Wednesday, 2020-12-02

*** mlavalle has quit IRC00:56
*** vesper11 has joined #openstack-meeting-301:09
*** hemanth_n has joined #openstack-meeting-302:22
*** psahoo has joined #openstack-meeting-306:15
*** psahoo has quit IRC07:26
*** psahoo has joined #openstack-meeting-307:31
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-307:38
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-307:56
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-308:03
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-309:05
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-310:57
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting-311:50
*** e0ne has quit IRC12:40
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting-312:46
*** vesper11 has quit IRC12:53
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-meeting-313:03
*** psahoo has quit IRC13:06
*** psahoo has joined #openstack-meeting-313:11
*** hemanth_n has quit IRC13:23
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-313:34
*** haleyb has quit IRC13:46
*** Luzi has quit IRC13:51
*** liuyulong has joined #openstack-meeting-313:57
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting-314:13
*** raildo has quit IRC14:19
*** genekuo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-314:27
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting-314:27
*** mdelavergne has joined #openstack-meeting-314:53
ttxo/15:00
ttx#startmeeting large_scale_sig15:00
openstackMeeting started Wed Dec  2 15:00:32 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: large_scale_sig)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'large_scale_sig'15:00
ttx#topic Rollcall15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Rollcall (Meeting topic: large_scale_sig)"15:00
mdelavergneHi o/15:00
ttxWho is here for the Large Scale SIG meeting ?15:00
genekuo_Hi o/15:00
ttxamorin is probably busy. If not, he should be15:01
ttxbelmoreira: maybe around?15:01
belmoreirao/15:02
belmoreirathanks for the ping15:02
ttxhoping to see imtiaz soon15:02
ttxAlright, lets get started15:02
ttxOur agenda for today is at:15:02
ttx#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting15:02
*** imtiazc has joined #openstack-meeting-315:03
ttxchecking for late-added agenda items15:03
ttx#topic Review previous meetings action items15:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Review previous meetings action items (Meeting topic: large_scale_sig)"15:03
ttx"ttx to refactor wiki and other etherpads into that "journey" FAQ view"15:03
ttxSo... I did reorganize all pages under:15:03
ttx#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Large_Scale_SIG15:03
ttxIf you have a look... you can see, I split everything into 4 subpages, one for each stage of the journey15:04
ttxFor each subpage there is a FAQ, a few resources links15:04
ttx+ a section on other SIG work pertaining to that stage15:04
jpwardo/15:04
genekuo_Yeah I saw that, I'll be adding something to those pages before the next meeting15:04
ttxjpward: hi! welcome15:04
liuyulongHi15:05
ttxyes, please feel free to add questions, answers or links relevant to the stage15:05
ttxliuyulong: hi!15:05
genekuo_Hi, seeing new people15:05
ttxI'll finish reviewing previous point and we'll do an introduction round15:05
ttxAt our next meeting we'll review each stage contents, so please spend some time reviewing those in the next two weeks!15:05
ttx#action all to review pages under https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Large_Scale_SIG in preparation for next meeting15:06
ttxAlso let me know if you have trouble logging into the wiki.15:06
ttxThe goal being, anyone in the SIG should feel free to update those pages, not just me15:06
ttxcomments on that point?15:06
genekuo_The structure looks pretty good to me15:07
imtiazcThe 4 categories look good. Could we add "upgrade" story as well?15:07
ttximtiazc: hi! I feel like like upgrade is an orthogonal concern at each stage15:07
ttxunless we add it as a 5th stage15:08
ttxlike, once you have scaled out, how the hell do you upgrade?15:08
imtiazcexactly. It does become quite challenging.15:08
genekuo_I probably can add that maybe next year, we're planning on doing that15:08
genekuo_Should be a lot of pain15:09
ttxI like the idea of a 5th stage. does that make sense to you mdelavergne, belmoreira ?15:09
ttxI mean, if upgrading at high scale has unique constraints, it makes sense for us to document it15:10
mdelavergnemmh yep !15:10
mdelavergneupgrade/maintain ?15:10
ttxOK, I'll create a skeleton page15:10
ttx"rinse, repeat"15:10
ttx#action ttx to add 5th stage around upgrade and maintain scaled out systems in operation15:11
liuyulongconfiguration tunning means you need to restart/reload/respawn the processes/servies/agents and so on, so looks like a upgrade already. : )15:11
ttxok, next action item from last meeting was...15:11
ttx"genekuo to review/approve https://review.opendev.org/#/c/755069/"15:11
ttxThat's done15:11
ttxthen... "ttx to set up release jobs and request a 0.1 release"15:11
ttx(for oslo.metrics)15:12
imtiazcBy upgrade, I meant moving from one OpenStack release to another.15:12
ttxI did that:15:12
ttx#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/76398615:12
ttx#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/76463115:12
genekuo_I've checked the PR seems one of them is blocked by CI15:12
ttxrelease should be processed very soon now, maybe today15:12
ttxerr, failed again. Will have a look :)15:12
ttx#action ttx to make sure oslo.metrics 0.1 is released15:13
ttx"ttx to reschedule meeting to be biweekly on Wednesdays, 15utc"15:13
ttxThat's done: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Large_Scale_SIG_Meeting15:13
genekuo_I'll start working on oslo.messaging code once 0.1 is released15:13
ttxand finally... "all to think about how to improve how we collect feedbackPTG/Summit postmortem"15:13
ttxwe'll discuss that in this meeting after the round of intros15:13
ttx#topic Introducing new SIG members15:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Introducing new SIG members (Meeting topic: large_scale_sig)"15:14
ttxI see two new faces, would be good to introduce ourselves and our interest in the Large Scale SIG15:14
ttxI'll start15:14
ttxI'm Thierry Carrez, VP Engineering at the now Open Infrastructure Foundation. I'm helping drive this group because I have an interest in getting large users to contribute their experience running openstack, and receive lots of questions from users that worry about the scaling journey and would very much like that we have great answers to that15:14
ttx(yes, I copied last week's intro)15:15
liuyulongHi, my name is LIU Yulong, I'm the core of Neutron project. So I just want to see how many scale issue/pains you guys see on Neutron. : )15:15
genekuo_Hi, I'm Gene Kuo, working at LINE as Infrastructure engineer. Our team have been developing and operating OpenStack based private clouds to run our services.15:15
ttxliuyulong: neutron is definitely a hot topic around here15:15
ttxespecially since rabbitMQ started to behave a bit more sanely lately15:15
genekuo_I also copied last weeks intro.15:15
genekuo_I probably cannot give a lot of feedback regarding neutron as we implemented our own plugins15:16
mdelavergneHi, I'm Marie Delavergne, PhD student working on large scale Openstacks :)15:16
ttxNeutron is often the first scaling pain point, so we appreciate you visiting!15:16
liuyulongYes, I know that.15:16
liuyulongI'm working at China Unicom now. We have some large deployment for public cloud.15:17
ttxjpward: care to introduce yourself and tell us what you're interested in?15:17
jpwardI'm John Ward, and I work for Global InfoTek, we have a number of different openstack deployments, the largest one that I am working on is a 15k core but looking to continue scaling.15:18
ttxnice! I suspect it's already made of multiple clusters?15:18
ttxor cells or..15:18
jpwardglad to be here, I bring some experience working on even larger cloud Rackspace public cloud is my previous experience15:19
jpwardcurrently we don't have cells implemented, but that is on the road map15:19
ttxNice, very interested in hearing how your scaling went so far !15:20
genekuo_Cool, nice to meet you15:20
ttxSo, for today's meeting we planned to discuss how to best collect feedback from experienced operators15:20
ttx#topic How to best collect feedback from experienced operators?15:20
*** openstack changes topic to "How to best collect feedback from experienced operators? (Meeting topic: large_scale_sig)"15:20
ttxas I said a couple of weeks ago, during Victoria cycle we tried to use etherpads to collect scaling stories, then curate them onto a wiki page15:21
ttxThat was not very successful.15:21
ttx(understatement of 2020)15:21
ttxIn contrast, we had several people sharing at our Opendev and Forum sessions around scaling15:21
ttxSo I was wondering if we should not change our strategy there15:21
ttxRather than run opendev and forum sessions about scaling, in hope that people will join the SIG and share more...15:21
imtiazcI am Imtiaz Chowdhury. I am the Cloud Architect for Workday. At Workday, we have 45 clusters running over 9K hypervisors and now close to 500K core. The deployment size is expected to double next year.15:22
ttxMaybe we should run events specifically to collect those experiences, and not expect people to join the SIG afterwards15:22
ttxor fill an etherpad15:22
ttxWhat's your view on that?15:22
genekuo_Yes that what I also think15:22
genekuo_It's hard to get people fill out etherpad after work15:22
ttx(i mean, if people jion the SIG as regular members, that's awesome, but we should collect their scaling story without expecting them to join first)15:23
genekuo_I think an event with in OpenInfra summit and OpsMeetup is the best place to gather information15:23
ttxAlso it's hard to write and easier to just discuss15:23
imtiazcEtherpad or any tool that allows collaborative editing: Google docs, Wiki15:23
ttxSo how about...15:24
genekuo_People tend to get more active when there's event or deadline15:24
ttxWe build a schedule of regular Large Scale SIG events (think ~ every 2 months)15:24
ttxpiggybacking on existing events (forum, opendev, ops meetup) if available, or running our own if not15:24
ttxand use that to ask specific questions and collect output15:25
genekuo_I will suggest piggybacking at first15:25
genekuo_And advertise it to some event you can join even if you are not currently running large scale15:25
ttxgenekuo_: yes but there isn;t much planned in the coming months. I have to doublecheck what the OpsMettup has planned15:25
ttxOther suggestions included:15:26
ttx- Leverage superuser nominations to extract knowledge15:26
genekuo_but planning to scale in the future15:26
ttx- Reach out to past speakers that spoke on scaling15:26
ttx- Engage with Chinese users15:26
ttxso, more direct or narrow outreach15:26
liuyulongNeutron team has a mechanism that will enable a deputy each week to collect/filter the bugs.15:26
liuyulong#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/018782.html15:27
liuyulongFor instance ^15:27
imtiazcI like those suggestions.15:27
liuyulongSo maybe this SIG can add such routine for collecting the scale related infromations.15:27
liuyulongAnd feedback a mail to the community.15:27
ttxliuyulong: that sounds good15:27
ttxSuperuser nominations, next round is a bit far away15:27
imtiazcIs there a way we could facilitate connecting different large scale operators?15:28
ttxbut we could try to identify past summit talks on scaling15:28
ttxand reach out to speakers15:28
genekuo_Previous superuser nominations also will work15:28
ttx(in addition to actually extractign info from the video content)15:28
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting-315:28
genekuo_I can help out reaching directly to those user if man power is needed.15:29
ttxRe: old scaling presentations, I'll create an etherpad where we can dump out findings, organized per event15:29
ttxI think that's a good resource to link to in our various stages page anyway15:30
ttx#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/large-scale-sig-scaling-videos15:30
genekuo_I can pick up some of those videos once the list is complete15:31
genekuo_I'll pick up listing for Shanghai15:33
genekuo_Will do others if I have additional time15:33
ttxIf you have a few cycles, please assign yourself one of the summits and do a quick search for scale-related presentations15:34
ttxIf you watch any, feel free to drop notes and remarks on the etherpad too15:34
ttx#action all to help in filling out https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/large-scale-sig-scaling-videos15:34
ttxI'll check out the Ops meetups future plans15:35
ttx#action ttx to check out Ops meetups future plans15:35
imtiazcI shall look at Virtual summit and Denver. I shall also add the past scaling presentation we did from Workday15:35
ttximtiazc: great, thanks15:35
ttxas far as Chinese users go, I'll defer to Chinese contributors. It feels like we get a lot of engagement when we use China-specific social media15:36
ttxso I was wondering if we could use that to ask simple questions from large scale deployments in China15:36
ttxam open to suggestions on how to best proceed theer15:37
ttxthere*15:37
imtiazcI am not sure about that. Could we get some help from Jonathan Bryce or Mark C here? They seem to at least have contacts of the large operators and sponsors from China15:38
genekuo_hmm, I can ask Rico if he can help15:38
genekuo_ricolin15:38
ttxThat suggestion was actually from Rico :)15:39
genekuo_yeah I know15:39
ttxOK, that sounds like great first steps. Any other suggestions?15:40
ttxAlright then, moving on to next topic15:41
ttx#topic Next meeting15:41
*** openstack changes topic to "Next meeting (Meeting topic: large_scale_sig)"15:41
ttxOur next meeting will be December 16.15:41
ttx(Then we'll skip, and have the one after that on January 13)15:41
*** lpetrut has quit IRC15:41
ttxThe main topic for that next meeting will be to review all stages, and identify simple tasks to do a first pass at improving those pages15:41
jpwardsame time on the 16th?15:41
ttxyes15:41
genekuo_I'm ok15:42
mdelavergneok15:42
ttxSo between now and then, please check out the base content at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Large_Scale_SIG and think a bit on how we can do a first pass at improving that15:42
ttxI bet there are a few easy question/answers we could add15:43
genekuo_yep15:43
ttxLike, put yourself back into that stage of your own scaling story, and answer one of your own early questions you had15:43
ttx#topic Open discussion15:44
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: large_scale_sig)"15:44
ttxThat is all we had on the agenda... Is there anything else you would like to discuss?15:44
genekuo_Nope :)15:44
jpwardnice meeting everyone, nothing else from me15:44
imtiazcI have a question on deployment story15:44
ttxIf not, I'll wrap up now and post the summary. We have a bunch of actions to work on between now and next meeting15:44
ttximtiazc: yes?15:45
imtiazcWhat deployment tools work best for large scale deployment? We are aware of limitations of TripleO but not so sure about Kolla.15:45
genekuo_We currently write our own Ansible script and separate compute nodes to different host groups15:47
ttxI heard good things of OpenStack-Ansible, but i don't run a deployment myself. What do you all use, if anything?15:47
ttxjpward, belmoreira, liuyulong: any specific tooling?15:48
jpwardWe are using salt for our deployment currently, I have used OSA and TripleO in the past15:48
imtiazc We are currently using community forked Chef based tools with some home grown tools.15:48
ttxwow lots of homegrown tools15:48
ttxI thought there was more convergence toward community deployment tools, but maybe I imagined things15:50
imtiazcttx: Do you think "deployment" story could be added as stage zero to the list of categories?15:50
genekuo_I personally use kolla-ansible for my own cluster before and have good experience with it, but the scale is very small15:50
ttxjpward: I had an unrelated question, how did you learn about the SIG?15:51
jpwardI run across the wiki site one day when searching for something else15:52
ttxah? funny15:53
mdelavergneunexpected15:53
ttxyeah usually people can't find anything in the wiki15:54
*** slaweq has quit IRC15:54
ttxalright, if nothing else...15:54
ttxLet's continue the discussion at our next meeting15:54
mdelavergneI like the idea of deployment as stage zero!15:54
belmoreirasorry... couldn't follow the meeting... fighting some fires15:55
ttxmdelavergne: we'll end up writing a complete guide to openstack :)15:55
mdelavergneahah15:55
ttxbelmoreira: it's ok, you can catch up with the logs15:55
ttxbelmoreira: I should know that, but do you use a specific deployment tooling to handle the CERRN deployment?15:56
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-315:56
ttxCERN*15:56
belmoreirafor configuration management we use puppet15:56
belmoreirawe deploy OpenStack using puppet15:57
ttxusing the openstack-puppet upstream stuff?15:57
liuyulongOur operators use ansible, but the templates are written by them, not the openstack ansible.15:57
belmoreirayes, openstack-puppet15:57
ttxalright, thanks everyone, time to move to.. another meeting15:57
ttx#endmeeting15:57
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/"15:57
genekuo_Thank you all today15:57
openstackMeeting ended Wed Dec  2 15:57:55 2020 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:57
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/large_scale_sig/2020/large_scale_sig.2020-12-02-15.00.html15:57
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/large_scale_sig/2020/large_scale_sig.2020-12-02-15.00.txt15:58
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/large_scale_sig/2020/large_scale_sig.2020-12-02-15.00.log.html15:58
mdelavergnethanks everyone, see you on the 16th!15:58
jpwardthanks everyone15:58
*** liuyulong has quit IRC15:58
*** mdelavergne has quit IRC15:58
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-316:33
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:51
*** psahoo has quit IRC17:16
*** artom has quit IRC17:38
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-317:41
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-318:09
*** belmoreira has quit IRC18:34
*** elod has left #openstack-meeting-318:54
*** artom has joined #openstack-meeting-319:15
*** e0ne has quit IRC19:16
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-319:50
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:11
*** vesper11 has joined #openstack-meeting-320:15
*** vesper has joined #openstack-meeting-320:19
*** vesper11 has quit IRC20:19
*** lpetrut has quit IRC20:29
*** vesper has quit IRC21:06
*** vesper11 has joined #openstack-meeting-321:30
*** raildo has quit IRC21:40
*** slaweq has quit IRC23:02
*** macz_ has quit IRC23:16

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!