| opendevreview | likui proposed openstack/octavia-lib master: Replace deprecated UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE variable https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-lib/+/804941 | 03:14 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | likui proposed openstack/octavia-lib master: Changed minversion in tox to 3.18.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-lib/+/804942 | 03:15 |
| opendevreview | Hemanth N proposed openstack/octavia master: Fix duplicate SG creation for listener peer port https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/804485 | 03:37 |
| opendevreview | Gregory Thiemonge proposed openstack/octavia master: Allow multiple VIPs per LB https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/660239 | 07:43 |
| opendevreview | Gregory Thiemonge proposed openstack/octavia master: Allow multiple VIPs per LB https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/660239 | 08:21 |
| opendevreview | Hemanth N proposed openstack/octavia master: Fix duplicate SG creation for listener peer port https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/804485 | 08:51 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/octavia stable/victoria: Add amphora_id in store params for failover_amphora https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/798569 | 12:12 |
| opendevreview | Ann Taraday proposed openstack/octavia master: Update nr_open limit value in the amphora https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/787528 | 14:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/octavia stable/victoria: Fix race conditions between API and worker DB calls https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/798256 | 15:53 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/octavia stable/ussuri: Fix race conditions between API and worker DB calls https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/798257 | 15:56 |
| gthiemonge | #startmeeting Octavia | 16:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Aug 18 16:00:38 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gthiemonge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' | 16:00 |
| gthiemonge | Hi | 16:00 |
| johnsom | o/ | 16:00 |
| gthiemonge | #topic Announcements | 16:02 |
| gthiemonge | octavia-lib final release this week | 16:02 |
| gthiemonge | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/804667 | 16:02 |
| gthiemonge | next milestone is Xena-3 (Feature Freeze, Final release for client libraries) in two weeks. | 16:02 |
| gthiemonge | I don't know if we need a priority review etherpad for Xena | 16:02 |
| gthiemonge | any opinions? | 16:03 |
| johnsom | Is everything landed for Xena we want to get it? If not, we probably should have a review sheet. | 16:03 |
| gthiemonge | ack | 16:04 |
| gthiemonge | I'll update the etherpad (url in the topic of the channel) for Xena | 16:04 |
| gthiemonge | Collecting Pain Points | 16:05 |
| gthiemonge | There's a thread on the openstack-discuss ML: Please Help On Collecting Pain Points | 16:05 |
| gthiemonge | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-August/024154.html | 16:05 |
| gthiemonge | One of the community goals for Yoga would be to eliminate those pain points. | 16:05 |
| gthiemonge | Contributors, Users, feel free to add your pain points in the following etherpad: | 16:06 |
| gthiemonge | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/pain-point-elimination | 16:06 |
| gthiemonge | I've almost forgotten the last announcement: PTG | 16:07 |
| gthiemonge | I created an etherpad for the Octavia PTG | 16:08 |
| gthiemonge | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/yoga-ptg-octavia | 16:08 |
| gthiemonge | I'll add more topics there | 16:08 |
| gthiemonge | Please add anything you would like to discuss | 16:08 |
| gthiemonge | Any other announcements? | 16:10 |
| johnsom | PTL elections are open | 16:10 |
| gthiemonge | you're right | 16:11 |
| johnsom | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-August/024093.html | 16:11 |
| gthiemonge | thanks for the heads-up johnsom | 16:12 |
| gthiemonge | #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review | 16:14 |
| gthiemonge | FYI I rebased Adam's work (multi-vip support) on top of my "generic network management" patch | 16:14 |
| gthiemonge | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/660239 | 16:14 |
| johnsom | Not a lot to report from my side. Some reviews going on. Right now I'm working on the "generic network management" patch review. | 16:14 |
| gthiemonge | It is _not_ a priority for reviews, I guess it will wait until the Yoga cycle | 16:15 |
| gthiemonge | johnsom: +1 | 16:15 |
| gthiemonge | the generic network management patch is important, I'd like to merge it before Xena-3 | 16:16 |
| johnsom | Yes | 16:16 |
| gthiemonge | The amphorav2->amphora change as well | 16:16 |
| gthiemonge | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/740432 | 16:16 |
| johnsom | Yes, I keep thinking I had already reviewed that but I guess not. | 16:17 |
| gthiemonge | #topic Open Discussion | 16:19 |
| gthiemonge | I have one question here, for johnsom and rm_work | 16:19 |
| gthiemonge | I was reviewing this change: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/804485/4/octavia/network/drivers/neutron/allowed_address_pairs.py | 16:19 |
| gthiemonge | I noticed that the listener object has a peer_port field. it was used in the split_listener haproxy configuration files, but it's no longer used | 16:20 |
| gthiemonge | should we now consider that HAPROXY_BASE_PEER_PORT is always the peer_port for haproxy? | 16:21 |
| johnsom | Yeah, we consolidated down to one port as everything on the amp has a shared fate. | 16:21 |
| gthiemonge | (it also means that listeners on the same LB share the same peer tables) | 16:21 |
| gthiemonge | ok | 16:21 |
| johnsom | The old split way had multiple processes running and required multiple unique ports. We simplified that with the single process work. | 16:22 |
| gthiemonge | so does it mean that this code for instance (https://opendev.org/openstack/octavia/src/branch/master/octavia/db/repositories.py#L1114-L1125) can be removed? | 16:23 |
| johnsom | Once we remove multi-process yes | 16:24 |
| rm_work | Oh on the multiple vip patch, remember it is NOT READY. Just a rebase is one small piece of the work necessary | 16:24 |
| johnsom | lol, conversation branch | 16:24 |
| gthiemonge | :-) | 16:24 |
| rm_work | Yeah I got the notification a little late lol | 16:24 |
| gthiemonge | rm_work: yeah still WIP | 16:24 |
| gthiemonge | but it passes zuul CI | 16:25 |
| gthiemonge | johnsom: removing multi-process... when can we do it? do we still support amps with multi-process? | 16:26 |
| johnsom | There is an argument someone (grin) made a long time ago that the peer traffic should cross the lb-mgmt-net. This way that one port would not be used. This however requires using the netns support in haproxy and would slightly increase the security exposure. Multiple IPs using IPv6 might be the better option really. Like using link-local for example. But again, that is some engineering work. | 16:28 |
| johnsom | On the multi-process, it has been in deprecation with warning messages for a while. I would have to check the deprecation expiration release. I expect we can remove it now. For sure in Yoga. Probably best to do early in Yoga. | 16:29 |
| gthiemonge | Ok Cool! | 16:29 |
| johnsom | Yeah, I think that was in Train, so... Probably good to be removed | 16:30 |
| gthiemonge | this could be a topic for the PTG: Removing old stuff | 16:31 |
| johnsom | Yes, there is a bunch of stuff to purge | 16:31 |
| gthiemonge | Ok thanks johnsom | 16:33 |
| gthiemonge | Any other topics? | 16:33 |
| gthiemonge | Ok! | 16:35 |
| gthiemonge | thanks everyone! | 16:35 |
| gthiemonge | #endmeeting | 16:35 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Aug 18 16:35:42 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:35 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/octavia/2021/octavia.2021-08-18-16.00.html | 16:35 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/octavia/2021/octavia.2021-08-18-16.00.txt | 16:35 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/octavia/2021/octavia.2021-08-18-16.00.log.html | 16:35 |
| johnsom | Thanks Greg | 16:35 |
| frigo | hi lbaas! what base image do you run usually to install devstack? | 18:57 |
| johnsom | frigo Some of use run centos 8, some run Ubuntu focal | 20:21 |
| johnsom | This may help you as well: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/project-testing-interface.html#linux-distributions | 20:27 |
| frigo | ok thanks. I am trying with focal but had to remove some python packages (python3-pyasn1 python3-pyasn1-modules python3-simplejson) to get it working | 20:27 |
| johnsom | Yeah, there can be some package conflicts between pip and ubuntu | 20:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!