Thursday, 2014-02-27

*** kevinbenton is now known as kevin00:05
*** kevin is now known as kevinbenton00:05
*** jjmb has quit IRC00:05
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:06
*** zns has quit IRC00:06
*** NehaV1 has quit IRC00:12
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:16
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs00:16
*** arborism is now known as amcrn00:19
*** HenryG_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:21
*** HenryG has quit IRC00:22
*** jjmb has quit IRC00:22
*** garyduan has quit IRC00:22
*** david_lyle_ has quit IRC00:23
*** flaper87 has quit IRC00:23
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:23
*** flaper87 has quit IRC00:23
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:23
*** markwash has quit IRC00:25
*** saurabhs1 has quit IRC00:29
*** eankutse has quit IRC00:29
*** sarob_ has quit IRC00:30
*** saurabhs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:32
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:32
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC00:35
*** saurabhs has quit IRC00:35
*** sarob has quit IRC00:36
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:41
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC00:41
*** shakayumi has quit IRC00:41
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:42
*** shakayumi has quit IRC00:42
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:43
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk00:44
*** dshurtle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:46
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:46
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC00:47
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:47
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:47
*** saurabhs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:49
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:49
*** saurabhs has left #openstack-meeting-alt00:53
*** amytron has quit IRC00:55
*** dshurtle has quit IRC00:58
*** dshurtle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:58
*** dshurtle has quit IRC00:58
*** dshurtle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:58
*** dshurtle has quit IRC00:58
*** alazarev has quit IRC00:58
*** dshurtle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:59
*** atiwari has quit IRC00:59
*** kevinconway has quit IRC01:01
*** pdmars_ has quit IRC01:02
*** dshurtle has quit IRC01:02
*** dshurtle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:03
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC01:03
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC01:05
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja01:05
*** dshurtle has quit IRC01:08
*** dshurtle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:09
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:13
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC01:16
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:16
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:16
*** gokrokve has quit IRC01:20
*** Kanzhe has quit IRC01:23
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:24
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:35
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC01:38
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC01:41
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:44
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:44
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:46
*** cjellick has quit IRC01:50
*** michael-yu has quit IRC01:53
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:01
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk02:04
*** bill_az has quit IRC02:07
*** dkehn__ is now known as dkehn02:15
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:17
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:19
*** yamahata has quit IRC02:23
*** cjellick has quit IRC02:25
*** richm has quit IRC02:25
*** dshurtle has quit IRC02:26
*** NehaV has quit IRC02:27
*** khyati has quit IRC02:28
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:29
*** alazarev has quit IRC02:31
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:32
*** mandeep has quit IRC02:33
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:36
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC02:37
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC02:43
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:44
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:47
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC02:48
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:51
*** khyati has quit IRC02:54
*** derekh is now known as derekh_afk02:57
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC03:01
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:01
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC03:02
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:07
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:08
*** baoli has quit IRC03:08
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:11
*** baoli has quit IRC03:13
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC03:13
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:14
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC03:15
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:16
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan03:16
*** alazarev has quit IRC03:18
*** gusmaskowitz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:19
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:20
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC03:21
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:22
*** sfineberg has quit IRC03:25
*** cjellick has quit IRC03:26
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:27
*** nikhil__ has quit IRC03:31
*** nikhil__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:32
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:32
*** sfineberg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:32
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:36
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:38
*** coolsvap has quit IRC03:42
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC03:42
*** sarob has quit IRC03:45
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:50
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:50
*** gusmaskowitz has quit IRC03:51
*** gusmaskowitz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:56
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:56
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:58
*** alazarev has quit IRC04:00
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:03
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC04:04
*** gusmaskowitz has quit IRC04:06
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:08
*** michael-yu has quit IRC04:09
*** hockeynut has quit IRC04:15
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:17
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:22
*** arnaud has quit IRC04:24
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:24
*** NehaV1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:28
*** NehaV has quit IRC04:28
*** NehaV1 has quit IRC04:28
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:28
*** eankutse has quit IRC04:39
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:39
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:41
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:45
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC04:46
*** lblanchard has quit IRC04:47
*** sarob has quit IRC04:48
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC04:51
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:52
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:55
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:56
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC04:59
*** markwash has quit IRC04:59
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC04:59
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:04
*** NehaV has quit IRC05:04
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:05
*** alazarev has quit IRC05:10
*** HenryG_ has quit IRC05:16
*** coolsvap has quit IRC05:16
*** HenryG_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:16
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:17
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:17
*** _ozstacker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:20
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC05:22
*** ozstacker has quit IRC05:23
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:42
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:44
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:46
*** baoli has quit IRC05:46
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC05:46
*** Ranjitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:47
*** sarob has quit IRC05:50
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:55
*** sballe has quit IRC05:59
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:01
*** eankutse has quit IRC06:04
*** michael-yu has quit IRC06:06
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC06:09
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:29
*** SushilKM has quit IRC06:33
*** sarob has quit IRC06:46
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:46
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:48
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:51
*** sarob has quit IRC06:51
*** gokrokve has quit IRC06:53
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:54
*** gyee has quit IRC07:00
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt07:02
*** denis_makogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:11
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:15
*** alazarev has quit IRC07:17
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away07:23
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:23
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:25
*** gokrokve has quit IRC07:28
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC07:30
*** sirushti is now known as shortstop07:32
*** Leonr has quit IRC07:34
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:40
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:46
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:47
*** sarob has quit IRC07:51
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8707:52
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:54
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:56
*** michael-yu has quit IRC07:58
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:03
*** luqas has quit IRC08:03
*** saju_m has quit IRC08:10
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:11
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:11
*** yamahata has quit IRC08:15
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC08:16
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:17
*** aignatov_ is now known as aignatov08:17
*** michael-yu has quit IRC08:22
*** yogesh has quit IRC08:23
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:23
*** enikanorov__ is now known as enikanorov08:24
*** saju_m has quit IRC08:25
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:26
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:26
*** cjellick has quit IRC08:28
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:29
*** gokrokve has quit IRC08:30
*** chandankumar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:32
*** denis_makogon_ has quit IRC08:33
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:33
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC08:35
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:36
*** michael-yu has quit IRC08:37
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC08:39
*** jrist has quit IRC08:41
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:42
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:48
*** amcrn has quit IRC08:48
*** aignatov is now known as aignatov_08:48
*** saju_m has quit IRC08:52
*** sarob has quit IRC08:53
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:54
*** aignatov_ is now known as aignatov08:55
*** aignatov is now known as aignatov_08:56
*** aignatov_ is now known as aignatov08:57
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC08:58
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC09:03
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:03
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:05
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:16
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC09:21
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:26
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:28
*** gokrokve has quit IRC09:31
*** derekh_afk is now known as derekh09:34
*** NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov09:38
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:51
*** d0ugal has quit IRC09:54
*** luqas has quit IRC09:55
*** sarob has quit IRC09:56
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:04
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:13
*** aignatov is now known as aignatov_10:17
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC10:19
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:19
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:26
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:28
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:29
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:31
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC10:31
*** gokrokve has quit IRC10:31
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:32
*** johnthetubaguy1 has quit IRC10:32
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:32
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC10:32
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:34
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC10:35
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:35
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:35
*** Ranjitha has quit IRC10:43
*** johnthetubaguy1 is now known as johnthetubaguy10:44
*** NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_10:47
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:54
*** NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov10:54
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:59
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC11:00
*** sarob has quit IRC11:01
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:01
*** aignatov_ is now known as aignatov11:03
*** julienvey1 has quit IRC11:03
*** jgallard has quit IRC11:05
*** aignatov is now known as aignatov_11:05
*** aignatov_ is now known as aignatov11:07
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC11:11
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:14
*** nosnos has quit IRC11:14
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:21
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC11:25
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:26
*** Leonr has quit IRC11:26
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:28
*** gokrokve has quit IRC11:31
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC11:33
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:46
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:48
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:48
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:49
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:53
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:56
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:57
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC11:59
*** luqas has quit IRC11:59
*** jjmb has quit IRC12:02
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:02
*** sarob has quit IRC12:02
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:03
*** eanxgeek|log is now known as eanxgeek12:03
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:04
*** baoli has quit IRC12:13
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC12:17
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC12:19
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:23
*** baoli has quit IRC12:23
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:24
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:24
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:26
*** gokrokve has quit IRC12:30
*** yamahata has quit IRC12:31
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:33
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC12:38
*** luqas has quit IRC12:39
*** heyongli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:49
*** yamahata has quit IRC12:52
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC12:53
*** saju_m has quit IRC12:53
*** heyongli has quit IRC12:53
*** PeterSchwaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:00
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:00
*** sarob has quit IRC13:05
*** rohit404 has quit IRC13:07
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:08
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:09
*** esheffield has quit IRC13:12
*** esheffield has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:14
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:15
*** david-lyle has quit IRC13:16
*** b3nt_pin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:20
*** b3nt_pin is now known as beagles13:20
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:21
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:25
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
*** gokrokve has quit IRC13:30
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:32
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:34
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:40
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:40
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC13:46
*** HenryG_ has quit IRC13:47
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:51
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:51
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:52
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** arnaud__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:54
*** yamahata has quit IRC13:55
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
*** aignatov is now known as aignatov_13:58
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** ashwini has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:02
*** rosmaita_ is now known as rosmaita14:03
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:04
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
*** sriram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
*** sriram has quit IRC14:06
*** sriram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
*** aignatov_ is now known as aignatov14:06
*** sarob has quit IRC14:08
*** dkehn__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:08
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:11
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:11
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC14:12
*** eankutse has quit IRC14:12
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
*** bugsduggan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:13
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:15
*** jecarey has quit IRC14:15
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs14:16
*** bugsduggan has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:20
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:21
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** haleyb has quit IRC14:27
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:28
*** NehaV1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:29
*** dkehn__ is now known as dkehn_14:29
*** NehaV has quit IRC14:29
*** gokrokve has quit IRC14:31
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:31
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
markwasho/14:32
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
*** jbernard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:34
markwash#startmeeting glance14:34
openstackMeeting started Thu Feb 27 14:34:29 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is markwash. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:34
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:34
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: glance)"14:34
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'glance'14:34
* IgorYozhikov is now away: went away...14:34
*** IgorYozhikov is now known as IYozhikov_away14:34
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:35
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:35
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:36
*** ftcjeff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:36
markwashshall we start here?14:36
arnaud__yes14:36
zhiyanyes, thanks14:36
markwashcan we get a quick roll call?14:37
ativelkovo/14:37
jbernardo/14:38
markwashanybody else? rosmaita ?14:38
markwashokay14:38
markwashsorry I'm late today14:38
markwashit sounds like you guys were already talking about artifacts stuff14:39
ativelkovyes14:39
markwashany status updates, there have been some good email discussions14:39
ativelkovWell, I didn't have much time to work on the APIs themselves, unfortunately, but got some questions on artifact dependencies which I wanted to discuss14:40
markwashokay cool14:40
ativelkovPlan to come back to the API design on the next week14:40
markwashjbernard: it seems like based on our conversations, cinder support is an early requirement for instance templates for you14:40
markwashcorrect?14:41
jbernardfor me at least, yes14:41
ativelkov#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-February/028073.html - chain about the dependencies14:41
markwashjbernard: that does make a lot of sense14:41
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC14:41
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:41
markwashativelkov: jbernard: it seemed like maybe you two had a solution for including cinder where cinder references just weren't artifacts, they were regular attributes, and their behavior was plugin or client specific14:42
jbernardyeah, the feature would be incomplete without it14:42
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:42
markwashs/client specific/client defined/14:42
ativelkovThat's how I see it. The plugin can put the locks, do the volume validation etc.14:42
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk14:42
markwashjbernard: does that idea sound like it could work? is there some alternative you prefer?14:43
*** kevinconway has quit IRC14:43
jbernardit sounds reasonable to me14:43
ativelkovHowever we may introduce an artifact type "cinder volume" which will not have any binary backing - just an immutable metadata attribute referencing the volume in cinder14:43
ativelkovand store this artifact in glance, and then have a dependency between "instance template" and this "cinder volume"14:44
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC14:44
markwashativelkov: it would be nice if we could do that, however if the glance service doesn't own the cinder volume it seems it would have integrity problems14:44
*** luqas has quit IRC14:44
jbernardit will probably require some cinder enhancements - immutable or reference counted volumes perhaps14:44
markwashyeah14:44
markwashso maybe that could be a follow up approach14:44
zhiyanjbernard: currently cinder support readonly a volume14:45
markwashzhiyan: but the owner can still delete that volume, correct?14:45
markwashthat's the issue14:45
jbernardyes, but there is no mechanism to describe external references14:45
zhiyanyes14:45
ativelkovWell, it's the question of agreements. Glance does not own the image binaries if they are put into swift, right? So, somebody can delete the image from swift and this will cause the integrity problems. But we just assume that nobody will do that14:46
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:46
zhiyanto make the volume be immutable, but volumen entry can still be deleted14:46
markwashativelkov: generally glance owns them today14:46
ativelkovEven if they are stored externally, e.g. in swift?14:46
markwashyes14:47
markwashthe single tenant swift store does not use user credentials14:47
*** NehaV1 has quit IRC14:47
ativelkovah, didn't know that14:48
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:48
zhiyanativelkov: so do you think we can make the artifact metadata be consistent via a periodical checking14:48
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:48
markwashperiodic checking of what?14:48
zhiyanmarkwash: for a volume, in this case14:49
markwashzhiyan: I don't think that's the kind of consistency we're looking for14:49
ativelkovI am not sure about "periodic"14:49
markwashwe want consistency such that the reference never changes14:49
markwashnot that the reference is always accurate14:49
markwashwell we want that too14:49
markwashimmutable, and accurate14:49
ativelkovWe may make plugins responsible for ensuring the validity of their artifacts14:49
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
*** flwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:50
arnaud__tbh, I think at this point we are going too specific where the design for the basic is there yet14:50
markwashwell, and perhaps we should move on14:50
markwashthere is one other item on the agenda for today14:50
markwash#topic removing sensitive info from locations14:50
*** openstack changes topic to "removing sensitive info from locations (Meeting topic: glance)"14:50
*** akerr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:51
markwashrosmaita and I were looking at this blueprint again in last weeks drivers meeting14:51
markwashit seemed like at the mini summit there was a recognition that just removing credentials from locations wouldn't solve our problems like I imagined14:52
markwashit definitely solves the problem of making credential management a bit simpler in terms of changing passwords on swift accounts14:52
markwashhowever, it adds to problems with distributing credentials around a deployment14:53
markwashand it doesn't really help as much with the client direct download story, because it requires all of those clients to somehow have the same credentials stored locally14:53
markwashso the question in my mind is, do we still want to do it just for a solution to the first problem?14:54
rosmaita+1 first prob only14:54
*** akerr has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:54
rosmaitai still think credentials should be managed by keystone, if a client needs them, that's wehre they should come from14:55
flwangmarkwash: are you ware of any other backend will be impacted by this https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1275062 ?14:55
arnaud__the first pb is solved by iccha_'s review, that's correct markwash?14:55
*** rkukura has quit IRC14:55
markwasharnaud__: yes14:55
markwashflwang: I'm actually not sure, I think it is mostly swift14:55
zhiyantbh i have a question, can keystone help us, i mean save credentials to keystone, and glance.store query them when needed?14:56
markwashzhiyan: it seemed that perhaps barbican was going to help solve that problem14:56
markwashbut what we need is not just secure key storage14:56
markwashbut also key sharing14:56
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:56
flwangmarkwash: but the problem code is happening at common part, not swift specific, that makes me nervous14:57
markwashflwang: perhaps we should make a pass through the code to see if other stores would be vulnerable as well14:57
markwashand how, in general, other stores are using credentials14:57
flwangmarkwash: +114:57
markwashjust as a general survey14:57
markwashwe have 2 or 3 minutes now14:58
flwangmarkwash: it would be nice14:58
flwanganybody know is there any other store will contain the credential in the location?14:58
markwashrosmaita: okay, perhaps I can take another look at barbican and see how it fits this story, and we can unblock this bp14:58
flwangsheepdog, gridfs, rbd14:58
arnaud__s3?14:58
markwashcan someone volunteer to look at that and follow up next week?14:59
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC14:59
*** dkehn__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
flwangmarkwash: I will do that14:59
markwash#topic community images14:59
*** openstack changes topic to "community images (Meeting topic: glance)"14:59
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
markwashdid we settle on 'community' as the least bad? that was about where I was. . .14:59
markwashleast bad name, that is14:59
rosmaita+115:00
markwashhmm, we need to clear out for the next meeting15:00
markwashokay, guys thanks! sorry I was late15:00
markwash#endmeeting15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Feb 27 15:00:36 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-02-27-14.34.html15:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-02-27-14.34.txt15:00
rosmaitabye!15:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-02-27-14.34.log.html15:00
flwangbye15:00
ativelkovbye15:00
*** csaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
*** ativelkov has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
bswartz#startmeeting manila15:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Feb 27 15:01:23 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: manila)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:01
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** jbernard has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
bswartzgood morning/evening folks15:01
vponomaryovHello15:01
xyang1hi15:01
*** Guest50561 is now known as scottda15:01
scottdaHi15:01
bswartzI don't have an agenda today15:02
bswartzlast 3 days I took a vacation to cinder land15:02
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC15:02
*** dkehn__ is now known as dkehn_15:02
bswartzThere were some last minute I-3 things that needed some attention15:02
*** ashwini has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
yportnovahi15:03
bswartzbut manila is just as important15:03
bswartzactually I do have one thing15:03
bswartzI understand there are some folk in Australia who are very interested in manila15:03
bswartzbut they can't attend this meeting because it's sometime after midnight right now15:04
*** akerr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:05
bswartzI want to accomodate some of the oceania timezones better15:05
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:05
bswartzthe 2 options we have are to do an alternating meeting, or to keep these meetings and add a suplemental meeting for the oceania folks15:05
vponomaryovbswartz: for first step they can use manila chat15:06
*** jpipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
vponomaryovwithout schedule15:06
*** yamahata has quit IRC15:06
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
scottdaI notice that openstack-manila is very quiet. Or is it just me?15:07
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
bswartzeither way, I would probably propose 0100 UTC or 0200 UTC for the alternate meeting15:07
*** jpipes has quit IRC15:07
*** noslzzp has quit IRC15:07
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:08
*** jaypipes has quit IRC15:08
bswartzscottda: yeah that's been the trend15:08
bswartzscottda: most of the conversations are during these weekly meetings or in offline meetings15:09
bswartzwe already have someone serious timezone issues15:09
scottdaOK, probably also a result of such a small group of devs and users15:09
bswartzyeah the group is small and very spread out around the world15:09
bswartzif some of the australians join then that will get worse15:09
vponomaryovchat is quiet - yes, but who restricts to have a talk?15:10
bswartzbut I'm nearly always online during USA hours and you can ping me if you want to talk15:10
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:10
bswartzanyways I just wanted to mention that briefly15:10
bswartzwe don't make any changes to the meeting schedule yet15:10
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
bswartzI'll start up some conversations and maybe we can move to 1.5 meetings per week15:11
bswartzwith the 0.5 meetings per week being at 0200 UTC in addition to the current regular meeting15:11
bswartzenough on that15:11
bswartz#topic dev status15:12
*** openstack changes topic to "dev status (Meeting topic: manila)"15:12
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
*** sarob has quit IRC15:12
vponomaryovDev status:15:12
vponomaryov1) NetApp Cmode driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59100/15:12
vponomaryovWaiting for reviews, after changes. Not critical nits are expected to be fixed after main merge of driver.15:12
vponomaryov2) Horizon's manila extension: https://github.com/NetApp/horizon/tree/manila15:13
bswartzoh Jenkins is passing again15:13
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:13
bswartzthanks yportnova -- I'll review that change again15:13
vponomaryov3) Devstack with generic driver: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74647/15:13
vponomaryovrelated bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/128561215:13
*** BBG_Stephen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:13
*** cjellick has quit IRC15:13
vponomaryov4) Generic driver's modularity: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74154/15:14
vponomaryovWaiting for reviews, after changes. Not critical nits are expected to be fixed after main merge15:14
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:14
vponomaryov5) Volume types: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74772/ (client)15:14
vponomaryov6) Activation/deactivation api: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/share-network-activation-api15:14
vponomaryov(server) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/71936/15:14
vponomaryov(client) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/71497/15:14
vponomaryovNot tested due to absence of its using in drivers.15:14
*** dripton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:14
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:14
vponomaryovTODO:15:15
bswartzso this reminds me of somethiong15:15
*** lucas_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
bswartzI've decided to create some branches on github under the NetApp account for horizon and tempest15:15
bswartzbecause we have changes to both of those projects that can't go upstream yet15:15
*** gusmaskowitz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
*** gokrokve has quit IRC15:15
bswartzso the NetApp version of those branches will be the "official" ones until we're incubated15:16
bswartzunless someone has a better idea15:16
bswartzif anyone wants to contribue to those branches I can grant access15:16
*** SpamapS_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:16
*** dprince_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:16
bswartzit's just github though so there's no review/gate process and therefore we need to be careful15:16
*** _jmp___ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
vponomaryovbranch per dev15:17
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
bswartzwe need some reviews on the above changes please15:18
bswartzin addition to my own15:18
*** zns has quit IRC15:18
bswartzthe rest I don't know if they need any discussion15:18
bswartzvponomaryov: were you going to mention some todo items?15:18
vponomaryovSo, back to status, TODO:15:19
vponomaryov1) Make drivers (Generic, Cmode) use activation/deactivation API15:19
vponomaryov2) Update Horizon extension for Manila due to API changes, bugfixing15:19
*** SumitNaiksatam_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:19
vponomaryov3) Implement volume types server side15:19
vponomaryovOPEN ITEMS:15:19
*** _jmp___ is now known as _jmp_15:19
vponomaryov1) metadata for security-services.15:19
*** dguitarbite_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:19
vponomaryov2) cirros lightweight image for generic driver :15:20
vponomaryov- has nonworking nfs - https://github.com/csabahenk/cirros/issues?direction=asc15:20
vponomaryovthat's all15:20
*** agingh1pster has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
*** sfineberg_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
bswartzcsaba: you here?15:20
*** annashen- has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:20
*** vipuls has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:21
*** BBG_Stephen is now known as _sbalukoff15:21
bswartzhow much of a blocker is the nonworking NFS is the image? can't we just use other (heavier) images until that's fixed?15:21
*** luqas has quit IRC15:21
*** haleyb has quit IRC15:21
*** dprince has quit IRC15:21
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC15:21
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC15:21
*** jprovazn has quit IRC15:21
*** d0ugal has quit IRC15:21
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC15:21
*** nacim has quit IRC15:21
*** chandankumar_ has quit IRC15:21
*** sfineberg has quit IRC15:21
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC15:21
*** _jmp__ has quit IRC15:21
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC15:21
*** aginghipster has quit IRC15:21
*** annashen_ has quit IRC15:21
*** SpamapS has quit IRC15:21
*** vipul has quit IRC15:21
*** SumitNaiksatam_ is now known as SumitNaiksatam15:21
vponomaryovyes, we can15:21
*** _sbalukoff is now known as sbalukoff15:22
vponomaryovit is blocker for devstack plugin for enabling generic driver15:22
vponomaryovone of two blockers15:22
*** aignatov is now known as aignatov_15:22
vponomaryovsecond, as I have mentioned in dev status is a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/128561215:22
*** funzo has quit IRC15:22
*** funzo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
bswartzuh oh looks like Freenode is still unstable -- I see a netsplit happening15:22
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
bswartzwell in case csaba is reading the meeting log, csaba: reach out for help if you need it15:23
csababswartz: yep15:23
csabajust came soory15:23
*** aignatov_ is now known as aignatov15:24
csabaso yeah I know the image is non functional yet15:24
bswartzvponomaryov: is this really a manila bug or a devstack bug?15:24
*** gusmaskowitz has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:24
vponomaryovit is conceptual bug for dependency, that generic driver has15:25
vponomaryovit is manila bug15:25
bswartzcsaba: welcome!15:25
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:25
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:25
*** hockeynut has quit IRC15:26
bswartzvponomaryov: do you have a fix in mind?15:26
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
vponomaryovWe have thoughts, need test it15:26
bswartzI read the bug and I'm not clear on the problem15:26
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
vponomaryovit will take some time15:26
yportnovabswartz: need to clarify if it is generic driver's bug or bug related to service starting15:26
bswartzokay15:26
csabavponomaryov: can you suggest a hotfix?15:27
csabajust in order to be able to do testing with devstack15:27
vponomaryovthere are workaround15:27
vponomaryovjust run LVM driver first15:27
vponomaryovor cmode15:28
bswartzcan we just hack devstack into working shape manually?15:28
vponomaryovthan enable generic driver and restart m-shr15:28
csabado you need to create an lvm share or is it enough to just start m-shr with lvm ?15:28
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
bswartzok15:28
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
vponomaryovjust start15:28
csabacool15:28
*** chandankumar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
bswartzvponomaryov: you may want to mention that workaround in the bug notes15:29
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
bswartzso people who read it aren't stuck waiting for the bug to be fixed15:29
vponomaryovcurrently, devstack plugin works with lvm15:29
vponomaryovthis bug for commit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74647/15:29
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
vponomaryovthat changes devstack plugin15:29
bswartzok15:30
vponomaryovso, those who don't use this commit, won't face it15:30
csabaand what does lvm driver do to have such an effect?15:30
vponomaryovit has not such dependency, that has generic driver15:31
vponomaryovdependency oh host record15:31
yportnovacsaba: the problem is that generic driver reads on start db record from services table and at that time it is missing. So it fails15:32
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:32
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:32
csabaah so host record in db15:32
csabaI see thx15:32
*** aostapenko has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:32
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs15:32
xyang1vponomaryov: to enable generic driver, just change the driver entry in manila.conf and restart m-shr (after run lvm driver)?15:33
vponomaryovxyang1: no, it has much more dependencies15:33
*** funzo_ is now known as funzo15:33
vponomaryovxyang1: see changes here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74647/15:34
*** michael-yu has quit IRC15:34
xyang1vponomaryov: thanks.  will take a look15:34
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:34
bswartzokay15:34
bswartz#topic open discussion15:34
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: manila)"15:34
bswartzanyone have anything else?15:34
vponomaryovFirst point from open items15:34
vponomaryov1) metadata for security-services.15:34
bswartzokay15:35
vponomaryovno problem if we add it?15:35
bswartzsorry I'm not sure what you mean15:36
bswartzis this something new?15:36
vponomaryovI mean extending manila's API15:36
bswartzthe share-network has all kind of security key/values15:36
vponomaryovto allow set metadata for security services15:36
bswartzwhat would such metadata be used for?15:36
vponomaryovFor example, for kerberos in Cmode driver now we have hardcoded username for spn record - "nfs".15:36
vponomaryovIt can be different for each vserver15:36
vponomaryovtheoreticaly15:37
*** akerr has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:37
bswartzwhy not make that an additional key/value in the share-network?15:37
bswartzwith a sensible default value15:37
vponomaryovit is part of security service, not share-network15:38
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:38
bswartzwhat's a security service?15:38
bswartzI feel like I'm missing something here15:39
vponomaryovsecurity-service, which is part of manla's API15:39
vponomaryovwe set there ldap, ad and kerberos data15:39
*** PeterSchwaller_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:39
vponomaryovthen attach this entities to share-network, that is used to make shares15:39
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:39
*** hockeynut has quit IRC15:40
bswartzokay I feel dumb15:40
*** pdmars has quit IRC15:40
bswartzyes that's right15:40
*** navneet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:40
bswartzI forgot about the exact way the share-network API worked15:40
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:40
bswartzso the proposal is to allow attaching metadata to those security-services?15:41
vponomaryovyes, exactly15:41
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC15:41
bswartzand who would have access to do that?15:41
bswartztenants or admins?15:41
vponomaryovas for creation of sec services - admins15:42
*** rstritt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
vponomaryovif by tenant you mean common users15:43
bswartzI guess my concern is that the term "metadata" typically refers to data that the API server will ignore15:43
vponomaryovyes, it will send as is15:43
vponomaryovkey-value15:43
bswartzif the APIs are looking at the metadata and changing their behavior based on those values then they're not really metadata -- they're API inputs15:43
vponomaryovdrivers can use it15:44
bswartzI think of metadata as stuff the server stores and hands back to you but never really looks at15:44
vponomaryovit depends on realisation15:45
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
vponomaryovmostly yes15:45
bswartzI think the idea makes sense but it can't be called metadata15:46
bswartzit should be called somethign else15:46
bswartzlike attributes15:46
*** samstav has quit IRC15:46
*** ityaptin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
vponomaryovit is expected to be the same as metadta for shares, volumes, etc15:47
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk15:47
bswartzexcept those values are truly metadata aren't they?15:47
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
vponomaryovas rule metadata has one restriction - length15:48
vponomaryovand custom keys with values15:48
bswartzvponomaryov: we should probably follow up on this offline because I want to think through an example in depth15:49
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC15:49
vponomaryovOk, agree, let it left to next meetings15:49
bswartzthx15:49
bswartzdid anyone else have a topic?15:49
bswartzotherwise I'll give you all 10 minutes back and I'll get started on code reviews15:50
bswartzokay15:50
bswartzthanks all15:50
bswartz#endmeeting15:50
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:50
openstackMeeting ended Thu Feb 27 15:50:54 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:50
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-02-27-15.01.html15:50
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-02-27-15.01.txt15:50
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-02-27-15.01.log.html15:50
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs15:52
*** csaba has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
*** glucas has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
*** lucas_ has quit IRC15:57
*** navneet has quit IRC15:59
*** NehaV has quit IRC16:00
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
*** demorris has quit IRC16:03
*** ilyashak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:04
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
*** zhiyan has quit IRC16:09
*** lucas_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:09
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
*** coolsvap has quit IRC16:10
*** zhiyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:11
*** aignatov is now known as aignatov_16:11
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:11
*** eankutse has quit IRC16:12
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
*** sarob has quit IRC16:14
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** markwash has quit IRC16:18
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:19
*** zhiyan has quit IRC16:20
*** alazarev has quit IRC16:21
*** lucas_ has quit IRC16:22
*** lucas_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:27
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:30
*** markwash has quit IRC16:31
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
*** aostapenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:32
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC16:36
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk16:37
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:38
*** markmcclain has quit IRC16:41
*** hockeynut has quit IRC16:41
*** samstav has quit IRC16:43
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:43
*** aignatov_ is now known as aignatov16:43
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC16:48
*** zns has quit IRC16:50
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** d0ugal has quit IRC16:58
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
*** lucas_ has quit IRC16:58
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC16:59
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_17:01
*** demorris has quit IRC17:02
*** ilyashak_ has quit IRC17:02
*** NehaV has quit IRC17:04
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:04
*** lblanchard has quit IRC17:06
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:06
*** mandeep has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
*** mandeep has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
*** jwalls has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
*** SushilKM has quit IRC17:08
*** ftcjeff has quit IRC17:08
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:10
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:11
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC17:12
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs17:12
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:13
*** sarob has quit IRC17:15
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:17
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_17:17
*** jjmb has quit IRC17:18
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
*** caleb_ has quit IRC17:30
*** hockeynut has quit IRC17:30
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC17:31
*** samstav has quit IRC17:31
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
*** aignatov is now known as aignatov_17:35
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC17:37
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann17:39
*** themistymay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:39
*** julienvey has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:41
*** sriram has quit IRC17:41
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:41
*** gokrokve has quit IRC17:41
*** zns has quit IRC17:43
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC17:45
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:45
*** eankutse has quit IRC17:45
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk17:46
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:46
*** derekh has quit IRC17:46
*** SpamapS_ is now known as SpamapS17:48
*** SpamapS has quit IRC17:48
*** SpamapS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:48
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** ylobankov1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC17:57
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** aignatov_ is now known as aignatov17:57
*** dmitryme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** tmckay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
*** crobertsrh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
SergeyLukjanovping savanna folks18:00
tmckayhey there18:00
ErikBHello18:00
alazarevo/18:00
aignatovo/18:01
crobertsrhhi18:01
dmitrymepong18:01
SergeyLukjanovhey folks, let's start18:01
SergeyLukjanov#startmeeting savanna18:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Feb 27 18:01:50 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SergeyLukjanov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:01
ylobankov1hello18:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'savanna'18:01
SergeyLukjanov#info https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda18:02
themistymayhi18:02
SergeyLukjanov#topic News / updates18:02
*** openstack changes topic to "News / updates (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:02
SergeyLukjanovfolks, please18:02
SergeyLukjanovthemistymay, hey18:02
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
SergeyLukjanov#info 5 new name candidates are under lawyers review, results should be available in a few days18:03
ErikBWe've had a slow week. Working on [Ambari] Blueprints mostly.18:03
SergeyLukjanov#info client 0.5.0 was released few days ago with update auth, entrypoint code and CLI18:03
aignatovErikB: it seems there are a lot of questions about proper images of hdp18:03
crobertsrhDashboard bug fixing for me.  Then I should probably make a loop through roadmap/blueprints and see if there are any dashboard items that need to be added.18:03
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC18:03
aignatovcould you or jspiedel update the docs?18:03
alazarevnaive attempt to refactor plugin SPI and EDP failed, doing it by small pieces now18:04
ylobankov1I am working on adding test for transient cluster18:04
dmitrymeI am pushing my agent changes through your review guys ;-)18:04
themistymayStill reading into code, trying to get acclimated.  Picking up tasks where I can, low-hanging fruit mostly.18:04
themistymayAlso working to resync oslo-incubator code18:05
alazarevEDP on IDH 3.0.2 works in my env, we commit soon18:05
ErikBaignatov, RE images, yes we will be taking a deep look at these issues to ensure that the images are ok. Likely next week.18:05
aignatovI was mostly working on the savanna in heat, resolved some comments from heat team, also some savannaclient/dashboard manipulation with new release of client )18:05
aignatov:)18:05
aignatovErikB: great, thx!18:05
*** arborism has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
*** arborism is now known as amcrn18:05
tmckayI've been working on savanna cli integration tests.  Not currently the openstack convention, but important for our typical end users.  And, I found bugs in the cli before 0.5.0 using it :)  I'll publish very soon (today/tomorrow)18:05
sreshetnyakI am working on hadoop 218:05
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, we'll have code freeze Mar 418:06
aignatovhadoop 2 in vanilla sreshetnyak meant :)18:06
SergeyLukjanovand feature freeze right after the i318:06
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, are you expect to complete your refactoring18:06
*** michael-yu has quit IRC18:06
SergeyLukjanov?18:06
sreshetnyakbasic prototype on review18:06
*** srao93 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
aignatovSergeyLukjanov: refactoring of what?18:06
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, I mean alazarev18:07
aignatovok18:07
SergeyLukjanova + <TAB> :)18:07
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: I'm ok with that18:07
*** PeterSchwaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:07
*** Duane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: not sure if all refactoring is done, anyway it is just "for developers", can always commit in J18:08
aignatovso we should define which features will be landed in icehouse, should not it?18:08
*** PeterSchwaller_ has quit IRC18:08
*** jgallard has quit IRC18:08
aignatovand which are not18:08
*** bob_nettleton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: is -> will be18:08
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, I'm ok with landing rest Hadoop 2 support patches18:09
SergeyLukjanovbut I hope that the main code for them will be landed before the FF18:09
aignatovso, it's ok to have feature freeze exception and push commits after March 418:09
alazarevmore news: bug in swift hadoop driver was found and fixed (https://bugs.launchpad.net/savanna/+bug/1284906)18:09
aignatovMarch 4 is the next week :)18:10
SergeyLukjanovit's ok to have FFEs for self-containing patches18:10
SergeyLukjanovlike work on plugin v2 internals18:11
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: with the current speed I'm now sure that IDH 3.0.2 will be merged before Mar 418:11
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:11
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, hm18:11
aignatovalso EDP + Hadoop 2 in all plugins I think should be part of the icehouse18:11
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, IIRC version selection mechanism is on review or already landed?18:11
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja18:12
aignatovIIRC? :)18:12
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:12
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73087/ started at Feb 12 and it is still on review18:12
SergeyLukjanovif I recall correctly == IIRC18:13
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, ok, added to my backlog18:13
SergeyLukjanovand what's about the same change for vanilla plugin?18:13
SergeyLukjanovaignatov?18:13
*** nacim has quit IRC18:14
SergeyLukjanovmm, it's merged already as I see18:14
SergeyLukjanovhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/74145/18:14
aignatovSergeyLukjanov: what was the question on m?18:15
SergeyLukjanovI think https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73087/ will be merged before March 418:15
aignatov*me18:15
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, about versoins support for vanilla, but I've alreadybanswered18:15
aignatovok18:15
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, alazarev, are you expecting any changes in non-plugin code?18:16
SergeyLukjanovfor EDP support for example?18:16
SergeyLukjanovexcept patches that are currently under review18:16
*** sarob has quit IRC18:16
aignatovyep, we had a conversation with alazarev today and agreed to make EDP part more imdepennded from plugin18:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
aignatove. g. remove hive-plugin dependencies from edp stuff18:17
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: I want to have https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73713/ merged, but I'm Ok to leave it to J18:17
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, if it'll not be merged before the March 4, I prefer to postpone it to J18:17
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:18
SergeyLukjanovI think that all core code changes should posponed to J if it'll not be merged before the March 418:18
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: and to make it merged I'm going to remove EDP dependency on Hive18:18
SergeyLukjanovthe only exception - impossibility to enable EDP for plugins18:18
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: agree18:18
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, btw https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73713/ should be rebased18:19
SergeyLukjanovok, let's move on18:20
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: I know, I agree with Mett's comments that extending plugin SPI is not good in that case and EDP usage need to be cleaned first18:20
SergeyLukjanovnote: master will be opened for J dev. around the rc1 (end of March)18:20
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:20
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, ok, good18:21
*** sarob has quit IRC18:21
SergeyLukjanovit's a good topic to discuss on summit - how edp should work now18:21
SergeyLukjanovand in future18:21
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: agree18:22
SergeyLukjanovaand we already should be under the "Icehouse-3 status" topic :)18:22
SergeyLukjanov#topic Icehouse-3 status18:22
*** openstack changes topic to "Icehouse-3 status (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:22
SergeyLukjanovany questions on this topic?18:22
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: I have several thoughts about this, I don't like how EDP is organized now18:22
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
ErikBalazarev: +118:23
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: this is regarding EDP, now i318:23
alazarev*not i318:23
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, yup18:23
SergeyLukjanovanyway, we should re-work it, at least due to the intention to support not only oozie for running jobs :)18:23
SergeyLukjanovspark, storm, anything else....18:23
SergeyLukjanova big topic for summit18:24
SergeyLukjanovand I prefer to not hurry now on trying cleanup stuff in edp18:24
SergeyLukjanovwe have not enough time to discuss it good18:24
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: local improvements are good18:25
ErikBwe need to discuss integrating with Falcon & Flume IMO18:26
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, we have a few days to make them18:26
SergeyLukjanovErikB, I think that we'll have much more slots on this summit to discuss our EDP stuff18:26
SergeyLukjanovI think -> I know18:27
*** xyang1 has quit IRC18:27
SergeyLukjanovanything else?18:27
aignatovErikB: good point for discussions, SergeyLukjanov, we have to think about more slots for EDP topics in design tracks :)18:27
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, sure18:28
SergeyLukjanov#topic Project naming collision18:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Project naming collision (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:28
SergeyLukjanov#info latest update - candidates are under review18:28
SergeyLukjanovand we should rename before I release18:28
SergeyLukjanov#info we should rename before I release18:28
SergeyLukjanovso, the best time is March 6 - March 27 time range18:29
SergeyLukjanovit's a three weeks between i3 and first rc18:29
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: is it Ok to have renaming after FF?18:29
*** shakayumi has quit IRC18:29
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
SergeyLukjanovit'll guarantee that we'll have no breaking changes18:30
*** gokrokve has quit IRC18:30
SergeyLukjanovand there are no more options18:30
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
*** shakayumi has quit IRC18:30
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC18:30
SergeyLukjanovit's better than rename after rc18:30
SergeyLukjanov:(18:30
SergeyLukjanovprobably, we'll postpone rc1 for one more week18:31
SergeyLukjanovto have 1w of code freeze to move the stuff18:31
*** krtaylor has quit IRC18:32
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:32
SergeyLukjanovI think that renaming will take about 4-5 days (Friday - Tuesday)18:32
SergeyLukjanovwe have integration tests, it'll help a lot18:32
tmckayI think once we have the 5 candidates back, we can vote very quickly.  I think 24-36 hours ought to be enough.  Too quick?18:33
*** markwash has quit IRC18:33
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, I mean that process of renaming repos, and s/savanna/xxx/ code18:33
tmckayno integration tests for docs, though.  ;-)18:33
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, for docs it'll be just replace18:33
tmckaySergeyLukjanov, yes, I meant that the quicker we vote, the quicker we can be done with the move18:33
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, exactly18:34
SergeyLukjanovso, I'd like to raise the following question18:34
SergeyLukjanovhow to change the final name?18:34
aignatovSergeyLukjanov: is there ETA for the lawyers results?18:34
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, they said we need a week, it was last friday18:34
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:35
SergeyLukjanovwe'll not wait for the next meeting anyway, so, I'd like to discuss provess today18:35
SergeyLukjanovprocess*18:35
tmckayoh man, we even have to change the swift://container.savanna/ pattern, which technically means a databasea migration script18:35
SergeyLukjanovthe only exception if we'll have a huge disagreement on final name18:35
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, it could be done after the main renaming18:35
aignatovtmckay: yes, and this has to be tested carefully18:36
SergeyLukjanovneutron is still contains some quantum refs in code :)18:36
tmckayheh18:36
SergeyLukjanovit'll be very difficult, but it's possible18:36
aignatovalso we should replace all images and link to the images18:36
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:36
SergeyLukjanovaignatov, yup18:37
dmitrymeI think 'grep -i savanna' will find 99% of what we need to rename18:37
tmckayI wonder if we can extend pep8 with a "no savanna" rule18:37
tmckayto bar it at the gate18:37
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, good idea :)18:37
dmitrymetmckay: I don't think it is needed, it is a one time change18:37
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:37
tmckaydmitryme, someone might forget :)  Like still writing 201318:38
SergeyLukjanovlet's presume that we'll have N=0...5 options for the new name, do we need to vote for them one more time? (we already have a sorted list)18:38
dmitrymeSergeyLukjanov: I think yes18:38
tmckayI think I would vote again.  But a quick one18:38
alazarevtmckay: and savanna-db:// and many other cases we don't remember right now18:38
tmckayack18:38
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:39
SergeyLukjanovI've created an etherpad http://etherpad.openstack.org/p/savanna-renaming-process for sharing ideas about what should be renamed in savanna18:39
tmckaystackadoop-db:// would have been great18:39
*** michael-yu has quit IRC18:39
alazarevSergeyLukjanov: I think vote is good, current list is not relevant since voters needed to sort 10+ options and a lot of votes are with places 1,2,3,26,26,26,...18:40
tmckayagree with alazarev18:41
*** saju_m has quit IRC18:41
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:41
*** d0ugal has quit IRC18:41
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:41
aignatov+118:41
SergeyLukjanovbtw I'm agree with too, just like to see your thoughts18:41
*** bdpayne has quit IRC18:41
alazarevshould we replace everything savanna related before I?18:42
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, it'll be the best case18:42
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC18:42
SergeyLukjanovalazarev, I think that there not so many places where it'll be difficult to do18:42
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
tmckayooo, SergeyLukjanov, what about summit names?18:42
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, talks titles?18:43
tmckayWe have a project with a new name, but summit slots with the old one18:43
tmckayYes18:43
tmckayCan those be changed?18:43
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC18:43
SergeyLukjanovsure18:43
SergeyLukjanovI'll ask folks to update them when we'll know the new name18:43
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** markwash has quit IRC18:44
*** vkmc has quit IRC18:44
*** hockeynut has quit IRC18:44
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
SergeyLukjanovre migrations - probably we'll just merge our migrations to only one "icehouse" migration18:44
SergeyLukjanovshould be discussed18:45
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:45
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:45
*** NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov18:45
SergeyLukjanovhow much time should we have for voting for the final name?18:45
SergeyLukjanovtmckay, alazarev , aignatov ErikB18:46
tmckay1-2 business days18:46
SergeyLukjanov++18:46
themistymay+118:46
dmitryme+18:46
alazarev+1 on 2 days18:46
crobertsrh2 should be plenty.  +118:46
aignatovand 1-2 weekends xD18:46
SergeyLukjanovthe best case is to have new name selected till the next weekend18:47
*** sarob has quit IRC18:47
ErikB+118:47
aignatov+! for me as well18:47
aignatov+118:47
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:48
SergeyLukjanovthan we'll be able to finish renaming till the March 1818:48
SergeyLukjanovand have one month before the Icehouse18:48
*** sarob_ has quit IRC18:48
*** songole has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
SergeyLukjanovthat could be postponed in worst case too18:49
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:50
*** shakayumi has quit IRC18:50
*** demorris has quit IRC18:50
SergeyLukjanovI'll try to find neutron's check list18:50
SergeyLukjanovIIRC they had one18:51
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:51
*** shakayumi has quit IRC18:51
SergeyLukjanov#agreed setup final voting for 2 business days18:51
*** hemanthravi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:51
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:51
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:51
SergeyLukjanovI hope we'll not have any disagreements on new name18:52
SergeyLukjanovheh18:52
*** shakayumi has quit IRC18:52
SergeyLukjanovmany of external folks mentioned that gravity is quite overloaded :(18:52
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:52
*** shakayumi has quit IRC18:53
SergeyLukjanovbut I still think that it's ok if lawyers ok with it18:53
SergeyLukjanov#topic Open discussion18:53
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: savanna)"18:53
dmitrymeSergey: But OpenStack Gravity is not18:53
SergeyLukjanov7 mins left18:53
SergeyLukjanovdmitryme, sure, that's why I'm still +1 gravity18:53
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:53
aignatov+1 for gravity as well18:54
themistymaygravity well :P18:54
tmckaynot time to vote yet ;-)18:54
toskyquick question (hi, I'm a RH QE, still learning here): I've seen the email about "Savanna graduation status", is Icehouse the target for being out of incubation?18:54
*** sriram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
aignatovcrobertsrh: how is your results of the curling tournament?18:54
tmckayhi tosky18:54
aignatovwill you play on the next olympics 2018? ;)18:54
crobertsrhaignatov:  We won our last 4 games to finish in 5th place, just missing the medal round.18:54
SergeyLukjanovtosky, yup, we'd like to be integrated in J18:55
crobertsrhOlympics is unlikely, but I do know both our men's and women's Olympic curling teams...even played against them before.18:55
aignatovreally? you won?18:55
dmitrymecrobertsrh: ah, too bad you've missed the medal round18:55
toskySergeyLukjanov: ehm, so Icehouse or Juno?18:55
SergeyLukjanovtosky, heh bad wording18:55
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
crobertsrhI have beaten one of our olympians....not playing with her usual team though.18:56
SergeyLukjanovtosky, we'd like to graduate from the incubation in March to be integrated project starting from J (inlusively)18:56
*** sriram has quit IRC18:56
*** sriram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
toskySergeyLukjanov: thanks, so for Icehouse the project will be in a kind of limbo out of incubation but not fully integrated yet?18:57
* tosky does not know the workflow18:57
*** mandeep has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
aignatovcrobertsrh: but will you plan to play in the next tournaments? will it in the next year or earlier?18:57
*** prasadv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
SergeyLukjanovtosky, sounds like that18:57
toskyoki, thanks again18:58
crobertsrhI am actually going to take a bit of a break from competitive curling (2nd baby is on the way).  I will still play, but just at smaller tournaments.18:58
SergeyLukjanovtosky, if we' graduate in March than we'll be part of integrated Juno release18:58
SergeyLukjanov1 min left18:58
SergeyLukjanovthank you all!18:59
SergeyLukjanov#endmeeting18:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:59
openstackMeeting ended Thu Feb 27 18:59:31 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2014/savanna.2014-02-27-18.01.html18:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2014/savanna.2014-02-27-18.01.txt18:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2014/savanna.2014-02-27-18.01.log.html18:59
mesteryGroup Policy peeps: Yo!18:59
*** crobertsrh has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** thinrichs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** kanzhe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
mestery#startmeeting networking_policy19:00
hemanthravihi19:00
banixhi19:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Feb 27 19:00:08 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mestery. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:00
thinrichsHi19:00
cgoncalvesHowdy!19:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'19:00
kevinbentonhello!19:00
mesteryHi folks!19:00
*** tmckay has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** bob_nettleton has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** themistymay has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
prasadvhi19:00
banixmestery: hi19:00
mandeepmestery: hi19:00
mestery#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron_Group_Policy Agenda19:01
marunhi19:01
*** khyati_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
mesterySumitNaiksatam rkukura: Ping19:01
SumitNaiksatammestery: pong19:01
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** drake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** dmitryme has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
* mestery realizes rkukura isn't online at the moment.19:01
SumitNaiksatamhi all!19:01
SumitNaiksatamsorry lost track of time19:01
s3wongHello19:01
mesteryOK, lets get started, we have a big agenda this week.19:01
songoleHi19:01
mestery#topic Action Item Review19:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Action Item Review (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:02
mesterybanix: Thanks for pushing the DB code out for review to the shared github!19:02
banixmestery: It needs more work...19:02
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
mesterybanix: I saw the code is on a branch on the shared github, can you sahre the link here in the meeting?19:02
banixand it is under ml2 right now but we can move as needed19:03
mesterybanix: Thanks!19:03
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
mesterybanix: We can talk more about the code in the Data Model section of the meeting as well.19:03
mestery#topic Plugin Structure19:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Plugin Structure (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:03
mesterySumitNaiksatam mandeep: Did one of you guys want to lead this section?19:03
*** ylobankov1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: sure19:03
banixhttps://github.com/noironetworks/neutron-group-policy/blob/banix/db/neutron/plugins/ml2/models_gp.py19:04
*** alazarev has quit IRC19:04
mandeepMy understanding from the last meeting was the we agreed that this will be a new plug-in19:04
mandeepAnd that for PoC/Juno we will make it a new core plugin19:04
mandeepIf we agree with that, we can proceed to the next topoc19:04
*** NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_19:04
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:05
SumitNaiksatammandeep: yes, to satisfy the requirements we currently have this will need to be "configured" as a core plugin19:05
mandeep(we will revisit is post Juno to see how we can refactor it)19:05
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: Yes19:05
SumitNaiksatammandeep: however we can always build this as nicely separated functional blocks19:05
mesteryAny questions on this from anyone?19:05
*** arnaud is now known as arnaud|afk19:05
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: agreed. Let's make it core for now19:06
mesterySumitNaiksatam: ^^^^ That right there. :)19:06
SumitNaiksatammandeep: so we can reuse most of what we are doing now if we decide to change course19:06
mandeepYes, that is the plan.19:06
banixSounds good; When we get to coding we will know more about issues that ay be there ...19:06
SumitNaiksatambanix: precisely19:06
SumitNaiksatammestery: so i will take a crack at getting this going19:07
mandeepmestery: I think we have agreement of this and we get started19:07
SumitNaiksatammandeep: ^^^ :-)19:07
mestery#info Group Policy will be implemented as a new core plugin for Juno timeframe.19:07
mesteryOK, lets move on.19:07
mestery#topic Data Model19:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Data Model (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:07
SumitNaiksatams3wong: sorry did not mean to talk over you, i agree19:07
mesterybanix: This relates to your code you pushed I think.19:08
banixJust before we move on,I am a bit slow today19:08
banixmore than my usual slow sef19:08
mestery#undo19:08
openstackRemoving item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Topic object at 0x2c62b10>19:08
mesterybanix: No worries. :)19:08
banixSo this plugin will be supporting the group policy extension. right?19:09
SumitNaiksatambanix: yes19:09
mandeepbanix: yes19:09
banixthere won't be any easy way for other plugins rouse the implementation in the short term. is that correct?19:09
SumitNaiksatambanix: why not?19:09
SumitNaiksatambanix: the implementation of the group policy extension has multiple aspects19:10
mandeepbanix: Existing plugins will be used to "implement" policy using existing API19:10
hemanthraviwill we have 2 plugins the core plugin and a group-policy plugin (like the service plugins)19:10
SumitNaiksatambanix: firstly for the db part we can have a mixin (in line with what we are doing with all other extensions)19:10
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: no19:10
*** yaroslavLobanko1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
hemanthravithe core plugin will impl the group-policy apis?19:11
*** eankutse has quit IRC19:11
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: for the group policy extensions we will implement the db model in a mixin19:11
*** srao93 has quit IRC19:11
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
maruni'm not sure I understand why a core plugin is necessary19:11
hemanthraviok, got it19:11
SumitNaiksatamhemanthravi: any other monolithic plugins wishing you implement group policy extensions can also inherit from that19:11
marunand what would it be targeting?19:11
banixSumitNaiksatam: So you are suggesting the implementation will be such that other plugins could ruse the group policy code19:11
SumitNaiksatamyou -> to19:12
SumitNaiksatambanix: yes, that will be a design goal19:12
SumitNaiksatambanix: to the extent possible19:12
*** caleb_ has quit IRC19:12
SumitNaiksatambanix: some specific aspects of policy rendering will obviously be specific to the reference implementation19:13
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
marunis the idea for a core plugin to be like ml2 - a framework for adding support for various implementations?19:13
*** pdmars has quit IRC19:13
SumitNaiksatammarun: we would need to explore that19:13
SumitNaiksatammarun: we could potentially have southbound plugin drivers19:14
banixSo if we ignore the conflict that the core API may produce with the extension, we could reuse the extension code in another core plugin19:14
*** yaroslavLobanko1 is now known as yroslavLobankov19:14
SumitNaiksatambanix: yes on that latter, but i could not understand the conflict with the core API part19:14
marunSumitNaiksatam: I can see a case for that, so long as the implementation is abstracted from the api to allow both core api and extension api to target the same backend19:14
*** yroslavLobankov has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:15
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: I agree19:15
s3wongmarun: I think that would be the goal19:15
SumitNaiksatammarun: yeah, we would probably need to iterate a bit to get it right (or validate that its the right approach)19:15
*** krtaylor has quit IRC19:15
SumitNaiksatammarun: gerrit reviews will help :-)19:15
mestery+1 to that marun19:16
marunSumitNaiksatam: I think it's the right approach regardless.  Designing something that can be used without the api is essential to focused testing.19:16
SumitNaiksatami mean reviewer feedback19:16
marunSumitNaiksatam: (most code in the tree fails this smell test)19:16
SumitNaiksatammarun: definitely agree19:16
banixSumitNaiksatam: core API may imply certain connectivity that may be in conflict with the policies being applied. I thought that was one of the issues. I may have misunderstood19:16
SumitNaiksatambanix: its not so much the API19:16
banixright19:17
banixnot the API19:17
mandeepbanix: That is correct. But if a core plugin decides to implement the policy extensiosn, that plugin will have to resolve the same issues19:17
SumitNaiksatambanix: its more the neutron plugin configuration model that would lend itself to more than one point of management of the neutron core resources if we don't have a core plugin19:17
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:17
banixSumitNaiksatam: makes sense.19:17
banixthat is what I meant19:18
mesteryCool. So I think we're all in agreement here on the new core plugin then?19:18
SumitNaiksatambanix: ok cool19:18
banixyes, with the goals specified above.19:18
mesterybanix: great!19:18
*** lblanchard has quit IRC19:19
mesteryOK, shall we move on then?19:19
banixyes on my end...19:19
mestery#topic Data Model19:19
*** openstack changes topic to "Data Model (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:19
mesteryOK, we wanted to discuss this from the angle of the original document.19:19
s3wongOK19:20
mesteryI think mandeep had some comments here.19:20
mandeepYes, I has a few questions regarding where we were w.r.t to the contarct model19:20
mandeepI understand that the policy currently implemented is essentially a policy on logical links (that is between connectivity groups)19:21
banixthere are no contracts in the model we agreed on.19:21
mandeepThat, IMO, loses a lot of the power that comes with a contarct based model19:21
SumitNaiksatammandeep: i think we need to strive to be more declarative19:21
mandeep(as discusses in the first part of the model section in the blueprint)19:21
mesteryYes: The contract model is in the original design document.19:22
mandeepIdeally we want a declarative policy model that allows for late binding and devops type of automations19:22
SumitNaiksatammestery: firstly, i would like to hear from the team here, if we all agree that we want a declarative model19:22
prasadvit seems like contract model is more generic than the connectivity model19:22
mandeepprasadv: Exactly19:23
SumitNaiksatammestery: the rest of the discussion might flow from that19:23
s3wongI remember the model changed when we moved into the src-dst group list model19:23
mesteryprasadv: Yes, and the document has both models in it as well.19:23
*** aignatov is now known as aignatov_19:23
mesterySumitNaiksatam: Agreed19:23
prasadvsumitNaiksatam: yes19:23
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:23
SumitNaiksatambanix: do you agree?19:23
SumitNaiksatambanix: declarative model goal?19:23
banixsure19:23
mandeepbanix: Great19:24
SumitNaiksatambanix: cool19:24
SumitNaiksatamso no objections19:24
songoleI like it better. what are the consequences of the change?19:24
SumitNaiksatamso in that context, i think in the current model in the latter part of the document we are confusing the implementation with the tenant facing abstractions19:24
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC19:24
mandeepShould a "service provider" be able to define it's policies independent is it's user (which can be determined in a different workflow)19:24
SumitNaiksatami think from a user perspective you only want to declare the following:19:25
*** zhiyan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:25
mesterySumitNaiksatam: That's entirally possible, I struggled with that, and in fact for the Use Cases I have a comment to that effect there :)19:25
SumitNaiksatammy endpoint group provides the following contract19:25
SumitNaiksatamor, my endpoint group consumes the following contract19:25
mandeepsongole: The current model couples defining policy from a providers perspective with it's binding to a specific usage19:26
SumitNaiksatamnow the underlying implementation renders the policy on the link that ties the two endpoint groups together19:26
SumitNaiksatamso far make sense to everyone?19:26
thinrichsSorry--missed what the "contract" bit is.  Example?19:26
banixSumitNaiksatam: that is reasonable but some may find the other model easier to understand… Mandeep was saying the opposite…19:27
banixI thought we agreed that at the end of he day the two models can be converted to each other easily19:27
SumitNaiksatambanix: all that i am saying is that we expose the provider/consumer contracts to the end user19:27
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: correct. We were operating on a provider/consumer model for a long time in the beginning19:27
SumitNaiksatameach contracts is a collection of policies19:27
mesterySumitNaiksatam: Yes, that.19:28
SumitNaiksatam*contract19:28
mandeepAt least, from the way SumitNaiksatam explained it, I see the link based rendering "assembly" for a "higher level" contracts and bindings specified independenly19:28
SumitNaiksatamthe underlying implementation matches the provider contract to the consumer contract19:28
banixSumit, exploring is fine but that will require changes in the object model, API, ...19:28
thinrichsSo we'd say something like… group A of endpoints allows incoming HTTP requests on port 80?19:28
SumitNaiksatamthinrichs: thats correct19:29
SumitNaiksatamthinrichs: via a contract19:29
SumitNaiksatambanix: changes are not that much19:29
prasadvsumitNaiksatam: the binding happens when consumer wants to connect to producer right?19:29
SumitNaiksatambanix: will take crack at this and something your way19:29
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: yes19:29
thinrichsAny way to stop traffic originating on port 80 from group A and ending at port 81 in group B but allow all other traffic?19:29
mandeepthinrichs: A contract is logically corelated set of policies that are provided by a service19:30
mandeepprasadv: Correct19:30
thinrichsmandeep: understood--I was asking if that model is expressive enough to do what we want.19:30
mandeepthinrichs: My claim is that the current model is not (and does not even represent that yet)19:30
thinrichsmandeep: you're saying that my second example is inexpressible in the version where we attach policy to 2 groups?19:31
mandeepAnd in expressiveness this become a real concern - let us take a use-case:19:31
mandeepSay I am a provider of services to multiple tenants which has a set of policies A applied to it19:32
hemanthravithinrichs: that should still work, the contract/policy can define that..allow incoming to 80 from 8119:32
thinrichshemanthravi: agreed.19:32
mandeepLet me say that I have a 1000 users of this policy19:32
hemanthravigroup a provides it...and group b uses that contract19:32
mandeepAnd now, I find a new security issue and want to update my contract from policies A to A'19:33
*** kevinconway has quit IRC19:33
mandeepIn a contract base model, I just update my contract and the underlying implementation translates it to 1000 x links19:33
thinrichsmandeep: I can see that there are things you might want to say when we attach policy to group A that we can't say if we are forced to attach policy to 2 groups (without copying that policy and applying to all pairs A, A').19:33
thinrichsmandeep: understood.19:34
mandeepIn the current case, the admin will have to know where these policies are used and chnage them one by ine19:34
hemanthraviwill it also lend to discovery/directory of contracts...19:34
hemanthravithat consumers could use19:34
thinrichsPerhaps we've identified use cases for both the 1-group and 2-group style of policies.  Didn't we think we could express the 1-group version with the 2-group version?19:34
mandeepthinrichs: That is a different - and important - use case that a contarct can express more succiently19:34
*** kebray has quit IRC19:35
thinrichsmandeep: Understood.  And I think it's more than just about succinctness.19:35
*** saju_m has quit IRC19:35
mandeephemanthravi: Precisely, this now separates the provider workflow from the consumer workflow. And that allows creation of directory/brokers/marketplace19:35
thinrichsThe 1-group model will apply not only to all the groups that currently exist but also all the groups that will ever be created.19:35
mandeepthinrichs: I agree. I was over simplifying it.19:36
thinrichsIn the 2-group model, we can't apply policy to every group that will ever be created in the future.19:36
mandeepthinrichs: That was what I meant by the "late binding" comment that I made earlier.19:37
banixmandeep, you may need to specify more information on a contract to differentiate among consumers…. when you do that you are close to the other model19:37
marunmandeep: when you say directory/broker/marketplace, i hear 'we're off in the weeds'19:37
SumitNaiksatamthinrichs: if we introduce reflexive association for endpoint groups we can possible achieve that19:37
thinrichsSo it seems we were wrong previously in thinking that the 2-group model is sufficient to encode the 1-group model.19:37
mandeepbanix: That can be handled in the contacts by using labels (for example)19:37
SumitNaiksatambanix: yes that can be encoded in the contracts19:37
mandeepmarun: Can you be more specific?19:37
banixpolicies across tenants, the consumer/producer model is better19:38
thinrichsSumitNaiksatam: there are certainly things we could do to increase the expressiveness model, e.g. make groups a test in the condition of the policy statements, instead of a thing we create via the API.19:38
banixotherwise with labels we get back to something close to the other model19:38
banixso regardless of the merits of the two models19:38
banixthe current object model is supposed to work for both19:39
banixisn't that what we worked out early on?19:39
mandeepbanix: No, it allows a provider to provide a "red contarct" and a "green contarct" that any consumer can use later19:39
SumitNaiksatamthinrichs: agree (assuming i understood what you just said ;-))19:39
thinrichsSumitNaiksatam: :)19:39
banixman deep, couldn't that be expressed by defining plicies for a single group?19:40
mandeepbanix: In general, we can always represent the link based model in this way, so it is a superset that allows for useful operation models19:40
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:40
banixsorry misspelled19:40
prasadvbanix: with labels, it seems like the producer is advertising how to access what it is serving and consumer attaches to it right. when consumer epxresses to attach then they are bound like the other model19:40
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs19:40
mandeepbanix: Except that it can be done in advanced and published. The users can bind later19:41
banixprasadv: right19:41
SumitNaiksatamto thinrichs's point we can make this model more expressive as we go along19:41
SumitNaiksatamthe contract allows us the footprint to do that19:41
mesteryFolks, just a time check: We only have 20 minutes left here.19:41
prasadvalso labels is one way to do it. based on what is on the rules, it could be other matches19:41
mandeepbanix: Also, we can update contracts later much more easily19:41
banixSO I guess my question is what do we need to add to the model we currently have at the end of the google doc19:42
mesteryThe thing we wanted to get across here was adding contracts into the Object Model.19:42
SumitNaiksatamit might be difficult for people to digest everything in the first shot19:42
mesterymandeep SumitNaiksatam: Correct me if I've oversimplified there :)19:42
banixshall we work that out and discuss again?19:42
SumitNaiksatamlets start with the contracts defintion19:42
SumitNaiksatammestery: yeah agree19:42
mesterySo, I think we're all in agreement on adding contracts into the Object Model right?19:42
mandeepmestery: I agree. We wil have to uodate the doc to explain this discussion19:42
mandeepmestery: Right19:42
mesteryI just think we're wandering into the weeds in this meeting a bit :)19:43
hemanthraviagreed19:43
SumitNaiksatamcontract will look very similary to the existing policy, the difference is in the relationships19:43
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC19:43
SumitNaiksatam*simlar19:43
mesterySo, lets put a stake in the ground on contracts being added in.19:43
mesteryYes19:43
SumitNaiksatamdamn invented a new word19:43
mesteryYHa!19:43
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:43
mandeepmestery: agreed19:43
s3wongmestery: agreed19:43
mesteryCool.19:43
prasadvmestery, sumitnaiksatam: best to put in document and discuss19:44
mestery#info Group Policy Team to look at adding contracts into Object Model.19:44
mesteryprasadv: Agreed.19:44
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: sure, yes19:44
banixCan you guys work out the description and update the doc so we can discuss next time19:44
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: wanted to discuss here before we did that19:44
mesteryWho wants to add that into the doc? SumitNaiksatam? mandeep? prasadv?19:44
mandeepbanix: OK19:44
SumitNaiksatambanix: yes definitely19:44
SumitNaiksatammestery: yeah19:44
* mestery waits to hand out an action item19:44
s3wongbanix: yes, I think doing this in doc is definitely necessary19:44
mesterySumitNaiksatam: Sold!19:44
mestery;)_19:44
mestery#action SumitNaiksatam to update doc with contracts in object model19:45
SumitNaiksatammestery: of damn, i was just agreeing with you19:45
mesteryha!19:45
mestery:)19:45
SumitNaiksatam*oh19:45
prasadvsumitnaiksatam: let me know if you want help there19:45
mesteryprasadv: Nice, thanks!19:45
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: yes, absolutely, lets do it collaboratively19:45
mesteryOK, 15 minutes left, should we move to the next topic?19:45
mestery#undo19:45
openstackRemoving item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Action object at 0x2d0a710>19:45
s3wongwe may want to run some use cases against the new model as well19:45
mestery#action SumitNaiksatam and prasadv to update document to add contracts to Object Model19:45
mandeeps3wong: Yes, that is critical19:45
mesterys3wong: Good idea19:45
mestery#topic Policy API19:46
*** openstack changes topic to "Policy API (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:46
SumitNaiksatamwe will have banix watch over our shoulder ;)19:46
mesterySumitNaiksatam: Did you want to cover this?19:46
s3wongoh well, with the new model, APIs would need to change19:46
banix:)19:46
SumitNaiksatammestery: yeah, i did not touch anything since yesterday19:46
SumitNaiksatammestery: s3wong and i met19:46
SumitNaiksatammestery: we thought we would hold off19:46
SumitNaiksatammestery: so not for lack of effort ;-)19:46
mesteryHa! :)19:47
mesteryCool.19:47
s3wongyeah, no point to submit the API code if we have changes on the horizon19:47
mesteryAny questions on the API SumitNaiksatam and s3wong published last week?19:47
SumitNaiksatammestery: lets punt this item to the next week19:47
SumitNaiksatammestery: we will make progress19:47
SumitNaiksatammestery: better discussed in the context of today's discussion19:47
mesteryOK, sounds good. Thanks SumitNaiksatam.19:47
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: +119:48
mestery#topic Open Issues/Discussion19:48
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Issues/Discussion (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:48
SumitNaiksatammestery: oh but one thing, if there are any suggestions on testing, etc, please let us know19:48
s3wongand we will need to update the APIs according to the new model, if and when it is agreed upon by everyone19:48
mesterys3wong: Yes19:48
banixyes we should postpone that discussion19:48
SumitNaiksatamtesting -> UTs19:48
banixs3wong: that's what i meant19:48
marunSumitNaiksatam: On the topic of testing, I have a review that demonstrates a retargetable unit test: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72585/19:48
s3wongbanix: sure :-)19:48
SumitNaiksatammarun: thanks much, will take a look19:49
marunSumitNaiksatam: the idea is to write functional tests that can target a plugin's api directly, but can also target a deployed instance using tempest19:49
cgoncalvesmestery: you did not refresh the group policy meeting page since ~1 hour, yes? :)19:49
marunSumitNaiksatam: It offers the promise of only having to write api tests once, have those tests exist in the neutron tree, but be able to target running deployments.19:49
SumitNaiksatammarun: ok sure, i will bug (i am slow :-( )19:49
SumitNaiksatam* bug you19:49
marunSumitNaiksatam: please do :)19:50
mesterycgoncalves: Whoops! Actually, I refreshed 10 minutes before the meeting :P19:50
mesteryClient library was your topic cgoncalves?19:50
SumitNaiksatammarun: sure will try to understand and reach out to you accordingly19:50
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:50
mandeepmarun: Good idea19:50
s3wongmarun: yes, will take a look at your link above19:50
cgoncalvesmestery: yes. I just wanted to add to this meeting that I've started working on python-neutronclient for group policy19:51
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: nice19:51
s3wongcgoncalves: very good!19:51
cgoncalvesbut it seems much will change on the API side, so better hold it a little longer19:51
banixcgoncalves: great19:51
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: i am guessing you are using the google doc as you are reference?19:51
cgoncalveshttps://github.com/cgoncalves/python-neutronclient/compare/group-policy19:51
s3wongcgoncalves: yeah - sorry about that :-)19:51
SumitNaiksatamyou are -> your19:51
prasadvcgoncalves: great19:51
mesteryVery good cgoncalves!19:52
mesteryThanks for your contributions here!19:52
cgoncalvesSumitNaiksatam: I am, and I did detect diffs between your API code and the doc19:52
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: there might be more :-)19:52
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: but great thing to get started19:52
s3wongcgoncalves: yeah - for example, action is now a Neutron object19:52
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: lets all keep in close loop19:52
SumitNaiksatams3wong: right19:52
s3wongwe just went along when we coded :-)19:52
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:52
cgoncalvesSumitNaiksatam: I've them written down on paper not to forget to re-review them later once you pushed a new version19:52
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: sweet, thanks for factoring in the changes19:53
cgoncalvesbanix: same for your work on the DB model ;)19:53
mesterycgoncalves: I'll keep a slot for client changes each week so we stay on the same page.19:53
banixsounds good; thanks19:53
mandeepcgoncalves: Is it on the shared github tree?19:53
*** demorris has quit IRC19:53
cgoncalvesno problem, folks. I'm more than glad to help you. newbie here so bear with me19:53
s3wongmandeep: I think cgoncalves provides a link above19:54
cgoncalvesI did. here it is again: https://github.com/cgoncalves/python-neutronclient/compare/group-policy19:54
SumitNaiksatammandeep: we don't have a repo for neutron client on the shared temp repo19:54
s3wongbut it isn't on our shared tree19:54
mandeeps3wong: cgoncalves: Ooops I missed that!19:54
SumitNaiksatammandeep: we can add that19:54
s3wongthere isn't a repo in our shared tree yet19:54
SumitNaiksatams3wong: yeah19:54
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: OK19:54
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: should be easy to migrate19:54
*** NehaV has quit IRC19:54
cgoncalvess3wong, SumitNaiksatam: I can pushed it in to it as long as I have perms19:54
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:55
SumitNaiksatamcgoncalves: sure, will get back to you19:55
cgoncalvesthat is, if you'd like to19:55
s3wongcgoncalves: I believe mandeep is managing that?19:55
cgoncalvesok, thanks.19:55
mandeeps3wong: Yes, I will set that up19:55
mestery#action mandeep to setup neutronclient shared repo19:55
mesteryThanks mandeep!19:55
mesteryOK, 5 minutes left. Anything else for this week?19:56
cgoncalvesthe code is still in its earlies. started yesterday afternoon, so...19:56
s3wongmestery: well, PoC may be delayed, hopefully we can still make the J-Summit19:56
mandeepcgoncalves: As is all other code ... don't worry19:56
mesterys3wong: True dat.19:56
mandeeps3wong: We still intent to19:56
mandeeps3wong: ;-)19:57
cgoncalvesmestery: there is yet another topic "services discussion". not sure you want to start it now19:57
s3wongcgoncalves: not in three minutes :-)19:57
mesteryThe service itme was to mention we'll cover it in a services meeting next week19:57
mesterySee the link in the agenda19:57
mesteryAnd plan to attend next week19:57
mesterySo, with that, lets call this meeting.19:57
cgoncalvesmestery: oh, ok.19:57
mesteryThanks folks, progress is good!19:57
banixthanks everybody19:57
mesteryAppreciate all the work from everybody!19:58
s3wongthanks!19:58
mandeepmestery: Thanks!19:58
prasadvthanks19:58
mestery#endmeeting19:58
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:58
openstackMeeting ended Thu Feb 27 19:58:07 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:58
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-02-27-19.00.html19:58
SumitNaiksatamthanks all, bye!19:58
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-02-27-19.00.txt19:58
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-02-27-19.00.log.html19:58
*** prasadv has quit IRC19:58
cgoncalvesthanks everyone19:58
*** mandeep has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
*** s3wong has quit IRC19:59
*** drake_ has quit IRC20:00
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** dshurtle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
*** hemanthravi has quit IRC20:01
*** Duane has quit IRC20:04
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:11
*** hockeynut has quit IRC20:11
*** zns has quit IRC20:11
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:11
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk20:11
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:12
*** demorris has quit IRC20:18
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:18
*** VINOD has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:18
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:20
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:22
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:24
*** hockeynut1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:24
*** hockeynut1 has quit IRC20:25
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:25
*** hockeynut1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:25
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:25
*** hockeynut has quit IRC20:28
*** hockeynut1 has quit IRC20:30
*** kebray has quit IRC20:32
*** mandeep has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:32
*** mandeep has quit IRC20:33
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** ErikB has quit IRC20:33
*** kanzhe has quit IRC20:38
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC20:38
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:40
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:40
*** songole has quit IRC20:41
*** jtomasek has quit IRC20:42
*** rkofman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:43
*** hockeynut has quit IRC20:43
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:46
*** dshurtle has quit IRC20:47
*** VINOD has quit IRC20:47
*** zns has quit IRC20:48
*** rohit404 has quit IRC20:49
*** eanxgeek is now known as eanxgeek|log20:51
*** NehaV has quit IRC20:51
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:53
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC20:53
*** bdpayne has quit IRC20:55
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:00
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:04
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC21:08
*** denis_makogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:09
*** thinrichs has quit IRC21:11
*** zns has quit IRC21:12
*** alagalah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:13
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:15
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:16
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:17
*** bdpayne has quit IRC21:18
*** ErikB has quit IRC21:19
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC21:20
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC21:23
*** denis_makogon_ is now known as denis_makogon21:23
*** Haiying has quit IRC21:23
*** dmakogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:23
*** vkmc has quit IRC21:24
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:25
*** michael-yu has quit IRC21:25
*** dprince_ has quit IRC21:28
*** vipuls is now known as vipul21:28
*** d0ugal has quit IRC21:29
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** tedchang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:32
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:34
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC21:35
*** shakayumi has quit IRC21:35
*** ErikB has quit IRC21:36
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:36
*** hockeynut has quit IRC21:37
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** kevinconway has quit IRC21:39
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC21:40
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** shakayumi has quit IRC21:41
*** PeterSchwaller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:42
*** hockeynut has quit IRC21:43
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:43
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:44
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC21:45
*** kebray has quit IRC21:46
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:47
*** d0ugal has quit IRC21:47
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:47
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC21:48
*** sarob has quit IRC21:49
*** samstav has quit IRC21:49
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** jprovazn has quit IRC21:53
*** alagalah has quit IRC21:54
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:54
*** NehaV has quit IRC21:54
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:55
*** waiman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:56
*** catherineD has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:58
*** mattgrif_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:58
*** malini has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:59
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC21:59
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:00
*** mattgrif_ has quit IRC22:00
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:00
rockyg#meeting-start RefStack22:01
catherineDHere22:01
davidlenwellisn't it start-meeting?22:01
zehicle_at_dello/22:01
rockygo/22:01
zehicle_at_dell#meetingstart22:01
rockyg#meetingstart Refstack22:01
malinihello! first time joining defcore22:02
* zehicle_at_dell appoints rockyg to be chair 22:02
waimanhi22:02
clarkbstartmeeting22:02
rockygNope.  I thing it's startmeeting22:02
rockyg#startmeeting refstack22:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Feb 27 22:02:25 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is rockyg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.22:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: refstack)"22:02
davidlenwellthere we go22:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'refstack'22:02
zehicle_at_dellbingo!22:02
davidlenwellwe'll get the hang on this one day22:02
rockygThere we go.  roll call for those who haven't typed in here since the reall start22:02
rockyg:-)22:03
waimanhi22:03
rockygDo we have an agenda?22:03
davidlenwellI only really have a few things to share since last week22:03
rockygIf not, #topic F2F next week22:04
davidlenwellso the main thng I wanted to cover is getting us into stackforge22:04
rockyg#topic F2F week of 3/322:04
*** openstack changes topic to "F2F week of 3/3 (Meeting topic: refstack)"22:04
davidlenwellits been a rocky path22:04
zehicle_at_delllet's collect agenda items22:04
rockyg#topic Stackforge22:04
davidlenwellyeah ..22:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Stackforge (Meeting topic: refstack)"22:04
zehicle_at_dellsince we have meeting on Monday22:04
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC22:04
zehicle_at_delland Demo on Tuesday22:05
davidlenwellstackforge, f2f, demo22:05
davidlenwellso we have a review to infra-config22:05
davidlenwellhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/75226/22:05
davidlenwellthat will put us in stackforge22:05
rockygother stuff next week (lots of things happening locally and lots of folks around)22:05
*** bswartz has quit IRC22:05
rockyg#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75226/22:05
davidlenwellhowever because the infra team has been hitting some hicups in their automation we are delayed till tomorrow22:06
davidlenwellhttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-February/028130.html22:06
davidlenwellthey are now doing new project fridays22:06
davidlenwellas you can see by that review that we have 3 +2's but not a +a .. they promise me we'll get the +A tomorrow and integrated22:07
rockyg#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-February/028130.html22:07
*** jdob has quit IRC22:07
rockygkewl22:07
davidlenwellyeah .. only took 8 days22:07
davidlenwellnot bad considereing the backlog they have22:07
tedchanghi22:07
davidlenwellSo once we are live in stack forge catherineD and her people can actually contribute22:08
rockygwill it build and be runnable?22:08
catherineDyes..22:08
davidlenwellwe're missing the runnable part from catherineD's team22:08
davidlenwellcatherineD: does it pass pep8 now ?22:08
catherineDyes22:08
davidlenwellawesome22:08
rockygcatherineD: double kewl22:08
davidlenwellthats good news ..22:08
davidlenwellso tomorrow when we are live .. I'll be in touch and we can get some code merged and tested22:09
rockygIt also means we'll have a good repository to work from next week.22:09
* zehicle_at_dell high 5 everyone22:09
davidlenwellI have a 3 node cluster here at my house I can run tests against running piston cloud22:09
rockygwould that be W//22:09
catherineDsure.. Unfortunately I will be out-of-town tomorrow ..22:09
catherineDgreat we need to test on some clouds that are out-side of our lab22:10
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC22:10
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:10
rockyg+122:10
zehicle_at_dell#topic TCUP22:10
davidlenwellindeed22:10
zehicle_at_dellI was trying to get it to work w/ my Rackspace creds22:10
davidlenwelldid you have any luck ?22:11
zehicle_at_dellbut was not sure what to update in the config22:11
zehicle_at_dellno, Alex was trying to help me22:11
zehicle_at_dellI could get the CLI to work22:11
zehicle_at_dellso I know it can connect22:11
zehicle_at_dellI'll have some time tomorrow to play if you're available22:11
davidlenwellI will be around all day22:12
zehicle_at_dellwhen do you get in?22:12
davidlenwellI start working at around 9 am pst22:12
zehicle_at_dellcool, I'll ping you22:12
zehicle_at_dellI'm trying to get creds for some other test clouds22:12
zehicle_at_delldid we ever reduce the # of tests? we really only need a few for this part of the work22:13
davidlenwellif I can get my router working the way I want it before then I can give you some on mine22:13
davidlenwellyes we did22:13
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:13
zehicle_at_dellso, for TCUP, we're planning a work session tomorrow at 922:14
zehicle_at_delllet's coordinate on #refstack and see if other people want to play along22:14
davidlenwellagreed22:14
zehicle_at_dellI think we are close, it seems like tempest is installed and runnable22:15
rockyg#info TCUP working session in #refstack starting 9am PST, 17:00 UTC22:15
davidlenwellcatherineD has it running ..22:15
davidlenwellshe'll share as soon as she's allowed to22:15
davidlenwellsilly lawyers22:15
zehicle_at_dellah, ok22:15
rockyg#ref to Shakespeare22:15
*** ZangMingJie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:16
*** jecarey has quit IRC22:16
catherineDAnd I also run a long test with 840 testcase ran (not all of them passed in my lab env) so want to see how it runs in other clouds22:16
zehicle_at_dellcatherineD, can you compare your working stuff to what we have in davidlenwell repo?22:16
catherineDwe are based on what Daivid has in the repo22:16
* zehicle_at_dell looking forward to getting this out in the community22:17
davidlenwellcatherineD: zehicle_at_dell merged some changes just the other day22:17
catherineDic22:17
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:17
davidlenwellalso .. joshua also took a crack at it .. put it in the scripts directory22:17
zehicle_at_dellthanks, I think I'm following the base, not david's22:17
catherineDwhat is the branch? we can test agaun ,,22:17
davidlenwellmaster22:17
davidlenwellmy repo is what stackforge will pull from tomorrow for the initial commit22:18
catherineDhave you made any update?22:18
zehicle_at_dellah, we've got changes in 2 locations22:18
davidlenwellI got in there last week and made it pass flake8 tests and fixed the license headers22:19
catherineDupdate to the David branch that is ..22:19
davidlenwellshould have been 3 commits.. mine, josh and zehicle_at_dell22:19
zehicle_at_dellit looks like josh and I did matching work in different directories22:19
davidlenwellzehicle_at_dell: you did ..22:19
davidlenwellwithin hours of each other22:20
zehicle_at_dellgreat minds22:20
davidlenwellso I have some sad news about next week..22:20
rockygis this topic baked?22:20
davidlenwellyes22:21
zehicle_at_dell+122:21
davidlenwellnext is f2f22:21
rockyg#topic F2F22:21
*** openstack changes topic to "F2F (Meeting topic: refstack)"22:21
rockygsad news?22:21
davidlenwellso my sad news is that I won't be able to make it to sf22:21
rockygDang!22:21
davidlenwellmy land lord decided to evict me because of my girlfriends dog while I was out of town last week22:21
davidlenwellso I have to move22:22
davidlenwellwhich I was unprepaired for22:22
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:22
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:22
davidlenwellbut I am available for being skyped in to any meeitng22:22
rockyg:-(  Hope you've found a nicer place22:22
davidlenwellnot yet .. but I will22:22
* zehicle_at_dell sad to hear that22:22
rockygI checked into space here.  We've got wifi, conference rooms22:22
rockygIt's in Santa Clara, though.22:23
catherineDthat  is sad for the reason of eviction ,,,22:23
zehicle_at_dellJosh offered to host - we've got a full DefCore meeting at 322:23
zehicle_at_dellI should be in the office at 1022:23
davidlenwellpiston is always happy to host the refstack crew .. just fyi .. but thats up in the city22:23
zehicle_at_dellI'd like to do it at Piston b/c that's where the defcore meeting is22:24
rockygSo, let's do an info on location.  Is Josh at Piston?22:24
davidlenwellis that on monday?22:24
zehicle_at_dellyes22:24
davidlenwelljosh is cto of piston22:24
rockygAh.22:24
zehicle_at_dell#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DefCoreElephant.522:24
zehicle_at_dellthat's the DefCore meeting22:24
davidlenwellis that meeting monday ?22:24
zehicle_at_dellyy22:25
davidlenwellI might have to try to come up for the day .. I'll let you guys know22:25
zehicle_at_dellw/ davidlenwell remote, we're going to have to work via hangout so remote work gets easier22:25
rockyg#INFO Piston Cloud 49 Geary St. Suite 530   San Francisco, CA 9410822:26
catherineDso DefCore meeting is at 3:0022:26
zehicle_at_dellnote on TCUP - those files are not the same.  They have differences that we may need to reconcile22:26
rockygWill we still meet at 10am for the F2F at Piston?22:26
zehicle_at_dellyes22:27
rockygGood.22:27
zehicle_at_dellI'll confirm w/ Josh, but that was the commitment.  he said there was a room reserved for it22:27
davidlenwellI can check that from other channels as well22:27
zehicle_at_dellI suspect we'll stop at 3 for the DefCore meeting.22:27
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC22:27
rockygYup.22:28
rockygI'm hoping for an attitude readjustment seminar after.22:28
zehicle_at_dellsince demo of TCUP + RefStack is topic for that meeting, would be good to lead off w/ that22:28
zehicle_at_dellrockyg, I think we were planning drinks - is that sufficient?22:28
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:29
davidlenwellpiston has lots of snacks .. and we like to share22:29
*** ameade has quit IRC22:29
zehicle_at_dell"Note: you MUST bring your own beverages to join by remote.  We will verify."22:29
rockygAgenda:  Current State - Gaps to demo, demo,m refstack22:29
zehicle_at_dell+122:29
zehicle_at_dell#topic demo prep22:29
rockygDrinks would work.  Nearest microbrewery would, too.  I know about Great Bear, but one might be closer.22:29
davidlenwellpiston is populated with alchoholics22:30
davidlenwellwho can't spell22:30
davidlenwell;)22:30
rockygDemo prep:  identification of required SW, HW, Networks, display22:31
rockygzehicle_at_dell will be pre3senting, correct?22:31
*** bdpayne has quit IRC22:32
rockygOr, do you want catherineD and Zehicle_at_dell to do the talking?22:32
zehicle_at_dellyy22:32
catherineDlet's talk about what we are demoing ...22:33
zehicle_at_dellFor the board meeting, I'm running it22:33
zehicle_at_dellwe may also have Josh run it too22:33
zehicle_at_dellIt does not have to us at the DefCore meeting, but I'll sleep better on Monday if I know I have a working demo22:33
rockygWould be nice to show two test sets and how easy it is to switch, if that's the case.22:34
davidlenwellshould be doable22:34
catherineDSo are we demoing running the tests ..22:35
rockygThen let's talk environment. do we have one that everyone(at lest those running) can access and that already works?22:35
davidlenwelldepending on the state of things from catherineD's team22:35
davidlenwellcatherineD: how much of the hard coding of settings have you been able to get passed?22:35
catherineDwe are down to the last 2 modules22:35
catherineDthe problem is we need to be able to check in code22:36
catherineDor all the code is still with us22:36
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:36
davidlenwellthe infra team has told me we should merge tomorrow and be good22:36
rockyglast week you said lawyers were OK with checkin if it was stackforge?22:36
davidlenwellrockyg: but we still aren't in stackforge and catherineD isn't working tomorro w22:37
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:37
davidlenwellbut then it still has to pass review22:37
davidlenwellso we are running out of time22:37
davidlenwellunless any of her people can work over the weekend at all22:37
rockygCan it be non-voting to start?22:38
davidlenwellrockyg: that sounds messy ..22:38
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC22:38
davidlenwellbut I suppose it could22:38
rockygKey is.  We get the "vote,22:38
rockyg" but we don't break if it is -122:38
rockygIf we can do that.22:39
catherineDor we can demo what we showed last week to David22:39
zehicle_at_dellwe topic jumped22:39
davidlenwellindeed22:39
zehicle_at_dellI'm ok w/ that - I think we lined out the demo last meeting22:39
rockygJust wanna make sure you know the environment you will run on and can do some test runs22:40
davidlenwellcatherineD: worst case I think demoing what you showed me is fine22:40
catherineDok that is much better ...22:40
rockygSo, worst case, we have catherineD's code and environment and we know it works.22:41
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:41
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:41
rockyg#action  fallback plan is to run catherineD's code in here environment from the last F2F22:41
davidlenwellanythings else we need to cover?22:43
rockygIf we get catherineD s code in the repo, then everyone can give it some test runs and make the calls22:43
*** bdpayne has quit IRC22:43
catherineDFor testing of the  new code, let's plan to have some public cloud for the f2f worjking session ..22:43
catherineD+1 about getting code tp repo22:44
davidlenwellcatherineD: so you said you aren't around tomorrow?22:44
catherineDyes I have a planned day off ...22:44
davidlenwellcatherineD: and I imagine you don't work on weekends?22:44
*** zehicle_at_dell_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:45
davidlenwellcan someone else on your team commit code ?22:45
catherineDI will be available Sunday afernoon ..22:45
zehicle_at_dell_back22:45
*** kebray has quit IRC22:45
catherineDI will check with my team ..22:45
catherineDabout commit code ..22:45
rockyg+122:45
davidlenwellcatherineD: it would be ideal if we could commit sooner rahter than later22:45
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC22:45
catherineD+1 as soon as it is ready ..22:46
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:46
*** lblanchard has quit IRC22:46
*** eankutse1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:47
rockyganything else on demo or stackforge?22:47
davidlenwellI don't think so22:47
catherineDCan someone send email when StackForge is ready?22:47
davidlenwellI will22:48
zehicle_at_dell_any updates on API for posting?22:48
rockyg#topic status and updates22:48
*** openstack changes topic to "status and updates (Meeting topic: refstack)"22:48
*** hockeynut has quit IRC22:49
rockygDoesn't sound like it.22:49
*** zns has quit IRC22:49
*** eankutse has quit IRC22:49
davidlenwellI think catherineD had roughed out some methods in the api22:49
davidlenwellshould work as a start22:49
*** sriram has quit IRC22:50
*** banix has quit IRC22:50
catherineDyep22:50
rockygdavidlenwell: you mentioned you had sketched out some drawings on architecture.  If you've got that and other rough stuff, I can work tomorrow on getting it into the wiki, which will make it usable for slides.22:51
*** eankutse1 has quit IRC22:51
davidlenwellI will eamil you some photos of whiteboards22:51
davidlenwelland im around to chat about it if you need to22:51
rockygfantastic22:51
rockyg8 minutes22:52
rockyg#topic open discussion22:52
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: refstack)"22:52
rockygAnything else we're forgetting?22:53
davidlenwellI think we've covered most of it unless osmeone else has questions22:53
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk22:53
catherineDwe will be at the RefStack working session?22:53
rockygYes.  Shooting for 10am.22:53
davidlenwellI am working out how to get up for the day22:53
rockygrent an rv and live out of it until you find your apartment?-)22:54
davidlenwellrockyg: tempting22:54
davidlenwelljosh just told me to move to sf and forget my home town22:54
rockygAlmost works for me.  SF is too city.22:55
davidlenwellyeah .. I could handle pacifica22:55
davidlenwellfor santa cruze22:55
davidlenwellcruz22:55
rockyg+10022:55
rockygWell, if there's nothing else...22:56
davidlenwellthat will do it22:56
rockyg#endmeeting22:56
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:56
openstackMeeting ended Thu Feb 27 22:56:33 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:56
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2014/refstack.2014-02-27-22.02.html22:56
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2014/refstack.2014-02-27-22.02.txt22:56
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2014/refstack.2014-02-27-22.02.log.html22:56
catherineDHope things work your way David22:56
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC22:57
* zehicle_at_dell_ looking forward to seeing everyone next week22:58
rockyg+122:58
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:58
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC22:59
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:59
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:59
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:00
*** hockeynut has quit IRC23:00
*** PeterSchwaller_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:01
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC23:03
*** RaymondWong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:05
*** kebray has quit IRC23:06
*** rockyg has quit IRC23:07
*** caleb_ has quit IRC23:08
*** waiman has quit IRC23:08
*** dripton has quit IRC23:09
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:10
*** RaymondWong has quit IRC23:11
*** cgoncalves has quit IRC23:11
*** zzelle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:15
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC23:18
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:19
*** cgoncalves has quit IRC23:19
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:19
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:24
*** AlanClark has quit IRC23:27
*** SumitNaiksatam_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:32
*** dkehn__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:32
*** SumitNaiksatam_ has quit IRC23:32
*** SumitNaiksatam_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:32
*** fuzzygeorge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:36
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC23:36
*** SumitNaiksatam_ is now known as SumitNaiksatam23:36
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC23:36
*** rstritt has quit IRC23:37
*** rosmaita_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:41
*** NehaV1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:42
*** SpamapS_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:43
*** arnaud|a1k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:44
*** malini1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:44
*** jmontemayor_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:44
*** zehicle_at_dell_ has quit IRC23:44
*** arnaud__ has quit IRC23:45
*** _jmp_ has quit IRC23:45
*** arnaud|afk has quit IRC23:45
*** SpamapS has quit IRC23:45
*** rosmaita has quit IRC23:45
*** NehaV has quit IRC23:45
*** malini has quit IRC23:45
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC23:45
*** jwalls has quit IRC23:45
*** jwalls has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:45
*** richm has quit IRC23:45
*** yogesh has quit IRC23:45
*** jmontemayor_ has quit IRC23:46
*** jmontemayor_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:46
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:47
*** _jmp_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:47
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:47
*** _jmp_ is now known as Guest7680623:47
*** jwalls has quit IRC23:49
*** sarob has quit IRC23:53
*** SpamapS_ is now known as SpamapS23:53
*** SpamapS has quit IRC23:53
*** SpamapS has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:53
*** dkehn__ is now known as dkehn_23:55
*** NehaV1 has quit IRC23:56
*** kevinconway has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!