Thursday, 2016-12-15

*** tonanhngo has quit IRC00:01
*** Swami_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:01
*** fnaval has quit IRC00:01
*** Swami has quit IRC00:05
*** baoli has quit IRC00:05
*** neilus has quit IRC00:05
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:06
*** Swami__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:08
*** stingaci_ has quit IRC00:08
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC00:10
*** Swami_ has quit IRC00:11
*** ijw has quit IRC00:21
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:21
*** ijw has quit IRC00:26
*** lamt has quit IRC00:35
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:39
*** kfarr has quit IRC00:42
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:42
*** gouthamr has quit IRC00:45
*** ijw has quit IRC00:48
*** hongbin has quit IRC00:52
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:53
*** shu-mutou-AWAY is now known as shu-mutou00:54
*** stingaci has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:55
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC00:57
*** Marcellin__ has quit IRC00:59
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:00
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:03
*** dtardivel has quit IRC01:04
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC01:05
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:07
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC01:13
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:13
*** yamahata_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:24
*** ijw has quit IRC01:24
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:25
*** mtan_____ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:26
*** stingaci_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:26
*** mtanino has quit IRC01:27
*** stingaci has quit IRC01:29
*** mtan_____ has quit IRC01:31
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:32
*** stingaci_ has quit IRC01:36
*** kevo has quit IRC01:37
*** bana_k has quit IRC01:38
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:47
*** stingaci has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:50
*** stingaci has quit IRC01:51
*** stingaci has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:51
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC01:54
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:56
*** pleia2 has left #openstack-meeting-alt01:57
*** StanLagu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:01
*** StanLagun has quit IRC02:03
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:11
*** sdake_ has quit IRC02:14
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:17
*** ijw has quit IRC02:19
*** stingaci has quit IRC02:21
*** stingaci has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:21
*** stingaci_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:22
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC02:22
*** stingaci has quit IRC02:25
*** fzdarsky_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:25
*** stingaci_ has quit IRC02:27
*** fzdarsky|afk has quit IRC02:29
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:31
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:32
*** knangia has quit IRC02:40
*** StanLagu_ has quit IRC02:48
*** ansmith has quit IRC02:51
*** StanLagun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:52
*** sdake has quit IRC02:52
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:53
*** tuanluong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:59
*** harlowja has quit IRC03:03
*** bobmel has quit IRC03:04
*** pvaneck has quit IRC03:06
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:07
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC03:12
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:15
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:22
*** StanLagun has quit IRC03:24
*** StanLagun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:26
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC03:26
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC03:34
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC03:37
*** markvoelker has quit IRC03:49
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:00
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:06
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck04:06
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:08
*** ccamacho has quit IRC04:09
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC04:13
*** Ablu has quit IRC04:25
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:26
*** StanLagun has quit IRC04:27
*** chhavi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:31
*** JRobinson__ is now known as JRobinson__afk04:32
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax04:46
*** StanLagun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:47
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:51
*** ijw has quit IRC04:51
*** markvoelker has quit IRC04:55
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:56
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC04:56
*** StanLagun has quit IRC04:59
*** StanLagun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:05
*** hongbin has quit IRC05:10
*** JRobinson__afk is now known as JRobinson__05:10
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK05:12
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax05:17
*** noama has quit IRC05:28
*** noama has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:28
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:31
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan05:32
*** nadya has quit IRC05:35
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:38
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:39
*** dhellmann has quit IRC05:39
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC05:39
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:39
*** ijw_ has quit IRC05:44
*** knangia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:48
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:54
*** Swami__ has quit IRC06:00
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:01
*** ijw has quit IRC06:06
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:10
*** rossella_s has quit IRC06:11
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:11
*** iyamahat has quit IRC06:22
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:29
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:34
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC06:39
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:42
*** pgadiya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:49
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:51
*** markvoelker has quit IRC06:56
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:57
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC06:58
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:07
*** mjura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:08
*** beisner has quit IRC07:12
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:13
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:14
*** StanLagun has quit IRC07:14
*** mjura has quit IRC07:14
*** mjura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:15
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC07:18
*** yamahata_ has quit IRC07:19
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:22
*** stanchan has quit IRC07:22
*** lpetrut has quit IRC07:24
*** msimonin has quit IRC07:24
*** nmagnezi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:31
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:40
*** beisner has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:44
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:48
*** korzen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:52
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC07:54
*** andreas_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:55
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:02
*** iyamahat has quit IRC08:02
*** bana_k has quit IRC08:02
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC08:04
*** kei_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:05
*** kei has quit IRC08:06
*** lpetrut has quit IRC08:09
*** kei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:10
*** apetrich has quit IRC08:11
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:12
*** kei_ has quit IRC08:13
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:15
*** jamesgu has quit IRC08:19
*** florianf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:20
*** shu-mutou has quit IRC08:21
*** kevo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:23
*** mbirru has quit IRC08:24
*** mbirru has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:26
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:30
*** msimonin has quit IRC08:31
*** rmart04 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:32
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:33
*** kei has quit IRC08:37
*** dsariel has quit IRC08:37
*** kevo has quit IRC08:39
*** mbirru has quit IRC08:42
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:43
*** mbirru has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:46
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:48
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC08:50
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:51
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:52
*** dkehn has quit IRC08:54
*** kei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:54
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off08:55
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:56
*** kei has quit IRC08:58
*** markvoelker has quit IRC08:58
*** panda|zZ is now known as panda09:01
*** kei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:02
*** kei has quit IRC09:07
*** dkehn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:08
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:12
*** tremble has quit IRC09:12
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:12
*** mbirru has quit IRC09:19
*** mbirru has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:20
*** mbirru has quit IRC09:23
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:23
*** mbirru has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:24
*** jchhatbar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:28
*** chhavi has quit IRC09:30
*** janki has quit IRC09:31
*** ricolin has quit IRC09:34
*** fzdarsky_ is now known as fzdarsky09:42
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:45
*** lpetrut1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:47
*** nadya has quit IRC09:48
*** lpetrut has quit IRC09:49
*** lpetrut1 is now known as lpetrut09:49
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:52
*** chhavi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:52
*** clopez has quit IRC09:57
*** clopez has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:03
*** ralonsoh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:05
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:08
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC10:08
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC10:15
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away10:15
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:17
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan10:17
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC10:17
*** tpsilva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:20
*** Ablu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:25
*** ralonsoh__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:27
*** mbirru has quit IRC10:28
*** ralonsoh__ is now known as ralonsoh10:28
*** ralonsoh_ has quit IRC10:30
*** lpetrut has quit IRC10:31
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:31
*** mbirru has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:35
*** bfernando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:35
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:36
*** jchhatbar is now known as janki10:37
*** dtardivel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:46
*** rpodolyaka_afk is now known as rpodolyaka10:47
*** bsilverman_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:52
*** bsilverman_2 has quit IRC10:53
*** armax_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:54
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:54
*** armax has quit IRC10:56
*** armax_ is now known as armax10:56
*** amotoki has quit IRC10:56
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:58
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:59
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away11:08
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:11
*** janki has quit IRC11:14
*** mariannelm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:22
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:27
*** mbirru has quit IRC11:27
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:28
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:32
*** panda is now known as panda|lunch11:33
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC11:35
*** tuanluong has quit IRC11:36
*** apetrich has quit IRC11:44
*** panda|lunch is now known as panda11:48
*** __reps has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:49
*** shu-mutou has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:51
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC11:53
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch11:54
*** fzdarsky is now known as fzdarsky|lunch11:55
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:56
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:56
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:59
*** egallen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:05
*** egallen has quit IRC12:05
*** david-lyle has quit IRC12:05
*** egallen_ is now known as egallen12:05
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:05
*** rarcea has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:05
*** tonanhngo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:06
*** dasanind has quit IRC12:06
*** dougwig_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:07
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:08
*** dkehn__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:08
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC12:08
*** ankur-gupta-f1 has quit IRC12:08
*** dougwig has quit IRC12:08
*** dougwig_ is now known as dougwig12:08
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC12:08
*** mjura has quit IRC12:08
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:09
*** dkehn has quit IRC12:10
*** nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:13
*** dkehn__ has quit IRC12:15
*** nadya has quit IRC12:15
*** mjura has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:21
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:22
*** ankur-gupta-f1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:23
*** shu-mutou is now known as shu-mutou-AWAY12:28
*** skramaja has quit IRC12:28
*** skramaja_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:28
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:29
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:32
*** kaslcrof has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:40
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena12:43
*** msimonin has quit IRC12:43
*** pradk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:44
*** pradk has quit IRC12:45
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:50
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:54
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:55
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:55
*** markvoelker has quit IRC13:00
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:01
IgorYozhikov#startmeeting rpm_packaging13:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 15 13:02:15 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is IgorYozhikov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'rpm_packaging'13:02
IgorYozhikovping toabctl, dirk, apevec, aplanas, IgorYozhikov, jpena, jruzicka, number80, kaslcrof13:02
jpenao/13:02
IgorYozhikov#chair IgorYozhikov jpena toabctl13:02
openstackCurrent chairs: IgorYozhikov jpena toabctl13:02
toabctlhi13:03
dirko/13:03
* toabctl will be a bit distracted during the meeting...13:03
IgorYozhikov#chair IgorYozhikov jpena toabctl dirk13:03
openstackCurrent chairs: IgorYozhikov dirk jpena toabctl13:03
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:03
IgorYozhikovlet's spend some time on agenda13:03
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:05
*** skramaja_ has quit IRC13:06
*** skramaja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:06
IgorYozhikovlet's start13:07
IgorYozhikov#topic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/407102/ - semver version part - let's finalize decision13:07
*** openstack changes topic to "https://review.openstack.org/#/c/407102/ - semver version part - let's finalize decision (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:07
IgorYozhikovtoabctl, still has questions here13:07
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:07
jpenaYep, I have questions too. I've seen that the XStatic-* packages have 4 digit versions, e.g. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410747/8/openstack/XStatic-Magic-Search/XStatic-Magic-Search.spec.j213:09
IgorYozhikovI believe that here we need some additional input from RDO side13:09
IgorYozhikovjpena, afaik py2rpmversion is used only for OS projects13:10
IgorYozhikovsince that dependencies are not affected here13:10
jpenaok, in that case we should be fine13:10
IgorYozhikovalso dependencies doesn't use mid-milestone dev tails in versions, no?13:11
*** pgadiya has quit IRC13:11
jpenano, they don't13:11
toabctlrenderspec should work also for non-OS project. but if you are fine with the fedora solution, that is ok for me13:12
toabctlit just feels wrong. imo we should at least document that it is not doing the right thing13:12
IgorYozhikovok, so as I remember - these 2 functions were developed to handle OS components version/release13:12
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC13:12
toabctlIgorYozhikov, the can handle any pre/post release13:12
*** bfernando has quit IRC13:13
IgorYozhikovtoabctl, didn't get your question :(13:14
toabctlwhat question?13:14
IgorYozhikovabout pre/post releases13:14
toabctlhm. there is no question13:14
IgorYozhikovah, ok. and yes - I'm agree about documenting functions usage13:15
*** fzdarsky|lunch is now known as fzdarsky13:15
*** bfernando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:16
*** yuanying_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:17
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:17
IgorYozhikovif there are no objections and every1 agree with proposed changes - I will update documentation for py2rpmversion13:17
*** yangyapeng has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:17
IgorYozhikovotherwise - let's elaborate additional changes which should be made13:19
IgorYozhikovyour thoughts ?13:19
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:20
*** knangia has quit IRC13:20
jpena+1 for me13:21
*** msimonin has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:22
dirknext?13:23
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK13:23
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:24
IgorYozhikovdirk, yes13:24
IgorYozhikovhope that we will agree on something just a little bit later13:24
IgorYozhikov#topic systemd macro, new common with translation into rdo & suse or something else?13:24
*** openstack changes topic to "systemd macro, new common with translation into rdo & suse or something else? (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:24
jpenadirk, you mentioned the upstream systemd macros where available for SUSE, right?13:25
*** jprovazn has quit IRC13:25
IgorYozhikovI saw that commit was abandoned13:25
dirkjpena: so those with %service_* and with %systemd_* should be available now in the suse ci, yes13:26
dirkI'm confused which ones are the "upstream ones" and which we should be using going forward13:26
jpenaWhen I say upstream macros I'm referring to the ones in https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/src/core/macros.systemd.in13:27
jpenaI tried to dig a bit into the SUSE packaging, and I found they use different ones (the ones I was trying to emulate in my review)13:28
IgorYozhikovdirk, does it means that I can revert your changes - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/382196/34/openstack/mistral/mistral.spec.j2 ?13:29
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:30
IgorYozhikovto be more specific - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/382196/32..34/openstack/mistral/mistral.spec.j213:30
*** EricGonc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:31
IgorYozhikovand systemd_post will work as in centos an in suse linux?13:31
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:31
*** links has quit IRC13:31
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC13:32
jpenathat's what I expect13:32
*** jheroux has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:32
IgorYozhikovok, I'll try to do that today and will see :)13:34
*** yuanying_ has quit IRC13:34
*** __reps has quit IRC13:35
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:35
IgorYozhikovanything else related to this topic? just want to be more || less sure that this will not block us with the rest of services.13:35
IgorYozhikov#topic Xstatics* almost done - do we ready for horizon?13:37
*** openstack changes topic to "Xstatics* almost done - do we ready for horizon? (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:37
*** arxcruz has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:37
*** erlon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:38
IgorYozhikovThere is last of xstatics*, I believe, on review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410228/13:38
IgorYozhikovDoes it means that we can start work on horizon?13:38
IgorYozhikovor there are another parts to be done before?13:39
dirkjpena: IgorYozhikov : yep, so lets go with %systemd_ macros13:39
dirk#agreed for service packaging please use the %systemd_* macros from https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/src/core/macros.systemd.in13:40
IgorYozhikovdirk, yey13:40
IgorYozhikovthanx13:40
dirkIgorYozhikov: I am not sure regarding horizon, but its always worth putting up a review and see where it fails..13:41
dirkI was actually planning to help a bit with that but currently there are too many fires13:41
IgorYozhikovdirk, got it13:42
*** zhusz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:42
IgorYozhikovok, may be kaslcrof or tlbr could help with horizon, it' is not to urgent but will be very nice to have it in working state13:43
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:44
IgorYozhikovor if any1 else want to take it(horizon) - I'm fine with it13:44
tlbryes, we can take a look if required13:44
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:45
IgorYozhikovgreat, tlbr thanx a lot13:45
tlbrnp :)13:45
IgorYozhikovmoving forward?13:45
IgorYozhikov#topic Open floor13:45
*** openstack changes topic to "Open floor (Meeting topic: rpm_packaging)"13:45
IgorYozhikovdirk, I believe that you want to clarify rdo gate readiness/status?13:46
IgorYozhikovI saw commit from Tristan https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393606/13:48
jpenathis was a test to verify if some of the gerrit problems we had were fixed13:49
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:49
jpenaright now, the CI job is mostly behaving, although we still have the networkx.drawing package issue13:49
jpenawe could set the CI as non-voting for now, at least it's giving me some useful feedback13:49
dirkyeah13:50
dirkI would really like to see some reports in the reviews13:50
IgorYozhikovah, that's nice, so it's moving13:50
jpenaok, I'll go for it tomorrow then13:50
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC13:50
dirkjpena: is there a way we can have networkx.drawing issue worked around for now?13:50
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:51
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:51
jpenadirk: we have https://github.com/rdo-packages/taskflow-distgit/blob/rpm-master/python-taskflow.spec#L92-L93 in the RDO specs13:51
dirkjpena: so put that up as an review under a %if is_rdo condition?13:52
jpenadirk: works for me13:52
dirkI'd prefer imperfect but working ci over no ci any time13:52
jpenaagreed, I'll go for it13:52
dirkis it just building the package under review like the mos ci or does it rebuidl everything like the suse ci?13:53
jpenaonly the package under review13:53
dirkk, so the issue with networkx should be fairly isolated13:53
IgorYozhikovI also have 2 updates from my side13:54
IgorYozhikov1. about keystone + updated passlib13:54
IgorYozhikovI'll update keystone PR right after b2 will be released13:54
*** dstepanenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:54
IgorYozhikovbecause b1 is not compatible with passlib 1.7.013:55
IgorYozhikovalready spoke with keystone developers13:55
IgorYozhikovand 2nd - finally mos-ci add newton support13:55
IgorYozhikovand now it rebuilds whole bunch of projects resided under stable/newton branch @ rpm-packaging13:56
IgorYozhikovhttps://packaging-ci.fuel-infra.org/job/newton-rpm-packaging-build-centos7/13:56
IgorYozhikovthis means that mos-ci will reacts on commits into stable/newton as already reacts for mitaka & master13:57
IgorYozhikovall issues will be fixed in a couple of days13:57
IgorYozhikovthat's all from my side13:58
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
dirkthanks IgorYozhikov  for the update!13:58
dirklast q : another meeting next week same time same place?13:58
dirkor is everyone already off for end of the year vacation?13:59
IgorYozhikovwfm13:59
IgorYozhikovwe have vacation right after NY13:59
IgorYozhikovI know that in EU & US vacations before NY13:59
IgorYozhikovlet's discuss this at our channel. we r out of time14:01
IgorYozhikov#endmeeting14:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:01
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 15 14:01:16 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rpm_packaging/2016/rpm_packaging.2016-12-15-13.02.html14:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rpm_packaging/2016/rpm_packaging.2016-12-15-13.02.txt14:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rpm_packaging/2016/rpm_packaging.2016-12-15-13.02.log.html14:01
slashme#startmeeting freezer14:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 15 14:01:26 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is slashme. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: freezer)"14:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'freezer'14:01
dstepanenkohello everyone14:01
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
slashmeHello guys :-)14:01
zhuszhello14:01
slashmeAs usual meeting notes and agenda there: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/freezer_meetings14:02
yangyapenghello erveryone14:02
slashmeLet's wait a few minutes for people to join14:02
ralievhi all :)14:04
*** neilus has quit IRC14:06
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:07
szaherHello guys14:08
slashme#topic releases14:09
*** openstack changes topic to "releases (Meeting topic: freezer)"14:09
*** EricGonc_ has quit IRC14:09
slashmepython-freezerclient v1.1.0 was released yesterday14:09
*** lamt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:10
szaherCool14:10
*** lpetrut has quit IRC14:10
slashmeAll other freezer components v4.0.0b2 were released today14:10
*** rossella_s has quit IRC14:11
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:11
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:11
*** baoli has quit IRC14:12
slashmeThat's all I have in the agenda (except for the pending reviews).14:12
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
slashmeAnything you want to discuss ?14:12
ralievgood news! :)14:12
slashme# topic free14:12
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:12
*** derekh is now known as derekh_brb14:12
slashmeWe need to push a patch to the global requirement to bump the version on python-freezerclient up14:13
ralievslashme, you mean openstack-requirements?14:13
slashmeYes14:14
ralievI can do this14:14
*** stingaci has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:14
slashmeI'll do it, don't worry14:15
ralievokay :)14:15
dstepanenkoguys, I'm working on changes related to local and ssh backup/restore. The patch for local backup is already on review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/379281/. The patches for ssh backup are coming soon. Could you please hold these patches like your babies and add them to your top-review priority lists, because otherwise these very important changes will be on pending state for too long14:17
dstepanenkoBy the way, I really appreciate everyone who worked on it14:17
yangyapengsaher have some c commen14:18
slashmeAs soon as szaher's comments are adressed we will merge it14:18
szaherdstepanenko: I did some comments could you please review it ?14:18
dstepanenkoszaher: thanks! I'm already working on it14:19
*** stingaci has quit IRC14:19
dstepanenkoas far as I see you did it during last hour14:19
yangyapengszaher:  szaher ssh storage, should work it soon14:19
yangyapengdstepanenko:  thank you  :)14:20
*** gouthamr has quit IRC14:20
szaheryangyapeng: Yea I know but at the moment we need to display a message telling the user that this is not supported at the moment14:21
szahereven for other storage that might be added later14:22
yangyapengdstepanenko:  szaher we should have a TODO14:22
dstepanenkoI will add it14:22
zhuszdstepanenko: I'll check that patch also.14:23
dstepanenkozhusz: thanks!14:23
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:25
*** dizquierdo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:28
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:28
slashmeI updated https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/freezer_meetings with most of the pending reviews. Have a look when you have some time.14:29
dstepanenkothanks, slashme14:30
dstepanenkowill do14:30
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:31
*** ganso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
*** ashcrack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:33
*** EricGonc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:33
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:34
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC14:35
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:42
*** mickeys has quit IRC14:43
*** marst has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:43
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:44
*** edtubill has quit IRC14:44
*** kaslcrof has quit IRC14:44
*** derekh_brb is now known as derekh14:44
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
*** EricGonc_ has quit IRC14:47
*** dsariel has quit IRC14:48
*** nadya_ has quit IRC14:49
*** AndroUser has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
*** chhavi has quit IRC14:52
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
slashmeIt's time to end the meeting. Thanks for joining :-)14:55
slashme#endmeeting14:56
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:56
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 15 14:56:02 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:56
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/freezer/2016/freezer.2016-12-15-14.01.html14:56
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/freezer/2016/freezer.2016-12-15-14.01.txt14:56
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/freezer/2016/freezer.2016-12-15-14.01.log.html14:56
*** xyang1 has quit IRC14:56
*** dustins has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck14:58
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** vponomaryov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
* ganso hears crickets15:01
tommylikehu_meeting started?15:01
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
bswartz#startmeeting manila15:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 15 15:02:13 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bswartz. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: manila)"15:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:02
bswartzhello all15:02
gansohello15:02
marksturhi15:02
vponomaryovhello15:02
xyang1hi15:02
tommylikehu_hi15:02
tbarronhi15:02
toabctlhi15:02
gouthamrhello o/15:02
bswartzhmm looks like we don't have an agenda for today15:03
bswartz>_<15:03
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
vkmco/15:03
tommylikehu_open discuss15:03
bswartzI'll just use the remaining topics from last week15:03
bswartzfirst thing though15:04
bswartz#topic announcements15:04
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: manila)"15:04
bswartzO-2 is today15:04
bswartzhigh priority spec freeze is today15:04
*** arnewiebalck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
tommylikehu_today?15:04
*** arnewiebalck has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
bswartzyes15:04
*** arnewiebalck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
bswartzwe still have 3 unmerged specs15:05
bswartzunless we're ready to merge them now, we'll have to kick stuff out of the release15:05
*** pradk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
tommylikehu_I think we still have a day for them15:06
tommylikehu_I am working on it15:06
bswartzI should also point out that due to how short Ocata is, unlessimplementation is far along on these specs, they still probably don't stand a chance of landing in Ocata15:06
*** knangia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
bswartzso let's start with discussion of remaining specs15:07
bswartz#topic race conditions15:07
*** openstack changes topic to "race conditions (Meeting topic: manila)"15:07
tbarronready to merge after you fix typo in commit msg15:07
bswartz#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396255/15:07
vponomaryovbswartz: small update required, should be fast one15:07
vponomaryovbswartz: can fit deadline15:07
bswartzchanged15:08
bswartzcan we merge this one or is more work required?15:08
vponomaryovactually not ))15:08
vponomaryovhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/396255/13..14/specs/ocata/eliminate-race-conditions.rst15:08
*** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm15:08
gansobswartz: needs to address vponomaryov 's concern15:08
tbarronI have design questions about access-list fixes spec15:09
tbarronbut I think we should work on this in ocata15:09
bswartzvponomaryov's comment is about testing15:09
tbarronfundamental approach seems right15:09
tbarronbut design issues are more than just work it out in code review15:09
bswartzMy stance is that the only required testing is regression testing -- things should not get worse15:09
bswartzyes there are more tests we can add but those are out of scope15:10
*** numans has quit IRC15:10
gouthamri'm back today, so i will take a look at tbarron's concerns15:10
tbarrongouthamr: and I could just be confused :D15:10
bswartztbarron: I want to voer that topic next15:11
bswartzwb gouthamr15:11
tbarronbswartz: sorry, thought you'd moved to it15:11
bswartzI want to close on race conitions15:11
gouthamrthanks bswartz... tbarron: nope, i did have what you suggest in code, but my statements on the spec may be misleading..15:11
bswartzif more work is needed I can do it today but if not I'd like to just merge it15:11
* dustins skids into meeting 15:12
bswartzI think all the cores have read it15:12
* bswartz marks dustins tardy15:12
gansobswartz: I think there is an overall confusion about the spec's purpose, and I agree with vponomaryov15:12
gansobswartz: your spec title is "Eliminate race conditions"15:13
gansobswartz: but there are a few use cases listed, and we need rally and other tests to capture other race conditions and fix them15:13
tbarronganso: are you concerned about when the work would be Done?15:13
gansobswartz: so, it should be in fact titled "Mechanism for elimination of race conditions"15:13
bswartzganso: are you suggesting a change to the title? to the problem statment?15:13
gansobswartz: as they will still exist once what's in the scope of the spec is implemented15:13
*** zhusz has quit IRC15:13
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:14
gansobswartz: I initially assumed that testing, enumerating the race conditions etc were going to be in scope15:14
gansobswartz: but you stated that they are not15:14
tbarronfwiw, it's more of an "architecture" or "high level design" or "specification for eliminating" than a "mechanism"15:14
bswartzI see15:14
tbarronand I'm fine with that15:14
bswartzwell we want to do all of that but we have to face the reality of time15:14
gansoI am fine too, but I think it is good to address the confusion15:15
bswartzand ask what is achieveable in ocata15:15
tbarronmechanism should be switchable in a good architecture15:15
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC15:15
vponomaryovbswartz: then spec should say what we will do, so, I agree with ganso15:15
bswartztbarron: I'd argue that the mechanism is the architecture15:15
tbarronif we have to scope what will get done we won't start15:16
bswartzokay please put some more -1 on that spec and I'll push another draft after the meeting15:16
gansobswartz: ok15:16
tbarronbswartz: I won't dig in on that but I disagree :)15:16
bswartznobody go to sleep without reviewing PS1515:16
bswartz:-/15:16
bswartzalright moving on15:16
*** tonanhngo_ has quit IRC15:16
* bswartz curses gerrit15:17
bswartz#topic access rules15:17
*** openstack changes topic to "access rules (Meeting topic: manila)"15:17
gouthamr#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/399049/15:17
* tbarron already spoke out of turn15:17
bswartz#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/399049/15:18
bswartzLooks like I forgot to put my vote on here15:19
tbarronso i think denies can race with allows here and it's OK if we re-read the DB before calling into the driver, but15:19
tbarronthe state machine may need a little revision15:19
*** armax has quit IRC15:19
tbarronthat's a design issue, not just a coding issue15:19
bswartztbarron: have you discussed that with gouthamr15:20
tbarronbut the fundamental approach is good and we should proceed15:20
bswartzI thought that case was addessed15:20
tbarroni brought this stuff up while he was on vacation15:20
bswartzI can reread that part of the sepc15:20
bswartzgouthamr?15:20
tbarronit may just be a matter of wording and my understanding, but e.g. I think we need a 'new'->'denyiing' transition15:21
gouthamrtbarron: you do have that..15:21
bswartztbarron: +115:21
tbarronnothing we can't work out15:21
tbarrongouthamr: I didn't see it15:21
tbarronso this may just be my misreading15:21
gouthamrtbarron: let me take a look and update it.15:21
bswartzI see applying to denying15:22
tbarrongouthamr: why don't you add that there will be a state-machine diagram like what bswartz is providing in the devref, where it is kept up to date as implementation is done15:22
tbarroni asked bswartz for same in his spec15:22
gouthamrtbarron: yep, good idea15:22
tbarronreality is that these need to be up-to-date as manila evolves15:23
bswartztbarron: you mean the diagram will be moved to the devref and maintained there right?15:23
gouthamrtbarron: i meant to add that to the devref anyway after the implementation15:23
tbarronyes15:23
bswartzok15:23
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
bswartzany other issues with this spec?15:23
gouthamryeah, tooz15:23
gouthamr:P15:23
bswartzwhat about it15:23
gouthamrit's not gotten a lot of review attention15:23
bswartzhow does that afect the spec15:24
tbarrongouthamr: working top down with other stuff to do too :D15:24
*** jaugustine has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:24
bswartzwe'll get the implementation reviews done15:24
*** ashcrack has quit IRC15:24
gouthamrbswartz: sure, it's a dependency in both the specs we discussed so far..15:24
bswartzI'm asking about the spec now15:25
bswartzcan it be merged or does it need another patchset?15:25
vponomaryovno -1 - no concerns ))15:25
gouthamrneeds another patchset15:25
bswartzit's getting late for some core reviewers and we have a deadline today15:25
tbarroni can work my issues out w/ gouthamr today15:26
bswartzokay15:26
bswartzremember that vponomaryov, toabctl, and ganso are all someone further east of us15:26
bswartznot to mention gouthamr who is on the other side of the planet15:26
gouthamr:P15:27
gansolol15:27
gouthamri'm on the same side as you are now15:27
vponomaryovaand on vacation )15:27
bswartzoh you got back?15:27
bswartzokay hope you're not too jetlagged gouthamr15:27
gouthamryes, this morning :)15:27
vponomaryovvponomaryov will be able to review specs in about 4-5 hours15:27
bswartzokay15:27
bswartzlet's move on then15:27
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC15:27
bswartz#topic ipv615:27
*** openstack changes topic to "ipv6 (Meeting topic: manila)"15:27
tommylikehu_how do you think of this vponomaryov15:27
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC15:28
bswartz#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/362786/15:28
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
vponomaryovvponomaryov: could have been updated according to comments, for the moment it mixes two different goals under the one spec15:28
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
vponomaryovdetails can be seen in manila chat15:28
vponomaryovit should become simpler that it is now15:29
vponomaryovseparating part of logic to different spec15:29
vponomaryovthat will be in pike+15:29
vponomaryovif will be in general15:29
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC15:29
vponomaryovs/that/than/15:29
tbarronvponomaryov: i think those two goals - assuming they are two - came from bswartz asking how to support use of  v6 and v4 at the same time15:29
tbarronso if tommylikehu_ does what you suggest, the question is whether bswartz will -1 it15:30
bswartzyeah I though this was covered last night but I don't see the spec updated acordingly15:30
*** georgelorch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
tbarronbswartz: another conversation this morning provides different guidance15:30
vponomaryovlet's have about 6 hours before we close the doors15:30
bswartzthe key here is that our mechanism for supporting v6 in network plugins is to make network plugins aware of both v4 and v615:30
bswartzsorry I haven't read the scrollback in manila channel15:31
* bswartz reads15:31
bswartzis it just a matter of the word support vs enabled?15:31
tommylikehu_no15:31
vponomaryovbswartz: it is matter of supporting multiple networks/subnets "at once"15:32
bswartzvponomaryov: can't a subnet have v4+v6 together?15:32
vponomaryovbswartz: no15:32
bswartzor do I misunderstand neutron15:32
cknightbswartz: IMO, it's not OK to to do v4 or v6, but not both.15:32
tommylikehu_bswartz:  you asked the question I did15:32
vponomaryovbswartz: neutron subnet has only one Ip version15:32
* bswartz curses15:33
tbarronuse case of exporting both ipv4 & ipv6 and having compute instances choose either to do mount is not suported.15:33
vponomaryovon eneutron network canhave two subnets, each for each Ip versions15:33
bswartzI see15:33
bswartzvponomaryov can a "port" have 2 subnets?15:33
tbarronto support it we'd have to have multiple subnets/gateways per share network15:33
marksturthe spec shouldn't need to include making the network plug-ins support both 4 and 6. Similar to the drivers it should just be a good enough spec that we can add support once this framework is in place.15:33
vponomaryovbswartz: yes, it can be related to several subnets15:34
vponomaryovbswartz: we use that feature of port in generic driver15:34
bswartzokay15:34
vponomaryovmarkstur: but it covers case to support IPv6 in network plugins15:34
bswartzI think I understand what the neutron guys were thinking then15:34
tbarroni can use same port from compute instance to mount via ipv4 or mount via ipv6, manually setting up exports15:35
bswartzokay so we have to make a decision15:35
bswartzit seems like we're not ready to deal with the issues around network plugins and v4+v615:35
marksturit covers ipv6 for drivers, but that doesn't mean all the work will be done to enhance the drivers15:35
tbarronvponomaryov: it's the "subnets" that are IPv4 or IPv6 specific, not the neutron "networks"15:35
bswartzso do we leave that unspecified, or do we specify some limiteed behavior that we know we can implement?15:36
gansobswartz: I think we can go with "limited" for now15:36
bswartzganso: what should that lmited behavior be?15:36
cknightbswartz: we need to understand the endgame, even if there is an intermediate step15:36
vponomaryovbswartz: still support only one network-subnet per network plugin15:37
gansobswartz: if we know we can achieve v4+v6 network plugin in the future, we can proceed supporting only one for now15:37
bswartzcknight: I think we've missed that boat -- as we don't understand, and we're out of time15:37
vponomaryovbswartz: but allow it to be either IPv6 or IPv415:37
gansobswartz: in other words, not both at the same time15:37
cknightbswartz: then the spec should wait15:37
bswartzI don't think it's a good idea to punt the whole spec -- ipv6 is valuable and important15:38
vponomaryovbswartz: that is why I am saying to exclude part of it15:38
marksturwhat about just doing dhss=false ipv6 -- does that make sense?15:38
bswartzokay let's keep working on it then and try to understand the correct solution now15:38
gouthamrmarkstur: +115:38
tbarroncknight: if the end game means supporting ipv4 and ipv6 export locations from the same share to compute instances who can choose either at will then we have to redo our plugin arch before allowing any ipv6 access by that standard15:38
gansodhss=False will not touch plugin, that will further reduce the scope15:38
gansos/plugin/plugins15:39
bswartzyeah I think we know that eventually there must be a way to create share servers with v4+v615:39
cknightbswartz, tbarron: yes, ipv6 is valuable, but I'm hesitant to plunge forward in the dark if we don't know where we're going.15:39
gouthamrganso: +1 i think this is a saner approach15:39
markstureven if we have only ipv4 network plugins for dhss=true (I was hoping we'd at lease know how we want to do that though)15:39
bswartzit's not clear if that should be done w/ multiple plugins or with smarter plugins that understand both15:39
bswartzcknight: I'm willing to use the rest of the meeting to reach the answer15:39
tbarronrestrict to DHSS=False for now?15:39
bswartztbarron: you mean make share servers limited to ipv4/15:40
gouthamryes, don't claim support for ipv6 with share servers now15:40
tbarronyes, it's an option15:40
*** jmckind has quit IRC15:40
bswartzgouthamr technically share servers already do support ipv615:40
vponomaryovright15:40
bswartzat least the standlone network plugin has v6 support15:41
vponomaryovbut not tested15:41
gouthamrbswartz: technically, yes, but not our neutron network plugins15:41
tbarronbut not v4 at the same time15:41
gouthamrso, we can work on that15:41
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:41
bswartzlets decide how we will eventually support both15:41
bswartzthe options seem to be:15:41
tbarronand cannot have v6 at the same time without plugin re-architecture15:41
bswartz1) separate network plugins, one for v4 and one for v615:41
bswartz2) modify network plugins to handle 2 subnets where necessary for v4+v615:42
marksturThe drivers need to know if the configured plug-in will support 4 or 6 or both15:42
vponomaryov(2) requires rearchitecture of getting network info, that is out of scope for adding general IPv6 support15:42
bswartzmarkstur: that's a driver interface issue which is technically independent of the network plugin interface15:43
bswartzvponomaryov: we can decide it's what we want to do, but postpone that work until pike15:43
gansovponomaryov: but that is related to DHSS=True in general, for all drivers, that could be done in pike, if we consider it to be necessary to achieve what we want15:43
tbarronIs there a downside to #2 other than that it may be a lot of work?15:43
bswartzwhat we don't want is to leave it undecided15:43
tommylikehu_markstur: it's already descibed in spec15:43
bswartztbarron: good point15:44
marksturWe don't have a final spec for #215:44
bswartzI was leaning towards a different flavor of (2) where neutron simply did v4+v6 in one subnet15:44
bswartzbut since that's not possible it seems like we could still do it, albeit with more effort15:45
vponomaryovtbarron: it is a LOT of work15:45
* tbarron thanks vponomaryov for signing up15:45
gansolol15:45
marksturcan we just push that part to pike and do the easy stuff in ocata?15:45
cknightbswartz: Let's consider the user experience.  A user should know from a share type that a share will be available on v4, v6, or both.  And a share of that type should report corresponding export locations.  We should reject any option that doesn't eventually get us there.15:45
tbarronvponomaryov: so we should maybe not decide immediately ...15:45
bswartzcknight: both options on the table allow us to do that15:45
tbarronvponomaryov: I am interested in this issue though and don't want to just dismiss #2 without investigation15:46
bswartzI think the user-facing part of the design is clear15:46
*** yuanying_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
bswartzwhat's unclear is what the admin will need to put in the conf file to get DHSS=true+v4+v615:46
cknightbswartz: Having separate network plugins can do that?15:46
vponomaryovcknight: yes15:46
tbarroncknight: so does that imply share network will have both ipv4 and ipv6 subnets if both familiies are in use?15:46
bswartzcknight: that's option (1)15:46
gansogouthamr: does #2 tie in any way with your spec for supporting multiple subnets in share networks?15:47
vponomaryovbswartz: both options about supporting multiple subnets15:47
vponomaryovbswartz: there should be other options15:47
bswartzvponomaryov: what do you propose?15:47
vponomaryovbswartz: support any IP version for single network15:47
tbarronoption #1 may be more expedient but having to configure 4 plugins (2*user, 2*admin) could be a pain and potentially confusing15:47
bswartzno matter what we'll end up with 2 or more subnets thanks to neutron's design15:48
vponomaryovbswartz: so, we "fix" existing network plugns to be able to work with "single" network-subnet of any Ip versions if we have issues with it15:48
bswartzvponomaryov and when we want both together how to we modify the archirecture?15:49
vponomaryovand allow access rules be of any IP version that is related to used network15:49
*** StanLagun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:49
vponomaryovbswartz: share-network interface, config-interface, share-manager logic15:49
bswartzvponomaryov: that doesn't satisfy the contract of the API15:49
vponomaryovbswartz: all of above for supporting multiple network-subnets15:49
bswartzusers will expect dual v4+v6 access to shares15:50
vponomaryovit is separate goal15:50
vponomaryovnot general support of IPv615:50
bswartzyes but we're making a decision on that now to unblock the spec15:50
vponomaryovwhich can be the only type of networks15:50
*** yuanying_ has quit IRC15:50
bswartzwe can explcitly not implement it15:50
bswartzbut we will specify what we plan to do15:51
bswartzlet's talk about downsides15:51
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:51
bswartz(1) has the downside that it's ugly from a config perspective15:51
tbarron+115:52
bswartzwe already have 2 plugins -- one for users and one for admin export loations15:52
*** saisrikiran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
bswartz(1) would mean having 3 or 4 plugins per backend15:52
bswartzon the plus side (1) gives you a ridiculous amount of flexibility15:52
tommylikehu_:)15:52
tbarronand confusion about plugins is already a disincentive for deployers to do DHSS=True15:52
bswartzyou could use standalone plugin for v4 and neturon plugin for v6 (possibly)15:53
gouthamrganso: i need a rehash at all the discussions that have been happening around this - i might need to update the mutiple subnets spec with the feedback here - currently, the spec proposes multiple subnets with a tie-in to AZs15:53
bswartzthe downsides to (2) seem to be that it's more work and less flexible15:53
*** lpetrut has quit IRC15:53
bswartzhowever (2) might lead to better experience for admin15:53
tbarronand support15:53
vponomaryovbswartz: or we can have both approaches ))15:54
tommylikehu_how ?15:54
vponomaryovbswartz: so deployer choose one of them to use )15:54
bswartztaking away choices leads to happier customers -- apple teaches us this15:54
tbarron vponomaryov wants to drive me out of the support maniila in openstack business :D15:54
vponomaryovbswartz: you call deployer a user?15:54
tbarronthey are the kind of user who buys openstack support15:55
bswartzvponomaryov: we care about experiences of both end users and deployers/admin users15:55
bswartzalthough when the 2 are in conflict we prioritize the end user15:55
vponomaryovbswartz: it is an option anyway15:55
vponomaryovI do not say I am for it15:55
*** ashcrack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
bswartzI'm in favor of (2) still15:56
tbarronbut we don't know how much work that is, right?15:56
tbarronwe have reason from vponomaryov to believe it's not at all trivial15:57
vponomaryovbswartz: it is end-goal, current spec is intermediate goal15:57
bswartzkeep a single plugin, and make plugins handle both -- however declare that in the short term it doesn't work15:57
bswartznothing will be trivial15:57
tommylikehu_how much time do we left for this code job?15:57
bswartz5 weeks minus holidays15:57
*** gkibardin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
tommylikehu_We do not have holidays in china15:58
vponomaryovwow ))15:58
bswartzerr 6 weeks minus holidays15:58
vponomaryovsounds great15:58
tommylikehu_:(..15:58
xyang1tommylikehu_: what about chinese new year?:)15:58
tbarronvponomaryov: you review up to ukranian xmas and we'll pick it up afterwards :D15:58
tommylikehu_let me check15:58
bswartzit 's 6 weeks to feature freeze, but proposal freeze is in 4 weeks15:58
bswartzokay we're out of time15:59
bswartztommylikehu: I think we're going to stick with what we talked about last night15:59
tommylikehu_#215:59
bswartzplease update the spec to say that plugins should be able to support either or both v4 and v615:59
tommylikehu_ok15:59
vponomaryovbswartz: does it mean to support any amount of subnets?16:00
bswartzbut it's acceptable for plugins to simply fail to support both16:00
bswartzvponomaryov: just 2 I think16:00
bswartzwe'll leaev the improvements to neutron plugins out of scope16:00
marksturbut having 2 subnets is not in O?16:00
bswartzmarkstur: correct16:00
bswartzokay I'm going to end the meeting16:00
*** sridharg has quit IRC16:01
bswartzeveryone review the high priority specs until they merge16:01
marksturthankyou16:01
bswartzanything not merged today is out16:01
bswartz#endmeeting16:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:01
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 15 16:01:26 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2016/manila.2016-12-15-15.02.html16:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2016/manila.2016-12-15-15.02.txt16:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2016/manila.2016-12-15-15.02.log.html16:01
*** xyang1 has quit IRC16:01
ashtokolov#startmeeting Fuel16:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 15 16:02:41 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ashtokolov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'fuel'16:02
ashtokolovHi folks!16:02
ashtokolov The agenda is empty for today16:03
ashtokolov#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda16:03
*** mjura has quit IRC16:03
ashtokolovI have a few updates about current state16:03
*** links has quit IRC16:04
ashtokolovWe are working on bug fixing and small enhancements for ocata, stable/newton and stable/mitaka branches16:04
ashtokolovNext minor Fuel Mitaka release aka Fuel 9.2 is scheduled for January 3116:05
ashtokolovFuel Ocata release is scheduled for the end of February16:06
*** AndroUser has quit IRC16:07
ashtokolovI will update the releases schedule with all milestones for 9.x, 10.x and 11 releases tomorrow16:07
*** AndroUser has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:07
ashtokolov#topic Open discussions16:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussions (Meeting topic: Fuel)"16:07
ashtokolovPlease feel free to ask your questions, if any16:08
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC16:08
*** dkehn__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:09
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC16:10
ashtokolovOk, looks like that's all16:11
ashtokolovThanks16:11
ashtokolov#endmeeting16:11
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:11
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:11
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 15 16:11:34 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:11
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2016/fuel.2016-12-15-16.02.html16:11
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2016/fuel.2016-12-15-16.02.txt16:11
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fuel/2016/fuel.2016-12-15-16.02.log.html16:11
*** jmckind_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
*** AndroUser has quit IRC16:12
*** AndroUser has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:13
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC16:13
*** jmckind has quit IRC16:13
*** tremble has quit IRC16:14
*** korzen has quit IRC16:14
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:21
*** rmart04 has quit IRC16:27
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:28
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
*** rcernin has quit IRC16:34
*** baoli has quit IRC16:36
*** Leom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:38
*** ccamacho is now known as ccamacho|out16:41
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:42
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:49
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:49
*** andreas_s has quit IRC16:49
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** vds has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** nadya has quit IRC16:51
*** fzdarsky is now known as fzdarsky|afk16:53
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:53
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:54
*** qwebirc80901 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
*** qwebirc80901 has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
*** neilus has quit IRC16:57
*** capnoday has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** Guest59 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
*** Guest59 is now known as hyakuhei17:01
hyakuhei#startmeeting security17:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 15 17:01:38 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hyakuhei. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:01
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: security)"17:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'security'17:01
lhindso/17:01
singlethinko/17:01
hyakuheiHi all, sorry for the delay, my bouncer died and that took me a second to figure out :)17:01
tkelseyol17:02
mdongo/17:02
capnodayo/17:02
tkelsey*o/17:02
vdso/17:02
knangiao/17:02
unrahulo/17:02
hyakuheiI don't think a huge amount has happened but the standing agenda, as always, is here: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/security-agenda17:02
*** beslemon has quit IRC17:03
hyakuheiok, lets crack on then :)17:03
hyakuhei#topic Syntribos17:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Syntribos (Meeting topic: security)"17:03
hyakuheiHow's it going guys?17:03
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
unrahulhey guys17:04
lhindsgood thanks hyakuhei17:04
unrahulso we are still continuing testing of swift this week as well, mostly tyring to DoS swift by writing large amount of data17:04
unrahuldeleting , writing at the same time .. and things of that sort..17:04
mdongthey sent us a list of fun things to try17:04
unrahulwe are also working on redesigning the parser , I think mdong just pushed a patch for it17:05
unrahulyup.. indeed they did..17:05
*** browne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
unrahulthe swift team here at OSIC has helped us identifying possible places where we should look at17:05
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
notmynameunrahul: what are you expecting to find with large amounts of read/write to swift? (or where's the better channel to ask this if not here in the meeting)17:05
*** beslemon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:06
unrahulpdardeau , ntata etc of the swift team17:06
*** beslemon has quit IRC17:06
unrahulwell we are trying to see if the proxy would be able to handle it.. and will there be delays or when we try to write files with null characters if things work okay etc17:06
singlethinkAre you checking the consistency of the resulting objects?  Or is that out of scope?17:07
unrahulnotmyname:  basically a set of smoke tests to identify if everything would work as normal..17:07
unrahulsinglethink:  consistency in what way..?17:07
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
singlethinkif I write, then delete, then read the object shouldn't be there17:07
unrahullike if the file md5s remains the same?17:07
singlethinkthat sort of stuff17:07
unrahulyup..17:07
singlethinkthat too17:07
unrahulwe are trying things like that, create delete, then try to read.. and if we create a lot of containers and delete them and at the same time write to it.. if things go haywire..17:08
singlethinkcool17:08
notmynamehttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2016-December/018132.html would be a good overview of what to expect and not expect17:09
*** ajafo has quit IRC17:09
unrahulthanks notmyname  we shall go through it..17:09
unrahulif there is anything else you guys are curious about regarding swift,.. we could try and test it.. as well.17:10
notmynamealso, you might what to look at swift's probe tests which are set up to test this exact sort of thing, albeit in a very controlled way. it's very difficult to test edge cases in swift when you're treating it like a black box17:10
hyakuheiThat's a nicely written email17:10
*** ajafo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:10
notmynamethanks17:10
hyakuheiThough a tldr might have helped :P17:10
unrahulother than that.. we are also trying to test the ACL controls of swift as well.. lets see if something comes up..17:10
unrahulnotmyname:  thats a detailed email.. thank you for the link :)17:11
notmynameunrahul: lol, I thought I glossed over all of the real details ;-)17:11
unrahulthats it from us.. mdong  anything else?17:11
hyakuheiYou guys have discussed what your releases are going to look line in terms of lining up with community expectations right? I'm sure we covered that in one of those meetings where I was trying to do too many things at once17:12
*** iyamahat has quit IRC17:12
hyakuheiI'll take that as a yes I guess :)17:13
unrahulehh.. hyakuhei  yes.. So this time, we are trying to push the major patch of simplifying templates and writing some smoke tests, fixing bugs.. if there is time, request chaning17:13
unrahulas well..17:14
unrahulis that what you had in mind?17:14
*** crdotson has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:14
mdongI think the answer is a no. Which meeting was this discussed in? I must’ve missed it personally17:14
unrahulwe had said what we would be doing this cycle.. a few meetings back..17:15
unrahulbut I am not sure if there is anything else, like a mailing list summary that we have to give..hyakuhei ?17:15
hyakuheiWe don't need to do that, just making sure we follow the release schedule, milestones etc.17:15
unrahulWe are releasing out of cycle for now, should we try to release the new version along with the cycle.. from next time.., I think out of cycle release would help us a little bit..17:17
hyakuheiSeems reasonable17:18
*** nmagnezi has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:18
unrahulAs we are using a lot of openstack clients in our extensions.. we could help from waiting for them to be released and if there are no bugs, release syntribos then..17:18
hyakuheiSo long as that's communicated in the appropriate way17:18
*** kevo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:18
unrahulwe could add this in our release note, when we release next time, that we are following this out of cycle release, because of these .. things..17:19
hyakuheiThat sounds reasonable, I'm sure there's an #openstack-thing that we can do to say we're not in the normal release cycle17:19
hyakuhei@fungi might know17:19
unrahulyup..we shall talk to @fungi , thanks hyakuhei17:20
fungicatching up17:20
*** jpena is now known as jpena|away17:21
hyakuheihey @fungi we're making a bigger effort to look and smell like any other OpenStack project17:21
hyakuheithe Syntribos team doesn't currently follow the release cycle17:21
fungioh, right that used to be handled with governance tags on each deliverable, but is tracked with metadata in teh releases repo since a month or two ago17:21
* fungi find link for you17:21
hyakuheiI knew something had changed recently... thanks @fungi17:21
hyakuheineither does the bandit or anchor teams of course.17:22
fungilooks like it gets reflected in http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/releases/tree/deliverables/ocata17:22
hyakuheiExcellent, thank you @fungi17:22
hyakuheiok I think we are ready to move on, thanks for coming by fungi17:23
hyakuhei#topic OSSN17:23
*** openstack changes topic to "OSSN (Meeting topic: security)"17:23
fungiright now you have http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/releases/tree/deliverables/_independent/syntribos.yaml17:23
fungiyou're welcome, always happy to help17:23
*** hurricanerix has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:24
hyakuheilhinds lets talk OSSN17:24
unrahulthanks fungi17:24
lhindsk.17:25
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
lhindsone is out on embargo, public next week (one of yours hyakuhei)17:25
hyakuheifinally :)17:25
lhindsthat leaves two outstanding..one is for you hyakuhei (the other nova one) which is almost ready to go.17:25
*** dustins has quit IRC17:25
lhindstake a look if you can at my last comment, we might be able to get that one out to then.17:26
lhindsthe other remaining ossn is against travis, who I guess is on PTO atm.17:26
hyakuheiYeah, is it something I could help with lhinds ?17:26
lhindssure, please take a look at the last one against you set to 'new'17:27
lhindstristian just made a commment17:27
lhindsbut most of the draft is there, so should just need a minor poke to get it out.17:28
lhindsI will chase up the other note with tmcpeak when he returns.17:28
hyakuheiok I'll take a look shortly17:28
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
lhindsthx!17:29
lhindsthat;s it for now, can move to the next item.17:29
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC17:29
hyakuheiok, next item is.... blog17:29
hyakuhei#topic Blog17:29
*** openstack changes topic to "Blog (Meeting topic: security)"17:29
hyakuheiJust some encouragement here for people to contribute17:30
hyakuheiIncluding me17:30
hyakuheiWho's been very bad at not delivering on the LF badge posting17:30
lhindsI will try to do some more, I need to fix up my post, I reverted it as the date was wrong.17:30
hyakuheiAh righto17:31
hyakuheido we have capnoday with us?17:31
*** rarcea has quit IRC17:31
capnodaysup17:31
*** bfernando has quit IRC17:31
*** beslemon_ has quit IRC17:31
hyakuhei#topic Review17:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Review (Meeting topic: security)"17:31
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
hyakuheicapnoday I know there's not much to report but say something insightful to inspire the crew over the xmas period17:32
capnodaysorry, day job just happened17:32
hyakuheithat's depressing not inspiring17:32
hyakuheididn't you push a big update to the template this week?17:33
capnodayok, I've just pushed up a new template for architecture pages17:33
*** derekh has quit IRC17:33
capnodayits designed to match the new process we developed in Austin17:33
*** armax has quit IRC17:33
ashcracki'm totally new here. i want to support you in sec review or audit or anything else. can you give me some tipps how can i do?17:33
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
capnodaythats great ashcrack!17:34
capnodaywe are still developing the process, so having someone else to help out with that would be really good17:34
ashcracknice. should we talk about how i can help after finishing the agenda?17:34
capnodayover the break im going to get the process up to date, so we should be good to run through it in january17:35
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:35
lhindshi ashcrack , would you be Björn by any chance?17:35
capnodayashcrack sounds good17:35
ashcrackyou are right lhinds17:36
lhindsok, cool. Nice to have you here to get involved!17:36
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:36
hyakuhei+1 welcome ashcrack17:36
*** neilus has quit IRC17:36
ashcracklhinds17:36
ashcrackyour are jeremy?!17:37
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
lhindsashcrack: Luke Hinds17:37
fungiashcrack: yes17:37
fungiashcrack: i'm jeremy17:37
fungiwell, i'm _a_ jeremy anyway17:37
ashcrackah sorry^^17:37
lhindswell yes, he is jeremy ^ :P17:37
lhindsI replied to your email on the list. good to have you17:37
*** nadya has quit IRC17:37
fungiashcrack: i just replied to the e-mail you sent me as well17:37
fungiwelcome!17:38
ashcracki get it few minutes ago17:38
hyakuheiExcellent17:38
lhindsashcrack: I am just thinking, your at university?17:38
*** jpena|away is now known as jpena|off17:38
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:38
lhinds*you're17:38
hyakuheiDo we have any sec-guide folks around?17:39
ashcrackyes. i'm writing my thesis17:39
capnodaysicarie?17:39
lhindsk, maybe intern stuff might be of use to you, we can look into later17:39
lhindssorry hyakuhei , as you are..17:39
hyakuheilol17:39
ashcrackok17:39
hyakuheiWe don't have a sicarie this week.17:39
hyakuheiI don't know of any big changes in docs.17:40
lhindsnothing in review atm17:40
hyakuheiWell that takes us to AOB17:40
hyakuhei#topic Any Other Business17:40
*** openstack changes topic to "Any Other Business (Meeting topic: security)"17:40
lhindsfestive meeting schedules?17:40
*** neilus has quit IRC17:40
hyakuheiAh yes17:40
hyakuheiI vote we meet again after NYD17:40
lhindssounds gtm17:41
hyakuheiThat'd be the 5th of Jan17:41
lhindsso the 5th of Jan?17:41
capnoday+117:41
lhinds+117:41
hyakuheiok excellent17:41
hyakuheiThat passes17:41
hyakuheiGlad you mentioned it, I'd forgotten.17:41
lhindsnp17:41
capnodayhyakuhei update from sicarie - he cant tell the time. also no-op on the guide17:42
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:42
hyakuheirojer!17:42
*** mtanino has quit IRC17:42
hyakuheiheh17:42
singlethinkCisco is shutting down it's biggest OpenStack cloud deployment(s): http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/12/13/cisco_to_kill_its_intercloud_public_cloud_on_march_31st_2017/17:42
hyakuheiOk, anything else people?17:42
singlethink:-/17:42
hyakuhei:-/17:42
capnodayand yet the foundation is worried about what animal each team will be represented by...17:43
hyakuheinow now, we love our duly elected overlords.17:43
capnodaygo pangolins!17:43
*** panda is now known as panda|bbl17:44
capnodayspeaking of which, is there anything we need to cover for the PTG or PTL elections17:44
fungiwell, the foundation's marketing team is striving to have better ways to display non-wall-of-text representations of openstack as a whole, and having mascots/logos helps they do that so i'm not going to dissuade them. ultimately we do rely a lot on their marketing prowess17:44
hyakuheiI'll cover it on the 5th, elections start in the 3rd week of Jan I think17:44
fungis/they/them/17:45
capnodaythanks fungi, I (partly) joke17:45
capnodayhyakuhei awesome17:45
fungicapnoday: i can totally see how it would seem trivial/silly, so completely understand17:45
*** rossella_s has quit IRC17:45
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:46
hyakuheiok, I think that's it, have a good day all, talk to you after the holidays!17:46
hyakuhei#endmeeting17:47
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:47
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 15 17:47:00 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:47
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2016/security.2016-12-15-17.01.html17:47
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2016/security.2016-12-15-17.01.txt17:47
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/security/2016/security.2016-12-15-17.01.log.html17:47
*** tkelsey has quit IRC17:47
*** browne has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:47
*** nadya has quit IRC17:47
lhindsthanks all have a nice break17:47
singlethinkhappy holidays!17:47
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:48
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:49
unrahulhappy holidays!17:49
capnodaythanks everybody17:50
capnodayashcrack lets talk in openstack-security17:50
ashcrackk17:50
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC17:52
*** nadya has quit IRC17:53
*** capnoday has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** beslemon has quit IRC17:55
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:57
*** florianf has quit IRC17:58
*** neilus has quit IRC18:07
*** acabot has quit IRC18:11
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
*** neilus has quit IRC18:18
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:19
*** neilus has quit IRC18:21
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:21
*** rhagarty has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:23
*** neilus_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:23
*** neilus has quit IRC18:23
*** Leom has quit IRC18:25
*** ashcrack has quit IRC18:27
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:29
*** ianychoi has quit IRC18:30
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:31
*** beslemon has quit IRC18:33
*** neiljerram has quit IRC18:33
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:34
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:39
*** yuanying_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
*** stingaci has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:48
*** yuanying_ has quit IRC18:51
*** ganso has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:52
*** harlowja has quit IRC18:52
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
*** dprince has quit IRC18:57
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:00
*** AndroUser has quit IRC19:00
*** cknight has quit IRC19:02
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:04
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
*** Leo_ has quit IRC19:10
*** dprince has quit IRC19:18
*** dizquierdo_ has quit IRC19:19
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:20
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:21
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC19:23
*** neilus_ has quit IRC19:28
*** kfarr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:28
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:30
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:31
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:32
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:36
*** dprince has quit IRC19:38
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:39
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC19:41
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC19:43
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
*** saisrikiran has quit IRC19:51
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:53
*** dtardivel has quit IRC19:54
ttxSpamapS: meeting ?20:01
SpamapSttx: oh right20:02
*** beslemon has quit IRC20:02
SpamapS#startmeeting arch_wg20:03
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 15 20:03:00 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is SpamapS. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: arch_wg)"20:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'arch_wg'20:03
*** neilus has quit IRC20:03
SpamapS#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Arch-WG#Agenda20:03
SpamapSCourtesy ping for nikhil, harlowja, dstanek, kragniz, auggy, rockyg, rocky_g, kgiusti20:04
SpamapS#topic previous meeting action items20:04
*** openstack changes topic to "previous meeting action items (Meeting topic: arch_wg)"20:04
cdentmy calendar is confused again20:04
* cdent fixes20:04
SpamapS#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/arch_wg/2016/20:04
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC20:04
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC20:04
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
SpamapS* SpamapS email proposed arch-wg repo process to openstack-dev20:05
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC20:05
SpamapSUnfortunately I have had 0 time for arch-wg the last 2 weeks. :-/20:05
SpamapSso, carrying20:05
SpamapS#action SpamapS email proposed arch-wg repo process to openstack-dev20:05
SpamapS#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/399201/120:05
SpamapS* ttx to actually submit base services etherpad contents to arch-wg repo20:06
ttxdone20:06
ttxnot much comments20:06
ttxthanks cdent :)20:06
SpamapS#link https://review.openstack.org/40604920:06
cdentyou're very welcome20:06
SpamapSSorry again, haven't been able to do arch-wg stuff.20:06
ttxtemporary or permanent ?20:06
SpamapStemporary20:07
ttxgreat!20:07
SpamapSJust lots of chaos.20:07
SpamapS* SpamapS write up nova-compute rant as a proposal to arch-wg repo20:07
SpamapSobviously didn't do that. :-p20:07
SpamapS#action SpamapS write up nova-compute rant as a proposal to arch-wg repo20:07
* cdent is very curious about that (having missed a few meetings)20:07
SpamapSI did actually start writing it but not enough to submit. :-P20:08
*** panda|bbl is now known as panda20:08
SpamapS* Rockyg to write up implementation bleed-through thoughts and submit to arch-wg repo20:08
SpamapSI don't see a rocky so we'll carry20:08
SpamapS#action Rockyg to write up implementation bleed-through thoughts and submit to arch-wg repo20:08
SpamapS#topic Proposal Process Review20:09
*** crdotson has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Proposal Process Review (Meeting topic: arch_wg)"20:09
SpamapSThe process is still slow. Mostly due to lack of engagement. I hope again to get back to it.20:09
ttxI will work on more once the first one is processed :P20:10
SpamapSRight20:10
SpamapSat a glance, it looks fine. :)20:10
SpamapSbut I do want to read it carefully20:10
SpamapSdo we have enough people with +2?20:10
SpamapSI think dtroyer was a person with +2.. don't see him here either20:10
*** beslemon has quit IRC20:11
SpamapS#link https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1615,members20:12
SpamapSI think we'll go with one +2 for now20:13
*** kjw3 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:13
SpamapS#topic Proposals for work20:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Proposals for work (Meeting topic: arch_wg)"20:13
SpamapS* Base Services - ttx20:13
SpamapScdent: I see your +1. Does anyone else want to ask ttx questions?20:13
ttxfrankly it's more a definition than anything else20:14
cdentthat +1 is basically "you addressed the issues I saw and this seems like a good start, so why not ship it"20:14
SpamapScool20:14
SpamapSyeah that's fine20:14
ttxand also lays out the challenges in modifying that in the future20:14
SpamapSDon't despair. We'll start landing stuff soon. Holiday times are tough.20:14
ttxend-of-year is tough too. random tasks falling like snow20:15
SpamapSyep20:15
ttxyearly reports :)20:15
ttxdon't expect january to be any better though20:15
SpamapSYeah20:15
SpamapSI hope we have 3 or 4 proposals in the pipe and maybe one in process by then though20:16
SpamapSbut yeah.. timing20:16
SpamapS#topic Open Discussion20:16
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: arch_wg)"20:16
SpamapSOne thing ... I think we may have to rethink the APAC slot20:16
SpamapSI can't seem to make it.20:16
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:17
SpamapSI always plan to, but things seem to constantly come up at that hour20:17
SpamapSanyway, I may just send a message asking for who wants it, and if we get low interest.. cancel the APAC slot20:17
SpamapSbut I'll try one more time next week20:18
SpamapSanything else?20:18
cdentI just briefly skimmed the logs about api-wg not addressing implementation bleedthrough. I can confimr the api-wg has not been doing that, but not because it isn't something we/they care about. "Good HTTP" has had the priority bit for more than a year now.20:18
ttxshould we plan to skip next 2 meetings ?20:18
SpamapScdent: :)20:18
cdent+1 on skip next wo20:18
cdenttwo!20:18
ttxI won't be around on te 29th for sure :)20:19
SpamapS#action SpamapS send message to openstack-dev cancelling further 2016 meetings.20:19
SpamapSagreed20:20
SpamapScdent: Yeah I figure it's something we could work on jointly.20:20
cdent20:20
SpamapSBecause right now, there's just no line drawn20:20
cdentit's certainly all over the place20:20
cdentyeah20:21
SpamapSI have something coming up in meatspace, so I need to shut down the meeting. All good?20:21
cdentyarp20:21
SpamapSthanks so much for showing up ... happy holidays. See you all in 2017.20:22
SpamapS#endmeeting20:22
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:22
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 15 20:22:17 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:22
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/arch_wg/2016/arch_wg.2016-12-15-20.03.html20:22
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/arch_wg/2016/arch_wg.2016-12-15-20.03.txt20:22
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/arch_wg/2016/arch_wg.2016-12-15-20.03.log.html20:22
ttxSpamapS: thanks!20:22
*** stingaci_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:22
*** cdent has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:22
*** mfranc213_ has quit IRC20:22
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:23
*** mickeys_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:23
*** eggmaste` has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:23
*** eggmaster has quit IRC20:24
*** stingaci has quit IRC20:24
*** dkehn__ has quit IRC20:24
*** s3wong has quit IRC20:24
*** basilAB has quit IRC20:24
*** mickeys has quit IRC20:25
*** basilAB has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:25
*** mfranc213 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:26
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:26
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:27
*** sdake has quit IRC20:27
*** nadya has quit IRC20:29
*** lamt has quit IRC20:29
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:30
*** sdake has quit IRC20:36
*** kbyrne has quit IRC20:36
*** derekh has quit IRC20:41
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC20:45
*** tonytan_brb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:45
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:48
*** weshay is now known as weshay_bbiab20:51
*** s3wong_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:56
*** ankur-gupta has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** skelso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** s3wong has quit IRC20:58
loquacitiesanyone here for the docs meeting?20:59
iphutcho//20:59
skelsoI'm here.20:59
loquacitiesheya :)20:59
darrenchello o/20:59
loquacitiesi was wondering if anyone would come ;)20:59
bsilverman_o/20:59
loquacitiesoh hi darrenc20:59
ankur-guptao/20:59
loquacitiesok, let's get started :)21:00
loquacities#startmeeting docteam21:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Dec 15 21:00:07 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is loquacities. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: docteam)"21:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'docteam'21:00
*** knangia has quit IRC21:00
asettleHello21:01
asettleo/21:01
asettleSorry21:01
loquacities#topic Action items from the last meeting21:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Action items from the last meeting (Meeting topic: docteam)"21:01
asettleLate to the doccall21:01
loquacitiesdoesn't look like we have any actions21:01
loquacitiesasettle: hi!21:01
asettlehola!21:01
loquacities#topic Specs in review21:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Specs in review (Meeting topic: docteam)"21:01
asettleI have stayed awake!21:01
loquacities#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/docs-specs,n,z21:01
loquacities#link https://review.openstack.org/408558 [ha-guide] Proposal to improve the HA guide for Ocata/Pike21:01
asettleHello21:02
asettleThis is me21:02
loquacitiesindeed :)21:02
bsilverman_Hello Alex :slightly_smiling_face:21:02
asettleHEYA :D21:02
asettleWould love more reviews on this one :) bsilverman_ and the guys from the HA team have had a solid debate, I think we've agreed that it's to stay in the ha-guide21:02
*** stingaci_ has quit IRC21:03
asettleSo, if the core team is okay with this we should pass it21:03
asettleHowever, we do need a dedicated team21:03
asettle10/10 would recommend that we organise a sprint/swarm of some kind21:03
bsilverman_The point about it staying until the arch-guide is in better shape made sense.21:03
loquacitiesagreed21:03
*** kgiusti has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:03
*** stingaci has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:03
loquacitiesso we just need some core love on that one then21:03
asettlebsilverman_: absolutely 10/10 agree21:03
asettleI think so, yes21:03
asettleAnd then we can start some planning21:04
bsilverman_but at some point I definitely believe it needs to be decentralized again.21:04
asettlePlanning that should 100% happen in conjunction with the arch guide team. Perhaps we can merge?21:04
asettleMerge taems, that is.21:04
asettleteams*21:04
bsilverman_I think once we get a good handle on what we have, that way Shaun and I can contribute.21:04
bsilverman_to HA21:04
loquacitiescool21:05
loquacitiesok, the only other one we have is ...21:05
asettleSounds good, perhaps we merge the concentrated efforts. Those who are interested in the HA guide and Arch guide can have a joint specialty team?21:05
asettleFor now.21:05
asettleSorry.21:05
loquacities#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391786/  Proposed use case form21:05
asettleSepaking of the arch guide21:05
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
bsilverman_I thought we put this one to bed, but we still haven’t heard from Shaun have we?21:06
loquacitiesit's been banhammered21:06
asettleNo, I don't believe so. But I think we need to take ownership bsilverman_ he's been very busy with work21:06
loquacitiesi might just abandon it to get it off the radar21:06
asettleShaun's usually okay with that type of ownership21:06
asettleThoughts bsilverman_ ?21:06
bsilverman_We’re trying to solve a problem, if we’re going to abandon, we still are left with the problem.21:06
loquacitiesyes, but i'd rather resolve it on the mailing list than in gerrit21:07
loquacitiessame with the HA guide one, tbh21:07
bsilverman_So I think we need a new a new proposed solution.21:07
bsilverman_yea21:07
asettleOkay, perhaps we abandon that particular spec. And then we work on plan B.21:07
asettleThe HA guide spec should pass. I think that has relevant content that should be worked on.21:07
loquacitiesso, let's leave this out there, and when i get back from leave in jan, i'll follow up both of them on the mailing listy21:07
loquacitieslist*21:07
bsilverman_I am guilty of the gerrit abuse on HA :slightly_smiling_face:21:07
asettleloquacities: please, that would be good21:08
loquacitiesmeh, we all do it, bsilverman_ ;)21:08
asettleAdd as an action item, loquacities ?21:08
loquacitiesok, making a note21:08
loquacitiesyep21:08
asettleCool, thanks :)21:08
bsilverman_I have no problem with it as written21:08
loquacities#action loquacities to follow up on both specs in the new year on the mailing list21:08
loquacitiesok, let's move on21:08
loquacities#topic Speciality teams reports21:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Speciality teams reports (Meeting topic: docteam)"21:08
loquacitiesi suspect we can probably move through this pretty quickly21:08
loquacitiesi only have one speciality team report here, from john21:09
JRobinson__Hi all, sorry I was 5 minutes late.21:09
loquacitiesJRobinson__: hi!21:09
JRobinson__o/ loquacities21:09
*** egallen has quit IRC21:09
loquacitiesAPI: Anne Gentle21:09
loquacities(not here)21:09
loquacitiesConfiguration Reference and CLI Reference: Tomoyuki Kato21:09
loquacities(not here)21:09
loquacitiesHigh Availability Guide: Andrew Beekhof21:09
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:09
loquacitiesasettle: did you have anything to report on the HA guide?21:09
annegentleloquacities here21:09
loquacitiesoh! hi annegentle!21:10
annegentleohai21:10
loquacitiessorry, didn't see you sneak in :)21:10
asettleloquacities: ping me after API :p21:10
*** reedip_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:10
loquacitiesasettle: yep21:10
annegentlelink: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+file:api-ref21:10
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:10
annegentleOnly note from API land is that the teams are chugging along -- not many net-new API listings21:11
*** knangia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
annegentleBut plenty of reviews in progress21:11
loquacitiescool21:11
loquacitiesthanks annegentle21:11
loquacitiesasettle: HA guide?21:11
asettleHey!21:12
asettleSo, as we saw, the HA guide spec is underway21:12
asettleAlthough regardless of the spec I believe we should be very attentive to the HA guide blueprint at hand21:12
asettlehttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+spec/implement-ha-guide-todos21:12
asettleWhich is currently underway for anyone interested21:12
asettleWe are looking to spend some quality time going through the bug list: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bugs?field.tag=ha-guide21:12
loquacitiesdon't forget to link your patches to that blueprint, too21:12
asettleAnd figuring out what is still applicable (removing any of those out of date) and moving through the list of updates required21:12
asettleThank you loquacities :) that is important21:13
asettleIf anyone is interested in helping in the HA guide, hit us up. Last few weeks I have finished all edits I planned to do.21:13
asettleBut this is now a top priority regardless of spec.21:13
asettleBUGS \o/21:13
loquacitiescool21:13
loquacities:P21:13
* asettle takes a breath21:13
loquacitiesok, next up is21:13
loquacitiesHypervisor Tuning Guide: Joe Topjian21:13
loquacities(not here)21:13
loquacitiesInstallation guides: Lana Brindley21:14
loquacitiesSo, for install guides, we have a wireframe for you to look at21:14
loquacities#link https://openstack.invisionapp.com/share/ZF9OLTYND21:14
loquacitiesif you click on the little grid picture in the bottom right corner, you can see the two versions21:14
loquacitiesand if you click on comments you can read/leave comments21:14
loquacitiesin january, we'll need to make a decision on the final design, and start to create patches for it21:15
asettleOn that note, I liked the mockups.21:15
asettlethe first one.21:15
asettleWith the pictures.21:15
loquacitiesyeah, me too21:15
*** smcginnis has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:15
loquacitiesand i think it could work nicely to bring that design through to the main page eventually too21:15
loquacitiesanyway, that's all from install guides21:15
asettleIs this something we are planning to apply to the deployment stuff too?21:15
loquacitiesprobably, yes21:15
asettleOkay. Using mascots or...?21:15
loquacitiesno, probably by distro still21:16
annegentleis it not possible to see your own comments once you post them?21:16
annegentleI've posted two comments, does anyone see them?21:16
loquacitiesyep, you need to click on the numbers21:16
loquacitiesit's very unintuitive21:16
bsilverman_I left comments too, I liked the pictures.21:16
loquacitiesannegentle: i see your comments21:17
annegentleloquacities ok21:17
loquacitiescool, let's move on21:17
loquacitiesNetworking Guide: John Davidge21:17
loquacitiesfrom John:21:17
loquacitiesNot much from the networking guide this week. A couple more patches in flight to address the OSC transition. This one looks good to me:21:17
loquacitieshttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/410550/21:17
loquacitiesHaven’t looked at Ankur’s other patch yet but will get to it soon.21:17
loquacitiesOperations and Architecture Design guides: Shilla Saebi21:18
loquacitiesdarrenc: anything to add here?21:18
darrencnothing much to report21:18
loquacitiesok, np21:18
darrencwe've abandoned the specialty team meeting, and referred everyone to this meeting21:18
ankur-gupta:)21:18
loquacitiesoh, nice21:18
asettleCool darrenc :)21:18
loquacitiesok, next up ...21:19
loquacitiesSecurity Guide: Nathaniel Dillon21:19
loquacitiesI don't think Nathaniel is here?21:19
*** panda is now known as panda|Zz21:20
loquacitiesnope21:20
loquacitiesTraining Guides: Matjaz Pancur21:20
loquacities(not here)21:20
loquacitiesTraining labs: Pranav Salunke, Roger Luethi21:20
loquacitiesthose guys don't seem to be here, either21:20
*** tonytan_brb has quit IRC21:20
iphutchFor security guides I was looking to help out on docs but wasn't able to establish a source for up to date content.21:21
loquacitiesiphutch: in what context?21:21
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:21
iphutchAt the moment, the guide is out of date and needs review for nova and neutron21:21
iphutchbut beyond source code there hasn't been specific bugs filed for out of date content21:21
loquacitiesyeah, most of our aging bugs in the queue are security guide related, too21:22
loquacitiesi think it's starting to date quite badly21:22
loquacitiesperhaps we need to find out if nathaniel is still able to work on it21:22
iphutchagreed21:22
annegentleiphutch when you say "source" what do you mean?21:22
loquacitiesiphutch: do you mind taking that as an action? (to chase nathaniel)21:23
annegentleiphutch the doc source or a person?21:23
iphutchI should say, other than taking a deep dive into nova/neutron code to find up to date security info21:23
loquacitiesi'm not sure the source code would even help you much in that case21:23
asettleSo, that was actually me that recommended iphutch take on the install guide. Similar to how I've attacked the HA guide.21:23
loquacitiesasettle: it's a good plan21:24
asettleIn all honesty, a lot of the guides that were done in a sprint or otherwise are out of day21:24
asettledate*21:24
asettleArch, HA, security21:24
loquacitiesyep21:24
asettleWe have specialty teams but nobody is keeping it up to date21:24
asettleIt is good to have a writer AND an SME on board21:24
asettleBut we don't have that currently21:24
asettleI would be good if iphutch could go through the guide, edit it, file bugs, and report back with findings in a week21:24
loquacitiesok, let's make an action to chase this up21:24
*** reedip_ has quit IRC21:24
bsilverman_The security guide should probably outline best practices and refer any timely security patching to the foundation’s security team pages.21:24
loquacitiesbsilverman_: i believe that's the way it's structured, yes21:25
asettleBut we do need to address in the new year the fact that a lot of these guides are not being looked after and we do not have the bandwidth to do so21:25
loquacitiesagreed21:25
loquacities#action iphutch to chase up the security speciality team to discuss future of guide (with asettle and loquacities)21:26
iphutchI am happy to be the writer if I can get a SME on board21:26
loquacitiesok, last but not least is (drumroll please)21:26
iphutchwill do21:26
asettleiphutch: thank you :)21:26
loquacitiesUser guides: Joseph Robinson21:26
loquacitiesJRobinson__: what do you have?21:26
asettle\o/21:26
JRobinson__The Legacy command changes are continuing at the moment21:26
JRobinson__I've updated the task list with more files21:26
JRobinson__#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/ReorganizeUserGuides#Legacy_to_OpenStack_command_conversion_table21:27
bsilverman_I have a whole chapter in an upcoming book on OpenStack security, when it’s published next month, I’ll send you the chapter ophutch.21:27
JRobinson__I'm aiming to have all the commands from the End User Guide added.21:27
bsilverman_err iphutch21:27
loquacitiesnice work, JRobinson__ :)21:27
loquacitiesok, any final comments on speciality teams?21:28
asettleJRobinson__: do you have any books complete yet?21:28
JRobinson__One more bug item -21:28
asettleSlash, could you tell us what is left to do etC?21:28
*** reedip_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:28
JRobinson__asettle, at the moment, I'd say about maybe over half the end user guide has been worked through.21:28
JRobinson__As a goal I want to get that one compelted.21:29
JRobinson__^completed21:29
asettleCool :) that's great. Admin guide?21:29
asettleI've seen a lot of patches. And ankur-gupta has been helping out a lot too floating between the config guides too I believe.21:29
JRobinson__The Administrator guide needs attention, maybe a bit after that, but time constraints means I'll start listing commands from there too within the next week.21:29
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:29
JRobinson__for sure, and thanks ankur-gupta for your help here :)21:30
JRobinson__That bug question:21:30
JRobinson__#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/164810121:30
openstackLaunchpad bug 1648101 in openstack-manuals "ip netns - needed for cheat sheet in End User Guide?" [Undecided,New]21:30
ankur-guptaYes please let me know if there is anything else i can help out with21:30
annegentleJRobinson__ I learned that is a Linux-only command.21:30
annegentleJRobinson__ and since our CLI installation instructions also cover Win/Mac I wonder if it's necessary.21:30
annegentleAnyone have an opinion?21:31
JRobinson__annegentle, yes, it looked like a specific use case. Not sure how often users had encountered or sed the $ ip netns command21:31
loquacitiesit should at least be marked, either way21:31
JRobinson__^used.21:31
annegentleloquacities that might be the clearest way to show it21:32
loquacitiesok21:32
loquacitiesshall we move on then?21:32
annegentleJRobinson__ I can take that bug21:32
bsilverman_It’s used a lot in troubleshooting linux network issues with instances.21:32
JRobinson__ankur-gupta, if anything on the table leaps out, go for it - I can update the table after the patch is up, so don't worry about the admin side of things too much.21:32
annegentlebsilverman_ yeah21:32
annegentleJRobinson__ can you triage it for me?21:32
JRobinson__annegentle, thanks, yes, triage now21:33
loquacities#topic Countdown to release:21:33
*** openstack changes topic to "Countdown to release: (Meeting topic: docteam)"21:33
bsilverman_It’s the only way I know to really find out about the namespaces that instances are using.21:33
loquacities68 days to go21:33
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:33
loquacities#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/OcataDeliverables21:33
annegentlebsilverman_ yeah, but you do need to be on a Linux machine to use it, so we should indicate that.21:33
loquacities#topic PTG Atlanta Feb 20-24 201721:34
*** openstack changes topic to "PTG Atlanta Feb 20-24 2017 (Meeting topic: docteam)"21:34
loquacities#link http://www.openstack.org/ptg Event info21:34
loquacities#link https://pikeptg.eventbrite.com/ Tickets21:34
loquacitiesi believe there are still tickets available21:34
bsilverman_annegentle: agreed.21:34
loquacities#info Docs is on Monday/Tuesday21:34
loquacities#topic Open discussion21:34
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: docteam)"21:34
asettleAnyone going?21:34
asettleTo the PTG21:34
asettleThat is21:34
*** nadya has quit IRC21:34
annegentleyep, I'll be there asettle21:34
*** jmckind_ has quit IRC21:35
asettleCool! In theory I will be, but *stay tuned*21:35
annegentlenice21:35
bsilverman_I still need to get approval, need to explain it to company.21:35
JRobinson__I'm aiming to go - approval is also under discussion.21:35
iphutchIll be there if we get the final budget thumbs up21:35
bsilverman_Have they announced what the “discount” will be off of the Boston summit if we go?21:35
loquacitiesnot that i've seen21:36
annegentleI had a topic I want to bring up here first --21:36
JRobinson__#info the ticket refund date is February 13 - time available for refunds depending on team and organisation budgets.21:36
annegentleI noticed a few "cinder" CLI commands in the Horizon UI21:36
asettleOhhhh I see, good info JRobinson__21:36
annegentleas explanatory text.21:36
bsilverman_true21:36
asettleannegentle: oh?21:36
*** ankur-gupta has quit IRC21:36
asettleHave you an example anywhere?21:36
annegentleDo you think it would be ok to propose a blueprint to move those to osc after the docs are updated?21:36
annegentleasettle just a sec, yeah21:37
asettleAlso, I should mention to those that are doing the CLI command conversion, I spoke to Joe too... do not change swift commands.21:37
asettleSwift is sticking with 'swift' until further notice.21:37
asettleThe 'openstack' command is not entirely supported.21:37
loquacitiesannegentle: yes, i think that's a good idea21:37
annegentleso, log in as admin, go to Admin > Volumes and then click Create Volume Type.21:37
annegentleI don't think there's a huge number of them but it would be nice to update21:37
annegentle"This is equivalent to the cinder type-create command."21:38
annegentleSo it's not even the entire command.21:38
asettleInteresting annegentle I hadn't see that. Thank you!21:38
asettleIs that a cinder bug or it just incomplete? Or a horizon thing?21:38
asettleThat's confusing.21:38
annegentleasettle I see it as a horizon bug21:38
loquacitiesmaybe we should ping horizon21:39
annegentleasettle but I may not understand their plugin model21:39
asettleOkay, should we file? I mean, I feel bad, it's only Richard and Rob that are basically Horizon now21:39
annegentleasettle as to where the strings "live"21:39
asettleannegentle: fair enough21:39
annegentleasettle  oh we could do these edits ourselves21:39
asettleloquacities: could you ping Richard?21:39
annegentlethat's why I'm bringing it up here21:39
*** s3wong_ is now known as s3wong21:39
asettleannegentle: we could? Okay. We should then.21:39
loquacitiesyeah, sure21:39
annegentlebut need to understand where those strings are, what translation affect it might have, whether the strings will still fit in boxes, etc.21:39
david-lylewhat's the ask for horizon?21:40
annegentleI bet Richard would know that sort of stuff21:40
loquacities#action loquacities to ping Richard Jones about cinder commands in horizon21:40
annegentlehey david-lyle21:40
david-lylehi annegentle :)21:40
annegentledavid-lyle ask could be "hey are these pluggable strings and how do I edit them and would it affect translations and box sizes"21:40
asettledavid-lyle: it's like you have a radar for the word 'horizon'21:40
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
david-lyleI do watch for it21:41
annegentledavid-lyle and "hey are the strings stored closer to cinder or horizon?"21:41
david-lyleall the strings should be from horizon21:41
annegentledavid-lyle for reviews and such21:41
asettledavid-lyle: I do that for 'docs' :P21:41
david-lylewe try not to pass on any unlocalized strings to users21:41
david-lyleso if there is an issue with some text, filing a bug in horizon is the best place.21:42
asettleannegentle: in that case, we can probably do it?21:42
david-lyleplugins can provide strings as well, but cinder support is internal to horizon21:42
annegentledavid-lyle ok21:42
david-lylesomething like manila or sahara would own their own strings21:42
annegentledavid-lyle but if the size of the text changes is that a non-issue?21:42
annegentlecinder is fewer letters than openstack for example21:42
annegentledavid-lyle I might be overthinking :)21:43
david-lylegenerally it is not21:43
annegentlegreat21:43
annegentleyeah this seems like a nice next evolution of "OSC everywhere"21:43
david-lylewe try to make all text containers vary their size based on content21:43
annegentleasettle yeah I really do think so. To me the hard part would be building horizon locally but we have devstack.21:43
annegentleasettle heh we have our PTG hack project :)21:44
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC21:44
annegentle"Figure out horizon help strings"21:44
asettleannegentle: I would really like to go through that with you at the PTG? It's good to learn new things (like last time? Yay deployment guides)21:44
annegentleasettle yes!!21:44
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:45
annegentleme too21:45
asettleLet's hack it out :) should be good!21:45
david-lyleI'll be at the PTG, please ping me however I can help21:45
annegentledavid-lyle awesome, consider yourself roped in :)21:45
asettledavid-lyle: we may seek you out to bash horizon into our submission :P21:45
asettleAnne's version seems nicer21:46
annegentleasettle hee21:46
david-lyleit never worked for me, but with your help we may make more progreess21:46
annegentledavid-lyle heh21:46
asettle\o/ we will do our best21:46
asettleShe says21:46
asettleNow21:46
asettleWithout much conviction21:46
loquacitiesis that it, guys?21:47
loquacitiesthanks for a good meeting21:47
asettlehahahah21:47
asettleYes sorry21:47
loquacitiesand have a great holiday, those who are getting one :)21:47
loquacities#endmeeting21:47
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:47
openstackMeeting ended Thu Dec 15 21:47:41 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:47
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/docteam/2016/docteam.2016-12-15-21.00.html21:47
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/docteam/2016/docteam.2016-12-15-21.00.txt21:47
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/docteam/2016/docteam.2016-12-15-21.00.log.html21:47
asettleAND SHE ENDS IT SWIFTLY21:47
annegentle:) thanks all and have a great holiday21:48
*** smcginnis has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:48
JRobinson__For sure, have a good holiday everyone. Thanks for a good meeting. On track with a lot of goals :)21:48
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC21:48
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:49
bsilverman_o///21:49
bsilverman_Have a happy holiday season everyone.21:49
asettleo/ happy holidays!21:50
*** sdake has quit IRC21:51
*** cknight has quit IRC21:51
iphutcho/ happy holidays!!21:51
*** adrian_otto1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:54
*** adrian_otto1 has quit IRC21:54
*** edtubill has quit IRC21:55
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC21:55
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC21:56
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:58
*** asettle has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:00
*** ansmith has quit IRC22:01
*** kfarr has quit IRC22:02
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:04
*** bnemec has quit IRC22:10
*** ashcrack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:14
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:16
*** gouthamr has quit IRC22:16
*** tpsilva has quit IRC22:21
*** jheroux has quit IRC22:21
*** jmckind has quit IRC22:22
*** reedip_ has quit IRC22:23
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:25
*** JRobinson__ is now known as JRobinson__afk22:26
*** skelso has quit IRC22:28
*** msimonin has quit IRC22:29
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:29
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC22:33
*** jcoufal has quit IRC22:34
*** ianychoi has quit IRC22:38
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:40
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax22:40
*** yamamoto has quit IRC22:40
*** mdong_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:41
*** haleyb is now known as haleyb-away22:41
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC22:42
*** mdong has quit IRC22:42
*** mdong_ is now known as mdong22:42
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:43
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:43
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:44
*** baoli has quit IRC22:45
*** sdake has quit IRC22:45
*** egallen_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:47
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK22:48
*** JRobinson__afk is now known as JRobinson__22:48
*** egallen has quit IRC22:49
*** egallen_ is now known as egallen22:49
*** msimonin has quit IRC22:50
*** myoung is now known as myoung|afk22:50
*** Swami has quit IRC22:54
*** jaypipes has quit IRC23:02
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax23:03
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC23:04
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:06
*** beslemon has quit IRC23:07
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:07
*** fnaval has quit IRC23:08
*** sdake_ has quit IRC23:08
*** raliev has quit IRC23:08
*** raliev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:08
*** ashcrack has quit IRC23:09
*** neilus has quit IRC23:10
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC23:12
*** markvoelker has quit IRC23:13
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:15
*** Leom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:17
*** Leom_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:20
*** Leo_ has quit IRC23:20
*** hurricanerix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:22
*** Leom has quit IRC23:24
*** Leom_ has quit IRC23:25
*** gyee has quit IRC23:36
*** singlethink has quit IRC23:37
*** pradk has quit IRC23:38
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:40
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:40
*** yuanying_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:41
*** sdake has quit IRC23:43
*** yuanying_ has quit IRC23:45
*** yamamoto has quit IRC23:50
*** cdelatte has quit IRC23:55
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:55
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC23:57
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!