| opendevreview | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia master: Resolve a UDP rebalance issue on backend failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/957806 | 01:26 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/python-octaviaclient master: tox: Drop envdir https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-octaviaclient/+/941187 | 02:47 |
| opendevreview | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/octavia master: Resolve a UDP rebalance issue on backend failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/957806 | 03:26 |
| johnsom | #startmeeting Octavia | 16:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Aug 20 16:00:00 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is johnsom. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'octavia' | 16:00 |
| johnsom | Hello everyone | 16:00 |
| gthiemonge | o/ | 16:00 |
| johnsom | #topic Announcements | 16:00 |
| johnsom | This week is library feature freeze | 16:00 |
| johnsom | Next week is feature freeze for everything else. | 16:00 |
| johnsom | Also, PTL nominations close today (if they haven't already) | 16:02 |
| gthiemonge | johnsom: any important feature patches to review? | 16:03 |
| gthiemonge | looking at the PTG notes, the high priority features are merged.. | 16:04 |
| johnsom | Yeah, the only thing that I am aware of is this graph tree patch chain for the driver agent, but I don't think it is going to make it. | 16:05 |
| gthiemonge | +1 | 16:06 |
| johnsom | Any other announcements this week? | 16:06 |
| gthiemonge | no | 16:06 |
| johnsom | #topic Brief progress reports / bugs needing review | 16:07 |
| johnsom | I have been working on the UDP bug: | 16:07 |
| johnsom | #link https://launchpad.net/bugs/2114264 | 16:07 |
| johnsom | I had to refresh my memory on that as it wasn't code I wrote and I haven't poked around with the UDP engine in a while. | 16:08 |
| johnsom | Long story short, I have a proposed patch for review: | 16:08 |
| johnsom | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/957806 | 16:08 |
| johnsom | I thought the quiescent setting would impact the ability to "drain" a backend member, but I was wrong and testing showed it only impacts the persistence table. | 16:09 |
| johnsom | So many little details in there.... lol | 16:10 |
| gthiemonge | I have been working on an old bug with l7rules, using FILE_TYPE and EQUAL_TO doesn't work as expected | 16:10 |
| gthiemonge | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/957853 | 16:10 |
| johnsom | But I think that patch is good now and the reporter also commented in IRC that it resolved their issue. | 16:10 |
| gthiemonge | I also found and fixed a bug with l7rules in the client : | 16:10 |
| gthiemonge | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-octaviaclient/+/957855 | 16:10 |
| johnsom | Nice! | 16:11 |
| gthiemonge | I also rebased and updated the tempest tests for the Custom SGs on VIP port: | 16:12 |
| gthiemonge | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/932321 | 16:12 |
| gthiemonge | it tests the feature only with HTTP (IPv4 and IPv6), I'm wondering if we need more coverage | 16:13 |
| johnsom | Oh, we still have some open over there... .Good to know | 16:13 |
| johnsom | I think we have a lot of bug fixes to land.... | 16:14 |
| gthiemonge | johnsom: I think I still have a script that prepares the content of https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/octavia-priority-reviews | 16:15 |
| gthiemonge | do you want me to update it? | 16:16 |
| johnsom | That would be great | 16:16 |
| gthiemonge | ack | 16:16 |
| johnsom | Alright, any other updates? | 16:18 |
| gthiemonge | nop | 16:18 |
| johnsom | #topic Open Discussion | 16:18 |
| johnsom | Any other topics this week? | 16:18 |
| johnsom | Ok then, thanks for joining! | 16:21 |
| gthiemonge | johnsom: thanks! | 16:21 |
| johnsom | #endmeeting | 16:21 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Aug 20 16:21:11 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:21 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/octavia/2025/octavia.2025-08-20-16.00.html | 16:21 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/octavia/2025/octavia.2025-08-20-16.00.txt | 16:21 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/octavia/2025/octavia.2025-08-20-16.00.log.html | 16:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/octavia master: Update the default TLS ciphers list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/948674 | 17:56 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/octavia master: Fixed http_version and domain_name in haproxy templates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/956751 | 18:21 |
| c0lin | hi folks, i'm considering launching openstack using a neutron network resembling this doc https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/2025.1/admin/config-bgp-floating-ip-over-l2-segmented-network.html and need to know if octavia + ovn is the best path into future releases with improved capabilities and ongoing support? | 18:44 |
| c0lin | or, if not, what is the project's recommendation? | 18:44 |
| johnsom | c0lin When you say "octavia + ovn" do you mean the ovn ML2 for neutron or the ovn provider for Octavia. | 18:50 |
| johnsom | If you mean Octavia on neutron ML2 OVN, then yes, that is the current "best practice" in OpenStack. | 18:53 |
| c0lin | our preference is to use the OVN provider for octavia. to do this, i thought we’d need to use the ML2 plug-in in neutron. if that’s not the case i’d appreciate advice or links that help differentiate between the available options and what they enable/disable and which will be supported in future releases | 20:41 |
| c0lin | with https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/2025.1/admin/config-ml2.html as a staring point for my understanding | 20:42 |
| johnsom | Yes, you will need to use the OVN ML2. Note, the OVN provider has a limited feature set: https://docs.openstack.org/octavia/latest/user/feature-classification/index.html | 20:44 |
| c0lin | think i understand the ovn provider has a limited feature set, but we like the idea of running without amphorae so it felt important to try and clarify as much as possible. i hope to use the ovn-bgp-agent to advertise octavia VIPs at least until neutron’s ovn driver supports bgp natively https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111276 unless you folks see any red flags with that approach? | 22:14 |
| c0lin | really nice to see such a familiar and helpful face (read: nick) again after a ~six year hiatus btw johnsom; same colin from ~2019 in this channel just a different gig now, if that rings a bell | 23:13 |
| c0lin | thanks again for your invaluable help back then! | 23:13 |
| johnsom | Yeah, it does. Welcome back! | 23:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!