| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/manila master: Add Everpure FlashArray driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/795180 | 00:10 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Add cold migration tests for virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/989634 | 00:19 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Add cold migration tests for virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/989634 | 00:22 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Add cold migration tests for virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/989634 | 00:23 |
| opendevreview | Inyong Hong proposed openstack/python-manilaclient master: Add availability_zone filter to share list (2.97) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/998703 | 00:40 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Refactor option handling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/987445 | 01:11 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Drop direct reference to [identity] auth_version option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/986039 | 01:19 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/manila master: Remove [DEFAULT] use_forwarded_for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/981899 | 01:20 |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/manila master: Add Everpure FlashArray driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/795180 | 02:03 |
| opendevreview | Medha Choudhary netapp proposed openstack/manila master: netapp: fix share server creation when a cluster node is down https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1001280 | 04:23 |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/manila master: Add Everpure FlashArray driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/795180 | 04:33 |
| opendevreview | Siddharth Kumar proposed openstack/manila master: Dell PowerScale: Add QoS support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/976101 | 05:52 |
| opendevreview | Medha Choudhary netapp proposed openstack/manila master: NetApp: Fix SVM DR share server migration for REST client https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002585 | 06:08 |
| opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Drop direct reference to [identity] auth_version option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/986039 | 06:27 |
| opendevreview | Siddharth Kumar proposed openstack/manila master: Add core support for asynchronous revert-to-snapshot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1001109 | 06:34 |
| opendevreview | Medha Choudhary netapp proposed openstack/manila master: netapp: fix share server creation when a cluster node is down https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1001280 | 07:03 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-manilaclient stable/2026.1: Fix resource lock project and user filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/1002567 | 09:56 |
| opendevreview | Nikita Skakun proposed openstack/manila master: Share replicas inherit mount_point_name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/999836 | 10:21 |
| opendevreview | kiran pawar proposed openstack/manila master: Add skip_scheduler parameter to migration_start API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/985679 | 10:52 |
| opendevreview | Kumar Tadepalli proposed openstack/manila master: [NetApp] Enhance Share workflows to support Share server replication https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/996629 | 11:12 |
| opendevreview | Medha Choudhary netapp proposed openstack/manila master: NetApp ONTAP: REST-based CG snapshot lifecycle for share groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/994884 | 11:29 |
| opendevreview | Simon Dodsley proposed openstack/manila master: Add Everpure FlashArray driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/795180 | 11:30 |
| opendevreview | Medha Choudhary netapp proposed openstack/manila master: db: skip share instances with no instance in share group query https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002631 | 11:35 |
| opendevreview | Medha Choudhary netapp proposed openstack/manila master: db: skip share instances with no instance in share group query https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002631 | 11:42 |
| opendevreview | Nikita Skakun proposed openstack/manila master: Share replicas inherit mount_point_name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/999836 | 11:48 |
| opendevreview | Medha Choudhary netapp proposed openstack/manila master: netapp: fix share server creation when a cluster node is down https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1001280 | 11:58 |
| opendevreview | Medha Choudhary netapp proposed openstack/manila master: NetApp: Fix SVM DR share server migration for REST client https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002585 | 11:59 |
| opendevreview | Gireesh Awasthi proposed openstack/python-manilaclient master: Added python manila client for share server replica https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/994502 | 12:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-manilaclient master: Add availability_zone filter to share list (2.97) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/998703 | 12:20 |
| opendevreview | Gireesh Awasthi proposed openstack/manila master: Added Share Server Replica Support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/993501 | 12:21 |
| opendevreview | Sanketh Shetty proposed openstack/manila master: NetApp : Custom IP of Share Server (DHSS=True) is not getting deleted with REST API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002640 | 12:38 |
| opendevreview | Sanketh Shetty proposed openstack/manila master: NetApp : Custom ipspace of Share Server (DHSS=True) is not getting deleted with REST API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002640 | 12:40 |
| opendevreview | kiran pawar proposed openstack/manila master: Add skip_scheduler parameter to migration_start API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/985679 | 13:14 |
| opendevreview | Nikita Skakun proposed openstack/manila master: Fix inconsistent driver-updatable metadata delete https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1000846 | 13:42 |
| opendevreview | Nikita Skakun proposed openstack/manila master: Fix inconsistent driver-updatable metadata delete https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1000846 | 13:43 |
| opendevreview | Nikita Skakun proposed openstack/manila master: Fix inconsistent driver-updatable metadata delete https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1000846 | 13:45 |
| opendevreview | Sanketh Shetty proposed openstack/manila master: NetApp : Custom ipspace of Share Server (DHSS=True) is not getting deleted with REST API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002640 | 13:57 |
| opendevreview | Yaron Bar proposed openstack/manila master: Add Weka share driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/989998 | 14:07 |
| opendevreview | Sanketh Shetty proposed openstack/manila master: NetApp : Custom ipspace of Share Server (DHSS=True) is not getting deleted with REST API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002640 | 15:01 |
| opendevreview | Sanketh Shetty proposed openstack/manila master: NetApp - Add support for SnapMirror Active Sync(SM-as) for NAS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/991844 | 15:25 |
| carloss | gireesh Anoop_Shukla I'd like to reiterate gouthamr's questionon how important is it to have the client implementation land in Hibiscus? | 16:04 |
| srinesh[m] | Hi carloss gouthamr Wanted to check on HPE Snapshot changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/992850. Have addressed review comments, is it okay for merge or we need to get an FFE for this release. | 16:04 |
| carloss | srinesh[m]: thank you for bringing it up - I think we're close on this change | 16:05 |
| gouthamr | srinesh[m]: ack, looking | 16:05 |
| carthaca | carloss: re 'how important is it to have the client implementation land in Hibiscus' - I think we had the expectation that we have the API available this year (2026), if that is still possible with early Indri, that should still be good | 16:05 |
| gouthamr | srinesh[m]: no FFE needed, i think i'm halfway past the stack | 16:05 |
| srinesh[m] | thanks gouthamr carloss | 16:05 |
| carloss | carthaca: ack, thank you | 16:06 |
| gouthamr | gireesh: manideep Kumar_T SankethShetty: you folks that have put in a ton of work on the server replication changes so i understand it's disappointing when you hit the wall on a deadline.. however, i'd like you to take a project maintainers' perspective on this.. what gives us confidence that an API that's shipped wouldn't break? NetApp CI can't be the only gate for this - although it is necessary.. | 16:06 |
| gouthamr | that's why a reference driver is important. if it isn't tested in the OpenStack CI/gate, it's broken | 16:07 |
| gouthamr | we've been bitten a bit badly when we violated that rule | 16:07 |
| Anoop_Shukla | We would love to see it go in Hibiscus as we need to focus on other areas next TBF. But if we need more confidence building on the patches, and SAP folks are okay, I am okay as well to get it in early Indri.. | 16:09 |
| Kumar_T | ++ | 16:10 |
| gireesh | ++ | 16:10 |
| kpdev | @gouthamr is it possible to have exception and continue getting manila side work merged ? | 16:11 |
| carloss | ++ it's clear how much hard work went into it all | 16:11 |
| gouthamr | kpdev: sure, if that's what you folks want.. i'm away tomorrow and Monday.. but i will try and post comments on gireesh's change. i'd like to know if the FFE is approved though? if it isn't, i can defer acting to next week | 16:13 |
| Anoop_Shukla | Thanks for the ack Carlos! Yes..it has been a great effort right from the design to the impl! Commendable work done IMO.. | 16:13 |
| kpdev | My concern is if we move to I release, the work may get sidelined. Since its ongoing and many engineers are working on it, we better make it exception. IMHO | 16:15 |
| carloss | kpdev gireesh I'm in for approving the FFE if: | 16:15 |
| carloss | 1. you folks want to try and feel we can get it done | 16:15 |
| carloss | 2. if you're committed and feel comfortable on getting the testing done with the containter driver by next Thursday | 16:15 |
| kpdev | there are some issues with container driver and gouthamr suggested to get that merged. Are those patches merged ? | 16:16 |
| carloss | kpdev: container driver has been passing lately | 16:17 |
| carloss | gouthamr: did a bunch of changes to get it healthy | 16:17 |
| carloss | so CI is green | 16:18 |
| gireesh | From NetApp point of view we made all the changes and we are confident on our patches, even we have regress testing cycle | 16:18 |
| carloss | kpdev: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=manila-tempest-plugin-container&project=openstack/manila | 16:18 |
| kpdev | this is WIP PR I had created 3 weeks ago, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/999135 | 16:18 |
| carthaca | I'm not very familiar with the container driver, but I think we need some architectural decision how it should look like, should it implement a real replication across two hosts or just shared storage with distinct compute representing the share server replicas or something inbetween? | 16:19 |
| gouthamr | the replication underneath would be possible if we used zfsonlinux as the backend - but that's probably heavy lifting | 16:20 |
| gouthamr | s/as backend/as the backing store | 16:20 |
| kpdev | yes, there is knowledge gap w.r.t. container driver for us | 16:21 |
| kpdev | can you add comments on PR and help to make it better. | 16:21 |
| gouthamr | have you run it against the tempest tests manideep's proposing | 16:22 |
| carloss | kpdev: container CI is green on the change you shared - if all the changes implemented there are ready, maybe the tests implemented in manila-tempest-plugin could be run there? | 16:22 |
| * carloss was out-typed by gouthamr :) | 16:23 | |
| carloss | > yes, there is knowledge gap w.r.t. container driver for us | 16:24 |
| carloss | I think for most of us honestly... I remember needing to go write some code to it from time to time | 16:24 |
| kpdev | so. manila-tempest-plugin PR needs to run with depends-on of container PR. is it ? | 16:24 |
| carloss | kpdev: best way possibly is to create a new change in Manila that depends on the core, tempest and container and enables the tests for the container driver | 16:26 |
| kpdev | ok, can you review the change meanwhile | 16:28 |
| carloss | I can share an example to be a starting point, gimme 2 mins | 16:28 |
| kpdev | @carloss: container driver is non-voting, I dont think its blocker for merging the changes as long as separate netapp CI is working. | 16:32 |
| opendevreview | Carlos Eduardo proposed openstack/manila master: DNM Test Container Driver Share server replication https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002664 | 16:32 |
| carloss | kpdev: the blocker is the reference implementation in this case, kpdev | 16:32 |
| carloss | oops, double tagging, my bad | 16:33 |
| carloss | kpdev: please take a look at the change I just submitted | 16:33 |
| kpdev | please check container driver PR and suggest are reference implementation is what you want. What I have created is based on my assumption, but unless we agree on what we want as a reference the CI runs are of no use. | 16:34 |
| carloss | and I think you'll need it to depend on another change that enables the tests for the container driver job | 16:34 |
| kpdev | which another change are you referring ? the PR you created consider both container driver and tempest. | 16:36 |
| gouthamr | are we talking past each other? carloss is pointing out that your reference implementation must be tested against the tempest changes - can that happen in parallel to the review? | 16:38 |
| kpdev | yes, but first we need to agree on container driver implementation. So as soon as I have some reviews and confirmation on existing implementation is ok, I will continue running with tempest changes. | 16:39 |
| gouthamr | the tests will tell you some of that | 16:39 |
| kpdev | ok I will update driver based on latest changes of interfaces and trigger CI. | 16:41 |
| opendevreview | kiran pawar proposed openstack/manila master: container driver: add share server replica support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/999135 | 16:51 |
| opendevreview | Sailaja Mada proposed openstack/manila master: Manila NetApp Driver UT enhancements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002675 | 17:39 |
| carloss | gireesh kpdev Anoop_Shukla late ping for you, sorry - I wanted to let you know that I'll be sending an email granting an FFE for some changes, including share server replication | 17:58 |
| carloss | so let's see how the testing and reviews go | 17:58 |
| carloss | if it is getting in, the feature must merge by next Thursday so we have enough time for testing and stabilizing the CI | 17:59 |
| carloss | if it does not make it, we should target the feature to the beginning of the Indri cycle | 18:01 |
| carloss | kpdev gireesh Anoop_Shukla manideep SankethShetty Kumar_T I wanted to reiterate that your hard work on this feature is commendable and much appreciated and your efforts are appreciated by the community | 18:05 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/manila master: Share replicas inherit mount_point_name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/999836 | 18:11 |
| *** Unknown123 is now known as Mike-- | 18:19 | |
| vhari | hello NetApp team, sharing this blocking bug here since we skipped triage today, https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2164972, ptal ty | 18:20 |
| opendevreview | Manideep proposed openstack/manila-tempest-plugin master: Add tempest tests for share server replication workflows https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila-tempest-plugin/+/998360 | 18:22 |
| gouthamr | vhari: critical? what happened here? | 18:23 |
| gouthamr | vhari: i mean, its an experimental feature medha_ seems to be testing against ONTAP.. i'd not triage it as critical | 18:24 |
| gouthamr | most driver-only bugs rarely bubble over "medium".. critical would mean we stop doing anything and get that thing resolved :) | 18:24 |
| gouthamr | looks like medha_ is working on a fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002585 | 18:25 |
| gouthamr | she would need to edit the commit message and add the bug reference to it if that's the case | 18:25 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/manila master: Use native threading by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/997148 | 18:45 |
| carloss | it blocks the workflows, yes and I agree if that happens it has a higher priority | 19:00 |
| carloss | I kinda forgot that is an experimental feature yet, so makes sense it not being critical | 19:00 |
| carloss | fix is appreciated | 19:01 |
| gouthamr | and for the NetApp driver, REST isn’t default yet? | 19:13 |
| carloss | iirc, it is for driver assisted | 19:16 |
| carloss | s/driver assisted/driver enhanced | 19:17 |
| carloss | but for the old migration (replicate, promote, bring up again) - no | 19:17 |
| opendevreview | Manideep proposed openstack/manila master: Added Share Server Replica Support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/993501 | 19:22 |
| *** Unknown123 is now known as Mike-- | 19:43 | |
| opendevreview | Sailaja Mada proposed openstack/manila master: Manila NetApp Driver UT enhancements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/1002675 | 20:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!