a question for the user who will deploy the ocata version of karbor. | 13:43 |
| yuval | chenying: fullstack tests are not for users of karbor | 13:45 |
| chenying | yuval: No I mean that the service provider (user) who deploy the ocata version of karbor, also need run the fullstack to check the capability of karbor. | 13:47 |
| chenying | in their local environment, not run in the gate. | 13:47 |
| yuval | chenying: the fullstack tests are not used to test karbor capabilities | 13:54 |
| yuval | chenying: they are not used to benchmark | 13:54 |
| yuval | chenying: their sole purpose is to test patches before delivery | 13:55 |
| chenying | yuval not test karbor capabilities. ok Just to test whether karbor servie is ok. | 13:56 |
| yuval | chenying: currently that patch actually fails the CI | 13:57 |
| yuval | chenying: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432371/ | 13:57 |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has joined #openstack-karbor | 13:57 | |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has left #openstack-karbor | 13:57 | |
| chenying | yuval : I will check. | 14:10 |
| chenying | yuval: Could you help review these two patches? Add metadata parameter to checkpoint API https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352748/ Support clients with privileged user in karbor https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425510/ | 14:30 |
| yuval | chenying: why do we need services with admin privileges? | 14:37 |
| yuval | priviliges* | 14:38 |
| chenying | yuval: As I talk in the commit messages, some verdors have a requirement that Nova client with admin authority to call the | 14:46 |
| chenying | RESTAPI about hypervisor. | 14:46 |
| yuval | chenying: I read your commit message, still don't understand. Why cinder needs to act on volumes from a different tenant? Which REST APIs does nova need that require admin priviligies? | 14:47 |
| chenying | yuval: They may not used in our default plugins of karbor. | 14:48 |
| yuval | chenying: I understand, but I'm trying to get what the use case is | 14:48 |
| yuval | chenying: giving admin priviliges is not something that should be given without thought | 14:49 |
| chenying | Why cinder needs to act on volumes from a different tenant? --- This is not need now, the workflow of plugins now have been rebased. In the early plugins, we need save the content of tenent to query the stats. | 14:49 |
| yuval | chenying: and why can't this be don't without admin priviliges? | 14:50 |
| chenying | chenying: and why can't this be don't without admin priviliges? ----- you mean this use case?: Nova client with admin authority to call the RESTAPI about hypervisor. | 14:52 |
| yuval | chenying: which REST API requires admin priviliges? | 14:52 |
| chenying | yuval:I have mentioned that nova RESTAPI about hypervisor. | 14:58 |
| chenying | yuval: You can see this: http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=list-hypervisors-detail | 14:58 |
| chenying | yuval os-hypervisors API. Policy defaults enable only users with the administrative role to perform this operation. | 14:59 |
| yuval | chenying: I see | 15:02 |
| chenying | yuval: By the way, the client(nova) with admin authority aslo has been introduced to cinder. :D | 15:06 |
| yuval | chenying: reference? link? | 15:06 |
| chenying | yuval I have not found the spec or patch, I only found it in the source code of cinder. | 15:07 |
| yuval | ok | 15:07 |
| *** Jeffrey4l_ has quit IRC | 15:30 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l__ has joined #openstack-karbor | 15:30 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l__ has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l__ has joined #openstack-karbor | 15:33 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l__ is now known as Jeffrey4l | 15:33 | |
| *** yuval has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-karbor | 16:16 | |
| *** zhonghua has quit IRC | 19:02 | |
| *** zhonghua has joined #openstack-karbor | 19:03 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l_ has joined #openstack-karbor | 21:35 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 21:35 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-karbor | 22:10 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!