| *** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 00:07 | |
| *** whoami-rajat has quit IRC | 00:15 | |
| *** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 00:16 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 00:17 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 00:49 | |
| *** SotK has quit IRC | 00:58 | |
| *** SotK has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 00:58 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has quit IRC | 01:04 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 01:05 | |
| *** subbareddy has quit IRC | 01:08 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
| *** tmazur has quit IRC | 01:22 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 02:00 | |
| *** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 02:05 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 02:29 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
| *** gagehugo has quit IRC | 02:29 | |
| *** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 02:30 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 02:30 | |
| *** gagehugo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 02:33 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 02:44 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 02:46 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 02:50 | |
| *** jhouser has quit IRC | 02:52 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 03:16 | |
| *** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 03:37 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 04:17 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 04:17 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 04:22 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 04:23 | |
| *** dviroel has quit IRC | 04:55 | |
| *** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 04:58 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 05:27 | |
| *** ajitha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 05:48 | |
| *** miniroy has quit IRC | 05:48 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 06:06 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 06:41 | |
| *** bnemec has quit IRC | 06:41 | |
| *** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 06:49 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 07:37 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 07:44 | |
| *** browny has quit IRC | 08:24 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 08:34 | |
| *** smyers has quit IRC | 08:34 | |
| *** smyers has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 08:38 | |
| *** browny has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 08:42 | |
| *** rdopiera has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 09:26 | |
| *** gshippey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:15 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:22 | |
| *** carloss has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:49 | |
| *** dviroel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 11:05 | |
| *** zoharm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 11:11 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has quit IRC | 12:03 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:03 | |
| *** GirishChilukuri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:14 | |
| *** GirishChilukuri has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:15 | |
| *** sangeet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:21 | |
| *** sangeet has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:21 | |
| *** kinpaa12389 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:22 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:45 | |
| *** GirishChilukuri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:49 | |
| *** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:50 | |
| *** almir-okato has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:52 | |
| *** rosmaita has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:54 | |
| *** amar7ibm_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:58 | |
| rosmaita | #startmeeting cinder | 14:00 |
|---|---|---|
| openstack | Meeting started Wed Mar 3 14:00:40 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rosmaita. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:00 |
| tosky | o/ | 14:00 |
| enriquetaso | hi | 14:00 |
| geguileo | hi! o/ | 14:00 |
| rosmaita | #topic roll call | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:00 | |
| whoami-rajat | Hi | 14:00 |
| e0ne | hi | 14:00 |
| zoharm | o7 | 14:01 |
| kinpaa12389 | hi | 14:01 |
| eharney | hi | 14:01 |
| rosmaita | looks like a good turnout, let's get started | 14:01 |
| rosmaita | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-wallaby-meetings | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | #topic announcements | 14:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:02 | |
| rosmaita | wallaby os-brick release this week (that is, tomorrow) | 14:02 |
| *** thgcorrea has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:02 | |
| rosmaita | cinderclient release next week | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | wallaby feature freeze next week also | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | so, review priorities are: | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | today: os-brick | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | then, cinderclient and features | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | use launchpad to find features to review | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/wallaby | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | if you have a feature that's not in there, let me know immediately | 14:03 |
| *** sfernand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:04 | |
| rosmaita | note to driver developer/maintainers: even if you are not a core, you can review other people's drivers | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | we have helpful info in the cinder docs if you need suggestions on what to look for | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | though, you probably know since you are working on your own driver | 14:05 |
| jungleboyj | o/ | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | #topic wallaby os-brick release | 14:05 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "wallaby os-brick release (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:05 | |
| rosmaita | ok, some patches we need to get in (and that obviously need reviews) | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | fix nvmeof connector regression | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/777086 | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | it's got a -1 from me, but just for minor stuff ... it looks otherwise ok to me | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | it has passed zuul | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | and passed the mellanox SPDK CI, which consumes the connector in a "legacy" way | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | and it has passed the kioxia CI, which consumes the connector in the new way | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | anyway, that's the #1 priority because it corrects a regression | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | other stuff that is uncontroversial and needs review: | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | remove six - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/754598/ | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | the nvmeof change doesn't use six at all, so it's not impacted | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | but i seem to have been reviewing this patch for months and would likeit out of my life | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | change min version of tox - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/771568 | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | i verified that tox is smart enough to update itself when it builds testenvs, so it's not a problem | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | RBD: catch read exceptions prior to modifying offset | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/763867 | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | would be good, please look, if it requires work, give it a -1 | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | Avoid unhandled exceptions during connecting to iSCSI portals | 14:12 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/775545 | 14:12 |
| rosmaita | there's a question about ^^, namely whether it catches too broad an exception | 14:12 |
| *** felipe_rodrigues has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:13 | |
| rosmaita | so while it would be nice to have, i don't insist on it | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | so if you have a particular interest in this, please review | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | change hacking to 4.0.0 | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/774883 | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | so, we have already done it for cinder, and the one to cinderclient will probably merge before release | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | now that i think about it, we could always merge later and backport to stable/wallaby to keep the code consistent | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | so, let's hold off unless someone here has a strong opinion? | 14:15 |
| eharney | i think just updating to 4.0.0 is pretty easy? not sure what you mean | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | well, i don't know if it will impact any of the other patches | 14:16 |
| eharney | ah | 14:16 |
| rosmaita | i will rebase it after the critical stuff merges and we can see what happens | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | ok, i may put up a patch to update the requirements and lower-constraints | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | it may not be necessary because they were updated in january | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | anyway, if there is a change, i will individually bug people to look at the patch | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | ok, to summarize | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | the highest priority for brick is the nvmeof patch | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/777086 | 14:20 |
| rosmaita | need quick feedback on this issue: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/777086/8/os_brick/initiator/connectors/nvmeof.py#829 | 14:21 |
| rosmaita | ok, if memory serves, e0ne and hemna volunteered to review this? | 14:22 |
| e0ne | rosmaita: will do it. last time I +1'ed on it but there was an issue with naming | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | i am right on the verge of +2, but want to make sure we have people who can look at it today | 14:23 |
| jungleboyj | Definitely need hemna to look at it. | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | e0ne: cool, i think that has been addressed | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | i think hemna looked at an earlier version, so shouldn't be too bad to re-review | 14:24 |
| jungleboyj | ++ | 14:24 |
| rosmaita | he may be on the west coast this week, i will look for him later | 14:24 |
| rosmaita | #topic cinderclient | 14:25 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "cinderclient (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:25 | |
| hemna | I'll poke at it | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | hemna: ty! | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/python-cinderclient+branch:master+status:open | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | major things are to get the MV updated | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | there's a patch for 3.63 | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | there will be a patch for 3.64 | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | but the cinder-side code needs to merge first | 14:26 |
| *** miniroy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:26 | |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/python-cinderclient+branch:master+status:open | 14:27 |
| rosmaita | bad paste there, sorry | 14:27 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/771081 | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | ^^ is a wallaby feature so is a priority review ... also, it's nicely written and has good tests, and one +2 | 14:28 |
| * jungleboyj has so many tabs open. :-) | 14:28 | |
| rosmaita | :D | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | ok, i am still working on the v2 support removal patch for cinderclient | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | should have it ready in the next day or so | 14:29 |
| jungleboyj | ++ | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | so note to reviewers: there are a bunch of small patches for cinderclient, please address them | 14:30 |
| rosmaita | #topic Request from TC to investigate frequent Gate failures | 14:30 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Request from TC to investigate frequent Gate failures (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:30 | |
| rosmaita | jungleboyj: that's you | 14:30 |
| *** miniroy has quit IRC | 14:30 | |
| jungleboyj | Hello. :-) | 14:30 |
| jungleboyj | So, as many have hopefully seen, there has been an effort to make our gate jobs more efficient as we have fewer resources for running check/gate. | 14:31 |
| jungleboyj | There have also been issues with how long patches are taking to get through. | 14:31 |
| jungleboyj | Neutron, Nova, etc have made things more efficient. | 14:32 |
| jungleboyj | There is still need for improvement. | 14:32 |
| jungleboyj | Now they are looking at how often gate/check runs fail. | 14:32 |
| jungleboyj | #link https://termbin.com/4guht | 14:33 |
| tosky | interesting enough, the pastebin you linked refers to tempest-integrated-storage failures, I thought we had many more in the lvm-lio-barbican job | 14:33 |
| jungleboyj | dansmith: Had highlighted two examples above where he was seeing frequent failures for Cinder. | 14:33 |
| rosmaita | does dansmith have an elasticsearch query up for these? | 14:33 |
| eharney | the lio-barbican job is failing a lot, but i think it doesn't show up much where other projects would see it | 14:33 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: I don't think he had put that together yet. This was just a quick grab. | 14:34 |
| dansmith | nope, haven't done that yet | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | what eharney said | 14:34 |
| rosmaita | dansmith: if you have time, that would be great | 14:34 |
| tosky | we have kind of discussed a bit about those in the past, my feeling is that something weird happen on the limited environment | 14:34 |
| dansmith | definitely not barbican-related jobs that I've seen | 14:34 |
| tosky | and eharney has started a bit of investigation, I don't remember if there were any findings | 14:34 |
| eharney | tosky: i think there's actually a bug in the target code hitting the lio-barbican job but i guess the questions today are about other issues | 14:35 |
| rosmaita | i think if we can get an elasticsearch query up, that will make it easier to find fresh logs when someone has time to look | 14:35 |
| tosky | eharney: I see | 14:35 |
| jungleboyj | So, partially, this is a reminder to everyone that we should try to look at failures and not just blindly recheck. Second, as to see if anyone has been looking at failures. | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | the big lvm-lio-barbican job failures i have been seeing are related to backup tests and the test-boot-pattern tests | 14:36 |
| jungleboyj | eharney: It is more of a general call. Those were just examples. :-) | 14:36 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: Hasn't that been the case for like 3 years now? | 14:36 |
| tosky | (backup tests which were removed from the main gates because of the failing rates, probably resources ) | 14:36 |
| *** tmazur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:37 | |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: Do we have elasticsearch queries for those? | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | i don't think so | 14:38 |
| jungleboyj | So, that would probably be good to add. | 14:38 |
| rosmaita | someone could be a Hero of Cinder and put them together | 14:38 |
| jungleboyj | :-) | 14:38 |
| rosmaita | and put the links on the meeting etherpad | 14:38 |
| * jungleboyj looks at our bug here enriquetaso | 14:39 | |
| jungleboyj | *hero | 14:39 |
| enriquetaso | sure | 14:39 |
| rosmaita | maybe a driver maintainer who's waiting for reviews ? | 14:39 |
| enriquetaso | not really sure how but sure | 14:39 |
| *** jbernard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:39 | |
| jungleboyj | Add to our weekly bug review an eye on where our gate/check failures are at. | 14:40 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: That is a good idea too. | 14:40 |
| rosmaita | enriquetaso: you can look by hand, but i think the preferred method is to file a bug and checkout a repo and push a patch | 14:40 |
| rosmaita | makes it more stable | 14:40 |
| rosmaita | we can talk offline, i have notes somewhere | 14:41 |
| rosmaita | or maybe dansmith can volunteer to walk you through the process? | 14:41 |
| rosmaita | ok, so the conclusion is that volume-related gate failures suck and someone needs to do something about it | 14:42 |
| dansmith | tbh, I haven't actually done that in a while | 14:42 |
| rosmaita | #topic Wallaby R-6 Bug Review | 14:42 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Wallaby R-6 Bug Review (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:42 | |
| enriquetaso | hi | 14:42 |
| enriquetaso | We have 6 bugs reported this week. I'd like to show 3 today because I'm not sure about the severity of them. | 14:42 |
| rosmaita | dansmith: that's fine, just may slow things down a bit, as you can see enriquetaso is already kind of busy | 14:42 |
| enriquetaso | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-wallaby-r6-bug-review | 14:43 |
| enriquetaso | bug_1: | 14:43 |
| enriquetaso | Backup create failed: RBD volume flatten too long causing mq to timed out. | 14:43 |
| jungleboyj | rosmaita: ++ Thank you. | 14:43 |
| enriquetaso | #link | 14:43 |
| enriquetaso | https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1916843 | 14:43 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1916843 in Cinder "Backup create failed: RBD volume flatten too long causing mq to timed out." [Medium,New] | 14:43 |
| enriquetaso | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1916843 | 14:43 |
| enriquetaso | In the process of creating a backup using a snapshot, there is an operation tocreate a temporary volume from a snapshot, which requires cinder-backupand cinder-volume to perform rpc interaction.default configuration"rpc_response_timeout" is 60s. | 14:43 |
| enriquetaso | whoami-rajat: is this related to any of the flatten work you have done? | 14:44 |
| enriquetaso | i can't remember | 14:44 |
| whoami-rajat | can't recall anything related, will take a thorough look after the meeting | 14:45 |
| enriquetaso | Thanks! | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | i think we should ask for more info first | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | something about the environment | 14:45 |
| eharney | the main point in that bug is that the slow call shouldn't block the service up for RPC calls, AFAIK | 14:45 |
| eharney | the fact that it's slow isn't really the interesting part | 14:45 |
| rosmaita | yeah, but sounds like we would need a major redesign to do that right | 14:46 |
| eharney | i'm not so sure, need to look around in that area again | 14:46 |
| dansmith | is it just that the operation takes longer than the RPC timeout? | 14:47 |
| dansmith | like, works for small volumes but large one will always take longer than 60s and the RPC call times out? | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | not sure, doesn't say | 14:47 |
| *** zoharm has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
| eharney | i'm thinking more in the direction of librbd not behaving the way most code does with eventlet | 14:48 |
| dansmith | we had a lot of those sorts of things in nova, so I implemented heartbeating long-call support in oslo.messaging a while back which lets you make much longer RPC calls | 14:48 |
| eharney | but i don't have enough to make it a useful discussion for now | 14:48 |
| dansmith | okay if you're blocked in a C lib call and not answering RPC, that would also be bad | 14:48 |
| eharney | right | 14:48 |
| enriquetaso | OK looks like there may be something there | 14:49 |
| enriquetaso | next | 14:49 |
| enriquetaso | bug_2: Cinder sends old db object when delete a attachment | 14:49 |
| enriquetaso | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1916980 | 14:49 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1916980 in Cinder "cinder sends old db object when delete a attachment" [Undecided,Incomplete] - Assigned to wu.chunyang (wuchunyang) | 14:49 |
| enriquetaso | When we delete an attachment Cinder sends a notification with old db object. We should call refresh() function to refresh the object before sending tonotification. after running the refresh function. the status changes todetached. | 14:50 |
| enriquetaso | I left a comment on the bug report "Does this problem occur on all backends or on a specific one?" | 14:50 |
| geguileo | enriquetaso: I have fixed that one in my local repo | 14:50 |
| geguileo | enriquetaso: I will submit the patch later today | 14:50 |
| enriquetaso | cool | 14:50 |
| enriquetaso | thanks! | 14:50 |
| enriquetaso | next | 14:50 |
| enriquetaso | bug_3: Scheduling is not even among multiple thin provisioning pools which have different sizes | 14:50 |
| enriquetaso | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1917293 | 14:50 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1917293 in Cinder "Scheduling is not even among multiple thin provisioning pools which have different sizes" [Undecided,New] | 14:50 |
| enriquetaso | Scheduling is not even among multiple thin provisioning pools | 14:51 |
| enriquetaso | which have different sizes. For example, there are two thin provisioning | 14:51 |
| enriquetaso | pools. Pool0 has 10T capacity, Pool1 has 30T capacity, the max_over_subscription_ratio | 14:51 |
| enriquetaso | of them are both 20. We assume that the provisioned_capacity_gb of Pool1 | 14:51 |
| enriquetaso | is 250T and the provisioned_capacity_gb of Pool0 is 0. | 14:51 |
| enriquetaso | According to the formula in the cinder source code, the free capacity of Pool0 | 14:51 |
| enriquetaso | is 10*20-0=200T and the free capacity of Pool1 is 30*20-250=350T. | 14:51 |
| enriquetaso | So it is clear for us to see that a new created volume is | 14:51 |
| enriquetaso | scheduled to Pool1 instead of Pool0. However, Pool0 is scheduled | 14:51 |
| enriquetaso | since it has bigger real capacity. | 14:51 |
| enriquetaso | In a word, the scheduler tends to schedule the pool that has bigger size. | 14:51 |
| geguileo | enriquetaso: I haven't looked at the bug, but where they testing on devstack or with a deployment that has 3 schedulers? | 14:51 |
| eharney | i'd need to look into this one again, but i'm not sure it's a bug, it may be that the reporter's expectations aren't quite right and he's expecting a scheduling algorithm that's smarter than what we actually try to do | 14:52 |
| geguileo | or that the requests are going to different schedulers | 14:52 |
| geguileo | and each scheduler has a different in-memory data at the time of receiving the request... | 14:52 |
| enriquetaso | geguileo, i need to ask because it doesn't says | 14:52 |
| geguileo | enriquetaso: anything that happens with multiple schedulers but doesn't with a single one can be attributed to different in-memory data | 14:53 |
| enriquetaso | geguileo, good point, so we need more info | 14:54 |
| eharney | this will also depend on how you configure the capacity weigher | 14:54 |
| enriquetaso | OK | 14:55 |
| enriquetaso | that's the last one :) | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | thanks sofia | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | #topic stable branch update | 14:55 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "stable branch update (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:56 | |
| whoami-rajat | i will provide a quick update | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | proposed stable victoria release | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778231 | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | 3 patches remaining in ussuri (cinder and os-brick) | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | 4 remaining in train | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | thanks everyone for the reviews this week | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | that's all from my side | 14:57 |
| *** zoharm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:57 | |
| rosmaita | thanks Rajat | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | #topic conf option workaround | 14:57 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "conf option workaround (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:57 | |
| whoami-rajat | Again me | 14:57 |
| whoami-rajat | so hemna asked a question about the default value of the conf option in rbd clone patch | 14:58 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/754397 | 14:58 |
| eharney | IIRC, this is defaulted off mostly because we don't want to introduce extra risk and complexity, right? | 14:59 |
| whoami-rajat | yes | 14:59 |
| eharney | that's not really obvious in the patch, but that plus the fact that there are other solutions for people now makes a decent case for defaulting it off i think | 14:59 |
| rosmaita | ok, we are out of time ... let's continue this in openstack-cinder, or respond on the patch | 14:59 |
| rosmaita | thanks everyone | 14:59 |
| rosmaita | #endmeeting | 15:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 15:00 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed Mar 3 15:00:02 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:00 |
| whoami-rajat | this isn't even the actual feature, just a workaround for releases < mimic | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2021/cinder.2021-03-03-14.00.html | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2021/cinder.2021-03-03-14.00.txt | 15:00 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2021/cinder.2021-03-03-14.00.log.html | 15:00 |
| jungleboyj | Thanks! | 15:00 |
| e0ne | #startmeeting horizon | 15:01 |
| openstack | Meeting started Wed Mar 3 15:01:26 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is e0ne. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:01 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:01 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'horizon' | 15:01 |
| *** GirishChilukuri has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:02 | |
| *** amar7ibm_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:02 | |
| vishalmanchanda | hi all | 15:02 |
| e0ne | hi | 15:02 |
| rdopiera | o/ | 15:02 |
| tmazur | o/ | 15:02 |
| *** kinpaa12389 has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
| amotoki | o/ | 15:03 |
| e0ne | #topic Notices | 15:05 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Notices (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:05 | |
| *** jbernard has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:05 | |
| e0ne | TC Nominations and PTL Nominations for Xena release started | 15:05 |
| e0ne | #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/ | 15:06 |
| e0ne | do not forget to add you candidacy if you're going to | 15:06 |
| e0ne | I'm not going to serve PTL role for one more cycle | 15:07 |
| e0ne | I'll still be in the community but my priorities changed | 15:08 |
| *** ikanias has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:09 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 15:09 | |
| e0ne | next week is Wallaby-3 milestone | 15:10 |
| e0ne | #link https://releases.openstack.org/wallaby/schedule.html | 15:10 |
| amotoki | perhaps my pririties needs to be changed too :( | 15:11 |
| e0ne | it's a feature freeze and soft string freeze too | 15:11 |
| e0ne | amotoki: are you leaving openstack community? | 15:11 |
| amotoki | e0ne: no | 15:11 |
| e0ne | amotoki: good to hear it | 15:11 |
| amotoki | regarding milestone 3, let's check our priorities | 15:12 |
| amotoki | re: policy stuff, is there any blocker? | 15:12 |
| amotoki | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/750134 | 15:12 |
| e0ne | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-release-priorities | 15:13 |
| amotoki | we haven't supported system-scope but at least support of deprecation rules would be a good improvement | 15:13 |
| e0ne | amotoki: I put +2 without W+1 on it to let people more time to test and review it | 15:14 |
| amotoki | so that we can sync default policies from backend services. | 15:14 |
| e0ne | I don't have any blockers to get it merged | 15:14 |
| amotoki | once it lands, we also need to sync polices as follow-up | 15:14 |
| e0ne | let's give rdopiera and tmazur some time to review it | 15:15 |
| amotoki | +1 | 15:15 |
| vishalmanchanda | +1. | 15:15 |
| *** jinyuanliu has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
| e0ne | otherwise I'll merge it tonight | 15:16 |
| *** jinyuanliu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:16 | |
| tmazur | thanks! I had no time to test it properly yet, will do today | 15:16 |
| e0ne | tmazur: thanks | 15:16 |
| amotoki | regardless of that you can review in time or not, I can help your understanding on policies. | 15:17 |
| amotoki | we have two more prioritied topics. | 15:17 |
| vishalmanchanda | I have a question if policy rules change for a service like if there are some change in rule for cinder then we are going to update it every time? | 15:18 |
| amotoki | the one is "Merge tempest-horizon into tempest" | 15:18 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: what do you mean by "every time"? | 15:18 |
| vishalmanchanda | amotoki: sorry to interrupt please go ahead. | 15:18 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: go ahead, you first | 15:18 |
| amotoki | it is better to cover it before moving on | 15:19 |
| vishalmanchanda | amotoki: I mean if there are new rules added in cinder.yaml then we are going to add it horizon as well? | 15:19 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: my current answer is that (1) we need to follow policy NAME change at least and (2) sync the latest rules as much as possible per release. | 15:20 |
| vishalmanchanda | amotoki: ok got my answer thanks. | 15:20 |
| gmann | policy changes should happen in deprecated way with supporting old rules. | 15:21 |
| gmann | if any service break existing horizon then it break users :) | 15:21 |
| amotoki | gmann: yeah | 15:22 |
| amotoki | at least horizon default policies are behind a couple of releases | 15:22 |
| amotoki | as we did not support deprecated rules and could not update policy.json files for several releases | 15:22 |
| amotoki | so we need to close the gap at least in this release. | 15:23 |
| gmann | +1 | 15:23 |
| amotoki | this is the top priority to me in this release. | 15:23 |
| amotoki | more questions on the policy stuff? | 15:24 |
| vishalmanchanda | nothing | 15:25 |
| amotoki | okay, let's cover the other two priorites | 15:25 |
| -amotoki- thinks we can cover prioritised topics in "Notices" section | 15:26 | |
| amotoki | the one is "Merge tempest-horizon into tempest". | 15:26 |
| amotoki | this is almost completed. the remaining one is to update queens and rokcy update. | 15:26 |
| amotoki | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22merge-horizon-test%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 15:26 |
| e0ne | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22merge-horizon-test%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 15:26 |
| amotoki | so it would be simple. on the other hand, I am not sure who are interested in these stabe branches..... | 15:27 |
| amotoki | this would be another discussion on when we should EOL old stable branches, so I don't jump into details. | 15:28 |
| amotoki | gmann: I think we can ignore https://review.opendev.org/c/vexxhost/openstack-operator/+/774720 as we got no response so far unfortunately. | 15:29 |
| gmann | amotoki: yeah, there are failing with cirror url so once they fix that they can merge this to get their gate green | 15:30 |
| amotoki | gmann: yes. it totally depends on the healthiness of their CI :) | 15:31 |
| amotoki | moving on | 15:31 |
| amotoki | the other is "Chinese locale rename". | 15:31 |
| amotoki | I got a great progress today. | 15:31 |
| gmann | as it is outside of openstack governance I think proposing change is all we can do | 15:31 |
| amotoki | gmann: totally agree (as we discussed in the reviews in project-config and governances) | 15:32 |
| amotoki | back to "Chinese locale rename ", the change in openstack-zuul-jobs landed today | 15:32 |
| amotoki | and you see zh-cn/zh-tw are renamed in recent translation import patches. | 15:33 |
| amotoki | I am carefully reviewing the periodic job results in all projects. | 15:33 |
| amotoki | big thanks to the TaCT and I18N SIG members. | 15:33 |
| vishalmanchanda | yes I see bot patches in horizon | 15:33 |
| vishalmanchanda | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/778366 | 15:34 |
| amotoki | they are my other hats too :) | 15:34 |
| amotoki | more specifically, https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522zanata/translations%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+(project:%255Eopenstack/.*horizon+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/.*-ui+OR+project:%255Eopenstack/.*-dashboard) | 15:34 |
| amotoki | and https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=propose-translation-update | 15:35 |
| vishalmanchanda | amotoki: nice work:) | 15:35 |
| e0ne | glad to see plugins CIs in a good shapte | 15:35 |
| amotoki | more, we need to land https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/774034 in horizon | 15:35 |
| amotoki | it is mandatory to consume the new locales. | 15:36 |
| amotoki | if you notice any issues or questions feel free to reach me. | 15:37 |
| amotoki | e0ne: rdopiera: could you review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/774034 for smooth transiation? | 15:38 |
| e0ne | +2'ed | 15:38 |
| *** hemna has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
| amotoki | that's all from me | 15:39 |
| *** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 15:40 | |
| amotoki | anything other on priorities? | 15:40 |
| e0ne | nothing from me | 15:42 |
| vishalmanchanda | I also want to admin-backup-panel feature to get merged in this release. | 15:42 |
| vishalmanchanda | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/772603 | 15:42 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: is it a part of priorities? | 15:42 |
| amotoki | if it is a general review request we can cover it later. | 15:43 |
| vishalmanchanda | ok | 15:43 |
| amotoki | this is "Notices" topic in the meeting. | 15:43 |
| vishalmanchanda | oops. | 15:44 |
| amotoki | my turn on the priorites is over :) let's move on | 15:44 |
| e0ne | #topic Open discussion | 15:45 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:45 | |
| e0ne | vishalmanchanda: I'll review your patch. it's good to be included in the release | 15:46 |
| vishalmanchanda | e0ne: thanks Ivan:) | 15:46 |
| vishalmanchanda | no topic from my side. | 15:48 |
| amotoki | I revisited 30~40 bugs last week. I noticed most incoming bugs are not reviewed unless I reviews. I don't want to be alone and being alone discourages me a lot :( | 15:48 |
| amotoki | 30~40 bugs are old bugs though | 15:48 |
| amotoki | I suggest you to review bugs :) | 15:49 |
| vishalmanchanda | will do that I was on PTO last week due to some travelling. | 15:49 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: np.. | 15:50 |
| amotoki | I am talking about general situations in recent cycles. one or two weeks does not matter. | 15:51 |
| e0ne | I skipped bug triage during last month :( | 15:51 |
| amotoki | I am trying to be a noisy man as I will descrease my priority in the next cycle and am flushing pending items. | 15:52 |
| e0ne | amotoki: it's ok | 15:53 |
| e0ne | it's an important topic | 15:53 |
| *** zoharm has quit IRC | 15:55 | |
| amotoki | I think bugs highlight our feature gaps well | 15:55 |
| amotoki | e0ne: one question. I see some security bugs assigned to you. are you still working on them? | 15:56 |
| e0ne | amotoki: oh.. let me check it. I tottally forgot about it:( | 15:57 |
| amotoki | e0ne: thanks | 15:57 |
| e0ne | amotoki: could you send me a link? I don't see any security issues assigned to me | 15:58 |
| e0ne | only this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1892848 | 15:58 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1892848 in OpenStack Security Advisory "XSS in adding JavaScript into the ‘Subnet Name’ field" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 15:58 |
| amotoki | e0ne: let me share them later. I donn't have the links now. | 15:58 |
| amotoki | e0ne: I am not sure it was "one or more" though | 15:59 |
| e0ne | we're out of time. let's continue our discussion in #openstack-horizon channel | 16:00 |
| amotoki | generally speaking we need to review such bugs http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-February/020577.html | 16:00 |
| amotoki | thanks all | 16:00 |
| e0ne | thanks everybody for your contributions | 16:02 |
| e0ne | #endmeeting | 16:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 16:02 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed Mar 3 16:02:16 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:02 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-03-03-15.01.html | 16:02 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-03-03-15.01.txt | 16:02 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-03-03-15.01.log.html | 16:02 |
| *** smcginnis has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:25 | |
| *** smcginnis has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:34 | |
| *** rosmaita has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:35 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:37 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 16:46 | |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:47 | |
| *** hemna has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** browny has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** lifeless_ has quit IRC | 17:01 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:05 | |
| *** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:06 | |
| *** browny has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:06 | |
| *** lifeless_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:06 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:13 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:26 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
| *** subbareddy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:27 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:43 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:43 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:59 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 18:23 | |
| *** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 18:38 | |
| *** lpetrut has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
| *** rdopiera has quit IRC | 19:25 | |
| *** whoami-rajat has quit IRC | 19:50 | |
| *** lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | 19:56 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 20:46 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 20:57 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:01 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
| *** irclogbot_1 has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
| *** bauzas has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
| *** ianw has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
| *** kopecmartin has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
| *** DinaBelova has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
| *** freerunner has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
| *** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
| *** irclogbot_1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:34 | |
| *** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:34 | |
| *** ianw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:34 | |
| *** kopecmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:34 | |
| *** DinaBelova has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:34 | |
| *** freerunner has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:34 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:34 | |
| *** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:34 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:38 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 21:44 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:45 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:05 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:11 | |
| *** ajitha has quit IRC | 22:23 | |
| *** gshippey has quit IRC | 22:25 | |
| *** smekala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:29 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 22:42 | |
| *** smekala has quit IRC | 22:55 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 22:56 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:01 | |
| *** thgcorrea has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 23:26 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 23:40 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:42 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC | 23:44 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!