*** parallax is now known as Guest347 | 02:48 | |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Enhanced explanation of volume handling with podman https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922717 | 05:57 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump Ansible versions to 2.16 and 2.17 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921743 | 06:11 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump Ansible versions to 2.16 and 2.17 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921743 | 06:12 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Drop OpenEuler host OS support (due to no python3.10+) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923355 | 06:26 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump Ansible versions to 2.16 and 2.17 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921743 | 06:28 |
tafkamax | <kevko> "Taavi Ansper: It's not documente..." <- Interesting the docs point out you need to supply rndc key and conf that aligns with the other DNS server, but DDNS has different keys ? https://askubuntu.com/questions/1486740/using-of-ddns-confgen-versus-rndc-confgen | 07:07 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla master: Add rally images for testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/922892 | 08:04 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add rally role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922900 | 08:11 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE to kolla-toolbox container https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923105 | 08:11 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Try to test via rally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922901 | 08:11 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add rally role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922900 | 08:28 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE to kolla-toolbox container https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923105 | 08:28 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Try to test via rally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922901 | 08:28 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bullseye removal followup - remove from prechecks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923364 | 08:49 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump Ansible versions to 2.16 and 2.17 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921743 | 09:03 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add rally role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922900 | 09:23 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE to kolla-toolbox container https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923105 | 09:23 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Try to test via rally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922901 | 09:23 |
opendevreview | Rafal Lewandowski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [WIP] Enable ML2/OVN and distributed FIP by default. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/904959 | 09:48 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add rally role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922900 | 11:01 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE to kolla-toolbox container https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923105 | 11:01 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Try to test via rally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922901 | 11:01 |
*** thuvh1 is now known as thuvh | 11:02 | |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla master: Add rally images for testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/922892 | 11:23 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add rally role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922900 | 11:26 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE to kolla-toolbox container https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923105 | 11:26 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Try to test via rally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922901 | 11:26 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla master: Add rally images for testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/922892 | 12:31 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [CI] Force config drive for ipv6 jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914185 | 12:32 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [CI] Trust kolla generated CA cert https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922559 | 12:32 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [CI] Fix swift disk preparation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/913942 | 12:32 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [CI] Make demo router and network shared https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922899 | 12:32 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add rally role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922900 | 12:32 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE to kolla-toolbox container https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923105 | 12:32 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Try to test via rally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922901 | 12:32 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump Ansible versions to 2.16 and 2.17 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921743 | 12:47 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: systemd: Add kolla.target https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922420 | 12:49 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: systemd: Add kolla.target https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922420 | 12:49 |
mnasiadka | mgoddard mnasiadka bbezak frickler kevko SvenKieske mmalchuk gkoper jangutter jsuazo jovial osmanlicilegi mattcrees dougszu darmach - meeting in 10 | 12:50 |
opendevreview | Rafal Lewandowski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [WIP] Enable ML2/OVN and distributed FIP by default. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/904959 | 13:01 |
mnasiadka | #startmeeting kolla | 13:03 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Jul 3 13:03:36 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 13:03 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 13:03 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' | 13:03 |
mnasiadka | #topic rollcall | 13:03 |
mnasiadka | o/ | 13:03 |
mmalchuk | щ/ | 13:03 |
jovial | o/ | 13:03 |
mmalchuk | щ/ | 13:03 |
mmalchuk | o/ | 13:03 |
mhiner | o/ | 13:03 |
r-krcek | \0/ | 13:03 |
frickler | \o | 13:04 |
ihalomi | \o | 13:04 |
mnasiadka | #topic agenda | 13:05 |
mnasiadka | * CI status | 13:05 |
mnasiadka | * Release tasks | 13:05 |
mnasiadka | * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) | 13:05 |
mnasiadka | * Current cycle planning | 13:05 |
mnasiadka | * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 13:05 |
mnasiadka | * Open discussion | 13:05 |
mnasiadka | #topic CI status | 13:05 |
mnasiadka | overall green, unless I stopped understanding colors ;-) | 13:06 |
mnasiadka | debian-aarch64 kolla periodics failed, but I guess that's something temporary | 13:07 |
mnasiadka | #topic Release tasks | 13:07 |
mnasiadka | none for this week | 13:07 |
mnasiadka | #topic Current cycle planning | 13:07 |
frickler | what about stable releases? | 13:08 |
mnasiadka | I've re-started work on bumping Ansible | 13:08 |
mnasiadka | Ah, stable releases - sorry | 13:08 |
mnasiadka | #topic Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) | 13:08 |
mnasiadka | Any volunteer to raise patches for stable releases? | 13:08 |
mnasiadka | (it's been a while since we had those) | 13:08 |
frickler | I can propose a patch unless someone wants to up their stats | 13:08 |
mnasiadka | well, it would be good it's not you - because then it's awkward if you +2 the releases patch | 13:10 |
mnasiadka | and it seems the release team numbers are not so great ;-) | 13:10 |
frickler | I don't mind doing awkward things ;) but feel free to propose the patch yourself | 13:11 |
mnasiadka | yeah, seems like it | 13:11 |
mnasiadka | I'll do it | 13:11 |
mmalchuk | frickler show me a patch I'll push it ;) to save from awkward things ;) | 13:11 |
mnasiadka | #topic Current cycle planning (again) | 13:11 |
frickler | there is some doc on how to do it | 13:12 |
mnasiadka | mmalchuk: it's in kolla release docs | 13:12 |
mnasiadka | So, continuing | 13:12 |
mmalchuk | if no hurry will do tomorow or at night | 13:12 |
mnasiadka | ansible-core 2.16 (and 2.17) require controller to be python3.10+ | 13:12 |
mnasiadka | so we need to drop OpenEuler | 13:12 |
frickler | mmalchuk: https://docs.openstack.org/kolla/latest/contributor/release-management.html#maintained (needs an update in the active stable branches list) | 13:13 |
mnasiadka | we need to use python3.12 in Rocky 9 CI (only on the ansible controller) | 13:13 |
mmalchuk | finally) | 13:13 |
mnasiadka | so we'll also need to document this | 13:13 |
mmalchuk | frickler thnaks | 13:13 |
mmalchuk | *thanks | 13:13 |
mnasiadka | I'm working on getting the patch green - currently some hashicorp vault stuff is failing and zun | 13:13 |
frickler | but >= py3.10 should still be fine? | 13:13 |
mnasiadka | yes, Debian and Ubuntu is fine | 13:13 |
mnasiadka | and RHEL9 (so Rocky 9) has rpm packages for python3.12 | 13:14 |
mnasiadka | so we're fine | 13:14 |
mnasiadka | and new Ubuntu will get something like 3.12 or later | 13:14 |
jovial | mnasiadka, Just thinking about the bump in kayobe. Will we have the usual issue with selinux/dnf bindings? | 13:14 |
mnasiadka | jovial: on the host ansible manages you can even have 3.6 | 13:14 |
mnasiadka | so no issues with dnf bindings I guess | 13:15 |
mnasiadka | selinux I mean | 13:15 |
mnasiadka | hopefully | 13:15 |
jovial | But on the control host? | 13:15 |
mnasiadka | we'll see I guess | 13:15 |
jovial | I think we install a few packages | 13:15 |
mnasiadka | then we need to start working on it as well ;) | 13:15 |
jovial | Sounds like a plan | 13:16 |
jovial | I will knock up the kayobe change that depends on your patch :) | 13:18 |
mnasiadka | great, thanks | 13:18 |
mnasiadka | #topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 13:18 |
mnasiadka | (mhiner)[July, 3rd]: Please review(Zuul is now happy): https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/836941 | 13:19 |
mnasiadka | mhiner: there are some unresolved comments - can you fix that? | 13:21 |
mnasiadka | I'll have a look in that patch later today | 13:21 |
mnasiadka | (SvenKieske)[June, 28th] I'd like some reviews and possibly RP+1 on these, please: | 13:22 |
mnasiadka | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/915403 (harden haproxy TLS config) | 13:22 |
mnasiadka | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922840 (add a config validation check to haproxy) | 13:22 |
mnasiadka | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921371 (sec hardening horizon by not mounting host tmp) | 13:22 |
mnasiadka | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/907977 (rmq precheck: also check fanout and reply queues) | 13:22 |
mhiner | mnasiadka: will add some replies, but in the end, Sven has to decide if he is happy with them. | 13:24 |
mnasiadka | mhiner: I mean it's easier for next reviewer if there are resolved comments :) | 13:25 |
mnasiadka | ok, went through Sven's patches, added -1 to each of them ;-) | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | (ihalomi)[3rd July] docker_worker refactor is now passing tests and is ready to review | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/908295 | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | also refactor of container_facts is ready to be reviewed by others | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/911417 | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | simple fix for bug found by kevko: | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923231 | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | ok then, let me have a look | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | first one is big, so RP+1 for later review | 13:27 |
mnasiadka | second one the same | 13:28 |
mnasiadka | and third needs a bug | 13:28 |
mnasiadka | jovial(3rd July) | 13:29 |
mnasiadka | Should we add a kayobe job to kolla CI? | 13:29 |
mnasiadka | Circular dependency so would need to be non-voting (I think) | 13:29 |
mnasiadka | Based on discussion in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/920368 | 13:29 |
mnasiadka | ok then | 13:29 |
mnasiadka | jovial: how long is the job running? is it way longer than the regular aio kolla-ansible jobs? | 13:29 |
mnasiadka | just propose adding something, but I would prefer it's two jobs, not more :) so maybe aio rocky/ubuntu | 13:30 |
jovial | ~ 1h 08m 59s | 13:30 |
mnasiadka | and non-voting for starter | 13:30 |
frickler | are you talking about kolla really or k-a? | 13:31 |
mnasiadka | I think k-a | 13:31 |
ihalomi | mnasiadka: what do you mean it needs a bug? | 13:31 |
jovial | Yeah, I think it would be hard to make it voting as quite often we need a fix in kolla-ansible to get kayobe-ci to work | 13:31 |
mnasiadka | in kolla it doesn't make any sense | 13:31 |
mnasiadka | unless we have kayobe image build jobs, which we probably don't :) | 13:31 |
mnasiadka | jovial: well, it would make us merge things that don't break kayobe e.g. are backwards compatible :) | 13:31 |
jovial | True: might lead to use having to disable to get stuff into k-a occasionally (if its something that is external to k-a that has broken us) | 13:33 |
mnasiadka | ok, so adding two kayobe aio jobs into kolla-ansible - that makes sense | 13:33 |
mnasiadka | regarding frickler's earlier question :) | 13:33 |
jovial | I just wanted to check that it wouldn't get immediately rejected if I proposed something :) | 13:34 |
mnasiadka | we don't immediately reject anything, you can get grilled and asked what are you doing - but not an immediate -2 ;-) | 13:34 |
jovial | For kolla: We do now build the container images: https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_abc/922795/5/check/kayobe-seed-images-rocky9/abcc463/primary/ansible/overcloud-container-image-build | 13:35 |
mnasiadka | Maybe that's a second step, but don't know how would we be able to break kayobe image build :) | 13:35 |
jovial | Just what I was thinking :D | 13:36 |
mnasiadka | ok then, that's it from the whiteboard | 13:36 |
mnasiadka | #topic Open discussion | 13:37 |
mnasiadka | Anybody, anything? | 13:37 |
r-krcek | Hi! I am thinking of moving kolla-asible CLI into python. m.nasiadka recommended to use cliff package - like is used in kayobe-cli or openstack-cli. After reading the docs I noticed that the command structure is different from kolla-ansible. (the commands have subcommands eg. kayobe baremetal compute manage) Would you be more inclined if the new CLI would be are similar to the old one or if it followed the convention used in kayobe-cli and op | 13:37 |
jovial | OK, so I'll try and submit a patch to add the AIO job when I get a bit of time :) | 13:37 |
jovial | How many people use kolla-ansible CLI? | 13:38 |
frickler | r-krcek: seems your message was cut off after "kayobe-cli and op" | 13:38 |
r-krcek | continuation: For example "kolla-ansible bifrost deploy" instead of "kolla-asnible deploy-bifrost" or "kolla-ansible mariadb backup" and "kolla-ansible mariadb recovery" "kolla-ansible containers deploy" and "kolla-ansible containers stop" etc. Plus some features like multiple environments and hooks are marked as experimental. Do you think it is worth it/wanted to also add these features? What do you think? | 13:39 |
jovial | Oh my bad, was thinking of https://opendev.org/openstack/kolla-cli | 13:39 |
mnederlof | doesn´t everyone use the kolla-ansible cli? | 13:39 |
mnederlof | or is it recommended to implement the roles in your own playbooks? | 13:40 |
mnasiadka | Well, from code perspective - I would prefer we have similar code for CLI - so it's easier to maintain as a project | 13:40 |
jovial | mnederlof, Think this was confusion on my part, this is about writing the kolla-ansible bash script in python I guess | 13:40 |
mnasiadka | yes, that's about rewriting bash script to python | 13:41 |
mnasiadka | and if we have something working for Kayobe | 13:41 |
mnasiadka | then for me it's a no brainer task | 13:41 |
mnasiadka | or is it just me? :) | 13:41 |
mnederlof | i am fine with migrating it to python, what comes to mind is that it might be harder to have live output while ansible runs | 13:42 |
mnasiadka | well, we have that working in Kayobe | 13:42 |
mnederlof | awesome | 13:42 |
mnasiadka | so let's not reinvent the whell | 13:42 |
mnasiadka | wheel | 13:42 |
mnasiadka | r-krcek: what do you say? | 13:42 |
mnasiadka | r-krcek: I wouldn't add any features now - just achieve 1:1 feature parity | 13:43 |
jovial | +1 | 13:43 |
mnederlof | as a first release anyway :) | 13:43 |
mnasiadka | but in the past kolla-cli also supported multiple environments (but not in the same way as Kayobe does that today) | 13:43 |
r-krcek | I agree qith m.nasiadka. Lets not reinvent the wheel. :) | 13:43 |
mnederlof | i also have another question, regarding the use of systemd for starting/stopping the docker containers, does anyone know why this was changes? | 13:44 |
mnederlof | *changed | 13:44 |
mnasiadka | because we also support podman | 13:44 |
mnasiadka | and that was the only sensible way | 13:44 |
mnederlof | ah, ok | 13:44 |
r-krcek | Okay, so for now just as close as I can get it to 1:1 with the old interface. Thanks for the input | 13:44 |
mnederlof | we seem to have some issues with systemd, when a container is stopped continuesly (for example a compute node that is restarted, and does not have its compute_id file yet and is still known in the nova database) | 13:45 |
mnasiadka | I think we have a bug around compute_id and managing that properly | 13:46 |
mnasiadka | currently we leave that to Nova | 13:46 |
mnasiadka | and compute_id file gets put in /var/lib/nova | 13:46 |
mnederlof | yes, in the docker volume | 13:46 |
mnasiadka | well, docker volume should be there without any problems | 13:46 |
mnederlof | yes | 13:46 |
mnasiadka | I was thinking that some people put that on NFS - and if that's not mounted or unavailable you can get into issues | 13:47 |
jovial | I guess you could use add a dependency to docker to not start until the storage is mounted for that case? | 13:47 |
mnasiadka | Have you raised a bug and attached some logs? | 13:47 |
mnederlof | the compute_id file is not really the problem though, a restarting container i can fix, but having to reboot the server because systemd is on the fence is kind of annoying (also because the whole system becomes sluggish) | 13:48 |
mnederlof | no not yet, as i am not sure what the trigger is yet | 13:48 |
mnederlof | will do that though | 13:48 |
mnasiadka | well, if we can find the cause for that behaviour - maybe we can fix that | 13:48 |
mnederlof | but was thinking about making systemd optional | 13:48 |
mnasiadka | feel free to raise a bug and leave the link here - so we can have a look | 13:48 |
mnederlof | when using docker | 13:49 |
mnasiadka | well, that's sort of a step back - we haven't observed any issues with systemd approach yet | 13:49 |
mnasiadka | so raise that bug and we can continue in there :) | 13:49 |
mnederlof | yes, will do that :) | 13:49 |
mnasiadka | thanks | 13:50 |
mnasiadka | ok, I think that's it for today | 13:50 |
mnasiadka | Thank you all for coming - see you next week! | 13:50 |
mnasiadka | #endmeeting | 13:50 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Jul 3 13:50:15 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 13:50 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2024/kolla.2024-07-03-13.03.html | 13:50 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2024/kolla.2024-07-03-13.03.txt | 13:50 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2024/kolla.2024-07-03-13.03.log.html | 13:50 |
mmalchuk | mnasiadka thanks | 13:50 |
mmalchuk | cores, please +W : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/921627 | 13:50 |
opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible master failed: Bullseye removal followup - remove from prechecks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923364 | 14:32 |
opendevreview | Matúš Jenča proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add support for RabbitMQ internode tls https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921381 | 14:44 |
opendevreview | Matúš Jenča proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add Redis as caching backend for Heat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/909224 | 14:54 |
opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kayobe master: Support running without root privileges https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/923430 | 15:51 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Drop OpenEuler host OS support (due to no python3.10+) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923355 | 15:55 |
paid4noone | Hey guys, Good day!!! Just wondering what OS should i choose for kolla ansible deployment, considering the future support of kolla and ease of maintenance.. Should i go with rocky linux 9? | 15:58 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe master: Set slightly more accurate name for the manage containers role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/921627 | 15:58 |
paid4noone | Any thoughts.. Pls share. | 15:59 |
opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kayobe master: Support running without root privileges https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/923430 | 16:00 |
opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kayobe master: Support running without root privileges https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/923430 | 16:00 |
jovial | paid4noone, Rocky or Ubuntu are normally good bets. I've got not experience with the other supported distros, so will let others chime in there. | 16:02 |
opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kayobe master: Support running without root privileges https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/923430 | 16:08 |
Lockesmith | I have an aio instance of OpenStack running that I spun up with kolla-ansible. Initially it was using openvswitch, but I switched to ovn last night. Today I'm trying to switch back to openvswitch but I'm having no luck. I've removed all my ovs, ovn, octavia, and neutron containers and configs but I'm still getting the error `msg: ML2/OVN agent detected, neutron_plugin_agent | 16:09 |
Lockesmith | is not set to 'ovn', Kolla-Ansible does not support this migration operation.`. Can this be done? | 16:09 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2024.1: Fix kolla-ansible systemd restart behaviour https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922960 | 16:25 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2023.2: Fix kolla-ansible systemd restart behaviour https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923020 | 16:25 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2023.1: Fix kolla-ansible systemd restart behaviour https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923021 | 16:28 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla master: Add rally images for testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/922892 | 16:37 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Try to test via rally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922901 | 16:38 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add rally role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922900 | 16:49 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE to kolla-toolbox container https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923105 | 16:49 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Try to test via rally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922901 | 16:49 |
opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible master failed: Bullseye removal followup - remove from prechecks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923364 | 16:49 |
opendevreview | scoopex proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Update release notes and module defaults https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923436 | 17:49 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add rally role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922900 | 18:55 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add REQUESTS_CA_BUNDLE to kolla-toolbox container https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/923105 | 18:55 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Try to test via rally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/922901 | 18:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!