*** dviroel|rover|bbl is now known as dviroel|rover | 00:05 | |
*** dviroel|rover is now known as dviroel|rover|out | 00:38 | |
*** dviroel|rover|out is now known as dviroel|holiday | 00:38 | |
whoami-rajat | #startmeeting cinder | 14:00 |
---|---|---|
opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Nov 2 14:00:01 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is whoami-rajat. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:00 |
whoami-rajat | #topic roll call | 14:00 |
eharney | hi | 14:00 |
jungleboyj | o/ | 14:00 |
rosmaita | o/ | 14:00 |
aneeeshp1 | hi | 14:00 |
mubeen | hi | 14:00 |
ganso | hello | 14:01 |
abdi | hi | 14:01 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-antelope-meetings | 14:02 |
*** Guest202 is now known as dasm | 14:03 | |
whoami-rajat | Welcome everyone back after the PTG | 14:03 |
whoami-rajat | it was a good week of useful discussions | 14:03 |
whoami-rajat | and that is related to my first announcement | 14:03 |
whoami-rajat | #topic announcements | 14:03 |
whoami-rajat | PTG Summary | 14:04 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-November/031049.html | 14:04 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderAntelopePTGSummary | 14:04 |
whoami-rajat | I've created a summary of all the topics we've discussed with links to the etherpad and recordings | 14:04 |
whoami-rajat | to all the people who couldn't make it to the PTG, they can watch the sessions they're interested in | 14:05 |
whoami-rajat | (since i don't expect anyone watching 16 hours of video meeting) | 14:05 |
whoami-rajat | moving on | 14:05 |
jungleboyj | Did I get all the recordings posted? | 14:05 |
whoami-rajat | next, Antelope schedule | 14:05 |
whoami-rajat | jungleboyj, yes, as far as i checked | 14:06 |
whoami-rajat | jungleboyj, thank you for uploading them! | 14:06 |
jungleboyj | Ok. Good. Just wanted to make sure I was caught up. | 14:06 |
whoami-rajat | I calculated the total time of all the parts of a particular day and they added up to 3-4 hours so it looks good | 14:07 |
jungleboyj | Great! | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | ok moving on then | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | next, Antelope schedule | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862815 | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_8dd/862815/1/check/openstack-tox-docs/8ddc61d/docs/antelope/schedule.html | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | please check the second link above ^ it contains the cinder specific cycle schedule of antelope | 14:08 |
whoami-rajat | the idea is to check for dates of deadlines and see if it has any conflicts | 14:08 |
whoami-rajat | I've moved some deadlines since they overlap with the year end break | 14:08 |
whoami-rajat | but more eyes on it would be useful | 14:09 |
whoami-rajat | look in the "Project-specific events" column | 14:09 |
jungleboyj | One thing I see is that the Mid Cycle is the week after Thanksgiving. Not sure if anyone is planning to be out the week after ... | 14:12 |
rosmaita | midcycle-1 date looks good, but midcycle-2 may be a holiday in Brazil ... i think most of our netapp people are there? | 14:12 |
jungleboyj | rosmaita: ++ | 14:12 |
whoami-rajat | ack, this cycle is short so we've only so much weeks spare that the deadlines don't overlap | 14:13 |
whoami-rajat | but good feedback, maybe we can move it one week before or after | 14:13 |
jungleboyj | Looking at things I think the Mid-Cycle 1 is probably best where it is before we get into December. | 14:13 |
whoami-rajat | i will remove midcycle 2 from my current review and we can decide later on the date | 14:14 |
whoami-rajat | jungleboyj, yep, tried to keep it before the year end holidays | 14:14 |
jungleboyj | ++ and most people do vacation before Thanksgiving if they are going to take extra time off. | 14:15 |
whoami-rajat | and it will be a good checkpoint for spec reviews and status | 14:15 |
whoami-rajat | ack, good feedback, will keep in mind | 14:15 |
whoami-rajat | if you remember some more conflicts later, please leave a comment on my proposed patch | 14:16 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862815 | 14:16 |
whoami-rajat | guess we can move on with the final announcement | 14:17 |
whoami-rajat | Wallaby moving to EM | 14:18 |
whoami-rajat | there is a patch proposed in releases project to move wallaby into EM | 14:18 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862313 | 14:18 |
whoami-rajat | actually there is a patch for every project | 14:18 |
whoami-rajat | since Jon had a patch to release wallaby, it seemed like a good idea to get that one done first before moving into EM | 14:19 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/848842 | 14:19 |
whoami-rajat | so this will be the final wallaby release and after that we wallaby will be moved to EM | 14:19 |
whoami-rajat | that's all the announcements from my side | 14:20 |
whoami-rajat | anyone has anything else? | 14:20 |
whoami-rajat | guess not, so we can move to the next segment | 14:21 |
whoami-rajat | #topic PTG Follow-up | 14:21 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, i think you added it? | 14:21 |
rosmaita | yeah, just wanted to say i did send in the revised user survey questions | 14:22 |
rosmaita | the other thing is the 'service' role | 14:22 |
rosmaita | the policy-pop-up team wants to get it implemented by M-1 | 14:22 |
whoami-rajat | yep, thanks for following up on that and mentioning it in the etherpad, I've added that in the PTG summary as well - DONE | 14:23 |
rosmaita | which is coming up fast | 14:23 |
rosmaita | the spec hasn't been approved yet, so if you have any interest, might be worth leaving a +1 to help push it along | 14:23 |
rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone-specs/+/818616 | 14:23 |
rosmaita | abhishek from the glance team has volunteered to implement it | 14:24 |
rosmaita | so it's really a matter at this point to get the spec approved | 14:24 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, the assignee is still mentioned as lbragstad, would be good if Abhishek takes a look and revises it | 14:24 |
rosmaita | good point | 14:25 |
rosmaita | i'll mention it on the glance agenda for tomorrow | 14:25 |
whoami-rajat | ack | 14:25 |
whoami-rajat | i think reviewing the spec would be good to understand more about how/where to use it, I will take a look | 14:25 |
rosmaita | that's all from me | 14:27 |
whoami-rajat | great, thanks for bringing it up | 14:27 |
whoami-rajat | moving on to next topic | 14:27 |
whoami-rajat | #topic Outreachy update | 14:27 |
whoami-rajat | is Sofia around? | 14:27 |
eharney | i think not | 14:28 |
whoami-rajat | can't find her with nick | 14:28 |
whoami-rajat | ok | 14:28 |
whoami-rajat | Since I'm co-mentoring with her, i can take this topic | 14:28 |
whoami-rajat | this friday is the deadline for proposing the first patch and then an outreachy candidate can be considered for internship | 14:29 |
whoami-rajat | we haven't seen much contribution but one contributor has been actively working on a patch | 14:29 |
whoami-rajat | and it is related to our outreachy intern project as well | 14:29 |
whoami-rajat | so would be good to keep some eyes on | 14:29 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/861491 | 14:29 |
whoami-rajat | i think that's all she wanted to mention | 14:31 |
whoami-rajat | let's move to the next topic | 14:31 |
whoami-rajat | #topic EOL-ing older stable branches | 14:31 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, that's you again | 14:31 |
rosmaita | yeah, there has been some discussion on the ML | 14:31 |
rosmaita | the release team wants to EOL Queens across all projects | 14:32 |
rosmaita | nova and ironic (and maybe neutron?) want to EOL rocky and stein as well | 14:32 |
rosmaita | so i was wondering if we would want to also EOL rocky and stein | 14:32 |
rosmaita | so to be clear about what this means | 14:33 |
rosmaita | each branch will be tagged with an -eol tag, and then the stable branch will be deleted | 14:33 |
rosmaita | so no one can propose changes to it | 14:33 |
rosmaita | but, if someone needs it for some reason, they can check out the git tag | 14:33 |
rosmaita | the reason for us to stay in sync with nova is that if we run into problems in stable/rocky or stable/stein tempest tests, they won't be fixing anything | 14:34 |
rosmaita | so we might have to EOL at that point, anyway | 14:34 |
rosmaita | this way, we just get the branches out of our lives right now | 14:35 |
rosmaita | ... and i will shut up and see if anyone wants to say anything | 14:35 |
whoami-rajat | I think I'm OK with this change since i don't even see people proposing backports after train | 14:35 |
whoami-rajat | even maintaining CI on these branches is extra burden for us | 14:36 |
rosmaita | yeah, there hasn't been much action on those branches at all recently | 14:36 |
rosmaita | train is the last branch that supports python 2.7 iirc, so if there's some kind of security fix needed, it would be py27 compatible, and people could backport it themselves from train to whatever locally | 14:38 |
whoami-rajat | maybe Jon would have some feedback since he's our release maintainer but not sure | 14:38 |
jungleboyj | I support doing this. :-) | 14:38 |
whoami-rajat | anyway, I'm in favor of it | 14:38 |
rosmaita | (just checked, i am correct about py27 on train: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/train.html ) | 14:39 |
abdi | rosmaita: If i may ask. From a third party cinder CI maintainer perspective. What would be the impact? I don't suspect any but thought I'd ask. | 14:39 |
rosmaita | well, we don't require third-party CI on the stable branches, just a statement on any backport patches that you have tested it on the stable branch and it's ok | 14:41 |
rosmaita | so i don't think there's much impact for CI | 14:41 |
abdi | Sounds good. | 14:41 |
rosmaita | but if you have customers on any of those old releases, you'll have to fix them privately | 14:42 |
rosmaita | because there won't be an upstream branch to merge the changes to | 14:42 |
rosmaita | whoami-rajat: maybe ask jon to send something to the ML and see if there are any objections? | 14:42 |
rosmaita | he can use the nova email as a model | 14:43 |
abdi | Understood. In such cases, we have a strong case to get them to upgrade. | 14:43 |
rosmaita | abdi: exactly! | 14:43 |
jungleboyj | ++ | 14:43 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, sure, will do | 14:43 |
rosmaita | sounds like all of us here are in favor | 14:44 |
whoami-rajat | +1 | 14:44 |
jungleboyj | No concerns from me. Most of the people I have heard of are on Train as the oldest release. | 14:45 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, anything else on this? | 14:47 |
rosmaita | nothing from me | 14:47 |
whoami-rajat | cool, let's move to the next few topics there | 14:47 |
rosmaita | (sorry, sort of left you hanging there) | 14:47 |
whoami-rajat | there are a bunch of review requests | 14:47 |
whoami-rajat | oh no problem | 14:47 |
whoami-rajat | #topic request for review of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/812685 | 14:47 |
whoami-rajat | ganso, anything you would like to say about it apart from requesting reviews? | 14:48 |
whoami-rajat | I've reviewed it btw | 14:48 |
ganso | whoami-rajat: no, not really | 14:48 |
ganso | just that we've been waiting for this fix for a while | 14:48 |
ganso | I see no reason to delay it further | 14:48 |
ganso | it would be nice to have some attention | 14:48 |
whoami-rajat | yeah, glance is kind of moving towards multi store and we will start seeing these failures more often | 14:49 |
ganso | if there is anything pending, please post to the gerrit patch, like test-coverage, improvements,e tc | 14:49 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, maybe you could take a look from glance perpspective? ^ | 14:49 |
whoami-rajat | perspective | 14:49 |
ganso | whoami-rajat: thanks for reviewing =) | 14:50 |
rosmaita | ganso: i will review today | 14:50 |
whoami-rajat | great, thanks ganso and rosmaita | 14:50 |
rosmaita | i think i did the nova patch it's based on | 14:50 |
whoami-rajat | then this would be familiar code changes, there are a bunch of things i don't understand | 14:50 |
whoami-rajat | would be good to get some clarity on them | 14:50 |
rosmaita | ok | 14:51 |
whoami-rajat | cool, moving on to the next review request | 14:51 |
whoami-rajat | #topic Request for review of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/815582 | 14:51 |
whoami-rajat | abdi, i see it's introducing a new HPE driver, anything you would like to say about it? | 14:51 |
abdi | This one is mine. | 14:51 |
abdi | Yes. | 14:51 |
whoami-rajat | cool, stage is yours | 14:52 |
abdi | The iSCSI tests consistently run into 2 volume swap test failures. We believe to have root caused it to a potential race condition between os-brick and nova. | 14:53 |
abdi | So, I'd like to get a review and acceptance of the driver. | 14:53 |
abdi | The bug in question #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1989232. | 14:54 |
whoami-rajat | ack, we target all drivers for M2, would be a good discussion topic for midcycle 1 as well | 14:54 |
abdi | Ok. I'd love to get an early accept on this so I don't worry about it making it into the next release. | 14:55 |
whoami-rajat | yes, will try to do that | 14:56 |
whoami-rajat | abdi, anything else on this? | 14:56 |
abdi | rosmaita: There are a few comments on the patch it would be good for you to resolve after you've reviewed my comments. | 14:56 |
abdi | Other than that. Nothing else from me. | 14:57 |
abdi | I'll monitor the patch for your acceptance. Thanks. | 14:57 |
whoami-rajat | ack, great | 14:57 |
whoami-rajat | let's quickly go over the last review request | 14:57 |
whoami-rajat | #topic Request for review of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/849143 | 14:58 |
whoami-rajat | aneeeshp1, that's you | 14:58 |
rosmaita | abdi: ack | 14:58 |
aneeeshp1 | Hi all | 14:58 |
aneeeshp1 | Yes. i have addressed the comments received | 14:58 |
abdi | rosmaita: Thx. | 14:58 |
aneeeshp1 | Thank you for reviewing | 14:58 |
aneeeshp1 | Ci setup is now running and the driver passed tempest | 14:58 |
aneeeshp1 | I would like to request further review on the patch | 14:59 |
whoami-rajat | i remember there were CI issues due to which it couldn't get into Zed, good to know things are good now | 14:59 |
aneeeshp1 | Just to get it reviewed earlier to avoid missing the next release | 14:59 |
aneeeshp1 | whoami-rajat yes the CI is up now | 14:59 |
aneeeshp1 | Nothing else from me other than this request | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | aneeeshp1, great, I will review and keep an eye on it | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | and we're out of time | 15:00 |
aneeeshp1 | whoami-rajat thank you | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | thanks everyone for joining! | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | #endmeeting | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Nov 2 15:00:57 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2022/cinder.2022-11-02-14.00.html | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2022/cinder.2022-11-02-14.00.txt | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2022/cinder.2022-11-02-14.00.log.html | 15:00 |
jungleboyj | Thank you! | 15:02 |
*** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 21:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!