Thursday, 2015-12-10

*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-400:02
*** kebray has quit IRC00:02
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-400:02
*** kebray has quit IRC00:04
*** markvoelker has quit IRC00:05
*** bobh has quit IRC00:15
*** klamath has quit IRC00:18
*** pmesserli has quit IRC00:20
*** Prithiv has joined #openstack-meeting-400:37
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2400:48
*** dshakhray has quit IRC01:02
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-401:05
*** markvoelker has quit IRC01:11
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-401:12
*** limao has joined #openstack-meeting-401:15
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa01:16
*** ajmiller_ has quit IRC01:22
*** Prithiv has quit IRC01:26
*** Swami has quit IRC01:35
*** u_kozat has quit IRC01:36
*** bharathm has quit IRC01:36
*** armax has quit IRC01:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-401:43
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:49
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-401:54
*** dolphm has quit IRC01:54
*** nikhil_k has joined #openstack-meeting-401:54
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:54
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC01:54
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting-401:54
*** nikhil has quit IRC01:56
*** kexiaodong has joined #openstack-meeting-401:56
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-401:57
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-402:07
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:10
*** davidlenwell has quit IRC02:10
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting-402:13
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC02:41
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-402:43
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC02:53
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-402:54
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:55
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-403:07
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-403:10
*** markvoelker has quit IRC03:12
*** woodard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-403:22
*** woodard has quit IRC03:25
*** prashantD has quit IRC03:32
*** baohua has joined #openstack-meeting-403:37
*** baoli has quit IRC03:39
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-403:44
*** irenab has quit IRC03:52
*** irenab_ has joined #openstack-meeting-403:52
*** gjayavel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-404:02
*** davidlenwell has quit IRC04:06
*** gjayavel_ has quit IRC04:07
*** davidlenwell has joined #openstack-meeting-404:09
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-404:10
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-404:14
*** dshakhray has joined #openstack-meeting-404:25
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:25
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:33
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-404:39
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:41
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-404:46
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-404:48
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-405:07
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-405:11
*** markvoelker has quit IRC05:12
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC05:20
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-405:30
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-405:38
*** dshakhray has quit IRC05:47
*** red_trela is now known as red|05:51
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-405:52
*** limao has quit IRC05:52
*** neelashah has quit IRC05:55
*** gjayavel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-405:57
*** javeriak has joined #openstack-meeting-406:03
*** javeriak has quit IRC06:04
*** javeriak has joined #openstack-meeting-406:04
*** javeriak has quit IRC06:05
*** iyamahat has quit IRC06:06
*** javeriak has joined #openstack-meeting-406:06
*** javeriak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-406:11
*** javeriak has quit IRC06:12
*** gjayavel_ has quit IRC06:19
*** woodard_ has quit IRC06:22
*** banix has quit IRC06:26
*** nkrinner has joined #openstack-meeting-406:34
*** grakiss has joined #openstack-meeting-406:37
*** xuhan has joined #openstack-meeting-406:39
*** red| is now known as red|trela06:42
*** baohua has quit IRC06:53
*** armax has quit IRC06:57
*** EvgenyF has joined #openstack-meeting-406:59
*** [1]evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting-406:59
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-407:07
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-407:08
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:13
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting-407:16
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-407:23
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-407:26
*** woodard has quit IRC07:27
*** vtech has quit IRC07:35
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC07:36
*** javeriak_ has quit IRC07:42
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC07:47
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting-407:49
*** wshao has joined #openstack-meeting-407:52
*** javeriak has joined #openstack-meeting-407:56
*** wshao has quit IRC07:57
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC07:58
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-407:58
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-408:07
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-408:07
*** vtech has quit IRC08:11
*** yamahata has quit IRC08:14
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC08:14
*** seanmurphy has joined #openstack-meeting-408:18
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC08:21
*** mbound_ has joined #openstack-meeting-408:23
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-408:24
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-408:25
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-408:27
*** woodard has quit IRC08:28
*** paul-carlton2 has joined #openstack-meeting-408:31
*** gjayavel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-408:31
*** gjayavel_ has quit IRC08:35
*** numans has quit IRC08:37
*** javeriak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-408:42
*** kproskurin has joined #openstack-meeting-408:43
*** javeriak has quit IRC08:46
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-408:48
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC08:52
*** paul-carlton2 has quit IRC08:59
*** May-meimei has quit IRC09:01
*** Kevin_Zheng has joined #openstack-meeting-409:02
*** May-meimei has joined #openstack-meeting-409:05
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-409:09
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:14
*** tfukushima has quit IRC09:14
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-409:18
*** red|trela has left #openstack-meeting-409:21
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-409:25
*** hogepodge has quit IRC09:26
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-409:27
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-409:28
*** woodard has quit IRC09:29
*** red_trela has joined #openstack-meeting-409:34
*** red_trela has left #openstack-meeting-409:34
*** _degorenko|afk is now known as degorenko09:43
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-409:44
*** Prithiv has joined #openstack-meeting-409:48
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting-409:49
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-409:53
*** tfukushima has quit IRC09:54
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-409:55
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC09:58
*** igordcard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-409:58
*** igordcard has quit IRC09:58
*** tfukushima has quit IRC09:58
*** wojdev has quit IRC09:59
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC09:59
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting-409:59
*** aglarendil has quit IRC10:00
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-410:00
*** ashtokolov has quit IRC10:01
*** briancurtin has quit IRC10:01
*** ashtokolov has joined #openstack-meeting-410:01
*** aglarendil has joined #openstack-meeting-410:02
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-410:02
*** briancurtin has joined #openstack-meeting-410:03
*** javeriak_ has quit IRC10:04
*** igordcard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-410:04
*** igordcard has quit IRC10:07
*** javeriak has joined #openstack-meeting-410:09
*** javeriak has quit IRC10:13
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-410:25
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-410:25
*** javeriak has joined #openstack-meeting-410:26
*** rbak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-410:26
*** sambetts-afk is now known as sambetts10:27
*** rbak has quit IRC10:28
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:29
*** woodard has quit IRC10:30
*** [1]evgenyf has quit IRC10:49
*** EvgenyF has quit IRC10:49
*** igordcar1_ has joined #openstack-meeting-410:50
*** igordcar1_ has quit IRC10:50
*** igordcar1_ has joined #openstack-meeting-410:50
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC10:50
*** igordcar1_ has quit IRC10:50
*** dims_ has quit IRC11:04
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-411:12
*** tfukushima has quit IRC11:13
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:15
*** igordcard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-411:20
*** iyamahat has quit IRC11:21
*** Claudio1 has joined #openstack-meeting-411:21
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-411:26
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-411:27
*** woodard has quit IRC11:32
*** wojdev has quit IRC11:44
*** xuhan has quit IRC11:52
*** javeriak has quit IRC11:52
*** tfukushima has quit IRC11:55
*** Claudio1 has quit IRC11:55
*** javeriak has joined #openstack-meeting-411:57
*** qwebirc94090 has joined #openstack-meeting-412:00
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC12:01
*** qwebirc94090 has quit IRC12:01
*** Claudio1 has joined #openstack-meeting-412:04
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-412:10
*** tfukushima has quit IRC12:11
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-412:12
*** tfukushima has quit IRC12:12
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-412:12
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC12:22
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-412:26
*** Claudio1 has quit IRC12:27
*** pbourke has quit IRC12:30
*** markvoelker has quit IRC12:30
*** sambetts has quit IRC12:40
*** EvgenyF has joined #openstack-meeting-412:40
*** [1]evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting-412:40
*** pbourke has joined #openstack-meeting-412:41
*** sambetts has joined #openstack-meeting-412:42
*** mbound_ has quit IRC12:45
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-412:45
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-412:47
*** baoli has quit IRC12:50
*** 7F1AA6H41 has joined #openstack-meeting-412:52
*** notmyname has quit IRC12:57
*** rosmaita has quit IRC12:57
*** crinkle has quit IRC12:57
*** rosmaita has joined #openstack-meeting-412:57
*** notmyname has joined #openstack-meeting-412:57
*** crinkle has joined #openstack-meeting-412:58
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-412:59
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-413:01
*** Steap has joined #openstack-meeting-413:04
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:05
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-413:08
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC13:14
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-413:15
*** klamath has joined #openstack-meeting-413:15
*** markmcclain has quit IRC13:23
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-413:34
*** wojdev has quit IRC13:41
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-413:41
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-413:43
*** woodard has quit IRC13:44
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-413:44
*** dims has quit IRC13:48
*** ninag has joined #openstack-meeting-413:50
*** zhiyan has quit IRC13:51
*** javeriak has quit IRC13:52
*** zhiyan has joined #openstack-meeting-413:53
*** abhishekk has joined #openstack-meeting-413:54
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-413:57
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC13:57
*** Guest71177 has quit IRC13:57
*** gjayavel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-413:58
*** sc68cal has quit IRC13:58
*** bpoulos has joined #openstack-meeting-413:58
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2413:59
flaper87Courtesy meeting reminder: ativelkov, cpallares, flaper87, flwang1, hemanthm, jokke_, kragniz, lakshmiS, mclaren, mfedosin, nikhil_k14:00
*** lemondream has joined #openstack-meeting-414:00
flaper87Courtesy meeting reminder: Nikolay_St, Olena, pennerc, rosmaita, sigmavirus24, sabari, TravT, ajayaa, GB21, bpoulos, harshs, abhishekk, bunting14:00
flaper87Courtesy meeting reminder: dshakhray, wxy, dhellmann, kairat14:00
*** lemondream is now known as avarner_14:00
sigmavirus24o/14:00
flaper87#startmeeting Glance14:00
flaper87#topic Agenda14:00
flaper87#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda14:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 14:00:33 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is flaper87. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
kragnizo/14:00
flaper87Not a very long agenda, yet. HOW'S EVERYONE DOING? :D :D :D14:00
avarner_o/14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:00
nikhil_ko/14:00
abhishekk0/14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'glance'14:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Agenda (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:00
jokke_o/14:00
*** nikhil_k is now known as nikhil14:00
*** scott_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:00
*** scott_ is now known as Guest3075314:00
*** 7F1AA6H41 has quit IRC14:00
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting-414:01
*** sc68cal has quit IRC14:01
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting-414:01
sigmavirus24flaper87: still sick, but y'know :P14:01
ativelkovo/14:01
flaper87let's give some more minutes for folks to join14:01
flaper87sigmavirus24: :( get well soon!14:01
flaper87btw, happy to have you back :D14:01
sigmavirus24I'm happy to be back14:01
kragnizsigmavirus24: welcome back!14:02
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-414:02
flaper87ok, let's  get started. I still have a crappy internet connection so, expect some lag from me :D14:02
flaper87tihs time is not my brain's fault14:02
sigmavirus24flaper87: sure ;)14:02
*** gjayavel_ has quit IRC14:02
flaper87:P14:02
flaper87#topic Teams Updates14:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Teams Updates (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:03
flaper87artifacts nikhil ativelkov14:03
*** julim has quit IRC14:03
rosmaitao/14:03
nikhilHi14:03
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-414:03
ativelkovso, we have two specs on review now14:03
ativelkovone is for glance v3 -> glare v0.114:03
flaper87ativelkov: I put the v3 -> 0.1 in the specs prio list14:04
ativelkovanother one is a public API description, i.e. the one which addresses the defcore and API-wg concerns14:04
ativelkovflaper87: I saw that, thanks!14:04
flaper87awesome, I think I commented on the other one but was just a quick comment. We'll need API-WG feedback on that one but yeah, lets get it reviewed14:04
ativelkovActually, that one was written by mfedosin, but he is on PTO, so I may answer any questions on that14:04
jokke_ativelkov: do you have idea about timeline? When would you need the review powar on majority parts of this work?14:04
ativelkovjokke_: the migration patch is already submitted. it's still WiP, but I expect it to complete today or tomorrow14:05
flaper87#chair nikhil14:05
openstackCurrent chairs: flaper87 nikhil14:05
jokke_oh it's on that good shape ... cool14:05
rosmaitaativelkov: i left come comments on your spec last night14:05
flaper87nikhil: in case disappear :D14:06
ativelkov#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255274/14:06
nikhilflaper87: ah ok, sure14:06
ativelkovrosmaita: thanks! Didn't check it yet, will have some cycles for that later today14:06
*** kairat has joined #openstack-meeting-414:06
flaper87from a review pov, right now the focus should be on the migration spec and patches implementing that spec14:06
kairato/14:06
flaper87not saying we shouldn't review the other one14:07
ativelkovI just want to quickly sync some major decision points on that migration14:07
rosmaitaativelkov: nothing major, just some clarifications14:07
flaper87shooot14:07
ativelkovwhat should be the default glare port? I suggest 8383, but open for other proposals14:07
flaper87939314:07
flaper87I guess that's what you meant14:07
ativelkovoh, yeah, 9393, sure14:07
*** julim has quit IRC14:08
nikhil+114:08
ativelkovAnd what should be the keystone service name and type? I propose type='artifact' and name='glare', but feel free to suggest something else14:08
jokke_9393 would be my preference as well14:08
flaper87I think jokke_ checked it and it was free14:08
flaper87or was it mfedosin14:08
sabario/14:08
jokke_it was at least during summit still14:08
sigmavirus24why not 9293 or 9392 just to be funny?14:08
nikhilsorry to bring this up late but do everyone feel ok with name "glare"?14:08
jokke_sigmavirus24: because this is serious business and we're not funny here ;)14:09
sigmavirus24ooo why not randomly bind to one of those two?14:09
* sigmavirus24 shouldnt' be allowed in meetings14:09
flaper87I do feel ok with glare14:09
sigmavirus24nikhil: I'm meh14:09
rosmaitanikhil: i am +1 on Glare14:09
nikhilI think as a part of initial phase it seems ok but when you bring up keystone name it sounds a bit weird14:09
jokke_I liked it14:09
sigmavirus24I don't want glance glaring at everyone but whatever14:09
nikhilI would prefer the name "Art"14:09
sigmavirus24nikhil: Arti14:09
flaper87ativelkov: re service catalog, I think that's fine but please sync with sdague or some keystone folks on that14:09
nikhilprolly should send that to ML14:09
nikhilsigmavirus24: yeah, that's safer14:10
nikhil:_14:10
nikhil:)14:10
sigmavirus24nikhil: makes Artifacts sound like your neighbor who is super friend "Hey Arti!"14:10
flaper87lol14:10
ativelkovyeah, nikhil, thanks, ML is a good idea14:10
* sigmavirus24 still wonders why flaper87 invited him back to the core team :P14:10
flaper87ok, let's move on14:10
jokke_sigmavirus24: but they are!14:10
sigmavirus24jokke_: I know!14:10
flaper87sigmavirus24: I'm already regrettningit14:10
flaper87:P14:10
nikhilsigmavirus24: haha, arti in hindi means workship14:10
jokke_flaper87: we still have time to block that?14:10
sigmavirus24nikhil: all the better :)14:11
nikhil:)14:11
sigmavirus24jokke_: you already +1'd it :P14:11
flaper87ok ok, let's move on14:11
jokke_sigmavirus24: I know, but I have friends (believe or not) :P14:11
flaper87what else on artifacts?14:11
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-414:11
flaper87jokke_: sigmavirus24 friendly notice: shut up!14:11
flaper87:P14:11
ativelkovwell, nothing new for now14:11
nikhilflaper87: there are tiny things to be aware of14:12
nikhillogged here:14:12
flaper87nikhil: shoot14:12
nikhil#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance_artifacts_sub_team/2015/glance_artifacts_sub_team.2015-12-07-14.04.html14:12
nikhildone14:12
flaper87okidoki, I'll read through14:12
flaper87thanks for the heads up14:12
nikhilnp14:12
flaper87Drivers updates:14:12
flaper87Let me start with saying that I've added the reviews priorities for specs to the drivers meetting's agenda. To all drivers and people interested in providing feedback, please, take a look here:14:12
flaper87#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-drivers-meeting-agenda14:13
flaper87Also, if you think your spec should be a priority, let me (or any of the drivers) know and we'll evaluate the urgency based on the current load.14:13
flaper87Image Import process broken down into sub-tasks (flaper87)14:13
flaper87#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232371/14:13
flaper87There have been more comments and updates on the spec. If you haven't followed-up on it, this would be a good time to re-read it as I believe we're getting closer to an almost-ready status.14:13
flaper87In addition to this, we've broken the spec down into several work items and we'll keep expanding the list as new items/parts are agreed on. This is fairly new and it happened yday, I believe. If you're looking forward to contribute to this work, I'd highly recommend you to go through this list, provide some feedback on the work items and take them :)14:13
flaper87Note that there are some dependencies in this work items so please, respect that.14:13
flaper87To all reviewers, whenever you're reviewing patches for this work, make sure you have the spec openned right next to the patch you're reviewing :D14:13
flaper87questions? concerns? feedback?14:13
jokke_can we agree that bikeshed is called bikeshed?14:14
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-414:14
rosmaitajokke_: it's now called "stage"14:14
flaper87jokke_: no, that actually changed in PS814:14
flaper87:D14:14
rosmaitabut we can change it back14:14
jokke_++14:15
flaper87rosmaita: sshhh14:15
rosmaitaif there's popular demand14:15
rosmaitasorry14:15
flaper87don't you know sigmavirus24 is back ?14:15
flaper87don't get him started14:15
nikhilstage sounds good to me14:15
rosmaitasigmavirus24 wants to call it the "yak pen"14:15
nikhilbut not sure if it's a noun or verb14:15
flaper87lol14:15
rosmaitanikhil: exactly!14:15
rosmaitait's both14:15
nikhil:)14:15
* sigmavirus24 is being quiet14:15
nikhilthought so14:15
flaper87BAM! mindblown14:15
jokke_then we can call the working dir in the worker code "backstage" ... sounds good to me :)14:15
flaper87jokke_: LOOOOOOL, love that14:16
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-414:16
nikhilgreen room?14:16
flaper87hahahahhaha14:16
sigmavirus24are tasks stage hands now?14:16
flaper87ok ok, let's move on14:16
flaper87Cross project updates14:16
flaper87nikhil: floor is yours14:16
nikhilSo, that one got feedback14:16
flaper87so many updates, this is good14:16
nikhiland there are two things14:16
nikhilit's hard to get the lib on list of exceptions14:16
nikhillib == glance_store14:16
nikhilas things are we will see when we hit a situation14:17
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC14:17
nikhilas the process is sorta complexly variable14:17
nikhilbut overall I like the idea of governance tag14:17
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:17
nikhiland about to add +1 to that idea14:17
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-414:17
nikhiloverall the spec ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226157 ) is in good shape14:18
flaper87mmhh, but that's not a tag, though. it's a x-proj spec. The tag exists already and it's called assert:follows-standard-deprecation14:18
* nikhil done. was thinking wrongly, spec was linked. 14:18
flaper87unless they are talking about a new tag and I missed that part14:18
flaper87nikhil: thanks for the updated14:18
jokke_no I think flaper87 you are correct14:19
nikhilI don't know which tag they are talking about14:19
nikhilit's a comment from doug14:19
flaper87ah, I probably missed that comment14:19
jokke_I think that plan will be reverted next cycle again (branchless clients and libs) because all the hell will break loose but lets see14:19
flaper87I'll read through14:19
flaper87ok, let's move on14:19
flaper87#topic New home for release schedule (flaper87)14:20
*** openstack changes topic to "New home for release schedule (flaper87) (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:20
flaper87Just a heads up that the release schedule home has changed. It's not longer in the wiki page but in the openstack docs url. Here's the link:14:20
flaper87#link http://docs.openstack.org/releases/schedules/mitaka.html14:20
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-414:20
flaper87I'll be updating that schedule to add Glance's timelines and schedule activities.14:20
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-414:20
flaper87questions? feedback? Just wanted to make  sure you were aware of this14:20
* flaper87 wants a per-project .ics with scheduled activities just like we have fro meetings14:21
* flaper87 will propose that14:21
jokke_++14:21
flaper87ok, moving on14:21
jokke_that would be super handy14:21
flaper87#topic glance_store's drivers deprecation (flaper87)14:21
*** openstack changes topic to "glance_store's drivers deprecation (flaper87) (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:21
flaper87#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-December/081966.html14:21
flaper87I sent that email out a couple of minutes ago. I don't expect folks to have read it already but I'd like to encourage everyone to do so. Feedback would be awesome as that's going to make some people sad/mad and it'd be great to have the community on the same page so that we can provide the best feedback to consumers of the library and, of course, stand behind on the decisions made.14:21
nikhilI noticed swift wasn't in the list of glance-maint14:22
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:22
flaper87nikhil: I knew you would be one of them :D14:22
nikhiland I just found out the explanation14:23
jokke_;)14:23
flaper87hope the reasoning makes sense but I'm happy to discuss that further14:23
kragnizso the plan is to run all glance functional tests against master glance_store?14:23
kragniz(I think that's a good idea)14:23
flaper87yeah14:23
nikhilmaster & stable!?14:23
flaper87pretty much the same way cinder does w/ third-party drivers14:23
flaper87nikhil: yup14:23
kragnizflaper87: sounds good14:23
*** vikram_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:24
flaper87happy to discuss this now if folks have read the email already or we can add it back to next week's meeting due to the short notice14:24
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-414:24
flaper87or both14:24
flaper87:P14:24
nikhilnext meeting sounds good to me to be able to ponder on things14:25
flaper87++14:25
flaper87ok, I'll add it there14:25
rosmaitawow, that's some email!14:25
kragnizI'm good with the rest of it14:25
nikhilyeah, I thought so too14:25
*** [1]evgenyf has quit IRC14:25
kragnizwhat happens if we don't get people to volunteer?14:25
flaper87okidoki, let's move on :D14:26
flaper87kragniz: the email says, we'll remove that driver14:26
sabarime too, looks good and wasn't a surprise since we have been talking about 3rd party CI for sometime14:26
*** EvgenyF has quit IRC14:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:26
nikhilkragniz: we will! or the drivers go in a cycle or two :)14:26
ativelkovI'll try asking Mirantis's ceph team if they want to volunteer maintaining the ceph driver14:26
kragnizcool, in O14:26
flaper87ativelkov: sounds awesome!14:26
nikhilkragniz: passive reach out to get more open source upstream friendly14:26
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-414:26
nikhilmore people*14:27
flaper87ok, let's move one14:27
flaper87#topic Release notes14:27
*** openstack changes topic to "Release notes (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:27
flaper87jokke_: was that you?14:27
jokke_yeah14:27
flaper87floor is yours14:27
jokke_so quick heads up for people. We moved to utilize reno for release notes14:27
flaper87w0000000h00000014:28
jokke_#link http://docs.openstack.org/developer/reno/14:28
kragnizall our projects have now moved, correct?14:28
kragniz(store + client)14:28
jokke_tons of small files ahead so please look into the documentation and prepare yourselves that Liberty and Mitaka+ will require those14:28
flaper87I think yes, glance_store was the last one to join14:28
kragnizcool14:28
jokke_so lets start including those release notes into the changes, please14:29
nikhilso searchlight team added some good guidelines for when and how to add notes14:29
nikhil#link https://github.com/openstack/searchlight/blob/master/doc/source/feature-requests-bugs.rst#release-notes14:29
flaper87jokke_:anything reviewers should keep in mind ?14:29
flaper87nikhil: ++ thanks14:29
flaper87we should probably have that as well14:29
flaper87in the contirbuting docs14:29
*** rbak_ has quit IRC14:30
nikhilbesides there's this:14:30
nikhil#link http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#how-to-add-new-release-notes14:30
kragnizshouldn't these be somewhere common and link to that?14:30
flaper87contributing*14:30
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-414:30
jokke_flaper87: nothing special comes up to my mind atm. good idea ofc check the output of the rel notes job to verify that they actyally get included14:30
nikhilkragniz: that was project specific14:30
nikhilopenstack specific is the link above14:30
flaper87awesome stuff! glad to see the rel-notes process improved14:31
jokke_other than that lets get that going so we can later on agree requiring those and providing - votes for not including them14:31
flaper87++14:31
kragnizone thing to remember is who these notes are for: end users and deployers14:31
flaper87sounds good to me! Any questions? objections?14:32
jokke_that's it from me14:32
flaper87kragniz: ++14:32
nikhilmore descriptive the better (explicit vs implicit)14:32
kragnizextra noise in release notes makes things harder for them to pick out important things14:32
jokke_kragniz: specially service & client14:32
nikhilyeah, but good meta-info clears that confusion too!14:32
jokke_store is bit there and there ... they are more for us ;)14:32
kragniz(for example, end users don't care about us refactoring tests)14:33
* flaper87 likes that kragniz always brings that up as a nice reminder14:33
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-414:33
kragnizflaper87: if I say it enough times!14:33
sigmavirus24kragniz: jokke_ we should make a gate check for those release notes14:33
flaper87kragniz: re tests, that's debeatable. Some consumers of these libraries use the tests shipped in the library14:34
sigmavirus24We should automate that kind of stuff instead of relying on reviewers to remember to -1 things14:34
kragnizsigmavirus24: what would it check?14:34
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-414:34
jokke_kragniz: but deployer does care if we refactor the test to validate that it still tests their use-case14:34
sigmavirus24kragniz: that the commit includes release notes?14:34
flaper87but I agree "fixed a typo" is not useful14:34
jokke_sigmavirus24: let's get the people used to that first and then we can see how we gate it fitering those typofixes etc. out14:35
kragnizsigmavirus24: do you mean for all commits?14:35
kragnizflaper87: okay, I guess so14:35
sigmavirus24kragniz: gate checks can be skipped14:35
sigmavirus24It would probably take some tuning but we could certainly do it14:36
flaper87(unless the typo is in a function name)14:36
jokke_as said lets think that _after_ we get the community used to this (and everyone having at least their first rel note merged)14:37
kragnizsigmavirus24: it's an interesting idea14:37
kragnizbut yeah, we should get used to the process first14:37
flaper87anything else on this topic?14:37
kragnizthat's all from me14:37
jokke_ditto14:37
flaper87coolio14:38
flaper87#topic Open Discussion14:38
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:38
flaper87nikhil: ?14:38
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-414:38
nikhilso this one14:38
nikhil#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/24334814:38
flaper87cli stuff, right?14:38
nikhilyes, sorry. the title is:14:39
nikhilDeprecate individual CLIs in favour of OSC14:39
nikhilIt's gaining good traction14:39
nikhillots of +2s14:39
flaper87it'd be great totget people's feedback on that spec14:39
nikhiland I overall like the idea14:39
* flaper87 +2'd it and jokke_ is going to hate him for that14:39
nikhilI have been thinking about one thing though14:39
jokke_thanks nikhil14:39
jokke_flaper87: that's your call ... will -1 it myself ;)14:40
kragnizI'm +1 on that14:40
kragnizit's a pain to use all the different clis14:40
flaper87nikhil: what's that?14:40
nikhilbesides the import stuff14:40
nikhilthe location management stuff14:40
nikhilI find it hard to believe it's out there on the stage with configuration etc at the glance backend14:41
flaper87I don't think anything will happen until N (or  even O) but t's good to keep in mind that's likely going to happen14:41
nikhilthe UX is pretty bad and am not sure if it's interop fussy topic14:41
flaper87nikhil: that's related to OSC, right?14:42
nikhilanyways, it just seems like a bad idea to port that to OSC14:42
nikhilyes14:42
flaper87it'd be great to bring all this feedback to the m-l and the OSC team14:42
jokke_as said before I'm happy to spin off glancecli project forking the last version of cli we ship if we're going to this direction :P14:42
nikhilI have always been of the opinion that location management is for the case where operators trust their users (private cloud)14:43
flaper87nikhil: I'm curious to know how all that will work on OSC14:43
*** wojdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:43
*** wojdev has quit IRC14:43
*** wojdev_ is now known as wojdev14:43
nikhilexactly14:43
sigmavirus24jokke_:  you're welcome to do that :P14:43
nikhilso, I am not sure at this point if we can remove the glanceclient CLI 100%14:43
flaper87cool, do let me know when you have some extra feedback14:43
flaper87erm, some answers for that14:44
flaper87that was a hell of a freaudian slip14:44
*** TravT_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:44
kragniznikhil: I don't think people want to remove it right now14:44
flaper87nikhil: perhaps a new thread on the m-l about this?14:44
flaper87kragniz: I think nikhil meant "entirely and not when that will happen14:44
kragniznikhil: more tell people that the recommended thing is OSC14:44
nikhilok, noting it down14:44
nikhilflaper87: right, that's what I meant14:45
flaper87the spec says it'll stay for 2 more cycles after it's marked as deprecated14:45
kragnizflaper87: okay14:45
* kragniz only skimmed the spec, sorry :(14:45
flaper87ok, one more heads up from me: The spec freeze date is approaching so, spec writeers, please, I beg you ,address comments in a timely manner so we can work with you on getting those merged14:46
flaper87There have been reviews to specs and quite some lag on addressing those feedbacks14:46
jokke_well the spec proposes clearly 2 cycles to remove native clients14:46
flaper87I've mentioned this in the email I sent to the m-l last night14:47
flaper87jokke_: you have 2 cycles to fork the CLI </troll>14:47
flaper87anything else? anyone?14:47
nikhilI want to propose a video conference for artifacts.14:48
flaper87nikhil: to demo it or to talk about the new API ?14:48
nikhilsometime before the holidays (depending on your locality)14:48
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:49
* sigmavirus24 has to cut out early14:49
nikhiland after 16th dec (when Mike is back and settled hopefully)14:49
ativelkovSounds good to me14:49
nikhilflaper87: no, to increase momentum and get early feedback14:49
ativelkovMike will be back on Monday, I think14:49
nikhilanything that we need to talk about it actually14:50
flaper87I'm happy to join and schedule it. WE can use my bluejeans bridge as we did for the import process14:50
nikhilI can propose some agenda and send out etherpad14:50
ativelkovnikhil: I like the idea. Need to try to invite the guys from community app catalog14:50
nikhilativelkov: +114:50
flaper87nikhil: please do, I'll setup the meeting on bluejeans so we can record it and what not14:50
jokke_oh yeah ... FYI I'll be out of picture between Tue 15th and Tue 5th of Jan14:50
nikhilgreat14:50
nikhiloh noes14:51
nikhilflaper87: I will sync offline when I have something ready14:51
jokke_so don't expect reviews, actions, e-mails, replies etc. from me during that time :D14:51
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:51
flaper87jokke_ please, enjoy your holidays. If we see an email, review, rant, joke from you on that period of time, we'll revoke your -2 rights and just leave you with +1 and +214:52
nikhilI hope we have another one later in the cycle when things are more through the gate and jokke_ will be there then14:52
flaper87actually, just +114:52
flaper87and no +214:52
flaper87:P14:52
flaper87+A*14:52
jokke_flaper87: ninja reverts ... you won't even notice them :P14:52
rosmaitajokke_: +1 on enjoying your holidays14:52
*** mmedvede has quit IRC14:53
jokke_flaper87: I promise to stay more within the Holiday scope than you did14:53
jokke_:)14:53
flaper87touche14:53
flaper87damnit, ppl always use that against me14:53
flaper87ok,if there's nothing else, we can call it a meeting14:54
*** mmedvede has joined #openstack-meeting-414:54
flaper87thanks everyone! see y'all next week.14:54
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-414:54
nikhilthanks all!14:54
flaper87#endmeeting14:54
*** openstack changes topic to "Q&A (Meeting topic: openstack-vahana)"14:54
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 14:54:35 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:54
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2015/glance.2015-12-10-14.00.html14:54
rosmaitabye14:54
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2015/glance.2015-12-10-14.00.txt14:54
kragnizthanks all14:54
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2015/glance.2015-12-10-14.00.log.html14:54
*** abhishekk has quit IRC14:54
*** avarner_ has left #openstack-meeting-414:54
*** kairat has left #openstack-meeting-414:56
TravT_#startmeeting openstack search15:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 15:00:42 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is TravT_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_search'15:00
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting-415:00
nikhilo/15:01
*** sjmc7 has joined #openstack-meeting-415:01
rosmaitao/15:01
TravT_o/15:01
sjmc7o/15:01
rosmaitabrb ... have to refill coffee15:01
yingjunhi15:01
nikhilsame here15:01
TravT_good call on coffee15:01
TravT_as FYI, lakshmiS live in an area of India that has been hit hard by flooding and he's had only occassional power the last couple weeks.15:02
rosmaitaback15:02
*** amotoki has quit IRC15:02
TravT_how is everybody this lovely day?15:02
rosmaitasorry to hear about lakshimiS ... hope he & his family are OK15:02
TravT_yeah. i think they are all ok15:03
TravT_agenda is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/search-team-meeting-agenda15:03
TravT_#topic Mitaka m1 tagged15:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Mitaka m1 tagged (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:04
TravT_https://github.com/openstack/searchlight/releases/tag/0.2.0.0b115:04
TravT_not much to say about it15:04
TravT_other than FYI15:04
sjmc7that’s a catchy tag15:05
sjmc7rolls off the tongue!15:05
TravT_the new process on the surface seemed complicated from the email, but actually was easier than last time.15:05
TravT_i think some of the projects that are used to just having release manager do everything may not have agreed15:05
TravT_but for us, it was simpler15:06
TravT_#topic cinder updates15:06
*** openstack changes topic to "cinder updates (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:06
TravT_this one isn't on the agenda, but thought I'd share some info15:06
TravT_duncan (core on cinder team) tells me he's got it nearly ready15:07
yingjunnice15:07
TravT_he's been also working on improving notifications from cinder for searchlight purposes15:07
kragnizawesome!15:08
kragniz(o/ btw)15:08
TravT_o/15:08
TravT_the plugin he's got, he says will work with new notifications and have a fallback to do API callbacks until the notifications are in cinder15:09
TravT_(unless I mistook something)15:09
yingjunso is it possible to get that Mitaka?15:09
TravT_that is definitely the goal15:09
TravT_i know he has a number of things he's juggling, but he says he'll try to have a patch up shortly15:10
sjmc7once lakshmi’s back online i’m hoping to put a swift demo together, although hte notifications are harder in that case15:10
TravT_#topic swift updates15:10
*** openstack changes topic to "swift updates (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:10
TravT_^15:10
sjmc7err, that15:10
sjmc7i’ve been able to consume notifications from swift, but need to find somewhere for the middleware to live15:10
TravT_yeah, once lakshmi has that patch up, we'll be in a better place to talk to the swift team further15:11
*** chaozhechen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:11
TravT_i've been scratching my head of whether or not we should put swift search into that horizon panel or not15:11
TravT_i know there is effort being discussed to redesign the swift panel in horizon.15:12
TravT_and i'd like to get them to consider search as part of that.15:12
TravT_so i'll pursue that.15:12
sjmc7we’ll have to see how the timing works out15:12
TravT_by "that horizon panel" i mean the one I created and showed at the summit15:12
TravT_i've started working a bit on that code again.15:13
TravT_anyway, next topic i believe, unless you have anything else here sjmc7.  I don't see briancline15:13
sjmc7nope, thats it15:14
TravT_#topic searchlight client cli15:14
*** openstack changes topic to "searchlight client cli (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:14
TravT_yingjun has been working on it.15:14
TravT_i owe you a review on the base patch yingjun15:15
TravT_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249076/15:15
TravT_do you need anything more to do more work?  probably some more thoughts on additional commands for it?15:15
sjmc7yeah, that’s going well. i’l ltry to review those patches as well today15:15
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-415:15
yingjuni also uploaded a patch for facet list: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249076/15:16
*** chaozhechen_ has quit IRC15:16
*** chaozhechen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:16
TravT_excellent!15:16
TravT_As FYI, the group the sjmc7 and I work for is having a face to face meeting most of this week, which has been taking up a fair amount of overhead time15:17
TravT_it ends tomorrow, so my plan is to catch up on reviews tomorrow.15:17
TravT_#topic     Add searchlight to requirements/projects.txt15:18
*** openstack changes topic to "Add searchlight to requirements/projects.txt (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:18
yingjunThat would be nice!15:18
TravT_yingjun, this is your topic I believe?15:18
yingjunyes, seems like searchlight is not added in requirements/projects.txt15:19
TravT_that's interesting.  what all is this used for?15:20
yingjunis it missed to adding there or on purpose?15:20
TravT_it wasn't on purpose.15:20
yingjunhttp://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html#add-project-to-the-requirements-list15:21
*** zeih has quit IRC15:21
sjmc7ah, we were wondering about that the other day15:21
sjmc7the requirements checker15:21
TravT_ahh, yes15:22
sjmc7looks like you put up a patch for this, yingjun?15:22
TravT_this would make it so we get the auto proposal bots, right?15:22
sjmc7https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255031/15:22
sjmc7right15:22
yingjunyes15:22
TravT_yingjun: thank you15:22
TravT_there are so many places update that we just missed this one15:23
TravT_I think we do want it15:23
TravT_we don't have to accept the auto-proposal bots, but without them, we'll surely fall behind15:23
sjmc7yep15:23
* david-lyle is late15:24
TravT_p/15:24
TravT_o/15:24
david-lyleo/15:24
TravT_i think we'll need to add the usual suspects as reviewers to that change15:24
TravT_to get any action on it15:24
sjmc7i’ve still not been able to get the e-s requirements cap patch through15:25
TravT_what's the patch #/15:25
TravT_?15:25
sjmc7oo, wait, i think it did merge15:25
TravT_i thought Doug +2'd15:25
TravT_#topic es client version15:25
*** openstack changes topic to "es client version (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:25
yingjunthe requirements patch did merged15:25
sjmc7yeah, looks like davanum approved it early this morning15:25
TravT_oh, then we need to update our requirements15:26
sjmc7or yesterday? that’s what being in meetings all week does :)15:26
TravT_(since we didn't have the autoproposal on)15:26
sjmc7yeah, i can do that15:26
yingjunyeah15:26
TravT_great15:26
david-lylebecause we're no in projects.txt?15:26
sjmc7though i think once it does get turned on it’ll fix everything15:26
david-lyle*not15:26
TravT_david-lyle: yingjun discovered that yesterday15:27
david-lyleinteresting15:27
sjmc7yeah… SOMEONE (me) forgot to add the repo to projects.txt15:27
*** dandruta has joined #openstack-meeting-415:27
TravT_he put up a patch15:27
TravT_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255031/15:27
TravT_let's blame kragniz15:27
TravT_;)15:28
sjmc7:)  once that gets approved we should get caught up on anything that’s changed15:28
sjmc7but i’ll update our local one for the es version15:28
TravT_will we get caught up? or do we need to manually get it up to date?15:28
david-lyleso were our requirements out of sync for Liberty?15:28
david-lylemight need a backport too15:29
TravT_david-lyle: hmm... good point15:29
david-lylewell, I guess it wouldn't be a backport15:29
sjmc7urgh, maybe. i’ll take a look at that too15:29
david-lylebut next thing that changes on stable/liberty/requirements might trigger a larger req proposal15:29
david-lylemight be better to do preemptively and test it out15:30
sjmc7ok. i’ll file a bug and take a look15:30
TravT_thx sjmc7 and thx yingjun for catching that and thx david-lyle for thinking about stable/liberty15:31
TravT_#topic bug review15:31
*** openstack changes topic to "bug review (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:31
TravT_I just added a couple reviews up there related to a bug we opened quite awhile back.15:32
TravT_https://bugs.launchpad.net/searchlight/+bug/149397515:32
openstackLaunchpad bug 1493975 in OpenStack Search (Searchlight) "Need separate config sections for api and listener" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Itisha Dewan (ishadewan07)15:32
TravT_looks like we'll finally get that with the work yingjun is doing.15:33
nikhilreaasign the bug then?15:33
TravT_yeah i think so15:33
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-415:33
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting-415:33
nikhili have little ctx15:34
TravT_so, if anybody can take a look at reviewing them today, would be nice15:34
yingjunso these patches need your reviews: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/253973/, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/253981/, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255650/15:34
yingjun:)15:34
*** banix has quit IRC15:34
nikhilmay be person working can add review to the bug15:34
TravT_yingjun, can you copy paste that into comments on bug?15:34
nikhilyingjun: ah, pls feel free to add to that bug and assign it to yourself15:34
yingjunok, i’ll do that15:35
TravT_the context is basically that searchlight.conf had several options in the [default] group and it wasn't clear if they were used for listener or api15:35
TravT_or both15:35
TravT_so we wanted a [listener] and [api] group to clarify that15:35
nikhilTravT_: np, i was looking for newer reviews and ctx for the latest work15:36
nikhilthanks for the info though15:36
TravT_np15:36
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC15:37
TravT_#topic blueprint review15:37
*** openstack changes topic to "blueprint review (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:37
TravT_FYI that Steve and I think we have come up with a good solution for limiting the ability to search admin fields.15:37
TravT_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245357/15:38
TravT_I think it is good enough to approve at this point and can be updated later if needed15:38
TravT_remember, our specs aren't intended to be 100% detailed design docs15:39
TravT_so if others can look at it, would be appreciated15:39
TravT_sjmc7 and i also spent time yesterday whiteboarding on zero downtime indexing (since he's here this week due to other "overhead" meetings)15:40
TravT_david-lyle: we'll be doing some more today probably if you'd be up for driving across town15:40
TravT_i'll update that spec though.15:41
david-lyleI will likely be down there later in the afternoon15:42
TravT_ok, i'll ping you on irc later15:42
david-lyleTravT_: sure15:42
TravT_we didn't know if we'd get any time to do actual work while he was here, and just lucked out and manage a little yesterday15:43
TravT_next up, there is a spec on notification forwarding to zaqar15:43
TravT_that has quite a bit of dialog15:43
TravT_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/246220/15:43
TravT_i need to read latest15:43
TravT_i think we'll also want flwang (zaqar PTL) to comment again15:44
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-415:44
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-415:45
TravT_#topic open discussion15:45
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:45
TravT_Anything else to talk about?15:45
sjmc7don’t think i had anything else15:45
TravT_thanks kragniz, david-lyle, yingjun, rosmaita, nikhil, sjmc7!15:46
rosmaitareading through the admin search spec now15:47
TravT_rosmaita: ok, cool should we wait around15:47
yingjunno from me15:47
rosmaitaif you have a minute15:47
TravT_sure15:47
*** Prithiv has quit IRC15:47
rosmaitalooks like my questions are being answered at the bottom of the doc, though15:47
TravT_the current proposed change was an alternative brought up in patch set 215:48
TravT_so, the original proposed change is now an alternative15:48
* TravT_ will be quiet and let rosmaita think15:49
rosmaitaty!15:49
rosmaitai remember the prior discussion about the 2 indices (indexes?)15:49
sjmc7yeah - i was persuaded that was a bad idea from a maintenance perspective15:50
*** armax has quit IRC15:50
rosmaitai think the 2 doc solution is pretty clever15:50
sjmc7it’s quite similar this way15:50
rosmaitadef better than trying to modify the queries, i think15:50
sjmc7except that instead of an index seperation it’s a filter applied to queries (or aliases)15:50
TravT_yeah it is based on this:15:51
TravT_https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/indices-aliases.html#filtered15:51
sjmc7i’ve tested a prototype, and it works fine15:52
sjmc7it has the advantage of allowing more than one role, potentially15:52
TravT_to api users of ES, it looks like they are talking to a regular index15:52
sjmc7sorry,more than two roles15:52
*** javeriak has joined #openstack-meeting-415:52
TravT_but really they are talking to an alias in ES that automatically applies a filter15:53
rosmaitasjmc7: i was thinking that, too (about the multiple roles)15:53
rosmaitait's extensible!15:53
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-meeting-415:53
sjmc7yeah.. not that i necessarily forsee that happening, but it’s there. it’s also much easier from an operator perspective15:53
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-415:55
TravT_ok, just a couple minutes left15:57
*** javeriak has quit IRC15:58
*** vikram_ has quit IRC15:58
TravT_rosmaita: i'll be in the room shortly15:58
rosmaitaTravT_: i'm done15:59
TravT_i have to transfer to the office15:59
TravT_ok.15:59
TravT_thanks for looking through it15:59
rosmaitai +2 but didn't +A15:59
sjmc7thanks rosmaita15:59
rosmaitanp, nice spec sjmc715:59
TravT_ok, will give others a bit more to look through15:59
TravT_thanks everybody15:59
rosmaitayeah, just in case, but i think it's a good proposal16:00
TravT_have a good rest of your day / night16:00
TravT_#endmeeting16:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Q&A (Meeting topic: openstack-vahana)"16:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 16:00:26 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_search/2015/openstack_search.2015-12-10-15.00.html16:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_search/2015/openstack_search.2015-12-10-15.00.txt16:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_search/2015/openstack_search.2015-12-10-15.00.log.html16:00
*** sjmc7 has left #openstack-meeting-416:00
*** yingjun has left #openstack-meeting-416:00
*** KLevenstein has joined #openstack-meeting-416:00
*** Sam-I-Am has joined #openstack-meeting-416:01
*** jreeves has joined #openstack-meeting-416:01
*** javeriak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:02
*** bpoulos has left #openstack-meeting-416:02
odyssey4me#startmeeting OpenStack Ansible Meeting16:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 16:02:37 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is odyssey4me. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting'16:02
*** prometheanfire has joined #openstack-meeting-416:02
prometheanfirehi16:02
cloudnullo/16:02
Sam-I-Ammoo16:02
odyssey4me#topic Agenda & rollcall16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Agenda & rollcall (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:02
palendaeo/16:03
odyssey4me#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible#Agenda_for_next_meeting16:03
*** cbits has joined #openstack-meeting-416:03
*** mgariepy has joined #openstack-meeting-416:04
*** Bjoern_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:04
cloudnullpresente16:04
KLevensteino/16:04
njohnstono/16:04
javeriak_o/16:05
prometheanfire0/16:05
jreeveso/16:06
odyssey4mewelcome everyone - no action items from last week, so we can head onwards16:06
Bjoern_o/16:07
odyssey4me#topic Topics for Discussion16:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Topics for Discussion (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:07
*** Bjoern_ is now known as BjoernT16:07
odyssey4me#topic Independent repository for plugins and libraries16:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Independent repository for plugins and libraries (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:07
* odyssey4me hands the mic to cloudnull 16:07
cloudnullhi16:07
cloudnullso i would like to know how we should handle libs and plugins16:08
cloudnullwithin our new independent role repos approach16:08
cloudnulllots of the roles need access to the libs16:08
cloudnulland i'd like to not copy them all over the place16:08
palendaeYou're talking about the openstack service libs? Would a logical place be their associated role?16:09
*** greg_f_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:09
cloudnullat present i've been doing this https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/blob/master/tests/ansible-role-requirements.yml#L1-L416:09
cloudnullpalendae:  the keystone, neutron, etc16:09
cloudnullfor ansible16:09
odyssey4mepalendae if they're only used by that role, yes - but we have cross-role libs16:09
javeriak_what kind of plugins are we talking about, service plugins?16:09
cloudnulljaveriak_:  https://github.com/os-cloud/openstack-ansible-plugins16:10
cloudnullthose ones16:10
palendaeAh, right, we have them up higher now so Ansible can see them across the roles16:10
cloudnullwhich is a collection of https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible/tree/master/playbooks/library and https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible/tree/master/playbooks/plugins16:10
palendaeDependencies could help with that, no?16:10
cloudnullpalendae:  ansible doesnt have deps for libs and plugins sadly16:10
palendaecloudnull: I thought you could put a lib/plugin in a role and it'd be counted through role deps16:11
palendaeOr does their lookup not account for that?16:11
cloudnullso we can submodule or do something similar to what i've done in the role requirements file16:11
*** Prithiv has joined #openstack-meeting-416:11
*** blahRus has joined #openstack-meeting-416:11
cloudnullpalendae:  we can add it to a role16:11
cloudnullbut then we have to add it to all the roles16:11
palendaeOk16:11
*** armax has quit IRC16:11
cloudnullor submodule etc16:11
palendaeSo it's scoped to the role16:11
cloudnullyes16:11
javeriak_cloudnull, you're also trying to upstream the genetric ones to ansible i believe16:11
palendaeAnsible won't use it's role deps to search for libs16:12
cloudnulljaveriak_:  yes16:12
odyssey4methe advantage of using https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/blob/master/tests/ansible-role-requirements.yml#L1-L4 to me is that we never have to manage submodules in each of the repositories... we can fix to a sha if we want to, but don't have to16:12
cloudnullso we have to have a place to put them if the new independent roles are to be used as stand alone roles16:12
*** iyamahat has quit IRC16:12
*** zeih has quit IRC16:13
cloudnullSo I wanted to poll everyone and see what they thought was best.16:13
cloudnullSubmodule, ansible role requires , other?16:13
odyssey4memy initial feel was that perhaps we could do thing differently (eg: make the utility container to interact with keystone, neutron, etc) to isolate where the libraries are needed... but we need the config_template library everywhere... so that's off the table16:14
BjoernTare we caching those roles on the repo server ?16:14
cloudnullWe also need the other  plugins throughout the stack16:14
*** devananda has quit IRC16:15
cloudnullBjoernt no. The libs and plugins exist within the main git tree16:15
palendaeI think the role-requirements file makes sense16:15
odyssey4mecloudnull yep, there are some others that are needed... and while we should endeavour to upstream them, we also need the flexibility of having them around as an interim step to allow us to keep moving forward16:15
prometheanfireso, vendoring?16:16
javeriak_using ansible role requirements seems like the cleaner approach to me; but that would incur maintaining a seperate repository for these now16:16
cloudnullSo I'm good with whatever we deem is best. I just would like a group consensus.16:16
BjoernTI would prefer anything over git submodule :-)16:16
cloudnullJaveriak_ yes it would.16:16
cloudnullI've not proposed the new repo yet because I wasn't sure what to do with them.16:17
prometheanfireI personally prefer using the role reqs as well16:17
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:17
javeriak_well the OSA project is growing, like the others, we will at some point have to separate sub-repos16:17
odyssey4meshall we do a vote?16:18
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-416:18
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:18
odyssey4mealthough, there are no objections to the role reqs approach so far... do we need to bother voting?16:18
odyssey4meare there any specific objections to the role reqs approach?16:18
*** TravT_ has quit IRC16:18
javeriak_aw... i was hoping to see the vote bot again...16:18
cloudnullHahaha16:18
palendaejaveriak_: Yeah, I'm not super happy about more repos, but at the same time, we're going to be making a lot of repos anyway, a single one's probably not that big of a deal in that case16:19
cloudnullOdyssey4me .doit()16:19
prometheanfirecloudnull: .net?16:19
odyssey4meheh, ok16:19
javeriak_palendae agreed16:19
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-416:19
odyssey4me#vote Shall we use the role requirements approach for plugins & libs? yes, no16:20
odyssey4mebah, I'm no good at this16:20
palendae#vote yes16:20
odyssey4me#startvote Shall we use the role requirements approach for plugins & libs? yes, no16:20
openstackBegin voting on: Shall we use the role requirements approach for plugins & libs? Valid vote options are yes, no.16:20
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.16:20
palendae#vote yes16:20
palendae#vote yes16:20
cloudnull#vote yes16:20
javeriak_#vote yes16:20
odyssey4me#vote yes16:20
prometheanfire#vote yes16:20
*** wojdev has quit IRC16:21
cloudnullSomebody vote no just because. ;-)16:21
BjoernT#vote yes16:21
prometheanfireone of us one of us16:21
prometheanfirecloudnull: you're someone16:21
*** devananda has joined #openstack-meeting-416:21
cloudnullI'm nobody.16:21
andymccr#vote no16:21
andymccrboom16:21
cloudnullHahaha !16:22
odyssey4me#endvote16:22
openstackVoted on "Shall we use the role requirements approach for plugins & libs?" Results are16:22
openstackyes (6): palendae, odyssey4me, BjoernT, prometheanfire, cloudnull, javeriak_16:22
openstackno (1): andymccr16:22
cloudnullAndymccr for prez!16:22
andymccrI'm a visionary16:22
odyssey4melol16:22
BjoernTor terrorist16:22
Sam-I-Amandymccr: trump16:22
odyssey4meright, another question was whether we do one repo or two16:22
cloudnullOK I'm done.16:22
andymccri'll be proved right in 2 weeks time!!16:22
javeriak_that was fun :), i know what my fav part of these meetings is now..16:22
andymccr(or we'll all forget that i said anything)16:22
cloudnullI think the single new repo is the best approach.16:23
javeriak_yep, more is usually harder to maintain..16:24
odyssey4meyeah, after reviewing https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/lib/ansible/constants.py I see that there are no defaults paths in /etc/ansible for plugins or libraries... so I'm happy with a single repo and the paths referenced in ansible.cfg16:24
cloudnullI would also like to limit the repo sprawl.16:24
odyssey4mesome of the roles could possible consolidate ;)16:25
odyssey4mebut that's another story, let's not go there16:25
palendaecloudnull: We could put them all in one repo! :)16:25
javeriak_would the new repo be under /openstack too?16:25
palendaejaveriak_: I believe so, cloudnull's got stuff in to the infra team to create them16:25
odyssey4mepalendae the new repositories are already there16:26
odyssey4mehttps://github.com/openstack/?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=openstack-ansible16:26
palendaeCool16:26
odyssey4meall the way through to 'setup-infrastructure' is there - the next roles to move over are the openstack roles16:27
javeriak_wow...16:27
odyssey4meeach role has testing focused on that specific role, so the feedback time is much shorter16:27
cloudnullYup. Once https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255921/ goes through its off to the openstack roles.16:27
odyssey4meok, so one repo it is - unless there are any objections within the next two mins16:28
javeriak_btw is the documentation in place, the deployment flow will change now i believe?16:29
odyssey4me(one repo for the plugins and libs)16:29
odyssey4mejaveriak_ the deployment flow doesn't actually change - the entry points are the same16:29
odyssey4mewhere stuff goes changes16:29
odyssey4methe result is also the same16:30
javeriak_so we're still cloning openstack-ansible and role-requirements will pull in the rest16:30
cloudnullYes16:30
odyssey4meyep16:30
javeriak_ok cool16:30
cloudnullThe change is simply where the role code lives in terms of a full stack deployment.16:30
odyssey4mewhat's also nice is that each role's individual test method shows how to consume them without the dynamic inventory16:30
odyssey4mebut yeah, I would like to spend some time beefing up each role's docs a bit - as developer orientated documentation16:31
cloudnullWe will also be able to create role specific docs. In the future.16:31
cloudnullhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenStackAnsible16:32
cloudnullI updated it yesterday for the roles we split out.16:32
cloudnullBut I'll need to add the new ones.16:32
logan-with IRR are the roles going to be pulled in to /etc/ansible/roles during bootstrap-ansible like the role-requirements currently work?16:32
cloudnullRole docs are limited currently.16:32
odyssey4melogan- yes16:33
logan-ok thanks16:33
odyssey4meok, next topic16:36
odyssey4me#topic Mid Cycle Meetup16:36
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-416:36
*** openstack changes topic to "Mid Cycle Meetup (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:36
odyssey4me#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-December/081847.html16:36
odyssey4me#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-December/009154.html16:36
*** nkrinner has quit IRC16:36
odyssey4mePlease can we have everyone respond to the email indicating your interest.16:38
odyssey4meThis doesn't have to be considered a firm RSVP, so don't worry about that - it's just simply a 'are you interested?' email.16:38
cloudnull++ replied already16:38
*** zeih has quit IRC16:40
cloudnullnext!16:41
odyssey4mealright,16:42
odyssey4me#topic Open discussion16:42
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:42
odyssey4meOther than the call for input in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible#Agenda_for_next_meeting we have nothing further planned16:42
odyssey4meis there anything specific anyone would like to discuss?16:42
odyssey4meheh, a quiet bunch today then :)16:44
Sam-I-Amyep16:44
palendaeI've got nothing else16:44
prometheanfireodyssey4me: hi16:44
prometheanfireyou said to bring this up thursday16:44
prometheanfirehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/253702/16:45
odyssey4meah yes, sure16:46
* odyssey4me hands prometheanfire the mic16:46
prometheanfirethe patch pulls comments out, stored in an ordered list, then inserts them before the regenerated 'data'16:46
prometheanfireit's useful for commented out key value options and general notes people leave in the config16:47
prometheanfireI've brought it up with support and they liked it, major isn't here but he did as well16:47
odyssey4mewhat is the purpose of it, considering that the returned data is unordered16:48
BjoernThow do you separate from a comment or deactivated tokens which have been added for testing ?16:48
odyssey4meie a comment about a line below will no longer be above the line16:48
odyssey4methis only ever matters when the pwgen is run, which I expect is not often16:49
odyssey4meso I really just don't see the point... this just seems like dev work done to solve no problem16:49
odyssey4meso, personally, I'd like to understand the problem this is trying to solve16:50
palendaeYeah, I can get why someone might like to keep comments associated with the given line, but this doesn't appear to do that16:50
odyssey4me^ that16:50
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-416:50
palendaeFrom just glancing over the code, it drops the comments at the top of the file16:51
odyssey4mealso, I don't see why someone would want to run pwgen more than once16:51
odyssey4meif it is, there's always a backup16:51
odyssey4meif anything, I'd say there may be value in keeping datestamped backups16:51
prometheanfireit keeps a backup of the file it overwrites?16:52
cloudnullthats already there16:52
prometheanfirethat'd be better16:52
*** vikram_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:52
odyssey4meyes it does16:52
prometheanfireok16:52
palendaeYeah, we already have backed up copies of files16:52
cloudnullanytime there is a change in the file it writes the old one to a backup16:52
prometheanfireabandoned16:52
odyssey4meso it only keeps one tarballed backup - I can see value in perhaps having 5 backups, datetimestamped or something16:53
palendaeI'd be interested to see if there's a change that associates a line with it's comments, but the way the yaml dump works would make that difficult16:53
palendaeits*16:53
odyssey4meyeah, hardly worth the effort16:53
prometheanfireclose associated bug as well?16:53
odyssey4meI think the right approach for config storage anyway is to use something like git to keep history16:53
*** david-lyle has quit IRC16:53
odyssey4meprometheanfire yep, please16:53
*** sridhar_ram has joined #openstack-meeting-416:55
odyssey4meanything else - we have 5 mins?16:55
*** barrett has joined #openstack-meeting-416:56
*** johnsom has joined #openstack-meeting-416:57
odyssey4mealright, that seems to be it16:57
odyssey4methank you everyone!16:57
odyssey4me#endmeeting16:57
*** openstack changes topic to "Q&A (Meeting topic: openstack-vahana)"16:57
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 16:57:55 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:57
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2015/openstack_ansible_meeting.2015-12-10-16.02.html16:57
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2015/openstack_ansible_meeting.2015-12-10-16.02.txt16:57
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2015/openstack_ansible_meeting.2015-12-10-16.02.log.html16:58
*** prashantD has joined #openstack-meeting-416:59
*** ninag has quit IRC16:59
*** BjoernT has left #openstack-meeting-416:59
*** Sam-I-Am has left #openstack-meeting-417:01
*** mohan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-417:01
*** sanghai_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:01
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-417:02
*** belmoreira has quit IRC17:02
*** prometheanfire has left #openstack-meeting-417:02
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC17:03
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-417:03
*** KLevenstein has left #openstack-meeting-417:03
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-417:04
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-417:04
vikram_no networking-sfc meeting today?17:05
*** matrohon has quit IRC17:05
pcarvervikram_: I'm here, but was waiting for Cathy17:05
vikram_pcarver: ok17:05
pcarverI was on a voice conference call that ran late, but just ended this minute. But I don't really have an agenda to cover for SFC meeting if we don't have a quorum.17:06
*** mgariepy has left #openstack-meeting-417:06
*** dims_ has quit IRC17:06
vikram_nothing from my side either17:08
vikram_mohan_kumar: do you have anything?17:08
mohan_kumarvikram_ , nope17:08
*** zeih has quit IRC17:09
pcarverActually I have one thing, but probably doesn't constute a meeting. Have either of you tested out the new install instructions that Cathy provided?17:10
pcarverI haven't, but that's next on my list.17:10
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-417:10
igordcard_hi all17:11
igordcard_I haven't yet tested because the flow classifier isn't yet up17:11
*** ig0r_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:11
s3wongwhy is the meeting topic "openstack-vahana"?17:11
vikram_s3wong: no one has started it17:12
pcarvers3wong: Cathy isn't here. We haven't decided yet whether we have a quorum to start a meeting.17:12
mohan_kumarpcarver , i too not tried17:12
pcarvermaybe we should17:12
vikram_yes17:12
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-417:12
*** LouisF has joined #openstack-meeting-417:12
vikram_pcarver: can you chair?17:12
LouisF#startmeeting networking-sfc17:12
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 17:12:33 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is LouisF. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:12
s3wongLouisF is here17:12
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:12
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking-sfc)"17:12
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_sfc'17:12
vikram_thank god we got LouisF17:12
LouisFhi all17:12
s3wongnice :-)17:12
LouisFsorry traffic17:12
s3wongfinally not "openstack-vahana" :-)17:13
vikram_no worries ;)17:13
pcarverLouisF: I think that's the wrong meeting name17:13
pcarverthinking about logs here, I think it's supposed to be service_chaining17:13
s3wongservice-chaing?17:13
johnsomo/17:13
s3wong* chaining17:13
LouisF#startmeeting service_chaining17:13
openstackLouisF: Error: Can't start another meeting, one is in progress.  Use #endmeeting first.17:13
LouisF#endmeeting17:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Q&A (Meeting topic: openstack-vahana)"17:13
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 17:13:46 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:13
LouisF#startmeeting service_chaining17:13
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_sfc/2015/networking_sfc.2015-12-10-17.12.html17:13
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_sfc/2015/networking_sfc.2015-12-10-17.12.txt17:13
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_sfc/2015/networking_sfc.2015-12-10-17.12.log.html17:13
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 17:13:49 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is LouisF. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:13
*** vhoward has quit IRC17:13
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:13
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: service_chaining)"17:13
*** javeriak_ has quit IRC17:13
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'service_chaining'17:13
pcarverok, that's better17:14
LouisFhi all17:14
vikram_hey LouisF17:14
LouisFcathy is away today17:14
johnsomo/17:14
LouisFagenda topics?17:14
s3wonghello17:14
pcarverLouisF: I think the main topic is still installation. I haven't tried Cathy's new instructions, but I'd like to hear who has.17:15
*** Prithiv has quit IRC17:15
pcarverI think we should try to merge a devstack change if it's working consistently for people.17:15
LouisFpcarver: agree17:15
*** dims has quit IRC17:16
pcarveroh, another topic I wanted to raise is database table naming. I'm wondering if we should group everything together with an sfc prefix17:16
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-417:17
pcarvere.g. like the ml2 tables are17:17
LouisFpcarver: can you suggest an example17:18
*** Kevin_Zheng has quit IRC17:18
LouisF#topic installation17:18
*** openstack changes topic to "installation (Meeting topic: service_chaining)"17:18
*** javeriak has joined #openstack-meeting-417:19
LouisFhas anyone tried the latest devstack?17:19
pcarverLouisF: example related to the devstack installation topic or the table naming topic17:19
LouisFpcarver: latter lets defer though17:19
pcarverlet's talk devstack first. Who has tried Cathy's latest instructions as posted to the wiki and were you successfult?17:20
LouisFhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/ServiceInsertionAndChaining17:20
igordcard_I haven't as I'm waiting for the flow classifier17:21
mohan_kumarLouisF, Flowclassifier  changes are done ?17:21
LouisFmohan_kumar, igordcard_ the flow classifier should work currently17:22
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC17:23
mohan_kumarLouisF , okay17:23
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting-417:23
igordcard_LouisF: where are the flow classifier methods' implementation?17:23
igordcard_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/233858/15/networking_sfc/services/flowclassifier/plugin.py17:24
LouisFigordcard_: they are implemented in agent.py17:24
vikram_LouisF: We need to have it in plugin.py as well17:24
*** dims has quit IRC17:24
vikram_LouisF: Might be required by other drivers17:24
igordcard_LouisF: so then this file should implement the methods right? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/227100/30/networking_sfc/services/sfc/plugin.py17:25
LouisFvikram_: agree for other drivers17:25
pcarverI don't see the wiki instructions fetching 233858 or 253679 (the latest devstack change)17:25
vikram_LouisF: Is the changes done? Can't find them17:25
LouisFigordcard_: yes17:25
LouisFvikram_: which chnage are you refering to?17:26
pcarverso do the wiki instructions include flow classifier by some other means? Or does following those instructions leave out the fc?17:26
vikram_LouisF: adding FC interfaces in plugin.py17:26
LouisFpcarver: the wiki will install the agent that implements the FC17:27
*** gjayavel_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:27
vikram_LouisF: As pointed out earlier some drivers may required FC's notifications as they come17:27
igordcard_vikram_: +117:27
*** stevelle has joined #openstack-meeting-417:27
vikram_LouisF: I think we discussed this before17:27
*** stevelle has left #openstack-meeting-417:27
*** stevelle has joined #openstack-meeting-417:27
*** stevelle has left #openstack-meeting-417:27
vikram_LouisF: but could not find the code for it.. so just wondering17:28
LouisFvikram_: agree will add to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/233858/15/networking_sfc/services/flowclassifier/plugin.py17:28
vikram_LouisF: ok17:28
igordcard_LouisF: :)17:28
LouisFbut that is not required for the ovs driver implementation17:28
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa17:29
igordcard_LouisF: I don't see how it receives the signals from the API..17:29
LouisFto implement the port chain and associated classifiers the OVS agent queries the DB to get the FC info17:30
LouisFthen sets up the appropriate flows17:30
vikram_LouisF:+117:31
igordcard_oh, okay17:31
*** kproskurin has quit IRC17:31
LouisFset _parse_flow_classifier in agent.py17:32
LouisFsee17:32
LouisFback on topic I will update the wiki to include latest devstack17:33
LouisFthen please try the install procedure17:33
*** gjayave__ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:33
mohan_kumarLouisF , sounds good !17:34
igordcard_LouisF: quick doubt, this should work with ingress=egress port pairs right?17:34
LouisFigordcard_: yes it will, we have tested that17:34
igordcard_LouisF: thanks17:35
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-meeting-417:37
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus17:37
*** gjayavel_ has quit IRC17:37
LouisFonce a chain has been created dump flows should show17:37
LouisFcookie=0x97c3b95c3db61742, duration=76753.949s, table=0, n_packets=4911361, n_bytes=481313378, idle_age=0, hard_age=65534, priority=10,ip,nw_src=10.0.0.15,nw_dst=10.0.0.7 actions=push_mpls:0x8847,load:0x100ff->OXM_OF_MPLS_LABEL[],set_mpls_ttl(255),output:36  cookie=0x97c3b95c3db61742, duration=85074.214s, table=0, n_packets=5007569, n_bytes=490745445, idle_age=0, hard_age=65534, priority=10,mpls actions=resubmit(,5)  cooki17:37
LouisFon br-int17:37
LouisF cookie=0x97c3b95c3db61742, duration=85074.214s, table=0, n_packets=5007569, n_bytes=490745445, idle_age=0, hard_age=65534, priority=10,mpls actions=resubmit(,5)17:38
LouisFcookie=0x97c3b95c3db61742, duration=76753.885s, table=5, n_packets=4911360, n_bytes=481313280, idle_age=0, hard_age=65534, priority=1,mpls,dl_dst=fa:16:3e:07:71:2b,mpls_label=65791 actions=pop_mpls:0x0800,output:317:39
igordcard_LouisF: looks good, thanks for the paste17:40
LouisFi will post these on the wiki17:40
mohan_kumarLouis, add the steps you followed for enable traffic dumps as well17:40
mohan_kumaron service VMs17:41
LouisFok17:41
LouisF sudo  tcpdump  -eni qvo7e79c62d-2317:42
LouisFok please try installation procedure on wiki17:43
mohan_kumarLouisF , Thanks17:43
LouisF#topic database naming17:43
*** openstack changes topic to "database naming (Meeting topic: service_chaining)"17:43
LouisFpcarver: can you give an example17:44
*** cbits has left #openstack-meeting-417:44
pcarverLouisF: so if you do "show tables;" in the database, the SFC tables are scattered around17:45
pcarverif you look at the list of tables, on the other hand you'll see that all the ml2 table names start with ml2_17:45
pcarverNSX and Nuage tables start with nsxv_ and nuage_ respectively17:45
pcarverI'm wondering whether there's a concern over "polluting" the database namespace17:46
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-417:47
pcarvershould we have sfc_port_chains and sfc_flow_classifiers so that all the SFC tables are together in the listing17:47
pcarverand so that it's clear which tables are part of the SFC sub-project as opposed to core Neutron or some other sub-project or extension17:47
LouisFpcarver: agree that would help17:48
LouisFothers?17:48
pcarveranyone else have an opinion?17:48
pcarverI didn't post this to a review because I wanted to get input from the team first17:49
*** degorenko is now known as _degorenko|afk17:49
mohan_kumarpcarver, +1  . It's good to have common prefix , i too thought once17:49
LouisFpcarver: we no dissenting voices ...17:50
LouisFwe have17:50
pcarverif there are no objections, I'm going to post this to the DB related files on review.o.o17:50
LouisFpcarver: ok17:50
pcarvera nuisance to rename all the tables I suppose, but I think we'll be happier in the long run17:51
*** paul-carlton1 has joined #openstack-meeting-417:51
LouisFwe can do that but we reallt need to focus on getting installation tested and the implementation evaluated on as many testbeds as possible17:52
LouisFok any other questions, topics?17:53
*** dims has quit IRC17:53
LouisFgoing, going...17:54
LouisFthanks all17:54
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC17:54
LouisFbye17:54
mohan_kumarBye17:54
pcarverbye17:54
LouisF@endmeeting17:54
LouisF#endmeeting17:55
*** openstack changes topic to "Q&A (Meeting topic: openstack-vahana)"17:55
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 17:55:00 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:55
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/service_chaining/2015/service_chaining.2015-12-10-17.13.html17:55
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/service_chaining/2015/service_chaining.2015-12-10-17.13.txt17:55
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/service_chaining/2015/service_chaining.2015-12-10-17.13.log.html17:55
*** johnsom has left #openstack-meeting-417:56
*** Allison_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:57
*** Allison_ is now known as Guest3693617:57
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-417:57
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-417:58
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-418:01
*** Guest36936 has quit IRC18:02
barrett#startmeeting Openstack Diversity Working Group18:04
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 10 18:04:26 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is barrett. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:04
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:04
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Openstack Diversity Working Group)"18:04
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_diversity_working_group'18:04
barrettHi folks - let's start with roll call18:04
barrett#topic roll call18:05
*** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: Openstack Diversity Working Group)"18:05
*** s3wong has quit IRC18:05
barrettAnyone here for the Diversity WG team meeting?18:06
*** aprice has joined #openstack-meeting-418:06
*** gothicmindfood has joined #openstack-meeting-418:07
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-418:08
rockygo/18:08
barrettHi Rockyg18:08
rockygHey ;-)18:09
barrettI put a note in the openstack-diversity channel to redirect people here....18:09
barrettNot sure we have a quorum to get anything done today.18:09
rockygGood question.18:09
barrettIs  Cindy Pallares here?18:09
*** gjayave__ has quit IRC18:10
*** jmckind has quit IRC18:10
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-418:11
barrettRockyG - Think we should wrap this one up for now. Next team meeting at this time will be Jan 7th.18:12
rockygSounds good to me.18:12
*** dims has quit IRC18:12
rockygTalk to you Monday in the next meeting?18:12
barrettSounds good - enjoy your weekend!18:13
rockygYou, too!18:13
*** aprice has quit IRC18:13
barrettThanks18:13
barrett#endmeeting18:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Q&A (Meeting topic: openstack-vahana)"18:13
*** rockyg has left #openstack-meeting-418:13
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 10 18:13:56 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:13
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_diversity_working_group/2015/openstack_diversity_working_group.2015-12-10-18.04.html18:14
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_diversity_working_group/2015/openstack_diversity_working_group.2015-12-10-18.04.txt18:14
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_diversity_working_group/2015/openstack_diversity_working_group.2015-12-10-18.04.log.html18:14
*** barrett has left #openstack-meeting-418:14
*** dandruta has quit IRC18:14
*** amit213 has quit IRC18:14
*** amit213 has joined #openstack-meeting-418:15
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-418:19
*** delatte has joined #openstack-meeting-418:20
*** LouisF has quit IRC18:23
*** delattec has quit IRC18:23
*** sanghai___ has joined #openstack-meeting-418:24
*** sanghai___ has quit IRC18:25
*** delatte has quit IRC18:32
*** delatte has joined #openstack-meeting-418:33
*** vikram_ has quit IRC18:35
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC18:36
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-418:36
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-418:36
*** bharathm has joined #openstack-meeting-418:38
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-418:38
*** sanghai_ has quit IRC18:40
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC18:48
*** kebray has quit IRC18:49
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC18:50
*** mohan_kumar has quit IRC18:54
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-418:56
*** paul-carlton1 has quit IRC18:59
*** paul-carlton1 has joined #openstack-meeting-419:02
*** delatte has quit IRC19:06
*** delatte has joined #openstack-meeting-419:07
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2419:11
*** paul-carlton1 has quit IRC19:11
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-419:13
*** kebray has quit IRC19:14
*** sridhar_ram has joined #openstack-meeting-419:17
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC19:17
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-419:18
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC19:18
*** chaozhechen_ has quit IRC19:18
*** Prithiv has joined #openstack-meeting-419:22
*** delattec has joined #openstack-meeting-419:35
*** delatte has quit IRC19:38
*** klamath has quit IRC19:44
*** wojdev has quit IRC19:45
*** baoli_ has quit IRC19:53
*** javeriak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-419:56
*** javeriak_ has quit IRC19:56
*** javeriak has quit IRC19:59
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC20:02
*** bpokorny has quit IRC20:07
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-420:07
*** armax has quit IRC20:09
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:10
*** rbak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-420:11
*** rbak has quit IRC20:15
*** prashantD has quit IRC20:18
*** sridhar_ram has joined #openstack-meeting-420:22
*** prashantD has joined #openstack-meeting-420:24
*** bobh has quit IRC20:31
*** dims has quit IRC20:35
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-420:35
*** Swami has quit IRC20:44
*** seanmurphy has quit IRC20:51
*** banix has quit IRC20:58
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-420:59
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-421:09
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa21:10
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2421:10
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-421:13
*** julim has quit IRC21:14
*** baoli has quit IRC21:20
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-421:21
*** trozet has joined #openstack-meeting-421:21
*** dilyin has quit IRC21:28
*** ativelkov has quit IRC21:28
*** ativelkov has joined #openstack-meeting-421:29
*** dilyin has joined #openstack-meeting-421:30
*** Prithiv has quit IRC21:30
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-421:31
*** baoli has quit IRC21:32
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-421:33
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC21:34
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting-421:34
*** u_kozat has joined #openstack-meeting-421:40
*** baoli has quit IRC21:44
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-421:45
*** dslevin has joined #openstack-meeting-421:47
*** jmckind_ has joined #openstack-meeting-421:51
*** baoli has quit IRC21:52
*** Swami has quit IRC21:52
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-421:53
*** jmckind has quit IRC21:54
*** baoli has quit IRC22:00
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-422:01
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-422:09
*** u_kozat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-422:09
*** hogepodge has quit IRC22:10
*** delattec has quit IRC22:10
*** jmckind_ has quit IRC22:10
*** daneyon_ has quit IRC22:11
*** u_kozat has quit IRC22:12
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC22:12
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-422:13
*** baoli has quit IRC22:13
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-422:13
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-422:14
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting-422:15
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-422:20
*** yamahata has quit IRC22:24
*** baoli has quit IRC22:24
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-422:24
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-422:25
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-422:26
*** Swami has quit IRC22:27
*** baoli has quit IRC22:36
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-422:37
*** dslevin has quit IRC22:42
*** dslevin has joined #openstack-meeting-422:43
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-422:43
*** trozet has quit IRC22:43
*** sdake has quit IRC22:44
*** sdake_ has quit IRC22:46
*** baoli has quit IRC22:48
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-422:49
*** david-lyle has quit IRC22:55
*** dslevin has quit IRC22:55
*** armax has quit IRC23:00
*** baoli has quit IRC23:01
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-423:01
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC23:01
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-423:01
*** baoli has quit IRC23:07
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-423:11
*** baoli has quit IRC23:17
*** dslevin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-423:29
*** dslevin_ has quit IRC23:33
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-meeting-423:42
*** u_kozat_ has quit IRC23:42
*** jwang has quit IRC23:43
*** jwang has joined #openstack-meeting-423:47
*** blahRus has quit IRC23:54
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-423:56
*** rbak_ has quit IRC23:58
*** klamath has joined #openstack-meeting-423:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!