Thursday, 2018-08-09

*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC00:03
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-300:04
*** bobh has quit IRC00:08
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-300:09
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-300:12
*** bobh has quit IRC00:13
*** pbourke has quit IRC01:20
*** pbourke has joined #openstack-meeting-301:22
*** zhurong has quit IRC01:47
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-301:48
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:51
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-301:56
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-302:21
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-302:34
*** rmcallis has joined #openstack-meeting-302:39
*** rmcall has quit IRC02:41
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting-302:46
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-302:47
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-302:49
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-302:53
*** bobh has quit IRC02:55
*** rmcall has joined #openstack-meeting-302:56
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-302:56
*** rmcallis has quit IRC02:57
*** bobh has quit IRC02:57
*** bobh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-303:08
*** bobh_ has quit IRC03:11
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC03:30
*** hongbin has quit IRC03:41
*** dklyle has quit IRC03:42
*** bobh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-303:44
*** zhurong has quit IRC03:53
*** bobh_ has quit IRC04:01
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-304:11
*** liuyulong has joined #openstack-meeting-304:22
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-304:22
*** e0ne has quit IRC04:24
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC04:26
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-304:41
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-304:42
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting-306:38
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-307:11
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-307:14
*** yamamoto has quit IRC07:22
*** rmart04_ has joined #openstack-meeting-307:26
*** rmart04 has quit IRC07:26
*** rmart04_ is now known as rmart0407:26
*** rmart04 has quit IRC08:13
*** tssurya has joined #openstack-meeting-308:19
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-309:00
*** pbourke has quit IRC09:08
*** pbourke has joined #openstack-meeting-309:16
*** moguimar has joined #openstack-meeting-309:22
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-309:55
*** sambetts|afk has quit IRC11:29
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-311:31
*** bobh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-311:31
*** sambetts_ is now known as sambetts11:35
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk11:35
*** zchkun_ has joined #openstack-meeting-311:41
*** zchkun_ has quit IRC11:42
*** zchkun_ has joined #openstack-meeting-311:43
*** zchkun_ has quit IRC11:43
*** sambetts|afk has quit IRC11:46
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-311:47
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-311:57
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC12:04
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-312:04
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting-312:19
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-312:23
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC12:27
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC12:36
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-312:37
*** ianychoi has quit IRC12:49
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC12:54
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-312:56
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-313:02
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC13:15
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-313:18
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC13:22
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-313:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:31
*** apetrich has quit IRC13:34
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC13:37
*** sambetts has joined #openstack-meeting-313:38
*** bobh_ has quit IRC13:44
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-meeting-313:47
*** jeremyfreudberg has quit IRC13:48
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-meeting-313:48
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-313:54
*** sambetts has quit IRC13:55
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-313:58
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-313:59
tellesnobrega#startmeeting sahara14:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Aug  9 14:00:20 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tellesnobrega. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: sahara)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'sahara'14:00
jeremyfreudbergo/14:00
*** apetrich has quit IRC14:01
toskyo/14:01
*** amotoki_ is now known as amotoki14:01
tellesnobregalets start14:01
tellesnobrega#topic News/Updates14:01
*** openstack changes topic to "News/Updates (Meeting topic: sahara)"14:01
toskystill working on S3 testing14:01
jeremyfreudbergnot much new to report from me14:03
tellesnobregafrom me neither, mostly reviews and will prepare cycle highlights and cut RC1 today14:03
toskyI will be on PTO next week, so no sahara-tests release for now, but it's independent anyway14:04
tellesnobregaok14:04
toskyI'd like t ocomplete this S3 support, but it requires some changes in sahara-scenario to support S3 parameters14:05
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC14:05
toskythat's why I asked jeremyfreudberg about how how to pass the parameters for S3 in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589645/14:06
tellesnobregacool14:07
*** zchkun_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:07
tellesnobregado we have any specific concerns for RC1?14:07
jeremyfreudbergfor rc1, i'd like to include my s3 doc patch14:07
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:07
jeremyfreudbergthe only other real patch we have is the fixing anti-affinity14:08
jeremyfreudbergit may have to cause an rc214:08
tellesnobregayes, no time for it now14:08
tellesnobregaI will review the doc after this meeting14:08
jeremyfreudbergcool14:08
jeremyfreudbergzchkun_, how have you been?14:09
zchkun_I'm sorry, no progress on my side14:10
zchkun_it was delayed by other things.14:10
jeremyfreudbergzchkun_, no problem14:11
jeremyfreudbergtopics for today?14:15
tellesnobregasorry14:15
tellesnobregaI don't have specific stuff to discuss, I think tosky might have something14:15
toskyI, uh, don't14:17
toskyI have few jobs-related task after the branching14:17
jeremyfreudbergi have some comments on boot from volume which we can discuss14:18
tellesnobregajeremyfreudberg, go aheaddd14:19
tellesnobrega#topic boot-from-volume14:19
*** openstack changes topic to "boot-from-volume (Meeting topic: sahara)"14:19
jeremyfreudbergyes, so in rocky we added the ability to specify that an instance should boot from volume, as a node group template option14:20
jeremyfreudbergwe have another set of ngt options for additional attached volumes, which get used to back hdfs specifically14:20
jeremyfreudbergfor these attached volumes, we give a lot more configuration options:14:21
jeremyfreudbergvolumes_per_node, volumes_size, volumes_availability_zone, volume_type, volume_local_to_instance, volume_mount_prefix14:21
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC14:21
jeremyfreudbergsome of those aren't relevant to boot from volume14:22
jeremyfreudbergvolumes_per_node, volumes_size (for bootable volume, it comes from the flavor), volume_mount_prefix (a bootable volume has its own way of mounting, i think)14:22
jeremyfreudbergbut the other ones are potentially useful14:23
jeremyfreudbergso we should have a brief discussion on how the interface will be for that14:23
tellesnobregatrue, we can definitely take a look and see how we can improve it14:23
jeremyfreudbergbasically the question is, should we create new options like boot_from_volume_type, boot_form_volume_az, boot_from_volume_locality, etc14:24
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:24
jeremyfreudbergor should the current set of options for attached volumes also affect the bootable volume14:24
jeremyfreudbergmy own thought, is that we should create new options14:25
jeremyfreudbergthe user might have different requirements for the boot volume (for the os) versus for the attached volume (for hdfs specifically)14:25
tellesnobregaI'm not entirely sure, I will have to dig a little more to make a decision14:25
jeremyfreudbergyes, it will be in stein anyway, so we  can think14:25
tellesnobregait makes sense to have separated14:26
jeremyfreudbergtosky-- any preliminary thoughts?14:26
tellesnobregabut I want to double check, so we don't have too much stuff and complicate things14:27
jeremyfreudbergtellesnobrega: yes, i agree with that too14:27
tellesnobregabut it is good that you brought it up, we can take some time to look it up, understand the pros and cons14:28
tellesnobregaand if we don't decide prior to PTG we have time there to talk about it14:28
toskyprobably better separately14:29
jeremyfreudbergcool14:30
jeremyfreudbergthat's it from me14:30
tellesnobregaI'm done as well14:33
toskynothing else from me too14:34
jeremyfreudbergtellesnobrega, reminder to make the ptg etherpad14:34
tellesnobregajeremyfreudberg, it is on my queue14:34
tellesnobregaprobably get to it tomorrow14:34
tellesnobregathanks everyone14:35
tellesnobregawe get 25 minutes back14:35
tellesnobrega#endmeeting14:35
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/"14:35
openstackMeeting ended Thu Aug  9 14:35:34 2018 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:35
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2018/sahara.2018-08-09-14.00.html14:35
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2018/sahara.2018-08-09-14.00.txt14:35
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2018/sahara.2018-08-09-14.00.log.html14:35
*** jeremyfreudberg has left #openstack-meeting-314:35
*** zchkun_ has quit IRC14:36
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC14:39
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:40
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-314:41
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-314:46
*** xubozhang has joined #openstack-meeting-314:56
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting-315:00
mlavalle#startmeeting neutron_l315:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Aug  9 15:00:11 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_l3)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3'15:00
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-315:00
njohnstono/15:00
haleybhi15:01
mlavalle#topic Announcements15:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: neutron_l3)"15:01
mlavallefwiw, it's been a few hectic days this week15:01
slaweqhi15:02
mlavalleWe will cutting rc1 later today15:02
njohnstonexcellent!15:02
mlavalleamotoki is goiung to push the patch and we are going to mark it wip until we know the feat of https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron-fwaas+branch:master+topic:bug/172072715:02
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-315:03
Swamihi15:03
mlavalleeverything else is already in15:03
amotokiFYI a neutron RC1 patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/590360/15:03
mlavalleamotoki: cool, thanks, I will take it from here15:03
mlavallehave a good night15:04
mlavalleamotoki: ahh I see you are writing the cycle highlights. Thanks for that15:04
mlavalleI also think that all of you must have received you ATC invite for the Berlin Summit15:05
mlavalledid you notice its is not free anymore?15:05
Swamimlavalle: it is only free if you attend the PTG, and partial if you are an ATC15:06
mlavalleahhh, good thing I didn't register using it15:06
mlavalleI was about to do it15:07
mlavalleLOL15:07
mlavalleany other announcements for today?15:07
*** rmart04 has quit IRC15:07
mlavalleif not, let's move on15:08
mlavalle#topic Bugs15:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: neutron_l3)"15:08
mlavalleSwami: welcome from vacation.... do you want to start?15:08
Swamisure,15:09
SwamiI did see that there are couple of new bugs filed against DVR.15:09
Swami#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/178347015:09
openstackLaunchpad bug 1783470 in neutron "get_subnet_for_dvr returns SNAT mac instead of gateway in subnet_info" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Arjun Baindur (abaindur)15:09
SwamiThere is a patch under review for this bug. #link https://review.openstack.org/58723415:09
SwamiI will review the bug and the patch. I did see that Brian had already reviewed this patch.15:10
SwamiThe next one in the list is15:10
mlavallehe doesn't seem to be responding to reviews15:10
mlavallewe might have to take over the patch15:11
Swamimlavalle: let me take it in that case and will work it out.15:11
haleybmlavalle: he pinged me yesterday and said he would update with a test15:11
Swami#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/178365415:11
openstackLaunchpad bug 1783654 in neutron "DVR process flow not installed on physical bridge for shared tenant network" [Undecided,New]15:11
mlavallehaleyb: ack15:11
SwamiThis one I just looked at it, it seems that for the shared tenant network, we are seeing the Router MAC learned by the physical switches, let me see how we can tackle this. I need to triage this as well15:12
SwamiThe next one in the list is15:12
Swami#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/178627215:12
openstackLaunchpad bug 1786272 in neutron "Connection between two virtual routers does not work with DVR" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Brian Haley (brian-haley)15:12
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC15:13
haleybi just filed that15:13
haleybi had added to end of agenda, or we can talk about it now15:13
mlavalleahhh, so it it must be an ivalid bug ;-)15:13
haleybSwami: does the description make sense for this invalid bug :-p15:13
SwamiLet me review the bug and will post my comments.15:14
*** davidsha has joined #openstack-meeting-315:14
Swamihaleyb: The description is good enough15:14
haleybok, basically two neutron routers with static routes, everything works when both instances are local to a compute, doesn't when on different15:14
SwamiSo I suspect that it is case of the l2pop not populating the MAC of other router in the compute when there is no other instances of that router in the current compute host.15:15
Swamis/other router/other VMs15:16
SwamiDid you try enabling 'ARP Responder' along with DVR.15:16
haleybbut those VMs are on a different subnet15:16
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:16
mlavalleit's two different router, no?15:17
SwamiI know we had a limitation on connecting router to another router,15:17
haleybyes, two neutron routers, no shared subnet15:17
SwamiSo we might be hitting the limitation.15:17
Swamihaleyb: But let me check it and will add my comments in the bug. I am still in Jet Lag.15:18
mlavalleLOL15:18
haleybit was odd it worked in some situations, i didn't remember any limitations. i also need to try and setup a test env since it required 3 nodes15:18
Swamihaleyb: I might have a three node setup. I will try it out and will let you know.15:19
Swamimlavalle: that's all I had for the DVR bugs. Back to you.15:20
haleybSwami: great, ping me if you need help as i ran through the steps locally w/out dvr the other day15:20
mlavalleSwami: Thnaks15:20
Swamihaleyb: ok will do15:20
mlavalleOn my side, we found this past Tuesday https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/178584815:21
openstackLaunchpad bug 1785848 in neutron "Neutron server producing tracebacks with 'L3RouterPlugin' object has no attribute 'is_distributed_router' when DVR is enabled" [High,Fix released] - Assigned to Brian Haley (brian-haley)15:21
mlavalleand haleyb right away fixed it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/589573/15:21
mlavallethanks for the quick fix. It made it into our rc115:21
mlavalleLast night I spent time debugging https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/176670115:23
openstackLaunchpad bug 1766701 in neutron "Trunk Tests are failing often in dvr-multinode scenario job" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel)15:23
mlavalleit turns out that one of the failures is with the test and I had been working on it a few weeks ago15:24
mlavalleHere's the patch that I had proposed earlier: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57104315:24
mlavalleThis command is problematic: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571043/2/neutron_tempest_plugin/scenario/test_trunk.py@3215:25
mlavalleplaying with it last night I found two syntax errors15:25
mlavalleI am not satisfied yet that we have exactly what we need but I will be working on it a little further today15:26
mlavalleand when I feel happy with it I will turn the patch into a real one15:27
mlavalleand those are all the bugs I have for today15:27
mlavalleany other bugs we should discuss today?15:27
mlavalleok, let's move on15:28
mlavalle#topic Openflow DVR15:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Openflow DVR (Meeting topic: neutron_l3)"15:28
* mlavalle just realizes that the meeting bot seems to be working again15:29
davidshaLol15:29
davidshaxubozhang, you there?15:29
davidshaWe've been updating the rebase patch, haleyb mentioned there was another patch that we'd need to rebase on.15:30
davidshaWe're also going to start rebasing the dvr_bridge patch onto the refactor patch as well15:31
davidshagive me one sec to get links!15:31
mlavalleok15:31
haleybdavidsha: i'd guess it depends which merges first, but i'd figure the removal of the external bridge would.  code looked goot otherwise!15:32
haleybgood even15:32
davidshathe agent refactor patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528336/15:32
davidshaYa, we'll need to see how it effects the dvr_bridge patch15:32
davidshado we just presume the external bridge is called br-ex or is there another way to find the name?15:33
haleybi don't remember off the top of my head, might have had to do something in that patch for it15:34
xubozhangDavid, i am back15:34
davidshakk15:34
davidshaany updates xubozhang ?15:34
davidshahaleyb,  thanks for the reviews btw!#15:34
xubozhangnot major ones15:35
xubozhangyesterday there were a couple of CI failures15:35
davidshaunrelated to the patch?15:35
mlavalleif you give the list of patches, I will create a blueprint and a gerrit topic foir them15:35
xubozhangafter recheck a couple of times, it seemed fine15:36
xubozhang52833615:36
davidshamlavalle, Thanks, at the moment it's these two: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528336/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472289/15:36
mlavalledavidsha: ok15:37
mlavalledavidsha, xubozhang: I am goint to create a blueprint for it and it is going to be in our stain dashboard15:37
davidshathank you!15:37
mlavalleso we are foccially commiting this for Stein15:37
xubozhangthanks!15:37
haleybdavidsha: the functional tests changed to use ovs_integration_bridge from external_network_bridge, hopefully that will work for this as well15:37
mlavalleis that ok with you?15:37
davidshaIt's good with me but I won't be implementing it ;)15:38
mlavallehow about you xubozhang?15:39
davidshaIt should be fine!15:39
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting-315:39
xubozhangi don't know about this change15:39
mlavallewell, I say, if we don't put some pressure on ourseleves, we will never land this stuff. so let's make it official commitment for Stein15:40
davidshawill do, I'll make sure it gets in!15:41
mlavalleok, anything else to discuss today?15:42
davidshaWill the PTG be streamed again this yea?15:42
davidshayear*15:42
mlavalleif there is enough interest, I'll give it a try15:42
davidshakk, Thanks!15:43
mlavalle#topic Open Agenda15:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Agenda (Meeting topic: neutron_l3)"15:43
mlavallehaleyb: next week I'll be in China so most likely, please run the meeting without me15:44
haleybmlavalle: next week i'm on vacation, so guess we should cancel15:44
*** psachin has quit IRC15:44
mlavalleahhh, the Vineyard15:44
mlavallehave fun!15:44
haleybyes, and my timing is perfect for RC :(15:44
mlavalleany other topics?15:45
mlavalleok, thanks for attending15:45
mlavalletalk to you in two weeks15:45
Swamibye15:45
mlavalle#endmeeting15:46
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/"15:46
openstackMeeting ended Thu Aug  9 15:46:00 2018 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:46
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_l3/2018/neutron_l3.2018-08-09-15.00.html15:46
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_l3/2018/neutron_l3.2018-08-09-15.00.txt15:46
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_l3/2018/neutron_l3.2018-08-09-15.00.log.html15:46
davidshaThanks!15:46
*** xubozhang has quit IRC15:46
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-315:48
*** tssurya has quit IRC15:48
*** dtantsur has joined #openstack-meeting-315:50
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting-315:56
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting-315:59
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC15:59
*** dklyle has quit IRC15:59
edleafe#startmeeting api_sig16:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Aug  9 16:00:07 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is edleafe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: api_sig)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'api_sig'16:00
edleafe#chair cdent elmiko edleafe dtantsur16:00
edleafe#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/API-SIG#Agenda16:00
openstackCurrent chairs: cdent dtantsur edleafe elmiko16:00
dtantsuro/16:00
edleafeAnyone around today?16:00
cdento/16:01
edleafeelmiko said he would be late16:01
edleafeSo anyone have anything mean to say about him?16:01
edleafe:)16:01
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting-316:01
cdenthe didn't do my action items, so I had to16:01
edleafethat bastard!!16:01
edleafewhich brings us to...16:02
edleafe#topic previous meeting action items16:02
edleafe#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_sig/2018/16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "previous meeting action items (Meeting topic: api_sig)"16:02
edleafecdent: got a link to the ptg etherpad?16:02
cdentso it turned out we had already made one:16:03
cdent#link ptg etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-sig-stein-ptg16:03
edleafethat makes things easy16:03
cdenti only figured it out after I went to update the wiki page, and found a link already there16:04
cdentso I merged them16:04
cdentthe old one now has the new one's content added to it16:05
edleafeAnd the other action item: adding the links to the IETF proposal?16:05
cdentyeah, reviews are up16:05
cdent3 of em even16:05
*** davidsha has quit IRC16:06
edleafewowza16:06
cdenti went to do the one and thought of something sort of related and then another sort of related16:06
cdentand...16:06
dtantsurlemme guess: I forget to change my subscription to api-sig gerrit!16:06
edleafe#action edleafe dtantsur elmiko to review the new patches from cdent16:06
edleafeme too16:08
edleafeMoving on...16:09
edleafe#topic open mic and ongoing or new biz16:09
edleafe#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-sig-stein-ptg16:09
*** openstack changes topic to "open mic and ongoing or new biz (Meeting topic: api_sig)"16:09
edleafeGuess I didn't need to prompt cdent to post the link :)16:10
edleafeSo we have three topics16:10
edleafeShould I add something on discussing the IETF draft?16:11
cdentperhaps?16:12
edleafeadded16:13
edleafeAny other new biz?16:13
cdentIn my head I was thinking "who is going to be in this room?" and couldn't really find anything for sure16:13
cdentso figured that today's newletter would fish for etherpad additions16:13
edleafeOh, good. Thanks for volunteering to write it!16:14
edleafeHappy fishing!16:14
dtantsur:D16:14
cdentyeah, I figured I would suffer that16:14
edleafeAnd that we would enjoy your suffering16:14
cdentisn't it supposed to be elmiko suffering today?16:15
edleafeNo, we're just supposed to gossip about him16:15
cdentI hear he is _very_ hairy16:15
edleafeHe can't write a recap of the meeting he didn't attend16:15
edleafeI hear he punches small children16:16
edleafe#topic guidelines16:17
*** openstack changes topic to "guidelines (Meeting topic: api_sig)"16:17
edleafe#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/api-sig,n,z16:17
edleafeOnly new stuff is cdent's 3 patch set16:17
edleafeAnything else to say on this topic?16:18
cdentoh16:18
cdenthuzza by the way on all the renaming16:18
cdent++16:18
edleafeWhat? 'huzza' and not 'huzzah'?16:18
edleafeDoesn't have the same oomph16:18
dtantsursomething feels wrong in the air...16:19
edleafeagreed16:19
cdentI just can't type16:19
cdenth16:19
cdentbetter?16:19
edleafeahhh!16:20
edleafe#topic bug review16:20
*** openstack changes topic to "bug review (Meeting topic: api_sig)"16:20
edleafe#link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/103916:20
edleafeNo new bugs16:20
edleafeAnd no new updates from the GraphQL folks16:20
cdentthey probably off doing k8s16:22
dtantsur:)16:23
cdentor whatever comes after that16:23
edleafeI guess I should send another "are you guys still doing this" email to the list.16:24
cdenthuzzah?16:24
dtantsur"are you guys still huzzah"16:25
*** rmart04 has quit IRC16:25
cdentsounds right16:25
edleafe++16:25
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-316:25
edleafeAnything else on bugs?16:25
cdentno sir16:26
edleafe#topic weekly newsletter16:26
*** openstack changes topic to "weekly newsletter (Meeting topic: api_sig)"16:26
edleafe#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-sig-newsletter16:26
edleafeWe already have a volunteer16:26
edleafeSo anything else before we get back to our lives?16:26
edleafeI'll take that as a no16:27
edleafe#endmeeting16:27
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/"16:27
openstackMeeting ended Thu Aug  9 16:27:44 2018 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:27
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_sig/2018/api_sig.2018-08-09-16.00.html16:27
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_sig/2018/api_sig.2018-08-09-16.00.txt16:27
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_sig/2018/api_sig.2018-08-09-16.00.log.html16:27
cdentI'll try to live up to my responsibilities16:27
edleafeI'm not worried16:28
*** dtantsur has left #openstack-meeting-316:28
*** rmart04 has quit IRC16:35
*** hongbin has quit IRC16:37
*** Swami has quit IRC16:37
*** Bhujay has joined #openstack-meeting-316:53
*** moguimar has quit IRC17:01
*** cdent has left #openstack-meeting-317:07
*** raildo has quit IRC17:07
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC17:16
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting-317:31
*** raildo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-317:35
*** raildo has quit IRC17:36
*** Bhujay has quit IRC17:39
*** tbachman has joined #openstack-meeting-317:41
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-317:47
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-317:47
*** rmart04 has quit IRC17:50
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-317:51
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-317:51
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-318:00
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: rkukura hi!18:00
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: rkukura: hi18:00
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: was thinking of just waiting a bit to see if anyone joins18:01
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: sure18:01
tbachmanI can always kick off the meeting18:01
SumitNaiksatami am here18:01
SumitNaiksatambrb, but you can get started18:01
rkukuraI’m here18:01
tbachman#startmeeting networking_policy18:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Aug  9 18:01:41 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is tbachman. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"18:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'18:01
rkukuraHi18:01
tbachman#topic Agenda18:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Agenda (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"18:01
tbachmanI don’t really have one — but if anyone has topics that they want covered,  go ahead and shout them out18:02
rkukuraIf annakk were here, I’d suggest updating her on the queens support work18:03
tbachmanack18:04
* tbachman peeks around fo annakk18:04
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: the issue that kent is seeing might be related to neutron UT setup (perhaps changed in queens)18:06
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: that’s a good topic :)18:07
tbachman#topic queens branch18:07
*** openstack changes topic to "queens branch (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"18:07
tbachmanWe’re workng on adding queens to our stable/branches18:07
tbachman#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581911/ <== current queens WIP patch18:08
rkukuramore precisely, towards basing our master on neutron’s stable/queens instead of stable/pike18:08
tbachmanrkukura: thx!18:08
tbachmanactually both, right?18:09
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam mentioned that some of the UT failures might be related to the neutron UT setup, which may have changed in queens18:09
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: do you have additional insight on that?18:09
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: not really, thats my conspiracy theory for now :-)18:10
tbachmanheh18:10
SumitNaiksatamwas discussing with kent a couple of days back, and looked at it briefly18:10
tbachmanIf it’s true, then it’s just a conspiracy ;)18:10
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: and we have had a long history of those :-P18:11
tbachmanlol18:11
SumitNaiksatami couldnt nail it down, but the stack trace seemed to suggest that to me18:11
tbachmanI know that some of the UT failures seemed to suggest that API calls were being made more than once18:11
tbachmanor somehow became recursive18:12
SumitNaiksatamit doesnt seem like its hitting any of our code where it fails18:12
SumitNaiksatamyeah, moreover that recursive thingy is with regards to neutron resources18:12
tbachmaninteresting18:12
SumitNaiksatampecan.middleware.recursive.RecursionLoop: Forwarding loop detected; '/error/404' visited twice (internal redirect path: [u'/networks/943de9b6-6136-4f22-8f86-9324ac0b0074.json', '/error/404'])18:13
SumitNaiksatami have never seen this error before18:13
tbachmanI think in queens they moved to the pecan middleware?18:14
tbachmanoh18:15
tbachmanthis is in the test code — not even our plugin18:15
tbachmani see18:15
tbachmanDid we do any special wrapping of the requests?18:16
tbachmanfor UTs?18:16
SumitNaiksatamnothing that comes to me immediately18:16
SumitNaiksatamwe might have inadvertantly done something and that might have come into play with the move to pecan18:17
SumitNaiksatami think the pecan migration was ongoing for a long time18:17
SumitNaiksatamhttps://github.com/jimrollenhagen/pecan/blame/master/pecan/middleware/recursive.py18:17
SumitNaiksatamactually #link https://github.com/jimrollenhagen/pecan/blame/master/pecan/middleware/recursive.py#L28-L3018:17
SumitNaiksatamit seems to have been there for a while18:17
SumitNaiksatamso i dont think its a change in pecan18:18
tbachmanannakk just emailed — I guess she’s having trouble joining. I think it’s probably b/c of the registered NIC requirement that the infra folks imposed to deal with all the spam on IRC18:18
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC18:18
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: good point, i noticed her email too, but it didnt strike me that would have been the issue18:19
SumitNaiksatamgood catch18:19
rkukuraDid queens change the default to pecan? Have we ever tested using pecan with earlier releases?18:20
SumitNaiksatami think rkukura might be more familiar with the changes to the neutron UT setup18:20
*** njohnston has left #openstack-meeting-318:20
rkukuraI’ve only been looking at neutron branches supported by gbp!18:20
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: my understanding was that the change was incrementally happening18:20
SumitNaiksatamhas been happening18:20
SumitNaiksatamnow if you ask me what that incremental path was, i wont be able to tell, but pecan was definitely in plan in pike too18:21
tbachmanI thought there was a switchover in neutron for queens tho18:21
SumitNaiksatamplan -> play18:21
tbachmanmeaning the servers were switch18:21
tbachmanswitched18:21
tbachmanthe code was there before, but you had to configure to select it18:21
tbachmanbut I think in queens it’s the defaulit18:21
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-318:21
rkukuraI’d think pecan support would have been usable for at least a cycle before becoming the default18:21
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: okay, that might be the case18:21
SumitNaiksatamalso, i think pecan libraries were being used earlier (which is what i might be recalling having hit before)18:22
SumitNaiksatamanyway18:22
*** annakk has joined #openstack-meeting-318:23
tbachmanhttps://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/stable/queens/neutron/api/v2/router.py18:23
SumitNaiksatamannakk: hi18:23
tbachmanhttps://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/db1058a499353149a9e57d8c1d7e8e64b30772f9#diff-b9672caf8662b545dab77591f4fa326c18:23
tbachmanhi annakk!18:23
annakkhi!18:23
rkukurahi annakk!18:23
annakksorry took me some time to figure out the verification18:23
tbachman#link https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/db1058a499353149a9e57d8c1d7e8e64b30772f9#diff-b9672caf8662b545dab77591f4fa326c <= switch to pecan for UTs18:24
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: good find18:24
tbachmanthat was in queens, I believe18:24
tbachmanI’d stumbled upon this before, but I can’t recall why18:24
tbachmanthat’s how I usually find things :P18:24
SumitNaiksatam:-)18:25
tbachmanannakk: just to catch you up — we’re discussing a WIP patch for adding stable/queens, and moving master to queens18:25
tbachmanHere’s the patch (already linked for IRC, so won’t re-link again): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581911/18:26
annakkyes thanks for the update18:26
tbachmannp!18:26
SumitNaiksatamthis switch should have been ideally transparent to us18:26
tbachmanWe were just discussing some of the UT failures18:26
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: ack18:26
SumitNaiksatambut perhaps we are using some aspect of the old APIRouter (or using incorrectly)18:26
SumitNaiksatamthinking loud18:26
rkukurais it possible that our gbp REST API methods calling neutron’s REST API is being detected as recursion?18:28
rkukuraI’ll admit I haven’t looked closely at recent versions of the WIP patch, or at the failures18:28
tbachmanrkukura: I was wondering the same18:28
tbachmansince we have that extra layer that was in place in case GBP ever became an endpoint18:29
tbachmanI guess we’ll dive into this some more with the patch18:30
tbachmanannakk: anything you wanted to discuss?18:30
tbachmanit’s been some time since we met18:30
rkukurawe should probably also mention recent changes to the core team18:31
tbachmanrkukura: yes, although I don’t know if we’ve spoken directly with them about this?18:31
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: thats a good theory18:31
SumitNaiksatambut i dont think we go through the API layer for those calls18:32
annakknot really18:32
rkukuradon’t recall if we call the plugin methods directly, or go through some neutron code18:33
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-318:33
SumitNaiksatam#link https://github.com/openstack/group-based-policy/blob/master/gbpservice/network/neutronv2/local_api.py#L28818:33
SumitNaiksatami might be forgetting things here, but i think that is a direct call on the plugin reference18:34
rkukuraSumitNaiksatam: That does look pretty direct18:35
tbachmanso, maybe not the change to pecan then18:35
tbachmanor at least not in-and-of-itself18:36
tbachmansecondary effect somehoe18:36
tbachmansomehow18:36
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: but i have to say again, thats a really smart theory! (given that the message says “twice”) :-)18:37
tbachmanI guess we should move on18:37
tbachman#topic Team Cores18:37
*** openstack changes topic to "Team Cores (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"18:37
tbachmanTo address rkukura’s comment directly: two cores — who are also people from our team — have recently moved on: Ivar Lazarro and Amit Bose. I don’t believe that they are going to continue participating in GBP, but we do have to follow up with them to confirm.18:37
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: annakk: rkukura: putting out there whether or not we should consider adding cores to GBP18:38
SumitNaiksatami would proposing adding Kent Wu18:38
rkukura+218:38
SumitNaiksatami think rkukura also suggested this before18:39
annakk+218:39
tbachman+218:39
tbachmanokay18:39
tbachmanI’m not sure if there’s an official process here for adding cores18:39
SumitNaiksatamkent has been pretty active18:39
tbachmanack18:39
SumitNaiksatam(although more on the driver side)18:39
rkukuraI think the queens patch qualifies him!18:39
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-318:39
SumitNaiksatambut having worked with him, i know he understands the code base18:39
SumitNaiksatamrkukura: ah good point!18:40
tbachmanI was trying to look him up on stackalytics, but resulted in a #fail18:42
tbachmanI think it doesn’t cover GBP18:43
tbachman#6 on our committer list18:43
SumitNaiksatamwe had it in the past, but not sure if it was dropped at some point18:43
SumitNaiksatamanyway, i think we are all in agreement :-)18:44
tbachman#link https://github.com/openstack/group-based-policy/graphs/contributors <= GBP contributors list18:44
tbachman#link https://github.com/openstack/group-based-policy/commits?author=kentwu1 <= Kent Wu’s commits in GBP18:44
SumitNaiksatamthanks to ivar and amit for their fantastic contributions18:44
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: ack18:44
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: ack again18:44
tbachmanDo we need to do something like pound-startvote?18:45
tbachmanto make it official?18:45
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: probably not18:45
tbachmank18:45
tbachmanAlright18:45
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: you can just add him to the team group-based-policy team18:46
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: will do!18:46
tbachmanUnless there’s something I’m missing, we’ve just elected Kent Wu as a core in GBP18:46
tbachmanCongratulations Kent!18:46
tbachmanrkukura: annakk: SumitNaiksatam: anything else?18:46
rkukurahopefullly Kent  will start attending these (monthly)  meetings18:47
annakksince we're mentioning gratitudes, I wanted to thank Sumit for all his efforts18:47
tbachmanannakk: +1k!18:47
SumitNaiksatamannakk: thanks annakk :-)18:47
SumitNaiksatamand tbachman18:47
tbachmanthanks SumitNaiksatam!18:48
SumitNaiksatamrkukura has been an equal partner in crime from the beginning18:48
annakka really big thanks for being patient with all my questions18:48
tbachmanannakk: thanks for all your questions, and contributions :)18:48
SumitNaiksatamannakk: that was nothing, dont worry18:48
annakk:)18:48
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: +118:48
tbachmanIf there’s nothing else, then I’ll close the meeting18:49
SumitNaiksatamnothing from me for today!18:49
SumitNaiksatamtbachman: thanks!18:49
annakknor from me18:49
tbachmanSumitNaiksatam: np!18:49
rkukurathanks everyone!18:50
tbachman#endmeeting18:50
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/"18:50
openstackMeeting ended Thu Aug  9 18:50:03 2018 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:50
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2018/networking_policy.2018-08-09-18.01.html18:50
SumitNaiksatambye all!18:50
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2018/networking_policy.2018-08-09-18.01.txt18:50
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2018/networking_policy.2018-08-09-18.01.log.html18:50
tbachmanbye!18:50
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting-318:50
*** tbachman has left #openstack-meeting-318:50
*** annakk has quit IRC18:50
*** rmart04 has quit IRC19:02
*** apetrich has quit IRC19:18
*** SumitNaiksatam has left #openstack-meeting-319:25
*** rmascena__ has joined #openstack-meeting-319:29
*** tellesnobrega has quit IRC19:31
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-meeting-319:32
*** raildo_ has quit IRC19:33
*** pcaruana has quit IRC19:33
*** psachin has quit IRC20:02
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-320:05
*** rmascena__ has quit IRC20:09
*** rmascena__ has joined #openstack-meeting-320:09
*** rmascena__ has quit IRC20:16
*** apetrich has quit IRC20:20
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-320:35
*** yamahata_ has joined #openstack-meeting-320:48
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC20:56
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-321:03
*** yamahata_ is now known as yamahata__21:04
*** yamahata__ is now known as yamahata21:05
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting-321:14
*** yamahata has quit IRC21:17
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-321:18
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-321:20
*** rmart04 has quit IRC21:20
*** isq has joined #openstack-meeting-321:22
*** slaweq has quit IRC21:26
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-321:30
*** apetrich has quit IRC21:32
*** rmart04 has quit IRC21:34
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-321:35
*** iyamahat has quit IRC21:36
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-321:37
*** iyamahat has quit IRC21:41
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-321:42
*** isq_ has joined #openstack-meeting-321:47
*** isq has quit IRC21:48
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:49
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-321:56
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-322:04
*** neiljerram has quit IRC22:08
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC22:09
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-322:11
*** slaweq has quit IRC22:15
*** yamamoto has quit IRC22:21
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC22:52
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-322:58
*** sambetts_ has quit IRC23:02
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting-323:06
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-323:11
*** slaweq has quit IRC23:16

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!