*** jcru has quit IRC | 00:02 | |
*** kagan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 00:27 | |
*** kagan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 00:29 | |
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul | 00:29 | |
*** kagan has quit IRC | 00:32 | |
*** kagan_ is now known as kagan | 00:32 | |
*** grapex has quit IRC | 00:54 | |
*** jrodom has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away | 02:00 | |
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul | 02:05 | |
*** ChadL has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 02:37 | |
*** kagan has quit IRC | 02:42 | |
*** sacharya has quit IRC | 03:56 | |
*** kagan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 04:55 | |
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away | 05:59 | |
*** kagan has quit IRC | 07:23 | |
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul | 08:03 | |
*** dhellmann-afk is now known as dhellmann | 13:17 | |
*** grapex has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:34 | |
*** imsplitbit has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:54 | |
*** djohnstone has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:15 | |
*** jcru has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:17 | |
*** amyt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:30 | |
*** amyt has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
*** amyt_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:32 | |
*** amyt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:33 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 15:44 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 15:44 | |
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:44 | |
*** jcru is now known as jcru|away | 15:45 | |
*** rnirmal_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:46 | |
*** rnirmal has quit IRC | 15:49 | |
*** jcru|away is now known as jcru | 15:51 | |
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:11 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 16:13 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 16:13 | |
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:14 | |
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:19 | |
*** joe5081 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:35 | |
*** joe5081 has quit IRC | 16:35 | |
*** joe5081 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:37 | |
*** jcru has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
*** joe5081 has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
*** djohnstone1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:02 | |
*** djohnstone1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:03 | |
*** imsplitbit has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
*** djohnstone has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
*** grapex has quit IRC | 17:07 | |
*** grapex has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:08 | |
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:59 | |
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 18:00 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 18:04 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 18:04 | |
*** kagan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 18:09 | |
*** esp1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 18:11 | |
*** esp1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 18:12 | |
*** esp1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 18:34 | |
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann-afk | 18:55 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 18:57 | |
*** jcru has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 19:02 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 19:02 | |
*** imsplitbit has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 19:14 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 19:17 | |
*** esp1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 19:19 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 19:19 | |
*** imsplitbit has quit IRC | 19:21 | |
*** imsplitbit has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 19:26 | |
*** amyt has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
*** rnirmal has quit IRC | 20:11 | |
*** dhellmann-afk is now known as dhellmann | 20:16 | |
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away | 20:16 | |
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul | 20:16 | |
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 20:33 | |
*** rnirmal has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
*** vipul is now known as vipul|away | 20:52 | |
*** vipul|away is now known as vipul | 20:56 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 20:57 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 20:58 | |
*** bcwaldon has quit IRC | 20:59 | |
*** grapex has quit IRC | 21:20 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 21:25 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 21:25 | |
*** jcru is now known as jcru|away | 21:33 | |
*** jcru|away is now known as jcru | 21:36 | |
*** hub_cap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:38 | |
*** grapex has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:43 | |
imsplitbit | bam | 21:48 |
---|---|---|
imsplitbit | ha, hub_cap hai | 21:48 |
*** grapex has quit IRC | 21:52 | |
*** grapex has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:52 | |
*** datsun180b has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:56 | |
hub_cap | hai | 21:57 |
cp16net | hi | 21:57 |
*** heckj has quit IRC | 21:58 | |
datsun180b | hello | 21:58 |
djohnstone1 | hi | 21:58 |
*** djohnstone1 is now known as djohnstone | 21:58 | |
grapex | Salutations | 21:58 |
*** esp1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:59 | |
hub_cap | #startmeeting reddwarf | 21:59 |
openstack | Meeting started Tue Mar 5 21:59:53 2013 UTC. The chair is hub_cap. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 21:59 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 21:59 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: reddwarf)" | 21:59 | |
hub_cap | come one come all | 21:59 |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'reddwarf' | 21:59 |
esp1 | hello | 22:00 |
*** SlickNik has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:00 | |
hub_cap | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/RedDwarfMeeting | 22:00 |
hub_cap | #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/reddwarf/2013/reddwarf.2013-02-26-21.59.html | 22:01 |
*** dkehn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:01 | |
SlickNik | woot | 22:01 |
* hub_cap starts a timer for 60s | 22:02 | |
SlickNik | Give people a minute or so to show up? | 22:02 |
SlickNik | sounds good. | 22:02 |
hub_cap | :) | 22:02 |
hub_cap | import time | 22:03 |
vipul | here | 22:03 |
vipul | sorry late | 22:03 |
hub_cap | np we havent started yet | 22:03 |
SlickNik | no problem, still waiting maybe 15 seconds. | 22:03 |
steveleon | hello | 22:03 |
hub_cap | timers done | 22:04 |
hub_cap | vipul: yer up w/ the update snapshots wiki | 22:04 |
vipul | crap, nope.. was going to do it today but stuck in meetings | 22:04 |
hub_cap | lol so did we | 22:04 |
hub_cap | its been meeting hell today | 22:05 |
vipul | #action vipul to update snapshot wiki w/snapshots deleted in swift | 22:05 |
hub_cap | SlickNik: secgroups extension | 22:05 |
SlickNik | Still working on it. | 22:05 |
*** steveleon is now known as esmute | 22:05 | |
SlickNik | Got the object model done, working on the controllers. | 22:05 |
hub_cap | cool. had a chance to do any work w/ the API? | 22:05 |
hub_cap | as in the api docs | 22:05 |
hub_cap | (im covering your other action item) | 22:06 |
SlickNik | Yes, I've uploaded a review to gerrit. | 22:06 |
hub_cap | OH NOEZ | 22:06 |
hub_cap | #topic action items | 22:06 |
*** openstack changes topic to "action items (Meeting topic: reddwarf)" | 22:06 | |
SlickNik | whoops. | 22:06 |
SlickNik | lol | 22:06 |
kagan | btw, quick Q, when is the time to discuss out of band issues ? | 22:06 |
hub_cap | kagan: the end of meeting durin open discussion | 22:06 |
kagan | ok | 22:06 |
SlickNik | usually at the end of the meeting, kagan. | 22:06 |
SlickNik | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/23618/ | 22:06 |
hub_cap | everyone go in and update thier watchd projects!! | 22:06 |
datsun180b | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:watched+status:open,n,z | 22:07 |
esp1 | datsun180b: thx! | 22:07 |
SlickNik | I've marked that as work in progress since I still need to put in the request-response snippets. | 22:07 |
hub_cap | datsun180b: assuming database-api is in your watched projects list ;) | 22:07 |
hub_cap | SlickNik: kk | 22:07 |
datsun180b | configuration detail | 22:07 |
SlickNik | But info on the entities/API calls are up there already. | 22:07 |
hub_cap | still nice to see whats going on | 22:07 |
datsun180b | it also assumes you're logged in | 22:07 |
hub_cap | lol datsun180b | 22:08 |
hub_cap | SlickNik: one thing to note, plz make the lines < 80 char | 22:08 |
hub_cap | check out the begin (lines 4~7) | 22:08 |
hub_cap | vs line 475 | 22:08 |
SlickNik | Ah, okay will snip em... | 22:08 |
hub_cap | <3 | 22:08 |
hub_cap | great work | 22:08 |
SlickNik | np. | 22:09 |
vipul | who was going to add snapshots api there/ | 22:09 |
hub_cap | so vipul kagan, i barely touched base w/ u wrt the group stuff in reddwarf + percona | 22:09 |
kagan | what does that has to do with percona ? | 22:09 |
hub_cap | is someone working on that vipul? the snaps feature? | 22:09 |
SlickNik | #action SlickNik still working on Security-Groups. Hope to have patch up for review by beginning next week. | 22:09 |
vipul | #action vipul to update api-specs wiht Snapshot API | 22:10 |
hub_cap | as per last wk kagan | 22:10 |
hub_cap | vipul hub_cap and kagan to look into making the service_type code work properly w/ percona image | 22:10 |
juice | hub_cap: kmansel and I are working on some prep stuff but I don't know how has the meat of the work | 22:10 |
vipul | hub_cap: i think we covered that? | 22:10 |
hub_cap | cool. looks like vipul is gonna take a stab at the api juice | 22:10 |
vipul | the percoan service type piece | 22:10 |
hub_cap | we covered it, id like to get a finalization for the group | 22:11 |
kagan | if i understand you guys correctly, i think i've done that already | 22:11 |
hub_cap | im not saying u havent | 22:11 |
hub_cap | jsut want to cover the action item from last wk :) | 22:11 |
vipul | So kagan added code to support 'percoan' and 'mysql' as types in the API request, defaulting to 'mysql' | 22:11 |
vipul | this is a conf value in reddwarf.conf | 22:11 |
hub_cap | perfect vipul thx! | 22:11 |
hub_cap | was it a ton of work? | 22:11 |
vipul | when the image is updated by redstack, it's added to service_images as percona or mysql | 22:11 |
* hub_cap hopes it was not a lot of work | 22:12 | |
vipul | only kagan would know :) | 22:12 |
kagan | no it wasn't | 22:12 |
hub_cap | sweet | 22:12 |
hub_cap | cp16net: go home | 22:12 |
hub_cap | did u do that last wk? | 22:12 |
SlickNik | I sure hope so :) | 22:12 |
cp16net | yup | 22:13 |
cp16net | i'm at home now | 22:13 |
cp16net | success! | 22:13 |
hub_cap | perfect!! | 22:13 |
hub_cap | ok done w/ teh action items | 22:13 |
esp1 | I wish I was home | 22:13 |
hub_cap | #topic Quotas / Limits Updates | 22:14 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Quotas / Limits Updates (Meeting topic: reddwarf)" | 22:14 | |
esp1 | lookes like Quotas got merged :) | 22:14 |
grapex | Limits looks good to me | 22:14 |
datsun180b | sounds done to me | 22:14 |
hub_cap | yuuuuup | 22:14 |
SlickNik | hellz yea! | 22:14 |
grapex | Only question I have is mockito | 22:15 |
vipul | woohoo | 22:15 |
esp1 | I've started planning out the next few steps to bring quota's into the API call and update the python reddwarf cli | 22:15 |
hub_cap | grapex: thas not a question :) | 22:15 |
esp1 | grapex: good eye :) | 22:15 |
grapex | I'm ok with us adding that, but won't it not tie into the standards or something? | 22:15 |
hub_cap | yet another mocking lib? | 22:16 |
grapex | I thought the powers that be were wanting us to use mock | 22:16 |
esp1 | I will let juice speak to it. | 22:16 |
*** sacharya1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:16 | |
hub_cap | juice: speak to it | 22:16 |
juice | it's well worth it | 22:16 |
esp1 | I have idea | 22:16 |
grapex | Ok. I'm going to +2 it anyway, just wanted to hear the reasoning. :) | 22:16 |
juice | I have struggled with the mocking libraries | 22:16 |
juice | used this extensively in java | 22:16 |
juice | works wonders in both languagues | 22:16 |
esp1 | I mean I have no idea. but it does look cool | 22:16 |
juice | the best part is that it is easy to use | 22:16 |
juice | and you can actually make sense of the test code | 22:17 |
juice | …most of the times anyways :) | 22:17 |
grapex | Another tangent | 22:17 |
grapex | "@test(enabled=RD_CLIENT_OK)" | 22:17 |
grapex | That's kind of cool | 22:17 |
grapex | I was wondering if we could build the version number into the client | 22:17 |
grapex | so those tests would get enabled automatically | 22:17 |
esp1 | well at first that was the plan | 22:18 |
esp1 | but I think I will just remove it once reddwarf cli merges. | 22:18 |
grapex | Another idea is we could invent a decorator that would check the client version, and run SkipTest if the client wasn't up to date. The reason is, skips end up being far more visible than disabling tests. | 22:18 |
grapex | Ok | 22:18 |
*** sacharya has quit IRC | 22:18 | |
datsun180b | Well just having the client version would be great, I don't want to have to look at pip freezes after tests fail | 22:18 |
grapex | If no one objects, I'll create a blueprint for that. | 22:18 |
esp1 | I thought about that too. I think that would be a good idea. | 22:18 |
esp1 | +1 | 22:19 |
grapex | Cool | 22:19 |
SlickNik | I'm in favor of creating a blueprint for that, think it would be useful. | 22:19 |
hub_cap | +1 to the BP, action item it grapex | 22:20 |
grapex | Cool, I'm on it | 22:20 |
hub_cap | i mean actually type it in the channel grapex!! | 22:21 |
grapex | Was going to do a client BP, doing a reddwarf one instead | 22:22 |
grapex | We may be able to find a way to do this that doesn't involve changing the client. Let's talk about it after the meeting. | 22:22 |
hub_cap | grapex: !!! | 22:23 |
hub_cap | #action teach grapex to use #action | 22:23 |
grapex | #action make a RD blueprint to enable tests depending on RD client version | 22:23 |
hub_cap | :) | 22:23 |
grapex | lol... sorry hub_cap! | 22:23 |
hub_cap | haha that was hilarious | 22:23 |
SlickNik | :) | 22:23 |
hub_cap | ok we good on quotas/limits? im STOKED they are in/merging | 22:23 |
vipul | good job guys | 22:24 |
hub_cap | WOOOOOOT!! Big +1 to the HP guys | 22:24 |
hub_cap | #topic Percona Image Updates | 22:24 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Percona Image Updates (Meeting topic: reddwarf)" | 22:24 | |
kagan | i've posted another version today | 22:25 |
kagan | i think it should be good | 22:25 |
grapex | Yeah, that code is looking really good. | 22:25 |
kagan | need you guys to take a look | 22:25 |
grapex | Thanks guys | 22:25 |
grapex | kagan: I'm sorry I've been unable to look at that code yet, I've been in a lot of meetings this week | 22:25 |
grapex | I'll try to catch up soon. | 22:25 |
kagan | i've added the package name as a config with default to mysql | 22:25 |
kagan | sure | 22:25 |
hub_cap | sweet! we will be looking @ it today/tomorrow kagan for sure | 22:25 |
kagan | so, one thing still missing: | 22:26 |
hub_cap | i like that kagan! (the config / pkg default) | 22:26 |
kagan | if the image is clean, i.e. no mysql installed | 22:26 |
kagan | then percona will not be installed | 22:26 |
kagan | we still don't support that | 22:26 |
kagan | it shouldn't break, since the only time the pkg name is set to percona's is when you actually build a percona image | 22:27 |
kagan | i think we need to discuss whether we even want to support such a use case, and if so, find a decent way to handle it. | 22:27 |
hub_cap | Ahh so yer saying the image _has_ to be seeded w/ percona mysql to test percona mysql | 22:27 |
kagan | installing percona has some more steps to it. | 22:27 |
hub_cap | if its no mysql, itll fail for percona | 22:27 |
hub_cap | that makes sense | 22:27 |
kagan | well, it won't fail, cause it won't think it's percona ... | 22:27 |
hub_cap | ah okey | 22:27 |
hub_cap | itll just install stock mysql | 22:28 |
kagan | it's set to look for percona pkg only at time of building a percona image | 22:28 |
kagan | right | 22:28 |
hub_cap | that makes sense | 22:28 |
kagan | if provided with a clean image. | 22:28 |
vipul | we could support it, but probbly need ot refactor that install code a bit | 22:28 |
hub_cap | ok, well if yall want to add that to the guest it would make sense... | 22:28 |
kagan | so, we ended up dropping a lot of what i initially put it to make the tests work | 22:28 |
hub_cap | but if not, putting in image def works :) | 22:28 |
kagan | i think we have a pretty solid version checked in now. | 22:28 |
hub_cap | w00t | 22:28 |
kagan | any questions? | 22:29 |
SlickNik | I think in the future, we may want to do something like install percona (like mysql), but for now this seems like a good plan… | 22:29 |
hub_cap | kagan: safe to assume uve run it w/ stock mysql recently? ill pull it down tomorrow and run it w/ stock too | 22:29 |
kagan | yes, i did | 22:29 |
hub_cap | sweet | 22:29 |
kagan | just had some issues this morning with tox | 22:29 |
kagan | would pass on my machine, but failed jenkins ... | 22:29 |
kagan | indeed there were errors, funny fox didn't find it ... | 22:30 |
kagan | now all should be good, as far as i can tell ... | 22:30 |
kagan | if you wanna test it, make sure you also pull latest changes to reddwarf-integration | 22:30 |
kagan | or have they merged already ... | 22:30 |
hub_cap | okey thx kagan | 22:30 |
kagan | sure | 22:31 |
hub_cap | now our PM's will be asking when we are going to put maria in | 22:31 |
hub_cap | :P | 22:31 |
kagan | it's easy, 3 days tops …. :) | 22:31 |
imsplitbit | hub_cap, they already are | 22:31 |
vipul | heh | 22:31 |
SlickNik | Why wait for the PM's? | 22:31 |
grapex | Nice. | 22:31 |
hub_cap | hahahahaha | 22:31 |
SlickNik | hub_cap, when are we going to put Maria in? :P | 22:31 |
SlickNik | j/k | 22:32 |
vipul | who's maria | 22:32 |
esp1 | uhm, kagan is going on vacation for like 1 month.. | 22:32 |
hub_cap | i think vipul told me SlickNik was going to do it | 22:32 |
vipul | :D | 22:32 |
hub_cap | vipul: lol | 22:32 |
SlickNik | lol. | 22:32 |
hub_cap | woah kagan when? | 22:32 |
imsplitbit | vipul, it's hub_cap's gf | 22:32 |
*** kmansel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:32 | |
vipul | heh | 22:32 |
kagan | in 2 weeks. | 22:32 |
hub_cap | lets get his code reviewed/merged quick | 22:32 |
hub_cap | ok we should have more than enough time :) | 22:32 |
kagan | i'll try to be working most of the time. going to Israel, so 10 hours ahead .. | 22:32 |
kagan | \ | 22:32 |
hub_cap | cool! | 22:32 |
kagan | and little overlap with all the weekend shift .... | 22:32 |
kagan | gonna be tricky | 22:33 |
datsun180b | 10 hours ahead of seattle? | 22:33 |
kagan | yep | 22:33 |
hub_cap | vipul: do we need to cover snapshots? they are still on the agenda | 22:33 |
kagan | it's easier to take two hours back and flip :) | 22:33 |
vipul | No, not really, besides we're started work on it | 22:33 |
grapex | Hey that's only a mere 8 hours ahead of us. | 22:33 |
datsun180b | exactly | 22:33 |
hub_cap | any progress to be chatted about vipul? | 22:33 |
vipul | we're enabling Swift and bringing in swiftclient in reddwarf | 22:33 |
hub_cap | ahh cool | 22:33 |
hub_cap | integration work first | 22:34 |
juice | kevin has the swift client enabled by default. | 22:34 |
SlickNik | juice and kmansel working on that… (swift / swiftclient) | 22:34 |
vipul | well some of that is kinda necessary | 22:34 |
hub_cap | imma change the meeting to say Snapshots Update | 22:34 |
hub_cap | def vipul | 22:34 |
juice | I am writing the wrapper code to get the client and looking into a way of getting away from Fakes | 22:34 |
hub_cap | it was blueprint feedback.... | 22:34 |
juice | for use with testing with Swift in a non-integrated env | 22:34 |
kmansel | yeah i'm working on that integration with redstack | 22:34 |
juice | should have something to commit by tmw | 22:34 |
hub_cap | sweet! | 22:35 |
vipul | cool, annashen is also looking at the models piece | 22:35 |
vipul | going to submitting the migration soon i believe | 22:35 |
grapex | juice: Do you mean you're changing the test doubles to some other kind of test double, or that you're going to try to call a real instance of swift? | 22:35 |
juice | i was thinking of not using a test double but instead of using mocks | 22:36 |
juice | I certainly do not think we should have Fake code in the production code a la Client | 22:36 |
grapex | For the integration tests? | 22:37 |
vipul | wasn't there a bug for that issue? | 22:37 |
juice | sure | 22:37 |
vipul | tha we mix fakes with real clients | 22:37 |
hub_cap | for removing fakemode? | 22:37 |
vipul | I think juice is referring to the 'remotes.py' | 22:37 |
juice | grapes - is there a reason not to use mocks in fake mode? | 22:38 |
grapex | No, it would make sense in some cases. | 22:38 |
hub_cap | lol grapes | 22:38 |
juice | :) I just caught that | 22:38 |
grapex | The only exception is if you stand up Reddwarf by itself to run in fake mode with eventlet turned on | 22:38 |
hub_cap | id prefer to see a way to make fakemode configuration driven, just fyi | 22:38 |
grapex | It would just be hard to get the mocks to behave persistently | 22:38 |
juice | Yes, I would not suggest using mocks to keep track of state | 22:39 |
grapex | So the only reason is it would be hard. :) If you can find a way to do it where fake mode can still chug along then that's great | 22:39 |
juice | that's where the fakes would be a better choice | 22:39 |
grapex | Possibly having two configurations could help as well, or just using mocks from the unit tests. | 22:39 |
juice | I am just getting into it so this is somewhat speculative | 22:40 |
grapex | I think the "fakes" are best when you're writing integration tests for the happy path, and any unhappy paths that are liable to be hit frequently | 22:40 |
hub_cap | like looking for a oil well juice? | 22:40 |
grapex | It's easier to hit the edge cases with unit tests and mocks | 22:40 |
grapex | but if you can find a way around it feel free, as long we as we don't lose functionality it could be really cool. | 22:41 |
juice | I will post findings in the regular channel over the next day or two | 22:41 |
hub_cap | cool | 22:42 |
juice | I really just want to provide some light weight tools developers can get in there to change code and test their changes. So that is the goal. As a newcomer to the code base I don't feel like it's there yet | 22:42 |
hub_cap | so do we really have a CI update? i konw datsun180b had some issues w/ CI due to the reddwarf->database change. | 22:43 |
hub_cap | #topic Redwarf CI Update | 22:43 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Redwarf CI Update (Meeting topic: reddwarf)" | 22:43 | |
hub_cap | datsun180b: care to elaborate? | 22:43 |
datsun180b | I think I've resolved everything I can within SF | 22:43 |
vipul | stackforge? | 22:43 |
datsun180b | aye | 22:43 |
datsun180b | so as far as i can tell for now we're okay | 22:43 |
datsun180b | well, there's a couple things that i put in my modify-user fix requests | 22:44 |
datsun180b | at this point i think it's better that i just submit that on its own | 22:44 |
vipul | CI update is that we are working on a solution with our own Jenkins that will listen to Gerrit ... the idea is that we run the VM-gate here .. Rax could do the same fi we need ot have multiple set ups | 22:44 |
grapex | vipul: So ultimately, either HP or Rax will run Jenkins and not StackForge? | 22:45 |
vipul | grapex: For the time being, yes | 22:45 |
vipul | the concernt openstack-ci has is that they can't support all stackforge projects since vm-gate is a pretty heavy thing | 22:45 |
vipul | and htey have no way to set priorities on projects | 22:45 |
datsun180b | did you try to tell them that we're #1? | 22:45 |
vipul | until they get multi-master jenkins setup in openstack CI | 22:46 |
vipul | we're gong to set up our own.. | 22:46 |
vipul | when they get it set up, i beleive we'll be 'officially supported' again | 22:46 |
hub_cap | vipul: is yours open? | 22:46 |
grapex | Ok. As long as we just have it running | 22:46 |
SlickNik | yes, Openstack CI is having issues with the load on their Jenkins master, so they don't want to take on integration testing for stackforge projects... | 22:46 |
hub_cap | as in will we be able to hit it? | 22:46 |
vipul | hub_cap: No, that's what we're trying to figure out | 22:46 |
grapex | Makes sense. | 22:46 |
vipul | how to get you guys access | 22:46 |
hub_cap | kk vipul | 22:46 |
vipul | worst case, ew'll push logs up? | 22:46 |
hub_cap | we could probably spin up a cloud server... | 22:46 |
hub_cap | we have the power | 22:47 |
vipul | we're having trouble with the gerrit hook at this point | 22:47 |
vipul | so this may/may not go anywhere.. and a Plan C may need to be developed | 22:47 |
hub_cap | ya i think gerrit needs to push to the jenkins infra right? | 22:47 |
grapex | Worst case scenario | 22:47 |
grapex | we just run it periodically without listening to hooks | 22:47 |
hub_cap | ok if we need to pop a cloud server | 22:47 |
hub_cap | we can do that | 22:47 |
SlickNik | hub_cap it's a pull model... | 22:47 |
vipul | Yea, honor system? | 22:47 |
grapex | At least then we'd see it and could be aware when it broke | 22:47 |
hub_cap | vipul: BOOOOOOOO | 22:47 |
vipul | yea don't like it either | 22:48 |
hub_cap | SlickNik: k | 22:48 |
SlickNik | in openstack_ci zuul monitors the gerrit stream and triggers jenkins... | 22:48 |
hub_cap | right so gerrit needs to be able to talk to jenkins | 22:48 |
SlickNik | gerrit event stream* | 22:48 |
hub_cap | that what i was gettin at | 22:48 |
hub_cap | if jenkins is private.... | 22:48 |
hub_cap | then gerrit no knowie | 22:48 |
vipul | so HP or Rax jenkins can be given voting privileges | 22:48 |
*** yidclare has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:48 | |
grapex | Yeah, it needs to be on a public Nova server. | 22:48 |
vipul | that's already something they support.. you might be right, not behind VPN | 22:49 |
hub_cap | maybe we should put it in the public and use openid/launchpad integration for ssh/jenkins access | 22:49 |
vipul | #link http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#the-jenkins-gerrit-trigger-plugin-way | 22:49 |
hub_cap | vipul: im pretty sure it wont work unless u punch a hole in yer firewall | 22:49 |
hub_cap | which im _sure_ your netsec guys are totally cool with | 22:49 |
vipul | well don't tell anyone but we have a jenkins in nova today :D | 22:50 |
hub_cap | so why dont we spin up a cloud servers jenkins? | 22:50 |
hub_cap | oh ic so it _is_ public? | 22:50 |
hub_cap | and i wont tell anynoe whos not in the room or has ears vipul | 22:50 |
vipul | sort of.. ports are blocked | 22:50 |
hub_cap | promise | 22:50 |
vipul | securiryt gorup rules | 22:50 |
hub_cap | ah ic | 22:50 |
vipul | ugh | 22:50 |
hub_cap | ok lets table this i think. we can come up w/ a solution | 22:51 |
vipul | anyway, so still some work to be done before we have that.. but look at the link ^^ | 22:51 |
hub_cap | and it sounds like yer already workin on it | 22:51 |
vipul | if you guys want to try to set something up on your end | 22:51 |
esp1 | hub_cap: who do you know that doesn't have ears? I know a dude who's missing a thumb. | 22:51 |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 22:52 | |
hub_cap | whales? | 22:52 |
hub_cap | lets go w/ visible ears esp1 | 22:52 |
hub_cap | #topic Open Discussion | 22:52 |
esp1 | sorry for the interruption... | 22:52 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: reddwarf)" | 22:52 | |
kagan | now time for issues? | 22:52 |
kagan | i have 2 of those ... | 22:53 |
datsun180b | issues you say | 22:53 |
hub_cap | yar | 22:53 |
SlickNik | yes kagan. | 22:53 |
SlickNik | go for it. | 22:53 |
kagan | first one, code style/pep8 | 22:53 |
kagan | is there a tool we use for that? | 22:53 |
grapex | tox -epep8 | 22:53 |
datsun180b | yes, the tool is called pep8 | 22:53 |
kagan | that's to check | 22:53 |
esp1 | yeah that's what I run too.. | 22:53 |
grapex | You mean from an IDE? | 22:53 |
kagan | i mean to apply it ... | 22:53 |
vipul | automagically fix? | 22:53 |
esp1 | IDE is okay.. but seems slow (PyCharm) | 22:53 |
kagan | so, for eclips/pydev there is some thing | 22:54 |
vipul | i think juice had some tricks | 22:54 |
kagan | but it will apply to a full folder and not a single file. | 22:54 |
hub_cap | if thre is that'd rock | 22:54 |
kagan | i tried it, and all the files where modified, so naturally you're not all using that … ;) | 22:54 |
juice | pycharm will warn you and offer to fix it | 22:54 |
hub_cap | but i mod them manually before i chek in | 22:54 |
kagan | also, there is "autopep8 -i my_file.py" | 22:54 |
kagan | eclipse/pydev will also warn. | 22:54 |
hub_cap | im slightly scared of that, personally | 22:54 |
hub_cap | but i say go fer it | 22:55 |
kagan | i just thing it would be good if we could use a tool, and preferably the same one | 22:55 |
juice | the benefit to pycharm is that it finds it sort of real time | 22:55 |
hub_cap | kagan: i agree | 22:55 |
hub_cap | we had nice formatters in java | 22:55 |
kagan | same with pydev, juice | 22:55 |
hub_cap | that woudl do it for us | 22:55 |
kagan | what ide are you guys using? | 22:55 |
datsun180b | vim | 22:55 |
kagan | nice ... | 22:55 |
vipul | lol | 22:55 |
djohnstone | hahaha | 22:55 |
datsun180b | you think i'm kidding | 22:55 |
vipul | wrong crowd | 22:56 |
kagan | "réal monkeys, ehh… programers! use vi!!" | 22:56 |
hub_cap | hahaah ide :P | 22:56 |
SlickNik | emacs here, but let's not get started on that again :) | 22:56 |
hub_cap | i use textmate | 22:56 |
kagan | ok, i see | 22:56 |
hub_cap | lets all agree to disagree | 22:56 |
imsplitbit | yeah that fight has gone on 30 years | 22:56 |
grapex | Sublime. PyCharm is pretty good but Sublime is faster. | 22:56 |
vipul | btw, openstack has a free PyCharm license | 22:56 |
vipul | if you are contributing to Openstack that is | 22:56 |
vipul | just an FYI | 22:56 |
kagan | so it either has to be some stand alone tool, like autopep8 or we find that it actually does the same as an integrated extension | 22:56 |
imsplitbit | pycharm on any modern computer works fine | 22:56 |
datsun180b | so i did want to bring up an issue briefly | 22:57 |
kagan | ok, so do you agree we might want to use some formatting tool? | 22:57 |
grapex | kagan: I think we should let people use the tools they want and trust tox pep8 to check it. | 22:57 |
kagan | and we don't want that every time we use it, it'll modify it differently than the other guy? | 22:57 |
imsplitbit | grapex, agreed | 22:57 |
vipul | kagan: if you find one.. and it works with tox -epep8, please share | 22:57 |
hub_cap | ya will using a tool or not using a tool not provide the same output? | 22:57 |
grapex | I guess I miss the point- pep8 should keep us from having a different format from each other | 22:58 |
datsun180b | oh i can show you ways that even pep8 doesn't enforce the spirit of PEP8 | 22:58 |
kagan | the thing is, if i want to use such a tool, it'll introduce too many changes every time i touch a file, unless we all use the same tool ... | 22:58 |
imsplitbit | :-) | 22:58 |
datsun180b | i trust humans over robots in this case | 22:58 |
hub_cap | +1 to humans | 22:58 |
grapex | kagan: If that's the case, maybe that tool needs to be tweaked to match pep8. The other OS projects are using it so we may have trouble changing the format. :( | 22:58 |
kagan | you can split a line in many places to have both halves at the proper length. just an example ... | 22:59 |
datsun180b | there's also the consideration that we'd have to include the tool in our AUTHORS file | 22:59 |
kagan | it complies with pep8 of course !!! | 22:59 |
grapex | datsun180b: lol! | 22:59 |
grapex | kagan: The community might be open to a superset of pep8 | 22:59 |
kagan | we just need to agree to use the same formatter | 22:59 |
hub_cap | kagan: i dont think thats gonna happen honestly | 22:59 |
juice | same format of pep8 compliant? | 22:59 |
kagan | again, i just don't want too many changes every time i apply a formatting tool to a file | 22:59 |
hub_cap | we can mandate pep8 | 22:59 |
hub_cap | but telling eveyrone who ever codes on the proejct to use tool X instead of just being compliant is not gonna go over well | 23:00 |
kagan | so, how do you guys make it pep8? run tox and fix manually as you see fit? | 23:00 |
hub_cap | yup | 23:00 |
hub_cap | i run tox before i git review | 23:00 |
vipul | yea that's how most people do it | 23:00 |
hub_cap | or a few times during a cycle if its big | 23:00 |
kagan | well, wouldn't you prefer a tool to do that for you? | 23:00 |
juice | have you seen a discrepancy between pydev/charm pep 8 and fox? | 23:00 |
hub_cap | _prefer_ is a strong word | 23:00 |
kagan | if it's a stand alone tool, you can still edit wherever you like ... | 23:01 |
vipul | lol | 23:01 |
hub_cap | i dont prefer a tool to do it at all | 23:01 |
SlickNik | _tool_ is a stronger word. :) | 23:01 |
annashen | you can run pep8 individually | 23:01 |
hub_cap | yes of which i am one most of the time SlickNik | 23:01 |
vipul | hehe | 23:01 |
hub_cap | but yall know that | 23:01 |
grapex | kagan: So I've noticed running different versions of pep8 gives different results | 23:01 |
grapex | for awhile datsun180b was running pep8 locally | 23:01 |
vipul | yea that's probably why it looks different | 23:01 |
datsun180b | that is true, the newer ones are a lower limbo bar | 23:01 |
grapex | then we introduced tox and he found out he'd formatted it differently | 23:01 |
datsun180b | i AM pep8 | 23:01 |
grapex | maybe its a simple as making sure your IDE is using the exact same version as tox? | 23:02 |
kagan | i don't understand the objection to use a formatter tool … please explain | 23:02 |
hub_cap | simple | 23:02 |
hub_cap | not everyone will use it | 23:02 |
vipul | it's like a religious war.. not that simple.. | 23:02 |
hub_cap | unless we hook it in to a post commit hook | 23:02 |
datsun180b | use the formatter if you want, it'll still have to pass under pep8's scrutiny | 23:02 |
hub_cap | someone will not use it | 23:02 |
vipul | yep | 23:02 |
hub_cap | and then when u format it it will change their code | 23:02 |
hub_cap | and we will have this convesation again | 23:02 |
datsun180b | I'll say it now, I'm not going to outsource my style to a robot | 23:02 |
hub_cap | and it will recycle again and again | 23:02 |
hub_cap | +1 datsun180b | 23:02 |
kagan | you guys are crazy … ;) | 23:03 |
juice | I also don't like getting a bunch of changes that are all whitespace | 23:03 |
vipul | kagan: if you find one that basically keeps the 'good' files the same | 23:03 |
juice | makes merges messy | 23:03 |
hub_cap | kagan: go ask nova to do it | 23:03 |
hub_cap | if u can get them to comply | 23:03 |
hub_cap | we will gladly comply | 23:03 |
grapex | datsun180b was much like you kagan, until he too was forced to drink the kool-aid... join us... join us... :) | 23:03 |
kagan | i hate to format manually, that all ... | 23:03 |
hub_cap | and ill give u 100 bucks | 23:03 |
kagan | :) | 23:03 |
datsun180b | more like you guys didn't understand pep8 | 23:03 |
kagan | what do you mean? | 23:03 |
datsun180b | i had to beat the \ off the end of your broken lines | 23:03 |
hub_cap | this coming from a guy who hates pep8 | 23:03 |
kagan | is \ not a pep8 ? | 23:04 |
hub_cap | kagan: datsun180b referiing to the rest of the rackers | 23:04 |
datsun180b | i hate pep8, the checking tool. I embrace PEP8, the guideline document | 23:04 |
esp1 | lol | 23:04 |
hub_cap | go hug your pep8 datsun180b | 23:04 |
datsun180b | >>> import this | 23:04 |
SlickNik | lolol | 23:04 |
kagan | but we all have to comply with pep8, right? | 23:04 |
hub_cap | def | 23:04 |
datsun180b | kagan: absolutely | 23:04 |
hub_cap | but we dont have to comply w/ some robots version of it :) | 23:04 |
kagan | so why not use something like autopep8 to do it for us? | 23:05 |
kagan | what do you care ?? | 23:05 |
hub_cap | cuz we cannot guarantee everyone will do that | 23:05 |
kagan | we just need to try ... | 23:05 |
hub_cap | how can u make everyone from now to the end of this project guarantee to use it? | 23:05 |
datsun180b | because we're better at parsing pep8's message than any fsm-based machine | 23:05 |
vipul | yea the moment one person doesn't... | 23:05 |
hub_cap | BOOM | 23:05 |
kagan | if you all *dont* want to use it, then no one can ... | 23:05 |
vipul | you could.. on individual files | 23:05 |
hub_cap | not true... just annoying for that person ;) | 23:05 |
vipul | that you actually modified | 23:05 |
esp1 | fyi no one has beaten dror in a fillibuster... | 23:05 |
kagan | well, if only one occasionally doesn't it's not that bad, but i think i'm a minority here ... | 23:06 |
hub_cap | lol... we can try | 23:06 |
imsplitbit | hub_cap, http://tech.myemma.com/python-pep8-git-hooks/ | 23:06 |
datsun180b | full reveal, if you check our commit history i do have commits with the comment "pep8 fixes" | 23:06 |
hub_cap | imsplitbit: im sure it _can_ be done :) | 23:06 |
imsplitbit | I have pre commit hooks to run pep8 on my python | 23:06 |
imsplitbit | code that is | 23:06 |
vipul | lol | 23:06 |
hub_cap | snazzy | 23:06 |
kagan | so, i guess no agreement here … ok, i tired. | 23:07 |
kagan | second issue: | 23:07 |
esp1 | kagan: you should give PyCharm a try. you might find that it does a decent job. | 23:07 |
kagan | debugging unittest code. | 23:07 |
kagan | do you guys debug the nose tests? | 23:07 |
kagan | cause when we tried, they failed just by running in debug mode. | 23:07 |
hub_cap | as in, via pdb? | 23:07 |
kagan | we then found 2 places in the code where if i put sleep (no matter how small the sleep time is) it will fail the test even when not in debug mode | 23:08 |
datsun180b | i did want to bring up an issue about testing | 23:08 |
datsun180b | so you're probably leading to the point i wanted to make | 23:08 |
kagan | was wondering if you ever manage to debug those, as in step by step | 23:08 |
vipul | well it's not related to debugging | 23:08 |
vipul | it's if you put a sleep in a certain spot | 23:08 |
vipul | the tests fail | 23:08 |
vipul | no matter how small the sleep is | 23:09 |
datsun180b | devil's advocate: sleep(0) ? | 23:09 |
kagan | i tried 0.000000000001 | 23:09 |
kagan | not sure about 0 though ... | 23:09 |
kagan | would guess it'd fail as well ... | 23:09 |
vipul | wondering there is something in the proboscic framework that causes this? | 23:09 |
grapex | Is it when you call time.sleep? | 23:09 |
kagan | yes | 23:09 |
grapex | Or just when you literally spend some time with the program paused? | 23:09 |
kagan | no | 23:10 |
kagan | we tried spending time with a long loop | 23:10 |
grapex | That's because time.sleep is monkey patched out so the tests will run quickly | 23:10 |
kagan | it worked | 23:10 |
kagan | right! | 23:10 |
kagan | we saw that ... | 23:10 |
vipul | hah.. | 23:10 |
grapex | So it runs the event simulator | 23:10 |
datsun180b | oh, flashbacks to poll_until | 23:10 |
grapex | basically running things that would have run as different threads right away | 23:10 |
kagan | we didn't understand how come the whole test suite ran faster than a single sleep, when we know the sleep had to happen 12 times !!! | 23:10 |
vipul | but why does that cuase it to fail? | 23:11 |
kagan | but why would it fail the tests? | 23:11 |
vipul | since it should be ignored? | 23:11 |
grapex | If you'd like to debug the tests, it's possible if we change it not to simulate events | 23:11 |
grapex | In run_tests.py, change line 43 | 23:12 |
grapex | Because, calling sleep tells it to run any pending events. | 23:12 |
kagan | change to what? | 23:12 |
grapex | I'm not sure why it fails. We never had luck running PyCharm in debug mode for anything other than simple unit tests. | 23:12 |
grapex | kagan: In the reddwarf code | 23:13 |
kagan | and is that the same reason if fails while in debug mode? | 23:13 |
kagan | change the line to be what? | 23:13 |
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann-afk | 23:13 | |
grapex | Line 43 - just comment it out | 23:13 |
kagan | ok | 23:13 |
kagan | i'll try | 23:13 |
grapex | Ditto to line 89 | 23:13 |
kagan | line 89 is only if i want to use sleep, right? | 23:14 |
kagan | we used sleep just to prove a point. our main concern was running in debug mode | 23:14 |
grapex | Line 89 changes sleep to run functions which would have run in a seperate thread | 23:14 |
hub_cap | id prefer to comment all lines %7 ==0 out | 23:14 |
vipul | and just see what happens :) | 23:15 |
kagan | hub_cap, what do you mean ?? | 23:15 |
datsun180b | hub_cap: oh there's a sed oneliner for that | 23:15 |
juice | there was an option in intellij that would pause all threads in debug mode when stepping through to prevent timer threads from timing out while you did you're mental investigation | 23:15 |
kagan | joke, right ??! | 23:15 |
hub_cap | LOL kagan grapex | 23:15 |
hub_cap | of course :P | 23:15 |
datsun180b | i can't remember how to select just lines %7==0 as a movement in vim | 23:16 |
kagan | de vencci code running in front of me … | 23:16 |
vipul | datsun180b you had an 'issue'? | 23:16 |
SlickNik | you were mentioning something about test timing? | 23:16 |
hub_cap | ha kagan | 23:17 |
datsun180b | yeah, i lost some time trying to get my work done until i got https://review.openstack.org/#/c/23018/ done | 23:17 |
datsun180b | spinning up a vm with clean pulls from stackforge before that change, i simply couldn't build and spin up an instance | 23:17 |
grapex | datsun180b: Were the public real mode tests working before that commit? | 23:18 |
vipul | oh yea that was my bad.. i should have fixed the issue | 23:18 |
vipul | so we have two paths to deploying now | 23:18 |
vipul | i've been using the local.sh approach | 23:18 |
vipul | which doesn't suffer from this | 23:18 |
datsun180b | vipul: it's not an issue of blame, but one of being able to prevent that that i care about | 23:18 |
grapex | vipul: Is that in devstack? | 23:18 |
vipul | no, that's in redstack.. | 23:18 |
vipul | so if build your environment the 'old' way | 23:19 |
vipul | redstack install, redstack build, redstack kick-start.. etc | 23:19 |
vipul | that change is required for things to work | 23:19 |
vipul | if you copy 'local.sh' into devstack/ | 23:19 |
vipul | and just run stack.sh | 23:19 |
vipul | then you don't see the issue | 23:19 |
vipul | what it boils down to is... we need to not have two paths | 23:19 |
datsun180b | would probably help not to just be keeping that in your head | 23:19 |
SlickNik | I've been meaning to unify the two approaches so that redstack uses the hooks in devstack to run, but I haven't had much time to work on it. :( | 23:20 |
vipul | yea.. i noticed after some others saw it | 23:20 |
SlickNik | I should really do that since it would help not have some of these issues creep up. | 23:20 |
*** grapex has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:20 | |
vipul | sorry, should have put something in the reddwarf channel | 23:20 |
*** grapex has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:20 | |
hub_cap | hai grapex | 23:20 |
grapex | Good ole OSX key bindings... | 23:20 |
esp1 | yeah I lost 5hrs one day. SlickNik saved me. | 23:21 |
hub_cap | LOL | 23:21 |
grapex | That broke us at Rax for awhile | 23:21 |
vipul | So do we want to trim down redstack? so we don't have to maintain 2 ways of set up? | 23:21 |
datsun180b | even now there's one more change to make to our internal fork that i haven't nailed down yet, something about keystone | 23:21 |
grapex | We need to be careful when we make changes like this to make sure we keep track of changes that will they may mandate in Reddwarf Integration | 23:21 |
vipul | right.. this is where the vm-gate would have caught this | 23:21 |
hub_cap | i would love to trip redstack if we can | 23:22 |
hub_cap | *trim | 23:22 |
vipul | changes to multiple projects are hard to coordinate | 23:22 |
grapex | vipul: Agreed. What if we just changed redstack to call local.sh? | 23:22 |
vipul | yea, or rather copy local.sh to devstack and invoke stack.sh | 23:22 |
SlickNik | grapex: that was what my comment above was about. | 23:22 |
grapex | SlickNik:Ok, I probably missed it when I ducked out. :) | 23:22 |
grapex | vipul: I think copying it to devstack makes the most sense | 23:22 |
grapex | trying to think if doing it that way precludes us from anything | 23:23 |
vipul | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Reddwarf-installation | 23:23 |
vipul | FYI ^^ is the 'preferred' way of set up | 23:23 |
vipul | until we trim Redstack | 23:23 |
kagan | so i took line 43 out, (and all the mod7 ones as well) but now the tests takes much more time to run and still fail ... | 23:23 |
kagan | why would this line break the tests if ran in debug mode? | 23:23 |
grapex | kagan: Those are integration tests, it's going to be very tricky to debug them. | 23:24 |
hub_cap | lol kagan to mod7 | 23:24 |
kagan | no, i'm not talking about those ... | 23:24 |
SlickNik | #action SlickNik look into trimming down redstack to install devstack using the local.sh way. | 23:24 |
grapex | If you need to run a debugger, run reddwarf server in fake mode and set break points, then run the tests from another process | 23:24 |
kagan | just the unit test ones | 23:24 |
datsun180b | :g/^/if !(line('.')%7)|s/^/#/|endif | 23:24 |
datsun180b | by the way | 23:24 |
kagan | i have no live environment ... | 23:24 |
grapex | kagan: there's got to be some way to run the testr tests by themselves without the run_test.py script | 23:24 |
SlickNik | hahah, nicely done datsun180b... | 23:24 |
grapex | kagan: You don't need a live environment thankfully. You can run reddwarf in fake mode locally | 23:25 |
kagan | tester tests run nicely under debug mode | 23:25 |
* hub_cap shakes head at datsun180b | 23:25 | |
kagan | testr | 23:25 |
vipul | thanks SlickNik for the actino | 23:25 |
grapex | kagan: Look at reddwarf/bin/reddwarf-server | 23:25 |
* datsun180b wonders how to run pycharm in debug mode from vim | 23:25 | |
hub_cap | so should we call this meeting? | 23:25 |
kagan | but if i run run_test.py it only runs well in run mode, not debug mode ... | 23:25 |
grapex | testr is running unit tests which are simplier. | 23:25 |
hub_cap | and move this to #reddwarf? | 23:25 |
datsun180b | in think we've overstayed our reservation, or nearly so | 23:26 |
kagan | i'm ok with this | 23:26 |
hub_cap | <3 | 23:26 |
hub_cap | #endmeeting | 23:26 |
SlickNik | np vipul, it's been at the back of my mind. I think I've even bugged it. Just haven't had a chance to do it yet. | 23:26 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings (alternate) || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack" | 23:26 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Tue Mar 5 23:26:31 2013 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 23:26 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/reddwarf/2013/reddwarf.2013-03-05-21.59.html | 23:26 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/reddwarf/2013/reddwarf.2013-03-05-21.59.txt | 23:26 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/reddwarf/2013/reddwarf.2013-03-05-21.59.log.html | 23:26 |
clarkb | really quick. I think you should get the proper version of python-reddwarfclient now | 23:26 |
clarkb | the mirror only has version 1.2.0 at the moment | 23:26 |
datsun180b | clarkb: thanks a lot. | 23:27 |
grapex | clarkb: Cool | 23:27 |
SlickNik | sweet. | 23:27 |
*** SlickNik has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:28 | |
*** imsplitbit has quit IRC | 23:28 | |
*** djohnstone has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
*** esp1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:29 | |
*** jcru has quit IRC | 23:35 | |
*** datsun180b has quit IRC | 23:52 | |
*** jrodom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!