| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 00:10 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has quit IRC | 01:05 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 01:05 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 01:05 | |
| *** tmazur has quit IRC | 01:21 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 01:28 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 01:46 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 01:50 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 02:00 | |
| *** reddy has quit IRC | 02:16 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 02:26 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 02:27 | |
| *** carloss has quit IRC | 02:30 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 03:05 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 03:16 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 03:25 | |
| *** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 03:26 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 04:51 | |
| *** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 06:11 | |
| *** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 06:18 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 06:26 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 06:32 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 07:07 | |
| *** sangeet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 07:17 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 07:21 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 07:25 | |
| *** rdopiera has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 07:30 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 07:30 | |
| *** LinPeiWen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 07:57 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 07:59 | |
| *** ianychoi_ has quit IRC | 08:13 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 08:23 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 08:29 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 08:38 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 08:42 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 08:46 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 09:30 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 09:54 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 10:05 | |
| *** LinPeiWen has quit IRC | 10:20 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 10:38 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:38 | |
| *** carloss has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:41 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 10:42 | |
| *** tosky_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:45 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 10:47 | |
| *** tosky_ is now known as tosky | 10:49 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 10:52 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 10:58 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 11:02 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 11:06 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 11:24 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 11:28 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 11:45 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 11:55 | |
| *** Luzi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:00 | |
| *** dviroel is now known as dviroel|nho | 12:01 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has quit IRC | 12:03 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:03 | |
| *** sangeet has quit IRC | 12:10 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:16 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:18 | |
| *** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:22 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 12:23 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 12:31 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:33 | |
| *** eharney has quit IRC | 12:37 | |
| *** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:52 | |
| *** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 12:52 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has quit IRC | 13:05 | |
| *** jinyuanliu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:05 | |
| *** rdopiera has quit IRC | 13:28 | |
| *** rdopiera has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:28 | |
| *** tmazur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:28 | |
| *** miniroy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:33 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
| *** reddy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:48 | |
| *** rosmaita has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:51 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 13:52 | |
| *** Luzi has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
| rosmaita | #startmeeting cinder | 14:00 |
|---|---|---|
| openstack | Meeting started Wed May 5 14:00:06 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is rosmaita. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:00 |
| rosmaita | #topic roll call | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:00 | |
| eharney | hi | 14:00 |
| tosky | hi (around a bit, I may have to drop) | 14:00 |
| whoami-rajat | Hi | 14:01 |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:02 | |
| jungleboyj | Hello. | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | hello everyone | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-xena-meetings | 14:02 |
| walshh_ | hi | 14:02 |
| rosmaita | #topic announcements | 14:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:02 | |
| rosmaita | i posted a summary of our discussions at the PTG | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderXenaPTGSummary | 14:03 |
| jungleboyj | 👍 | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | you should take a look at your discussion and check it for accuracy | 14:03 |
| enriquetaso | hi | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | it's a wiki, so you should be able to make correctinos | 14:03 |
| rosmaita | (that's a typo, i'm not trying to be cute) | 14:03 |
| enriquetaso | :P | 14:04 |
| jungleboyj | LOL | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | i was a bit consistent about using irc nicks and real first names throughout the doc | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | one thing i do want to point out are the cycle priorities | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderXenaPTGSummary#Xena_Cycle_Priorities | 14:04 |
| rosmaita | there are some priorities addressing stability that don't really have a deadline | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | and those tend to get lost | 14:05 |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:05 | |
| rosmaita | but they can be done in small pieces | 14:05 |
| rosmaita | what i'd like you to do is to use the gerrit topic listed so we can keep visibility on them | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | that is, so you can get quick review of your patches | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | that's all from me, anyone else have an announcement? | 14:07 |
| rosmaita | guess not | 14:08 |
| rosmaita | #topic midcycle meeting times | 14:08 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "midcycle meeting times (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:08 | |
| *** LinPeiWen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:08 | |
| rosmaita | last week i asked you to check on whether the dates are ok | 14:08 |
| rosmaita | i haven't heard anything | 14:09 |
| jungleboyj | Oops. :-( | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | so i am assuming that wednesday 2 june and wednesday 4 august are unobjectionable? | 14:09 |
| enriquetaso | sorry about that.. | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | well, it won't hurt to wait one more week to schedule these | 14:09 |
| rosmaita | so | 14:09 |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 14:09 | |
| jungleboyj | At the usual cinder meeting time plus an hour? | 14:10 |
| whoami-rajat | the timing and dates work for me | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | or minus an hour | 14:10 |
| whoami-rajat | rosmaita: was there a poll for this? | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | no we were going to vote in the meeting | 14:10 |
| jungleboyj | Yeah. That is as good a time as any for me. | 14:10 |
| rosmaita | that is, this meeting | 14:10 |
| whoami-rajat | ok cool | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | so, to summarize, the midcycle will be on a wednesday and will overlap with the normal cinder meeting time | 14:11 |
| rosmaita | so the only question is whether people are planning to be on vacation those weeks, or if there is a major opensource/python event those weeks | 14:12 |
| rosmaita | i don't know of any major events | 14:12 |
| rosmaita | so my question right now is, are people ready to vote to pick the times for those days? | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | maybe we need to vote on that! | 14:13 |
| rosmaita | Are you ready to vote on the time for the midcycles today? | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | #startvote yes, no | 14:14 |
| openstack | Unable to parse vote topic and options. | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | :D | 14:14 |
| rosmaita | #startvote Are you ready to vote on the time for the midcycles today? yes, no | 14:15 |
| openstack | Begin voting on: Are you ready to vote on the time for the midcycles today? Valid vote options are yes, no. | 14:15 |
| openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | #vote yes | 14:15 |
| whoami-rajat | #vote yes | 14:15 |
| enriquetaso | #vote yes | 14:15 |
| eharney | #vote maybe | 14:15 |
| openstack | eharney: maybe is not a valid option. Valid options are yes, no. | 14:15 |
| eharney | #vote yes | 14:15 |
| walshh_ | #vote yes | 14:15 |
| jungleboyj | #vote yes | 14:15 |
| rosmaita | i thought i was committed to democracy, so it's kind of disconcerting to see that i don't know how to use the voting feature of the meetbot | 14:16 |
| jungleboyj | #fail | 14:16 |
| jungleboyj | ;-) | 14:16 |
| rosmaita | that seems to be everyone, will close the vote in 20 seconds | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | #endvote | 14:17 |
| openstack | Voted on "Are you ready to vote on the time for the midcycles today?" Results are | 14:17 |
| openstack | yes (6): enriquetaso, walshh_, whoami-rajat, jungleboyj, rosmaita, eharney | 14:17 |
| rosmaita | ok, guess we are ready | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | the R-18 midcycle will be held on Wednesday 2 June 2021 | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | we need to pick a time | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | options are: | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | A 1300-1500 UTC | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | B 1400-1600 UTC | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | C need more options | 14:18 |
| rosmaita | #startvote time for the 2 June midcycle? A, B, C | 14:18 |
| openstack | Begin voting on: time for the 2 June midcycle? Valid vote options are A, B, C. | 14:18 |
| openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 14:18 |
| jungleboyj | #vote B | 14:19 |
| whoami-rajat | #vote A, B | 14:19 |
| openstack | whoami-rajat: A, B is not a valid option. Valid options are A, B, C. | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | #vote B | 14:19 |
| whoami-rajat | #vote A | 14:19 |
| walshh_ | #vote B | 14:19 |
| eharney | #vote B | 14:19 |
| enriquetaso | #vote B | 14:20 |
| rosmaita | i think that's everyone ... will wait 20 sec | 14:21 |
| tosky | (I always vote "it will conflict with something anyway") | 14:21 |
| rosmaita | #endvote | 14:22 |
| openstack | Voted on "time for the 2 June midcycle?" Results are | 14:22 |
| openstack | A (1): whoami-rajat | 14:22 |
| openstack | B (5): jungleboyj, enriquetaso, eharney, rosmaita, walshh_ | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | ok 1400-1600 it is | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | next one | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | the R-9 midcycle will be held on Wednesday 4 August 2021 | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | let's pick a time | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | options are: | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | A 1300-1500 UTC | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | B 1400-1600 UTC | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | C either one of the above | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | D need more options | 14:22 |
| rosmaita | #startvote time for the 4 August midcycle? A, B, C, D | 14:22 |
| openstack | Begin voting on: time for the 4 August midcycle? Valid vote options are A, B, C, D. | 14:22 |
| openstack | Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. | 14:22 |
| eharney | #vote C | 14:23 |
| tosky | #vote C | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | #vote C | 14:23 |
| jungleboyj | #vote B | 14:23 |
| whoami-rajat | #vote C | 14:23 |
| enriquetaso | #vote C | 14:23 |
| walshh_ | #vote C | 14:23 |
| rosmaita | i think that's everyone .... will close the vote in 20 sec | 14:24 |
| rosmaita | #endvote | 14:25 |
| openstack | Voted on "time for the 4 August midcycle?" Results are | 14:25 |
| openstack | C (6): tosky, eharney, walshh_, whoami-rajat, rosmaita, enriquetaso | 14:25 |
| openstack | B (1): jungleboyj | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | OK, that makes 1400-1600 the winner | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | ok, thanks everyone, i will send out an email for the benefit of people who weren't here | 14:25 |
| rosmaita | #action rosmaita announce midcycle date/times | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | #topic final train release status | 14:26 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "final train release status (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:26 | |
| rosmaita | whoami-rajat: you have the floor | 14:26 |
| rosmaita | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/train-final-release | 14:26 |
| whoami-rajat | So rosmaita updated the tracker with patches to be included in final train release (thanks!) | 14:27 |
| whoami-rajat | We currently only have open patches in cinder train | 14:27 |
| whoami-rajat | os-brick patches merged | 14:27 |
| whoami-rajat | and other branch doesn't have new patches, we did a release recently so no need to release them this time | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | someone (tosky?) put a question about the stabilization fix | 14:28 |
| rosmaita | that is, backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/785970 to train | 14:28 |
| eharney | we should do that, i'll propose it | 14:28 |
| whoami-rajat | rosmaita: there's one patch from SVF failing because of other patch dependency, I've backported the other one so we can review it and fix the gate on first one? | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | i have no objection | 14:29 |
| whoami-rajat | sounds good | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | whoami-rajat: sure, i was hoping that the SVF team would do it | 14:29 |
| rosmaita | my "no objection" was in response to eharney | 14:29 |
| whoami-rajat | rosmaita: they haven't responded to my comment since a long time so i wasn't sure they're going to do it | 14:30 |
| tosky | that was me, yes, thanks | 14:30 |
| rosmaita | whoami-rajat: i agree about your proposal, though, it is probably better to have both fixes together | 14:30 |
| tosky | do we have any contact for that team? Maybe a direct email? | 14:31 |
| rosmaita | well, they are usually making pests of themselves asking for reviews :P | 14:31 |
| whoami-rajat | rosmaita: i didn't understand, the second one needs to be merged to pass gate on first one? then we can merge first one | 14:31 |
| rosmaita | so i'm kind of surprised that they've gone silent | 14:31 |
| *** ikanias has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:31 | |
| rosmaita | whoami-rajat: i meant it is better to have both those fixes in train | 14:32 |
| whoami-rajat | rosmaita: yes, agree | 14:32 |
| rosmaita | so what you said .... we merge the patch you just proposed first, which will allow us to rebase the current failing patch | 14:33 |
| whoami-rajat | yes | 14:33 |
| whoami-rajat | atleast that's what we did in other branches | 14:33 |
| eharney | IMO we should also get https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/783204 in which is currently languishing on stable/ussuri review | 14:34 |
| *** sangeet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:34 | |
| *** sangeet has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:34 | |
| jungleboyj | eharney: ++ Have a few things languishing. | 14:34 |
| whoami-rajat | can anyone propose the backports (or i can do) and we can add them to the etherpad | 14:35 |
| eharney | i'll propose that one | 14:35 |
| whoami-rajat | ok thanks | 14:35 |
| rosmaita | ok, i just approved https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/783204 | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | i think it makes sense to get it into train, too | 14:36 |
| rosmaita | anything else anyone is aware of? | 14:37 |
| whoami-rajat | that's all from me | 14:37 |
| rosmaita | ok, thanks | 14:38 |
| rosmaita | tosky: are you available now? | 14:38 |
| enriquetaso | should we backport to train this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/785223 too? | 14:39 |
| tosky | rosmaita: zep | 14:39 |
| eharney | enriquetaso: we could, but i don't know that it's too crucial since it seems to mostly only hit CI jobs and not users | 14:40 |
| rosmaita | just moved you up in the agenda | 14:40 |
| enriquetaso | sure, thanks | 14:40 |
| whoami-rajat | eharney: but we've faced consistent lvm-lio job failures on train gate before | 14:41 |
| tosky | whoami-rajat: iirc that fix is for the LVM version in focal, which is only supported in victoria and newer releases | 14:41 |
| eharney | will there still be lvm-lio train jobs..? | 14:41 |
| tosky | until we support train, yes (but based on bionic) | 14:42 |
| enriquetaso | ++ | 14:42 |
| tosky | stein, train and ussuri (maybe also rocky, don't remember) are bionic | 14:42 |
| eharney | ok, well, i'm not opposed to backporting it, for sure | 14:42 |
| rosmaita | ok, we can always backport it later if necessary, doesn't really affect the release | 14:43 |
| rosmaita | (unless we're seeing gate failures that prevent other stuff from merging) | 14:43 |
| rosmaita | #topic some gate-related issues | 14:43 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "some gate-related issues (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:43 | |
| tosky | very quick, two fixes for jobs: | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/789717 | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | i think that one looks fine | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/786755 | 14:44 |
| rosmaita | i wasn't sure where to see this one is affecting stein? | 14:45 |
| tosky | iirc because we haven't submitted new stein patch recently | 14:45 |
| *** LinPeiWen has quit IRC | 14:46 | |
| tosky | I've noticed while working on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/786737 (which is worth considering too, low prio as it's stein) | 14:46 |
| tosky | the first revision of the patch failed because of that; the current revision works because it depends on the cinder-tempest-plugin fix | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | ok, i was looking at a brick patch, not cinder | 14:47 |
| rosmaita | all stable cores: give ^^ some attention | 14:48 |
| rosmaita | thanks, Luigi | 14:48 |
| rosmaita | #topic interop guidelines review | 14:48 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "interop guidelines review (Meeting topic: cinder)" | 14:48 | |
| rosmaita | hopefully we can get through this really quick | 14:48 |
| rosmaita | this is what we are talking about: | 14:49 |
| rosmaita | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderXenaPTGSummary#The_Interoperability_Working_Group | 14:49 |
| rosmaita | "Cinder team: will review mv changes between 3.0 and 3.64 to see if any "advisory" tests should be added" | 14:49 |
| rosmaita | just so you know where to look | 14:49 |
| rosmaita | this is the next set of capabilities: | 14:49 |
| rosmaita | #link https://opendev.org/osf/interop/src/branch/master/next.json#L151-L163 | 14:50 |
| whoami-rajat | rosmaita: IIRC these are only related to third party CI ? | 14:50 |
| rosmaita | no, kind of a separate issue | 14:50 |
| rosmaita | this is the specification of what we think must be included for a cloud to be running OpenStack | 14:50 |
| tosky | whoami-rajat: guidelines/testing for interoperability of (vendored) openstack implementation | 14:50 |
| rosmaita | we also get indirectly included in this nova capability: | 14:51 |
| whoami-rajat | ok | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | #link https://opendev.org/osf/interop/src/branch/master/next.json#L133 | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | and here's where you can see what that capability "means", in terms of what tempest tests it matches to: | 14:51 |
| rosmaita | #link https://opendev.org/osf/interop/src/branch/master/next.json#L1103-L1130 | 14:52 |
| rosmaita | the volumes-* capability definitions start here (and go on and on): | 14:52 |
| eharney | i'm curious to know what tests exist for "volumes-v3-readonly" | 14:52 |
| rosmaita | #link https://opendev.org/osf/interop/src/branch/master/next.json#L2378 | 14:52 |
| eharney | ah, https://opendev.org/osf/interop/src/branch/master/next.json#L2830 | 14:53 |
| eharney | yeah that test doesn't validate that readonly actually works | 14:53 |
| rosmaita | yeah, these will only be API tests | 14:54 |
| rosmaita | by the way, that stuff you can't read in the description of all these tests says: | 14:54 |
| rosmaita | "This is being added as advisory to highlight the transitition from v2 to v3." | 14:54 |
| rosmaita | i will put up a patch to remove that sentence | 14:54 |
| rosmaita | #action rosmaita interop patch removing transition v2->v3 language | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | ok, so i looked over our microversions | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | #link https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/contributor/api_microversion_history.html | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | i only found two candidates | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | well, actually 3 | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | mv 3.3, User Messages | 14:55 |
| rosmaita | i forgot to check whether there are existing tempest tests for ^^ | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | because if they aren't we will need to write them | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | the second is mv 5.55, 3.57, "New Transfer API" | 14:56 |
| eharney | i don't recall any user message tests existing | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | from the quick find, i can't find anything saying message there | 14:56 |
| rosmaita | use /volume-transfers instead of /os-volume-transfer in the URL | 14:56 |
| *** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 14:57 | |
| rosmaita | i started looking into this one, but got lost in the tempest clients and couldn't figure out whether they are using the os- version or not when making the calls | 14:57 |
| rosmaita | because transfers actually are tested | 14:57 |
| tosky | the tests can set the specific microversion used by the tempest client (if that's the question) | 14:58 |
| eharney | a quick grep says that tempest is probably only testing the old one | 14:58 |
| rosmaita | ok, thanks | 14:58 |
| rosmaita | so if we care about this, we can update the tempest tests first | 14:58 |
| rosmaita | probably worth doing anyway? | 14:59 |
| eharney | yes | 14:59 |
| rosmaita | so this is only an issue if we intend on removing the os-volume-transfer urls | 14:59 |
| whoami-rajat | rosmaita: what about default volume types? (I'm trying to write tests for it but lacking the endpoint support for the unique url) | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | well, i don't know if we want to require that people make those accessible to end users | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | actually , i guess we don't | 15:00 |
| rosmaita | ok, we are out of time, i will pick this up next week | 15:01 |
| whoami-rajat | thanks! | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | sorry about no open discussion, we spent all our time voting | 15:01 |
| rosmaita | #endmeeting | 15:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 15:01 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed May 5 15:01:47 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:01 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2021/cinder.2021-05-05-14.00.html | 15:01 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2021/cinder.2021-05-05-14.00.txt | 15:01 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2021/cinder.2021-05-05-14.00.log.html | 15:01 |
| vishalmanchanda | #startmeeting horizon | 15:01 |
| openstack | Meeting started Wed May 5 15:01:59 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is vishalmanchanda. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:02 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:02 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'horizon' | 15:02 |
| vishalmanchanda | hi anyone around for horizon meeting? | 15:03 |
| tmazur | o/ | 15:04 |
| rdopiera | o/ | 15:04 |
| vishalmanchanda | Let's start the meeting. | 15:05 |
| vishalmanchanda | #topic Notices | 15:06 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Notices (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:06 | |
| vishalmanchanda | I have no notices for this week. | 15:06 |
| vishalmanchanda | tmazur: rdopiera : Do you have notice to announce or we can move to next topic? | 15:07 |
| tmazur | I have something for bug triage. Shall I wait or we can do it now? | 15:07 |
| vishalmanchanda | we can discuss it during open-discussion. | 15:08 |
| tmazur | Ok | 15:08 |
| vishalmanchanda | #topic nodjs migration | 15:08 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "nodjs migration (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:08 | |
| vishalmanchanda | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22migrate-to-nodejs14%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 15:08 |
| vishalmanchanda | Most of the patches already have one +2, Please review them so that we can move to next step i.e. drop nodejs10 jobs. | 15:09 |
| vishalmanchanda | I have also purposed a patch to governance to change runtime of nodejs to nodejs14 last week and it is already merged. | 15:10 |
| vishalmanchanda | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/788306 | 15:10 |
| vishalmanchanda | Note: horizon cores can also give +2 on plugins patches and approve them if it is already have +2 from plugin team. | 15:11 |
| amotoki | note that it is true for most plugins (not all) | 15:11 |
| vishalmanchanda | yeah. | 15:12 |
| vishalmanchanda | ok moving on to next topic | 15:13 |
| vishalmanchanda | #topic django migration | 15:13 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "django migration (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:13 | |
| vishalmanchanda | no update on this topic. | 15:13 |
| vishalmanchanda | django-pyscss owner didn't responded yet to my email. | 15:13 |
| vishalmanchanda | I will send a reminder after the meeting. | 15:14 |
| vishalmanchanda | amotoki: I have a question regarding this topic? | 15:14 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: I am confused with your question mark | 15:15 |
| vishalmanchanda | Can't we purpose patches to django-pyscss fork which is created by ivan to make it work with django3.x | 15:16 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: which fork do you mean? | 15:16 |
| vishalmanchanda | I wonder what we do if django-pyscss owner didn't respond | 15:17 |
| amotoki | do you mean a github fork by Ivan? | 15:17 |
| vishalmanchanda | https://github.com/e0ne/django-pyscss | 15:17 |
| vishalmanchanda | amotoki: yes | 15:17 |
| amotoki | I am not sure Ivan would like to be a new owner for the fork or not. | 15:18 |
| rdopiera | it or switch to the django-sass-processor | 15:18 |
| rdopiera | fork it or * | 15:18 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera: have you tried django-sass-processor? | 15:18 |
| rdopiera | vishalmanchanda: I started on it today, but didn't get it working yet | 15:19 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera: ok. | 15:19 |
| rdopiera | one nice thing that it has is that you can add python functions to it | 15:19 |
| amotoki | IMHO at least we should not depend on a personal effort. | 15:19 |
| amotoki | if we fork the upstream as horizon team, we should do it as a team (not depending on a private github repo) | 15:20 |
| amotoki | unless someone would like to maintain it | 15:20 |
| rdopiera | that's why moving it under opendev might make sense | 15:20 |
| amotoki | rdopiera: =1 | 15:21 |
| amotoki | +1 | 15:21 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera: +1. | 15:21 |
| amotoki | on the other hand, perhaps we don't want to maintain it for general purposes (even if we fork it under opendev) so it might be a transient solution | 15:23 |
| rdopiera | we would have to rename the fork anyways | 15:24 |
| rdopiera | we could as well rename it to something horizon-specific | 15:24 |
| rdopiera | to discourage use by other projects | 15:24 |
| amotoki | yeah, that's true | 15:25 |
| vishalmanchanda | Ok let's wait for one more week if django-pyscss owner responds otherwise we have to move forward either with horizon-specific django-pyscss fork or django-sass-processor. | 15:26 |
| vishalmanchanda | moving to next topic. | 15:27 |
| vishalmanchanda | #Support for Angular 1.8.x in Horizon | 15:28 |
| vishalmanchanda | #topic Support for Angular 1.8.x in Horizon | 15:28 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Support for Angular 1.8.x in Horizon (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:28 | |
| vishalmanchanda | Some of the horizon angular panels (keypair and glance) are broken in Debian Bullseye distribution. | 15:28 |
| vishalmanchanda | there is mail about it on open-discuss | 15:29 |
| vishalmanchanda | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-May/022243.html | 15:29 |
| vishalmanchanda | I have never used Debian so far. | 15:30 |
| vishalmanchanda | As of now we use angular 1.5.8.0 https://github.com/openstack/horizon/blob/master/requirements.txt#L44 | 15:30 |
| rdopiera | should we add <1.8 to our requirements for Angular? | 15:30 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera: what if we update angular to 1.8.2? | 15:31 |
| rdopiera | that would be great, however, I have no idea how to do it and how much work it would be | 15:33 |
| tmazur | I can see some breaking changes but not sure yet if we are affected or not | 15:34 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera: if we add <1.8 to our requirements for Angular does that fix the issue? | 15:35 |
| rdopiera | vishalmanchanda: it moves the problem from us to the Debian maintainers ;-) | 15:36 |
| rdopiera | but no, it does not fix it | 15:37 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera: I have no idea about that. | 15:37 |
| vishalmanchanda | Updating angular to 1.8.2 requires a lot of code changes. | 15:38 |
| rdopiera | just ignore my suggestion, we are in the best position to fix it | 15:39 |
| vishalmanchanda | I have started doing that in the morning but I am able to do it only for 2 files taking reference from old patches. | 15:39 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera: what if I pushed an initial patch to upgrade angular-js to 1.8.2 | 15:43 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera: Could you help me with reviews? | 15:43 |
| rdopiera | vishalmanchanda: I still haven't learned Angular | 15:44 |
| tmazur | I definitely can :) | 15:44 |
| vishalmanchanda | tmazur: thanks. | 15:45 |
| vishalmanchanda | I am also not an expert on angular but I will push some code for the upgrade taking reference from old patches. | 15:46 |
| tmazur | Yeah, let's see how it breaks everything | 15:47 |
| tmazur | (I hope not though) | 15:47 |
| vishalmanchanda | tmazur: 🙂 | 15:47 |
| vishalmanchanda | I am sure it will break many panels | 15:48 |
| vishalmanchanda | But Let's see. | 15:48 |
| vishalmanchanda | meanwhile, I will report a new bug for this upgarde so it's easy to track. | 15:50 |
| vishalmanchanda | #topic open-discussion | 15:50 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "open-discussion (Meeting topic: horizon)" | 15:50 | |
| tmazur | So, speaking of bugs | 15:51 |
| tmazur | Here's an etherpad page for triage. https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-bug-triage | 15:51 |
| tmazur | To not overwhelm us, I took a look at the first 10 | 15:52 |
| vishalmanchanda | tmazur: great work:) | 15:53 |
| tmazur | Two of the newest bugs seemed pretty simple so I've commited patches. Also the one about release notes needs reviews. | 15:53 |
| amotoki | which order? latest ones first? | 15:54 |
| tmazur | One appeared to be a duplicate, two are about system scope, so I've marked them as high priority and triaged | 15:54 |
| tmazur | Yes, latest ones first. | 15:54 |
| rdopiera | the one about novaclient logs is fixed and merged, not sure if we want backports | 15:54 |
| tmazur | Since we have a lot of them, I've decided to start from the top now. Later I am planning to look through the oldest | 15:55 |
| tmazur | Actually, I've closed some old ones too, just not added them here, again, to not overwhelm us. | 15:55 |
| ikanias | regarding automation, are we considering moving from Selenium to Cypress.io in the future? | 15:55 |
| amotoki | apart from bug triage, I have another topic on stable branch EOL. Discussion on otaca and pike EOL started. Who would like to maintain these in horizon? | 15:55 |
| amotoki | tmazur: you can assign bugs on system scope to me. | 15:56 |
| tmazur | amotoki: ok, thanks! | 15:57 |
| amotoki | rdopiera: tmazur: do you still need to have ocata and pike branches? | 15:57 |
| tmazur | So essentially: please review the ones that are on review, please take a look at ones that need confirmation. Feel free to add your notes! | 15:57 |
| rdopiera | amotoki: we will drop support for osp13 later this year, and only support osp16+ since, so we don't need anything older than Train | 15:58 |
| amotoki | rdopiera: which stable branch corresponds to osp13? | 15:59 |
| rdopiera | Queens | 15:59 |
| amotoki | so, you don't see a block for ocata and pike EOL? | 16:00 |
| amotoki | at least from osp perspective? | 16:00 |
| rdopiera | correct | 16:00 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda is our PTL and release liaison, so perhaps it is in his radar. | 16:00 |
| vishalmanchanda | guys we are out of time. | 16:00 |
| vishalmanchanda | let's discuss it in horizon channel. | 16:01 |
| vishalmanchanda | Thanks everyone for your contribution. | 16:01 |
| tmazur | Thanks everyone! | 16:01 |
| vishalmanchanda | #endmeeting | 16:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 16:01 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed May 5 16:01:44 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:01 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-05-05-15.01.html | 16:01 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-05-05-15.01.txt | 16:01 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-05-05-15.01.log.html | 16:01 |
| *** rosmaita has left #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:02 | |
| *** rdopiera has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:33 | |
| *** dviroel|nho is now known as dviroel | 16:38 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:45 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 16:52 | |
| *** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
| *** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:02 | |
| *** zzzeek has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:08 | |
| *** zzzeek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 17:08 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC | 17:23 | |
| *** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| *** knikolla has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 18:10 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 18:20 | |
| *** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC | 18:46 | |
| *** Dantalion has quit IRC | 18:47 | |
| *** Dantalion has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 18:48 | |
| *** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 18:52 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 19:01 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 19:24 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 19:29 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 19:38 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 20:10 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 20:26 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 20:38 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 20:41 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 20:54 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 21:12 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 21:13 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 21:31 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 21:52 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:06 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 22:10 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:14 | |
| *** reddy has quit IRC | 22:21 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 22:30 | |
| *** miniroy has quit IRC | 22:32 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 22:41 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 23:03 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:04 | |
| *** macz_ has quit IRC | 23:06 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
| *** tmazur has quit IRC | 23:18 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:36 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:45 | |
| *** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt | 23:47 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!