| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 00:01 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 00:10 | |
| *** carloss has quit IRC | 00:43 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has quit IRC | 01:05 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 01:06 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 01:15 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 01:17 | |
| *** megheisler has quit IRC | 01:19 | |
| *** megheisler has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 01:20 | |
| *** ricolin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 01:21 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 02:04 | |
| *** ricolin_ has quit IRC | 02:11 | |
| *** ricolin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 02:11 | |
| *** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 02:20 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 02:37 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 03:05 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 03:10 | |
| *** jhouser has quit IRC | 03:20 | |
| *** subbareddy has quit IRC | 03:23 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 03:26 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 03:27 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 03:31 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 04:06 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 04:10 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 04:27 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 04:32 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 04:44 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 04:48 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 04:52 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 04:54 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 04:55 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 05:09 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 05:13 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 05:14 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 05:21 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
| *** dviroel has quit IRC | 05:39 | |
| *** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 05:41 | |
| *** ricolin has quit IRC | 06:00 | |
| *** zoharm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 06:12 | |
| *** ricolin_ has quit IRC | 06:27 | |
| *** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 06:28 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 06:47 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 06:52 | |
| *** vhari has quit IRC | 07:10 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 07:27 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 07:38 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 07:39 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 07:39 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 07:48 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 08:15 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 08:31 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 08:33 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 08:44 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 08:49 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 09:08 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 09:18 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 09:21 | |
| *** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 09:36 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:07 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 10:12 | |
| *** rdopiera has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:19 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:27 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 10:42 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:52 | |
| *** dviroel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:55 | |
| *** lamt has quit IRC | 11:05 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 11:13 | |
| *** carloss has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 11:16 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 11:18 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 11:20 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 11:22 | |
| *** vhari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 11:43 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 12:19 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:46 | |
| *** ajitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:47 | |
| *** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:47 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:01 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
| *** Luzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:47 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:50 | |
| *** rosmaita has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:58 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:58 | |
| *** almir-okato has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:58 | |
| *** felipe_rodrigues has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:58 | |
| rosmaita | #startmeeting cinder | 14:00 |
|---|---|---|
| openstack | Meeting started Wed Feb 24 14:00:00 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rosmaita. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:00 |
| rosmaita | #topic roll call | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:00 | |
| whoami-rajat | Hi | 14:00 |
| eharney | hi | 14:00 |
| almir-okato | hi | 14:00 |
| e0ne | hi | 14:01 |
| enriquetaso | hi | 14:01 |
| tosky | hi | 14:01 |
| rosmaita | hello everyone | 14:01 |
| zoharm | hi | 14:01 |
| rosmaita | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-wallaby-meetings | 14:01 |
| rosmaita | ok, let's get started | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | #topic announcements | 14:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:02 | |
| rosmaita | assert:supports-api-interoperability tag has been approved for cinder | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/773684 | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | hooray! | 14:02 |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 14:02 | |
| rosmaita | upcoming deadlines | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | next week: wallaby os-brick release | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | week after that: wallaby cinderclient release plus wallaby feature freeze | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | so the end of the cycle is coming up fast | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | btw, with february being so short, i lost track that this is the last meeting of the month | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | which would normally mean a video meeting, but we'll do it next month | 14:04 |
| * whoami-rajat just realised this is the last meeting of feb | 14:04 | |
| rosmaita | apologies to anyone really looking forward to a video meeting | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | that's all the announcements from me, any else have something to mention? | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | i should give a shout out to eharney for his suggestion about the festival of XS reviews we had last week | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | i think a good time was had by all | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | and we should do it again | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | probably soon-ish | 14:06 |
| *** sfernand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:06 | |
| rosmaita | in case i am being to subtle, i am looking for feedback about how often we should have such a festival | 14:07 |
| eharney | often, until we have a much smaller review backlog :) | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | exactly | 14:07 |
| enriquetaso | agree | 14:08 |
| rosmaita | maybe right after feature freeze, we can get a jump on bug fix reviews | 14:08 |
| rosmaita | and speaking of bugs ... | 14:08 |
| *** rratnaka has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:08 | |
| rosmaita | #topic Wallaby R-1 Bug Review | 14:08 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Wallaby R-1 Bug Review (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:08 | |
| rosmaita | enriquetaso: you have the floor | 14:09 |
| enriquetaso | R-7* | 14:09 |
| enriquetaso | Hello, we have 5 bugs reported since last week (2 Cinder, 1 Cinder clienta and 2 OsBrick) | 14:09 |
| enriquetaso | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-wallaby-r7-bug-review | 14:09 |
| enriquetaso | bug_1: [os-brick] iSCSI+Multipath: Volume attachment hangs if session scanning fails | 14:09 |
| enriquetaso | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-brick/+bug/1915678 | 14:09 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1915678 in os-brick "iSCSI+Multipath: Volume attachment hungs if sessiong scanning fails" [High,New] | 14:09 |
| enriquetaso | Currently we execute login to iscsi portals and device discovery in multiple threads concurrently.However if some commands like "multiple -m session", the thread can abort immediately without updating any counters like failed_logins or stopped_threads properly, because there are no try-except blocks to catch exceptions.However the main thread keeps waiting until these counters are updated, and this results in stuck volume | 14:09 |
| enriquetaso | attachment process. | 14:09 |
| enriquetaso | I think some people is already working on this but I couldn't find the gerrit links | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | yeah, reminder to people working on bugs: | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | the auto-update between gerrit and launchpad is broken | 14:11 |
| enriquetaso | The next one is small thing but I think we'd like to fix this before wallaby cinderclient release | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | so if you put up a patch to fix a bug, please open the bug in launchpad and add the review link yourself | 14:11 |
| tosky | enriquetaso: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/775545 ? | 14:12 |
| enriquetaso | tosky++ | 14:12 |
| enriquetaso | OK, I think we'd like to fix this before wallaby cinderclient release | 14:13 |
| enriquetaso | bug_2: [cinder client] Fetching server version fails to support passing client certificates | 14:13 |
| enriquetaso | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-cinderclient/+bug/1915996 | 14:13 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1915996 in python-cinderclient "Fetching server version fails to support passing client certificates" [Medium,New] - Assigned to Sri Harsha mekala (harshayahoo) | 14:13 |
| enriquetaso | >> from cinderclient import client as cinder_client | 14:13 |
| enriquetaso | >> min_ver, max_ver = cinder_client.get_server_version(cin_url) | 14:13 |
| enriquetaso | >> exception_from_error_queue | 14:13 |
| enriquetaso | raise exception_type(errors) | 14:13 |
| enriquetaso | OpenSSL.SSL.Error: [('SSL routines', 'ssl3_read_bytes', 'sslv3 alert handshake failure')] | 14:13 |
| enriquetaso | cinder_client.get_server_version fails | 14:14 |
| eharney | this bug assumes that we support strict mTLS from cinderclient which i don't know is a reasonable assumption | 14:15 |
| eharney | worth looking into if someone is already working on it | 14:15 |
| enriquetaso | It's Assigned to Sri Harsha mekala but again no link | 14:15 |
| enriquetaso | I'll try to find it after the meeting | 14:16 |
| rosmaita | or maybe tosky can do his gerrit search magic | 14:16 |
| enriquetaso | ha | 14:16 |
| enriquetaso | bug_3: [docs] Install and configure a storage node in cinder | 14:16 |
| enriquetaso | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1916258 | 14:16 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1916258 in Cinder "[docs] Install and configure a storage node in cinder" [Low,New] | 14:16 |
| enriquetaso | Looks like the documentation is outdated. | 14:17 |
| enriquetaso | The 'python-keystone' should be replace to 'python3-keystone.However, | 14:17 |
| enriquetaso | I can't find the python3-keystone[1] in RDO but it's on Ubuntu 20. | 14:17 |
| enriquetaso | [1] https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-master/component/tempest/3e/05/3e05a15d9c4c889aba8c4aad9e24ba8a8a71b7f3_a65d35cc/rpmbuild.log | 14:17 |
| *** TusharTgite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:17 | |
| eharney | i guess we have an in-tree doc about RDO packages that is not up to date | 14:18 |
| enriquetaso | yep | 14:18 |
| enriquetaso | bug_4: [cinder] XtremIO does not support ports filtering | 14:18 |
| eharney | i'm kind of surprised people are using cinder docs to hand-build an RDO deployment at this point | 14:19 |
| enriquetaso | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1915800 | 14:19 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1915800 in Cinder "XtremIO does not support ports filtering" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Ivan Pchelintsev (pcheli) | 14:19 |
| enriquetaso | Looks like this new implementation broke the support filtering https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/775798 | 14:19 |
| enriquetaso | The bug is already assigned. | 14:19 |
| enriquetaso | That's all I have for now :) | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | ok, great ... thanks enriquetaso | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | i think we'd like to get https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/775545 into the release next week if possible | 14:20 |
| rosmaita | so please prioritize that review | 14:20 |
| eharney | i already -1'd it | 14:20 |
| rosmaita | that was fast | 14:21 |
| rosmaita | ok, so when eric's revision has happened, please look for that patch | 14:21 |
| rosmaita | ok, next topic is another brick fix we need to prioritize | 14:21 |
| rosmaita | #topic os-brick nvmeof connector regression in 4.2.0 | 14:22 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "os-brick nvmeof connector regression in 4.2.0 (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:22 | |
| rosmaita | let me get some links down for the record | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/os-brick/+bug/1916264 | 14:22 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1916264 in os-brick "NVMeOFConnector can't connect volume" [Medium,New] - Assigned to Zohar Mamedov (zoharm) | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | ^^ the bug | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | announcement to operators | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-February/020627.html | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | announcement to us | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-February/020628.html | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | and zoharm's current patch: | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/777086 | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | e0ne put up a revert patch, there's some discussion on it about how to fix this | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/776441 | 14:24 |
| rosmaita | the current patch introduces compatability code into the nvmeof connector to make it backward compatible | 14:24 |
| e0ne | it's not an ideal solution, but we're in the end of cycle | 14:25 |
| e0ne | splitting into two connectors will require nova change too | 14:25 |
| e0ne | that's why we decided to make this fix for now | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | i think it makes sense given the situation | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | but cinder cores, please look at this patch! | 14:26 |
| e0ne | I didn't review the patch yet | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/777086 | 14:26 |
| e0ne | but I tested it manually and we restored CI | 14:26 |
| zoharm | it is definitely less than ideal, i think ultimately in a further release we could have all drivers use the same driver | 14:27 |
| zoharm | same connector* - ie, unify the API | 14:27 |
| rosmaita | so e0ne , is mellanox ci responding now? | 14:27 |
| rosmaita | or do you still have to trigger it manually? | 14:27 |
| e0ne | rosmaita: I'm not sure auto build is enabled now, need to check it | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | ok | 14:28 |
| *** Luzi has quit IRC | 14:28 | |
| e0ne | rosmaita: but we trigger it by adding 'retrigger-mlnx-spdk' comment | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | so we can trigger it from zoharm's patch? | 14:28 |
| zoharm | i saw it has been triggered there and had a successful run | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | ok, cool | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | this gives us a check for regressions | 14:29 |
| zoharm | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/777086/4#message-10c5858a614dacdc829c8b008056515ca9bd1ef7 | 14:29 |
| e0ne | rosmaita: it passed for patchset #2, newer patchsets updated commit message and unit-tests only | 14:30 |
| rosmaita | also, anyone out there with a FC driver that uses the nvmeof brick connector ... please check your CI | 14:30 |
| rosmaita | it may only be SPDK , but it's hard to tell | 14:30 |
| rosmaita | zoharm: maybe you can add the retrigger comment whenever you upload a new patch set | 14:31 |
| zoharm | sounds good | 14:32 |
| rosmaita | ok, so cinder cores ... please prioritize reviewing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/777086/ this week | 14:33 |
| rosmaita | we need to get this fixed before next week's brick release | 14:33 |
| hemna | I'll take a look | 14:33 |
| rosmaita | hemna: ty | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | #topic new option or just do it? | 14:34 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "new option or just do it? (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:34 | |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/766856 | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | that patch proposes to support fast-diff for RBD backups | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | but it introduces a config option to turn it on | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | and it also checks to make sure the backend supports it | 14:35 |
| rosmaita | the question came up last week that maybe we should just check to see if fast-diff is supported by the backend, and if so, use it | 14:35 |
| rosmaita | without requiring configuration | 14:35 |
| *** tmazur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:35 | |
| rosmaita | i think that makes sense (which is why i am bringing it up!) | 14:36 |
| e0ne | or try to use scheduler hints for that | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | but i want to get feedback from the wider community | 14:36 |
| eharney | i think we should do that | 14:36 |
| hemna | is there a specific version that is required ? | 14:36 |
| eharney | why scheduler hints..? | 14:36 |
| eharney | fast-diff is supported in all versions of ceph that we support, it was added years ago | 14:36 |
| e0ne | eharney: it that case is should be safe | 14:37 |
| hemna | if that's the case, then I would vote for not needing a conf for it, unless there is a specific reason why the driver shouldn't use it if it's on? | 14:37 |
| eharney | it was in infernalis if not before | 14:37 |
| e0ne | eharney: how incremental backups will work if we enable fast-diff? | 14:37 |
| eharney | the only thing that fast-diff changes is how changes are tracked between images/snaps on the ceph backend, backups would presumably work the same | 14:38 |
| e0ne | sounds good to me | 14:41 |
| rosmaita | ok, so it sounds like the consensus is to ask the proposer to revise the patch to remove the config option | 14:41 |
| eharney | this patch does make me think that we need to check whether we need something similar for rbd volumes, or if we are already doing the ideal thing there | 14:41 |
| rosmaita | also, looking at the docstring for the file, it could probably use a revision too | 14:42 |
| rosmaita | suggests using at least Ceph Dumpling | 14:42 |
| eharney | heh | 14:43 |
| rosmaita | eharney: if you don't have time to look, maybe file a bug so we don't forget to check | 14:43 |
| rosmaita | #topic Zadara cinder driver new features review | 14:43 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Zadara cinder driver new features review (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:43 | |
| rosmaita | rratnaka: that's you | 14:43 |
| *** Luzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:43 | |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/774463 | 14:44 |
| rratnaka | Hi everyone. | 14:44 |
| rratnaka | Great pleasure meeting community folks | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | we are happy to have you here! | 14:44 |
| rratnaka | As rosmaita shared the review link, I am here to highlight my review requests | 14:44 |
| rratnaka | *request | 14:44 |
| rratnaka | I have addressed adding new features to Zadara cinder driver and targetted to push to Wallaby release | 14:45 |
| rratnaka | I addressed first set of review comments | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | when you say "update code layout" , do you mean moving some functions to common ? | 14:45 |
| rratnaka | yeah | 14:45 |
| rratnaka | Requesting to take a look for review and provide set of comments | 14:46 |
| rosmaita | ok, so though it looks like a big change, it's mostly rearranging | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | i like adding 500 lines of tests, that's always good to see | 14:47 |
| rratnaka | Along with that added few features like multiattach, ipv6 | 14:47 |
| rratnaka | and other apiś like get_manageable_volumes/snapshots | 14:47 |
| rratnaka | yeah. I have added the test cases too | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | ok, great. can you add a blueprint to track this: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/wallaby | 14:48 |
| rratnaka | Do we still have bandwidth to add the changes to Wallaby? | 14:48 |
| rratnaka | sure rosmaita. I will add a blueprint | 14:49 |
| rosmaita | ok, will help us make sure everyone is aware | 14:49 |
| rosmaita | to answer the bandwidth question, let's see how the initial reviews go | 14:50 |
| rosmaita | anything else? | 14:50 |
| rratnaka | yeah. totally agree. | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | thanks | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | #topic Stable release update | 14:51 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Stable release update (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:51 | |
| rratnaka | thatś it from my end. Awaiting the review comments. Thanks | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stable-releases-review-tracker-22-02-2021 | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | whoami-rajat: that's you | 14:51 |
| whoami-rajat | thanks rosmaita | 14:51 |
| whoami-rajat | so this week there were not many reviews in stable branches | 14:52 |
| whoami-rajat | victoria had 1 patch which rosmaita approved | 14:52 |
| whoami-rajat | ussuri and train still has 3-4 patches unmerged | 14:52 |
| whoami-rajat | I'm not sure if i should go ahead with victoria release after the last change merges or wait for ussuri and train to propose release simultaneously | 14:53 |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:53 | |
| whoami-rajat | rosmaita: thoughts ? ^ | 14:53 |
| rosmaita | i dont know that there's any advantage to a simultaneous release | 14:53 |
| rosmaita | anyone have any observations? | 14:54 |
| rosmaita | actually, forget i said that | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | or maybe not | 14:55 |
| * whoami-rajat confused | 14:55 | |
| enriquetaso | :P | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | the key thing is that we never want the situation where an earlier release (like train) contains a fix that isn't in the next release (ussuri) | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | so people don't break on upgrade | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | that shouldn't be happening because we propose backports in order | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | so if you release victoria now, and then u & t in a week or so, that should be ik | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | *ok | 14:57 |
| whoami-rajat | oh, release wise, yes | 14:57 |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 14:57 | |
| rosmaita | you got it | 14:57 |
| *** jhouser has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:57 | |
| whoami-rajat | ok, will propose the victoria release this week and wait for ussuri and train to get cleaned up | 14:58 |
| rosmaita | ok, everyone needs to concentrate mostly on os-brick anyway, so other than u and t cleanup, we shouldn't have much backport action | 14:58 |
| rosmaita | thanks, rajat | 14:58 |
| rosmaita | #topic open discussion | 14:59 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:59 | |
| rosmaita | for 45 seconds | 14:59 |
| whoami-rajat | also tosky had one question on the meeting pad, not sure if I answered it properly | 14:59 |
| rosmaita | i think you answered correctly, we don't know that v backports are relevant to earlier branches until someone proposes them | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | ok, make way for horizon! | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | thanks everyone | 15:00 |
| whoami-rajat | thanks! | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | #endmeeting | 15:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 15:00 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed Feb 24 15:00:22 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2021/cinder.2021-02-24-14.00.html | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2021/cinder.2021-02-24-14.00.txt | 15:00 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2021/cinder.2021-02-24-14.00.log.html | 15:00 |
| e0ne | #startmeeting horizon | 15:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Wed Feb 24 15:00:49 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is e0ne. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'horizon' | 15:00 |
| amotoki | hi | 15:01 |
| rdopiera | o/ | 15:01 |
| e0ne | hi | 15:02 |
| tmazur | o/ | 15:02 |
| e0ne | #topic Notices | 15:03 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Notices (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:03 | |
| e0ne | #link https://releases.openstack.org/wallaby/schedule.html | 15:04 |
| e0ne | there are two weeks left until feature freeze | 15:04 |
| e0ne | technically, horizon has different release model but it would be good to freeze features for Wallaby release | 15:05 |
| amotoki | +1. Appropriate releases of horizon would be helpful :) | 15:06 |
| e0ne | so let's review new features if any are proposed | 15:07 |
| e0ne | next week is 'Final release for non-client libraries' | 15:07 |
| e0ne | nothing special for horizon | 15:07 |
| *** zoharm has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
| e0ne | amotoki: do you want to merge django 3.x support in this release? | 15:09 |
| amotoki | e0ne: no | 15:09 |
| amotoki | it just flushes my working branches | 15:09 |
| amotoki | for backup :) | 15:09 |
| e0ne | ok | 15:09 |
| amotoki | btw, while I am not sure that "Notices" seciton of the "Weekly meeting" in the etherpad works I updated two topics from me there. | 15:10 |
| amotoki | they are about "tempest-horizon retirement" and "chinese locale rename". | 15:10 |
| amotoki | around L.35 in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-release-priorities | 15:10 |
| amotoki | I don't repeat them here :) | 15:11 |
| e0ne | amotoki: thanks | 15:12 |
| e0ne | rdopiera: let's review https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22merge-horizon-test%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 15:13 |
| e0ne | others review are welcome too :) | 15:13 |
| amotoki | project-config/openstack-zuul-jobs reviews usually take time due to the lack of reviews as you may know. | 15:13 |
| rdopiera | I missed that, sorry | 15:13 |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:13 | |
| e0ne | amotoki: it's good to get in in this release | 15:14 |
| amotoki | hopefully so :p | 15:15 |
| e0ne | :) | 15:15 |
| e0ne | any other updates? | 15:18 |
| e0ne | let's move forward | 15:20 |
| e0ne | #topic Feature deprecation candidates | 15:20 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Feature deprecation candidates (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:20 | |
| e0ne | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-release-priorities line #17 | 15:20 |
| amotoki | I reviewed feature gaps in the angular launch instance form in https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-feature-gap | 15:22 |
| amotoki | and most gaps have been closed. | 15:22 |
| amotoki | I wonder we can mark the django launch instance form as deprecated. | 15:22 |
| amotoki | thought? | 15:22 |
| rdopiera | that would mean removing it in 18? | 15:23 |
| amotoki | rdopiera: what do you mean by "18"? | 15:24 |
| rdopiera | wallaby+1 | 15:24 |
| rdopiera | sorry | 15:24 |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
| amotoki | hmm... wallaby release will be 19.y.z... | 15:24 |
| rdopiera | yeah, we skipped a release internally at rh, so now all our versions are off by one | 15:25 |
| rdopiera | it's confusing | 15:25 |
| amotoki | ah... you mean RHOSP version | 15:25 |
| rdopiera | but I meant W+1 | 15:25 |
| rdopiera | X I guess? | 15:25 |
| e0ne | I'm OK with deprecating it | 15:26 |
| tmazur | Regarding tab navigation, I am going to work on it when I have time | 15:27 |
| tmazur | But it's definitely not a blocker | 15:28 |
| amotoki | tmazur: sounds fine. it is common in all angularjs impls, so I think we can address it separately | 15:28 |
| e0ne | but before removing I would like to have some feedback from users and operators | 15:28 |
| amotoki | The deprecation does not always mean we drop it in the next release. I believe the deprecation could trigger more feedbacks. | 15:29 |
| e0ne | amotoki: +1 | 15:30 |
| rdopiera | good point | 15:31 |
| tmazur | +1 | 15:31 |
| amotoki | IMHO it is a burden to maintain two overlapping implementations so once we close the gaps it is time to mark eitherr of them as deprecated. that's the original motivation :) | 15:33 |
| e0ne | let's deprecate it | 15:36 |
| *** TusharTgite has quit IRC | 15:37 | |
| e0ne | anything more to add? | 15:42 |
| -amotoki- got disconnected for a while | 15:43 | |
| e0ne | let's move on | 15:43 |
| e0ne | How/When we would like to clean up here (On-demand agenda)? What are still needed and what are already unnecessary (amotoki) | 15:43 |
| e0ne | #topic How/When we would like to clean up here (On-demand agenda)? What are still needed and what are already unnecessary (amotoki) | 15:43 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "How/When we would like to clean up here (On-demand agenda)? What are still needed and what are already unnecessary (amotoki) (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:43 | |
| e0ne | originally, it was supposed to have something like https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-wallaby-meetings | 15:43 |
| e0ne | but due to the lack of topics per each meeting no body updated it in that manner | 15:44 |
| amotoki | WHat in my mind is like https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings#On_Demand_Agenda | 15:44 |
| e0ne | and the result is: unmanageable etherpad with old topics :( | 15:45 |
| amotoki | in case of neutron we clean up the contents every week | 15:45 |
| amotoki | we depend on the history of the wiki | 15:45 |
| amotoki | so perhaps we need some consensus | 15:45 |
| e0ne | amotoki: should should rearrange etherpad | 15:46 |
| amotoki | e0ne: +1 | 15:46 |
| e0ne | amotoki: do you propose to switch back to wiki? | 15:46 |
| amotoki | e0ne: not necessarily | 15:46 |
| e0ne | ok, let me try to fix our etherpad until next meeting | 15:47 |
| e0ne | 4 | 15:48 |
| amotoki | e0ne: thanks. etherpad is no problem. what we need is a common understanding :) | 15:48 |
| e0ne | +2 | 15:48 |
| e0ne | #topic Open Discussion | 15:50 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:50 | |
| *** subbareddy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:50 | |
| amotoki | nothing from me. | 15:52 |
| tmazur | nothing from my side | 15:53 |
| amotoki | Regarding "Dropping lower-constraints.txt or not?", the discussion still cotninues in TC meeting. Feel free to add your opinions. | 15:54 |
| amotoki | Regarding "integration tests failure in master branch", let's contineu to investigate the cause :) | 15:55 |
| amotoki | I think we can move it to specific topics next week. | 15:55 |
| amotoki | s/it/them/ | 15:55 |
| e0ne | agreed | 15:56 |
| e0ne | thanks everybody for your contributions! see you next week | 15:56 |
| amotoki | o/ | 15:56 |
| tmazur | o/ | 15:57 |
| e0ne | #endmeeting | 16:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 16:00 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed Feb 24 16:00:42 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:00 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-02-24-15.00.html | 16:00 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-02-24-15.00.txt | 16:00 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-02-24-15.00.log.html | 16:00 |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:15 | |
| *** rosmaita has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:33 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC | 16:36 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:41 | |
| *** rdopiera has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
| *** derekh has quit IRC | 17:23 | |
| *** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:23 | |
| *** gshippey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:24 | |
| *** derekh has quit IRC | 17:26 | |
| *** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:26 | |
| *** derekh has quit IRC | 17:46 | |
| *** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:47 | |
| *** rratnaka has quit IRC | 17:48 | |
| *** Luzi has quit IRC | 17:56 | |
| *** derekh has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 19:10 | |
| *** miniroy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 19:12 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 19:15 | |
| *** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 19:52 | |
| *** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 20:20 | |
| *** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 20:33 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 20:34 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 20:34 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
| *** whoami-rajat has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:14 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:28 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:32 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:40 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 21:45 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:46 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 21:49 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 21:51 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:53 | |
| *** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:53 | |
| *** gshippey has quit IRC | 22:06 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:15 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 23:14 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:15 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 23:17 | |
| *** ajitha has quit IRC | 23:26 | |
| *** miniroy has quit IRC | 23:26 | |
| *** carloss has quit IRC | 23:31 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!