Wednesday, 2017-02-08

*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-500:53
*** Liwei has quit IRC00:59
*** tiger has joined #openstack-meeting-500:59
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-500:59
Liweihello?00:59
*** tiger is now known as Guest8120800:59
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:00
Guest81208hi01:00
*** LiXiang has joined #openstack-meeting-501:01
*** mafei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:02
*** Guest81208 has quit IRC01:03
LiXiangHello~ Is it China Interop meeting?01:04
mafeiyes01:07
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:07
LiXiang9:30?01:07
mafeiyes01:07
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:09
*** joycc has joined #openstack-meeting-501:10
*** WangChangJin has joined #openstack-meeting-501:11
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:12
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:14
*** t2cloud has joined #openstack-meeting-501:14
*** joycc has quit IRC01:15
*** WangChangJin has quit IRC01:15
*** fiberhome-joycc has joined #openstack-meeting-501:16
*** WangChangJin has joined #openstack-meeting-501:16
*** LiXiang is now known as Lixiang-ZTE01:16
*** wenwen has joined #openstack-meeting-501:20
*** zuozongming has joined #openstack-meeting-501:20
*** wenwen has quit IRC01:23
*** wenwen has joined #openstack-meeting-501:24
*** kongwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:26
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:26
*** backup has joined #openstack-meeting-501:27
*** wenwen has quit IRC01:27
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:27
*** xietaotao has joined #openstack-meeting-501:27
kongweihi 谢涛涛01:27
kongwei:)01:27
xietaotaohi, :)01:27
mafei看来已经有好多人进来了01:28
*** backup has quit IRC01:29
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-501:29
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:29
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting-501:29
mafei#startmeeting interop_challenge01:30
openstackMeeting started Wed Feb  8 01:30:02 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mafei. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.01:30
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.01:30
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"01:30
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'interop_challenge'01:30
mafeiOk,我们开始会议,今天都谁在互操作的会上?打个招呼吧01:30
mafei我们今天会议的议题如下:01:30
mafei#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/interop-challenge-china-meeting-2017-02-0801:30
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:30
mafei第一个议题:01:31
mafei#topic Happy Chinese new year01:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Happy Chinese new year (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"01:31
*** zuozongming has quit IRC01:31
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:31
mafei新的一年,祝大家新年快乐,鸡年大吉01:31
tonglio/01:31
Lixiang-ZTEo/01:31
kongweio/01:31
xietaotao大家新年快乐:)01:31
mafei下一个议题:01:32
WangChangJin新年快乐01:32
mafei#topic What about the deployment of the LAMP workload01:32
*** openstack changes topic to "What about the deployment of the LAMP workload (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"01:32
tongli@mafei, @Lixiang-ZTE, @xietaotao, happy Chinese New Year folks. very happy to see everyone here.01:32
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:32
t2cloud大家新年快乐!01:32
Lixiang-ZTE新年快乐~01:32
mafei1月份的训练营上希望大家在年前完成LAMP的部署,不知道各家是否完成部署?或者计划何时完成?01:32
mafei麻烦回复xx公司已完成,或者xx公司计划何时完成01:33
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:33
*** daisyguo has joined #openstack-meeting-501:34
daisyguogood morning01:34
t2cloud云途腾己完成01:34
mafeiok01:34
mafeigood01:34
tianquan因年底冲刺项目有拖延,北京云英计划本周日(2月12日)前完成01:34
xietaotao浪潮已完成。01:34
*** daisyguo has quit IRC01:34
mafei好的,加油01:35
*** daisyguo has joined #openstack-meeting-501:35
mafei因为今天我们将开始下一个workload,所以还请大家往前赶01:35
daisyguo早上好01:35
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:36
mafei早上好daisy01:36
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:36
mafei中兴结果呢?01:36
mafei@kongwei01:36
tongli我记得有家公司会提交一个patch to fix the problem with the root access.01:36
tongliI have not see the patch, can we get that patch submitted?01:37
mafei好像是云途腾吧01:37
tongliwhen install wordpress tool, if use root, it fails without an option.01:37
kongweizte 已经完成lamp测试01:37
tongliit should be a very simple patch. can someone please submit the patch?01:37
mafei@kongwei,ok01:37
*** changhongli has joined #openstack-meeting-501:37
t2cloud关于root access,刚测试完,马上会提交01:38
mafei烽火呢?01:38
mafei情况如何?01:38
*** wenwen has joined #openstack-meeting-501:38
mafeiok,@t2cloud01:38
tongli@t2cloud, great. great. add my name to the reviewer, so that I can review it quickly.01:38
*** zuozongming has joined #openstack-meeting-501:38
*** WangChangJin has quit IRC01:38
mafei好的,大家都加油01:39
fiberhome-joycc烽火这边测试人员年前在客户现场忙其他项目,现在正在测试,计划本周内完成01:39
mafei下一个议题:01:39
*** WangChangJin has joined #openstack-meeting-501:39
t2cloud@tongli  ok01:39
*** wenwen has quit IRC01:39
mafeiok,@fiberhome-joycc01:40
mafei#topic Decide when to finish the deployment of  the dockerswarm workload01:40
*** openstack changes topic to "Decide when to finish the deployment of the dockerswarm workload (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"01:40
mafei下一步我们计划部署dockerswarm,大家认为需要多长时间?两周是否可以?01:40
tonglisince we will be working on kubernetes, is it absolutely necessary to run the dockerswarm workload? @mafei.01:41
*** marven has joined #openstack-meeting-501:41
tongliI mean kubernetes workload, I am writing it right now.01:41
*** wenwen has joined #openstack-meeting-501:41
*** daisyguo has quit IRC01:42
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:42
*** daisyguo has joined #openstack-meeting-501:42
*** wenwen has quit IRC01:42
tongliare we having people dropping off?01:42
mafei我觉得可以同步进行01:43
tongli@mafei, sure, that is fine.01:43
mafeii am here01:43
mafei其他人意见呢01:43
tongliI saw that Liwei and wenwen both left.01:43
*** marven has quit IRC01:43
*** daisyguo has quit IRC01:44
mafeimaybe the network is bad @tongli01:44
*** Daisy has joined #openstack-meeting-501:44
*** daisyguo has joined #openstack-meeting-501:44
*** daisyguo has quit IRC01:44
tongliok.01:45
DaisyI'm here01:45
Daisytongli: Docker swarm的难度有多大?01:45
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:45
tongli@Daisy, easier than lampstack.01:45
Daisyok01:45
tongliit is relatively smaller.01:45
tongli@mafei, probably run it to get a feeling about.01:46
kongweidocker测试是否也需要连接互联网?01:46
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:46
xietaotaodockerswarm 依赖coreos,国内拉取coreos会不会很痛苦哦?01:46
tonglisorry guys, input Chinese from my side is slow, hope that using English is ok with everyone, if not, I will try to type in Chinese.01:46
Daisytongli: 我想mafei可能是想多测一个workload,k8s和nfv还在开发过程中。01:46
kongwei测试的结果怎么提交到社区啊?01:47
mafei@Daisy, that`s right01:47
Daisytongli: 如果k8s开发完毕,可以给大家测试了,那么直接测k8s也可以。01:47
tongli@xietaotao, you only need to get coreos image once and place it in your glance, one time, you do not have to do it everytime you run the workload.01:47
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:47
*** makai has joined #openstack-meeting-501:48
xietaotao@tongli, OK01:48
tongli@Daisy,@mafei, it is ok to run dockerswarm now, try it and see.01:48
mafei因为k8s和NVF还在开发阶段,所以我们还是先去跑一下dockerswarm01:48
*** wenwen has joined #openstack-meeting-501:48
Daisymafei: dockerswarm这个大家都没有做过,不知道2周能不能完成。01:49
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:49
mafei一是可以找一下感觉,二来也可以为4月份的展示做一个储备01:49
mafei如果没有问题,我们就安排2周左右的时间来进行部署01:49
mafeiok?01:49
tongli@mafei, good idea.01:49
xietaotao@mafei, 好的01:49
tongli@Daisy, 2 weeks should be enough.01:50
Daisy好的,同意。01:50
mafeiok01:50
t2cloud好的01:50
*** wenwen has quit IRC01:50
mafei下一个议题:01:50
fiberhome-joyccOK01:50
mafei#topic Decide who to develop the k8s and NFV workload01:50
*** openstack changes topic to "Decide who to develop the k8s and NFV workload (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"01:50
Daisy我记得春节之前的会上讨论过这个。01:51
mafeik8s和NFV两个workload正在开发中01:51
mafei还有谁要参与其中01:51
Daisytongli: 能讲讲k8s的进展吗?01:51
kongweizte在做nfv的工作了01:52
mafeigood01:52
mafei@kongwei01:52
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:52
kongwei:)01:52
mafei其他公司呢01:52
Lixiang-ZTEZTE非常愿意做NFV相关的workload01:52
tongli@Lixiang-ZTE, great. thanks a lot.01:53
tonglican you describe the flow?01:53
mafeicloudin云英01:53
mafei浪潮01:53
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:53
mafei中国移动苏研01:53
tonglisuch as this for lampstack.01:53
tongli1. Provision VMs, 2. create security group, rules, 3, install related software, 4 , setup database etc.01:53
*** hongliang has joined #openstack-meeting-501:54
tonglinow for NFV, what is the use case or scenarios, can you describe it?01:54
Lixiang-ZTE@tongli 具体内容现在@kongwei 和 @WangChangJin在做工作01:54
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:54
DaisyLiwei: 我们正在讨论nfv,你那边有什么新的进展吗?01:55
tongli@Lixiang-ZTE, ok, if you can ask them to just create that flow, that will be nice.01:55
Lixiang-ZTE@01:55
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:55
WangChangJinNFV的场景,我有两个提议01:55
WangChangJin1.VNF基于ZTE的网元来进行构造01:56
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-501:56
Lixiang-ZTE@tongli 另外有个问题还请帮忙。我们按照openstak interop challenge页面的要求发邮件请求加入,但是没收到回应。你看能否麻烦你这边知会社区一下接纳我们的申请?01:56
Lixiang-ZTE谢谢01:56
WangChangJin大家认为如何?01:57
tonglioh, @Lixiang-ZTE, you mean that you tried to subscribe to the mailing list and there was no response?01:57
kongweiyes01:57
DaisyWangChangJin: 我只看到一个提议。1.VNF基于ZTE的网元来进行构造 另外一个是什么?01:57
Lixiang-ZTE孔炜请求的,但是没收到回应01:57
tongli@Lixiang-ZTE, ok. will check into that.01:57
Lixiang-ZTEthank you very much!01:58
kongwei我已经收到订阅邮件了。但是有个申请被拒绝01:58
tongliwhich part was rejected?01:58
*** Liwei has quit IRC01:58
*** liuhaijie has joined #openstack-meeting-501:59
mafeiNFV现在应该华为、移动、中兴都可以参与01:59
mafei国内的SDN/NFV联盟的互操作工作组也有这方面的意向,还在沟通中,但是觉得NFV是一个比较大的框架,最好先做哪个层次的脚本,需要评估可行性。01:59
mafei看看李彤的想法吧01:59
mafeifrom  liwei01:59
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-502:00
tongli@mafei, I think we start with small and easy one, can have many revisions.02:00
tonglibut the small and easy one should represent typical use case.02:00
kongwei我发了一封邮件“zte want to join the interop challenge” 想把我们测试的内容提交到社区。这个邮件被rejected了@tongli02:00
WangChangJinNFV最简单的场景也比LAMP复杂的多,这个大家要有心理准备,呵呵02:01
tonglithe problem is that I do not know what is the typical use case as I have no NFV experiences, I think we rely on experts here in this channel02:01
tongli@kongwei, if your subscription is in the process queue, the email will be rejected.02:01
hongliang大家好,我是EasyStack的,很高兴和大家一起交流02:01
Lixiang-ZTEWangChangJin is this kind of expert :-)02:01
Daisyhongliang: 欢迎02:02
*** Liwei has quit IRC02:02
mafei@tongli   i agree02:02
kongwei@tongli 那么是不是需要重新发邮件申请啊?02:02
tongli@kongwei, give it couple of days, you should receive an email on if the subscription is accepted or not.02:02
tonglithen send the email again.02:02
WangChangJinLAMP部署完成后,可以让大家有个直观的感受最终的结果02:02
mafei欢迎@hongliang02:02
tongli@hongliang, welcome.02:02
kongwei好的。十分感谢@tongli02:02
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-502:02
WangChangJinNFV部署后,如果做不到端到端,直观用户感受很难体验02:03
Daisy那就通过社区的邮件列表继续nfv的细节的讨论?02:03
liuhaijieI've been working in Ericsson for 7+ years, and 3 years PC/NFV experience. I may share my effort if needed.02:03
tongli@kongwei, 不用客气。we are all brothers and sisters. I feel very much at home.02:03
*** Liwei has quit IRC02:04
mafeinice  @liuhaijie02:04
tongli@liuhaijie, that will be awesome.02:04
Daisy我来记录action item吧。02:04
tongli@liuhaijie, if you can provide some work flow (use case), then we can have some discussions in this work group.02:04
mafeiok,@Daisy02:05
tongliI think we should just write #action02:05
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-502:05
Lixiang-ZTE我觉得最好能实现一个打通电话的场景。这个利于演示。02:05
tongli#action T2Cloud submit the patch to fix root access issue on lampstack02:05
mafeiok02:05
Lixiang-ZTE去年summit上OPNFV那个拿大剪刀剪光纤的效果很好,哈哈。02:05
tongli#action Liuhaijie to provide some details on NFV use cases or at least thoughts since his expereiences in the past.02:06
Lixiang-ZTEinterop如果有也有实际的电话业务演示感觉会更令人感兴趣02:06
liuhaijie@tongli there is a white paper from ITU, regarding to NFV use case. I can share it later.02:06
tongliI think when we do something like that, it automatically list these things in a file we can later refer to.02:06
Daisy#action all to start dockerswarm testing and update progress in the next meeting02:06
*** Liwei has quit IRC02:06
mafeiany other action?02:07
tongli@liuhaijie, yes, that is nice, but if you can take the typical use case out and share with folks, that will be nicer. you know people are very busy.02:07
tongli#action each company should run dockerswarm and complete within two weeks.02:07
mafeiok02:08
liuhaijieFor a phone call, we need much more functions in telecom, i.e., packet core, eNode B, etc. It need strong support from telecom companies.02:08
tonglibtw, Boston summit will have another big interop show, do not know what yet.02:08
mafei#action02:08
tonglithat is the latest news I got.02:08
tongliany good ideas will be appreciated very much.02:09
liuhaijie@tongli understood, i'll figure out some 'typical' cases.02:09
*** changhongli has quit IRC02:09
*** wenwen has joined #openstack-meeting-502:09
Daisy#action CloudIn and FiberHome to finish LAMP test by this week02:09
tonglithat will be the message also for ZTE brothers and sisters.02:09
Daisytongli: glad to see there will be another interop show in Boston. Our Chinese companies can join the show.02:10
Lixiang-ZTEonly brothers now , hahah02:10
tongli@Daisy, absolutely, I would love to see all these telecom companies to be represented on the stage.02:10
tonglithat will be absolutely awesome.02:11
tongliof course, other players as well.02:11
tonglithe more, the merrier02:11
Daisyshall we move to next topic ?02:11
*** wenwen has quit IRC02:11
mafeiok02:11
mafei下一个议题:02:12
mafei#topic Discuss how to write the white paper about openstack interop02:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Discuss how to write the white paper about openstack interop (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"02:12
*** Liwei has joined #openstack-meeting-502:12
mafei互操作的白皮书02:12
Daisy白皮书,先从目录开始吧?02:12
mafei我梳理了一个框架02:12
mafei大家可以提提意见02:12
Daisymafei: awesome02:12
mafei一、openstack互操作简介02:13
mafei二、开展openstack互操作目的02:13
mafei三、开源社区互操作情况02:13
mafei四、互操作应用场景02:13
mafei五、互操作遇到的问题02:13
mafei1.1 什么是openstack互操作02:14
mafei1.2 openstack互操作的内容02:14
mafei4.1 LAMP02:14
mafei4.2 dockerswarm02:14
mafei4.3 k8s02:14
mafei4.4 NFV02:14
mafei4.5 其他02:14
*** Liwei has quit IRC02:15
mafei看看有何意见02:15
tongligood start @Daisy, thanks.02:15
tongliwe probably can add that these work loads will be very much targeting the Openstack certification processes.02:16
mafei另外,大家如果对那部分感兴趣,也可以参与一下02:16
*** changhongli has joined #openstack-meeting-502:16
tonglithese word should be part of the purposes of the interop challenge effort.02:16
Daisymafei: 看起来不错。02:16
mafei其他人有无意见02:18
tongli@mafei, thanks for putting it together, looks nice. maybe add some part like lesson's learnt02:18
Daisytongli: good suggestion02:19
tonglithese section normally are valuable to service providers.02:19
Daisy"五、互操作遇到的问题"改为“五、互操作遇到的问题及建议”?02:19
mafeisorry, what about  lesson's learnt02:19
tongli@mafei, plus, we already have a document in the current project, you can simply copy and paste (maybe translate).02:19
mafeiok,daisy02:19
tonglithis is good because we are all part of the interop challenge, so there is no stealing material problem.02:20
mafeigood, tongli02:20
mafeiok02:20
Daisymafei: 就是一些互操作性的经验和最佳实践的分享02:20
*** changhongli has quit IRC02:20
mafeiok02:20
Daisymafei: litong说社区里面有一些英文文档了。可以参考02:20
mafei恩  明白02:21
*** zuozongming has quit IRC02:21
mafei我们还有十分钟02:21
Daisy没有意见就下一个话题了?02:21
mafei最后一个议题02:21
Lixiang-ZTE我觉得是否可以不需要4.5其他?如果我们有openstack社区中没有的场景,就按场景分类单列。02:21
mafeiok02:21
mafeigood02:22
Lixiang-ZTE防止其他这节成为大杂烩02:22
mafei好主意02:22
mafei#topic Discuss how to show the interop challenge on the global cloud computing summit in April02:22
*** openstack changes topic to "Discuss how to show the interop challenge on the global cloud computing summit in April (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"02:22
Daisy好,同意。02:22
mafei讨论下4月份峰会的演示02:22
Daisy希望能够邀请到重量级的嘉宾来主持这个部分。02:22
mafei我们也计划邀请openstack基金会的高层过来主持,但这取决于我们可以展示的东西和效果02:22
Daisymafei: 也取决于这个会议的规模02:23
tongli@mafei, yes, agree02:23
mafei集思广益02:23
*** fiberhome-joycc has quit IRC02:23
mafeitongli,你有何建议02:23
Lixiang-ZTE谁厉害把jonathan抓来  :-D02:24
mafei首先得看我们也展示的东西02:24
mafei先自身强02:24
DaisyLAMP不适合再演示一遍了。如果K8s或者NFV能够完成,我感觉新的usecase比较好。02:24
mafeik8s或NVF时间上是否来得及02:25
Lixiang-ZTE具体4月什么时候?02:25
Daisy4月19日20日02:25
mafei4月19-20日02:25
Lixiang-ZTENFV感觉会太紧张02:25
tonglik8s is an cadidate, but I think number of people attending is the most important factor.02:25
DaisyBoston峰会在这个之后一个月,不知道峰会上打算演示什么。02:25
tongli@Daisy, do not know yet.02:26
mafei4月份的峰会规模在3000-4000好像02:26
Daisymafei: wow, amazing number02:26
*** fiberhome-joycc has joined #openstack-meeting-502:26
Lixiang-ZTE@mafei 这么大啊?02:26
Lixiang-ZTE没想到02:26
Daisyk8s大约什么时间能够给大家测试?02:27
Daisytongli: k8s大约什么时间能够开始给大家测试?02:27
mafei我们的演示安排在主会场上02:27
mafei应该是第二天上午02:27
mafei也就是20日上午02:27
*** fiberhome-joycc has quit IRC02:28
tongli@Daisy, do not know yet, I have few issues to resolve first.02:28
tongliI am hoping I can resolve these issues in next couple of weeks.02:28
Daisytongli: ok02:28
Daisy我想大家至少需要提前一个半月开始测试吧?02:28
*** fiberhome-joycc has joined #openstack-meeting-502:29
mafei时间快要到了,我们是否可以继续讨论02:29
Daisymafei: 没人占会议室就可以继续讨论。02:29
mafei或者,我们下周三在讨论峰会演示的话题02:30
Daisy这个会议是一周一次吗?02:30
mafei好像是一周一次的02:30
Daisy哦。02:30
Daisyok02:30
tongliit was reserved once a week, but I think we decided to have it every other week.02:31
fiberhome-joyccok02:31
tongliwe are free to use it every week though.02:31
tongli#action decide who to update the wiki page02:31
mafei峰会的演示确实需要好好讨论下,大家也可以在这周内思考下如何演示会更好02:32
*** zuozongming has joined #openstack-meeting-502:32
tongliI think Daisy has been doing that, I prefer an non-ibmer does that for us.02:32
Daisytongli: 有什么需要更新的啊?我可以去做。:)02:32
tonglithe meeting information & the etherpad link need to be updated each week.02:33
tonglilike time, etc02:33
Daisy我去做吧。一回生两回熟。02:33
mafei原计划我们想二周一次会02:33
mafei但是峰会的事还没有讨论好,所以我们是否下周继续讨论02:34
Daisymafei: 会后你可以试一下看能不能更新wiki,如果能的话,以后你可以直接去更新。02:34
mafei如何更新?02:34
Daisy会后跟你说。02:34
mafei好的02:35
mafei那好吧,今天的会议就到这儿吧02:35
mafei感谢大家的参与02:35
tongli@Daisy,@mafei, need to end the meeting I think.02:35
mafeii02:35
Daisy谢谢@mafei, @tongli, all02:35
mafeii know02:35
tongli@mafei, great.02:35
mafeitongli, good night02:35
tongliThanks a lot.02:35
mafei#endmeeting02:36
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"02:36
openstackMeeting ended Wed Feb  8 02:36:03 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)02:36
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2017/interop_challenge.2017-02-08-01.30.html02:36
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2017/interop_challenge.2017-02-08-01.30.txt02:36
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2017/interop_challenge.2017-02-08-01.30.log.html02:36
tonglithis is very nice,02:36
tongliclick on any of the link above to see what it does.02:37
tonglihttp://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2017/interop_challenge.2017-02-08-01.30.html02:37
tonglithat link already shows all the action items02:37
*** tongli has quit IRC02:38
Lixiang-ZTEbye02:38
*** Lixiang-ZTE has quit IRC02:38
*** mafei has quit IRC02:39
*** fiberhome-joycc has quit IRC02:39
*** xietaotao has quit IRC02:39
*** hongliang has quit IRC02:42
*** liuhaijie has quit IRC02:49
*** makai has quit IRC02:51
*** Daisy has quit IRC02:58
*** WangChangJin has quit IRC03:04
*** Rockyg has quit IRC03:12
*** makai has joined #openstack-meeting-503:12
*** makai has quit IRC03:15
*** makai has joined #openstack-meeting-503:15
*** wenwen has joined #openstack-meeting-503:24
*** wenwen has quit IRC03:28
*** kongwei has quit IRC03:30
*** makai has quit IRC03:35
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-503:55
*** tianquan has quit IRC04:31
*** makai has joined #openstack-meeting-505:29
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-505:36
*** makai has quit IRC07:43
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-507:48
*** t2cloud has quit IRC08:21
*** t2cloud has joined #openstack-meeting-508:21
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-508:56
*** tianquan has quit IRC09:01
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-509:01
*** ralonsoh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-509:05
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC09:05
*** tianquan has quit IRC09:11
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-509:13
*** tianquan has quit IRC09:22
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-509:23
*** tianquan has quit IRC09:23
*** ricolin has quit IRC09:24
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-509:38
*** luzC- has joined #openstack-meeting-509:42
*** topol_ has joined #openstack-meeting-509:44
*** topol has quit IRC09:45
*** luzC has quit IRC09:45
*** luzC- is now known as luzC09:45
*** ralonsoh__ has joined #openstack-meeting-510:02
*** ralonsoh_ has quit IRC10:04
*** ralonsoh__ is now known as ralonsoh10:06
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-510:09
*** t2cloud has quit IRC10:18
*** zuozongming has quit IRC11:09
*** ricolin has quit IRC11:54
*** tianquan has quit IRC12:46
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-513:30
*** zhipengh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-513:31
*** tianquan has quit IRC13:35
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-513:36
*** zhipengh_ has quit IRC13:42
*** matrohon has quit IRC13:44
*** zhipengh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-513:45
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-513:50
*** zhipengh_ has quit IRC13:54
*** HelenYao has joined #openstack-meeting-513:54
*** zhipengh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-513:59
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting-513:59
topol_Ping dmellado tongli gema zhipengh markvoelker daniela_ebert skazi luzC14:00
markvoelkero/14:00
tonglio/14:01
dmelladoo/14:01
topol_#startmeeting interop_challenge14:01
openstackMeeting started Wed Feb  8 14:01:02 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is topol_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
zhipengh_o/14:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"14:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'interop_challenge'14:01
HelenYaoo/14:01
topol_Hi everyone, who is here for the interop challenge meeting today?14:01
topol_The agenda for today can be found at:14:01
topol_# https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/interop-challenge-meeting-2017-02-0814:01
topol_We can use this same etherpad to take notes14:01
skazio/14:01
topol_Agenda:14:01
topol_    #topic Review last meeting action items14:02
topol_     #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2017/interop_challenge.2017-02-01-14.00.html14:02
topol_topol to create a ping reminder list for our meeting attendees14:02
topol_this is done, let me know if I need to add someone to the list14:02
topol_topol add agenda item for update from China chapter meeting14:02
topol_this is done as well14:02
topol_next last meeting action item:14:03
topol_tongli to try some thing on the patch14:03
topol_    , tong will figure out versions of ansible and shade to be supported by lampstack workload14:03
topol_tongli any progress on these?14:03
tongli@topol, I have not had time to try different version of ansible /shade on this, heads down on k8s.14:03
tongli@topol, sorry.14:04
topol_K, no worries, we will keep it on the list :-)14:04
tonglitrying to get k8s in a shape that I can submit a patch.14:04
dmelladoyep, please, I'll try to take some time to test that out too14:04
topol_tongli sounds good.14:04
dmelladoworst case let's sync on the PTG14:04
tongli@dmellado, thanks.14:05
topol_Okay, todays agenda which is action packed:14:05
*** daniela_ebert has joined #openstack-meeting-514:05
topol_#topic Patches that need review  https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/interop-workloads,n,z14:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Patches that need review https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/interop-workloads,n,z (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"14:05
luzCo/14:05
tonglione is the tox thing, and the other is the root access for wordpress deployment in lampstack.14:06
topol_2 two patches out there, all please review.  anything specific we need to discuss about the patches?14:06
tonglithe problem was that if you use root to deploy wordpress, it will fail.14:06
topol_#action all please review patches #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/interop-workloads,n,z14:07
tonglithere needs to be an option, china chapter (T2Cloud) submitted that patch.14:07
*** gema has joined #openstack-meeting-514:07
topol_so with #link we are waiting for dmellado to push a new patch?14:07
topol_er #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409180/14:08
dmelladoI'll push a patch as soon as I sync with tongli on the ansible versions14:08
topol_dmellado, excellent THANKS14:08
dmelladoas it is, it would work, but we might want to be more open on that14:08
topol_#action dmellado to push a new patch for #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409180/14:08
topol_zhengming will you push a new patch for #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430631/14:10
topol_?14:10
topol_tongli is that a china team patch?14:10
tongli@topol, zhengming's patch is good. that flag is necessary.14:10
tongli@topol, yes, it is. after we run the workload while I was in China, we found this problem, and discussed the patch.14:11
topol_tongli it has a -1 from markvoelker14:11
tongliyes, since Mark did not know the reason why it is needed, I have answered his question14:11
tonglithis is a necessary fix.14:11
markvoelkerWe should get that kind of information into the commit message though.  The commit message really gives no indication about why we're doing this.14:12
zhipengh_but still need a patch right ?14:12
zhipengh_agree with mark here14:12
tongli@markvoelker, sure.14:12
topol_markvoelker +++ was just about to say that14:12
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting-514:12
tongliadd a bit of info in the commit msg. Let me add some comment there.14:12
chandankumar\o/14:13
topol_#action tongli to follow up to make sure commit message gets updated in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430631/14:13
dmelladoo/ chandankumar14:13
topol_K, think we are getting close to the fun stuff :-)14:13
topol_#topic review last weeks networking choice14:14
*** openstack changes topic to "review last weeks networking choice (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"14:14
topol_just FYI, We have decided to use flat GCE like networking choice for our k8s workload14:14
topol_#topic Huawei (Helen) NFV workload proposal.14:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Huawei (Helen) NFV workload proposal. (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"14:14
HelenYaoHi everyone14:15
topol_Hi HelenYao, Welcome!14:15
dmelladohey HelenYao welcome!14:15
HelenYaothx :)14:15
zhipengh_So I think everyone should already got the slide Helen prepared which I sent to the interop mailinglist14:15
topol_HelenYao tell us about your NFV Workload proposal14:15
HelenYaosure14:15
tongli@HelenYao, thanks for taking time joining this wg, I saw that you have added the flow to the etherpad, please take us through the steps.14:15
HelenYaoSample Workflow: Run vIMS on OpenStack with OPEN-O14:15
HelenYao1. Deploy 1 VM and install OPEN-O14:15
HelenYao2. Deploy 2 VM and install Juju (OpenStack should be able to support Juju)14:15
HelenYao3. Call the OPEN-O Rest API to upload the NSD and VNFD package(definition files for the network service and VNF)14:15
HelenYao4. Call the OPEN-O Rest API to deploy the Clearwater vIMS (1 VM)14:15
HelenYao5. Call the vIMS Rest API to configure Ellis (a specific call number is set for each OpenStack vendor)14:16
HelenYao6. Show the audience by dialing the specific call number14:16
HelenYaobasically, for the nfv, we can demo the call function14:16
HelenYaowhich is deployed by vIMS - a VNF service14:16
dmelladoI would be keen on not using Juju14:16
dmelladocan't we use another orchestrator?14:16
HelenYaodmellado: could u explain the reason?14:17
zhipengh_dmellado any reason why not juju ?14:17
HelenYaoopen-o is the orchestrator14:17
dmelladobecause basically, Juju is totally tied to Ubuntu14:17
HelenYaojuju is just used to deploy vIMS14:17
dmelladoand if we're going to show interop14:17
tongli@demllado, I think similar steps can be done using ansible, but let's not hang on the tools.14:17
dmelladoI'd rather use something that would be supported and available for *all* distributions14:17
tongliwe just need to figure out what need to be done here.14:17
HelenYaodmellado: yeah, u r making a good point14:18
zhipengh_agree tongli14:18
tongliwe need to figure out what needs to be done here, tools can be chosen later.14:18
topol_dmellado, so I had the same discussion with markbaker  yesterday.   He is willing to put some resources to show that juju will run everywhere.  I agree that needs to be proven14:18
topol_But they are willing to try14:18
dmelladowe can ellaborate more on that14:19
topol_The safest thing for us is to try and support some options here14:19
dmelladoI'd like to have a look if possible14:19
tongli@zhengming, step 3 and step 4, what are the details there?14:19
dmelladobut I don't think that, as of now14:19
HelenYaowe can define the main flow first and find tools to fit in14:19
dmelladoanother distributions wuold spend resources on juju, tbh14:19
tongliwhen you say call OPEN-O Rest API to upload NSD and VNFD package, what do they mean specifically?14:20
HelenYaofor step 3, to deploy a vnf, a topology is needed to define the network service, that is done by NSD and VNFD14:20
topol_so the safe thing to do is do have ansible which we  know works everywhere but let folks also try to see if juju will run everywhere14:20
HelenYaoit is basically tosca yaml14:20
topol_HelenYao, step 3 uses tosca yaml?14:21
zhipengh_yes14:21
HelenYaothe open-o is the orchestrator to deploy the service and juju is to managne all deployed vnfs14:21
HelenYaotopol_: yes14:21
* topol_ gold star for HelenYao! I started that project years ago :-)14:21
dmelladoheh, I need to check on open-o14:21
dmelladois it under openstack/ github's?14:22
zhipengh_#link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Opera+Project14:22
HelenYaotopol_: wow, u started tosca, brilliant14:22
zhipengh_open-o is an individual community14:22
luzCme too14:22
topol_HelenYao, actually the heat translator project, not TOSCA14:22
luzCI need to check it out too14:22
zhipengh_topol_ i worked with sahdev vert closely on that14:22
topol_gold star for zhipengh_ as well14:23
topol_:-)14:23
topol_very nice14:23
zhipengh_dmellado luzc please follow the link I provided14:23
zhipengh_opera is opnfv integration project for open-o14:23
zhipengh_it got all the information you need14:24
zhipengh_topol_ thx :)14:24
topol_HelenYao, zhipengh any more details you can provide?14:24
HelenYaoclearwater mentioned here is also an open source project for vIMS14:25
HelenYaowe can count on it to make a call14:25
topol_HelenYao so what is the specific network service that is started by all this orchestration?14:26
HelenYaoto make a call to a vIMS deployed by a openstack is good candidate for nfv demo14:26
zhipengh_topol_ IMS14:27
HelenYaothe orchetrator will deploy the all topology of vIMS14:27
dmelladothsnks zhipengh_ , I'll take a look14:27
tongliwhat is vIMS?14:27
topol_HelenYao, zhipengh please excuse my limited NFV background. what does IMS do?14:27
HelenYaohttp://www.projectclearwater.org/technical/clearwater-architecture/14:27
zhipengh_virtual IP Multimedia Subsystem14:27
topol_well thats sounds pretty impressive14:28
zhipengh_tongli it is a classic core network service14:28
dmelladoheh, then I guessed it right14:28
dmelladowas just wondering about the v14:28
topol_Im impressed14:28
zhipengh_topol_ you could dial calls via SIP based client, where IMS will handle the SIP protocal in the core network14:29
HelenYaov stands for virtualized version14:29
zhipengh_so basically it is a VoIP function14:29
zhipengh_something like that14:29
* topol_ I get all dazzled by worklaods that have multimedia in their name14:29
zhipengh_IMS was a hot topic ten years ago14:29
topol_zhipengh_, HelenYao,  here are my thoughts.14:30
dmelladotopol_: I always recall about those old pentium's MMX whenever I listen that word14:30
topol_This looks like an exciting workload and we really wanted an NFV workload.  I would love to see this submitted as a patch to the repository.14:31
dmellado+1 zhipengh_ HelenYao would you mind drafting this as a patch?14:31
dmelladoI was wondering if we should have blueprints14:31
dmelladoI'd really love to discuss those implementation details over something concrete and not on the irc14:31
zhipengh_topol_ for patch you mean just for the scripts or the actual vIMS and juju source code ?14:31
HelenYaowhat is expected in the patch? all the scripts to run whole workable flow14:32
topol_Now for reasons that will become clear later in the agenda,  we need to make sure everyone can run this. Hint Interop Challenge phase 2 Boston Summit, as requested by the foundation14:32
zhipengh_dmellado we could schedule ZOOm calls :P14:32
dmelladotopol_: tongli would it be reasonable to expect a blueprint?14:32
dmelladozhipengh_: ZOOm?14:32
zhipengh_ZOOM, the anti-gotomeeting-webex14:32
dmelladoheh xD14:32
topol_dmellado, we will need a blueprint/ some for of description. that will help everyone. I fine with it being submitted with the patch14:32
tongli@dmellado, a blueprint will be nice. so that we can comment and agree on by our wg members.14:33
dmelladothen can we add an action on zhipengh_ and HelenYao to submit a blueprint?14:33
HelenYaowhat is a blueprint? sorry, I am new here :-)14:33
tongliconsider other companies are also willing to contribute. that is one of the things china chapter has talked about last night.14:33
topol_Are folks wanting a blueprint to provide more description or because they want a more formal approval process?14:34
tongli@HelenYao, I can help with that. we can talk offline on that.14:34
topol_I do have one issue with this14:34
HelenYaotongli: neat14:34
dmelladotopol_: from my side, maybe more description and comments there14:34
zhipengh_tongli do we need to register the bp on the launchpad ?14:34
tongli@topol, I would like the blueprint just to clarify things and more description.14:34
dmelladoI'd like to have a deeper look at it after checking some stuff ;)14:34
topol_demellado that is what I am thinking.14:34
*** rarcea has joined #openstack-meeting-514:35
tongli@demellado, @topol_, I think we are going the same direction on the blueprint14:35
topol_My one issue is the juju needs to be optional and can replaced with ansible if for some reason juju will not run everywhere.14:35
dmellado+114:35
tonglimoving forward, we probably should have two workload implementations.14:35
zhipengh_topol_ we could look at alternatives, but ansible might not be the answer as well14:36
dmelladobut would it make sense to spend time on juju14:36
tongliif one is done, doing the other should be fairly easy14:36
dmelladoif in the end it won't be interoperable14:36
dmellado?14:36
HelenYaoI think openstack heat could be a replacement for juju14:36
rarceadmellado: +114:36
tongliwell, regardless which tool we use, the end results have to be the same.14:36
topol_So here is where my dream is where I want to be.   We show we have workloads that run on all clouds and we show we have more that one autoamtion tool (thnk ansible,juju) that work on all clouds14:36
tongliotherwise, we just defeated ourselves.14:36
topol_this desire originally mentioned by markvoelker way back when14:37
dmelladoI'd rather use heat/ansible14:37
rarceadmellado: +1 for heat14:37
dmelladomarkvoelker: around? any reason for the juju thing?14:37
zhipengh_heat + heat-translator could be the alternative14:37
topol_dmellado markvoelker wanted multiple tools not juju specifically14:37
markvoelkerI don't recall asking for Juju specifically.  I do recall saying we want to not be tied to any particular config management tool14:37
topol_markvoelker yes, I tried to captrue that acccurately14:38
dmelladotopol_: I understand that, but my concern is that if we don't narrow the scope in the end we won't ever end it ;)14:38
markvoelkerBasically: if we find problems with a particular tool in terms of it's ability to provision workloads on OpenStack clouds, shedding light on those is actually a good thing so they can be addressed14:38
HelenYaoeven chef, docker compose can be an option. We have all kinds of tools14:38
markvoelkerMy concern there is primarily on the OpenSTack side rather than than guest though.14:39
topol_dmellado, so I need to be risk averse here.   ideally we have a path that has a high level of confidence works everywhere14:39
dmelladotopol_: markvoelker I see your point14:39
dmelladobut then, I'd start with some tool that would work on every distro14:39
markvoelkerE.g. if ToolX can't provision VM's on 6/10 OpenStack clouds b/c it uses an archaic API version or something, that's a problem14:39
dmelladoand and a fallback14:39
tongliman , can we not talk about tools today, my head really hurts.14:39
HelenYaoone thing to mention, juju is a verified VNFM. it takes time to evaluate other tools as VNFM14:39
dmelladoi.e. heat/ansible14:40
topol_at the same time I need to let markbaker kick tires on juju to see if it will really run on lots of clouds like he claims14:40
dmelladobut if they submit the blueprint we can modify it14:40
dmelladoso I won't block the conversation here ;)14:40
markvoelkerIf the workloads requires you to boot a Fedora VM, I'm less concerned about it because most clouds will be able to boot VM's (regardless of whther it's Fedora or something else)14:40
dmelladowould this work for you too rarcea markvoelker ?14:40
topol_do the issues im trying to worry about/balance make sense?14:41
dmelladotopol_: yep, they would for me, just that I'd try to go for tools that would be available in most clouds14:41
markvoelkertopol_: Yes.  Again, I'm most concerned with the bits that touch OpenStack and less concerned with the contents of the workload itself.14:41
zhipengh_tongli where should we submit the BP ? have a new spec folder under the interop-workload repo ?14:42
*** chandankumar has left #openstack-meeting-514:43
topol_markvoelker, are you saying the juju is not scary cause int inside the workload?14:43
topol_err its inside the workload?14:43
tongliout project has a page for submit blueprint.14:43
tonglilet me find the link.14:43
tonglihttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/interop-workloads14:44
markvoelkertopol_: If it's being used to spin up infrastructure within OpenSTack and can do that across many OPenStack clouds, I'm fine with that.  If this particular workload requires that the guests be one OS or another, I'm even ok with that.14:44
tonglithat is our launchapd site, where we can file bugs, blueprints.14:44
zhipengh_got it thx tongli14:44
topol_in any case I think we need to get it submitted and folks can see if it runs in their clouds or not.14:45
tongli@topol_, sure, we should have a blueprint for this considering that people have quite different views of NFV.14:45
tongliconsolidate it a bit is a good thing.14:46
topol_if juju has issues markbaker promised to provide a rover to help other clouds.  But I  also like backup options..14:46
dmellado+1 on the blueprint14:46
*** elynn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-514:46
topol_so everyone okay with we move forward with the blueprint?14:46
topol_can the patch be submitted concurrently with the blueprint? Any concerns doing both?14:47
dmelladotopol_: well, I'd implement the patch after agreeing on the blueprint14:48
dmelladoboth of them can be sumitted at a time14:48
tongli@topol_, blueprint first please14:48
dmelladobut the patch should be modified along the requirements on the blueprint14:48
dmelladoIMHO14:48
topol_k, lets see a blueprint first14:48
tongliconsider the patch may take some time to complete14:48
gematongli: I get an error when I open that link14:49
gemaLAunchpad doesn't seem to know how interop challenge workloads tracks feature planning14:49
topol_tongli+++ I wasnt sure if the patch was close.  Blueprints are used to save the patch committer pain and misery of submitting something that then has the wrong design/architetcure14:49
tonglithe blueprint page?14:49
gemayep, you will have to go into the settings and tell it you want to use blueprints14:49
tongli@topol_, exactly, we should have the blueprint first.14:49
topol_#action HelenYao, zhipengh_,tongli to work together to get a blueprint submitted14:50
tongliI am sure other companies wanting to contribute to NFV might have some say to it. so let's have an agreement on the content first.14:50
topol_tongli+++14:50
dmelladoI can't say more ++ on it ;)14:50
topol_k so how will we do our blueprints,  we going to have a specs-folder and review blueprint in there like they are code?14:51
tonglihttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/interop-workloads @gema, you can not open it?14:51
zhipengh_topol_ what i asked earlier14:51
dmelladoI'd go for that, I guess it'd be easier than spawning a new repo14:52
tongli@topol_, we do blueprint on the launchpad page.14:52
zhipengh_tongli that is for registering14:52
topol_tongli yes but thats old school14:52
zhipengh_tongli the actual BP rst file needs to go somewhere14:52
topol_register there but reveiw comment in some form of repository14:52
zhipengh_yep14:52
topol_for example, #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/keystone-specs,n,z14:53
tonglihmmm, ok, I thought we create it there like create bugs.14:53
tonglihmmm. ok,14:53
topol_tongli, you register it there but then look at the contents of https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/keystone-specs,n,z14:53
topol_to keep life simple, should we just have a specs folder?14:54
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-514:54
topol_and not a spearate repo?14:54
dmelladotopol_: yep14:54
tongliso, we create a new folder in the project for blueprint14:54
dmellado+1 on the folder14:54
dmelladomaybe within docs14:54
dmelladoand I can tweak a patch for tox to generate the docs14:54
topol_dmellado, can you set up the specs folder for us?14:54
dmelladoyep, I'll put a patch for that, no worries14:55
tonglican we just create /bp at the root of the project folder?14:55
dmelladoI'll do that after the meeting14:55
topol_dmellado very nice, I love the autogenerate of docs14:55
topol_K, folks I only have 5 mins I need to move on14:55
topol_let me jump ahead14:55
topol_#topic PTG Meeting Agenda and Logistics:  Meeting Feb 21, Tuesday afternoon 1:30 - 5:00 RefStack room:14:56
topol_    Agenda and participant List:  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/interop-challenge-meeting-2017-01-1114:56
topol_    PTG Meeting will now include meeting with Mark Collier to discuss showcasing Interop Challenge Phase 2 in Boston14:56
*** openstack changes topic to "PTG Meeting Agenda and Logistics: Meeting Feb 21, Tuesday afternoon 1:30 - 5:00 RefStack room: (Meeting topic: interop_challenge)"14:56
topol_so good news but bad for my blodd pressure14:56
topol_Mark Collier will meet with us at PTG, the foundation wants to do something with InteropChallenge in Boston14:56
dmelladoheh, live demo again?14:57
topol_so yay more visibility. I thought we could stay under the radar but the bug stage is calling us again14:57
*** tiantian has joined #openstack-meeting-514:57
topol_dmellado, looking like something like that.  we can discuss at the PTG with Mark14:57
topol_but understand now I have to go back to making sure we deliver.14:58
*** nilles has joined #openstack-meeting-514:58
dmelladolet's discuss it there too14:58
topol_so I worry about things like juju vs ansible etc14:58
dmelladobut if that's the case we ought to try small milestones14:58
*** tianquan has quit IRC14:58
topol_dmellado agreed14:58
dmelladoand try to focus on small enhancements14:58
topol_need some MVPs14:58
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-514:59
topol_so lets see how we are with workload progress at the PTG14:59
dmelladosounds fine for me ;)14:59
topol_Im out of time, tongli if we have an update on chapter it needs to wait till next week14:59
gemao/15:00
topol_#action tongli to update on china chapter15:00
gemabye15:00
tonglithat is fine.15:00
zhipengh_one thing yall need to keep in mind is that NFV workload will run on NFV private clouds, that means for verified VNFM like Juju, chances are majority of the NFV private clouds should already support that15:00
topol_#endmeeting15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:00
openstackMeeting ended Wed Feb  8 15:00:25 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2017/interop_challenge.2017-02-08-14.01.html15:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2017/interop_challenge.2017-02-08-14.01.txt15:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2017/interop_challenge.2017-02-08-14.01.log.html15:00
*** therve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-515:00
ricolin#startmeeting heat15:01
openstackMeeting started Wed Feb  8 15:01:08 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ricolin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: heat)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'heat'15:01
ricolin#topic roll call15:01
*** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: heat)"15:01
ramishrahi15:01
therve_Hey15:01
tiantianhi15:01
*** cwolferh has joined #openstack-meeting-515:02
cwolferho/15:02
elynn_hi15:02
nilleshi15:02
*** zhipengh_ has quit IRC15:02
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting-515:03
zanebhola15:03
ricolin#topic adding items to agenda15:03
ricolin#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282017-02-08_1500_UTC.2915:03
*** openstack changes topic to "adding items to agenda (Meeting topic: heat)"15:03
ricolinBTW our meeting now change to Wednesday 1500 on openstack-meeting-5 weekly :)15:05
zanebricolin: so it's always in this channel now?15:05
ricolinyes15:05
* zaneb leaves #openstack-meeting-415:05
ricolinlol15:05
ricolin#topic Docs liaison15:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Docs liaison (Meeting topic: heat)"15:06
ramishraso we retruned slots for busy meeting rooms:)15:06
ricolinWe need a Docs liaison15:07
*** daniela_ebert has quit IRC15:07
ricolinRandle signed off that duty15:07
ricolin#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons#Documentation15:08
ricolinAny one would like to take over?15:08
ricolinI suppose it will not be too much works to do15:08
zanebI have my hands full failing at being the stable-branch liason ;)15:09
therve_I'm good too :)15:09
ricolinzaneb: Keep it full!!15:09
ramishraDon't know what's the expectation from the docs team. Seems no one is volunteering...15:11
ramishraricolin: ok, I'll try do it15:12
zanebdo we actually have any docs that are maintained outside of our local repo any more?15:12
ricolinramishra: sold!15:12
ricolinzaneb: I think not15:12
ricolinramishra: Thanks!15:13
ricolinok15:13
ricolinmove on15:13
ricolin#topic PTG Schedule discuss15:13
*** openstack changes topic to "PTG Schedule discuss (Meeting topic: heat)"15:13
ricolin#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-pike-ptg-sessions15:13
ramishraricolin: Is there a specific etherpad for cross-project topics?15:13
ricolinramishra: appears we have to orginize the cross project ourself15:14
ramishraHave not seen one. Wanted to add the keystone federation releated topic15:14
ricolinI do put some idea below15:14
ricolinthinking maybe one with  Mistral, zaqar, TripleO?15:15
ricolinfor Mistral + heat case?15:15
ramishraWe need the keystone guys15:15
ricolinramishra: Okey, let's put that in, and I will help to get keystone team to discuss that session:)15:16
*** tongli has quit IRC15:16
ramishraricolin: ok15:16
ricolinAnd how about Mistral + heat case?15:17
ricolinanyone would like it?15:18
zanebsure, but I'm not clear on exactly what the topic would be15:20
ricolinI actually get that idea from a TripleO session15:20
ricolintherve_: you're the one to work on it right?15:20
zaneba discussion about the "How to run mistral workflows via templates" thread might be helpful15:21
ricolinAlso I would like to put a session for cross project feedback from other teams who use heat?15:21
therve_ricolin, The workflow execution one?15:21
ricolintherve_: yes15:21
therve_I'm helping yeah. There is a tripleo session, maybe we can join it15:21
ricolinzaneb: agree:)15:21
*** fengxia41103 has joined #openstack-meeting-515:22
ricolintherve_: yeah, it might be a session for TripleO+ heat+mistral+zaqar right:)?15:22
therve_No zaqar no15:22
ricolintherve_: fine!15:23
ricolinAnd how about a feedback session from other teams who use heat?15:23
ricolinMagnum, sahara, TripleO, etc.15:23
zanebricolin: +1. we made some performance improvements in Ocata for big stacks and it would be good to hear about how much it did/didn't help15:24
zaneb+ we have more plans to Pike to tell them about15:24
ricolinzaneb: great idea:)15:25
*** gema has left #openstack-meeting-515:25
ricolinI assume we will do all topic from the etherpad15:26
ricolinbut not sure how we do Property Translation with out peter15:26
zanebis it confirmed that Peter is not coming, or is it just that nobody has filled in the attendee list?15:27
ricolinright! Can guys please put you name in attendee list :)15:28
ricolin#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-pike-ptg-sessions15:28
ricolinit will help us to make sure who will be there15:28
ricolinWill anyone going to host 'Property Translation' session in PTG?15:30
fengxia41103Hi.. this is my first time here.. just want to sit in and learn about this project :)15:30
ricolinfengxia41103: happy to have you here:)15:31
fengxia41103thank you ricolin :)15:31
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting-515:31
ramishraricolin: Peter is right person to host that session unless he is not joining us at PTG15:32
ricolinramishra: yeah, but seems Peter will not be there:(15:33
ramishraricolin: he has number of patches up for review for that, may be he can join virtually or something like that.15:34
ricolinOkey, we sure can have that session15:34
ricolinand one more thing for PTG, Time schedule15:35
ricolinI'd put a daft time schedule in the end of Etherpad15:36
ricolinAny idea on that?15:36
ricolinAnd of curse There will be beer sessions:)15:37
fengxia41103hooray...15:38
ricolinOkey, than will send the schedule out once we confirm with other teams on cross project15:40
ricolinFeel free to give any suggestion15:40
ricolin#topic Open discussion15:41
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: heat)"15:41
ricolinAny other topic?:)15:41
ramishrabtw, if you've not noticed, we have moved all dsvm jobs to use apache by default and added a voting non-apache job15:43
ricolinramishra: it seems works fine on gate15:45
ramishraricolin: yes15:46
ricolinOkey, any other discuss?15:47
ramishrashould we skip test_create_stack_with_multi_signal_waitcondition? it seems to be failing more often than not.15:47
ramishramost of the job failures are becuase of it.15:47
ramishrawe don't seem to have a solution for it yet15:48
ricolinramishra: IIRC we adjust the timeout for it15:48
ricolinramishra: seems not help much?15:48
ramishraIt's the ConcurrentTransaction error when setting metadata15:49
ramishratherve_, zaneb ?15:49
zanebwe need to fix that one so badly15:49
ricolinmaybe skip for now?15:50
ramishrawe can keep it, but 9/10 failures are becuase of it and it seems to be somewhat only happening for non-convergence15:51
zanebhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/321783/ should help, but it just makes it worse in convergence15:53
ramishraWe know that issue and unless we fix it soon, we should think about disabling it15:53
ricolinIs there anyone volunteer to track on this issue?15:55
ricolinI will track on it, and if we can't fix it soon (not even in PTG) maybe we should disable it first15:57
ricolinOkey, anything else?:)15:58
ricolinThan thanks you all to attend, hope you all have a good day!15:59
ricolin#endmeeting15:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:59
openstackMeeting ended Wed Feb  8 15:59:33 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2017/heat.2017-02-08-15.01.html15:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2017/heat.2017-02-08-15.01.txt15:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2017/heat.2017-02-08-15.01.log.html15:59
fengxia41103thank you ricolin15:59
*** fengxia41103 has quit IRC16:00
*** nilles has left #openstack-meeting-516:00
*** therve_ has left #openstack-meeting-516:03
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-516:04
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:15
*** ricolin has quit IRC16:50
*** topol_ is now known as topol17:33
*** rarcea has quit IRC17:52
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-517:56
*** tianquan has quit IRC18:00
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC18:02
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC18:35
*** hogepodge has quit IRC18:45
*** uli-k has quit IRC18:45
*** elynn_ has quit IRC19:04
*** rarcea has joined #openstack-meeting-519:22
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-519:36
*** uli-k has joined #openstack-meeting-519:43
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-520:07
*** tianquan has quit IRC20:13
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-520:19
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-520:28
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-521:19
*** matrohon has quit IRC21:22
*** tianquan has quit IRC21:44
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-521:50
*** tianquan has quit IRC21:54
*** tianquan has joined #openstack-meeting-523:51
*** rarcea has quit IRC23:55
*** tianquan has quit IRC23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!