Monday, 2015-12-21

*** salv-orlando has quit IRC00:03
*** markvoelker has quit IRC00:04
*** hogepodge has quit IRC00:16
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-300:17
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-300:17
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-300:22
*** hogepodge has quit IRC00:27
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-300:27
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC00:32
*** piet has quit IRC00:35
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-300:35
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC00:36
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-300:38
*** mbound_ has quit IRC00:40
*** piet has quit IRC00:40
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-300:41
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-300:43
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-300:43
*** neil_ has joined #openstack-meeting-300:48
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-300:48
*** neiljerram has quit IRC00:50
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC00:53
*** neil_ has quit IRC00:53
*** piet has quit IRC00:57
*** dslevin_ has quit IRC01:02
*** dims has quit IRC01:02
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-301:03
*** sdake has quit IRC01:04
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-301:05
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting-301:06
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-301:09
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-301:09
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-meeting-301:09
*** markvoelker has quit IRC01:10
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC01:14
*** armax has quit IRC01:15
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-301:16
*** stanzgy has joined #openstack-meeting-301:16
*** vahidh has quit IRC01:20
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-301:22
*** piet has quit IRC01:27
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-301:29
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC01:33
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-301:37
*** mbound_ has joined #openstack-meeting-301:41
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-301:41
*** mbound_ has quit IRC01:46
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-301:50
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-301:53
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC01:54
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-302:07
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-302:10
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:12
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC02:14
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-302:27
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC02:31
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-302:36
*** woodster_ has quit IRC02:36
*** markvoelker has quit IRC02:40
*** sdake_ has quit IRC02:47
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-302:47
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC02:52
*** piet has quit IRC02:57
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-303:08
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC03:13
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck03:13
*** coolsvap|away is now known as coolsvap03:23
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-303:26
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC03:30
*** dims has quit IRC03:32
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|away03:33
*** coolsvap|away is now known as coolsvap03:40
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-303:46
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC03:51
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-304:07
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC04:12
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-304:26
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC04:30
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-304:37
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:37
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-304:38
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck04:40
*** markvoelker has quit IRC04:41
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:43
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck04:46
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-304:53
*** Poornima has joined #openstack-meeting-304:57
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:58
*** bharathm has joined #openstack-meeting-305:00
*** annp has quit IRC05:00
*** bharathm has quit IRC05:08
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-305:10
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-305:16
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC05:21
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-305:21
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-305:26
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-305:31
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC05:31
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-305:47
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-305:50
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC05:51
*** julim has quit IRC05:56
*** dedery has joined #openstack-meeting-306:18
*** ifat_afek has joined #openstack-meeting-306:19
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-306:27
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC06:32
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck06:32
*** hdaniel has joined #openstack-meeting-306:36
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-306:48
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC06:52
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-306:53
*** amotoki has quit IRC06:59
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-307:06
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-307:10
*** dslevin_ has quit IRC07:11
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:21
*** hdaniel has quit IRC07:23
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-307:25
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-307:25
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC07:29
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-307:30
*** irenab has quit IRC07:31
*** tmazur has joined #openstack-meeting-307:35
*** vahidh has quit IRC07:39
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-307:46
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC07:50
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-308:00
*** dslevin_ has quit IRC08:05
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-308:11
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-308:12
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC08:14
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-308:14
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-308:15
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-meeting-308:15
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-308:26
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC08:31
*** baohua has joined #openstack-meeting-308:35
*** itxaka has joined #openstack-meeting-308:37
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-308:47
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC08:51
*** kzaitsev1mb has joined #openstack-meeting-308:53
*** mbound_ has joined #openstack-meeting-308:53
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-308:54
*** baohua has quit IRC08:57
*** dslevin_ has quit IRC08:59
*** kzaitsev1mb has quit IRC09:00
*** ifat_afek has quit IRC09:02
*** ifat_afek has joined #openstack-meeting-309:03
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-309:05
*** JeanBriceCombebi has joined #openstack-meeting-309:08
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-309:12
*** tmazur has quit IRC09:15
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-309:25
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:25
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC09:31
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-309:34
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:36
*** hdaniel has joined #openstack-meeting-309:37
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-315:36
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack15:36
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC15:37
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting-315:47
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting-315:48
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-315:50
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:53
*** JeanBriceCombebi has joined #openstack-meeting-315:53
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:54
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-315:54
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-315:54
*** vkmc is now known as vkmc-afk15:54
*** mfranc213 has quit IRC15:56
*** vgridnev has quit IRC15:56
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-316:00
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-316:00
*** lblanchard has quit IRC16:01
*** vhoward has quit IRC16:01
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:02
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting-316:02
*** vsaienko has joined #openstack-meeting-316:02
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-316:02
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-316:02
*** sdake_ has quit IRC16:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:03
*** vgridnev has quit IRC16:05
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-316:07
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC16:09
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting-316:10
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-316:11
*** JeanBriceCombebi has quit IRC16:13
*** gcb has quit IRC16:24
*** stevemar_znc is now known as stevemar16:28
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-316:34
*** vkmc-afk is now known as vkmc16:34
*** reed has quit IRC16:36
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting-316:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:38
*** vhoward has quit IRC16:42
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-316:43
*** stendulker has joined #openstack-meeting-316:44
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck16:45
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC16:46
*** markvoelker has quit IRC16:48
*** dtantsur has joined #openstack-meeting-316:50
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-316:50
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting-316:50
*** dedery has quit IRC16:51
*** ihrachys has quit IRC16:52
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-316:55
*** rloo has joined #openstack-meeting-316:58
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-317:00
*** mgould has joined #openstack-meeting-317:00
jrollhelloooooo17:00
jroll#startmeeting ironic17:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Dec 21 17:00:20 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jroll. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: ironic)"17:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'ironic'17:00
vdroko/17:00
dtantsuro/17:00
mgouldo/17:00
jrollis anyone actually here today?17:00
stendulkero/17:00
*** lucasagomes has joined #openstack-meeting-317:00
jrollhooray, we have people17:00
jrollso as always the agenda is here:17:01
jroll#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic#Agenda_for_next_meeting17:01
lucasagomes:-)17:01
jroll#topic Announcements and reminders17:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements and reminders (Meeting topic: ironic)"17:01
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-317:01
jrollI have nothing here; does anyone else?17:01
rloohi17:01
dtantsurgate is still half-broken \o/17:01
jroll/o\17:01
rloojroll: any status wrt gate?17:01
jrollit isn't great.17:01
rloosigh. should we do 'recheck's or ?17:01
dtantsurinspector gate is broken too, but by another cause17:01
rloojroll: is it due to cleaning or something else? (the ironic gate)17:02
jrollhere's the latest graph http://tinyurl.com/jqzpjl517:02
*** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-meeting-317:02
jrollit's due to nested virt being super slow17:02
lucasagomeswe've bumped the timeout to 900 but still very inconsistent17:02
mgouldwow, that's a lot of failures17:02
TheJuliao/17:02
rlooalthough it seems to be getting 'better' the past day...17:03
lucasagomesmaybe some immediate changes would be to disable some tests such as rebuild and/or cleaning17:03
*** gutbuster has left #openstack-meeting-317:03
lucasagomesuntil we sort everything out17:03
dtantsurlucasagomes, that was my thought too17:03
jrollrloo: yeah, I think it's improved slightly17:03
lucasagomesofc it will lower or coverage17:03
lucasagomesour*17:03
jrollrebuild is probably the biggest win there17:03
lucasagomesyeah17:03
jrollI also have this to disable cleaning temporarily https://review.openstack.org/25904617:04
lucasagomesbecause with rebuild we are basically deploying it twice17:04
dtantsurshould/can we move rebuild to a separate non-voting job?17:04
dtantsurit's unlikely we'll break it too often17:04
*** numans has quit IRC17:04
jrollwe could yeah17:04
lucasagomesyeah17:04
*** hdaniel has quit IRC17:04
dtantsurjroll, I'd say keep cleaning, but remove rebuild.. cause cleaning is something everyone uses17:04
lucasagomesI wonder if we have a way to test those stuff more directly, like starting with a active node and rebuilding it17:05
lucasagomesinstead of going trhough the whole deploy + rebuild process17:05
lucasagomessame for cleaning17:05
jrolllucasagomes: ++17:05
lucasagomesbut that's fft17:05
jrolland split those tests out17:05
lucasagomesyes17:05
jrollfft?17:05
lucasagomesfood for thought17:05
jrolloh yeah17:05
jrollit's a good idea17:05
dtantsuryeah...17:05
*** itxaka has quit IRC17:05
jrollwe need TheJulia's feature here :)17:05
lucasagomes++17:06
jrollhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/238904/17:06
rloowell, besides fft. I'm hungry; what do we do now-ish?17:06
lucasagomesthe tinyipa is also a good promess, but currently it's installing (cached) the IPA dependencies at boot time17:06
rlooshould we disable cleaning for now? jroll's patch?17:06
lucasagomesand it's *very* slow in a nested VM17:06
lucasagomeslike took me 10 min on local tests17:06
TheJuliajroll: I've been slack on revising it, I'll do the required rewrite at this point sometime tomorrow17:06
* mgould was wondering what Fast Fourier Transforms had to do with this :-)17:07
dtantsurmgould++17:07
lucasagomesif we can install everything at image build time, and at boot time just activate the venv and run IPA I bet it would be real quick17:07
jrollrloo: dtantsur: I think disabling rebuild might be the right thing to do here, however that's a tempest patch and might take time to get through during the holidays17:07
dtantsurjroll, we can do both things and revert the cleaning patch asap17:07
jrolldtantsur: sure, that works17:08
rloojroll, what dtantsur said ++17:08
lucasagomesjroll, what if we add the tempest patch and some dummy patches in Ironic with depends-on17:08
jrollok, I'll un-wip that I guess17:08
lucasagomesjust to see if it will help out17:08
lucasagomeslike a couple of rechecks there to verify17:08
*** devananda has quit IRC17:08
jrolllucasagomes: sure, that doesn't help get tempest reviewers on it17:08
lucasagomesyeah, but helps out with data17:08
jrollmhm17:08
rloojroll: although jenkins didn't like your disable-cleaning patch :-(17:09
*** siva has joined #openstack-meeting-317:09
jrollrloo: I just rebased it17:09
rloojroll: ok, here's hoping...17:09
jrollrloo: it was the bashate thing17:09
*** siva is now known as Guest6626317:09
jrolldtantsur: can you do the tempest rebuild patch?17:09
dtantsurjroll, sure.. just delete the code for now, right? or make a configuration defaulting to false?17:10
jrolldtantsur: either way, I'm not opinionated17:10
jrollwe need to get that stuff in our tree17:10
rlooif it is 'as easy', i'd say add a config. just in case we want it.17:11
Guest66263sambetts: regarding #213262, do you have any link to the out of tree implementation of the functions you had mentioned?17:11
dtantsurrloo++17:11
* dtantsur clones tempest17:11
jrollokay, any other announcements?17:11
jrollmoving on...17:12
rloojroll: do you want to mention rfe bugs or leave that to email?17:12
jrollrloo: go for it17:12
rlooforget it, i think it was going to be via email17:12
jrollheh17:12
jrollquick note, we're using RFE bugs instead of blueprints now17:12
jrollread your email for more info :)17:13
rloooh, but vdrok moved all bps to rfe bugs so a big applause and thank you17:13
jroll++ thanks vdrok!17:13
vdroknp :)17:13
jroll#topic subteam status updates17:13
*** openstack changes topic to "subteam status updates (Meeting topic: ironic)"17:13
krotschecko/17:13
jrollas always, these are here:17:13
jroll#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard17:13
mgouldvdrok++17:13
jrollI'll give folks a moment to update^W look over those17:14
rloodtantsur: wishlist isn't necessarily rfe's, right?17:14
*** mari0jv has joined #openstack-meeting-317:15
dtantsurrloo, right, but it's much easier to implement17:15
*** devananda has joined #openstack-meeting-317:15
dtantsurso I decided it's close enough17:15
jrollwell, fixing a bug should never be a "wishlist" item17:15
* dtantsur does not like launchpad API17:15
jrollso all wishlist things should be features17:15
dtantsur++17:15
rloojroll: ok, but not all wishlists require specs :)17:16
dtantsurnot RFE's as well :)17:16
jroll^17:16
*** woodster_ has quit IRC17:16
rlooso they are features but not rfe's.17:16
rloonot necessarily rfe's.17:17
jrollnot necessarily *tagged* as rfe17:17
* krotscheck is back from vacation, so things are starting up again.17:17
*** primeministerp has quit IRC17:17
jrollbut any feature request is a "request for enhancement"17:17
jrollright?17:17
vdrokI think it is17:17
rlooso what should be tagged as rfe?17:17
lucasagomessounds like17:17
jrollany bug that is a feature request17:18
rloowhat's the diff between a 'feature' and a 'feature request'?17:18
jrolla feature is code?17:18
jrollwords are hard17:18
rlooyeah, just want it to be somewhat clear so we know.17:18
jrollwhen we're talking about a bug report, anything that is a feature request/submission, and not a bug, is a 'feature'17:18
vdrokI guess we're moving to the next topic :)17:19
dtantsurrloo, RFE is when a person asks for a feature, but does not want to implement it17:19
lucasagomesvdrok, ++17:19
rloobut there are lots of rfes where people want to implement it17:19
dtantsurrloo, if a person wants to submit code right now, it's already not an RFE, but we also count them as RFE for simplicity17:19
*** piet has quit IRC17:19
dtantsurthat's how I understand it17:19
devanandadtantsur: I would say, RFE includes when someone proposes code -- they're requesting that we accept the feature into mainline.17:19
jrollit is an RFE, but they're also deciding to implement it themselves17:19
jrolldevananda++17:19
rlooso what can be a 'feature' that isn't tagged as an rfe?17:20
devanandaso the "feature request" is the request they made, and the "implementation" of that RFE is the code they proposed17:20
jrollrloo: nothing IMO17:20
dtantsurrloo, looks like nothing17:20
devanandarloo: something we already implemented and accepted into trunk?17:20
devanandalike "feature X" was included in the Kilo release17:20
dtantsurwell, something like "refactor the docs" might be wishlist, but not RFE17:20
rlooso to go back to our bug tracking system, the features are indicated in the bug system as 'wishlist'.17:21
dtantsurcause it's not a feature in ironic17:21
dtantsurbut dunno17:21
jrollthis is all a question of reporting, right?17:21
jrollfor now, wishlist is close enough to RFE for me.17:21
rloobut we are distinguishing bugs - 'wishlist' as some being tagged with rfe and others not.17:21
jrollin the future we can improve that17:21
jrollit's a transition period17:21
rlooif 'wishlist' should all be rfe's, then there's no need to tag them.17:22
lucasagomesrloo, I tend to agree with ruby here17:22
rlooor even prepend with 'RFE' ?17:22
lucasagomesjust use what it's already there17:22
vdrokrloo, e.g. there is a bug about possibility to run tests under mac, it is a wishlist but not rfe17:22
dtantsuras I said above, wishlist items not necessary feature in ironic, might be something like "refactor tests"17:22
jrollwell, look at my comments on the docs change17:22
devanandadtantsur: ++17:22
jrollI propose a 'rfe-approved' tag like neutron uses17:22
jrollin which case the tags *are* useful17:23
rloojroll: so do all wishlists need a 'rfe-approved' tag?17:23
jrollrloo: no.....17:23
rloowe can take this discussion elsewhere, i'm just a bit confused probably17:23
jrollall approved RFEs get that tag17:23
jrollall unapproved get the 'rfe' tag17:23
vdrokso here is what I concluded from discussions in doc patch and irc17:24
devanandarloo: I think I'm confused too, fwiw17:24
vdrok1. create an rfe bug, in new state, wishlist priority, set assignee if possible;17:24
vdrok2. someone from ironic-drivers should move it to confirmed state to show the idea is valid (or change the tag to rfe-approved?);17:24
vdrok3. you can add code right away before waiting for approval, if a spec is needed, code will be -2'ed;17:24
vdrok4. if the feature is not needed a bug will be moved to won't fix and spec/code -2'ed.17:24
lucasagomesrloo, same here17:24
rloobut dtansur's example of a wishlist to 'refactor tests' is not a rfe? (i think it should be but if it isn't) how do folks now it isn't and doesn't require rfe-approved?17:24
vdrokthis is for feature requests^17:24
dtantsurrloo, test refactoring is not a feature IMO17:25
rloodtantsur: seems like a feature of our infrastructure, but regardless, let's say it isn't a feature.17:25
rloodtantsur: but it is a 'wishlist' bug. so I see a patch that addresses that bug.17:25
mgould"feature" usually implies "user-visible", IMO17:26
rloodtantsur: how do i know whether it needs a rfe-approved tag before +A'ing it?17:26
jrollrloo: because the bug triager will tag it as 'rfe'17:26
mgould"request for enhancement" could mean almost anything17:26
rloojroll: but what is the absence of a rfe tag mean? that the bug triager forgot to tag it? how do i know that it shouldn't be rfe?17:27
lucasagomesmgould, yeah, I see it that way too17:27
jrollrloo: well, you could decide that for yourself, or look at the history and see if it's been triaged, and ask17:27
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-317:27
jrollrloo: common sense and such17:28
vdrokjroll, ++17:28
rlooit isn't really a new question. even with BPs, i've seen bugs in the past that seemed to be features in disguise.17:28
jrollrloo: yep, this makes it easier to handle those features17:28
jrollrloo: I've been trying to watch for those and ask for BPs instead, but didn't do a good job17:29
rlooso 'common sense' to me meant asking whether it should be a bp/spec, but clearly it wasn't common sense to some others. or my common sense radar is off :)17:29
devanandathis is an ever-ongoing debate -- is X a bug or a feature? -- and we'll never have an answer that works for everyone, because it is subjective17:29
rloodevananda: right. and now that we have them 'bundled' into the bugs/wishlist, i wonder if things will get muddier. i guess we'll see...17:29
devanandarloo: but I would suggest you use this test: is the behavior being reported clearly NOT the intended behavior? if so, it's clearly a bug.17:30
dtantsurthings were like that already, people filed pretty a lot of wishlist items and bugs like "X does not support Y"17:30
devanandaand then we err on the side of caution and tag things which are in the grey zone as RFE's17:31
devananda*and either we ...17:31
devanandaor we just leave them as wishlist items17:31
jrollfunny store, I just realized this was the one agenda item17:33
rloook, if something is unclear, i'll bring it up. i'd actually prefer if the wishlist items had a comment saying 'rfe not needed' and they default to rfe, but anyway.17:33
lucasagomesmaybe we just need to say: bugs or enhancement... e.g If it's fixing something it's a bug. Anything else is an enhancement: adding a new feature, fixing docs, refactoring tests17:33
lucasagomesand then in the ehancements we can say what need a spec and what not17:34
lucasagomeslike docs, tests refactor etc don't need one... but things affects multiple areas of the project does need it17:34
lucasagomesthen we can decide how to distinguish it in the bug tracker, either using the tags or wishlist17:35
dtantsurwell, wishlist == RFE gives us a simpler procedure17:35
*** iyamahat has quit IRC17:36
lucasagomesright17:37
vdrokso, should we start with rfe/rfe-approved tags, or just wishlist bugs?17:37
lucasagomesI think we first need to decide whether we are tracking: bugs, features and others enhancements... or just bugs and enhancements (if that makes sense)17:38
dtantsurwishlist + [RFE] in title to help triagers to understand the intent?17:38
rloovdrok: i thought it was 'wishlist-no tags', 'wishlist-rfe tag' -> 'wishlist-rfe-approved tag'.17:38
rloodoes rfe-approved mean either spec is approved or no spec is needed, and description in bug is sufficient?17:38
mgouldrloo, +1 to that idea17:39
vdrokI think rfe-approved means that idea is valid, if there needs to be a spec the code can just be -2ed17:39
vdrokor it can be written in bug comments17:39
rloolucasagomes: i think we want to track enhancements, just that there seems to be 2? types; ones that need detailed (spec) description, others that don't?17:40
rloovdrok: OH. rfe-approved == 'this is approved to be classified as an rfe'?17:40
vdrokrloo, thats what I thought initially, but it can be whatever we decide :)17:41
jrollO_O17:41
jrollrfe-approved == spec is approved, or no spec required17:41
jroll'ready to land the code'17:41
lucasagomesrloo, right, but what confuses me is the tagged/non-tagged17:41
rloojroll: that's what I thought it should mean :)17:42
mgoulddo we have to use these tags, or can we create "spec-needed" and "has-enough-spec" tags for clarity?17:42
jrollso17:42
jrollwe're trying to mirror what neutron did17:42
jrollbecause it works well for them17:42
jrollI think we should start there and see how it goes17:42
jrolland change things as needed17:42
vdrokIn either case (a spec being required or not), once the discussion has happened and there is positive consensus on the RFE, the report is ‘approved’, and its tag will move from ‘rfe’ to ‘rfe-approved’.17:42
mgouldOK17:42
vdrokbut yes, we can make it our own way17:43
jrollthat is here fwiw http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/blueprints.html#neutron-request-for-feature-enhancements17:43
mgouldjroll, so the answer to "what does tag X mean" should be "whatever Neutron currently means by it" for now?17:43
jrollmgould: well, we're working on documenting it in our docs17:43
jrollbut I'd like to model those from neutron's model17:43
rloovdrok: but how is there a discussion/positive consensus on an rfe if there is no spec/not clear that the bug/wishlist needs a discussion etc?17:44
jrollminus the BP junk17:44
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-317:44
rloojroll: i'm a bit hesitant to 'just' do what neutron did if it isn't clear how it works. if it is clear to some of you then fine. if it isn't, then it seems better to think about it now, than to confuse us all later with more change.17:44
vdrokrloo, someone from ironic-drivers decide that the idea is valid, it is a new feature indeed, and adds rfe-approved and says this requires a spec/can be implemented as is17:45
jrollrloo: sure, we should be clear on it, and it shuold be agreed17:45
*** vahidh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:45
rlooand the 'ironic-drivers' thing is another thing...17:45
jrollrloo: I just don't like stalling for days while we're in the middle of a process change :|17:45
rloovdrok: but jroll just said rfe-approved == spec is approved17:45
jrollrloo: yeah, reading again maybe I read that wrong :/17:46
rlooi think mgould? mentioned 'spec-needed', 'spec-approved' might be clearer for me/us.17:46
vdrokor maybe i did ^)17:46
devanandarloo: ironic-drivers isn't the team which sets bug tags, priority, etc. that is ironic-bugs17:46
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck17:46
devanandahowever, neutron uses a closed bug team and (so far) we do not17:46
devanandaso with this change, perhaps we should be17:47
rloodevananda: yeah, i know. we can discuss that later. ironic-drivers to me means people resp for the drivers part of ironic!17:47
devanandarloo: heh, well, that's not what it is.17:47
jroll$project-drivers historically in openstack means the people driving the project direction17:47
jrolland has always meant that for us, as well17:48
devanandaxxx-drivers are the launchpad teams which "own" projects, set milestones, create releases, and manage the projects' front page on LP17:48
rloojroll, devananda: OH. that explains it.17:48
jroll:)17:48
rloodrivers is overloaded. too much :-(17:48
*** vahidh has quit IRC17:48
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:49
*** markvoelker has quit IRC17:49
rlooso we need to agree on *how* to handle bug/wishlist stuff, and *who* can manage that process17:49
devanandarloo: yes17:50
rloos/agree/describe/ :)17:50
jrollyep17:50
jrolllet me write a clear proposal this week17:50
jrollon the emails17:50
devananda++ to emails17:50
rloook, action item for jroll! thx!17:50
lucasagomesML ++17:50
* rloo looks at rest of subteam reports :)17:50
devanandaI'd suggest we not change the launchpad teams' membership or access rights too much until we're all clear on what the direction will be17:50
jrollwell, I've added specs cores to ironic-drivers17:51
jrollwhich I think is accurate regardless17:51
*** Guest66263 has quit IRC17:52
rloojroll: i'm not sure of that. you trust me to set milestones and create releases? :D17:52
jrollrloo: yep, deal with it :)17:52
*** tellesnobrega_af is now known as tellesnobrega17:52
jrollrloo: oh, and manage blueprints, the best part17:52
lucasagomeslol17:52
rloojroll: no worries. blueprints are DEAD!17:52
dtantsur:D17:52
jroll\o/17:52
rlooi'm good with the rest of the subteam reports. sorry i digressed from that.17:53
jrollit's okay, you covered the only topic we had ;)17:53
jrollI don't see anything crazy there17:53
* jroll moved topics17:54
jroll#topic open discussion17:54
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: ironic)"17:54
*** mbound_ has quit IRC17:55
jrollanyone have anything?17:55
mgouldany code reviews I could help with?17:58
dtantsurmgould, all of them :D17:58
jrollall of them!17:58
dtantsurLOL17:58
mgouldcurses17:58
rloothx mgould :D17:58
jrollmgould: manual cleaning or network stuff are the big ones right now17:58
mgouldjroll, cool, I'll prioritise accordingly :-)17:59
jrollTHANK YOU for being awesome and wanting to review things :)17:59
rloomgould: our priorities in Mitaka: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/priorities/mitaka-priorities.html17:59
jrollalright, time to shut this thing down17:59
mgouldjroll, I saw the stats this afternoon and noticed how few I'd done :-)17:59
vdrokyep, thanks17:59
jrollthanks everyone for the invigorating monday morning discussion :)17:59
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-318:00
jroll#end,eeting18:00
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:00
jroll#endmeeting18:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:00
openstackMeeting ended Mon Dec 21 18:00:07 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2015/ironic.2015-12-21-17.00.html18:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2015/ironic.2015-12-21-17.00.txt18:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2015/ironic.2015-12-21-17.00.log.html18:00
*** dtantsur has left #openstack-meeting-318:00
*** mgould has left #openstack-meeting-318:01
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC18:03
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-318:05
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:05
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-318:08
*** stendulker has quit IRC18:09
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting-318:13
*** yamahata has quit IRC18:16
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-318:16
*** dslevin__ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:20
*** dslevin_ has quit IRC18:20
*** rossella_s has quit IRC18:21
*** electrichead is now known as redrobot18:21
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-318:22
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-318:30
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:30
*** lucasagomes has left #openstack-meeting-318:31
*** vahidh_ has quit IRC18:33
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-318:34
*** dslevin__ has quit IRC18:36
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-318:37
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:42
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-318:43
*** rloo has left #openstack-meeting-318:46
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:54
*** piet has quit IRC18:58
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-318:59
*** safchain has quit IRC19:02
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC19:05
*** mbound_ has joined #openstack-meeting-319:09
*** mbound_ has quit IRC19:11
*** mbound_ has joined #openstack-meeting-319:11
*** dslevin_ has quit IRC19:16
*** vahidh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-319:16
*** vahidh has quit IRC19:19
*** reed has quit IRC19:21
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting-319:25
*** doug-fish has quit IRC19:29
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-319:45
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-319:46
*** reed has quit IRC19:47
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-319:48
*** markvoelker has quit IRC19:50
*** vahidh_ has quit IRC19:50
*** primeministerp has joined #openstack-meeting-319:53
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting-319:54
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-319:58
*** dslevin_ has quit IRC20:00
*** reed has quit IRC20:01
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting-320:03
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC20:03
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-320:06
*** irenab has quit IRC20:06
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-320:08
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-320:09
*** irenab has quit IRC20:11
*** Swami has quit IRC20:16
*** vahidh has quit IRC20:19
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-320:20
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-320:21
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:25
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-320:29
*** irenab has quit IRC20:31
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-320:31
*** irenab has quit IRC20:32
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:34
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-320:35
*** irenab has quit IRC20:36
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-320:38
*** baoli has quit IRC20:40
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-320:43
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-320:43
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:45
*** mrmartin has quit IRC20:45
*** irenab has quit IRC20:48
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-320:49
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-320:50
*** s3wong has quit IRC20:51
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting-320:51
*** irenab has quit IRC20:53
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-320:54
*** Eva-i has joined #openstack-meeting-320:56
*** irenab has quit IRC20:57
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-320:59
flwang#startmeeting zaqar20:59
openstackMeeting started Mon Dec 21 20:59:37 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is flwang. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:59
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:59
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: zaqar)"20:59
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'zaqar'20:59
flwangi'm wondering if we have enough people for the meeting :)20:59
Eva-iHello20:59
flwangEva-i: i guess just you and me :)21:00
Eva-iflwang: let's wait a bit21:00
flwangEva-i: yep, sure21:00
*** vahidh has quit IRC21:00
*** kzaitsev1mb has joined #openstack-meeting-321:01
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC21:01
vkmco/21:02
vkmchey hey21:02
flwangvkmc: hey21:03
*** irenab has quit IRC21:03
flwangglad to see you can join :)21:03
*** kzaitsev1mb is now known as kzaitsev_mb21:04
flwangshould we start now?21:05
Eva-iflwang: okay21:05
flwang#topic roll call21:05
*** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: zaqar)"21:05
flwango/21:05
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-321:05
vkmco/21:05
*** irenab has quit IRC21:06
Eva-io/21:06
flwangcool21:06
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-321:06
flwang#topic zaqar client21:07
*** openstack changes topic to "zaqar client (Meeting topic: zaqar)"21:07
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-321:07
flwangit's still in progress21:07
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-321:07
flwangunfortunately, we're still missing the full support for claim in v121:07
flwangand missing the support for subscription for v221:08
flwangvkmc: it would be nice if you can help review those patches21:08
flwangwe really really need to get them done in M-221:08
vkmcyeah, sorry for my constant delays21:08
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-321:08
*** dedery has joined #openstack-meeting-321:09
flwangvkmc: that's not your fault, we're a tiny team, so we just depend on your guys too much :D21:10
Eva-iflwang: I can review them too after submitting config-ref patch21:10
Eva-iflwang: it will be soon21:10
flwangeverybody may up and down for the review performance, it's totally ok21:10
flwangEva-i: it would be awesome21:10
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC21:10
vkmcflwang, I know yeah, still it feels bad to see you working so much and I putting fires down somewhere else21:11
*** dedery has quit IRC21:11
flwangvkmc: no worries, that's my duty :)21:11
flwang#topic zaqar UI21:12
*** openstack changes topic to "zaqar UI (Meeting topic: zaqar)"21:12
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-321:12
flwangunfortunately, we didn't get any +1 from horizon team, it's understandable given the xmas holiday is coming21:12
*** irenab has quit IRC21:13
flwangi'm still working on adding the zaqar api into the plugin and get it work21:13
flwanghowever, i have to admit the angular JS is not really straightforward or I"m just not a good frontend developer :(21:13
*** dedery has joined #openstack-meeting-321:14
flwangi'm stuck now and i'm looking for some help from horizon team and my internal team21:14
vkmcoh it's not straightforward :/21:14
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-321:14
flwangvkmc: that's my justification :D21:14
*** irenab has quit IRC21:14
flwangexcuse i mean ;)21:15
Eva-iflwang: recently I tried to run Magnum UI recently to inspect how angular.js things are working there, so I can implement them in Zaqar UI. But it wasn't working.21:15
flwanganyway, if you guys have time, just play it and fix it21:15
Eva-iflwang: I talked to a guy in Magnum team, he said he will fix the bug.21:15
flwangEva-i: yep, that's not surprise21:15
flwangEva-i: did you open a bug for the problem you saw?21:16
flwanglink?21:16
*** vahidh has quit IRC21:16
Eva-iNo, the guy thanked me about the provided logs and said he will open bug report it. Also it's actually not a bug in Magnum UI, but in Horizon. I'm sorry, I forgot the person's name.21:17
flwangEva-i: ok, it's fine.21:18
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-321:18
flwangEva-i: so at least the basic UI framework works for you, right?21:18
flwangif so, would you mind +1 for that patch?21:18
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-321:18
*** irenab has quit IRC21:19
Eva-iflwang: okay, will +1, though I haven't inspected the code...21:19
Eva-i*work fine21:19
flwangEva-i: it's ok, we just need to know if it's ok, and given it's a start point, so there must be some bugs, but we can fix them later ;)21:20
Eva-iflwang: alright21:20
flwangok, anything we need to talk about the UI?21:21
Eva-iflwang: I have no questions now21:21
flwang#topic docs21:21
*** openstack changes topic to "docs (Meeting topic: zaqar)"21:21
flwangEva-i: would you mind giving a summary about the docs? I think you're the lead of this work :)21:21
Eva-iflwang: okay21:22
Eva-i1. Contributor docs are awaiting patch approval, then some other patches will be created for it.21:25
Eva-i2. Fei Long took API-ref and "User Guide" work, and it seems like everything will be fine21:25
Eva-i3. I took config-ref and writing it. It will be done very soon, maybe in the end of today. There are some questions I wanted to ask before I submit the patch.21:25
Eva-i4. Main wiki page is refactored more, and I want Fei Long to check "Key features" section.21:25
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-321:26
flwangsounds good21:26
flwangi will review the #1 patch, though it's a little big for me :)21:26
*** irenab has quit IRC21:27
Eva-iI'll ask questions about config-ref in Zaqar chat.21:27
*** lblanchard has quit IRC21:27
flwangas for #2, i'm not really sure if i can get it done in M-2, maybe slip to M-3 based on my currrent bandwidth21:27
Eva-iflwang: I'm thinkin to splitting this patch to style changes and content changes21:27
Eva-iflwang: sure21:27
flwangi will review #4 if i can get a link ;)21:28
Eva-iflwang: here #4 link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zaqar21:28
flwangEva-i: it would nice lovely if you can add the subscription part for the key features21:29
Eva-iflwang: I'm just wondering if I made a mistake for splitting HTTP API and Websocket API.21:29
Eva-iflwang: oki, I'll surely add it.21:30
flwangEva-i: no, it's ok to describe them separately. but as for this line 'This feature is currently in development. '21:30
Eva-iflwang: also I can refactor some of sub-pages in Wiki, but will consult first.21:30
flwangit's not really accurate21:30
vkmcEva-i, why you think so about splitting the API?21:30
flwangi think we should remove it21:30
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-321:30
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-321:31
flwangvkmc: i think she means she describe the two transport layers separately21:31
Eva-iflwang: alright, I'll remove 'in development' line.21:31
flwangnot splitting in zaqar source code21:31
*** irenab has quit IRC21:31
flwangEva-i: right?21:31
Eva-iflwang: yes21:31
Eva-iflwang: I just noticed Zaqar team prefer to talk only about one API and call it "Zaqar API".21:32
Eva-iflwang: what I did in wiki - I splitted this term to websocket one and http one.21:32
vkmcoh yes21:32
vkmcbut it's ok21:32
flwangEva-i: not really, that's because most of the other openstack projects only has the rest api21:32
*** s3wong has quit IRC21:33
flwangso generally, when we talking about zaqar api, we mean the rest api21:33
vkmcI mean, it's confusing to talk about one API being the way of interacting with both of them so different21:33
vkmcbeing that*21:33
flwangbut that doesn't mean we don't care about the websocket, in reverse, it's very important21:33
*** dims_ has quit IRC21:33
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-321:33
flwangvkmc: did you mean you prefer to describe the transport layer in high level instead of talking them separately?21:34
Eva-iflwang: I think in the future we should split "Zaqar API" term to "Zaqar Websocket API" and "Zaqar HTTP REST API" in our documentation. And also write separate websocket API reference.21:34
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-321:35
vkmcflwang, oh no, I rather to have them splitted21:35
*** irenab has quit IRC21:35
vkmcI rather have them*21:35
*** mari0jv has quit IRC21:35
*** markvoelker has quit IRC21:36
flwangvkmc: ok, cool21:36
*** Aish has quit IRC21:36
*** vhoward has quit IRC21:36
flwanganything we need to discuss for this topic?21:37
flwanganything more i mean21:37
Eva-iflwang: no, I think21:37
flwang#topic new features21:38
*** openstack changes topic to "new features (Meeting topic: zaqar)"21:38
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-321:39
flwangi have submitted a spec for more reserved queue attributes https://review.openstack.org/#/c/257622/21:40
flwangvkmc: flaper87: pls review it21:40
*** irenab has quit IRC21:40
vkmcflwang, k, thanks21:40
Eva-iflwang: I saw this blueprint, but don't have enough knowledge to discuss it.21:40
flwangi would like to add the delay queue support in Mitaka, but I'm afraid i don't have much bandwidth21:40
flwangvkmc: as for the sql migration, if you are not really interested in it, maybe you can take a look the delay queue21:41
*** vgridnev has quit IRC21:42
vkmcflwang, oh, I'm interested in the mysql migration one21:42
vkmcflwang, what is the delay queue one about?21:42
flwangpersonally, given the sqlachemy is not zaqar's recommned production db, so it's not really urgent for the migration work, how do you think?21:42
flwangvkmc: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSSimpleQueueService/latest/SQSDeveloperGuide/sqs-delay-queues.html21:43
vkmcnice21:43
*** dims has quit IRC21:43
vkmcflwang, I could check on the delay queues thing if you consider is more urgent21:43
flwangvkmc: personally, i think the delay queue is a good feature and has a higher priority than the sql migration21:44
flwangbut depends on your interest21:44
vkmcit actually seems more interesting21:44
vkmcbut well, we have to implement them both anyways21:45
flwangvkmc: yep, we would like to have them both21:47
flwangbut we don't have much bandwidth, IMO21:47
Eva-iwe have so much to do in Zaqar, we can only control priorities now.21:47
flwangvkmc: so if you have started the sql migration work21:48
vkmcexactly yes21:48
flwangjust go for it21:48
vkmcok21:48
flwangi will try to submit at least the spec of delay queue in Mitaka and so that we can get it done in the early of N21:48
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-321:49
*** irenab has quit IRC21:49
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-321:49
*** vahidh has quit IRC21:50
flwangok, any other feature we need to talk at here?21:52
flwang#topic open discussion21:52
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: zaqar)"21:52
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-321:53
flwangvkmc: i will take vacation from 25 Dec to 4 Jan, back to work on 5 Jan21:53
flwangbut i will work in the vacation for email things and code review21:53
vkmcflwang, that's great!21:53
flwangvkmc: what's your plan?21:53
vkmcI saw that meetings will be canceled for those two weeks21:53
vkmcwhich is good for me since we also have several holidays on those weeks21:54
flwangvkmc: yep, that's one thing i need to confirm with you guys21:54
flwangare you happy with that?21:54
flwangcancel the next 2 meetings21:54
flwangvkmc: cool21:54
vkmcyeah, I think it's the wise thing to do21:54
vkmcI'll add that to the wiki21:54
vkmcmeetings wiki21:54
Eva-iflwang: I'm okay with canceled meetings21:54
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-321:55
flwangvkmc: cool. thanks21:55
Eva-ivkmc: can I take a "holiday" from Dec 30 to Jan 3?21:55
vkmcEva-i, of course21:55
Eva-ivkmc: thanks21:56
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-321:57
flwangok, anything else?21:59
flwangotherwise, let close the meeting and see you guys next year :D22:00
flwangat here22:00
flwang#endmeeting22:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:00
openstackMeeting ended Mon Dec 21 22:00:23 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zaqar/2015/zaqar.2015-12-21-20.59.html22:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zaqar/2015/zaqar.2015-12-21-20.59.txt22:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zaqar/2015/zaqar.2015-12-21-20.59.log.html22:00
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-322:02
*** cbouch has quit IRC22:02
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC22:05
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting-322:06
*** mariojv has joined #openstack-meeting-322:06
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-322:08
*** dims has quit IRC22:08
*** Aish has quit IRC22:09
*** piet has quit IRC22:10
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-322:12
*** dims_ has quit IRC22:13
*** vahidh has quit IRC22:20
*** sdake has quit IRC22:21
*** primeministerp has quit IRC22:25
*** dims has quit IRC22:29
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-322:30
*** e0ne has quit IRC22:35
*** vahidh has quit IRC22:35
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-322:37
*** rtheis has quit IRC22:42
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck22:42
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-322:46
*** Eva-i has quit IRC22:49
*** vahidh has quit IRC22:50
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-322:51
*** markvoelker has quit IRC22:51
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-322:52
*** dslevin_ has quit IRC22:55
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-322:57
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-322:57
*** irenab has quit IRC22:57
*** ajmiller has quit IRC22:58
*** ajmiller_ has joined #openstack-meeting-322:58
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-323:03
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-323:03
*** mtanino has quit IRC23:03
*** irenab has quit IRC23:04
*** Eva-i has joined #openstack-meeting-323:04
*** woodster_ has quit IRC23:06
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-323:07
*** irenab has quit IRC23:09
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-323:12
*** irenab has quit IRC23:13
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-323:16
*** irenab has quit IRC23:17
*** vahidh has quit IRC23:20
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-323:21
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-323:21
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-323:22
*** irenab has quit IRC23:23
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-323:25
*** baoli has quit IRC23:28
*** Eva-i has quit IRC23:29
*** dims has quit IRC23:30
*** dedery has quit IRC23:32
*** krtaylor has quit IRC23:32
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-323:32
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-323:33
*** irenab has quit IRC23:33
*** Eva-i has joined #openstack-meeting-323:43
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC23:43
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-323:44
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-323:45
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck23:46
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-323:48
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-323:50
*** vahidh has quit IRC23:50
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-323:50
*** baoli has quit IRC23:51
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-323:51
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-323:57
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck23:57
*** irenab has quit IRC23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!