| opendevreview | Cyril Roelandt proposed openstack/octavia master: Replace glanceclient with openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/971149 | 01:47 |
|---|---|---|
| *** zseguin_ is now known as zseguin | 04:18 | |
| *** zseguin_ is now known as zseguin | 05:46 | |
| *** zseguin is now known as Guest33702 | 05:47 | |
| rbachman[m] | Hi everyone, quick ops question: | 10:21 |
| rbachman[m] | The upgrade docs at https://docs.openstack.org/octavia/latest/admin/guides/upgrade.html say that "Upgrades are only supported between sequential releases. For example, upgrading from Pike to Queens is supported while from Pike to Rocky is not.". | 10:21 |
| rbachman[m] | Does this mean no jumping from one SLURP release to another, or should those work as expected? | 10:21 |
| gthiemonge | THIS PAGE LAST UPDATED: 2020-05-22 | 10:30 |
| gthiemonge | I don't think this doc is correct | 10:30 |
| gthiemonge | rbachman[m]: jumping from a SLURP release to the next one is supported | 11:09 |
| gthiemonge | and before SLURP releases were introduced we supported FFUs (update from n to n+3), so that doc is really old | 11:10 |
| rbachman[m] | Ok grand, thanks! I'll try out the SLURP jump early next year | 12:07 |
| opendevreview | Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/octavia-dashboard master: Handle timeout in poll_loadbalancer_status https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-dashboard/+/933389 | 14:55 |
| opendevreview | Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/octavia-dashboard master: Handle timeout in poll_loadbalancer_status https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-dashboard/+/933389 | 14:55 |
| skraynev_ | @gthiemonge hi. I just found interesting behaviour, that if on LB creation specify network id - Octavia will create VIP port with device_id, device_owner. However if specify port_id directly instead of network id - port's fields for device_owner, device_id will no b updated. is it expected behaviour ? p.s I use pretty old 2023.1 version and did not check it on fresh devstack | 14:57 |
| skraynev_ | and one offtopic: please review PR: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/852269 | 14:58 |
| croelandt | Hey! Is the segfault for py310 expected here? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/971149 | 15:04 |
| opendevreview | Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/octavia master: Add Barbican secrets consumers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/864308 | 15:45 |
| opendevreview | Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/octavia master: Add Barbican secrets consumers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/864308 | 15:46 |
| gthiemonge | skrayne__: yeha I think it is expected, as it's a user's port, octavia doesn't need to update it. AFAIK things like device_owner are used to track ports that Octavia has to delete when the LB is deleted | 19:00 |
| skrayne__ | got it, thank you | 19:01 |
| gthiemonge | croelandt: nop, it should not segfault, I think i've seen it a couple of times in the CI in different tests, it's really weird | 19:02 |
| gthiemonge | oh you hit it twice | 19:03 |
| opendevreview | Zachary Mark Raines proposed openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin master: Update stable-2024.1 jobs to unmaintained branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/971260 | 21:39 |
| opendevreview | Zachary Mark Raines proposed openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin master: WIP: Update stable-2024.1 jobs to unmaintained branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/971260 | 21:46 |
| croelandt | gthiemonge: yeah and I don't think that's my code :D | 23:01 |
| opendevreview | Zachary Mark Raines proposed openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin master: Update stable-2024.1 jobs to unmaintained branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/971260 | 23:35 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!