Thursday, 2014-03-20

stevebaker#startmeeting heat00:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 20 00:01:55 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is stevebaker. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.00:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.00:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: heat)"00:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'heat'00:02
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:02
stevebaker#topic rollcall00:02
*** openstack changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: heat)"00:02
sdake_o/00:02
zanebgreetings00:02
spzalaHi00:02
bgorskio/00:02
mspreitzo/00:02
*** julim has quit IRC00:03
zanebbgorski: you're up late!00:03
zanebor early00:03
stevebaker#topic Review last meeting's actions00:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Review last meeting's actions (Meeting topic: heat)"00:03
stevebakereveryone to write tempest tests ;)00:03
bgorskizaneb, yes I am 1 am :)00:04
stevebakereveryone: did you to that yet?00:04
mspreitzon my list for today00:04
*** tango has quit IRC00:04
stevebakerI got the autoscaling test working locally. I'm just waiting for infra firewall changes so we can make cloudwatch and heat-api calls from servers00:04
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:05
stevebakermake trusts the default, with graceful fallback so existing configuration files continue to work00:05
*** eguz has quit IRC00:05
bgorskiI thinking about adding some test for the VPNaaS but I have a problem with finding the time for it00:05
stevebakernot sure where shardy is at with that, he is travelling this week00:05
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:05
mspreitzI haven't decided on a scenario, what are you others doing?00:05
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:05
stevebaker#topic Adding items to the agenda00:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Adding items to the agenda (Meeting topic: heat)"00:05
stevebaker#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282014-3-19_0000_UTC.2900:05
stevebakeranything else to add?00:06
stevebaker#topic Icehouse rc-1 bug burndown list00:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Icehouse rc-1 bug burndown list (Meeting topic: heat)"00:06
stevebakerSo our rc1 will be cut next week as soon as our line goes to zero00:07
stevebaker#link http://old-wiki.openstack.org/rc/00:07
*** greghaynes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:07
zanebmspreitz: there are a bunch of Heat bugs tagged with Tempest. Just grab one and assign it to yourself00:07
stevebaker#linke https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/icehouse-rc100:07
stevebaker#link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/icehouse-rc100:07
stevebakermspreitz: a test implementing basic update operations would be a good start00:08
stevebaker17 bugs in progress, 6 triaged00:08
sdake_adding update to the api tests would be good too00:08
stevebakerso if you need a priority on what to review, go for the High importance in progress bugs00:09
stevebakerbgorski: do you want to take https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1279645 ?00:09
*** eghobo has quit IRC00:10
bgorskistevebaker, ok I will take it00:10
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:10
stevebakerSpamapS: should we kick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160052 from rc1?00:10
*** atiwari has quit IRC00:10
mspreitzwhat moves a bug from "Fix Committed" to "so done it is not even listed" ?00:11
stevebakermspreitz: that is Fix Released00:11
mspreitzthanks00:11
stevebakerIf there is a bug which you think should block the release of rc1 then let me know, otherwise I might kick it00:12
stevebakerthats all I've got00:13
stevebaker#topic Open Discussion00:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: heat)"00:13
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC00:13
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:14
stevebakershould we finish early?00:14
mspreitzI am not ready to raise anything else right now00:15
sdake_might as well, pretyt light crew00:15
stevebaker#endmeeting00:15
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"00:15
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 20 00:15:44 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)00:15
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2014/heat.2014-03-20-00.01.html00:15
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2014/heat.2014-03-20-00.01.txt00:15
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2014/heat.2014-03-20-00.01.log.html00:15
stevebaker45 minutes of freedom!00:15
mattoliverauWell that's definitely the shortest meeting I've seen :P00:16
*** bgorski has quit IRC00:18
*** gokrokve has quit IRC00:19
*** ijw has quit IRC00:21
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:22
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:23
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:23
*** hockeynut has quit IRC00:25
*** baoli has quit IRC00:25
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:26
*** Swami has quit IRC00:26
*** ijw has quit IRC00:31
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:35
*** fredp1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:35
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:35
*** dguitarbite_ has quit IRC00:38
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:38
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:40
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:43
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
*** fredp1 has quit IRC00:49
*** ijw has quit IRC00:52
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:52
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:52
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:55
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:55
*** ijw has quit IRC00:57
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC00:59
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC01:00
*** amcrn has quit IRC01:06
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC01:07
*** khyati has quit IRC01:09
*** IlyaE has quit IRC01:14
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:14
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:16
*** venkatesh has quit IRC01:17
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:17
*** eghobo has quit IRC01:18
*** eguz has quit IRC01:19
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:25
*** ken1ohmichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:27
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:29
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:32
*** mspreitz has quit IRC01:32
*** ameade has quit IRC01:33
*** venkatesh has quit IRC01:34
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC01:34
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC01:35
*** demorris has quit IRC01:37
*** tedchang has quit IRC01:38
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:38
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:39
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC01:39
SpamapSstevebaker: probably going to have to. I'm not getting any spare cycles to finish my half fix01:49
*** ijw_ has quit IRC01:51
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:53
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:01
*** sdake_ has quit IRC02:04
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:04
*** ijw has quit IRC02:11
*** nosnos_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:16
*** spzala has quit IRC02:17
*** richm has quit IRC02:18
*** bill_az_ has quit IRC02:19
*** nosnos has quit IRC02:19
*** gyee has quit IRC02:20
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:22
*** ken1ohmichi has quit IRC02:26
*** derekh has quit IRC02:27
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:31
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:33
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:35
*** eankutse has quit IRC02:36
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:36
*** mwagner__ is now known as mwagner__zzzz02:37
*** rjrjr_ has quit IRC02:39
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:42
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:46
*** eankutse1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:50
*** eankutse1 has quit IRC02:54
*** eankutse has quit IRC02:54
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:57
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC03:02
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:02
*** arnaud has quit IRC03:10
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:11
*** vkmc has quit IRC03:13
*** demorris has quit IRC03:16
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:17
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC03:22
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away03:23
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:26
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:30
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:33
*** eghobo has quit IRC03:38
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC03:48
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:50
*** SushilKM has quit IRC03:52
*** venkatesh has quit IRC03:57
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:58
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC04:01
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC04:03
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:05
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:09
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:09
*** banix has quit IRC04:12
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:12
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:17
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:21
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:29
*** IlyaE has quit IRC04:29
*** samstav has quit IRC04:40
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:40
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:40
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:45
*** Leonr has quit IRC04:48
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC04:48
*** gokrokve has quit IRC04:49
*** ErikB1 has quit IRC04:53
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:55
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC04:58
*** khyati has quit IRC05:08
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:09
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:10
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC05:17
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:19
*** nosnos_ has quit IRC05:23
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:28
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:29
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:31
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:34
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:38
*** gokrokve has quit IRC05:38
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:40
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:44
*** tedchang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:47
*** tedchang has quit IRC05:47
*** bdpayne has quit IRC05:49
*** nosnos_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:49
*** nosnos has quit IRC05:51
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:57
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC05:57
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC05:58
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:59
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:01
*** saju_m has quit IRC06:02
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:03
*** jtomasek has quit IRC06:03
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:04
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC06:06
*** saju_m has quit IRC06:07
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:08
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:10
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:14
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC06:17
*** IlyaE has quit IRC06:18
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC06:24
*** saju_m has quit IRC06:35
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:37
*** betsy has quit IRC06:42
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC06:44
*** eghobo has quit IRC06:47
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:47
*** tanisdl has quit IRC06:48
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:50
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:51
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:51
*** Barker has quit IRC06:52
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:53
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:59
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:05
*** caleb_ has quit IRC07:08
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:08
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:08
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC07:12
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:14
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC07:19
*** samstav has quit IRC07:20
*** nwidell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:22
*** ttrumm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:25
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:34
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC07:36
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:39
*** bdpayne has quit IRC07:39
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8707:50
*** caleb_` has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:56
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:56
*** caleb_ has quit IRC07:58
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:02
*** caleb_` has quit IRC08:06
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC08:07
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:08
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:19
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:24
*** amcrn has quit IRC08:26
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:27
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:28
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC08:29
*** jgallard has quit IRC08:33
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:33
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:33
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC08:35
*** nosnos_ has quit IRC08:37
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC08:47
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:52
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:56
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:58
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:59
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC09:00
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC09:03
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC09:04
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:16
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:20
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:25
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:27
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC09:29
*** safchain has quit IRC09:37
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:50
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:50
*** yogesh has quit IRC09:53
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:53
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC09:54
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC09:55
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:56
*** ttrumm has quit IRC09:58
*** nosnos has quit IRC09:59
*** yamahata has quit IRC10:02
*** jcoufal has quit IRC10:06
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:09
*** rwsu has quit IRC10:18
*** safchain has quit IRC10:18
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:20
*** xuhanp has quit IRC10:21
*** ttrumm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:24
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:25
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC10:30
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:33
*** hdd has quit IRC10:33
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC10:43
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:44
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:44
*** hdd has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:48
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC10:48
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC10:49
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:53
*** eanxgeek is now known as eanxgeek|mtg10:59
*** chandankumar_ has quit IRC11:00
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:01
*** Kiall has quit IRC11:02
*** kiall has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:04
*** nwidell has quit IRC11:15
*** jtomasek has quit IRC11:15
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:16
*** julienvey has quit IRC11:16
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:25
*** jgallard has quit IRC11:25
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:26
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC11:30
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:31
*** ErikB has quit IRC11:31
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:32
*** nwidell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:33
*** ErikB has quit IRC11:33
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:33
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:35
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:35
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC11:35
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:36
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:36
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:37
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC11:37
*** eankutse has quit IRC11:37
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:38
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC11:38
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:38
*** markmcclain has quit IRC11:39
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:41
*** safchain_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:42
*** safchain has quit IRC11:42
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC11:42
*** eanxgeek|mtg is now known as eanxgeek11:45
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:47
*** david-lyle has quit IRC11:52
*** ErikB has quit IRC11:55
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:59
*** ErikB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:01
*** ttrumm has quit IRC12:01
*** ttrumm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:01
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:02
*** eankutse has quit IRC12:02
*** ujuc has quit IRC12:04
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:04
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:09
*** saju_m has quit IRC12:09
*** lcostantino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:11
*** sballe has quit IRC12:12
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:12
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:12
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:19
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:27
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:27
*** banix has quit IRC12:31
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:31
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC12:31
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:33
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:35
*** eankutse1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:37
*** eankutse has quit IRC12:37
*** demorris has quit IRC12:42
*** eankutse1 has quit IRC12:44
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:44
*** nosnos has quit IRC12:46
*** eankutse has quit IRC12:50
*** kashyap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:52
*** saju_m has quit IRC12:53
*** nwidell has quit IRC12:54
*** tedchang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:54
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:58
*** Barker has quit IRC12:59
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:00
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:00
*** ameade has quit IRC13:01
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:03
*** mwagner__zzzz is now known as mwagner_13:04
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:04
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk13:05
*** jrist has quit IRC13:06
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:07
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:08
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:10
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8713:12
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:12
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:15
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:15
*** saju_m has quit IRC13:23
*** mugsie has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:23
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:27
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC13:32
*** shaunak is now known as ycombinator13:33
*** mriedem has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:34
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:36
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC13:38
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:39
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:45
*** jtomasek has quit IRC13:47
*** yamahata has quit IRC13:48
*** saju_m has quit IRC13:48
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:48
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:49
*** jswarren has quit IRC13:50
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** ycombinator has quit IRC13:54
*** ycombinator has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:54
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** yogesh has quit IRC13:58
*** jergerber has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** sbalukoff1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
*** devoid has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** browne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
russellb#startmeeting nova14:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 20 14:01:19 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is russellb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)"14:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'14:01
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
russellbhello everyone!  who's here to talk about nova?14:01
alaskio/14:01
dansmitho/14:01
johnthetubaguyo/14:01
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC14:01
russellb#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova14:01
garykhi14:02
russellb#topic icehouse-rc114:02
*** openstack changes topic to "icehouse-rc1 (Meeting topic: nova)"14:02
russellb#link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-rc114:02
russellbwe're aiming to release RC1 next week14:02
russellb9 bugs on the list left to close out14:02
russellblet's see if we can merge as much as we can this week14:02
russellbcome next week i want to start allowing only show stopper and regressions on the list14:03
russellbso some of these would get bumped to "nice to have" if they don't make it this week14:03
russellbanyone aware of issues not on this list that should be?14:03
garykis the state of the gate a concern?14:03
russellbi see the gate time, what's the root cause?14:04
*** PhilD has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
russellbi see this patch was promoted to the head of the gate: https://review.openstack.org/7981614:04
alaskiI think a couple of those might be in the gate already14:04
russellbexcellent14:04
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC14:04
garykthis seems to be the bug that is reported on failures - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/128352214:04
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
*** mdbooth has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
russellb138 fails in 24hrs / 956 fails in 14 days14:05
russellbon that bug14:05
russellbouch14:05
russellblooks like a related patch merged 39 minutes ago14:06
dansmithyeah, neutron deadlock and libvirt timeouts are the two issues I think14:06
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
russellbOK14:06
*** kevinconway has quit IRC14:06
russellbso looks like patches going in now related to both14:06
russellbso hopefully we'll see some improvement today14:06
*** sbalukoff1 is now known as sbalukoff14:07
russellbif something is approved by monday and just fighting through the gate, we can still try to get it in14:07
russellbnot a huge deal14:07
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:07
russellbany comments / questions / concerns on icehouse-rc1?14:07
russellbone bug was brought up by cyeoh for discussion14:08
russellbthough he can't be here14:08
russellb#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/128629714:08
russellb"we made a backwards incompatible change in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40811/ which caused this"14:08
russellb"some details here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/030508.html"14:08
russellbquestion is, even though it's been merged for almost all of icehouse, do we revert it or not?14:08
johnthetubaguyapi was not very usable before that change though, not by a non-admin anyways14:08
johnthetubaguybut breaking our users seems possibly worse14:09
dansmithmy opinion is that it's been out in the wild for a long time, it's hard to justify reverting it at this point, IMHO14:09
johnthetubaguyI wondered about making the flavor auth silently succeed if its a no-op, but maybe thats making things worse14:09
russellbttx's point on list was, if we leave it, we decide to also break everyone going release to release14:09
russellbwhich is honestly a lot more common14:10
russellbthan CD14:10
russellbthat's my impression at least14:10
dansmithit's a semantic change though, right? not a hard break, and it fails in a reasonable way14:10
dansmithI guess I didn't realize there was a thread yet14:10
PhilDSounds more like we fixed a bug than made an incompatible change to me - I'd vote it should stay14:10
russellbOK, make your votes on the thread14:10
russellbjust want to make sure it's a conscious decision14:10
russellbmy gut says leave it, too14:11
russellbFWIW14:11
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:11
russellb#topic bugs14:11
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: nova)"14:11
russellbother bugs stuff14:11
russellbnot sure who added this one to the agenda14:11
russellb"https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77524/ bug fix related to cinder and keystone v3, cinderclient is already fixed but nova needs to use keystone v3 API - question is what needs to happen before we are "supporting" keystone v3? What needs to happen in Tempest? What areas of nova do we know need to change?"14:11
*** bill_az_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
PhilDI think we do need to be claer on "Bug fix" vs "incompatible change" though - any bug fix in the API is a visible change, and this makes the code match the API documentation14:12
russellbagreed with that14:13
johnthetubaguy+114:13
russellb#topic blueprints14:13
*** openstack changes topic to "blueprints (Meeting topic: nova)"14:13
russellbOK, juno blueprints!14:13
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk14:13
russellbthere's been some progress on an updated process for Juno14:13
russellb#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Nova14:13
russellbjohnthetubaguy just updated that wiki page14:13
PhilDAre we still doing Keystone V3 support as a topic ?14:13
russellbPhilD: let's come back to it if you'd like, didn't seem like anyone was around to cover that, but can come back to it14:14
russellbso, we have a nova-specs git repo14:14
russellbwe have a template in the repo for specs14:14
russellband we want to require *all* juno blueprints to go through this repo for review14:14
russellbeven ones previously reviewed14:14
johnthetubaguyI have just unapproved all non-completed blueprints, turns out it is possible14:14
russellbjohnthetubaguy: great14:14
*** zhangleiqiang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:15
russellbnote that we're going to be learning on the go with this, it's a bit of experimentation14:15
russellbbut i think it's going to result in much better reviews than using the horrible "whiteboard"14:15
russellband we'll have a nice archive of specs in git14:15
russellbI think the repo is open for business at this point though14:15
lcostantinoso, every BP that were approved and had code but deferred will have to go tru this new process right?14:16
russellbcorrect14:16
russellbif it was previously approved, hopefully the review will be quick14:16
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:16
lcostantinogreat14:16
russellbbut it does mean we're requiring a much more thorough design document14:16
russellbwhere as before we may have been more lenient14:16
johnthetubaguyone big bonus is the use of gerrit should lead to more consistency, in the long run14:17
russellband should address a major complaint i get about the quality of blueprint detail14:18
russellba bit less painful to enforce here14:18
devoidso do you place the non-approved blueprint in /juno, what is the naming convention?14:18
russellbdevoid: it's covered in the tempalte14:18
russellbjuno/approved/my-blueprint.rst14:18
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
russellbwhere my-blueprint is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/my-blueprint14:19
johnthetubaguyrussellb: do we want to leave the template open to comments till Monday, for those who are interested?14:19
russellbjohnthetubaguy: i think we should open it now, and say watch for updates14:19
russellbi suspect we may have a continuous flow of updates through the cycle14:19
devoidI know that the operators group is working to better lay out end-user and deployer impact.14:19
russellbdevoid: oh?  for this?14:20
russellbsure, that'd be great14:20
devoidfor blueprint approvals14:20
russellband can just be submitted to gerrit as an update to our template14:20
devoidyup.14:20
russellbany questions or concerns?14:20
johnthetubaguyrussellb: OK, so I am keen to wait for that feedback? or do we want to go now?14:21
russellbotherwise i'll post to the mailing list today drawing more attention to the progress14:21
devoidone concern is if blueprints are approved too quickly there's no time for a broad set of people to review.14:21
russellbjohnthetubaguy: sure, I guess the udpate this week can be "take a look at our template and provide feedback", that's fine with me14:21
PhilDGood point, I'd like to see some guildlines on that point.14:21
russellbthat seems fair14:21
johnthetubaguyrussellb: yeah, sorry to add a delay14:22
dansmithrussellb: even with this new system, we're planning not to approve until there is some actual code as we discussed in UT right?14:22
russellbjohnthetubaguy: no worries14:22
johnthetubaguyso, about delays14:22
russellbdansmith: good question14:22
russellbi think there's two things14:22
russellb1) approving the spec14:22
russellb2) approving a blueprint into a milestone based on that spec14:22
dansmithoh, targeting14:22
dansmithgotcha14:22
russellbmaybe we should separate those things14:22
dansmithyes14:22
dansmiththat sounds fine to me14:22
johnthetubaguysometime we need to push little things through, I don't like adding a big delay, but blueprint delays feel better than code.14:22
*** santibaldassin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:22
russellbjohnthetubaguy: which makes the "originally approved for" thing a bit more difficult14:22
dansmithjust need to make it clear what "approving the spec" means14:22
johnthetubaguyrussellb: yeah, true14:23
*** nwidell has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:23
russellbjohnthetubaguy: makes me want to go back to removing it ...14:23
johnthetubaguyrussellb: I wonder about a proposed folder, then move into approved when code goes up, but that feels bad...14:23
russellbsounds like tracking work14:24
russellband i'm hoping to keep tracking separate14:24
johnthetubaguyrussellb: how about just saying approved in Juno-1, but first target might be Juno-2, I am ok with that14:24
devoidshouldn't you approve a blueprint separate from code?14:24
johnthetubaguyrussellb: yeah, tracking in one place, lp, makes most sense14:24
russellbjohnthetubaguy: OK, but maybe a note to the template and wiki page that clarifies the difference between approving the spec, and targeting to a milestone14:24
johnthetubaguydevoid: we sure will, but don't want to approve too much that no one will ever work on14:24
alaskiI'm +1 on removing the milestone stuff from the template fwiw14:25
russellbalaski: yeah +1 i think ... it's confusing14:25
PhilDMaybe we could try and capture what would constitute having a wide range of feedback into the spec review - so for example that there should be some review from an operator, etc ?    Feels that's more whats needed than just (has it been open for review X days)14:25
*** garyk has quit IRC14:25
johnthetubaguyalaski: I just worry there is no way to track the history, but yeah, it seems simpler to remove it at this point, its just confusing :(14:25
russellbPhilD: perhaps, but i think it also depends on the blueprint14:25
russellbthere's a lot of blueprint stuff ops aren't going to care about14:25
*** betsy has quit IRC14:25
russellbor things that are really just not controversial14:25
russellbmajor refactorings14:25
devoidagreed, it depends on the bp.14:26
russellbmaybe case by case, ensure we have sufficient input based on what it is14:26
johnthetubaguyPhilD: neutron patches we wait for neutron core, it seems similar to that kind of thing, just do it case by case?14:26
devoidposts to mailing list and operators can help for things that clearly need operator input.14:26
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
PhilDYeah, its hard to get the balance I know.  Just feels that a s John noted a delay here is much better (or at least much less bad) than a delay/rework later on - so we shouldn't be shy of holding off approval in those cases.  I'd rather see this stage lean to slower14:27
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:28
russellbgood poitn14:28
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:28
russellbit's much less costly to rework a spec than code14:28
johnthetubaguypersonally, any new process should feel more lightweight than before, I think letting people do the "right thing" and see what breaks is best here14:28
russellbso we need to ensure we get it right14:28
russellbjohnthetubaguy: agreed14:28
johnthetubaguyPhilD: +114:28
russellbbut i think the things we've talked about are good principles14:28
johnthetubaguyyeah, we should evolve those review guidelines14:29
russellbindeed14:29
johnthetubaguy#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Blueprint_Review_Criteria14:29
PhilDI think its not always easy to devs to judge what does and doesn;t haev an impact on an operator (see some of the recent reverts)  - and part of the point of this is to have BPs expressed to the extent that a non-coder can underdstand what's intended14:29
russellb#link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova-specs/tree/template.rst14:30
PhilDIf they can;t then the BP isn't really complete enough IMO14:30
johnthetubaguyPhilD: I would love to see operators join nova-drivers, by participating in lots of nova-specs reviews, just lets see how that goes I think14:30
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:30
PhilDI'll be there ;-)14:30
johnthetubaguyPhilD: the big issue was not having a blueprint that made it clear there was an impact, hopefully we will now be better at that!14:31
russellbany more on blueprints?14:31
russellbit will be an evolving process i'm sure14:31
johnthetubaguyno from me14:31
russellbbut appreciate willingness to try it out and evolve14:32
devoidrussellb: +114:32
russellbhelps when nobody likes the current situation, heh14:32
PhilD+114:32
russellb#topic open discussion14:32
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: nova)"14:32
russellbplenty of time for other topics if anyone would like14:32
PhilDKeystone V3 ?14:32
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC14:33
russellbsure14:33
PhilDMostly this is a client issue - I was just wondering what plans were for getting V3 support into the client14:33
russellbno plans on my radar14:33
russellbthere's been a bit more broad hierarchical multi-tenancy discussion14:34
PhilDWell V2 becomes deprecited in Icehouse, so we'll need to do something14:34
russellbwhich would require v314:34
russellbi think there's some coordination fail in there14:34
russellbi think it's absurd to mark something deprecated when almost every project doesn't support the new thing yet14:34
sdaguerussellb: agreed14:35
* russellb pings to see if dolphm happens to be around14:35
sdagueperhaps that should be on the project meeting for next week14:35
mroddeni think its their way of cracking the whip...14:35
PhilDWe want to eb abel to use domains in Keystone, which means you only have to be able to use the V3 into Keystone from Horizon say, but other clients on V2 now need to be able to auch users when there name isn;t unique.   You can kind of do this via teh V2 API by going to ID based auth, but that's a bti clutzy (but Ok as a short term move)]14:35
russellbsdague: +114:36
devoidressellb: especially when keystone's cli client doesn't support v3 either.14:36
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:36
PhilDI have patches up for that in nova and neutron client at the moment14:36
mroddendevoid: v3 support comes from openstack client14:36
PhilDAnd I see that some other piecemeal changes seem to be trying to land14:36
russellbthere's some keystone v3 coordination needed across projects, so let's plan to cover that in the next cross project meeting (tuesday)14:37
brownemrodden: yes, but the keystoneclient middleware doesn't support v3 i believe14:37
russellbplease join if you're interested and able14:37
PhilDOk - what time ?14:37
PhilD@browne - I think it does14:37
russellb#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting14:37
mroddenbrowne: yeah i'm not sure about that14:37
russellb2100 UTC14:37
PhilDOk, I'll see what I can do14:38
russellbsorry for the rough time14:38
devoidbrowne, mrodden, the middleware supports v3, just not the cli. but openstack client doesn't have packages available yet.14:38
russellb#note need to discuss keystone v3 support across projects in the next cross project meeting14:38
*** jmcbride has quit IRC14:38
brownei may be wrong, but i think the auth_token middleware still only supports getting v2 tokens14:39
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:39
russellbdolph doesn't seem to be around14:40
*** Haiying has quit IRC14:40
russellbanother option would be to start a ML thread14:40
*** ttrumm has quit IRC14:40
russellbanyone interested in doing that?14:40
PhilDI thought it could be configured to work with v2 and v3, but I could be wrong too - it would be good to get some clartiy about what the planned migration is for s system running V2 to one running V314:40
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
PhilDYeah I could do that14:41
russellbok perfect14:41
russellbmuch appreciated14:41
* johnthetubaguy wonders how long it will be before all clients migrate to v3 keystone14:41
russellbyes, need to figure out what the migration is expected to look like14:41
brownehttps://github.com/openstack/python-keystoneclient/blob/master/keystoneclient/middleware/auth_token.py#L76414:42
PhilDI'm trying to see if we can get our Keystone folks to tackle the v3 for all clients  - seems like it would make more sense for them to do it that for each project to have to work out what to do.   Most clients don't even include the keystoen client at the moment though14:43
russellbPhilD: +114:43
PhilDI said "trying" - I still have some way to go to convince them ;-)14:43
russellbwell, personally that's what i expect from all projects14:44
PhilDOf course if only we had a single converged client .....14:44
russellbjust like with nova v3, i expect nova devs to reach out and help do the work to migrate users of nova14:44
johnthetubaguyPhilD: thats looking closer now right?14:44
russellbour client of course, but also help fix horizon, trove, heat14:44
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
*** rramirez has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
*** arnaud__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
ndipanovsorry guys forgot about this14:45
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
russellbndipanov: so you had an issue you wanted to bring up?14:45
mriedemoops14:45
ndipanovand my calendar was chillin as well14:45
ndipanovso yeah... I looked into https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/graceful-shutdown14:46
johnthetubaguywe are a bit closer on that one these days right?14:46
ndipanovand apart from a bug in nova that is easy to fix... that makes this dead after switching to oslo14:46
ndipanovI still don't think this is done14:47
russellbndipanov: incomplete or fundamentally broken?14:47
johnthetubaguyndipanov: you got that bug?14:47
ndipanovrussellb, I'd say incomplete14:47
ndipanovonce the service receives one of these signals - for this to work properly it needs to rally wait for every gt to finish14:48
ndipanovand also finish any rpc stuff it has going on14:48
ndipanovbut not accept any other connections14:48
ndipanovdoes that sound sane?14:48
ndipanovjohnthetubaguy, yes - it's really tiny14:49
johnthetubaguyndipanov: I thought that was done already14:49
johnthetubaguyndipanov: stops getting new rpc messages at least, and waits for current stuff to finish14:49
johnthetubaguyndipanov: I thought it used to anyway...14:50
johnthetubaguyleifz: ping14:50
dansmithjohnthetubaguy: I think he's saying that post oslo-messaging things are different now14:50
ndipanovjohnthetubaguy, I don't think so - it just calls (well should) rpc.cleanup() which eventually calls connection.close14:50
brownePhilD: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/030403.html14:51
ndipanovdansmith, I think they aren't fundamentally14:51
johnthetubaguyright I got you, so it got regressed by the oslo changes14:51
dansmithI think we need to stop listening to compute.$host, but leave everything else until all the GTs die, right?14:51
ndipanovdansmith, right14:51
ndipanovdansmith, and that's not what's happening14:51
dansmithotherwise conductor things will just fail14:51
dansmithyeah14:51
ndipanovjohnthetubaguy, it did regress from not working to not working even more :)14:52
johnthetubaguyndipanov: ok… I got the impression the stop listening to the queue stuff got implemented in olso, then sync across, but I have not looked in detail at that… oops14:52
ndipanovwell I don't think it is anyway...14:52
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC14:52
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:53
*** mspreitz has quit IRC14:53
johnthetubaguyndipanov: that was the intention at least, so I am certainly agreed with you there14:53
ndipanovdansmith, would you say that in order to test this - you could 1) kill the conductor just to cause a call delay14:54
ndipanov2) boot an instance14:54
ndipanov3) send SIGINT to compute and restart conductor.14:54
ndipanov4) see that the boot finishes and then compute dies14:55
ndipanov?14:55
dansmithndipanov: manual testing? I'd say start a tempest largeops run against devstack and then kill your compute and see some logs that show it cleaning things up14:55
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
dansmithndipanov: because killing conductor will hide whether you're properly still open for rpc replies I think14:55
*** mwagner is now known as mwagner_notHere14:55
ndipanovhmmm14:56
dansmithit's not going to be an easy test14:56
johnthetubaguyyeah, just kill compute, see the rpc count rise as you issue terminate commands to all the vms on the compute?14:56
dansmithmaybe just "nova boot foo; sleep 0.5; killall nova-compute"14:56
johnthetubaguyideally during a snapshot, so you have to wait for the snapshot to finsih, then nova-compute to die14:57
dansmithand then check in the db that it got to active14:57
johnthetubaguythat bp doesn't do any tidy up14:57
johnthetubaguyits just about a kill that waits for current things to finish14:57
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
johnthetubaguy(to avoid the need for any tidy up)14:58
*** jmcbride has quit IRC14:58
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
dansmithanyway, we're about out of time, but sounds like some thankin' needs doin' on how to make sure this works14:58
russellb:)14:59
russellbany other topics with 1 minute left?14:59
*** browne has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
ndipanovjohnthetubaguy, afaict it doesn't even do that ... it will call service.stop() which just kills gts14:59
russellbk, back to #openstack-nova we go!  :)14:59
russellbthanks everyone!14:59
russellb#endmeeting14:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:59
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 20 14:59:49 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2014/nova.2014-03-20-14.01.html14:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2014/nova.2014-03-20-14.01.txt14:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2014/nova.2014-03-20-14.01.log.html14:59
*** hockeynut has quit IRC15:00
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
bswartz#startmeeting manila15:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 20 15:01:27 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: manila)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:01
bswartzhello everyone15:01
vponomaryovHi15:01
xyang1hi15:01
bswartzjust us 3?15:02
bswartzwe can probably make this meeting quick15:02
bswartzwe made some good progress last week15:02
bswartzI'm happy about the stuff getting merged15:02
bswartzlet's jump right into status15:02
bswartz#topic dev status15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "dev status (Meeting topic: manila)"15:02
vponomaryovDev status:15:02
vponomaryov1) Implementation of activation api into multitenant drivers15:03
vponomaryovbp: #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/share-network-activation-api15:03
vponomaryov1.1) Cmode driver, #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81744/15:03
vponomaryov1.2) Generic driver, #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81808/15:03
vponomaryovstatus: Work in progress.15:03
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
vponomaryov2) Quota for activated share-networks15:03
vponomaryovbp: #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/quota-for-share-networks15:03
vponomaryovgerrit: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78974/15:03
vponomaryovgerrit: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78979/15:03
vponomaryov3) Router-less connectivity for generic driver15:03
vponomaryovbp: #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/direct-service-vm-connectivity15:03
vponomaryovgerrit: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80790/15:03
vponomaryovstatus: Work in progress.15:03
vponomaryovTODO:15:03
vponomaryov1) Update Horizon extension for Manila due to API changes, bugfixing15:03
vponomaryov2) Implement volume types server side15:04
vponomaryovthat's all15:04
bswartzvponomaryov: you forgot the biggest one!15:04
vponomaryovmerged Cmode driver =)15:05
bswartzvponomaryov: we merged the full-multitenant cmode driver on tuesday15:05
bswartzsome work is still needed but it was polished enough to go in15:05
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:05
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:05
bswartzokay so the share-network-activation stuff is good15:05
*** mwagner_ has quit IRC15:06
*** mriedem has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
bswartzlooks like I need to review the quota stuff15:06
vponomaryovat least someone =)15:06
xyang1glad that the cmode driver got merged!15:06
bswartzanyone have questions on any of the in-progress work?15:06
bswartzxyang1: it took way longer than I expected15:06
vponomaryovbswartz; there are little problem with api for cmode15:06
bswartzxyang1: I think it was improved by the rigorous code reviews though15:07
vponomaryovwe can disscuss out of meeting scope15:07
bswartzvponomaryov: after we wrap up this meeting I'll PM you15:07
bswartzI'm curious about the image work and the gateway driver but I don't see anyone from redhat15:08
vponomaryovI dont have questions except pm one15:08
bswartzcsaba/rraja: ping15:08
*** devoid has quit IRC15:09
bswartzokay so it looks like we're working on the right stuff15:09
*** xyang1_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:09
bswartzmy concern at this point is the likelihood of everything we want being done in time for atlanta15:10
*** xyang1 has quit IRC15:10
xyang1_do you think Horizon integration can be done?15:10
bswartzI want to make sure we're communicating accurately about the the progress of development\15:10
bswartzxyang1_: that work has already started but it's stalled with some of these other infrastructure-related changes15:11
bswartzI'm trying to get more people involved but everyone is very busy :-(15:11
bswartzI'll make sure to communicate to the stakeholders that the schedule is looking risky15:11
vponomaryovbswartz: what plans do you have about incubation?15:12
bswartzvponomaryov: we plan to meet with the TC around the time of the conference -- I'm not sure if before or after would be better15:12
bswartzthere are arguments for both15:12
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC15:13
bswartzbut the target is mid-may15:13
vponomaryovok, thanks15:13
bswartz#topic open discussion15:13
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: manila)"15:13
bswartzanything else for today?15:13
vponomaryovnot from me15:13
bswartzmust be everyone's on spring break....15:13
xyang1_I'm fine15:13
bswartzokay thanks everyone15:14
bswartz#endmeeting15:14
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:14
xyang1_thanks15:14
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 20 15:14:08 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:14
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-03-20-15.01.html15:14
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-03-20-15.01.txt15:14
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2014/manila.2014-03-20-15.01.log.html15:14
*** jmcbride has quit IRC15:15
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:16
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
*** nwidell has quit IRC15:18
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:18
*** eankutse has quit IRC15:19
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:21
*** d89 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:21
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:25
*** krtaylor has quit IRC15:27
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC15:30
*** jmcbride has quit IRC15:31
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs15:37
*** Haiying has quit IRC15:38
*** banix has quit IRC15:38
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC15:39
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:39
*** arnaud__ has quit IRC15:41
*** arnaud__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:41
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
*** betsy has quit IRC15:43
*** arnaud__ has quit IRC15:46
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
*** arnaud__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
*** demorris_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
*** demorris_ has quit IRC15:49
*** demorris has quit IRC15:50
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:50
*** feleouet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
*** sreshetnyak has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
*** sreshetnyak has quit IRC15:53
*** noslzzp has quit IRC15:55
*** jdob has quit IRC15:55
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC15:58
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:59
*** devoid has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** xuhanp has quit IRC16:03
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:04
*** jmcbride has quit IRC16:04
*** jrist has quit IRC16:05
*** zhangleiqiang has quit IRC16:08
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:09
*** jtomasek has quit IRC16:10
*** devoid has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
*** eguz has quit IRC16:15
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** eguz has quit IRC16:16
*** eghobo has quit IRC16:17
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** mrodden has quit IRC16:17
*** vponomaryov has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** eguz has quit IRC16:21
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC16:22
*** Barker has quit IRC16:22
*** mdbooth has quit IRC16:24
*** d89 has quit IRC16:25
*** santibaldassin has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:25
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:25
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:27
*** gokrokve has quit IRC16:27
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC16:28
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC16:30
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:30
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
*** banix has quit IRC16:32
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC16:34
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC16:34
*** sballe has quit IRC16:34
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:35
*** SnowDust has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:35
*** venkatesh has quit IRC16:37
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:38
*** hockeynut has quit IRC16:39
*** pdmars has quit IRC16:39
*** jmcbride has quit IRC16:40
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:43
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
*** eghobo has quit IRC16:51
*** dripton has quit IRC16:51
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:52
*** Duane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:54
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:56
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** dripton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** NehaV1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** NehaV1 has quit IRC17:01
*** Duane has quit IRC17:01
*** Duane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC17:02
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk17:03
*** NehaV has quit IRC17:03
*** demorris has quit IRC17:06
*** mwagner_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC17:08
*** Leonr has quit IRC17:08
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
*** eghobo has quit IRC17:11
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
*** Leon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:12
*** eguz has quit IRC17:12
*** caleb_ has quit IRC17:12
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC17:12
*** Leon is now known as Guest5914517:13
*** Leonr has quit IRC17:13
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:13
*** zhangleiqiang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:18
*** NehaV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:22
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:22
*** NehaV1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:22
*** zhangleiqiang has quit IRC17:23
*** Louis_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:23
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
*** NehaV has quit IRC17:26
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC17:26
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:27
*** ErikB has quit IRC17:28
*** Haiying has quit IRC17:28
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:30
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC17:34
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:34
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC17:34
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:35
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:36
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:38
*** eankutse has quit IRC17:39
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:39
*** Louis_ has quit IRC17:40
*** derekh has quit IRC17:40
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC17:40
*** banix has quit IRC17:41
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:43
*** rms_13_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:43
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:44
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC17:44
*** SnowDust has quit IRC17:46
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman17:46
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:47
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:47
*** banix has quit IRC17:49
*** gokrokve has quit IRC17:50
*** dprince_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:50
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:50
*** dprince has quit IRC17:50
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away17:51
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
*** jmcbride1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
*** jmcbride has quit IRC17:52
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:53
*** alazarev has quit IRC17:53
*** banix has quit IRC17:54
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC17:55
*** gokrokve has quit IRC17:55
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** safchain_ has quit IRC17:55
*** vkmc has quit IRC17:56
*** Louis_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** yogesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
*** SnowDust has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
*** Kanzhe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
*** dprince_ has quit IRC18:00
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman18:00
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** prasadv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** youcef_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** kevinconway has quit IRC18:03
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC18:05
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
*** nacim has quit IRC18:06
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
*** caleb_` has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
*** PhilD has quit IRC18:07
*** Kanzhe has quit IRC18:07
*** fouxm has quit IRC18:08
*** Haiying has quit IRC18:08
*** caleb_ has quit IRC18:09
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:11
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC18:13
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
*** IlyaE has quit IRC18:13
*** jmcbride has quit IRC18:13
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:14
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:14
*** jmcbride1 has quit IRC18:14
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:14
*** Haiying has quit IRC18:14
*** OSM has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC18:22
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC18:27
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC18:30
*** thinrichs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
*** hemanthravi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:31
*** gokrokve has quit IRC18:31
*** rramirez has quit IRC18:31
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC18:34
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:34
*** thinrichs has quit IRC18:34
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:35
*** jgallard has quit IRC18:35
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:43
*** jmcbride has quit IRC18:45
*** youcef_ has quit IRC18:45
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
*** mrodden has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:51
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC18:52
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:55
*** Louis_ has quit IRC18:55
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away18:58
*** caleb_` has quit IRC18:58
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
mesteryHi neutron policy folk!19:00
kevinbentono/19:00
mestery#startmeeting networking_policy19:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 20 19:00:48 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mestery. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:00
banixHi Kyle and the rest of policy fanatics :)19:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking_policy'19:00
SumitNaiksatammestery, all: hi!19:00
cgoncalveshi all19:01
mesterybanix: policy fanatics, love it! :)19:01
hemanthravihi19:01
prasadvhi there19:01
mestery#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron_Group_Policy#March_20.2C_2014 Agenda19:01
* mestery considers renaming the meeting "policy fanatics" in honor of banix's comment.19:01
*** mandeep has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
rkukurahi19:01
banix:)19:01
SumitNaiksatammestery banix: +1 :-)19:01
mandeephi19:01
mestery#topic Action Item Review19:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Action Item Review (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:01
*** angdraug has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
mesteryA very light action item review to start today.19:02
*** angdraug has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
rms_13_hello19:02
mesteryJust a note to continue updating the model with SumitNaiksatam for folks who haven't done so already.19:02
SumitNaiksatammestery: we had numerous discussions19:02
*** eankutse has quit IRC19:02
SumitNaiksatammestery: we are making progress19:02
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
mesterySumitNaiksatam: Very good! Was this all updated in your Google doc/ppt?19:03
mesteryIf so, can you #link it here?19:03
SumitNaiksatammestery: yes, and banix has updated as well19:03
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
SumitNaiksatammestery: #link https://docs.google.com/a/noironetworks.com/presentation/d/1Nn1HjghAvk2RTPwvltSrnCUJkidWKWY2ckU7OYAVNpo/edit#slide=id.g1c910cf8b_0019:03
mesteryGreat teamwork!19:03
mestery#link https://docs.google.com/a/noironetworks.com/presentation/d/1Nn1HjghAvk2RTPwvltSrnCUJkidWKWY2ckU7OYAVNpo/edit#slide=id.g1c910cf8b_00 Policy Model Presentation19:03
mesteryThanks SumitNaiksatam!19:03
mestery#topic PoC Brainstorm19:03
*** openstack changes topic to "PoC Brainstorm (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:03
mesteryI thought it would be good to spend the bulk of this meeting agreeing on the use case(s) we want the PoC to cover.19:04
mesteryDoes that sound fair to folks?19:04
SumitNaiksatamyeah19:04
SumitNaiksatamhigh time :-)19:04
prasadvyes19:04
banixyes19:04
mesteryCool. :)19:04
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: sorry for reading the updated doc before the meeting; quickly glanced over, how do I specify qos parameters with the new policy-rule structure?19:04
SumitNaiksatams3wong: still work in progress :-)19:04
mandeepThe prototype use-case in the blueprint is the 3-tier app, should we focus on that as the PoC use case?19:05
banixThe suggestion to have a use case for the PoC, or essentially having a demo we work towards realizing by the summit time is very good19:05
SumitNaiksatams3wong: needless to say, feel free to add your comments (you did a lot of work on the actions earlier)19:05
mesterymandeep: That seems reasonable to me.19:05
*** ywu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:05
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:05
banixI think lets step back a bit19:05
banixwith respect to the Poc19:06
mandeepNote tho' the real value of the policy framework shows up when we start adding the lifecycle events - and they need to be flushed out better19:06
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: yes, I was defining policy-rule originally - the new structure certainly lacks the extensibility that we targeted at that time19:06
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:06
banixwe want to show case the capability of the policy framework, so as such we have to demonstrate why using such a policy makes life easier or better19:06
SumitNaiksatams3wong: ok lets discuss that (as follow up perhaps?)19:06
*** Haiying has quit IRC19:06
SumitNaiksatambanix: +119:06
s3wongdon't get me wrong, a good start nevertheless :-)19:07
mesterybanix: That's ag ood point, aligns with what mandeep is indicating as well.19:07
*** youcef_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
SumitNaiksatambanix: please go on19:07
banixthe three tier case is good case but I think the punch line would be how we end up realizing it in an application centric way19:07
SumitNaiksatambanix: you have some thoughts?19:07
SumitNaiksatambanix: absolutely19:07
mesteryAgreed banix.19:07
SumitNaiksatamso far i think we have been thinking about how we can realize the legacy model using this new model19:08
banixSO I am saying the power should come out as how easy it is for end users/apps define and deploy these policies19:08
mesteryI think both banix and SumitNaiksatam are bringing up good points here.19:08
banixSumitNaiksatam: Agree, which is necessary but we need to go beyond that19:09
mandeepbanix: Yes. Clear sepration on app/infra concerns - and automatic deduction of specific low level details19:09
SumitNaiksatambanix: just typing that its necessary but not sufficient19:09
*** xyang1_ has quit IRC19:09
* SumitNaiksatam thinks banix can mind read :-)19:09
*** ashwini_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:09
banixman deep, SumitNaiksatam: exactly19:09
hemanthravimandeep: by lifecycle events, do you mean adding endpoints into a group and having the policy apply auto19:09
*** ashwini_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:10
mandeephemanthravi: That, and other more dynamic ganges -like new consumers, new infra policy like "inspect all external traffic by IDS", etc19:10
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC19:10
*** Youcef__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:11
*** youcef_ has quit IRC19:11
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC19:12
mesteryOK, so circling back here, do we need to go beyond 3-tier app for the PoC?19:12
mandeepIn particular, with initial app creation, then updating the app policy, updating the infra policy, updating connectivity issues (like subnets, routes, service insertion, etc)19:12
s3wongmandeep: that would be more a UI functions, our Neutron APIs would still be 'redirect' to service that happens to be IDS19:12
*** nbouthors_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:12
prasadvare we saying that we will demo 3 tier model and then show agility of using this for dynamic changes  will show the power of group policy?19:12
s3wongmestery: I would think if we can do end to end 3-tier app for PoC, that would already be very good19:12
banixI think if we demonstrate how easily we can deploy a three tier app with a simple heat template with little reference to the nuts and bolts of "networking"" being used that would be a good start. What do you think? There is a few neat things we can build on top of that but is this a good start? other suggestions?19:12
mandeeps3wong: In the model, you want to do that without impacting the provider contract since that is an app constraint orthogonal to the app concerns19:13
s3wongthat is, from Horizon -> Heat template -> Neutron...etc19:13
mesterys3wong: Fair point, just want to make sure everyone is in agreement on the 3-tier app being enough.19:13
SumitNaiksatams3wong: playing devil's advocate - you can realize the same three tier app using legacy model19:13
mandeepbanix: Sounds interesting, but adds heat to PoC [tho' it might be worth it]19:14
SumitNaiksatami think its good to add heat to the PoC19:14
SumitNaiksatambut we have to be careful here19:14
mestery+1 to adding heat19:14
SumitNaiksatamwe need to show clear separation of concerns19:14
mesteryIt stresses the value of the abstractions we have come up with19:14
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: absolutely. Reference to banix 's presentation back in the I-Summit; instead of using 20 Neutron APIs, we are now using 519:14
mandeepMy concern was not about it being good, but about resources ;-)19:14
mesterymandeep: :)19:15
SumitNaiksatampeople often tend to ask as to whether the policy model is merely orchestration, that can be subsumed in heat19:15
SumitNaiksatami don't agree with that19:15
SumitNaiksatambut if we drive this from heat19:15
*** OSM is now known as songole19:15
mandeepYes, and PoC can answer that question19:15
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: and that most of the construct abstracts out the port/address level knowledge19:15
SumitNaiksatamwe might loose those people19:15
banixs3wong: that's what I was going to add, and in that presentation towards the end there are a couple of things that go beyond simple 3-tier19:15
banixSumitNaiksatam: that is a very good point that point was raised in the summit19:16
prasadvsumitnaiksatam: There is a little bit of overlap with heat though19:16
mandeepbanix: Can you send a link to your presentation?19:16
prasadvwe need to be clear as to the boundaries19:16
banixsure. let me dig it out.19:16
*** lcostantino has quit IRC19:16
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: i agree, and we need to have a crisp understanding of this, which we will, but difficult to convey to others who see this for the first time19:16
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:16
prasadvand yes I like having heat in it answer questions19:16
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs19:17
mandeepprasadv: Yes, that is why we need to be crisp as SumitNaiksatam identified19:17
prasadvparticularly dynamic changes and instantiation19:17
*** lcostantino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:17
SumitNaiksatami would dare to suggest, lets try to bring out the value in this PoC without using Heat19:17
SumitNaiksatamso as not to confuse the audience19:17
banix#link https://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-hong-kong-2013/session-videos/presentation/network-abstraction-at-different-layers-of-the-stack19:17
SumitNaiksatamjust a thought19:17
prasadv+119:17
SumitNaiksatambesides, per mandeep i am not sure we have the resources either19:17
banixwill find the pdf; watching the video may be painful :)19:18
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:18
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: I think using application template as a frontend is one of the major advantages of group-policy, no?19:18
mandeepprasadv: Exactly. It is in dynamic behavior that policy really differentiates over heat type of ochestration19:18
SumitNaiksatamso it might just be infeasible from a resource perspective to do it (in which case we don't have a choice)19:18
mandeepbanix: thanks19:18
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:18
SumitNaiksatams3wong: not disagreeing with that19:18
*** michael-yu has quit IRC19:19
SumitNaiksatams3wong:  but then the policy abstractions are probably lost on the people19:19
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:19
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:19
mesteryIt's a fine balance SumitNaiksatam, I agree.19:19
SumitNaiksatammestery: yeah19:19
banixSumitNaiksatam: what do you suggest that we show? Let's say we do not use heat, you are suggesting something like a 3-tier app or something different?19:19
SumitNaiksatamokay, so i am just thinking loud19:20
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: if not using Heat, we have to pick something else to emphasize (more visually) for people to see the advantage of group-policy19:20
banixmastery, Sumit: yeah I agree, we need be careful of that concern19:20
rms_13_Cant we do primary demo WITHOUT heat to clarify policy concept; and than add heat in a last few minute doing same stuff as a quick video?19:20
banixthat issue will come up as it did during the design session19:20
*** Youcef__ has quit IRC19:20
SumitNaiksatamrms_13_: yes, sure19:20
s3wongrms_13_: interesting suggestion19:21
SumitNaiksatams3wong: visually can be achieved with horizon integration, no?19:21
SumitNaiksatamok, i also don't want us to miss the main point of this discussion, which is the use case19:21
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: perhaps visually is a poor way to say it - to demo the ease of operation via group-policy19:21
banixyes lets focus on the use case19:21
prasadvsumitnaiksatam: we would need a policy builder in UO right?19:21
prasadv*UI19:21
SumitNaiksatamwe can decide on heat or not later19:22
SumitNaiksatamprasadv: well, at least some representation19:22
SumitNaiksatamso coming back to the use case19:22
mandeepWe do have a PoC doc, should this discussion move to that doc?19:22
banixSumitNaiksatam: Please go ahead; Do you have any particular use case in mind19:22
SumitNaiksatammandeep: yeah we can put thoughts on the doc19:23
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: use case?19:23
*** openstack-meetin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:23
rms_13_3-tier app is something which people would relate to very easily as a use case. Solving that end to end + "just mentioning" few more should suffice19:23
SumitNaiksatams3wong banix: it was more of a question19:23
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:24
SumitNaiksatami think 3-tier is good, but the same can be shown with a single tier as well19:24
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: please elaborate19:24
banixso let's develop that single tier use case a bit further19:24
SumitNaiksatams3wong:  i mean the benefits we are trying to show for the policy model19:25
SumitNaiksatams3wong: multiple tiers would be an extension of that19:25
SumitNaiksatambut really, the benefit should be evident even with a single tier19:26
SumitNaiksatami am not saying that we will not show 3-tier19:26
*** Haiying has quit IRC19:26
SumitNaiksatambut for our own understanding, i think we need to flesh out a single tier19:26
SumitNaiksatamworkflow, etc19:26
banixlet's see what we have in that single tier, so we can decide ...19:26
s3wongSumitNaiksatam banix: for those who are interested, the ODL project google doc has TONS of use cases19:27
SumitNaiksatambanix: go ahead19:27
s3wong#link https://docs.google.com/document/d/12Z1JHhCFS6ta-ux3UdUbFaEPzAig_3Xgnbj29Nejfug/edit19:27
SumitNaiksatams3wong: thanks19:27
prasadvi think showing single tier with redirection and allow/deny would be good to show?19:27
* mestery has walked through those use cases far too many times. :P19:27
banixthen we can see if we need to build on it to make it more interesting (assuming we have time to do that)19:27
banixSumit: That was more of a suggestion to you :)19:27
SumitNaiksatammestery: i think stands out to you from venturing there?19:27
SumitNaiksatam*anything19:28
prasadvin a way that is 2 tier - service tier and app tier19:28
banixprasadv: that makse more sense19:28
mesterySumitNaiksatam: I think we should try to keep it simple at first to prove the points as you say, then see how far we can take it. Sound good?19:28
banixI think that is probably what Sumit and others mean by a single tier19:28
mandeepagreed19:28
banixmestery: yes19:28
prasadvso internal users go through simpler service tier and external users go through more secure tier?19:28
mesteryAgreed banix19:29
mandeepprasadv: yes19:29
prasadvwe show case tags, classifers etc19:29
s3wongprasadv: that probably already requires labels, right?19:29
prasadvnot tags but labels19:29
banixlet's not get into details of how we do it19:29
mesteryYes, the doc can have details right?19:29
nbouthors_that looks like a data center access use case19:29
banixright, let's focus on what we want to demo such that we showcase the power of policies. makes sense?19:30
mandeepmestery: banix: Yes, let move this to doc, IRC is probably not the best way to work out the PoC details19:30
prasadvnbouthers_: it is application deployment use case19:30
mestery#action Team to flesh out PoC details in doc19:30
banixthen we go back to work as how we can realize that demo19:30
mesterymandeep: Do you have the link for that doc we can post here?19:30
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk19:31
mandeepmestery: let me get it.19:31
mesteryThanks mandeep!19:31
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:31
s3wonghttps://docs.google.com/a/midokura.com/document/d/14UyvBkptmrxB9FsWEP8PEGv9kLqTQbsmlRxnqeF9Be8/edit19:31
s3wonghere it is :-)19:31
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:31
*** youcef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:31
s3wongthe great PoC doc :-)19:31
mandeep#link https://docs.google.com/a/noironetworks.com/document/d/14UyvBkptmrxB9FsWEP8PEGv9kLqTQbsmlRxnqeF9Be8/edit19:31
SumitNaiksatams3wong: thanks :-)19:31
banixs3wong: thanks19:32
s3wongwith about 5 lines of text :-)19:32
mesteryThanks s3wong and mandeep!19:32
mesteryHa!19:32
mestery:)19:32
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:32
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:32
*** hockeynut has quit IRC19:32
SumitNaiksatamif you have to make a start somewhere :-)19:32
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: as you can see we had no idea what we wanted to demo :-)19:32
*** caleb_ has quit IRC19:33
*** alazarev has quit IRC19:33
banixyeah, so prasadv: can you elaborate as the use case you mentioned19:33
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:33
mesterys3wong: :)19:33
banixs/as/about19:33
SumitNaiksatams3wong: i guess its called evolution :-)19:33
SumitNaiksatamorganic evolution19:33
prasadvbanix: I was thinking we can deploy  a app tier say lamp stack with redirection to service layer19:33
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:33
prasadvsay a firewall19:34
banixprasadv: thanks19:34
prasadvjust thinking aloud around single tier showcase19:35
cgoncalvesprasadv: or firewall+lb? :-)19:35
s3wongthinking outloud for PoC timeframe - API we can do whatever we want, so the limiting factor is OVS19:35
prasadvcgoncalves: yes, some appliance(s)19:35
s3wongprasadv 's suggestion seems to be feasible for OVS support POV19:35
banixI think with a use case like the above we may run into ta question like: couldn't you do that today, using fwaas for example19:35
s3wongbanix: true, it is also not really "application" perspective...19:36
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:36
mandeepbanix: You could. The claim is that it is a higher level description on intent that may be realized using existing capabilities (or we can create new ones)19:37
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:37
prasadvi am hoping it to be more than Fwaas with connectivity groups, Allow/deny19:37
banixmandeep: yes, exactly, somehow we have to showcase that aspect of what we are doing19:38
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC19:38
mandeepbanix: Agreed19:38
banixUsing Heat is a convincing option (again assuming we have time to get there); if not what other options do we have19:38
banixjust asking the question19:39
s3wonguse case should be from user perspective. So it should start with "I am an app owner, I want to deploy an app...19:39
SumitNaiksatami think of to consider the "app developer" role19:39
SumitNaiksatam* i think we have to19:39
prasadvs3wong:  I agree19:39
banixprasadv: I think a single firewall would be fine, the point that we need to demonstrate is how we get to deploy it19:39
SumitNaiksatams3wong: exactly19:39
SumitNaiksatamlets not get into the capabilities of services19:40
banixs3wong: agrees19:40
mandeepSumitNaiksatam: Agreed19:40
SumitNaiksatami think that is bit orthogonal19:40
SumitNaiksatammandeep earlier mentioned about lifecycle events19:40
banixyes, the service itself not that important19:40
banixany service would do; even one i think is fine19:40
SumitNaiksatami think that is tied into the "app developer's" role19:40
SumitNaiksatamin the sense that, what he has to do today with the legacy abstractions19:41
SumitNaiksatamversus what he would have to do with the new policy abstractions19:41
banixcan you state the lifecyle events again19:41
SumitNaiksatami will conveniently punt that to mandeep :-P19:41
banixor I can go back above and read what you had said :)19:41
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: agree - very simply, if I add a VM into my application pool, I need to connect vport to network, update security group...etc19:42
mandeep1. Create (where the intent is expressed and low level automation is done)19:42
SumitNaiksatams3wong: yes, nicely put19:42
rms_13_Just thinking loud here: would it make sense to create a video of achieving our use-case by today's model. Than explaining and demoing ease/differentiation policy provides for doing same thing?19:42
s3wongnow you can simply do it via automatically adding the new VM vport in a EPG19:42
mandeep2. Update app behavior - Say updates to contarcts19:42
mandeep3. Updates to infrastructure19:42
SumitNaiksatamrms_13_: good point, we should19:42
mandeep4. Dynamic binding19:42
banixrms_13_: sure but lets see what use case we pick first19:42
mestery+1 to that rms_13_.19:43
mandeep5. Infrastructure based modulation (say QoS or path selection or service selection)19:43
SumitNaiksatammandeep: perhaps you can add to the doc, i think we all need to be on the same on this basic understanding19:43
*** SnowDust has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:43
mandeepYes, I will do that19:44
banixSo I had this simple example, would that be a simple case of what you are describing' this example:19:44
SumitNaiksatamcurrently we don't have a "app developer" role in neutron19:44
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:44
SumitNaiksatammandeep: thanks19:44
SumitNaiksatambanix: go ahead19:44
prasadvmaybe we should have an action item to have couple of proposals presented by individuals or groups next week19:45
* s3wong waiting on banix... :-)19:45
banixYou specify a policy where you employ a loadbalancer between two groups (a provider and a consumer in new model); then adding a new endpoint to the group will automatically lead to the loadbalancer to adding it to its pool19:45
* banix is slow19:46
* SumitNaiksatam knew banix was coming up with something deep19:46
s3wongbanix: that seems to require us to add members to the pool for an LBaaS instance19:46
s3wongwhich isn't one of our defined actions at this point...19:47
SumitNaiksatams3wong: loadbalancer config will be required but thats orthogonal19:47
*** Duane has quit IRC19:47
banixs3wong: yes but the point is you don't do it (at the user level), it happens because of the policy being there19:47
SumitNaiksatambanix: i think you will still required the LB config19:47
SumitNaiksatam*require19:47
*** Duane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:47
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
s3wongbanix: but how is it represented by what we have in group-policy today - that is, how do I set up such contract?19:48
SumitNaiksatambanix: but there is still value here19:48
banixyes to all the above but that is the type of thing lifecycle events man deep was explaining would do?19:48
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC19:49
SumitNaiksatambanix: true, perhaps not use the loadbalancer19:49
SumitNaiksatambanix: just say, add another VM to the end point group?19:49
banixexactly19:49
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan19:50
SumitNaiksatambanix: or another end point, that is19:50
banixthat's what I said or thought i was saying19:50
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: now that makes sense, as a new endpoint to EPG will automatically get the new endpoint to inherit all the policy atrributes19:50
banix"then adding a new endpoint to the group "19:50
mandeepbanix: I think we need to get this all in doc, there are too many issues here to get into on the IRC (I am an IRC newbie)19:50
banix"will automatically lead to"19:51
banixyes19:51
SumitNaiksatammandeep: yeah, difficult to do this without diagrams :-)19:51
s3wongor whiteboard :-)19:51
banixso the question is not this particular example but is this what we want to aim for19:51
banixthis type of capability, i mean19:52
mesteryOK, so at this point, should we just focus on getting this into the doc?19:52
SumitNaiksatamyeah, i think banix is validating the understanding of "lifecycle events"19:52
mesteryIt seems we have only 8 minutes left anyways. :)19:52
openstack-meetinI have writeup of  mucb of this tbat Im drafting for ODL GBP and ONF NBI ( how gbp info model achieves a bunch ofuse cases)19:52
s3wongbanix: yes, this simple use case should demostrate ease of operation of GBP19:52
prasadvmestery: can we move this meeting up an hour?19:52
mandeepbanix: Yes, we need to aim to show value as you identified, but I think we are getting mixed up with the scope issues (say LBaaS is included in POC or not)19:52
prasadvfor people who are making trek to noiro for ODL group policy meeting19:53
mesteryprasadv: OK, let me look into that.19:53
mestery#action mestery to look at moving meeting up one hour.19:53
s3wongHmm... what is openstack-meetin talking about? I am a bit lost19:53
mesterys3wong: Same here.19:53
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC19:53
prasadvmestery:thanks19:54
SumitNaiksatamopenstack-meetin: can you identify yourself? ;-P19:54
s3wongprasadv: amazing, I am OK with the time - being in the ODL meeting couple minutes late isn't a big deal - as webex setup typically takes that much time anyway :-)19:54
openstack-meetinSorry dave lenrow, new irc client19:54
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:54
banixOpenstack-meetin: I am what controls everything from behind the scene: I am openstack!19:55
banixjust kidding19:55
mesteryHa! I like the nic openstack-meetin ;)19:55
mesteryOK, 5 minutes left folks.19:55
banixAlmost out of time19:55
mesteryShould we move to the document at this point?19:55
mestery#topic Closing Thoughts19:55
*** openstack changes topic to "Closing Thoughts (Meeting topic: networking_policy)"19:55
s3wongmestery: absolutely19:55
*** caleb_` has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:55
mesteryOK, cool.19:55
*** openstack-meetin is now known as dlenrow19:55
banixyes but we need to close on this rather quickly. right?19:55
SumitNaiksatamdlenrow: welcome!19:56
s3wongI will work with SumitNaiksatam on policy-rule definition refinement19:56
SumitNaiksatambanix: agree19:56
dlenrowI want to get doc aligned to neutron GBP POC work19:56
mesterydlenrow: That's a good goal!19:56
s3wongdlenrow: which doc?19:57
banixdlenrow: any loiters will be helpful19:57
banixpointers19:57
SumitNaiksatamdlenrow: which doc are you referring to?19:57
*** caleb_ has quit IRC19:57
dlenrowDoc Im drafting for ODL GBP (next call)19:57
mestery:)19:58
mandeepdlenrow: Got it19:58
* s3wong has no idea there is another doc for ODL project, but whatever :-)19:58
mesterys3wong: Docs for everyone! :P19:58
mesteryOK, lets call this meeting now.19:58
mesteryLets get the PoC use case doc finished for next week's meeting if we can.19:59
mesterySound good?19:59
banixlet's work on the poc use case through email19:59
SumitNaiksatamyeah19:59
s3wongmestery: as you know, we started off with a doc which now points to another doc :-)19:59
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
*** prasadv has quit IRC19:59
*** hemanthravi has quit IRC19:59
mesterys3wong: Doc abstraction :)19:59
SumitNaiksatams3wong: lol!19:59
mesteryOK, thanks folks!19:59
mestery#endmeeting19:59
*** jmcbride has quit IRC19:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:59
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 20 19:59:29 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-03-20-19.00.html19:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-03-20-19.00.txt19:59
s3wongthanks guys!19:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_policy/2014/networking_policy.2014-03-20-19.00.log.html19:59
*** songole has quit IRC19:59
SumitNaiksatamsee you in a bit guys ;-)19:59
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting-alt19:59
s3wongSumitNaiksatam: see you in 10 minutes :-)19:59
*** caleb_` has quit IRC20:00
SumitNaiksatams3wong: ;-P20:00
banixor 15?20:00
s3wongbanix: depends on traffic :-)20:00
banixI see :)20:00
s3wongout :-)20:00
*** s3wong has quit IRC20:00
banixso you guys are that close to each other; assuming you don't do IRC while driving!20:00
banixbye20:00
*** alazarev has quit IRC20:01
mandeepbanix: we can do hangout20:01
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
banixmandeep: yes, lets do that20:01
*** ashwini_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
banixmandeep: will you be taking the initiative to schedule that?20:02
*** markwash has quit IRC20:02
mandeepbanix: Yes, either me or SumitNaiksatam will do that.20:02
mandeepbanix: ok, bye20:02
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
banixmandeep: ok thanks20:03
*** mandeep has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** eguz has quit IRC20:03
*** eghobo has quit IRC20:03
*** youcef has quit IRC20:03
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:05
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:05
*** soniarvind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:06
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:06
*** rramirez has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:07
*** soniarvind has quit IRC20:08
markwash#startmeeting glance20:10
openstackMeeting started Thu Mar 20 20:10:20 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is markwash. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:10
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:10
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: glance)"20:10
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'glance'20:10
ameadelol20:10
gokrokve:-)20:10
markwashSorry folks, I accidentally started the meeting in the wrong room20:10
nikhil__o/20:10
ameademan how did we all miss that?20:10
arnaud__hello :)20:10
markwashquick roll call for the eavesdrop logs20:10
gokrokveI usually monitor both20:10
markwasho/20:10
gokrokve\o20:10
markwashokay great20:11
markwashSo, as I mentioned in the other room, lets quickly form an agenda for today20:11
ameademarkwash: so i think i am going to start pushing for the 'brick' library to get out of cinder and then help zhiyan with the cinder store code at some point20:12
gokrokve*) Glance V2 state and future20:12
arnaud__Nova new blueprint process: applicable for glance?20:12
*** tinoue has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:13
markwashother items before we get started ?20:13
*** jmcbride has quit IRC20:13
markwash(items to add to the agenda)20:13
markwashokay! I'll ask again when we finish20:13
gokrokveok20:13
markwashif you don't mind, lets learn about the blueprint stuff first20:14
markwash#topic new nova blueprint process (arnaud__)20:14
*** openstack changes topic to "new nova blueprint process (arnaud__) (Meeting topic: glance)"20:14
*** michael-yu has quit IRC20:14
markwasharnaud__: floor is yours, please inform us20:14
arnaud__so the idea is to use gerrit20:14
arnaud__Russel sent an email a few hours ago20:14
arnaud__https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Nova20:15
arnaud__http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova-specs/tree/template.rst20:15
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:15
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs20:16
markwashinteresting idea20:16
nikhil__wow, like the last link20:16
markwashshould we take a look at the ML and other resources and revisit it next meeting?20:16
arnaud__sounds good20:16
markwashI think we all know there is a lot left to be desired by the current blueprint process, even with my attempt at a polish-up20:17
ameade+120:17
arnaud__my feeling is that I like the idea, but I think having 1 process for 1 O/S project and a different one for all the others is a bit weird20:17
*** dprince has quit IRC20:17
arnaud__let's continue this next week then20:17
markwasharnaud__: thanks for bringing it to our attention!20:18
markwash#topic brick driver (ameade)20:18
*** openstack changes topic to "brick driver (ameade) (Meeting topic: glance)"20:18
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:18
markwashameade: floor is yours if you can elaborate a bit on your update20:18
ameadeso basically, this bp has been around for awhile: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/glance-cinder-driver20:18
*** jmcbride has quit IRC20:19
ameadeit seems the only blocker for it's completion is the Brick library20:19
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:19
ameadewhich is the attach/detach code currently in cinder20:19
ameadei just want to make sure we are good with the plan before i push this as a use case for brick20:19
markwashameade: there is a little issue that I'm worried about there, maybe we can help resolve it to clarify this blueprint20:20
markwashcinder will only store raw images, right?20:20
ameademarkwash: actually it will not care about the bits and act soley as a store20:20
markwashah20:21
ameadefor image upload it would create a volume, attach to the volume, upload the image bits20:21
zhiyanameade: iirc, i think there are three steps to make cinder-store be normal: 1. brick lib. 2. multi-attaching 3. store enhancements (add add(), delete() and etc. )20:21
markwashif I upload a qcow2 to glance, and we want to use the cinder driver, what does it do?20:21
ameadei do think however that if someone did upload a 'raw' image it could then lead to more enhancements such as no copy boot from volume20:21
ameademarkwash: it would just be a cinder volume with the qcow2 bits in it20:22
arnaud__ameade: do you know what is done/need to be done in for the brick library?20:22
ameadezhiyan: +1, multi-attach for brick is also a blocker20:22
ameadearnaud__: I don't know all the details but i think it boils down to talking with jgriffith (cinder ptl), ripping the code out, and supporting multiple attaching to volumes20:23
arnaud__ok20:23
zhiyanameade: and as we discussed, if we want to go "second" way, I think there's no any enhancement be needed on glance side.20:23
markwashameade: I guess I don't see why we would want to store qcow2 bits in a cinder volume exactly. . since then I guess we wouldn't be able to attach or boot the cinder volume20:24
ameadezhiyan: correct, the 'second' way being nova using brick directly20:24
ameademarkwash: it just wouldn't be a bootable volume at that point20:24
markwashI guess what I'm getting at is that cinder seems to depend on supporting multiformat images20:25
ameadebut it would open up storing images on a ton of block storage backends20:25
zhiyanameade: hmm, actually in nova side, even we have not brick, we could leverage existing volumes.py directly, those are existing volume attachment code20:25
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk20:25
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8720:25
*** dlenrow has quit IRC20:25
*** sarob has quit IRC20:26
ameademarkwash: why is that exactly?20:26
markwashit just seems uneven if we make a store that works specially with raw images formats20:26
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:26
markwashespecially since we might like to store the same image in qcow2 on swift and in raw on cinder20:27
*** lenrow has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:27
zhiyani'm a little confused, i think there's no any limitation on image formation. volume can save any bits of image,20:27
markwashso I'm just wondering if it makes more sense to actually pull out the cinder driver and then figure out how to do it over with multiformat images20:27
*** jmcbride has quit IRC20:27
markwashzhiyan: but your goal is zero copy boot, right?20:28
*** julim has quit IRC20:28
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:28
zhiyanmarkwash: that's any other topic, for example, with image-handler support, we can do zero-copy provisioning with glance-vmware-store20:28
zhiyanmarkwash: but on the same time, glance-vmware-store can support original provisioning approach: downloading20:29
markwashit feels a bit of a special case to have a client side logic that says "if location type = X and format = Y: do something amazing; else: do something normal"20:30
markwasha bit *too* special20:30
zhiyanmarkwash: IMO, iiuc, there's any assumption on store level20:30
*** eanxgeek is now known as eanxgeek|log20:30
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:30
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:31
*** sarob has quit IRC20:31
ameademarkwash: i think even if we ignore the super awesome special case there is still value to storing images in cinder20:31
zhiyanmarkwash: even we go this logic on client, i think it is: "if location type = X" (no format = Y)20:31
zhiyanameade: +120:31
*** bcrochet has quit IRC20:31
zhiyanthere's no any direct relationship, iiuc20:31
markwashameade: but in that case, why just images? shouldn't we work on making cinder drivers work as backends to swift somehow?20:31
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs20:32
zhiyanswift is a object storage but *block*20:32
gokrokveI actually have a question from our team about ceph20:32
gokrokveThay were trying to add ceph support to nova to boot from ceph storage20:32
*** jmcbride has quit IRC20:32
markwashzhiyan: right, but the store is an abstraction to object storage, not block storage20:32
markwasha qcow2 is an object, not a block20:32
gokrokvebut now they have to rebase their changes together with nova on Glance v2 api20:33
zhiyani think the original idea of cinder store is to make glance support different block storage as single20:33
*** bcrochet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
zhiyanqcow2 is a block device image20:33
markwashright, so if I read a qcow2 file, I can produce a block device abstraction from it20:33
markwashbut the file is a file is an object20:33
zhiyaninteresting idea20:34
markwashI can't encode a block Foo as qcow2, upload it to cinder, and then use it as the block Foo. . I can only use to read the file Foo.qcow220:34
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:35
*** banix has quit IRC20:35
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:35
markwashto me its fine to allow raw images in the glance cinder store20:36
markwashand thats' consistent with what we were trying to achieve with the cinder store20:36
markwashbut putting any other format is not appropriate20:36
markwashbecause it doesn't fit the expectations of being a block device20:36
ameadei can see where you are coming from20:37
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:37
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:37
ameadeit's kind of a hack20:37
markwashif we made something like "cinder_location" that wasn't a store location, then we could accomplish this hack a bit more cleanly20:37
*** rwsu has quit IRC20:37
zhiyanwe can store that qcow2 *file* to s3/swift object storage *or* storage store, like filesystem20:38
markwashall we really want is metadata to the client that says "this image is already stored as a block device <here>"20:38
zhiyansome of those stores which current glance supported are object store, and some are block store (except cinder), am i right?20:39
zhiyanmarkwash: iiuc, this way should be cover by multi-location?20:39
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:39
markwashzhiyan: I don't think it should really be covered by multi-location either, because we need to distinguish between replica locations that are different just for network performance, and alternative formats that are available20:40
markwashand this is partly represented by the fact that currently the format is an attribute of the image, not the locaiton20:40
markwashand there is not a backwards compatible migration path to move format from the image to the location20:40
zhiyanmarkwash: ok let's say multi-location for the same format image case.20:41
markwashso for v2, i think we should add something like "volume location" as metadata and just put cinder or other use cases through that metadata20:41
markwashwould that idea work and help unblock the core use cases of zero copy boot ?20:42
markwashameade: though I guess you have some other use cases like being able to use netapp as your backing store, right?20:42
zhiyanmarkwash: hum..i believe the original cinder-store idea is that try to use a single store to enable more block backend storage supporting for glance, in short it might leverage cinder capabilities for glance, and de-duplicate store driver implementations20:43
ameademarkwash: yeah, i think maybe we should get back to this next week20:43
markwashameade: yeah, I'd love to sit down with you sometime before then to make sure I understand and properly appreciate your goals, I don't want to just be negative like this :-)20:44
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC20:44
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:44
zhiyanit will be cool if someone could let me know the whole picture20:44
ameademarkwash: yeah definitely, it's good to think through these concerns :)20:44
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:45
*** michael-yu has quit IRC20:45
markwashzhiyan: that's interesting, maybe we can separate that use case out from the zero-copy use case and present things a bit differently20:45
*** fouxm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:45
*** rms_13_ has quit IRC20:45
markwashbut perhaps we should move on20:45
markwashzhiyan: would you like a chance to meet about this next week as well?20:46
zhiyanyes!20:46
*** mwagner_ has quit IRC20:46
zhiyanand i'd like to know the whole use case before meeting disucssion20:46
markwashokay, lets follow up20:47
markwashnext topic for today20:47
markwash#topic Glance V2 state and future (gokrokve)20:47
*** openstack changes topic to "Glance V2 state and future (gokrokve) (Meeting topic: glance)"20:47
gokrokveYes.20:47
markwashcare to introduce it, gokrokve20:47
gokrokveI just want to understand will it be changed significantly in Juno?20:48
gokrokveI am aware of one chnage related to artifacts.20:48
*** fcarpenter has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:48
gokrokveBut as I see there are discussions about locations support.20:48
markwashgokrokve: plans are still a bit unclear I suppose20:49
gokrokveWe have a team who tryed to add ceph support to nova to boot directly from ceph volume.20:49
markwashtaking a look at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/future I think I see mostly tasks stuff in addition to the artifacts20:49
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC20:49
gokrokveThey asked me either they can rebase theis patches on current Glance v2 and do nova migration to Glance v2, or they should wait for V2 is stable.20:49
arnaud__gokrokve: do you plan to use the image handler?20:50
markwashgokrokve: I think glance v2 core functionality will not change, and we are committed to backwards compatibility20:50
zhiyangokrokve: i'm not sure we are doing similar things for zero-copy provisiong for ceph backend.20:51
gokrokveHeh I got this question 30 minutes ago. I have no ide how it works. Probably with image handler.20:51
arnaud__gokrokve: I think from the nova perspective it becomes high priority to support v1 and v2 (back to esheffie1d bp)20:51
gokrokveThey need to support nova locations and Glance v2.20:51
zhiyangokrokve: actually there already has a rbd image handler, but yse arnaud__, i'm working on v2 stuff with esheffie1d (and next step is tempest cases for that corner)20:52
gokrokvearnaud__: Yes. It was a comment for their patch to align with Glance v2 support in nova.20:52
zhiyangokrokve: may i know the review link for that patch?20:52
*** marun has quit IRC20:53
gokrokvezhiyan: rbd handler was here but it work somehow indirectly. Our guys added dirrect copy from ceph or boot from ceph without copy.20:53
*** jmcbride has quit IRC20:53
gokrokveI will sent it ot glance channel. I don't have it right now.20:53
gokrokveI will send it to the glance channel. I don't have it right now.20:53
zhiyangokrokve: tbh i don't think so sorry, that handler already could support *zero* copy20:54
gokrokveok20:54
zhiyangokrokve: thanks for the link20:54
gokrokveProbaly this is about something else. I don't know all the details.20:54
*** bswartz has quit IRC20:55
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
markwashyes I think reviewing that patch would be the best move for us20:55
*** lcostantino has quit IRC20:55
markwashmaybe we can try to hash it out there, or better understand the questions20:55
markwashokay, quick open discussion in case there are any more announcements / other business20:55
*** tedchang has quit IRC20:56
markwash#topic open discussion20:56
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: glance)"20:56
markwash#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/030444.html20:56
markwash. . just sayin' ;-)20:56
arnaud__yeah :)20:56
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk20:56
markwashanother quick ML link20:57
markwash#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/029402.html20:57
markwashI don't quite feel comfortable saying it on ML20:57
markwashbut I think the idea about constructive conversations is a really good one, personally20:57
markwashI know I have failed many of you many times by not first seeking to fully understand an idea20:57
*** krtaylor has quit IRC20:57
markwashI think the thread there moved a bit in the direction of a whitewash20:58
markwashbut I would encourage anyone who feels similarly to kgriffs to consider that and to bring up their concerns where they feel comfortable20:58
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman20:58
markwashanyway, enough touchy-feely20:58
markwash:-)20:58
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
markwashgot to run! thanks everybody!20:59
markwash#endmeeting20:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:59
openstackMeeting ended Thu Mar 20 20:59:07 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-03-20-20.10.html20:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-03-20-20.10.txt20:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2014/glance.2014-03-20-20.10.log.html20:59
kgriffsmarkwash: thanks, man. FWIW, I would not have started that thread if I hadn't talked to a LOT of community members who felt similarly.20:59
*** nacim has quit IRC21:00
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
*** ken1ohmichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:02
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:03
*** demorris has quit IRC21:03
*** drray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:03
zehicleRefStack meeting is on #openstack-meeting-321:03
*** fcarpenter has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:03
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:04
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk21:05
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
*** jaypipes has quit IRC21:07
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:09
*** sarob has quit IRC21:10
*** greghaynes has quit IRC21:11
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** ywu has quit IRC21:13
*** ywu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:13
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:14
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC21:14
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:15
*** rudrarugge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:15
*** ijw has quit IRC21:16
*** ywu has quit IRC21:20
*** ywu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:20
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC21:24
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:25
*** tedchang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:26
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8721:27
*** caleb_ has quit IRC21:27
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:28
*** banix has quit IRC21:29
*** lblanchard has quit IRC21:31
*** jmcbride has quit IRC21:32
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:32
*** jmcbride1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:33
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC21:34
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk21:34
*** Duane has quit IRC21:35
*** Duane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:36
*** esker has quit IRC21:36
*** jmcbride has quit IRC21:37
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:37
*** NehaV1 has quit IRC21:38
*** alazarev has quit IRC21:45
*** ameade has quit IRC21:47
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:47
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:48
*** gokrokve has quit IRC21:52
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:52
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:52
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_21:55
*** IlyaE has quit IRC21:55
*** gokrokve has quit IRC21:56
*** rramirez has quit IRC21:57
*** rramirez has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:59
*** Barker has quit IRC21:59
*** caleb_ has quit IRC22:00
*** Duane has quit IRC22:03
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:07
*** atiwari has quit IRC22:08
*** Guest59145 has quit IRC22:14
*** betsy has quit IRC22:15
*** ashwini_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:16
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:18
*** lenrow has quit IRC22:19
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:19
*** lenrow has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:20
*** khyati has quit IRC22:20
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:20
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:21
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:21
*** caleb_` has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:22
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:23
*** nbouthors_ has quit IRC22:23
*** caleb_` has quit IRC22:23
*** eankutse has quit IRC22:24
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:24
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC22:25
*** caleb_ has quit IRC22:25
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:26
*** jmcbride1 has quit IRC22:29
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC22:29
*** jergerber has quit IRC22:30
*** khyati has quit IRC22:35
*** ken1ohmichi has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:35
*** michael-yu has quit IRC22:37
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:38
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:38
*** samstav has quit IRC22:38
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:39
*** jmcbride has quit IRC22:42
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC22:46
*** rramirez has quit IRC22:47
*** ywu has quit IRC22:49
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:49
*** ywu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:49
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8722:50
*** yogesh has quit IRC22:51
*** walker_ has quit IRC22:54
*** rudrarugge has quit IRC22:57
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:57
*** samstav has quit IRC22:59
*** gokrokve has quit IRC23:00
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:01
*** tanisdl has quit IRC23:01
*** khyati has quit IRC23:02
*** gokrokve has quit IRC23:05
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:05
*** tinoue has quit IRC23:06
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC23:06
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:07
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk23:07
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:07
*** rockyg has quit IRC23:08
*** tanisdl has quit IRC23:12
*** richm has quit IRC23:13
*** michael-yu has quit IRC23:14
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:15
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:19
*** banix has quit IRC23:19
*** khyati has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:21
*** samstav has quit IRC23:21
*** rpodolyaka1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:22
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:23
*** sarob has quit IRC23:26
*** rpodolyaka1 has quit IRC23:26
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:26
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:27
*** sarob has quit IRC23:31
*** alazarev has quit IRC23:31
*** david-lyle has quit IRC23:31
*** bdpayne has quit IRC23:32
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:34
*** mwagner_notHere has quit IRC23:37
*** ywu has quit IRC23:43
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:43
*** ywu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:43
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:45
*** ywu has quit IRC23:47
*** ywu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:48
*** samstav has quit IRC23:49
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:51
*** amytron has quit IRC23:55
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC23:56
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:57
*** eghobo has quit IRC23:57
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:57
*** julienvey has quit IRC23:57
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:57
*** rockyg has quit IRC23:58
*** kevinconway has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!