Thursday, 2020-03-19

*** rubasov has quit IRC00:19
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC00:46
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-300:58
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC00:59
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting-300:59
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC01:10
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-301:13
*** rubasov has joined #openstack-meeting-301:20
*** raildo has quit IRC01:27
*** liuyulong has quit IRC01:33
*** ianychoi_ has joined #openstack-meeting-301:38
*** ianychoi has quit IRC01:40
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-301:43
*** yamamoto has quit IRC02:16
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-302:17
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-302:30
*** yamamoto has quit IRC03:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-303:01
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC03:03
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-303:06
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC03:06
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-303:06
*** apetrich has quit IRC03:09
*** yamamoto has quit IRC04:17
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC04:18
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-304:19
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC04:24
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-304:26
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-304:28
*** baojg has quit IRC04:42
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-305:19
*** macz_ has quit IRC05:24
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting-305:32
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-306:28
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC06:31
*** macz_ has quit IRC06:33
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-307:36
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting-307:58
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-308:06
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-308:16
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:16
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-308:18
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-308:29
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-308:30
*** macz_ has quit IRC08:33
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-308:53
*** psachin has quit IRC09:01
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting-309:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:04
*** e0ne has quit IRC09:36
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-309:36
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-310:20
*** macz_ has quit IRC10:25
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-310:32
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:52
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-311:56
*** e0ne_ has joined #openstack-meeting-312:20
*** e0ne has quit IRC12:21
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting-312:26
*** jraju__ has joined #openstack-meeting-312:43
*** links has quit IRC12:44
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:47
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-313:19
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:20
*** psachin has quit IRC13:21
*** jeremyfreudberg has joined #openstack-meeting-313:54
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-313:55
jeremyfreudberg#startmeeting sahara14:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 19 14:00:11 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jeremyfreudberg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: sahara)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'sahara'14:00
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-314:00
jeremyfreudbergo/14:00
toskyo/14:00
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-meeting-314:02
tellesnobregao/14:02
jeremyfreudberghi tellesnobrega14:02
jeremyfreudberg#topic news/updates14:02
*** openstack changes topic to "news/updates (Meeting topic: sahara)"14:02
toskyno updates yet on the Contributor goal (but working on it)14:02
toskyI have a few updates on sahara-dashboard (you may have seen a few patches going on)14:03
toskyuhm, s/on/around/14:03
tellesnobreganothing from me14:03
jeremyfreudbergnothing from me either, i thought there was another week until today's meeting.... honestly not sure where the time went14:04
jeremyfreudberg#topic sahara-dashboard stuff14:04
*** openstack changes topic to "sahara-dashboard stuff (Meeting topic: sahara)"14:04
jeremyfreudbergtosky anythig you want to share about dashboard?14:04
toskyso14:08
toskyI wanted to merge https://review.opendev.org/#/c/710211/14:08
toskyfailing for two reasons: one is related to some stuff happening with an external library (pyScss)14:09
toskythe related issues have been fixed in master, the horizon team is looking to fix them in stable/train14:09
toskythe other failure is in the lower-constraint job, and I though that merging this backport would have worked: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/713752/14:09
toskyafter some discussion with the horizon team, it looks like the proper fix is simpler (https://review.opendev.org/#/c/713862/), but https://review.opendev.org/#/c/713752/ may be nice to have afterwards14:10
toskywe still need to wait for the pyscss fix in stable/train though14:10
toskymore details are available from the backported review's comment and here: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-horizon/%23openstack-horizon.2020-03-19.log.html#t2020-03-19T11:38:5614:11
toskyaaand that's it, so when the dashboard turn green again it means we can merge https://review.opendev.org/#/c/713862/ for sure,14:12
jeremyfreudbergok, makes sense14:12
toskyand also https://review.opendev.org/#/c/713752/ if we want14:12
jeremyfreudbergi will keep an eye especially on 713862 so it can merge timely14:12
jeremyfreudberg#topic open discussion14:13
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: sahara)"14:13
toskyvery quickly: this sahara patch should go in, the docs job fails without: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/710658/14:14
toskyprobably some sphinx changes, I haven't investigated14:14
jeremyfreudbergthat looks fine to merge, but your question is still a good one14:14
toskyso, it seems we get that on the gates too14:14
toskyit's just we hadn't had a fresh patch14:15
jeremyfreudbergah ok14:15
toskyif you check https://review.opendev.org/#/c/638390/ and put aside the sahara-grenade failures, you can see the issue14:15
jeremyfreudbergok14:15
toskyalso, the py3 jobs are failing with a strange sqlalchemy error, but I haven't found out the reason yet (just noticed this night)14:15
jeremyfreudbergalright14:16
jeremyfreudbergok, i don't have anything else to mention14:17
toskynothing else from me14:18
jeremyfreudbergok, let's close it, thanks everyone!14:18
toskythanks, see you!14:19
jeremyfreudberg#endmeeting14:19
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/"14:20
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 19 14:19:59 2020 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:20
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2020/sahara.2020-03-19-14.00.html14:20
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2020/sahara.2020-03-19-14.00.txt14:20
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2020/sahara.2020-03-19-14.00.log.html14:20
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-314:20
tellesnobregasee you all14:20
*** tellesnobrega has left #openstack-meeting-314:20
*** jeremyfreudberg has left #openstack-meeting-314:20
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:24
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-314:26
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC14:29
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-314:31
*** sean-k-mooney has joined #openstack-meeting-314:32
*** artom has joined #openstack-meeting-314:40
*** jraju__ has quit IRC14:42
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:55
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC14:58
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-315:01
*** ricolin has quit IRC15:08
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-315:13
*** lpetrut has quit IRC15:23
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC15:28
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-315:29
*** njohnston_ has joined #openstack-meeting-315:30
*** lyarwood has joined #openstack-meeting-316:00
gibi#startmeeting nova16:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 19 16:00:07 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'16:00
gmanno/16:00
gibio/16:00
lyarwoodo/16:01
sean-k-mooneyo/16:02
gibilets get started16:02
gibi#topic Last meeting16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Last meeting (Meeting topic: nova)"16:02
*** bbowen has joined #openstack-meeting-316:02
gibi#link Minutes from last meeting: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-03-12-16.00.log.html16:02
gibigibi promised to follow up on the ML about the plans for a virtual PTG. This is still an open AP on gibi.16:02
gibiespecially as the fundation is now cancelled the physical Vancuver event16:03
gibianything else from the last meeting to bring back?16:03
gibi#topic Bugs (stuck/critical)16:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (stuck/critical) (Meeting topic: nova)"16:04
gibi No Critical bugs16:04
gibi#link 99 new untriaged bugs (-12 since the last meeting): https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New16:04
gibi    Thank you for started reducing our bug backlog. Please continue.16:04
gibigmann started an etherpad #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-bug-triage-ussuri16:05
* lyarwood clicks16:05
gmanni started by doing few bug triage for this week, hope to burn more next week.16:06
artomWhat are we supposed to note in the etherpad?16:06
gibirelevant ML thread #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-March/013413.html16:06
gmannbasica idea is collect the info or report like neutron does. but wihtout rotation. it will be many members doing at same time16:07
gmannin QA we do the same and in office hour we try to discuss few which need discussions or review if fix is ready etc16:08
gmannif that help ?16:08
artomSo basically if we're not sure about a bug, note it down in that etherpad?16:08
gmannyeah. we can add bugs which are triaged in that week to know weekly progress but that can be known from LP16:09
gibiI think it help to highlight relevan bugs or ask for help16:09
gmannexactly16:09
gibilet's try and see if it helps16:10
artomShould it become a recurring agenda item in meetings?16:10
*** maciejjozefczyk has quit IRC16:10
gibi#action gibi add bug report etherpad to the meeting as a topic16:10
gmanni think in nova channel more than meeting as it need discussions etc. meeting can just check how much we burned in that week,16:10
gibiI will link the pad for the next couple of meeting to socialize it16:11
gmannso status kind of check in meeting and detail discussion on channel ?16:11
artomYeah, maybe. Bugs are already a recurring item, so...16:11
gmannyeah16:11
gibigmann: yepp16:11
gibianything else about bug triage?16:11
gibimelwitt sent nova gate status mail to the ML http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-March/013393.html16:12
gibi    melwitt, lyarwood, gmann: Do you need help?16:12
gibiI saw good progress on the mentioned items16:12
gmanni will get tempest fix merge soon which occur randomly16:13
gmanndefault network one16:13
gibigmann: thanks16:13
lyarwoodyeah good progress on most of this16:13
lyarwoodstill a few issues to hunt down16:14
gibithank you all of you16:14
gibianything else regarding bugs?16:14
gibi#topic Release Planning16:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Release Planning (Meeting topic: nova)"16:14
gibiTwo weeks until "Final release for non-client libraries" (Apr 3.)16:15
gibido we have must have items in os-vif os-traits os-resource-classes to release?16:15
gibi#link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/os-vif+status:open16:15
gibi#link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/os-resource-classes+status:open16:15
gibi #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/os-traits+status:open16:15
sean-k-mooneyfor os-vif there is one feature that melonox is interested in16:16
gibibased on the silence and the emptiness of the review queue I guess the answer is no. But I will ask next week16:16
sean-k-mooneyhowever im not sure the ovs patchs have merged yet16:17
sean-k-mooneyso that is the main blocker to merging it16:17
gibisean-k-mooney: do you have a link?16:17
sean-k-mooneyso nothing that is not blocked on external factors16:17
sean-k-mooneyyep one sec16:17
sean-k-mooneyhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/705018/ and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/702857/ i think16:18
gibithanks16:18
gibianything else about the release?16:18
gibi#topic Stable Branches16:20
*** openstack changes topic to "Stable Branches (Meeting topic: nova)"16:20
gibilyarwood: anything newsworthy?16:20
lyarwoodwe've got a growing core backlog of reviews16:20
lyarwoodI'm going to work my way through the following if others can also take a look16:20
lyarwood#link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova+label:Code-Review%253D%252B2+branch:%255Estable/.*+status:open+NOT+is:reviewer+NOT+is:owner16:20
lyarwoodstable/pike should also be unblocked by https://review.opendev.org/#/c/713036/ btw16:21
lyarwoodrebasing changes on it now and will +W later once they are passing16:21
gibithanks16:21
gibi#topic Sub/related team Highlights16:22
*** openstack changes topic to "Sub/related team Highlights (Meeting topic: nova)"16:22
gibiPlacement (tetsuro)16:22
*** njohnston_ has quit IRC16:22
gibiI think the only open item is consumer_types16:23
gibiI saw some discussion between dansmith and melwitt about it16:23
gibiAPI (gmann)16:24
gmannone thing to share. i added two flavor API cleanup (removal of is_public flag  and id from create request) in api cleanup etherapd as discussed on channel with sean-k-mooney . - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-api-cleanup16:24
gmannidea is to collect these kind of cleanup and later in V or W we discuss what all should be done. and we do all those cleanup in single vesion bump same way we did in stein16:24
gibigmann: I guess these are items for Victoria16:24
gmannyeah or later16:24
gibiOK16:24
gibithanks for collecting them16:24
gibi#topic Stuck Reviews16:25
*** openstack changes topic to "Stuck Reviews (Meeting topic: nova)"16:25
gmannif anyone find such worthy cleanup to do but not worth for version bump, you can add in that etherpad16:25
gibinothing on the agenda. is there any stuck review to discuss?16:25
gibi#topic Open discussion16:26
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: nova)"16:26
gibi(gibi): I'm getting hit by RH-only patches recently as core-company diversity is low. Options? Opinions? (I'm just testing the waters here)16:27
gibiI'm totatlly fine getting those pings btw16:27
sean-k-mooneyya so i am trying to ping redhat cores to review before reaching out ot non redhaters16:28
stephenfinPersonally, I think core numbers are as much if not a bigger issue16:28
lyarwoodI think we are getting closer to having to drop the RH rule tbh16:28
lyarwoodand yes core numbers are also an issue at the moment16:29
sean-k-mooneythere is definetly a time zone aspect16:29
artomI kinda assumed the trifecta rule was implicitly dropped16:29
artomOut of sheer practicality16:29
sean-k-mooneygibi you tend to be around more offent then say alex16:30
sean-k-mooneyat least when im on16:30
artomWith Matt and Eric gone, it leaves only gibi and alex_xu, which is a massive burden to shoulder16:30
gibiartom: I don't think we dropped the rule not even technically16:30
lyarwoodyeah it wasn't dropped16:30
sean-k-mooneywe have not dropped it16:30
lyarwoodbut I think we are getting to a point now where we might have to16:30
lyarwoodbefore we drive gibi mad16:30
gmannin denver, it was discussed but not dropped.16:30
gmannwith current situation, it make sense to revisit it.16:31
stephenfinI think we need more cores first, tbh16:31
artomstephenfin, who though?16:31
gibistephenfin: I agree that both the number of cores and the diversity is a problem16:31
gibiif we want to keep the rule16:32
artomstephenfin, let's say lyarwood - he's still RH16:32
artomHow many consistent non-RH contributors are there who aren't already cores?16:32
gibibrinzhang_ expressed the wish to become a core16:33
gibiand he is not RH16:33
gibiafaik16:33
sean-k-mooneythere are peole like gmann who are sme in specific areas16:33
stephenfinI was trying to find brinzhang_'s NIC16:33
stephenfin*nick16:34
stephenfin:)16:34
stephenfinand also, yeah, there are a few SMEs16:34
sean-k-mooneyanother approch is to take the lutenit / subsystem maintainer model16:34
stephenfinthough increasingly few16:34
sean-k-mooneyi guess this is something we have to monitor but we are getting to a point where it will be hard to progress if maintian the current workflow.16:35
stephenfinPersonally, if there's a subsystem that doesn't have enough eyes on it already, it's unlikely we'll be able to find a maintainer that's up to scratch16:36
artomI guess it's for cores to decides between themselves - but as much I agreed with the trifecta rule when there was wider diversity, I'm not sure it still makes sense16:36
gmanntrue.16:36
gibiartom: tend to agree16:36
stephenfinIf someone's good enough to maintain a subsystem, they're good enough to chip in with the rest of it, IMO16:36
sean-k-mooneyone thing we did in os-vif was due to the lack of diversity/active review we have always taken a much more relaxed approch.16:37
gmannand it is always trust basis not to +2/+A the area or things you are not 100% sure.16:37
stephenfinyup, exactly ^16:37
gibiagree.16:37
artomsean-k-mooney, os-vif is much smaller in scope though16:37
stephenfinyeah, os-vif is tiny by comparison16:38
gibiOK. I will drop a mail to the ML about the RH only rule. We need at least a core consensus to remove that16:38
artomWe can do both though - relax the trifecta rule for now (not necessarily abolish - like, RH can still ping gibi or alex_xu for reviews, but gibi can feel free to say "just do it yourselves, I don't have bw"), while at the same time ramping up new non-RH cores16:38
sean-k-mooneyit is but size is not really relevent here. but ya lets continue on ML16:38
lyarwood+116:38
artomWith the intent to eventually re-instate the full trifecta rule16:38
stephenfinwe should also be looking for opportunities to minimise the amount of work we need to do16:39
artomAmen brother16:39
lyarwoodstephenfin: looking to rm -rf more code?16:39
gibi:)16:39
stephenfinWell, yeah. Marking the likes of the Xen and VMWare drivers as deprecated is a good step in the right direction IMO16:39
lyarwoodyup was just thinking of that16:40
gmannhiring more people in core team also encourage them to learn/help in other area too as stephenfin mentioned early, .16:40
lyarwoodthe cinder folks are going through the same process at the moment with their drivers FWIW16:40
stephenfinI don't care about them and if no one else does, rm -rf seems appropriate :)16:40
stephenfinthey're planning to keep them in tree though16:40
lyarwoodeven the unsupported ones?16:40
lyarwoodsorry I missed that16:40
lyarwoodanyway that's OT16:40
sean-k-mooneylyarwood: yes until they casue a breakage in the ci16:40
gmannthey have removal rule also which recently merged16:41
gmannyeah CI health is one criteria16:41
lyarwoodyeah sorry that's what I was thinking by unsupported, CI broken etc.16:41
sean-k-mooneywe dont have a ci for xen or vmware right now so i guess it cant break it16:41
gmannbut cinder has too many compare to nova16:41
* stephenfin would put money on Xen not being functional out of the box today16:42
dansmithsean-k-mooney: vmware ci has been started back up, but I've only seen it fail :)16:42
gibithere is some work ongoing around the vmware CI, dansmith saw some votes coming in16:42
sean-k-mooneydansmith: oh good to know16:42
stephenfinnice one16:42
sean-k-mooneythat proably means we work something while it was offline16:43
sean-k-mooneyalthough it could just be problems with the initall setup16:43
gibiOK any other open discussion topic before we run out of time?16:43
dansmithI think it's highly unlikely that all the placement and resource stuff works as expected with either of those drivers at this point16:43
sean-k-mooneyon a related note im not sure we are going to start any of the numa in placmenet stuff this cycle.16:44
gibiif not then I'm fine continue discussing cores and drivers16:44
sean-k-mooneyim hoping to take a look at it after cyborg stuff merges16:44
sean-k-mooneybut i expect that to mainly happen in Victoria at this point16:44
gibiyeah cyborg has higher on my list too16:44
stephenfinsean-k-mooney: unlikely. bauzas has more important stuff on his plate atm I think /o\16:44
sean-k-mooneyso that basically just a heads up that that will slip16:45
sean-k-mooneyin terms of cyborg16:45
sean-k-mooneydo we know if sundar is around much longer16:45
dansmithI was just talking to him,m16:45
dansmithhe has one week left to push,16:46
dansmithbut also really wants to argue about useless comments16:46
dansmithso...some work will be done, but we'll see how much16:46
sean-k-mooneyok16:46
dansmithafter that we'll need someone to pick up ownership of it16:46
dansmithwhich I can do, but I'd rather it be you so I can keep reviewing16:46
sean-k-mooneyya16:47
sean-k-mooneyi can swap to adressing the comments if needed16:47
sean-k-mooneybut ill leave it to sundar while he is about16:47
dansmithyep16:48
gibisounds like a plan :)16:48
gibianything else to discuss?16:48
gibithen thank you for joining today!16:49
gibi#endmeeting16:49
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/"16:49
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 19 16:49:34 2020 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:49
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-03-19-16.00.html16:49
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-03-19-16.00.txt16:49
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-03-19-16.00.log.html16:49
*** sean-k-mooney has left #openstack-meeting-316:51
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC17:10
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-317:18
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC18:15
*** rubasov has quit IRC18:46
*** rubasov has joined #openstack-meeting-318:53
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting-319:02
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-319:19
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC19:28
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-319:29
*** maciejjozefczyk has quit IRC19:40
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting-319:41
*** bbowen has quit IRC19:57
*** bbowen has joined #openstack-meeting-319:58
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC20:03
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-320:05
*** maciejjozefczyk has quit IRC20:06
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC20:14
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-320:16
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC20:19
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC20:22
*** bbowen has quit IRC20:45
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-320:46
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC21:04
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-321:08
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:15
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-321:16
*** e0ne has quit IRC21:22
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:23
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-321:23
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:40
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-321:41
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:47
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-321:47
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:54
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-321:57
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC21:59
*** raildo has quit IRC22:02
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-322:02
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC22:05
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-322:05
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC22:13
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-322:17
*** zigo has quit IRC22:22
*** bbowen has joined #openstack-meeting-322:27
*** zigo has joined #openstack-meeting-322:31
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC22:36
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-322:37
*** slaweq has quit IRC22:45
*** apetrich has quit IRC22:50
*** macz_ has quit IRC23:01

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!