| *** brinzhang has joined #openstack-manila | 00:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila master: CIFS extension failing because of volume in use https://review.opendev.org/498445 | 00:12 |
|---|---|---|
| openstackgerrit | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: DNM: Testing CIFS extend/shrink failures https://review.opendev.org/727895 | 00:15 |
| *** andrebeltrami has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
| *** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 01:35 | |
| *** brinzhang has quit IRC | 01:38 | |
| openstackgerrit | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: DNM: Testing CIFS extend/shrink failures https://review.opendev.org/727895 | 02:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: DNM: Testing CIFS extend/shrink failures https://review.opendev.org/727895 | 02:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: DNM: Testing CIFS extend/shrink failures https://review.opendev.org/727895 | 02:46 |
| *** maaritamm has joined #openstack-manila | 04:26 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-manila | 07:31 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 11:25 | |
| *** lseki has quit IRC | 11:51 | |
| *** tkajinam has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 12:36 | |
| *** lseki has joined #openstack-manila | 12:41 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-manila | 12:48 | |
| *** andrebeltrami has joined #openstack-manila | 13:03 | |
| *** hoonetorg has quit IRC | 13:16 | |
| *** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-manila | 13:22 | |
| openstackgerrit | Chris MacNaughton (icey) proposed openstack/manila stable/ussuri: Monkey patch original current_thread _active https://review.opendev.org/728079 | 13:32 |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 13:46 | |
| *** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 14:02 | |
| *** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 14:03 | |
| dviroel | gouthamr: sup! | 14:41 |
| dviroel | regarding this https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1699856 | 14:41 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1699856 in OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) "Tempest tests missing adding Security service to share-network" [Medium,Triaged] - Assigned to Douglas Viroel (dviroel) | 14:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Victoria Martinez de la Cruz proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Add native zuulv3 job for cephfs nfs https://review.opendev.org/726088 | 14:41 |
| dviroel | if we provide a pre-created security service to tempest, will be an scenario where it won't be accessible to an user? I mean. is there a scenario where not admin users try to set up a share network, and we automatically associate the pre-created sec service, and it goes bad? | 14:43 |
| dviroel | we didn't face that issue yet, I'm trying to anticipate that | 14:44 |
| dviroel | admin won't face issues when trying to associate pre-created sec services | 14:45 |
| *** felipe_rodrigues has joined #openstack-manila | 15:04 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-manila | 15:12 | |
| e0ne | hi. I'm trying to get manila working on my env. for now, test_list_share_export_locations_by_member tests fails permanently. is there any config option in tempest plugin or manila I should check? | 15:13 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: sorry, i noticed this now - we'll speak about it in the meeting if you want.. | 15:17 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: ok | 15:17 |
| gouthamr | e0ne: we're in #openstack-meeting-alt for the weekly manila meeting - please feel free to join us there, it's likely your issue is recently caused - are you running with the latest manila-tempest-plugin? | 15:18 |
| e0ne | gouthamr: actually, not | 15:18 |
| e0ne | I'll try to check it with the latest tempest plugin | 15:20 |
| e0ne | gouthamr: I used incorrect version of tempest plugin. my fail :( | 15:23 |
| gouthamr | np e0ne! good to know it's resolved | 15:25 |
| *** vhari has quit IRC | 15:27 | |
| *** vhari has joined #openstack-manila | 15:42 | |
| *** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 15:44 | |
| *** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 15:45 | |
| *** hoonetorg has quit IRC | 15:56 | |
| dviroel | gouthamr: lunch time, will be back in a hour, and we can continue to discuss about that bug | 16:00 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: sure thing | 16:00 |
| *** gregwork has joined #openstack-manila | 16:03 | |
| *** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-manila | 16:08 | |
| *** gouthamr has left #openstack-manila | 16:43 | |
| *** gouthamr has joined #openstack-manila | 16:43 | |
| *** vhari has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
| *** hoonetorg has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
| *** vhari has joined #openstack-manila | 17:11 | |
| *** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
| *** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-manila | 17:14 | |
| dviroel | gouthamr: hey, when you some minutes.. | 17:17 |
| *** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-manila | 17:19 | |
| gouthamr | dviroel: hi, again | 17:24 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: so, you can expect the security service to be accessible via the external network for now | 17:24 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: that way, it's available to all project networks that route to it... project networks are setup with one by default.. | 17:25 |
| gouthamr | one = router with external network gateway | 17:26 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: should we worry about credentials issues when associating this pre-created security service to dynamic share networks? | 17:32 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: what kind? | 17:32 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: test classes are creating share networks that can be used on different tests, when we were trying to configure associate a pre-created security service to all of them | 17:33 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: let me rephrase, we are running tests with a single pre-created security service, provided via tempest.conf | 17:37 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: this means that all projects will be using the same security service, and so far we don't face any issue with that (api testing) | 17:37 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: why would we share the security service? | 17:39 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: we/the test accounts/credentials | 17:39 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: we could create a new security service every time a new network is created? | 17:39 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: yeah, this might be the correct approach, | 17:40 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: they'll all refer to the same security service backend, but in the tests, each network gets its own manila security service | 17:40 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: in that case, each test will create a new manila security service, using the info got from the pre-created one? | 17:41 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: each network perhaps - sometimes we end up sharing networks across tests in a test class... the info'll be from config | 17:42 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: true | 17:44 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: from config? one config per sec service param? | 17:45 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: or one dictopt if that's better to document | 17:46 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: we'll need *all* values, so perhaps dictopt's better | 17:46 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: we were thinking on copying from a pre-created sec service, bad idea? | 17:47 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: ive seen resistance from test runners to do pre-work | 17:48 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: vkmc removed the need for share type to be configured for this reason | 17:48 |
| gouthamr | (scenario tests still rely on a default share type, but we'll get that fixed soon) | 17:48 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: oh, i was thinking that one configuration would be easier, but usually needs work in test script to have this working also. | 17:49 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: should we care about having more than one sec service? | 17:50 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: yes, and there are all sorts of "test hooks" written - so we'll have to mess with those, ex: python-tempestconf | 17:50 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: sure! we might as well | 17:51 |
| dviroel | dviroel: lets start with a simple dictopt and see how this can grows | 17:54 |
| *** felipe_rodrigues has quit IRC | 17:54 | |
| dviroel | gouthamr: ^ hahah | 17:54 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: i think that it's expect that all share network created by tempest to be associated with the sec serv, if provided, right? | 17:55 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: there are specific test classes that create that own share network + sec service, but this is a different case | 17:56 |
| openstackgerrit | Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/puppet-manila stable/ussuri: Switch to Ussuri https://review.opendev.org/728185 | 18:01 |
| gouthamr | dviroel: sorry, was afk - ack, there will be "API only" tests that create security services, we can ignore those | 18:10 |
| dviroel | gouthamr: no, thanks | 18:25 |
| dviroel | s/no/np | 18:25 |
| openstackgerrit | Alex Schultz proposed openstack/puppet-manila master: Bump version for the start of Victoria https://review.opendev.org/728233 | 18:26 |
| *** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
| *** brinzhang has joined #openstack-manila | 18:33 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 19:34 | |
| *** maaritamm has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
| *** andrebeltrami has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
| *** tkajinam has joined #openstack-manila | 22:58 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!