| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe master: Fix known_hosts module issue on centos/rocky 10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/954671 | 00:24 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Drop docker_common_options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957228 | 07:07 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Drop docker_common_options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957228 | 07:08 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Drop docker_common_options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957228 | 07:18 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla stable/2025.1: Enable Barbican build on Ubuntu ARM64 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/958020 | 07:22 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla stable/2024.2: Enable Barbican build on Ubuntu ARM64 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/958021 | 07:23 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: fail when systemd unit fails to stop https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/891781 | 07:23 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: fail when systemd unit fails to stop https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/891781 | 07:23 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Drop docker_common_options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957228 | 07:58 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe stable/2025.1: Fix known_hosts module issue on centos/rocky 10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/958026 | 08:12 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: keystone: Add support for using uWSGI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/938395 | 08:15 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: keystone: Add support for using uWSGI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/938395 | 08:16 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: glance: Switch to use uWSGI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/945541 | 08:17 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: glance: Switch to use uWSGI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/945541 | 08:18 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: glance: Switch to use uWSGI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/945541 | 08:18 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: masakari: Add support for using uWSGI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/951115 | 08:19 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: masakari: Add support for using uWSGI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/951115 | 08:19 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: masakari: Add support for using uWSGI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/951115 | 08:21 |
| opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible master failed: loadbalancer: Allow to override proxysql restart_policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957319 | 08:22 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: proxysql: Add support for disabling monitor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/958030 | 08:51 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2024.2: [stable-only] neutron: Followup templating error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957835 | 09:24 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Drop docker_common_options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957228 | 09:28 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Drop docker_common_options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957228 | 09:37 |
| PrzemekK | Anyone got issue with Fail if cell settings not found] "Unable to find settings for the default cell."} looks like regex is broken similar to https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/2120538 | cell0 | 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 | none:/// | 09:52 |
| PrzemekK | on 2025.1 | 09:52 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe stable/2025.1: CI: Move failing job to experimental queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/958042 | 09:56 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe stable/2024.2: CI: Move failing job to experimental queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/958043 | 09:58 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe stable/2024.1: CI: Move failing job to experimental queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/958044 | 09:58 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe stable/2024.1: CI: Move failing job to experimental queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/958044 | 09:59 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe stable/2024.1: CI: Move failing job to experimental queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/958044 | 10:00 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Use 16GB nodes for debian-bookworm nodes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957653 | 10:00 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe stable/2025.1: CI: Move failing job to experimental queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/958042 | 11:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe stable/2024.2: CI: Move failing job to experimental queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/958043 | 11:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe stable/2024.1: CI: Move failing job to experimental queue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/958044 | 11:38 |
| opendevreview | Joachim de Groot proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Implement neutron-ovn-vpn-agent https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/924575 | 11:51 |
| frickler | mnasiadka: looks like octavia is broken since the switch to master, did you look at that already? seems it also needs some uwsgi. other than that, results for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957653 look better to me. or would you prefer to use 16GB only for the upgrade jobs? | 11:54 |
| mnasiadka | I have no clue now, there's also https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/958030 - which might be a solution for single node jobs | 12:25 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe stable/2025.1: Fix known_hosts module issue on centos/rocky 10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/958026 | 12:35 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: octavia: Switch to wsgi module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/958070 | 12:39 |
| mnasiadka | frickler: ^^ that should fix octavia/ovn jobs | 12:41 |
| mnasiadka | mnasiadka bbezak frickler kevko mmalchuk gkoper jovial mattcrees dougszu darmach pabloclsn ravlew amir58118 r-krcek - meeting in 9 minutes | 12:51 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Drop docker_common_options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957228 | 12:52 |
| frickler | mnasiadka: ack, will approve once CI agrees | 12:52 |
| mnasiadka | frickler, bbezak: ^^ dropping docker_common_options is the only way we can really solve that password leaking sec bug - I'm trying to make the changes minimal (because I went very creative in the beginning) so that we can backport it - but it's going to be painful process | 12:53 |
| frickler | I'm still not convinced that it is really a bug, but I didn't look very closely yet, either | 12:55 |
| mnasiadka | #startmeeting kolla | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Aug 20 13:00:26 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' | 13:00 |
| mnasiadka | #topic rollcall | 13:00 |
| mnasiadka | o/ | 13:00 |
| mmalchuk | \o | 13:00 |
| bbezak | o/ | 13:00 |
| amir58118 | \o | 13:00 |
| AlexWelsh[m] | o/ | 13:01 |
| yusufgungor_ | o/ | 13:01 |
| frickler | \o | 13:02 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla stable/2025.1: Enable Barbican build on Ubuntu ARM64 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/958020 | 13:02 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla stable/2024.2: Enable Barbican build on Ubuntu ARM64 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/958021 | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | #topic agenda | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | * CI status | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Release tasks | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Current cycle planning | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Open discussion | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | #topic CI status | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | overall sort of green | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | Octavia removed wsgi script, so we're moving to a file | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/958070 | 13:02 |
| mnasiadka | debian-upgrade jobs fail sometimes, we have lined up two patches - one that bumps debian jobs to 16GB, the other one stops proxysql monitoring on single node jobs (which might overwhelm mariadb a bit on constrained env and then we have problems) | 13:03 |
| mnasiadka | We'll see how these go | 13:03 |
| mnasiadka | Did I miss anything? | 13:04 |
| fungi | the default ansible version in zuul increased this week | 13:04 |
| fungi | (from 9 to 11) | 13:05 |
| mnasiadka | Yeah, I don't think that broke anything on our side | 13:05 |
| fungi | fallout has been fairly minimal for openstack projects, and in your case probably most of the ansible you care about is nested anyway so not affected | 13:05 |
| mnasiadka | thanks for reminding fungi | 13:05 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Release tasks | 13:06 |
| mnasiadka | Let me check the calendar | 13:06 |
| mnasiadka | R-6 | 13:06 |
| bbezak | I think I saw some ironic jobs failing in stable branches, and we've got ubuntu ipv6 in disk full state for some time | 13:06 |
| mnasiadka | R-8: Switch images to current release | 13:06 |
| mnasiadka | we should switch RDO and UCA and Debian OpenStack to some current in-development release | 13:07 |
| mnasiadka | But I think RDO is not going to release Flamingo | 13:07 |
| mnasiadka | Since they switched to do only SLURP | 13:07 |
| mnasiadka | Any volunteer to switch UCA? | 13:07 |
| bbezak | I can take a look | 13:08 |
| bbezak | or will find somebody :) | 13:08 |
| bbezak | can't see flamingo yet here - https://openstack-ci-reports.ubuntu.com/reports/cloud-archive/epoxy_versions.html | 13:09 |
| mnasiadka | Ok well then, let's check again next week | 13:10 |
| bbezak | http://ubuntu-cloud.archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/dists/noble-updates/flamingo/ | 13:10 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Current cycle planning | 13:10 |
| bbezak | ok it seems there is | 13:10 |
| mnasiadka | ok, then, bbezak will do it or find somebody to do it | 13:10 |
| bbezak | are we ok with releases for stable branches? | 13:11 |
| bbezak | (monthly ones0 | 13:11 |
| bbezak | ) | 13:11 |
| mnasiadka | I think we still have the sec bug to fix, and we haven't reverted to latest mariadb on 2025.1 | 13:11 |
| mnasiadka | so not really | 13:11 |
| bbezak | ok | 13:12 |
| mnasiadka | sec bug fix had to be reverted, because it masked too many things, not only that (because we copy things from docker_common_opts) | 13:12 |
| mnasiadka | I think I went with frickler's recommendation and checked my hosts where we run Kayobe (and Kolla-Ansible through that) and a dev VM with Kolla-Ansible - and can't really find that in my syslog | 13:13 |
| mnasiadka | Which might mean we only get that with debug mode enabled | 13:13 |
| mnasiadka | I'll dig through our CI Ansible configs to find the difference | 13:13 |
| mnasiadka | But I still think we should get rid of docker_common_opts since it's not parsed or verified in any sense | 13:13 |
| mnasiadka | And we might find a more nasty bug with that in the future | 13:14 |
| mnasiadka | bbezak, frickler: any comments? | 13:15 |
| bbezak | ideally it would be good not to touch all roles. but if that is not possible then I'm ok with that | 13:16 |
| frickler | I'll take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957228 , but if we only log sensitive data in debug mode, then it should not be considered a security issue | 13:16 |
| mnasiadka | True, at least we would not have to backport that | 13:17 |
| mnasiadka | During looking how complicated is it to do docker_common_options drop I found out kolla_container module has wrong documentation (we claim some things are defaulting to X, but then we default them to Y or empty value) | 13:18 |
| bbezak | backporting such change would be highly suboptimal | 13:18 |
| mnasiadka | And only docker_common_options with correct values in group_vars are safeguarding deployments from a disaster | 13:18 |
| mnasiadka | I tried using module_defaults, but it does not append to roles, we would need to do a block in each role and set the defaults, which is a nightmare | 13:19 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla master: [release] Use Flamingo Ubuntu Cloud Archive https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/958081 | 13:19 |
| mnasiadka | Ok then, let's move on | 13:19 |
| fungi | the commit message starts out with "Due to a security bug..." but the bug is not linked | 13:19 |
| mnasiadka | fungi: yes, that's WIP - I'll update it thoroughly after I get to a state that we do minimal changes needed | 13:20 |
| fungi | okay, just making sure it's related to the one i'm thinking of | 13:20 |
| mnasiadka | Ok, let's go back to contributor survey data | 13:20 |
| mnasiadka | #link https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2025/kolla.2025-07-23-13.00.log.txt | 13:20 |
| mnasiadka | key takeaways are that we don't review things on time, but that's unfortunately obvious with 4 active cores which also happen to be the main people pushing new patches | 13:21 |
| fungi | well, not that you don't review things quickly, but that contributors reported getting that impression | 13:22 |
| mnasiadka | we could try updating the review dashboard with patches that are not older than 2 weeks that are not from these 4 people | 13:22 |
| fungi | often the impression is not backed up by reality, because people are more inclined to remember the one change that sat forever and not the other ten that merged right away | 13:22 |
| mnasiadka | True, but I also have patches that have been never reviewed if I don't remind other core reviewers to have a look :) | 13:23 |
| mnasiadka | So I can't blame people that have that opinion | 13:23 |
| frickler | I have patches on my review list for 2 years, so I agree | 13:24 |
| fungi | one of the things that's been coming up as a commonality across a lot of teams is that infrequent contributors aren't aware of how the team prioritizes development and review activity, and making that more discoverable/obvious could help put things into perspective by setting clearer expectations | 13:24 |
| mnasiadka | We could add the review dashboard links and a link to a place where they can add patches needing review in ether pad - that would make it obvious | 13:24 |
| fungi | as well as making it more apparent how prioritization decisions are made, and how newcomers can get involved in those planning discussions | 13:25 |
| amir58118 | fungi: +1 | 13:25 |
| mnasiadka | Any volunteer to make this docs change? | 13:26 |
| fungi | try to put it somewhere that newer contributors are likely to find, or at least link to it from a place they're going to be referring to for general contribution info | 13:27 |
| mnasiadka | I'd say having that in contributor guide should be enough | 13:27 |
| mnasiadka | #link https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/latest/contributor/index.html | 13:28 |
| fungi | because the other common challenge i've seen in lots of teams is that stuff like this is documented and maybe even kept up to date, but people who aren't deeply involved in the team don't know about the documentation | 13:28 |
| mnasiadka | #link https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/latest/contributor/code-review.html | 13:28 |
| mnasiadka | We even have code review section there | 13:28 |
| fungi | yeah, somewhere like that would make sense | 13:28 |
| bbezak | ok, I can work on that | 13:29 |
| mnasiadka | great | 13:29 |
| mnasiadka | thanks bbezak | 13:29 |
| bbezak | I recently updated some things there, and by quick look I saw some stuff to change too | 13:29 |
| fungi | of course, also try to make sure all maintainers are on the same page when it comes to what's being prioritized and why, though i expect that's likely to be the case already | 13:30 |
| frickler | mostly I'd say we agree on having different priorities | 13:30 |
| mnasiadka | Other thing was simplifying tests, I think we agreed to do that for a couple of cycles now - it's all planned, but since we're a small team - we're rather trying to keep the project afloat and adapt to changes in OpenStack projects - and we don't really have a lot of time to simplify tests. | 13:30 |
| mmalchuk | 'Becoming a core reviewer' didn't work, we didn't get new cores for the last year | 13:31 |
| fungi | which is fine so long as those are reflected in the prioritization info that other contributors see | 13:31 |
| mnasiadka | Well, for core reviewers we have the Review Priority flag, so probably we should document that | 13:31 |
| fungi | mainly try to make sure there's sufficient information discoverable so that when a contributor wants to know why other changes are getting reviewed and not theirs, they have some hope of figuring that out rather than just assuming maintainers are playing favorites | 13:32 |
| fungi | people who have a negative experience are, sadly, quick to jump to conspiratorial explanations rather than applying hanlon's razor | 13:33 |
| mnasiadka | fungi: well, I would sometimes even prefer these people vent in there or on the ML | 13:33 |
| fungi | that's definitely worth documenting too! | 13:34 |
| bbezak | hopefully Matrix could make communication somewhat better | 13:34 |
| fungi | say "and if you think your change is getting overlooked, reach out in <location> to let us know" | 13:34 |
| bbezak | (noting) | 13:34 |
| mnasiadka | hmm, Matrix | 13:35 |
| fungi | yeah, persistence and time zones make this harder for sure | 13:35 |
| fungi | one example i looked at, someone had a change for nova that was getting overlooked, so they finally got up the nerve to ask in #openstack-nova about it... on december 26 when the channel was completely dead | 13:36 |
| fungi | then got frustrated when nobody replied or even noticed | 13:36 |
| amir58118 | bbezak: I agree, Matrix should help. | 13:37 |
| fungi | they weren't from a part of the world that observed holidays at that time of year, so it didn't dawn on them that was not a great time to try to reach out and make contact | 13:37 |
| mnasiadka | Well, yes - I always love people coming in during my night time and disconnect - so we can't really respond to them. | 13:37 |
| mnasiadka | We might think about having a Matrix channel, but I'm afraid these are going to be two disconnected channels (IRC and Matrix) - and we would still be running this meeting here - so I don't know if that would help in anything | 13:38 |
| mnasiadka | And I remember frickler is not a fan of Matrix, or at least his IRC client is not | 13:38 |
| mmalchuk | we can create a bot to connect them) | 13:39 |
| frickler | opendev is planning to do a test with Matrix, let's wait for that to happen first, maybe? | 13:39 |
| fungi | #link https://review.opendev.org/954826 Add spec to use Matrix for OpenDev comms | 13:39 |
| fungi | though the zuul community does already use a matrix channel, has for years | 13:39 |
| bbezak | zuul already is doing that, and it looks nice | 13:39 |
| fungi | and the openstack operators community has a channel since a few months now | 13:40 |
| bbezak | Maybe we can be second ? :) | 13:40 |
| fungi | er, room i mean. matrix calls them rooms, not channels | 13:40 |
| bbezak | really? where I can find all opendev zuul channels? | 13:40 |
| bbezak | I was struggling to list opendev rooms | 13:40 |
| frickler | the operators channel doesn't look like a big success to me | 13:40 |
| fungi | #zuul:opendev.org is the zuul community's room. #openstack-ops:opendev.org is the openstack operators | 13:40 |
| frickler | afaict they aren't discoverable | 13:41 |
| fungi | yeah, it has seen very minimal use so far | 13:41 |
| bbezak | imho public channels should be discoverable | 13:41 |
| fungi | part of the challenge is that discoverable channels, whether in irc or matrix, are a magnet for spammers. but we're looking at a modbot called mjolnir that could improve that situation for matrix | 13:42 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe-config-dev master: Synchronise configuration with master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe-config-dev/+/955454 | 13:42 |
| fungi | spammers will still join discoverable rooms (a lot) but they'll hopefully get banned and their messages hidden fairly quickly | 13:42 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe-config master: Synchronise configuration with master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe-config/+/955453 | 13:43 |
| fungi | fwiw, the mailing lists have that problem too, but i and other ml moderators filter that out so it (usually) doesn't make it through to list subscribers | 13:43 |
| frickler | is discoverability a dynamic property? or do we need to decide when creating a room? | 13:43 |
| fungi | it's configurable per room | 13:44 |
| fungi | it can be adjusted at any time | 13:44 |
| fungi | basically it's just adding it to and removing it from the global/searchable room list | 13:44 |
| bbezak | I'm fine with closed for start if there are some spam problems | 13:45 |
| frickler | also, iiuc, in order to e.g. allow kolla cores to moderate the kolla channel, we'd need to have a dedicated mjolnir instance for that | 13:45 |
| mnasiadka | Ok then - does it mean we'd like to do a proof of concept/testing of an additional Matrix channel for OpenStack Kolla? (in addition to the IRC one) - if that's even possible today | 13:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla master: Influxdb: use stable RHEL repo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/957680 | 13:49 |
| fungi | i don't know enough about mjolnir yet, it's possible room-specific behaviors can be decided by people with elevated permissions in those specific rooms but i'd need to read up on it | 13:50 |
| frickler | I would prefer to see the opendev test go ahead first, but I won't -2 if others want to test something now | 13:50 |
| fungi | if you decide you want one, let me know and i'm happy to do the configuration on the homeserver to create it and add some of you as initial moderators/admins for the room | 13:51 |
| mnasiadka | Ok, thanks - we'll think about it and come back. | 13:52 |
| mnasiadka | I think we covered some of the contributor issues | 13:52 |
| mnasiadka | fungi: Is there something I missed? | 13:52 |
| fungi | there's always more, but that was a great discussion. thanks! | 13:52 |
| mnasiadka | thank you for gathering that data :) | 13:53 |
| mnasiadka | Ok, that covered also Additional agenda I guess | 13:53 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Open discussion | 13:53 |
| mnasiadka | Anybody anything that was not on the agenda? ;-) | 13:53 |
| mmalchuk | own channel in Matrix ?) | 13:53 |
| mnasiadka | We just discussed that | 13:55 |
| mnasiadka | Anything else? | 13:55 |
| mnasiadka | Seems not | 13:56 |
| mnasiadka | Thank you all for coming - see you next week :) | 13:57 |
| mnasiadka | #endmeeting | 13:57 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Aug 20 13:57:06 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 13:57 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2025/kolla.2025-08-20-13.00.html | 13:57 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2025/kolla.2025-08-20-13.00.txt | 13:57 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2025/kolla.2025-08-20-13.00.log.html | 13:57 |
| mmalchuk | thanks mnasiadka | 13:57 |
| amir58118 | Amazing team — I’m really happy to play even a small role in the Kolla project. | 13:57 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla master: Enable Prometheus mtail build for ARM64 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/957675 | 13:58 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla stable/2025.1: Influxdb: use stable RHEL repo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/958088 | 14:03 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla stable/2025.1: Influxdb: use stable RHEL repo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/958088 | 14:04 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla stable/2025.1: Enable Prometheus mtail build for ARM64 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/958089 | 14:05 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla stable/2024.2: Enable Prometheus mtail build for ARM64 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/958090 | 14:07 |
| opendevreview | Amir Hossein Ahmadi proposed openstack/kolla master: swift: Reintroduce support for Swift deployment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/950534 | 14:44 |
| mnasiadka | frickler: seems ubuntu-octavia is failing still, although wsgi api server is now up, so it's some different issue | 14:45 |
| mnasiadka | and proxysql no monitor patch passed second time in a row, so it might be a solution for our headaches | 14:45 |
| opendevreview | Amir Hossein Ahmadi proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: swift: reintroduce Swift role and restore deployment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/953576 | 14:49 |
| frickler | mnasiadka: looks like a different issue in the octavia job, but the -ovn jobs at least are passing, which wasn't the case before when octavia-api was broken | 15:43 |
| frickler | and I'd also appreciate to proceed with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957653 until we find that larger nodes don't help either | 15:45 |
| frickler | bbezak: kevko: ^^ | 15:45 |
| mnasiadka | ok, let's try | 15:46 |
| mnasiadka | still better than disabling proxysql monitor I guess | 15:46 |
| mnasiadka | unless it will be failing again ;) | 15:46 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: octavia: Switch to wsgi module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/958070 | 15:47 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Drop docker_common_options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957228 | 15:47 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe-config-dev master: Synchronise configuration with master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe-config-dev/+/955454 | 15:55 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Use 16GB nodes for debian-bookworm nodes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/957653 | 17:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!