Thursday, 2026-06-25

opendevreviewMedha Choudhary proposed openstack/manila master: Fix migration_get_progress to use GET at microversion 2.97  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/98994105:21
opendevreviewMedha Choudhary proposed openstack/python-manilaclient master: Update migration_get_progress to use GET at microversion 2.97  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/98994805:21
opendevreviewMedha Choudhary proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Update migration_get_progress client to use GET at microversion 2.97  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/98994905:22
opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph master: Fix RadosGW code path and common bugs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/97898706:29
opendevreviewSrinesh A R proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: [WIP] - Add tests for new snapshot_inherit_share_access share type  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/99487811:06
opendevreviewGireesh Awasthi proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Specs for share server replica  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/98849511:40
opendevreviewMedha Choudhary (netapp) proposed openstack/manila master: WIP: Netapp cg-snapshot workflow implementation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/99488412:13
opendevreviewSrinesh A R proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: [WIP] - Add tests for new snapshot_inherit_share_access share type  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/99487812:42
stephenfinSilviaWachira[m]: Can you tell me why we need this? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/970818/comment/49ea01b5_3238e4be/14:45
*** vhari_ is now known as vhari15:01
opendevreviewSrinesh A R proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: [WIP] - Add tests for new snapshot_inherit_share_access share type  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/99492415:01
opendevreviewSrinesh A R proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: [WIP] - Add tests for new snapshot_inherit_share_access share type  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/99487815:09
stephenfingouthamr: carloss: I've proposed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/994925 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/994922 as follow-ups to SilviaWachira[m]'s bootstrap patch. If you've time to review today, that should unblock the rest of the stack15:10
stephenfinhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/994925/ is important otherwise we'll get inconsistent behavior if python-manilaclient is installed, since commands could come from different places15:11
stephenfinI _think_ the manilaclient commands would be prefered since entrypoint loading is done alphabetically (m < o) but I'd rather not rely on that implementation behavior15:12
stephenfinAlso, I am +2 on all current patches in the series now so the ball's back in your court15:17
stephenfinFinally, I am on paternity leave for 4 weeks starting on Monday. I won't be reviewing anything during that time, but if you're happy to continue working through them and reivewing yourself, I'll hit the full stack (and hopefully +W the lot) as soon as I'm back15:18
gouthamrstephenfin: o/ thank you.. that's awesome15:28
gouthamrfirstly, congratulations!15:28
gouthamrthis is great news.. we'll miss you, and i'll make sure not to tag you in reviews or cause pings in the absence :)  15:29
gouthamri'll take a look at the patches/updates you posted.. ty very much for the help with this, and for guiding SilviaWachira[m] 15:29
stephenfinty! :)15:30
opendevreviewMerged openstack/manila-specs master: Add Lustre share driver spec  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/98730715:35
opendevreviewkiran pawar proposed openstack/manila master: Deferred delete share server and share network  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/98170615:41
SilviaWachira[m]stephenfin: Congratulations! stephenfin 15:48
JayFgrats stephenfin! enjoy the time away and the new kiddo15:49
vharibig congrats stephenfin! 16:13
vhariexciting times :)16:13
SilviaWachira[m]stephenfin: I checked compute, volume, network, and identity client.py on master — none of them call setup_auth(). I'll remove it in a follow-up. 17:02
stephenfinSilviaWachira[m]: JayF: vhari: Thanks! :)17:03
stephenfinSilviaWachira[m]: great, thank you. If you can push that update in the next 25 mins or so I can ack it17:04
SilviaWachira[m]stephenfin: My VM is down. I have pinged gouthamr to restart it so I am waiting for him.17:09
gouthamryikes, doing17:09
gouthamrSilviaWachira[m]: unsure what happened here, but it's done now.. 17:14
SilviaWachira[m]gouthamr: Thanks17:14
SilviaWachira[m]stephenfin: 994922 is updated with the setup_auth() removal 17:28
stephenfinyup, I'm +217:29
stephenfinif gouthamr can take a look we can probably send that into the gate17:29
stephenfinI've +W'd https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/97081817:29
SilviaWachira[m]stephenfin: Thank you!17:30
opendevreviewGireesh Awasthi proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Specs for share server replica  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/98849518:29
opendevreviewGireesh Awasthi proposed openstack/manila-specs master: Specs for share server replica  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-specs/+/98849518:35
SilviaWachira[m]stephenfin, I rebased the stack to resolve the merge conflicts after 970818 merged, but only realized after pushing that the rebase cleared your +2 votes on 970819–970822. I didn't know that would happen, sorry about that. If you have a moment before you go on leave, could you re-+2 those patches? Zuul is currently re-running on all of them.19:18
stephenfinSilviaWachira[m]: I can except you seem to have mistakenly reintroduced some old changes in the process https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/970819/24..2619:19
stephenfinSilviaWachira[m]: mind if I just fix up?19:19
SilviaWachira[m]stephenfin: Please go ahead, thank you!19:20
stephenfindone19:31
stephenfinSilviaWachira[m]: In general, I would advise you to use the `-f` option for git-review19:32
stephenfinThat will delete your local copy of the code. When you are working on it next, you can re-download it using `git review -d`19:32
gouthamr++19:33
stephenfinThis ensures there is only one "source of truth", and you don't end up e.g. accidentally overwriting changes from others19:33
stephenfinSilviaWachira[m]: Additionally, if you want to get an older patchset (revision) of a change (like I just did, where I wanted PS24 for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/970819) you can append the patchset after the change number19:34
stephenfinSo e.g. `git review -d 970819,24` or `git review -x 970819,24`19:34
SilviaWachira[m]stephenfin: Thank you so much for fixing this and for the tips, Stephen!19:36

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!