Friday, 2020-02-14

*** sfernand has quit IRC00:00
*** vhari has quit IRC00:02
*** jmlowe has joined #openstack-manila00:15
*** jmlowe has quit IRC00:33
*** tosky has quit IRC00:51
*** dviroel has quit IRC03:02
carthacadviroel: sure, just to this resources I sadly can't provide insights of a large installation, since we aren't using share groups and share net subnets at the moment05:06
*** jcollin has joined #openstack-manila05:17
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila08:14
*** tosky has joined #openstack-manila08:36
openstackgerritMaari Tamm proposed openstack/manila-ui master: Add missing translation support to Access Rules Tables  https://review.opendev.org/70779309:33
*** jcollin has quit IRC09:52
*** jcollin has joined #openstack-manila09:56
*** jcollin has quit IRC10:49
openstackgerritMerged openstack/manila master: Don't send heartbeats if driver not initializing correctly  https://review.opendev.org/69795711:26
openstackgerritMerged openstack/manila master: Fix release note for LP 1853940's bugfix  https://review.opendev.org/70703612:06
openstackLaunchpad bug 1853940 in Manila "manila service list shows up for uninitialized driver" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1853940 - Assigned to haixin (haixin77)12:06
carthacaA little Friday story: I'm playing around with manila manage. I have admin privileges in a project that is purely for admin tasks. Ergo no quota, so I get a quota error on manila manage. Would be nice to be able to specify a target project for my managed share by the way. Now I have to get admin in my target project and do the manage command there again.. But back to the first attempt. The share ends up in manage_error. Okay.. let's get rid of13:10
carthacamanila delete does not work (needs state 'available', 'error', 'inactive') Okay I don't care - it is a failed import anyhow. Force delete... Now I can manage in the proper project, but no, OOPS: the back end share is gone, because it apparently was already half-managed and got removed with the force delete.13:10
carthacaAnd though it failed with OverQuota on deletion it tried to reduce the usage - I ge the nice warning Change will make usage less than 0 for the following resources: ['gigabytes', 'shares']13:11
carthacaLuckily this was only some empty test share in the back :D13:12
*** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-manila13:35
*** jvisser_ has joined #openstack-manila14:05
tbarroncarthaca: so the bug here is that if 'manila manage' fails due to quota there is no good way out and a 'force delete'  destroys the (not-yet) managed share?15:06
tbarroncarthaca: seems worthy of a LP ...15:06
carthacayepp15:06
* tbarron returns to his own downstream Friday world of pain ...15:07
carthacaI may try again and do a reset status insted of force delete to trick the quota system and have my managed share anyway15:08
carthacafree space!15:08
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila15:33
*** dviroel has joined #openstack-manila15:35
*** jmlowe has joined #openstack-manila16:57
*** lpetrut has quit IRC17:09
*** eharney has quit IRC17:45
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila17:58
*** eharney has quit IRC18:33
*** jmlowe has quit IRC18:46
openstackgerritMerged openstack/manila-specs master: Update Create Share from Snapshot in Another Pool  https://review.opendev.org/70077618:53
dviroel\o/18:59
*** tosky has quit IRC19:36
carlosshey, gouthamr19:41
carlosssaw your comments in the spec19:41
carlossI have something to discuss about it19:43
gouthamrcarloss: hey carloss19:43
gouthamrsure, sup?19:43
carlossI see your point where you said that we should allow that value being set to 219:45
carlossbut I think that 2 being the "default" may cause misunderstanding in the user19:46
carlossso my suggestion here is to have it set to 'greater than or equal to 1'19:46
carlossand it should mean that the user is able to create 1 passive/inactive replica19:47
carlossand this 1 value would not consider the active replica19:48
carlosswhat do you think?19:48
gouthamrcarloss: a replicated share starts out with 1 replica... that's been called out in the docs19:54
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila19:54
gouthamrcarloss: the active/passive thing makes sense for two of the three kinds of replication we have19:55
gouthamrcarloss: but the third/synchronous active-active case, we don't really have a passive replica19:56
carlosshmm, so that only works for some types of replication19:59
gouthamrcarloss: yes, i'm assuming we can clarify in the quota error messages for those that need to know20:01
*** jmlowe has joined #openstack-manila20:03
*** eharney has quit IRC20:10
carlossalright, gouthamr... thanks!20:13
carlossI'm going to propose a new patch soon20:14
gouthamrty carloss20:15
openstackgerritCarlos Eduardo proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Add lite spec to fix unlimited share replicas per share  https://review.opendev.org/70479320:23
*** jmlowe has quit IRC21:00
*** eharney has joined #openstack-manila21:15
openstackgerritCarlos Eduardo proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Add lite spec to fix unlimited share replicas per share  https://review.opendev.org/70479321:21
openstackgerritGoutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Move all conditions skipped under "skip_checks" method  https://review.opendev.org/70134021:22
openstackgerritGoutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Move all conditions skipped under "skip_checks" method  https://review.opendev.org/70134021:22
*** jmlowe has joined #openstack-manila21:36
*** maaritamm has quit IRC21:48
*** enriquetaso has quit IRC21:49
*** maaritamm has joined #openstack-manila21:55
*** jmlowe has quit IRC22:04
vkmchttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/698848/22:28
vkmcready for the +2's22:28
vkmcmake the rainn22:28
*** maaritamm has quit IRC22:39
*** dviroel has quit IRC22:51
*** jmlowe has joined #openstack-manila23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!