| guesswhat[m] | mnasiadka: aloha, will you merge the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/888496 ? thanks | 07:14 |
|---|---|---|
| mnasiadka | guesswhat[m]: first we need a CI job that will test skyline, and then we can think about merging this - but yes, I'll take care of that | 07:29 |
| guesswhat[m] | thanks, does this release in bobcat? | 07:30 |
| mnasiadka | I doubt that | 07:49 |
| mnasiadka | I have a feeling we broke something with Podman - https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_874/899231/2/check/kolla-ansible-ubuntu-swift/8746988/primary/logs/ansible/reconfigure | 08:58 |
| SvenKieske | I hate python tracebacks so I'm probably reading that wrong, but why does kolla_docker.py seem to call kolla_podman_worker.py here? shouldn't that be now kolla_container_worker.py calls kolla_podman_worker.py? | 09:02 |
| frickler | some docker_common_options options missing I'd say | 09:08 |
| frickler | in combination with a location that defaults to podman instead of docker | 09:08 |
| mnasiadka | interesting that it only fails on reconfgiure | 09:11 |
| mnasiadka | reconfigure | 09:11 |
| SvenKieske | also interesting that this wasn't catched during CI run of the podman merge | 09:15 |
| SvenKieske | ah I see that one is non voting, original change the failure logs are from: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/899231 https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7c7a7a4b4170407f9ad211a0d6a08f22 | 09:17 |
| SvenKieske | weird, in a lot of changes I don't see this kolla-ansible-ubuntu-swift job, checking the CI config.. | 09:23 |
| mnasiadka | but that doesn't change the fact that would be nice to get https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/899231 merged - bbezak frickler kevko ;-) | 09:48 |
| frickler | mnasiadka: lots of rocky things failing there | 10:19 |
| mnasiadka | frickler: ironic has been failing always, which is weird because I can't reproduce it | 10:20 |
| mnasiadka | masakari... I have no clue ;) | 10:20 |
| frickler | masakari and swift fail on ubuntu, too, so likely unrelated. I don't know anything about how the new repo is good or bad though, so not sure whether I should +2 | 10:26 |
| mnasiadka | frickler: it's basically the same - we used trunk.rdoproject.org, which after a release publishes to centos stream mirror | 11:05 |
| opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kayobe master failed: Remove unsupported kolla_docker_registry_insecure variable https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/898091 | 11:12 |
| mnasiadka | frickler: it seems the cephadm job is fantastically failing with conversions | 11:39 |
| mnasiadka | 2023-10-26 08:51:33.945 29 ERROR oslo_messaging.rpc.server cinder.exception.ImageTooBig: Image ef6abcc0-cf13-4d15-8bfa-d024f3e3eeca size exceeded available disk space: There is no space on /var/lib/cinder/conversion to convert image. Requested: 1073741824, available: 669487104. | 11:39 |
| mnasiadka | why are we even doing conversions? | 11:40 |
| mnasiadka | test_volume_from_image_from_volume - that is some crazy stuff | 11:41 |
| mnasiadka | but we should have 1G of space :) | 11:42 |
| mnasiadka | /dev/xvda1 37G 35G 478M 99% / | 11:42 |
| mnasiadka | or maybe not | 11:42 |
| kevko | morning | 11:42 |
| mnasiadka | nearly each image is over 1GB? that's fantastic | 11:45 |
| kevko | :D | 11:46 |
| mnasiadka | ok then, it seems RDO did something crazy | 11:49 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: done | 11:49 |
| mnasiadka | hmm, actually not - but I'll have a look later | 11:52 |
| kevko | replied | 11:53 |
| SvenKieske | well 1GB is not very large, is it? | 11:55 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kayobe master: CI: Drop tox-py38 job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/899399 | 13:17 |
| mnasiadka | SvenKieske: if we have 478M free then it is :D | 13:25 |
| SvenKieske | well I'd encourage to get more space rather than trying to reduce usage :P | 13:34 |
| mnasiadka | well, this is sort of the standard, some nodepool providers add a second disk we use for Docker I think | 13:35 |
| mnasiadka | But maybe we don't use it in Kolla-Ansible, just Kolla | 13:35 |
| mnasiadka | Will have a look later | 13:36 |
| SvenKieske | 37G for root doesn't look that much, just recently saw a prod cluster with almost 100G of images.. | 13:37 |
| SvenKieske | and that was a small one | 13:37 |
| mnasiadka | https://github.com/openstack/kolla/blob/80a16bfc6ef2694bbaa490c30ab9bc1e29e35825/tests/playbooks/pre.yml#L21 - that's what we do in Kolla | 13:40 |
| mnasiadka | so it seems we need to apply the same in Kolla-Ansible | 13:40 |
| *** will is now known as jovial | 14:27 | |
| kevko | mnasiadka: why we are installing rabbitmq from bullseye repo in bookworm images ? | 14:58 |
| mnasiadka | kevko: because bookworm has way older erlang, and we did that in the past | 14:58 |
| mnasiadka | to have the same erlang version on all distributions | 14:58 |
| mnasiadka | everything is in Gerrit | 15:00 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: i am asking regarding rabbitmq not erlang | 15:07 |
| mnasiadka | kevko: the same | 15:07 |
| mnasiadka | let me find the patch | 15:08 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: bookworm has installed erlang from official debian repo ...and then rabbitmq is installed from bullseye ...i don't think it's o | 15:09 |
| kevko | ok | 15:09 |
| kevko | and it's 25 | 15:09 |
| mnasiadka | you mean in master? | 15:09 |
| mnasiadka | ah | 15:10 |
| mnasiadka | I thought https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/896912 is merged | 15:10 |
| mnasiadka | so - show me where we're installing rabbitmq from bullseye | 15:11 |
| mnasiadka | well, actually we are | 15:12 |
| mnasiadka | rabbitmq is noarch, so probably it works, but it should be fixed | 15:12 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: checking now to have bigger picture | 15:13 |
| mnasiadka | kevko: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/896616/12/kolla/template/repos.yaml | 15:17 |
| mnasiadka | look at your comment ;) | 15:17 |
| mnasiadka | because the table on RMQ page says use bullseye on bookworm | 15:17 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: well, as you can see ..i forgot and now asking :D | 15:26 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: it's possible that in that time bullseye didn't exist ...if i remember correctly but now it works | 15:26 |
| mnasiadka | kevko: while we're at it - happy to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/896912? | 15:37 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe master: Remove disable-selinux from default DIB elements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/897866 | 15:38 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: agree | 15:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe master: Fix Launchpad bug URL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/898961 | 15:38 |
| mnasiadka | kevko: I'll followup with that link in repos.yaml so we don't forget why we use bullseye | 15:39 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe master: Add custom user_data content configuration for Bifrost https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/879554 | 15:52 |
| opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla master: Switch all sw components from bullseye to bookworm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/899414 | 16:13 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: i've already submitted change bullseye-> bookworm as now bookworm exist | 16:14 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: hmm, but actually they are still saying just "use bullseye for bookworm" | 16:15 |
| mnasiadka | yeah | 16:15 |
| mnasiadka | but if that passes, we can stick to that for now I guess | 16:16 |
| kevko | Not all distributions are covered (indexed). For example, freshly released ones usually won't be recognized by the package hosting services. But there are good news: since the package indexed for these distributions is the same, any reasonably recent distribution name would suffice in practice. For example, users of Debian Sid or Debian Bullseye | 16:17 |
| kevko | can both use bullseye for distribution name. | 16:17 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: i think it was info for a time when bookworm was relesed ? | 16:17 |
| mnasiadka | maybe | 16:24 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla master: debian: use erlang and mariadb from respective repos https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/896912 | 17:17 |
| opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla master: Switch all sw components from bullseye to bookworm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/899414 | 17:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe master: Remove unsupported kolla_docker_registry_insecure variable https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/898091 | 18:48 |
| opendevreview | Maksim Malchuk proposed openstack/kayobe stable/2023.1: Add custom user_data content configuration for Bifrost https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/899329 | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!