Wednesday, 2026-07-08

opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Test ovn without vpnaas  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99519800:40
kevkoblanson[m], mnasiadka: Guys, can we merge also this ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/989850 06:25
mnasiadkaOh geez, can we stop making such huge patches?06:28
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Add kolla-ansible ovn-migration subcommand  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99609606:36
kevkomnasiadka: why not ? its't not end of the cycle, it's tested, all comments addressed, part of the bigger chain and on the end it's same change but for every single config.json ... what's the problem ? 06:38
opendevreviewMahmoud proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: ceilometer: Copy custom meter definitions into notification agent  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99639606:41
opendevreviewMahmoud proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: prometheus: Fix Skyline blackbox endpoint checks  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99639706:41
opendevreviewMahmoud proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix oslo.messaging qmanager collision between uWSGI APIs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99639806:42
opendevreviewMahmoud proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: mariadb: Use CA certificate in recovery readiness check  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99639906:42
opendevreviewMahmoud proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: ceph-rgw: Move ceph_rgw_swift_compatibility to group_vars  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99640006:42
opendevreviewMahmoud proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: docs: Clarify config override merge vs replace semantics  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99640106:42
opendevreviewMahmoud proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: docs: Warn about matching RadosGW options with external Ceph  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99640206:42
kevko+zuul passing ...06:49
mnasiadkakevko: last cycle we’ve done such things in a per service manner, so it’s easy to review and see impact, the fact that Zuul is passing doesn’t mean you’re not breaking anything we’re not testing or is tested in disabled or always failing scenarios07:13
mnasiadkaReviewing a patch that changes 2500+ lines in hundred files is not what I personally like to do07:15
mikalmnasiadka: speaking of which, I can't think of a way to split up https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/976889 into smaller patches given its all one role, but I am open to suggestions it anyone has any.07:22
mnasiadkamikal: well, that is a new role, and just needs thorough review, I’m rather worried about changing small bits in every role we have that requires extra scrutiny about typos etc07:23
mikalmnasiadka: I think that's fair. I guess I'm more trying to say I don't feel "above the rules", but can't think of a way to not be a bit big here.07:23
kevkomnasiadka: Firstly I raised change in kolla to fix shared logdir and subdirectories owned by services in patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/985300?tab=comments ... you have been the one who wrote me this >>>  "I personally would prefer we don't introduce another script, especially with a wildcard in sudoers - a cleaner approach07:32
kevkowould be to add support for doing this to kolla_set_configs and manage these permissions in kolla-ansible config.json (or future config.yaml)" in that patch 07:32
kevkomnasiadka: So you're saying I should split a single cohesive change with one clear purpose into 48 separate patches, one per service? Am I understanding that correctly? And you won't then tell me I'm wasting Zuul CPU time? No problem ...but don't think it is a right way 07:34
kevkomnasiadka: gerrit has button to "mark reviewed"07:35
opendevreviewMichael Still proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2025.1: Replace periodic-stable-jobs with local job list.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99641207:45
mikal^--- this change attempts to address this problem: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-py39&project=openstack%2Fkolla-ansible&branch=stable%2F2025.1&pipeline=periodic-stable07:46
opendevreviewMichael Still proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2025.2: Replace periodic-stable-jobs with local job list.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99641407:49
mikal^--- and this one is similar but for stable/2025.2: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-py310&project=openstack%2Fkolla-ansible&branch=stable%2F2025.2&pipeline=periodic-stable07:50
opendevreviewAlma MAILLET-CONTOZ proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2026.1: Fix typo in neutron group vars  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99628407:51
opendevreviewMichael Still proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2026.1: Replace periodic-stable-jobs with local job list.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99641507:52
mikal^--- and then finally 2026.1: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-py310&project=openstack%2Fkolla-ansible&branch=stable%2F2026.1&pipeline=periodic-stable07:52
opendevreviewAlma MAILLET-CONTOZ proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2025.2: Fix typo in neutron group vars  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99628507:53
mnasiadkakevko: Thanks, I’ll let the other cores review it.07:53
kevkomnasiadka: okay, thank you also 07:56
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Add kolla-ansible ovn-migration subcommand  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99609607:59
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Explicitly load VPNaaS config in neutron services  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99621608:06
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Add Selenium readiness check and session retry  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99641908:12
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla-ansible master: mariadb: Increase healthcheck start_period to 120s  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99632608:38
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Add kolla-ansible ovn-migration subcommand  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99609608:53
kevkobugfix > https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/996216 <08:55
kevkomnasiadka: thanks 08:59
kevkofwaas has same problem ...will send in hours ..maybe tomorrow09:00
mnasiadkaWell actually, API was running without ml2_conf.ini and it was fine, are you sure we need it in API as well?09:00
*** jhorstmann is now known as Guest1290509:04
kevkomnasiadka: I am hundred percent sure 09:17
mnasiadkaOk, so let’s not use pyargv then and I’m fine :)09:17
kevkowhat ? 09:18
kevkomnasiadka: if there is not defined and neutron is runned as neutron.wsgi.api:application ...from code it's visible that neutron.conf and /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.ini is read -> https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/04f6410f49bf85f7b63a156683eb0e69dd8a90f6/neutron/server/__init__.py#L30-L32 <- here09:20
mnasiadkakevko: I commented in the patch, don’t use pyargv, use the OS_NEUTRON_CONFIG_FILES env var09:21
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Add Selenium readiness check and session retry  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99641909:23
kevkomnasiadka: what's wrong with pyargv ? I know OS_NEUTRON_CONFIG_FILES is an option ... but why it's better ? 09:23
mnasiadkaBecause pyargv is not an option in other wsgi servers like gunicorn or granian which we might add support for in near future09:24
kevkomnasiadka: okay, good point ...09:26
kevkomnasiadka: It's just that I've seen a few cases in our kolla compare scripts where env wasn't compared correctly....or things broke because of nested kolla-toolbox module and similar issues.... I'm just not comfortable relying on it ....file file on disk is just a file on disk ..... but, as I said, I can't really argue with your point  .... it's a09:28
kevkogood one.09:28
kevkomnasiadka: aaaa, okay ..env can be defined in ini file :) ...coool09:29
kevkomnasiadka: okay, should I change a patch for pyargv option and replace by env ? or send a new ? with env ...so we will have both  ? as a option 09:33
kevkoi mean this one 09:33
kevkohttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99621409:33
mnasiadkaI think if we don’t want to use pyargv, then just rework it to use env?09:33
kevkook09:35
blanson[m]mnasiadka: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/996091 this is fine by me, should we +w it ? 09:39
mnasiadkablanson[m]: fire in the hole09:45
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add env option service-uwsgi-config role  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99621409:46
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Explicitly load VPNaaS config in neutron services  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99621609:46
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add env option service-uwsgi-config role  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99621409:48
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Explicitly load VPNaaS config in neutron services  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99621609:48
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Explicitly load VPNaaS config in neutron services  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99621609:59
opendevreviewSean Butler-Lee proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add support for configuring Skyline to use Keystone public URL, c.f. existing support in Horizon  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99643410:02
opendevreviewPiotr Milewski proposed openstack/kolla master: rabbitmq: Update to 4.3  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/98842510:09
opendevreviewSean Butler-Lee proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add support for configuring Skyline to use Keystone public URL  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99643410:11
opendevreviewVerification of a change to openstack/kolla master failed: Migrate to pyproject.toml  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/99609111:05
fricklerhmm, is my perception skewed or is it really rocky causing most of the CI failures currently?11:19
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Add kolla-ansible ovn-migration subcommand  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99609611:20
kevkofrickler: i had same feeling :P 11:24
mnasiadkaI would say podman is the problem11:25
salmankhI have a couple trivial commits, can they be reviewed. Contributing first time to this repo, not sure who to ask or the process. 1. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/996139    2. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99617011:32
mnasiadkasalmankh: reviewed both11:39
mnasiadkaIf any other core wants to have a look at 996170 then it can be merged11:39
mnasiadkasalmankh: the ,,process’’ is sort of defined in https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/latest/contributor/index.html - if there’s anything missing anybody can add something there11:40
salmankhthanks for the reviews, will have a look at the guide.11:42
blanson[m]+2 +w 996170, that's a nice fiux thank you 11:43
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: podman: Fix parse_volumes ignoring rslave propagation in compound modes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99644211:44
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Switch neutron_plugin_agent default to ovn  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/97011411:44
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Switch neutron_plugin_agent default to ovn  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/97011411:45
blanson[m]I love how the podman worker is slowly turning into an alternative api for podman because everything behaves weirdly for it 11:47
blanson[m]pass a list of volumes ? nah let's parse every flag because otherwise the podman api will be mad at us 11:48
mnasiadkaDon’t get me started11:48
mnasiadka:D11:48
mnasiadkaAnd I love that they change things from version to version, because why not :)11:48
blanson[m]it truly is a special child 11:49
blanson[m]welp, ast least the rpc worker fix seems to have somewhat resolved our ci issue 11:51
blanson[m]https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99628011:52
blanson[m]I've had 0 failures in like 20 runs of the podman gate job 11:52
blanson[m]I'll keep spamming it for a little bit 11:52
blanson[m]but I think that's the fix 11:52
mnasiadkaWonder if bumping to the same value as the openstack_service_workers would be enough11:53
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Drop DHCP agent support in ML2/OVN deployments  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99288111:53
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Drop DHCP agent support in ML2/OVN deployments  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99288111:55
mnasiadkaFor the people attending the meeting in an hour - I would like to gather feedback on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/99502511:57
opendevreviewOwen Jones proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix nova-compute startup after reprovisioning  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/93678512:12
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Add kolla-ansible ovn-migration subcommand  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99609612:39
mnasiadkafrickler kevko mmalchuk gkoper jovial mattcrees dougszu darmach pabloclsn ravlew salmankh amir58118 r-krcek blanson[m] - meeting in 8 minutes (reminder)12:52
mnasiadka#startmeeting kolla13:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Jul  8 13:00:12 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'kolla'13:00
mnasiadka#topic rollcall13:00
mnasiadkao/13:00
salmankho/13:00
owenjoneso/13:00
ravlewo/13:01
blanson[m]hello 13:01
opendevreviewVerification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible master failed: neutron: Remove legacy upgrade logic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99288013:03
AlmaMC[m]o/13:04
mnasiadka#topic agenda13:05
mnasiadka* Announcements13:05
mnasiadka* CI status13:05
mnasiadka* Release tasks13:05
mnasiadka* Current cycle planning13:05
mnasiadka* Additional agenda (from whiteboard)13:05
mnasiadka* Open discussion13:05
mnasiadka#topic Announcements13:05
mnasiadkaI signed up Kolla for one session on the upcoming PTG - that is Operator Hour (or however we want to call that)13:06
mnasiadkaThe next elections are coming up at around end of August - beginning of Sep - if anyone wants to relive me from my duty ;-)13:07
mnasiadka#topic CI status13:07
mnasiadkaFailures here and there, today it seems that either OpenDev mirrors or pypi has some problems13:07
mnasiadkaI would rather bet for the latter, because that’s in multiple clouds13:07
* frickler lost track of time, sorry. \o13:07
mnasiadka(As in Zuul provider clouds)13:07
mnasiadkaWe merged some mariadb improvements that should make jobs better, but Kolla CI needs love 24 hours a day13:08
mnasiadka#topic Release tasks13:09
mnasiadkaIt’s R-1213:10
mnasiadkaNothing on the Kolla release calendar13:10
mnasiadkaBut I think we should start wrapping up to bump Ansible and other infrastructure services like RMQ and maybe MariaDB13:10
mnasiadkaAnybody wants to volunteer to create a list of things that need working on? Maybe on the KollaWhiteboard?13:11
blanson[m]as in bump versions of ? 13:11
Viirabbitmq has a bug in the upgrade to the new version13:12
tafkamaxVii: noooo :(((13:12
Viilink: https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/discussions/1682313:12
ViiFixes #16824 addresses this exception and will ship in 4.3.3.13:13
mnasiadkablanson[m]: mariadb, rabbitmq, ansible version supported, and anything else that needs bumping that is not an OpenStack service13:13
blanson[m]I can work on a list13:14
ViiWe need to wait for the new version.13:14
mnasiadkablanson[m]: great, thanks13:14
mnasiadka#topic Current cycle planning13:14
blanson[m]Vii: there is enough work without even thinking asbout rabbitmq for the next few weeks, we should be fine 13:15
mnasiadkaSo, as mentioned before the meeting - I’d like to understand if everyone is happy with merging frickler’s AI policy patch13:15
mnasiadka#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/99502513:15
AlmaMC[m]As I said, I think that this is a good think to have13:16
blanson[m]this seems reasonable to me. This is pretty standard AI policy to avoid getting swamped by LLM patches right ? as in: we're not asking anything extraordinary ?13:16
mnasiadkaI’m thinking to do a followup to this with CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md that would feed the same to people using LLMs13:19
mnasiadkablanson[m]: I think we’re not asking anything extraordinary ;-)13:20
mnasiadkafrickler: fine with merging that as is?13:20
fricklerfine with me13:20
salmankhjust worried by discouraging use of AI, will it not slow down some development or fixes. 13:20
salmankhsome smart projects using AI extensively may take over. 13:21
fricklerquite the opposite IMHO13:21
AlmaMC[m]it explains that you need to fully understand what you're doing. So I don't think so.13:21
mnasiadkaOk then, let me merge that.13:23
salmankhofcourse there would be humans reviewing the code and checking before merge, but discouraging it I may not like. But in general agree to limit it somehow. 13:23
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Add CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md fulfilling established AI policy  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/99644813:24
fricklersalmankh: that's exactly the issue. noone want to review code where one cannot assume that it has been written with good intentions and some basic understanding of what's going on13:25
fricklermnasiadka: do we need to backport the change? I would copy it for all other repos I guess?13:26
mnasiadkafrickler: that would make sense I guess13:27
mnasiadkaOk then, let’s move on13:28
opendevreviewOwen Jones proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix nova-compute startup after reprovisioning  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/93678513:28
mnasiadkaAnyone have any current cycle topic?13:28
Vii#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/KollaWhiteBoard#L6813:30
dougszuImproved baremetal testing: Jed has Sushy working in Tenks here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99595213:30
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Add AI/LLM assistant guide documents  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/99644813:30
dougszuAny ideas for extension in future patches welcome13:30
ViiMaybe we can move some of these forward with merging/review13:30
mnasiadkaOk then, I’ll have a look into the list from Vii later this week13:32
Viiok ty13:32
mnasiadkaAnd good work Jed and dougszu13:32
blanson[m]also13:33
blanson[m]#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/98888213:34
blanson[m]:)13:34
dougszuthanks for updating, I will take another look13:34
mnasiadkaOk then, seems we have covered the additional agenda from Vii13:35
mnasiadkaLet’s move into open discussion13:35
mnasiadka#topic Open discussion13:35
mnasiadkaAnybody has any additional topics?13:35
mnasiadkaSeems not13:40
mnasiadkaReviews welcome on the AI/LLM assistant guides13:40
mnasiadka#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/99644813:40
mnasiadkaAnd see you next week :)13:40
mnasiadka#endmeeting13:40
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Jul  8 13:40:34 2026 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)13:40
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2026/kolla.2026-07-08-13.00.html13:40
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2026/kolla.2026-07-08-13.00.txt13:40
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2026/kolla.2026-07-08-13.00.log.html13:40
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2025.2: Fix typo in neutron group vars  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99628513:49
opendevreviewOwen Jones proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix nova-compute startup after reprovisioning  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/93678513:50
opendevreviewOwen Jones proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix nova-compute startup after reprovisioning  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/93678513:52
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla master: Adopt an AI policy  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/99502513:55
opendevreviewVerification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible master failed: Fix RabbitMQ restart in check mode  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99617014:06
opendevreviewVerification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2026.1 failed: Fix typo in neutron group vars  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99628414:08
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Add kolla-ansible ovn-migration subcommand  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99609614:31
opendevreviewVerification of a change to openstack/kolla master failed: Migrate to pyproject.toml  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/99609114:39
kevkodougszu: here ? 14:54
opendevreviewOwen Jones proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix nova-compute startup after reprovisioning  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/93678515:03
dougszukevko, i'm here15:07
opendevreviewSalman proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix RabbitMQ restart in check mode  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99617015:09
dougszuok, I see your kolla patch now, I hadn't found: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/989849 (it's not a dependency)15:09
dougszuApologies, I hadn't seen all the discussion. 15:13
kevkodougszu: so do you understand now ? 15:27
kevkodougszu: it's cross dependency problem ..so after k-a piece will be merged ..kolla patch will start pass 15:27
kevkodougszu: Right now they simply overlap ... k-a is applied after the image code, so even if something is wrong in the image,k-a ultimately corrects it. Once the Kolla part is removed, only the k-a mplementation remains.15:29
opendevreviewOwen Jones proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix nova-compute startup after reprovisioning  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/93678516:18
dougszukevko: yeah, I do, I was mostly wondering where the Kolla patch was to modify the scripts, since I didn't want to +2 the KA patch without having it ready.16:21
dougszuthe KA patch can still depend on the Kolla patch though right? It would be nice to see them tested together16:23
dougszuYou can temporarily disable the KA CI in the Kolla patch16:23
dougszuand then revert immediately once it merges 16:24
opendevreviewOwen Jones proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix nova-compute startup after reprovisioning  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/93678516:24
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla master: Migrate to pyproject.toml  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/99609116:33
kevkodougszu: you mean add to kolla patch dependency to kolla-ansible patch ? 16:36
kevkodougszu: or vice versa  ? 16:36
dougszuI was thinking the KA patch since there are more relevant tests16:37
kevkodougszu: okay, maybe you will get it ... let me try 16:38
dougszuthanks, I will find the strength to read the last 15 service files 16:38
dougszu(tomorrow now)16:39
kevkodougszu: last time please ...16:39
kevkodougszu: what depend to where ? 16:39
opendevreviewDoug Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Centralize service log directory management  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/98985016:40
dougszuI've added it (others are merged)16:40
dougszuDo you want to fix merge conflicts on the Kolla patch?16:40
kevkodougszu: yeah, i can 16:41
opendevreviewDoug Szumski proposed openstack/kolla master: Remove creating logdirs in docker images  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/98984916:42
dougszuthanks, I will look at them both tomorrow16:42
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla master: Remove creating logdirs in docker images  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/98984916:43
kevkodougszu: But you're aware that the Kolla patch will simply fail, right? Because the Kolla-Ansible part hasn't been merged yet. During CI/testing it just checks out the current master of Kolla-Ansible and runs with that. Since the image changes have already removed those bits everywhere (kolla-patch), but the Kolla-Ansible changes aren't merged yet,16:48
kevkoeverything just falls over. Having a Needed-By relationship doesn't save you here it's just metadata keyword not actually working ... 🙂 Did you get what I mean?16:48
dougszukevko, yeah, added just for the link. I would like to see the KA CI pass using the Kolla patch.16:55
dougszuI don't mind what has to happen to merge both after that16:55
opendevreviewVerification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2026.1 failed: Fix typo in neutron group vars  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99628419:08
mikalI am not sure why this review has two +2's but hasn't been merged? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/98961219:18
mnasiadkamikal: do you think that should be backported?19:31
mnasiadkaAh ok, has BC +119:31
mnasiadkaSmall enough that probably doesn’t need bug or reno19:31
mikalmnasiadka: I think it would be nice, but not absolutely necessary. That is, it would be a quality of life improvement for deployers, but it isn't a critical feature or a security risk.19:32
mikalSo I think whether or not we bothered would depend on workload -- what would we be deferring in order to make time to backport it?19:32
mikalAlso, thanks for the +W.19:33
mnasiadkamikal: usually we require a bug linked or a release note for backporting, but this is so minimal that we can live without that19:33
mikalOk. I am happy to give doing the backports a go, but noting a made a mess of it last time because its not something I've done much. Is there a cheat sheet or something I should follow?19:33
mnasiadkamikal: I usually just use Gerrit UI for backports, that patch shouldn’t give us any merge conflicts. The tricky part is if the k-a patch needs a new kolla image version, then we need to add some safeguards (like you did when asked last time)19:38
mikalmnasiadka: Huh, I didn't even know you could use the UI. Where is it in that?19:39
mnasiadkaIf you do that from CLI - just remember doing -x (so there’s master commit id trace jn commit message)19:39
mnasiadkamikal: three dots on the top right corner and click cherry pick19:39
opendevreviewMichael Still proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2026.1: Make the MariaDB WSREP sync wait defensive.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99652419:40
mikalI did that, but I think maybe I am meant to add the "(cherry picked from ...)" manually myself?19:41
kevkomnasiadka: linters failing for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/989612 now :D 20:03
kevkomnasiadka: check zuul filrer20:03
opendevreviewVerification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible master failed: Make the MariaDB WSREP sync wait defensive.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/98961220:04
mnasiadkakevko: it just needs a rebase20:06
opendevreviewMichael Still proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Make the MariaDB WSREP sync wait defensive.  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/98961220:06
mnasiadkamikal: if you cherry pick a merged change then it gets added automatically20:06
mikalOh, ok. I will abandon that one and do it again when the merge has happened.20:07
mnasiadkamikal: leave it open and just redo the chery pick when it’s merged - it will get updated automatically20:09
mnasiadkaAnd if you abandon - it will complain it’s closed and you will need to restore it first20:10
mikalRight. An unabandon it is then!20:10
mikalSorry to be a n00b.20:11
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: neutron: Add kolla-ansible ovn-migration subcommand  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/99609620:14
opendevreviewKurt Bendl proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: DNM: selinux security_opt and policy generation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/98639921:11
opendevreviewKurt Bendl proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: DNM: selinux security_opt and policy generation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/98639921:25

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!