| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:05 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 01:15 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 04:05 | |
| *** psahoo has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:09 | |
| *** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:18 | |
| *** manubk has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 04:52 | |
| *** njohnston has quit IRC | 05:54 | |
| *** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 05:54 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:03 | |
| *** psahoo has quit IRC | 06:09 | |
| *** psahoo has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:17 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:19 | |
| *** BakaKuna has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 06:53 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:22 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 07:40 | |
| *** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:44 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:51 | |
| *** benj_ has quit IRC | 07:52 | |
| *** benj_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 07:56 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 08:01 | |
| *** benj_ has quit IRC | 08:09 | |
| *** benj_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:36 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:38 | |
| *** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:46 | |
| *** benj_ has quit IRC | 08:51 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 08:59 | |
| *** benj_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:06 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 09:07 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 09:20 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 09:52 | |
| *** psahoo has quit IRC | 10:02 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:07 | |
| *** ttx has quit IRC | 10:08 | |
| *** DinaBelova has quit IRC | 10:08 | |
| *** ttx has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:09 | |
| *** DinaBelova has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:09 | |
| *** fungi has quit IRC | 10:13 | |
| *** mugsie has quit IRC | 10:13 | |
| *** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:14 | |
| *** mugsie has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:14 | |
| *** benj_ has quit IRC | 10:14 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 10:14 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 10:14 | |
| *** ricolin has quit IRC | 10:14 | |
| *** srwilkers has quit IRC | 10:14 | |
| *** dansmith has quit IRC | 10:14 | |
| *** benj_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:16 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:16 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:16 | |
| *** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:16 | |
| *** srwilkers has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:16 | |
| *** dansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:16 | |
| *** benj_ has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
| *** freerunner has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
| *** bnemec has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
| *** mjturek has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
| *** mdbooth has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
| *** ganso has quit IRC | 10:17 | |
| *** benj_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:17 | |
| *** fnordahl has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** purplerbot has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** otherwiseguy has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** andreaf has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** Adri2000 has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** manubk has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** halali_ has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** lifeless has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** amorin has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** bcafarel has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** andy_ has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** srwilkers has quit IRC | 10:18 | |
| *** manubk has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** fnordahl has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** halali_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** bcafarel has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** purplerbot has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** amorin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** andy_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:20 | |
| *** freerunner has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:21 | |
| *** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:21 | |
| *** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:21 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:21 | |
| *** mdbooth has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:21 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 10:21 | |
| *** priteau has quit IRC | 10:21 | |
| *** njohnston has quit IRC | 10:21 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 10:21 | |
| *** BakaKuna has quit IRC | 10:21 | |
| *** ganso has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:24 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:24 | |
| *** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:24 | |
| *** BakaKuna has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:24 | |
| *** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:24 | |
| *** trident has quit IRC | 10:27 | |
| *** kklimonda_ has quit IRC | 10:27 | |
| *** kklimonda has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:27 | |
| *** trident has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:27 | |
| *** srwilkers has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:33 | |
| *** Luzi has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:34 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 10:45 | |
| *** markmcclain has quit IRC | 11:02 | |
| *** manubk has quit IRC | 11:17 | |
| *** psahoo has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:20 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 11:21 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 11:46 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 11:51 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:08 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 12:08 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:32 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 12:42 | |
| *** genekuo has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 12:44 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 12:49 | |
| *** genekuo has quit IRC | 13:08 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:14 | |
| *** ricolin has quit IRC | 13:28 | |
| *** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:30 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:32 | |
| *** artom has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:36 | |
| *** Luzi has quit IRC | 13:46 | |
| *** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:56 | |
| *** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 13:59 | |
| slaweq | #startmeeting networking | 14:01 |
|---|---|---|
| openstack | Meeting started Tue May 25 14:01:19 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:01 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'networking' | 14:01 |
| mlavalle | o/ | 14:01 |
| slaweq | hi | 14:01 |
| obondarev | hi | 14:01 |
| ralonsoh | hi | 14:01 |
| bcafarel | o/ | 14:01 |
| njohnston | o/ | 14:02 |
| slaweq | #topic announcements | 14:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:02 | |
| slaweq | Xena cycle calendar https://releases.openstack.org/xena/schedule.html | 14:02 |
| slaweq | this week is Xena-1 milestone already | 14:02 |
| slaweq | (time flies :)) | 14:02 |
| slaweq | Xena-2 will be week of the Jul 12 | 14:02 |
| *** lajoskatona has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:03 | |
| lajoskatona | Hi | 14:03 |
| slaweq | Nomination for Y names' proposals is still open http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022383.html | 14:04 |
| slaweq | if You have any ideas, You can propose it there | 14:04 |
| slaweq | next one | 14:04 |
| *** manubk has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:05 | |
| slaweq | OpenStack SDK - r1.0 feature branch will be created, we should now propose new patches to that branch and cherry-pick for master: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022535.html | 14:05 |
| slaweq | so if You plan to propose something to SDK, please follow the process mentioned there | 14:05 |
| *** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:05 | |
| slaweq | and ask on the #openstack-sdks channel in case of any doubts :) | 14:05 |
| slaweq | and that's all annuncements from me for today | 14:06 |
| slaweq | do You have anything else to add? | 14:06 |
| bcafarel | OVN back as devstack default? I think I saw that merged this morning :) | 14:06 |
| slaweq | bcafarel: oh, really? I probably missed it | 14:07 |
| lajoskatona | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/791436 | 14:07 |
| lajoskatona | I think this one | 14:07 |
| bcafarel | thanks I was looking up in my history, yes this is the one I saw | 14:08 |
| slaweq | great :) | 14:08 |
| slaweq | thx for the info | 14:08 |
| obondarev | are we sure all CI jobs that are supposed to be testing OVS not testing OVN now? :) | 14:09 |
| ralonsoh | we should have the neutron-tempest-plugin problems again | 14:09 |
| slaweq | obondarev: I think we should check it to be sure | 14:09 |
| ralonsoh | we'll need https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/791255 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/791148 | 14:10 |
| slaweq | ralonsoh: thx for the links | 14:11 |
| lajoskatona | and these for some stadium: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522ovn-devstack%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+owner:%2522lajos+katona%2522 | 14:12 |
| slaweq | lajoskatona: thx for the links too | 14:12 |
| amotoki | one question: whta happens if some GRE user uses neutron-tempest-tests? | 14:12 |
| slaweq | I already +2'ed all of them, so please others check them too :) | 14:12 |
| lajoskatona | amotoki: What do you mean, downstream, or from opendev zuul? | 14:13 |
| slaweq | amotoki: those trunk tests should be skipped in such case | 14:13 |
| amotoki | slaweq: because the upstream testing env does not support it? | 14:14 |
| ralonsoh | we can always switch to OVS, if needed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/791417 | 14:14 |
| ralonsoh | or create a new CI job (not recommended) | 14:15 |
| slaweq | yes, at least according to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/791255/3/neutron_tempest_plugin/api/test_trunk.py#250 IIUC | 14:15 |
| amotoki | slaweq: okay. I have no strong opinion on it. | 14:16 |
| amotoki | if GRE users want to test these in their deployments, they should write their own tests. okay. | 14:16 |
| amotoki | I am not sure we really have these needs though. | 14:17 |
| slaweq | amotoki: but if someone is running those tests on env with GRE enabled, then it's not OVN backend | 14:17 |
| amotoki | slaweq: yes | 14:17 |
| amotoki | I am looking at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/791255/3/neutron_tempest_plugin/api/test_trunk.py#250 | 14:17 |
| slaweq | ok, I see Your point now | 14:17 |
| slaweq | we should make check in that L250 smarter | 14:18 |
| amotoki | I think it is part of the API tests, so they are backend agnostic. | 14:18 |
| slaweq | and aware of backend probably somehow | 14:18 |
| slaweq | I will open LP and will try to make it smarter | 14:20 |
| slaweq | but for now let's go with ralonsoh's patch to unblock the gate | 14:20 |
| slaweq | is that ok for You? | 14:20 |
| amotoki | slaweq: works for me :) | 14:20 |
| slaweq | thx | 14:20 |
| slaweq | and thx for raising that here | 14:20 |
| slaweq | ok, let's move on then | 14:21 |
| slaweq | #topic Blueprints | 14:21 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Blueprints (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:21 | |
| slaweq | I moved opened BPs to Xena-2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/xena-2 | 14:22 |
| slaweq | do You have any updates about any of them? | 14:22 |
| slaweq | I have only small update about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/secure-rbac-roles | 14:24 |
| slaweq | there is only few patches opened in the list https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522secure-rbac%2522+status:open+project:openstack/neutron | 14:24 |
| slaweq | thx for all reviews | 14:24 |
| slaweq | and please check those few which are missing approval | 14:24 |
| slaweq | after that I will check how to switch to new defaults in the devstack, so maybe we will be able to have one job running with them | 14:25 |
| slaweq | but I didn't explored yet how to do it | 14:25 |
| *** lajoskatona has quit IRC | 14:26 | |
| *** lajoskatona has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:26 | |
| lajoskatona | Please review these (I was disconnected in the meantime....) : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/785236 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/783791 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/767337 | 14:27 |
| slaweq | regarding liuyulong's BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/distributed-dhcp-for-ml2-ovs, we have also only few patches left https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%252Fdistributed-dhcp-for-ml2-ovs%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 14:27 |
| slaweq | thx lajoskatona for the links | 14:28 |
| lajoskatona | slaweq: Good that You mention it, in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/776567/22/neutron/conf/plugins/ml2/drivers/ovs_conf.py there's a new cfg option to enable ipv6 dhcp, | 14:28 |
| lajoskatona | I have some concenr as now IPv6 works out of the box (of course its more difficult as we need the infrastructure and othere cfg options) so that forks the API between "traiditonal" dhcp in Neutron and the new OVS based dhcp | 14:30 |
| lajoskatona | Please check if my feeling regarding this new cfg is incorrect, I can leave with it but we have to guard it with doc in that case | 14:30 |
| slaweq | lajoskatona: actually I think it's good point, I'm not sure why this config option is really needed | 14:32 |
| slaweq | it should works fine for the IPv6 subnets with DHCP stateful mode | 14:33 |
| slaweq | as dhcp agent works currently | 14:33 |
| lajoskatona | +1 | 14:34 |
| obondarev | I guess user might prefer to disable IPv6 DHCP if IPv6 is not used | 14:34 |
| obondarev | just to not overload flow tables | 14:35 |
| mlavalle | that makes sense | 14:35 |
| obondarev | for no good reason | 14:35 |
| slaweq | so rules could be added in the lazy way - when first such subnet would appear on the node | 14:35 |
| slaweq | but maybe it's not as easy to implement, idk | 14:35 |
| slaweq | just thinking loud now | 14:35 |
| obondarev | makes sense, but still - even existence of IPv6 subnets may not mean user wants DHCP.. | 14:36 |
| lajoskatona | Yeah, so perhaps it's the best solution, but than the doc should highlight it | 14:36 |
| obondarev | +1 | 14:36 |
| slaweq | obondarev: but I think about existence of the IPv6 subnet with dhcp mode DHCP stateful | 14:36 |
| obondarev | slaweq, got it, agree | 14:37 |
| slaweq | which means that user wants to have dhcp v6 provided :) | 14:37 |
| slaweq | for SLAAC it's not needed | 14:37 |
| slaweq | I'm not sure about dhcpv6-stateless now | 14:37 |
| haleyb | that's SLAAC for addressing and DHCP for other bits, so could be needed there | 14:39 |
| slaweq | yeah, probably | 14:39 |
| obondarev | I think maybe config might be set to True by default, and document the ability to disable it with OVS DHCP extension | 14:39 |
| slaweq | obondarev: that can also be possibility | 14:39 |
| slaweq | anyway, let's continue that discussion in the gerrit | 14:39 |
| lajoskatona | +1 | 14:40 |
| slaweq | :) | 14:40 |
| obondarev | thus we'll preserve current behavior and no need for additional logic | 14:40 |
| obondarev | ok :) | 14:40 |
| slaweq | let's move on here | 14:40 |
| slaweq | #topic Bugs | 14:40 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:40 | |
| slaweq | bcafarel was bug deputy last week. Report http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022674.html | 14:40 |
| bcafarel | all good overall (either bugs are already fixed or in progress) | 14:41 |
| bcafarel | I just wanted to highlight https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929197 which would benefit from an OVN check | 14:42 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1929197 in neutron "[OVN] SB connection unreliable" [Undecided,New] | 14:42 |
| ralonsoh | I'll take a look at this one this week | 14:43 |
| slaweq | ralonsoh++ thx | 14:43 |
| bcafarel | ralonsoh: thanks I could not reproduce it and mentioned change should not have such visible impact, but better safe than sorry :) | 14:43 |
| ralonsoh | for sure | 14:44 |
| slaweq | thx bcafarel for the report | 14:44 |
| slaweq | any other bugs anyone wants to discuss today? | 14:44 |
| ralonsoh | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/792945, please, +2 it again | 14:45 |
| slaweq | ralonsoh: done :) | 14:46 |
| ralonsoh | thanks | 14:46 |
| slaweq | yw :) | 14:48 |
| slaweq | thx for proposing patch to unblock the gate so fast :) | 14:48 |
| slaweq | this week I'm bug deputy | 14:48 |
| obondarev | +1 | 14:48 |
| slaweq | so I'm already aware :) | 14:48 |
| mlavalle | Good | 14:48 |
| bcafarel | slaweq: just in case, don't forget to send yourself a reminder :) | 14:49 |
| slaweq | bcafarel: sure :D | 14:49 |
| slaweq | ok, let's move on | 14:49 |
| slaweq | #topic On Demand Agenda | 14:49 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "On Demand Agenda (Meeting topic: networking)" | 14:49 | |
| slaweq | there is one topic here for today | 14:49 |
| slaweq | Feedback on Freenode situation http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022675.html | 14:49 |
| slaweq | gmann asked about feedback from various teams about what we would like to do | 14:50 |
| obondarev | google hangouts :D | 14:50 |
| bcafarel | ah yes, quite the hot topic since last week | 14:50 |
| slaweq | in the etherpad https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/feedback-on-freenode there are basically 2 options possible | 14:50 |
| slaweq | Option1: Ok with the TC's approach of "let's wait more and monitor the situation to make any decision." | 14:50 |
| slaweq | Option2: We want to move away from Freenode right now. | 14:50 |
| gmann | slaweq: thanks for bringing it | 14:50 |
| slaweq | btw. I hope all of You are aware about what is the problem with freenode now, right? | 14:51 |
| slaweq | gmann: yw :) | 14:51 |
| ralonsoh | yeah | 14:51 |
| lajoskatona | yeah | 14:51 |
| ralonsoh | IMO, option 2 and swap to another IRC | 14:51 |
| slaweq | so I wanted to ask You about Your opinion on that | 14:51 |
| slaweq | so I we update that etherpad | 14:51 |
| slaweq | *so We can update | 14:52 |
| gmann | note, we do not have any finalized platform/network yet | 14:52 |
| * obondarev votes for opt 1 | 14:52 | |
| gmann | in option1 we are not saying we will stay at freenode but we will wait and see the situation more and then decide | 14:53 |
| lajoskatona | +1 on Opt. 1, (the hesitant guy) | 14:53 |
| bcafarel | initially I was for option1 (aka we can wait), but some examples of the "new management" + seeing many projects and users already moved changed my mind | 14:53 |
| slaweq | maybe I will ask a bit different question - do we have anyone who considers to stop using freenode and current neutron channel until it will not move out from freenode? | 14:53 |
| amotoki | I tend to vote for opt 1. From dev perspective, switching to another irc would not impact so much. we can compare more options and get avoid confusion. | 14:53 |
| ralonsoh | slaweq, no, not stop using neutron channel | 14:54 |
| ralonsoh | but not deferring the change | 14:54 |
| slaweq | ralonsoh: I was asking about if there is anyone who will simply say "I'm not going to use freenode so I will not be available on irc anymore, unless You will move to other server" | 14:55 |
| mlavalle | I also say option 1 | 14:55 |
| slaweq | if there are people who consider that, I will personally vote for option 2, otherwise I'm also for option 1 :) | 14:55 |
| mlavalle | we are not saying not move if we take option 1. we are saying let's find more | 14:56 |
| mlavalle | facts | 14:56 |
| mlavalle | and see how the situation evolves | 14:56 |
| gmann | exactly | 14:57 |
| bcafarel | I just hope end decision will be global to openstack (fragmentation--) I know devs/users on other opensource projets went that way (not going to use freenode either again), but I don't know for openstack and neutron specifically | 14:57 |
| obondarev | I just don't want to move 1 times :) | 14:57 |
| obondarev | 2 times * | 14:57 |
| lajoskatona | +1 | 14:57 |
| amotoki | +1 | 14:57 |
| slaweq | ok, so to summarize, neutron team is for option 1, let's wait a bit more and see how it will goes | 14:57 |
| manubk | +1 for option 1 | 14:57 |
| mlavalle | +1 | 14:57 |
| haleyb | +1 to avoid fragmentation, option 1 is fine assuming that | 14:58 |
| slaweq | I will update etherpad right now :) | 14:58 |
| slaweq | thx for all feedback there | 14:58 |
| mlavalle | and yeah, if we move, all openstack should move in one step | 14:58 |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 14:58 | |
| mlavalle | not fragmented | 14:58 |
| slaweq | that's all what I had for today | 14:59 |
| slaweq | and I think we can finish the meeting for today | 14:59 |
| slaweq | thx a lot for attending and great discussion | 15:00 |
| mlavalle | oh, we get 1 minute back \o/ | 15:00 |
| slaweq | have a great week :) | 15:00 |
| slaweq | mlavalle: sure :D | 15:00 |
| ralonsoh | bye | 15:00 |
| mlavalle | o/ | 15:00 |
| slaweq | #endmeeting | 15:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 15:00 | |
| slaweq | o/ | 15:00 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue May 25 15:00:19 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:00 |
| lajoskatona | bye | 15:00 |
| amotoki | o/ | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2021/networking.2021-05-25-14.01.html | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2021/networking.2021-05-25-14.01.txt | 15:00 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2021/networking.2021-05-25-14.01.log.html | 15:00 |
| *** manubk has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
| bcafarel | 1 minute back, that's a lot less than usual :p | 15:00 |
| slaweq | #startmeeting neutron_ci | 15:02 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue May 25 15:02:01 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:02 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:02 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ci' | 15:02 |
| slaweq | welcome (again) :) | 15:02 |
| bcafarel | o/ again | 15:02 |
| obondarev | hi | 15:02 |
| lajoskatona | o/ | 15:02 |
| slaweq | First of all Grafana dashboard: http://grafana.openstack.org/dashboard/db/neutron-failure-rate | 15:02 |
| slaweq | please open and we can move on | 15:02 |
| ralonsoh | hi | 15:02 |
| slaweq | we don't have any action items from last week | 15:03 |
| slaweq | so let's skip that topic today | 15:03 |
| slaweq | #topic Stadium projects | 15:03 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Stadium projects (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:03 | |
| slaweq | lajoskatona: any updates about stadium ci? | 15:03 |
| lajoskatona | not much, only the ovs changes | 15:03 |
| lajoskatona | I mean the ones to use ovs explicitly | 15:03 |
| slaweq | those should be approved quickly I hope | 15:03 |
| slaweq | ok, so let's quickly move to the next topic than | 15:04 |
| slaweq | #topic Stadium projects | 15:05 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Stadium projects (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:05 | |
| slaweq | bcafarel: any updates/issues with stable branches? | 15:05 |
| bcafarel | all good from what I checked :) | 15:05 |
| bcafarel | (beware I still have a few unread emails, but so far so good) | 15:06 |
| slaweq | only good news so far :) | 15:06 |
| slaweq | that's great meeting | 15:06 |
| slaweq | thank You | 15:06 |
| slaweq | so let's move on to the next topic | 15:06 |
| slaweq | #topic Grafana | 15:06 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Grafana (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:06 | |
| slaweq | from graphs I think that neutron-tempest-dvr-ha-multinode-full job is not set to ovs explicitly | 15:07 |
| slaweq | and is now running with ML2/ovn | 15:07 |
| slaweq | as its failure rate is going up in exactly same way as neutron-tempest-plugin-api job :) | 15:08 |
| obondarev | :D | 15:08 |
| bcafarel | parent: tempest-multinode-full-py3 sounds like it yes | 15:08 |
| slaweq | obondarev: it's Your favorite job, can You check it? :) | 15:08 |
| obondarev | slaweq, I will :) | 15:09 |
| slaweq | thx a lot | 15:09 |
| obondarev | sure | 15:09 |
| slaweq | #action obondarev to check neutron-tempest-dvr-ha-multinode-full and switch it to ML2/OVS | 15:09 |
| slaweq | also neutron-rally-task job is in same situation | 15:09 |
| slaweq | but there is patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/791365 for that already | 15:10 |
| slaweq | but we will need neutron-tempest-plugin fix first | 15:10 |
| slaweq | and functional tests fix from ralonsoh | 15:10 |
| slaweq | that are all issues which I see on the grafana currently | 15:11 |
| slaweq | anything else You want to highlight maybe? | 15:12 |
| slaweq | ok, let's move on | 15:13 |
| slaweq | #topic fullstack/functional | 15:13 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "fullstack/functional (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:13 | |
| slaweq | I found only one new issue related to functional jobs | 15:13 |
| slaweq | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929518 | 15:13 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1929518 in neutron "Functional db migration tests broken" [Critical,Confirmed] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez) | 15:13 |
| slaweq | and ralonsoh already took care of it | 15:14 |
| slaweq | thx ralonsoh | 15:14 |
| ralonsoh | yw | 15:14 |
| slaweq | but now I think that we will need to combine it with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/791365 | 15:15 |
| slaweq | otherwise it will never pass gate :/ | 15:15 |
| slaweq | so we should: | 15:15 |
| slaweq | 1. merge fix for neutron-tempest-plugin-api job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/791255 | 15:16 |
| slaweq | 2. combine https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/792945 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/791365 into one patch | 15:16 |
| slaweq | and then we should be good | 15:16 |
| slaweq | or am I missing something here? | 15:16 |
| bcafarel | sounds right yes | 15:16 |
| ralonsoh | I vote for 1 | 15:17 |
| ralonsoh | that should solve neutron ci too | 15:17 |
| slaweq | ralonsoh: it's not two possibilities to choose | 15:17 |
| ralonsoh | right? | 15:17 |
| ralonsoh | I though that solved neutron CI too | 15:17 |
| slaweq | it's like action items to do and order of them :) | 15:17 |
| ralonsoh | my bad | 15:17 |
| slaweq | np :) | 15:18 |
| slaweq | obondarev: lajoskatona can You maybe check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/791255 ? | 15:18 |
| slaweq | and approve it hopefully | 15:18 |
| ralonsoh | we can update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/791365 then | 15:18 |
| slaweq | so that will be in the gate already | 15:18 |
| ralonsoh | I'll abandon my patch | 15:18 |
| slaweq | ralonsoh: as You want, You can also update Your patch and we can abandon mine :) | 15:19 |
| ralonsoh | don't worry, I'll update yours in a couple of mins | 15:19 |
| slaweq | thx a lot | 15:19 |
| obondarev | slaweq, ralonsoh, is it correct that alternative to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/791255 is to switch job API job to OVS? | 15:20 |
| ralonsoh | yes | 15:20 |
| slaweq | obondarev: yes | 15:20 |
| slaweq | actually I even had such patch proposed but I abandoned it | 15:20 |
| ralonsoh | there is an abandoned patch | 15:20 |
| ralonsoh | right | 15:20 |
| slaweq | as ralonsoh convinced me to go with his approach :) | 15:20 |
| obondarev | so that could avoid test skip, right? | 15:20 |
| ralonsoh | yes | 15:20 |
| ralonsoh | but, to be honest, the scope of this test is reduced | 15:21 |
| obondarev | so why not? :) | 15:21 |
| slaweq | there is only one test skipped and it should be soon available on ovn backend too | 15:21 |
| ralonsoh | because OVS is already tested, this feature is not frequently used and it will be integrated in OVN soon | 15:21 |
| obondarev | ok let me check, can continue meanwhile | 15:22 |
| ralonsoh | I prefer to check OVN. This feature has not received patches in a long time | 15:22 |
| lajoskatona | So wait with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/791255 ? | 15:23 |
| obondarev | actually no, I just approved it | 15:24 |
| obondarev | :) | 15:24 |
| bcafarel | :) | 15:24 |
| slaweq | thx :) | 15:24 |
| lajoskatona | ok | 15:24 |
| slaweq | ok, next topic then | 15:24 |
| slaweq | #topic Tempest/Scenario | 15:24 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Tempest/Scenario (Meeting topic: neutron_ci)" | 15:24 | |
| slaweq | I found one new (for me at least) issue recently | 15:24 |
| slaweq | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929523 | 15:25 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1929523 in neutron "Test tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_subnet_details is failing from time to time" [High,Confirmed] | 15:25 |
| slaweq | and failure examples | 15:25 |
| slaweq | https://fc42fc060b9d19761c9e-19b00ab3af46f59a1799d97d7ae09a21.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/783748/4/gate/neutron-ovn-tempest-slow/9dbdc07/testr_results.html | 15:25 |
| slaweq | https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_567/785895/1/gate/neutron-tempest-slow-py3/567fc7f/testr_results.html | 15:25 |
| slaweq | did You saw it already maybe? | 15:25 |
| slaweq | or anyone have cycles to check that? | 15:26 |
| ralonsoh | I think there is a patch from Candido | 15:26 |
| ralonsoh | let me check | 15:26 |
| ralonsoh | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/779756 | 15:27 |
| slaweq | so it didn't help :/ | 15:27 |
| slaweq | as it was merged 2 weeks ago | 15:27 |
| slaweq | and failures which I saw were from this week | 15:27 |
| ralonsoh | I'll ping him again, but I remember testing with him this patch | 15:28 |
| ralonsoh | and was quite solit | 15:28 |
| ralonsoh | solid* | 15:28 |
| slaweq | maybe it's a bit different issue? | 15:28 |
| ralonsoh | I don't think so, what we test is the content of resolv.conf | 15:29 |
| slaweq | in this case retrieved dns list is empty | 15:29 |
| slaweq | testtools.matchers._impl.MismatchError: {'1.2.3.4'} != set(): Looking for servers: ['1.2.3.4']. Retrieved DNS nameservers: [] From host: 172.24.5.177. | 15:29 |
| ralonsoh | hmmm maybe the host needs a bit of time | 15:29 |
| slaweq | and in Candido's patch description the issue was that additinal server was included | 15:29 |
| ralonsoh | ok, I'll ping him | 15:30 |
| slaweq | thx a lot | 15:30 |
| slaweq | #action ralonsoh to talk with ccamposr about issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1929523 | 15:31 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1929523 in neutron "Test tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_subnet_details is failing from time to time" [High,Confirmed] | 15:31 |
| slaweq | and that was all what I had for today :) | 15:32 |
| slaweq | periodic jobs are running fine | 15:32 |
| slaweq | do You have anything else to discuss today? | 15:32 |
| slaweq | or if not, I will give You 28 minutes back | 15:32 |
| bcafarel | nothing from me :) | 15:33 |
| ralonsoh | no thanks | 15:33 |
| obondarev | nope | 15:33 |
| slaweq | ok, thx for attending the meeting today | 15:34 |
| slaweq | see You all online :) | 15:34 |
| slaweq | o/ | 15:34 |
| bcafarel | o/ | 15:34 |
| lajoskatona | o/ | 15:34 |
| slaweq | #endmeeting | 15:34 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 15:34 | |
| ralonsoh | bye | 15:34 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue May 25 15:34:36 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:34 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2021/neutron_ci.2021-05-25-15.02.html | 15:34 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2021/neutron_ci.2021-05-25-15.02.txt | 15:34 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ci/2021/neutron_ci.2021-05-25-15.02.log.html | 15:34 |
| *** sean-k-mooney has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 15:57 | |
| gibi | #startmeeting nova | 16:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue May 25 16:00:09 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | 16:00 |
| stephenfin | o/ | 16:00 |
| sean-k-mooney | o/ | 16:00 |
| gibi | \o | 16:00 |
| bauzas | \o | 16:00 |
| gibi | lets soo how many of us got the memo :) | 16:00 |
| gibi | /soo/see | 16:00 |
| gmann | o/ | 16:00 |
| elod | o/ | 16:01 |
| gibi | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | 16:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (stuck/critical) (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:01 | |
| gibi | no critical bug | 16:01 |
| gibi | #link 9 new untriaged bugs (-3 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New | 16:01 |
| gibi | s/-3/+1/ sorry i forget to update that number | 16:02 |
| gibi | still we are pretty OK regarding the triage backlog | 16:02 |
| gibi | is there any specific bug we need to talk about today? | 16:02 |
| *** jlibosva has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
| gibi | #topic Gate status | 16:03 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Gate status (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:03 | |
| gibi | We have one gate issue reported by lyarwood #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1929446 | 16:04 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1929446 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "check_can_live_migrate_source taking > 60 seconds in CI" [Undecided,New] | 16:04 |
| *** obondarev has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
| * gibi haven't looked into it yet | 16:04 | |
| sean-k-mooney | ok so that could be just a slow node? | 16:05 |
| sean-k-mooney | but we might also need to consider should it use teh long rpc timeout | 16:05 |
| gibi | I don't know how frequent it is and lyarwood is not around | 16:05 |
| gibi | anyhow if somebody has time to check it a bit deeper then talk to Lee about it | 16:06 |
| bauzas | good luck for finding the reason | 16:06 |
| sean-k-mooney | if the agent is pasueing | 16:07 |
| sean-k-mooney | it could be doe to an internal lock like the libvirt proxy issue we had before | 16:07 |
| dansmith | o/ | 16:07 |
| sean-k-mooney | but ya it wont be striat forward to see why it stoped for ~82 seconds | 16:08 |
| gibi | would be nice to see how frequently we are hittig this issue. If it is infrequent then I might ignore it :) | 16:09 |
| dansmith | making that a long call rpc is just going to hide why that is happening, | 16:09 |
| dansmith | and if it shouldn't, I'm not sure that's good | 16:09 |
| dansmith | maybe it makes a blocking libvirt call? | 16:09 |
| gibi | dansmith: and also it is still tight to the sync API response | 16:09 |
| sean-k-mooney | dansmith: that is what i was wondering regardign the libvirt proxy apis | 16:10 |
| dansmith | ah, well, in that case definitely not | 16:10 |
| dansmith | sean-k-mooney: yeah I think there are some cases where libvirt can get hung up and then we block, IIRC | 16:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | there were i think we fixed the ones we knew of but there could be others | 16:10 |
| dansmith | right, I mean.. bugs. | 16:10 |
| sean-k-mooney | im not sure how to sech for this in kibana though | 16:11 |
| dansmith | probably don't need to hold up the meeting for this tho | 16:11 |
| sean-k-mooney | true | 16:11 |
| gibi | OK, moving on | 16:11 |
| gibi | Placement periodic job status #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly | 16:11 |
| gibi | they are green | 16:11 |
| gibi | is there any other gate issue we need to talk about? | 16:12 |
| gibi | oh one more thing. the default ovs->ovn switch in devstack has been merged again | 16:13 |
| gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/791436 | 16:13 |
| gibi | so we might see failure | 16:13 |
| gibi | as far as I know neutron got hit by it | 16:13 |
| gibi | if no other gate issue then | 16:14 |
| gibi | #topic Release Planning | 16:14 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Release Planning (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:14 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:14 | |
| gibi | Today is a spec review day. I see good progress on the spec reviews. Keep it coming! | 16:14 |
| gibi | we have M1 on Thursday. I think the only work we have is to approve the lib release patches if any | 16:15 |
| gibi | any othe release related topic? | 16:15 |
| gmann | I am still composing spec for POST servers on host, should be ready after 1 hr or so. | 16:15 |
| sean-k-mooney | gmann: ack | 16:16 |
| gibi | gmann: ack, no worries, we only do spec freeze at M2 | 16:16 |
| gmann | yeah just to get the review flow in spec day :) | 16:16 |
| sean-k-mooney | and we do not have a propsal freeze anymore | 16:16 |
| gibi | :) | 16:16 |
| gibi | #topic Stable Branches | 16:17 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Stable Branches (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:17 | |
| gibi | copyying elod's summary | 16:17 |
| gibi | stable/train branches were tagged with train-em today ( https://review.opendev.org/790761 ) | 16:17 |
| gibi | wallaby..rocky branches gates should be OK (merged patches in rocky, train, wallaby since the last meeting) | 16:17 |
| gibi | queens and pike gate not yet fixed (the devstack patch that fixed rocky's gate fails with some unit tests on queens and pike - https://review.opendev.org/791248 ) | 16:17 |
| gibi | EOM | 16:17 |
| sean-k-mooney | one thing to note | 16:18 |
| elod | I'll try to investigate the queens patch failure | 16:18 |
| gibi | elod: thanks | 16:18 |
| elod | (and pike) | 16:18 |
| sean-k-mooney | os-vifs stable gates are broken due to lower-constratins and hack/pep8 rules issues | 16:18 |
| sean-k-mooney | im going to try and fix those if i can | 16:18 |
| gmann | elod: for unit test fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/792048 | 16:18 |
| gmann | elod: this needs to be backported | 16:19 |
| elod | sean-k-mooney: I've fixed several like that, so if you need help... :) | 16:19 |
| sean-k-mooney | elod: ill ping you if i get stuck | 16:19 |
| elod | gmann: oh, thanks! I'll backport it then! | 16:19 |
| elod | sean-k-mooney: ++ | 16:19 |
| elod | maybe one more thing, | 16:19 |
| elod | I am planning to propose (multiple) ocata-eol patches | 16:20 |
| elod | as nova gate is broken for ~ a year | 16:20 |
| gmann | elod: did, and for queens/rocky I will cap the nodeset as they should not be running on Focal there https://review.opendev.org/q/Ie002faf4c96ac7f207207a481c057b8df0289e6c | 16:20 |
| elod | gmann: thanks! | 16:21 |
| gibi | anything else on stable? | 16:22 |
| elod | I think that's it from me | 16:22 |
| gibi | #topic Sub/related team Highlights | 16:23 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Sub/related team Highlights (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:23 | |
| gibi | Libvirt (bauzas) | 16:23 |
| bauzas | nothing to report, sir. Quiet period. | 16:23 |
| gibi | thanks | 16:24 |
| gibi | #topic Open discussion | 16:24 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: nova)" | 16:24 | |
| gibi | we have two topics | 16:24 |
| gibi | (artom) Follow up on the IRC meeting schedule change. | 16:24 |
| gibi | (I'm not sure this is not just a remainder from last week) | 16:24 |
| artom | Doh, forgot to take that off the wiki | 16:24 |
| artom | That was for last week | 16:24 |
| gibi | ack | 16:24 |
| gibi | I have one addendum | 16:24 |
| gibi | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022684.html | 16:24 |
| gibi | Sam requested a chinees friendly meeting slot | 16:25 |
| sean-k-mooney | restoring the bi weeksly alternet slots or an addtional one | 16:26 |
| gibi | If I chair a meeting once a month on Thurday 8:00 UTC, how many of you would join.(looking at folks from EU) | 16:26 |
| gibi | ? | 16:26 |
| gibi | sean-k-mooney: I think it would be an additional slot | 16:26 |
| sean-k-mooney | gibi: am if iwas in an NA/Aisa frindly slot i would be more likely to join :) so i doubt i will be tere unless i did not sleep well | 16:27 |
| stephenfin | Too early for me, I'm afraid. I'm rarely concious at that point. I could show up if explicitly requested but that would be about it | 16:27 |
| stephenfin | oh, wait - that's 9am during the summer | 16:27 |
| stephenfin | I'd be around for that (during the summer) | 16:28 |
| sean-k-mooney | well for the rest of this year | 16:28 |
| sean-k-mooney | we are ment to nolonger have daylight saving across europe next year right | 16:28 |
| stephenfin | I wouldn't count on it | 16:28 |
| gmann | oh is it? | 16:28 |
| stephenfin | gibi: If it was 9:00 UTC I could reliably be there, fwiw | 16:29 |
| *** lyarwood has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:29 | |
| stephenfin | but 08:00 UTC would work until October or whenever the clocks change | 16:29 |
| stephenfin | lyarwood has a kid and would gladly be there at 06:00 UTC, I'm sure :P | 16:29 |
| gibi | :P | 16:29 |
| gibi | bauzas: any view from you? | 16:30 |
| bauzas | haven't we said last week that we could have some kind of open session ? | 16:30 |
| *** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:30 | |
| gibi | bauzas: we might not repeate the todays agenda, but have just is-there-any-topic-for-today agenda point | 16:31 |
| bauzas | http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-05-20-16.00.log.html#l-120 | 16:31 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: were you thinking of just doing it in the nova channel rahter then a dedicated meeting room? | 16:31 |
| gibi | can I use \#startmeeting in nova? | 16:32 |
| sean-k-mooney | i think so | 16:32 |
| gmann | yes, | 16:32 |
| dansmith | I think you can | 16:32 |
| *** mlavalle has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
| gmann | we do for QA | 16:32 |
| gibi | coo | 16:32 |
| gibi | l | 16:32 |
| sean-k-mooney | i have seen other channels do it | 16:32 |
| dansmith | tc meetings happen in -tc | 16:32 |
| gmann | yeah tc too | 16:32 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yup | 16:32 |
| gibi | bauzas: 9:00 UTC is better for you too? | 16:32 |
| bauzas | like TC does https://governance.openstack.org/tc/#meeting-office-hour | 16:32 |
| sean-k-mooney | that would be 17:00 in china | 16:33 |
| bauzas | gibi: well, I'd need to go to a school around 9.20UTC every week in the summer time | 16:33 |
| sean-k-mooney | so end of day but not late | 16:33 |
| bauzas | but I don't want to not accept it because of me | 16:33 |
| bauzas | hence the office hour | 16:34 |
| artom | You don't not want to refuse to not decline it? | 16:34 |
| gibi | OK, so you could be with us for the first 15 minutes? | 16:34 |
| bauzas | gibi: yup, I can | 16:34 |
| gibi | cool | 16:34 |
| bauzas | artom: indeed | 16:34 |
| gibi | then lets try 9:00 UTC once a month, on #openstack-nova with an office hour style | 16:35 |
| stephenfin | (y) | 16:35 |
| bauzas | which day ? | 16:35 |
| bauzas | Tuesdays ? | 16:35 |
| gibi | Tueday does not work for me | 16:35 |
| gibi | Thursday would be better | 16:35 |
| bauzas | and what about Mondays ? | 16:36 |
| sean-k-mooney | maybe jsut do another poll | 16:36 |
| gibi | bauzas: Monday works | 16:36 |
| bauzas | I'd prefer to have this kind of office hour be close to a nova meeting | 16:36 |
| sean-k-mooney | 9am on a monday you masochist :P | 16:36 |
| *** jlibosva has quit IRC | 16:36 | |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: ah, right | 16:36 |
| stephenfin | a poll would probably be best | 16:36 |
| gibi | 9:00 UTC is 11:OO CEST ;) | 16:37 |
| sean-k-mooney | ill be asleep most likely so dont work around me | 16:37 |
| bauzas | people need to move to France, I guess | 16:37 |
| bauzas | actually, I'll propose this | 16:37 |
| stephenfin | since we won't capture everyone here | 16:37 |
| gibi | OK, I will set up a poll | 16:37 |
| stephenfin | (also, I've a meeting a 9:15 Mondays already so that wouldn't work) | 16:37 |
| bauzas | (joking, just in case people think about it :p ) | 16:37 |
| gibi | moving on as we have another topic | 16:37 |
| bauzas | another meeting, yay \o/ | 16:37 |
| gibi | (gmann) Nova feedback on Freenode situation | 16:38 |
| gibi | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022675.html | 16:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | the only thing ill say is if you want to avoid bank holidays mid week is best and not the first week in the month | 16:38 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: that depends on the country ;) | 16:38 |
| gmann | on Freenode discussion, this is etherpad to provide nova option #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/feedback-on-freenode | 16:38 |
| bauzas | I've seen this etherpad :( | 16:39 |
| dansmith | to be clear, some projects want to leave freenode right now, without letting the current situation settle or have our infra in place on another network | 16:39 |
| gmann | this is to get feedback from project for TC to decide the next step | 16:39 |
| dansmith | I'm hoping nova will vote to just "wait and see" for the moment | 16:39 |
| bauzas | looks like someone advocated | 16:39 |
| bauzas | dansmith: +1000 for me | 16:39 |
| gmann | I too vote for "wait and see" | 16:39 |
| bauzas | we can vote | 16:39 |
| bauzas | #startvote there it goes :p | 16:40 |
| openstack | Only the meeting chair may start a vote. | 16:40 |
| gibi | #help startvote | 16:40 |
| sean-k-mooney | well its more come to a concenus | 16:40 |
| dansmith | do we need a formal vote? | 16:40 |
| gibi | I don't think so | 16:40 |
| bauzas | nah, was kidding | 16:40 |
| dansmith | if we do, then fine, but if nobody objects to wait-and-see ... | 16:40 |
| gibi | I have no hard opinion. freenode still works for me | 16:40 |
| gmann | yeah, not needed as such | 16:40 |
| dansmith | cool | 16:40 |
| bauzas | do people have other concerns ? | 16:41 |
| gibi | please object loudly if you want to move now | 16:41 |
| bauzas | yup | 16:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | i think if the majroity start moving we shoudl | 16:41 |
| bauzas | who ? | 16:41 |
| gibi | as far as I understand infra is preparing for the move even if we chose to wait | 16:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | to not split thing but im already conented to both upstream and downstream irc networks | 16:41 |
| bauzas | I only saw *some* folks wanting to move | 16:41 |
| sean-k-mooney | so havign a third is not realy a big deal to me | 16:41 |
| bauzas | but I'm not sure we have consensus on moving | 16:41 |
| dansmith | sean-k-mooney: I think we should only move if the TC and infra people decide to move en masse | 16:41 |
| gibi | ++ | 16:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | dansmith: that would be my preference also | 16:42 |
| bauzas | totally agreed | 16:42 |
| stephenfin | yeah, my only concern is that if other (significant) projects did start moving, I'd like to go with | 16:42 |
| dansmith | the question at the moment is which projects are going to leave without waiting or coordinating | 16:42 |
| stephenfin | otherwise, I don't care | 16:42 |
| bauzas | looks the ship sailed for some of them | 16:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | tehre have been stament made by some that they will stop using irc for contibutig if we do not move by the end of the week | 16:42 |
| sean-k-mooney | i will miss them but im not inclidned to move as a result of such statements | 16:42 |
| bauzas | well | 16:42 |
| stephenfin | not the best way to get people on-board, that :) | 16:43 |
| bauzas | I understand why people would want to move, but they also need to think about other contributors | 16:43 |
| bauzas | and at least we would need to continue using Freenode for a lot of time | 16:43 |
| dansmith | stephenfin: or even.. the right way to ensure they're *not* on board :) | 16:43 |
| gibi | it seem ironic and kolla would like to move | 16:43 |
| gibi | move now | 16:43 |
| stephenfin | touché | 16:43 |
| bauzas | just in case some contributors don't see emails | 16:43 |
| sean-k-mooney | what i might suggest is we start keeping the oftc nova channle open for now but keep freenode as our main channel until it plays out in the TC | 16:44 |
| stephenfin | gibi: I assume you need to give a vote on behalf of everyone? | 16:44 |
| stephenfin | as PTL | 16:44 |
| gibi | yes | 16:44 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: please, no | 16:44 |
| gibi | based on the above discussion it is Option 1 for nova. | 16:44 |
| dansmith | sean-k-mooney: I think we should avoid that.. infra is holding the channel | 16:44 |
| gibi | and I will add that to the etherpad | 16:44 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: we need one single channel and we need to redirect folks to the official channel | 16:44 |
| dansmith | gibi: thanks! | 16:44 |
| stephenfin | wfm | 16:44 |
| gmann | sean-k-mooney: yeah that create confusion | 16:45 |
| sean-k-mooney | dansmith: ok | 16:45 |
| gmann | gibi: +1 | 16:45 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: well i was suggstign redirecting them to freenode for now | 16:45 |
| gmann | thanks. gibi can you please add it to etherpad too. | 16:45 |
| gibi | gmann: I will | 16:45 |
| gmann | ah you mentioend that | 16:45 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I don't see the need | 16:45 |
| gmann | thanks | 16:45 |
| bauzas | sean-k-mooney: nothing changes | 16:45 |
| sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i guess empty channel speaks for its self | 16:45 |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:46 | |
| bauzas | but then, two people could discuss | 16:46 |
| bauzas | and that's how you split a community | 16:46 |
| sean-k-mooney | dansmith: do you know if infra has set the topic on those chanels to somehthin glike project X currenlty uses freenode | 16:46 |
| dansmith | sean-k-mooney: no, but they're working on making their bots even work over there, so that would be a good first thing when they're ready | 16:46 |
| sean-k-mooney | ok cool | 16:47 |
| dansmith | I don't think they even have a way to delegate ops because their bots need to be modified to work with OTFC's nickserv, etc as I understand it | 16:47 |
| gibi | is there anything else for today/ | 16:48 |
| gibi | ? | 16:48 |
| gmann | nothing from me. | 16:48 |
| sean-k-mooney | not form me | 16:49 |
| gibi | then thanks for joining | 16:49 |
| gibi | \o | 16:49 |
| gibi | #endmeeting | 16:49 |
| stephenfin | ta | 16:49 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 16:49 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue May 25 16:49:27 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:49 |
| sean-k-mooney | o/ | 16:49 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-05-25-16.00.html | 16:49 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-05-25-16.00.txt | 16:49 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-05-25-16.00.log.html | 16:49 |
| *** sean-k-mooney has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 16:49 | |
| elod | o/ | 16:49 |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
| *** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 17:02 | |
| *** jlibosva has quit IRC | 17:06 | |
| *** psahoo has quit IRC | 17:59 | |
| *** stephenfin has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:03 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
| *** freerunner has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** bnemec has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** mjturek has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** mdbooth has quit IRC | 18:30 | |
| *** freerunner has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:30 | |
| *** mdbooth has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:31 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:31 | |
| *** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 18:31 | |
| *** lajoskatona has left #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:13 | |
| *** lajoskatona has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:14 | |
| *** lajoskatona has quit IRC | 19:21 | |
| *** halali_ has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
| *** halali_ has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 19:44 | |
| *** halali_ has quit IRC | 19:50 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 20:43 | |
| *** elod has quit IRC | 21:16 | |
| *** elod has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 21:18 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-3 | 22:45 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 23:58 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!